Integrated Mobility Plan for Greater Ahmedabad Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Integrated Mobility Plan for Greater Ahmedabad Region Nitika Bhakuni Associate Professor, Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, CEPT University 10th November, 2016 Concept of Land use Transport Integration Involves two simultaneous Landuse mutually supportive processes- Organizing the physical form and land use pattern of a city Organizing all systems Accessibility Activity of transportation from pedestrian pathways to mass transit systems Transport Infrastructur e Source: http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/methods/tlucomponents.html CoE-UT CEPT University 2 Urban Structure – Impact on Transport Demand Land use and Transport are intricately linked to each other a 2way relationship Land Use/Activity distribution determines the demand for transport Transport supply influences land use/activity distribution Planning is undertaken separately as two different exercises; often by two different agencies Making separate plans is like clapping with one hand Lack of integration leads to un-intended consequences CoE-UT CEPT University 3 Integrated Land Use Transport !! Land Use Planning Urban Transport Planning Framework – Statutory Framework – Not statutory ◦ Plan Elements ◦ Plan Elements Location & Intensity of Land Use – Plan/Map Proposals for transport networks, A set of DC Regulations – FSI, infrastructure, etc Zoning, Setbacks,… ◦ Issues ◦ Issues Predict & Provide & Not Strategic Takes a long time to prepare; Revisions – once in 10 years ? Inputs & Outputs– Not Outcomes Lack integration – economic Projects & Not Strategies development, environment, urban Investment Focus – Not Management poor, transport Big Ticket Projects - Mode bias – Focus on New Developments – Affordability? Expansion - No renewal Driven by Funding /Donor Networks form the only part of transport plan /Technology Provider Generally restricted to regional Takes Land Use as Given – Generated level- urban and local level issues Traffic – Ignored ignored Usually unrealistic Implementation & Monitoring not robust What we need is Access; Mobility of Inward looking plans that often lack People & Goods 4 comprehensiveness CoE-UT CEPT University Ahmedabad Region - When cities grow, they become ‘City Regions’ To Mehsana To Himatnagar Total Area 4708 Sqkm Total Population KADI • 8.1 mn (2011) • 12.5 mn (2031) KALOL GANDHINAGAR Total Employment • 3.1 mn (2011) ADALEJ GIFT DEHGAM • 5.4 mn(2031) VIRANGAM CHILODA To Kandla LEGEND AHMEDABAD GIDC AMC SANAND GUDA AUDA Outer Urban centers GIFT city Industrial Areas No. of BAREJA SIR TAZs BAVLA MEMDABAD Water body Regional roads AUDA(AMC ) 388(242) Rail KHEDA GUDA 74 0 5 10 KM To Rajkot To Vadodara OUTSIDE AUDA & 235 GUDA Total 697 CoE-UT CEPT University Study Area Jurisdictional Comprises of Area Population 2011 areas AUDA 10 urban areas 1877.7 sq km 6,526,017 (Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad (includes new (5,568,695) Cantonment, Bopal, AMC area of Singarva, Nandej, Sanand, 466.06 sq km)* Kalol, Chiloda, Dehgam and Mehmadabad) & 163 villages GUDA 2 urban areas 394.71 sq km 549,730 (Gandhinagar, Adalaj) and 37 villages Outside AUDA 4 urban areas (Kadi, Kheda, 2436.04 sq km 1,091,207 and GUDA Viramgam, Bavla) and 270 villages Total 16 urban areas, 470 villages 4708.45 sq km 8,112,465 12.5 million people by 2031 Employment would increase by 70% from 3.1 million jobs to 5.4 million jobs in 2031 6 CoE-UT CEPT University Plan Vision The vision for the Greater Ahmedabad region for the year 2031 and beyond is to “Integrate city structure and transport system towards greater accessibility, efficient mobility and lower carbon future” 7 CoE-UT CEPT University Strategic Goals To develop integrated urban growth strategies and transportation infrastructure which encourages compact development and supports envisaged economic development in the region making Ahmedabad a globally preferred investment region To facilitate efficient movement of people and goods by improving transportation network and also providing more transportation choices to its residents To provide a sustainable and safer transportation system focusing on non motorised modes and public transportation system 8 CoE-UT CEPT University Urban Growth Scenario DENSITY SCENARIOS INR 2000 INR 3000 Crores/Yr Crores/yr Density – 150 persons/ha Density – 125 persons/ha Area - 666 sqkm Area - 800 sqkm INR 4500 INR 6075 Crores /yr Crores /yr Density – 100 persons/ha Density – 75 persons/ha Area - 1000 sqkm Area - 1333 sqkm 9 CoE-UT CEPT University 3 tier development approach- transport plans REGIONAL PLAN URBAN PLAN NODAL PLANS Greater Ahmedabad Region Ahmedabad -Gandhinagar e.g. Sanand City A regional plan functioning for A Compact City Plan A plan for the nodes to develop as towns of integrating the main city and surrounding Developing strong ring and radial as city high quality residential/activity areas nodes/towns. wide network comparable to that of Ahmedabad. Developing Freight Corridors for the While community forms a grid network Specially developed zones Developing Radials as transit ready streets Promoting NMV transit 10 3 tier Planning Process Development Plan” “Town Planning Local Area Plan” (Micro (Macro Level) Schemes” (Micro Level) Level) Zoning Proposals Land reconstitution Detailed area level plan with urban Regulation for Development Neighborhood level road network , design interventions City level Transportation and social and physical Planning for TOZ infrastructure planning and infrastructure Amendment in Gujarat Town implementation Financing of neighborhood level Planning & Urban Development Act, infrastructure 1976 ‐Local Area Plan 11 Linking growth in the region Mehsana LEGEND 12 CoE-UT CEPT University Towards Dholera SIR Regional Network Development of New section Pilvai Vijapur Bechaeaji Vasai (45 km) Bilodra Mahudi Sitapur Santhal Freight corridor (125 Km) Prantij Connects - Bechraji, Viramgam Vithalpur HarsolSIR, Tata Nano, Changodhar SIR, Talod Dholera SIR to Kandla and Mundra Port. Kadi Kalol Gandhinagar Freight Corridor connects to Adalej Kandla Port GIFT LEGEND Virangam Dehgam Urban centers Regional ring Regional Freight corridor Regional radials Virangam TATA BhopalAhmedaba Dedicated Freight corridor SIR Nano d Bypass road Zolapur Sanand SP ring road Kathlal Daskr Special Investment Zone Jetalpu oi Major proposed regional link Changod r Nande Major proposed regional ar SIR Bareja j radial Bhavla Mahudh Mehmedabad a Dholka Kheda 0 10 20 KM . CoE-UT CEPT University R 8 R 7 R 9 Urban Arterials Road Network Characteristics: R 6 Number of Regional Radials – 14 R 14 Number of Urban Radials (arterials) – 17 A 9 A 7 A 8 A 6 Avg distance between Inner rings- 1.5 km Avg distance between Outer rings- 4-5 km R 13 A 13 R 5 A 14 A 5 Avg distance between radials – 5.5 Km (WRT SP Ring Road) R 10 A 10 Average Grid size at block level _ 1.2 x 1.5 km A 15 A 4 LEGEND Regional radials A 11 R 4 Urban Arterials R 11 A 16 SP ring road A 12 Proposed bypass A 1 A 17 Express highway A 2 A 3 Other roads R 12 Railway line Urban built 0 2 4 8 KM R 1 R 3 . R 2 CoE-UT CEPT University Urban Arterials and Sub-Arterials – Level 1 & 2 Concept of Transit Ready Streets adopted LEGEND Existing Urban Arterials Proposed Urban Arterials Existing Sub-Arterials Proposed Sub-Arterials Railway line Urban built Water body CoE-UT CEPT University Collectors – Level 3 Road structure Characteristics- emphasis on Pedestrians Average Neighbourhood size – 1.5 kmX2km Signalized Junction at every 1-1.5 Km Non signalized junction at every 0.5-.08 Km Multiple access points for each block to reduce congestion No through roads to discourage through traffic LEGEND Existing Urban Arterials Proposed Urban Arterials Existing Sub-Arterials Proposed Sub-Arterials Existing Collectors Railway line Urban built Water body 17 CoE-UT CEPT University Connecting Clusters with PT DFC corridor BechrajiBechraji Prantij Kadi Kalol Gandhinagar Towards Viramgam Kandla PORT Dehgam Sanand SIR Viramgam Tata Nano SIR Sanand Changodhar SIR LEGEND Mehemdabad BRT Dholka Metro Kheda Regional Rail CoE-UT CEPT University Public Transport Network 19 CoE-UT CEPT University Transit Oriented Zone 20 CoE-UT CEPT University Transit Oriented Zone Higher density development Pedestrian friendly streets Green Network Efficient use of front margin Efficient use of ground Higher transit connectivity High intensity of infrastructure Well designed and well managed public parking (On‐street & Off‐street ) Destine to city tourist places, Economic Centre, Commercial hub and major transit route 21 CoE-UT CEPT University Proposals for city bus services Fleet Augmentation Route rationalization • Bus improvement scheme • Network coverage densification • Feeder services Improvement in service quality • Infrastructure improvement • Fleet renewal • Passenger information system 22 CoE-UT CEPT University Strategies for NMT • Creation of complete streets for facilitating non- motorised movements • Improving access to mass transit stations - Local Area Access Plans (LAAP) • Design of pedestrian and cycle friendly streets having continuous and well maintained footpaths • Providing direct connections to activity centres • Minimising conflicts with motorised traffic at the area level through traffic calming measures • Place making projects around Bhadra fort and Law Garden area aiming to “provide spaces back to people” 23 CoE-UT CEPT University Local Area Access Plan LEGEND 0 1 2 .4 KM CoE-UT CEPT University Demand management Parking policies Free parking should be minimized or eliminated Use variable parking charges more widely