MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
POSITIVE STEPS CAREERS GUIDANCE SERVICE ROCHDALE – December 2019 SUPPORT | CHALLENGE | CHANGE Page 1 of 25
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This month’s overall figure of those Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET) has remained stable, increasing slightly this month from 2.7% to 2.8%, and remains notably lower than the same month last year, a figure of 3.2%. Within this, the year 12 NEET figure remained strong, remaining the same as last month at 1.7%. Participation in learning has fractionally decreased from 95.9% to 95.8% but again remains significantly higher than December of last year, which was 93.1%. December was a challenging month for progressions due to the Christmas holiday, with less available start dates in employment and training, and many young people preferring to wait until January to start training.
Unknown or Lapsed has been a real focus for us again this month and we are really pleased to see the actual numbers of young people in the Year12/13 cohorts reducing to 43; this equates to a percentage of 0.9%. We are also pleased to see that this hasn’t caused a significant rise in NEET. We have employed a range of new strategies to achieve this, including wider use of early evening calls and home visits. We continue to review this group each month to make sure that our work is targeted and effective and we will continue to build on this good work. We have invested some time in Marketing the service and we have seen a significant increase in telephone referrals, not just from professionals but from clients themselves, which is very positive.
The percentage of young people that are NEET in the Rochdale locality has remained the same and we have several young people awaiting a start date for a Study Programme who are currently engaging with the Skills Support for Growth Programme. The Ward areas which have seen the increase in the number of young people who are NEET are Bamford, Smallbridge & Firgrove and Spotland & Falinge, the Ward areas which have seen a decease in the number of young people who are NEET are Balderstone & Kirkholt, Castleton, Kingsway and Milkstone & Deeplish.
We have seen an increase in NEET in Middleton locality from 2.1% to 2.4%, an increase of 4 young people, all of whom have come from West Middleton causing an increase from 4.3% to 5.8%. A closer look at this picture tells us that 7 young people became NEET in this ward in December (balanced against 3 becoming EET). 5 of these young people have been withdrawn from college for a variety of reasons including issues with behaviour and attendance. We received referrals from YJS, Children’s Social Care, the SEN team and the college themselves regarding these leavers meaning that these young people have been quickly identified and engaged. Our Career Advisers (Anna and Cherry) are continuing to support these young people through the Lighthouse Project and outreach where needed. We are disappointed to see a decrease in the number and percentage of young people with SEND who are EET, however the percentage remains above 90%. We attribute this to the continued work to track and home visit this cohort of young people.
After a strong start to the academic year we have seen a decrease in participation of Cared for Children of 8 young people. As a complex client group this has been due to a wide range of sometimes very challenging issues including leaving EET due to Mental and Physical Health issues and disruption due to changes to housing. Our specialist Career Adviser based with the cared for children team has continued to offer support not only to NEET young people but to those in EET to try and support them to sustain EET where possible. This includes liaising with Training Providers and Employers to advocate on these young people’s behalf. This month Nicola has also supported a care leaver who has returned to Rochdale after some time living out of area. He is a young father and is keen to work, only recently receiving an NI number and being able to do so. Nicola has supported him to create a CV and complete job search and he has already secured a place on a Retail course with ELP which will give him access to jobs in the new retail development in Rochdale.
Our ongoing Professional Practice sessions allow a means for Career Advisers to share and develop ideas and good practice across the team. We have held NEET and Unknown strategy meetings to look at our broader resource allocation and to share good practice but continued to also meet within locality teams to ensure that our approach is tailored to the needs of each township. This has included sharing ideas about engaging with “hard to help” clients with issues with motivation and anxiety and the ways that “small steps” can be used for initial engagement, including our blended guidance model that incorporates traditional career guidance and motivational interviewing using NLP techniques including the “chimp” model.
Angela Davey and Lucy Smith Page 2 of 25
YEAR 12/13 NEET AS PERCENTAGE OF COHORT 4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0% Novembe Decembe April May June Quarter 1 July August Sept Quarter 2 October Quarter 3 January February March Quarter 4 r r LAST YEAR'S PERFORMANCE 3.6% 3.3% 3.6% 3.6% 3.0% 3.2% 3.2% 3.1% 3.4% 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% ACTUAL (Yr 12/13) 3.5% 2.8% 3.5% 3.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 2.7% 0.0%
NEET AS % OF COHORT
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March ACTUAL NUMBERS 170 160 169 131 134 139 COHORT SIZE 4,899 4,897 4,893 4,964 5,004 4,988 NUMBERS 12 months ago 181 187 184 146 156 154 166 170 176
Left FE to NEET Q1 Q2 Q3 so far Q4 IN YEAR Target is 'less than last year' 20 26 36 82 ACTUAL 17 43 60
Page 3 of 25
YEAR 12/13 NEET BY WARD
West Middleton 5.8% West Heywood 2.2% Wardle and West Littleborough 0.0% Spotland and Falinge 4.0% South Middleton 0.0% Smallbridge and Firgrove 4.8% North Middleton 2.1% North Heywood 3.4% Norden 1.4% Milnrow and Newhey 2.2% Milkstone and Deeplish 2.3% Littleborough Lakeside 1.6% Kingsway 3.6% Hopwood Hall 1.2% Healey 4.3% East Middleton 2.1% Central Rochdale 3.6% Castleton 0.9% Bamford 3.4% Balderstone and Kirkholt 3.3% Borough 2.8%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0%
Page 4 of 25
EET
Total
Ward
NEET NEET
Unknown
-
UNKNOWN Total NEET
Percentage
UNAVAILABLE
NEET NEET
NEET NEET AVAILABLE Cohort
Borough 4889 129 12 61 5091 5030 141 2.8% Balderstone and Kirkholt 289 8 2 4 303 299 10 3.3% Bamford 168 6 0 7 181 174 6 3.4% Castleton 222 2 0 1 225 224 2 0.9% Central Rochdale 319 12 0 4 335 331 12 3.6% East Middleton 236 4 1 2 243 241 5 2.1% Healey 180 7 1 4 192 188 8 4.3% Hopwood Hall 248 3 0 3 254 251 3 1.2% Kingsway 378 13 1 4 396 392 14 3.6% Littleborough Lakeside 187 3 0 1 191 190 3 1.6% Milkstone and Deeplish 376 9 0 3 388 385 9 2.3% Milnrow and Newhey 220 5 0 0 225 225 5 2.2% Norden 144 2 0 4 150 146 2 1.4% North Heywood 200 5 2 6 213 207 7 3.4% North Middleton 233 4 1 1 239 238 5 2.1% Smallbridge and Firgrove 337 15 2 3 357 354 17 4.8% South Middleton 180 0 0 1 181 180 0 0.0% Spotland and Falinge 291 11 1 3 306 303 12 4.0% Wardle and West Littleborough 194 0 0 1 195 194 0 0.0% West Heywood 225 5 0 4 234 230 5 2.2% West Middleton 262 15 1 5 283 278 16 5.8%
Page 5 of 25
YEAR 12/13 NEET AS PERCENTAGE OF COHORT WORST WARD 7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0% Novembe Decembe April May June Quarter 1 July August Sept Quarter 2 October Quarter 3 January February March Quarter 4 r r LAST YEAR'S PERFORMANCE 6.0% 5.7% 5.6% 5.8% 5.5% 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 4.9% 5.9% 5.6% 5.5% ACTUAL (Yr 12/13) 5.6% 5.5% 6.0% 5.7% 4.2% 4.3% 5.8% 4.8%
NEET AS % OF COHORT - WORST
PERFORMING WARD
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March COHORT SIZE 11 10 11 14 12 16 NUMBERS 12 months ago 14 16 13 17 16 15
Page 6 of 25
YEAR 12/13 NEET BY TOWNSHIP
Pennine 2.6%
Heywood 2.7%
Middleton 2.4%
Rochdale 3.1%
Borough 2.8%
0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5%
Township EET NEET AVAILABLE NEET UNAVAILABLE UNKNOWN Total - Unknown Cohort NEET Total NEET Percentage Borough 4889 129 12 61 5091 5030 141 2.8% Rochdale 2367 70 5 34 2476 2442 75 3.1% Middleton 1159 26 3 12 1200 1188 29 2.4% Heywood 425 10 2 10 447 437 12 2.7% Pennine 938 23 2 5 968 963 25 2.6%
Page 7 of 25
YEAR 12/13 MONTHY COMPARISON - SIX WARDS WITH HIGHEST NEET RATES
YEAR 12/13 MONTHY COMPARISON - SIX WARDS WITH HIGHEST NEET RATES (This month's performance in the six highest wards from last month)
3.3% Balderston and Kirkholt 4.0%
3.6% Kingsway 3.8%
3.4% North Heywood 3.4%
3.6% Central Rochdale 3.6%
5.8% West Middleton 4.3%
4.8% Smallbridge and Firgrove 4.2%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% Smallbridge and Firgrove West Middleton Central Rochdale North Heywood Kingsway Balderston and Kirkholt Dec 4.8% 5.8% 3.6% 3.4% 3.6% 3.3% Nov 4.2% 4.3% 3.6% 3.4% 3.8% 4.0%
Page 8 of 25
YEAR 12/13 ANNUAL COMPARISON - SIX WARDS WITH HIGHEST NEET RATES (This month's performance in the six highest wards from twelve months ago)
4.4% Wardle and West Littleborough 0 5.4% Balderstone and Kirkholt 3.3% 3.8% Castleton 0.9% 4.0% Smallbridge and Firgrove 4.8% 2.1% North Middleton 2.1% 4.6% North Heywood 3.4%
0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Wardle and West North Heywood North Middleton Smallbridge and Firgrove Castleton Balderstone and Kirkholt Littleborough Dec-18 4.6% 2.1% 4.0% 3.8% 5.4% 4.4% Dec-19 3.4% 2.1% 4.8% 0.9% 3.3% 0
Page 9 of 25
NEET VOLUMES BY SCHOOL ATTENDED IN YEAR 11 The following tables are based on those who were in a school in the borough at Year 11, regardless of where they reside. It should not be compared with other NEET data in this report which looks at local residents. Consideration should also be given to differing cohorts when making like for like comparisons. – particularly in relation to special schools and PRUs.
YEAR 12 NEET BY SCHOOL
Wardle Academy 1.2%
St Cuthbert's RC High School 1.7%
St Anne's Academy 1.9%
Siddal Moor Sports College 0.6%
Redwood 0.0%
Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 0.8%
Middleton Technology School 0.9%
Matthew Moss High School 1.9%
Kingsway Park High School 1.8%
Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England… 0.0%
Hollingworth Academy 0.8%
Falinge Park High School 2.9%
Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 1.2%
Brownhill Learning Community 19.0%
Total 1.7%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
Page 10 of 25
%age
NEET NEET NEET
School NUMBERS Total 42 1.7% Brownhill Learning Community 11 19.0% Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 2 1.2% Falinge Park High School 7 2.9% Hollingworth Academy 2 0.8% Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 0 0.0% Kingsway Park High School 4 1.8% Matthew Moss High School 3 1.9% Middleton Technology School 2 0.9% Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 2 0.8% Redwood 0 0.0% Siddal Moor Sports College 1 0.6% St Anne's Academy 2 1.9% St Cuthbert's RC High School 3 1.7% Wardle Academy 3 1.2%
Page 11 of 25
YEAR 13 NEET BY SCHOOL
Wardle Academy 0.9%
St Cuthbert's RC High School 2.2%
St Anne's Academy 2.8%
Siddal Moor Sports College 1.9%
Redwood 0.0%
Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 1.3%
Middleton Technology School 0.5%
Matthew Moss High School 2.7%
Kingsway Park High School 4.7%
Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 1.8%
Hollingworth Academy 1.3%
Falinge Park High School 2.6%
Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 1.2%
Brownhill Learning Community 25.8%
Total 2.6%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Page 12 of 25
School
NEET NEET NUMBERS NEET age % Total 60 2.6% Brownhill Learning Community 17 25.8% Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 2 1.2% Falinge Park High School 6 2.6% Hollingworth Academy 3 1.3% Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 2 1.8% Kingsway Park High School 10 4.7% Matthew Moss High School 4 2.7% Middleton Technology School 1 0.5% Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 3 1.3% Redwood 0 0.0% Siddal Moor Sports College 3 1.9% St Anne's Academy 3 2.8% St Cuthbert's RC High School 4 2.2% Wardle Academy 2 0.9%
Page 13 of 25
YEAR 12/13 NEET BY SCHOOL
Wardle Academy 1.1%
St Cuthbert's RC High School 1.9%
St Anne's Academy 2.4%
Siddal Moor Sports College 1.3%
Redwood 0.0%
Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 1.0%
Middleton Technology School 0.7%
Matthew Moss High School 2.3%
Kingsway Park High School 3.2%
Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 0.9%
Hollingworth Academy 1.1%
Falinge Park High School 2.8%
Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 1.2%
Brownhill Learning Community 22.6%
Total 2.2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Page 14 of 25
AGO
NEET NEET age %
NEET NEET age %
LASTMONTH LASTMONTH
MONTHSAGO
TWOMONTHS
NEET NEET NUMBERS NEET NUMBERS NEET NEET NUMBERS
School NEET age % TWO Total 102 2.2% 97 2.0% 97 2.0% Brownhill Learning Community 28 22.6% 25 20.2% 19 15.3% Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 4 1.2% 3 0.9% 4 1.2% Falinge Park High School 13 2.8% 13 2.8% 11 2.3% Hollingworth Academy 5 1.1% 5 1.1% 7 1.5% Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 2 0.9% 1 0.4% 1 0.4% Kingsway Park High School 14 3.2% 16 3.7% 18 4.1% Matthew Moss High School 7 2.3% 7 2.3% 8 2.6% Middleton Technology School 3 0.7% 3 0.7% 3 0.7% Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 5 1.0% 6 1.2% 5 1.0% Redwood 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Siddal Moor Sports College 4 1.3% 4 1.3% 4 1.3% St Anne's Academy 5 2.4% 3 1.4% 3 1.4% St Cuthbert's RC High School 7 1.9% 6 1.6% 7 1.9% Wardle Academy 5 1.1% 5 1.1% 6 1.3%
Page 15 of 25
YEAR 12/13 UNKNOWN AND LAPSED 12.0%
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% <5% Novembe April May June Quarter 1 July August Sept Quarter 2 October December Quarter 3 January February March Quarter 4 r ACTUAL (Year 12/13) 3.9% 2.8% 2.4% 3.0% 10.8% 1.2% 0.9% 4.3% 0.0%
This table relates to those who are genuine “unknowns” and those whose destination is “lapsed.” NB: This table relates to those who are genuine “unknowns” and those whose destination is “lapsed.” “Unknown”, in National Client Caseload Information System (NCCIS) terms, means those young people whose education, training or employment status is not known at the time of the report. It also includes you people who are “lapsed”. Lapsed data covers those young people who were known to be in an identified destination, but the “currency” of that destination is now lapsed. The NCCIS system automatically lapses young people if their whereabouts has not been confirmed and updated.
May June July August Sept October November December January February March UNKNOWN AS % OF COHORT April ACTUAL NUMBERS 193 116 119 538 60 43 COHORT SIZE 4,899 4897 4,893 4,964 5,004 4,988 NUMBERS 12 months ago (Yr12-14 for207 Q1) 250 127 950 140 157 125 126 154
Page 16 of 25
YEAR 12/13 PARTICIPATION IN LEARNING 120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% Novembe Decembe April May June Quarter 1 July August Sept Quarter 2 October Quarter 3 January February March Quarter 4 r r LAST YEAR'S PERFORMANCE 90.8% 90.2% 91.8% 90.9% 91.8% 92.6% 93.1% 92.5% 93.5% 93.3% 93.0% 93.3% ACTUAL AS % OF COHORT 92.8% 93.7% 93.1% 93.2% 95.0% 95.9% 95.8% 95.6% 0.0%
YEAR 12s PARTICIPATING IN
May June July August Sept October November December January February March LEARNING April ACTUAL NUMBERS 2256 2,276 2,261 2,397 2,457 2,449 COHORT SIZE 2433 2431 2,430 2,523 2,563 2,556 NUMBERS 12 months ago (Yr12-14 for2235 Q1) 2,218 2,257 2,434 2,259 2,261 2,274 2,270 2,269
Page 17 of 25
YEAR 12 RPA BY SCHOOL ATTENDED IN YEAR 11
Wardle Academy 91.2%
St Cuthbert's RC High School 96.7%
St Anne's Academy 87.5%
Siddal Moor Sports College 91.5%
Redwood 97.9%
Oulder Hill Community School and Language College 94.2%
Middleton Technology School 92.4%
Matthew Moss High School 96.3%
Kingsway Park High School 89.1%
Holy Family Roman Catholic and Church of England College 95.8%
Hollingworth Academy 96.9%
Falinge Park High School 92.7%
Cardinal Langley Roman Catholic High School 90.9%
Brownhill Learning Community 64.1%
Total 92.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
This table is based on those who were in a local authority school at the end of Year 11, regardless of where they reside. It should not be compared with other participation data in this report which looks at local residents. Consideration should also be given to differing cohorts when making like for like comparisons. – particularly in relation to special schools and PRUs.
Page 18 of 25
SEND IN EET 16-19 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% April May June July August Sept October November December January February March LAST YEAR'S PERFORMANCE 85.1% 85.8% 85.1% 86.8% 85.9% 85.9% 84.7% 84.7% 83.6% ACTUAL AS % OF COHORT 83.6% 86.8% 83.2% 92.0% 92.0% 91.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
YOUNG PEOPLE WITH SEND IN EET (16-19)
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March ACTUAL NUMBERS 280 223 218 346 345 342 COHORT SIZE 335 257 262 376 375 374 COHORT SIZE 12 MONTHS AGO 268 273 268 289 286 286 282 282 280
Page 19 of 25
TEEN PARENTS IN EET 16-19 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% April May June July August Sept October November December January February March LAST YEARS PERFORMANCE 45.5% 43.3% 44.3% 41.9% 41.4% 44.4% 45.2% 45.0% 45.1% ACTUAL AS % OF COHORT 46.4% 43.8% 38.5% 42.4% 41.9% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TEENAGE PARENTS IN EET (16-19)
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March ACTUAL NUMBERS 39 35 30 28 26 21 COHORT SIZE 84 80 78 66 62 60 COHORT SIZE 12 MONTHS AGO 55 52 51 44 41 48 47 45 41
Page 20 of 25
CARE LEAVERS IN EET 16-19 90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0% April May June July August Sept October November December January February March LAST YEARS PERFORMANCE 77.3% 76.1% 75.3% 77.1% 79.4% 79.9% 78.2% 77.0% 75.6% ACTUAL AS % OF COHORT 76.3% 75.8% 72.9% 80.0% 83.4% 79.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
CARE LEAVERS IN EET (16-18 - including out of borough)
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March ACTUAL NUMBERS 132 135 129 140 146 138 COHORT SIZE 173 178 177 175 175 174 COHORT SIZE 12 MONTHS AGO 119 118 116 128 131 131 133 134 133
CCIS data relates to young people over school leaving age, who are Rochdale residents. This table is based on those in year 12 – 14 who are looked after by Rochdale borough – not just residents.
Page 21 of 25
Total 174 Apprenticeship 4 Destination Not Known 4 Employment NO training - Client at NVQ2 1 Employment NO training - Client Not at NVQ2 10 Employment WITH locally recognised training - Client NOT at 1 FE College 84 Higher Education 2 Illness 2 NEET - Seeking Employment or Training 16 NEET- Awaiting level 2 place 1 NEET- Not Yet Ready for Work 12 Other Govt Support (Non Employee) 2 Pregnancy (only use in 29th week or later) 1 School Year 12 9 School Year 13 4 School Year 14 2 Sixth Form College 8 Study Programme 8 Traineeship 3
Page 22 of 25
YOS IN EET 16-18 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% April May June July August Sept October November December January February March LAST YEARS PERFORMANCE 75.0% 77.5% 76.9% 71.2% 66.7% 64.2% 67.9% 77.4% 73.1% ACTUAL AS % OF COHORT 71.7% 72.2% 69.8% 71.7% 72.9% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
YOUNG OFFENDERS CURRENTLY SUPERVISED BY YOS IN
EET (16-18)
April May June July August Sept October November December January February March ACTUAL NUMBERS 38 39 37 43 35 32 COHORT SIZE 53 54 53 60 48 48 COHORT SIZE 12 MONTHS AGO 30 31 30 37 36 34 38 41 38
Page 23 of 25
STATISTICAL NEIGHBOUR AND NATIONAL COMPARISONS November (NB: figures are distorted by MOVING ON tracking on all areas)
Key Equal to or Better than national and statistical neighbour averages Equal to or Better than statistical neighbour averages, worse than national average Equal to or Better than national average, worse than statistical neighbour average Worse than both national and statistical neighbour averages
Academic Academic Age 16 - 17 Academic Academic Age Age 16 - 17 (Y12-Y13) Age16-17 (Y12- 16 - 17 (Y12- (Y12-13) In Y12 In Y13 In NEET & NK Y12 NEET & Y13 NEET & ID Y13) NEET % Y12 NEET% Y13 NEET% Y13) NK % Y12 NK% Y13 NK% Learning % Learning % Learning % % NK% NK%
Rochdale 354 2.7% 2.3% 3.1% 1.2% 0.7% 1.7% 94.7% 95.9% 93.4% 3.9% 3.0% 4.8% Statistical neighbours 3.1% 2.4% 3.8% 2.2% 1.2% 3.3% 92.9% 95.5% 90.2% 5.3% 3.5% 7.1% England Average 2.4% 1.7% 3.2% 5.6% 3.7% 7.5% 90.3% 93.7% 86.7% 8.1% 5.5% 10.7%
Academic Academic Academic Academic Age Age 16 - 17 Age 16 - 17 Age16-17 (Y12- 16 - 17 (Y12- (Y12-13) In Y12 In Y13 In (Y12-Y13) Y12 NEET & Y13 NEET & Rank (1=Closest) Name ID Y13) NEET % Y12 NEET% Y13 NEET% Y13) NK % Y12 NK% Y13 NK% Learning % Learning % Learning % NEET & NK NK% NK% 1 Oldham 353 2.6% 2.3% 3.0% 1.6% 1.3% 1.9% 94.2% 95.1% 93.3% 4.2% 3.5% 4.8% 2 Middlesbrough 806 4.1% 2.9% 5.3% 1.1% 0.5% 1.6% 93.8% 96.1% 91.4% 5.1% 3.4% 6.9% 3 Tameside 357 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 94.8% 95.2% 94.4% 3.9% 3.9% 3.8% 4 Bolton 350 3.8% 2.9% 4.8% 3.3% 1.6% 5.1% 90.8% 94.5% 86.9% 7.1% 4.5% 9.8% 5 Walsall 335 0.9% 0.7% 1.0% 4.5% 2.3% 6.6% 93.3% 96.2% 90.3% 5.3% 3.1% 7.6% 6 Kirklees 382 2.6% 1.9% 3.3% 1.9% 0.6% 3.2% 93.4% 96.4% 90.4% 4.5% 2.6% 6.5% 7 Rotherham 372 3.9% 2.8% 5.1% 3.5% 1.1% 5.9% 90.7% 95.4% 85.8% 7.4% 4.0% 11.0% 8 Stoke-on-Trent 861 2.9% 2.2% 3.6% 1.9% 1.4% 2.5% 93.3% 94.9% 91.4% 4.8% 3.6% 6.0% 9 Derby 831 4.1% 2.5% 5.6% 1.9% 1.5% 2.3% 91.4% 95.3% 87.5% 6.0% 4.1% 8.0% 10 Doncaster 371 3.1% 2.5% 3.6% 1.8% 0.3% 3.3% 93.5% 96.1% 90.9% 4.8% 2.8% 6.9%
Page 24 of 25
Page 25 of 25