Flight Muscle Developtnent and Dispersal in the Life Cycle of Carabid Beetles: Patterns and Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flight Muscle Developtnent and Dispersal in the Life Cycle of Carabid Beetles: Patterns and Processes BULL ETIN DE L'INSTITUT ROYA L DES SCIE 1CES NATURELLES DE BE LGIQUE ENTOMOLOG IE. 70: 13-31 . 2000 BULL ETI N VA I-l ET KON INKLIJ K BELGISCH I STITUUT VOOR NATUU RWETENSCHAPPEN E TOMOLOGIE. 70:, 13-31,2000 Flight muscle developtnent and dispersal in the life cycle of carabid beetles: patterns and processes by Konjev DESENDER Abstract Les deviations significatives observees pour une proportion plus im­ portante de coleopteres avec des muscles de vols fonctionnels chez des femelles non matures en comparaison avec celles matures indiquent un Seasonal patterns of fli ght muscle development are documented fo r 27 tel syndrome chez Ia plupart des especes de Carabidae etudiees. Ceci carabid species, collected from di fferent habitats. The ph enology or s'applique surtout aux especes qui emergent aI a fin du printemps, juste timing of their life cycle is compared to t he p resence o f a functional avant leur periode de reproduction en ete-automne. Le pourcentage de fli ght apparatus during complete year cycles. The majo ri ty of the femelles matures avec des muscles alaires fonctionnels differe entre investigated ground beetles have never b een stud ied b efore in this espi:ces et peut etre utilise comme une mesure d' un "'oogenesis-fli ght respect. In most species there is a di stinct seasonal pattern of fli ght syndrome" ma ins deterministe. L'analyse globale de tous les resultats muscle functionality. Some species, with similar life cycle timing a nd/ suggere que les caracteristiques suivantes interviennent comme fac­ or similar habitat requirements, show the same pattern of fli ght muscle teurs expliquants les profil s o bserves au ni veau des muscles de vol: development. Inter- and intraspecific v ariability in maximal propor­ choix de !'habitat, evolution du cycle de vie, ainsi que d'autres eie" tions o f beetl es with functional flight muscles indicates fli ght muscle ments de Ia vie de l' insecte. Le developpement des muscles devol des dimorphism. The reproducti ve state of fe males (obtained through dis­ Carabidae semble di:s lors faire partie d' un ensemble de caracteres section of the ovaries) is used to test the generality of an "oogenesis­ coadaptes. fli ght syndrome" (trade-off between dispersal and reproduction), the null hypothesis being that functional fl ight m uscul ature and ripe ova­ Mots-clefs: Carabidae, pouvoir de dispersion, cycle de vie, developpe­ ri es occur independently. Observed signi ficant d eviations towards a ment des muscles alaires, oogenesis-flight syndrome, reproduction, hi gher proportion of beetles with fi.mctional fl ight muscles in unripe as dimorphisme alaire, adaptations, caracti:res coadaptes compared to ripe females indicate such a syndrome in most of the species studied. It is especially true for species emerging during late spring before their summer-autumn reproduction. The proportion of ripe females with functional fli ght muscles differs between species and can be used as a measure for a less deterministic version of an Introduction "oogenesis-flight" syndrome. A complex of factors must play a role in the expression of fli ght muscle development. Integrati on of all results s uggests habitat choice, evolu tion of life cycle timing and other [n many insect groups, species are known to show poly­ life hi story traits as ultimate factors responsible for the observed morphisms affecting their fl ight ability. The most obvious patterns of flight muscle fun ctionali ty. Flight muscle development in examples are variations in wing and fli ght muscle devel­ ground beetl es therefore seems to be part of a suite of coadapted traits. opment (HARR ISON, 1980). Wing polymorphisms are un­ Key wonls: Carabidae, dispersal p ower, life cycle, fli ght muscle der genetic and environmental control (HARRISON, 1980; development, oogenesis-flight syndrome, reproduction, wing dimor­ ROFF, 1986). phism, adaptations, sui te of coadapted t ra its Numerous observations indicate that in many insect species migration is limited t o t he post-teneral, pre-re­ productive period. These observations have led to define Resume the " oogenesis-flight syndrome" as a characteristic of insect migration (JOH NSON, 1969; for Coleoptera, see f. e. Les pro til s saisonniers du developpement des muscles alai res sont Ll NDERS et a\., 1995, MUDA et a\. , 198 1, RANKIN et a\. , reportes pour 27 especes de Carabidae, recoltees dans des habitats differents. Durant des cycles annuels complets, Ia phenologie ou Ia 1994, TADA et al. , 1991) . The inherent assumption is that periode du cycle v ital est comparee pour chaque espece i1 Ia presence mi gration (through fli ght d ispersal by means of fu nc­ d ' un appa reil devol fonctionnel. La majorite des especes de Carabidae tional fl ight muscles and developed hind wi ngs) and concernees n 'a jamais ete etudiee SOLI S eel angle avant ce travail. Chez Ia plupart des especes, il y a un cycle saisonnier de Ia foncti onnali te des reproduction are alternating physiological states. This muscles alaires. Certaines es peces qui ont un cycle de vie e t/ou des view was strengthened by the fact that migration in many exigences environnementales similaires demontrent le meme profil cases is associated with or induced by conditions promo­ saisonnier au ni veau des muscles devol. Si l'on considi:re Ia periode du cycle de vie otl le developpement des muscles de vol est le plus ting a dult diapause (i.o. w. delaying reproduction), for important, on constate une vari abilite inter- et in traspecifique, ce qui example a s horter photoperiod, lower t emperatures or suggere un dimorphisme de muscles alai res. L 'eta! reproducti f d es poor f ood conditions (RANKIN et a\. , 1986). Migrating fe melles (obtenu apres dissection des ovaires) est utilise pour t ester insects moreover often are physiologically comparabl e Ia presence d' un " oogenesis-fl ight syndrom.e" (balance entre d isper­ sion et reproduction), !' hypothese nulle etant qu· une muscul ature alaire to cli apausing insects in their possession of hypertrophic fonctionnell c et Ia maturi te des ovaires apparaissent independamment. fat bodi es and immature ovaries. Studies on the physio- 14 Konjev DESENDER '' logy and endocrinology of flight muscle degeneration and production) and is related to habitat change (TIETZE, regeneration, in a few insect species, have suggested a 1963 ; VAN Hui ZEN, 1977). Flying females were always control by juvenile hormone (FAIRBAIRN & Y ADLOWSKI, unripe. According to DEN BOER eta!. ( 1980) some species I 997; ZERA et al., 1997). A strong negative correlation (Amara.familiaris, Anisodactylus binotatus, Calathus ro­ has commonly been observed between flight muscle mass tundicollis and Nebria brevicollis) deviate more or less and ovarian mass of insects (ROFF, I 986), suggesting that from an "oogenesis-flight" syndrome. In Nebria brevi­ the construction and maintenance of the flight apparatus col/is developing flight muscles were found in immature competes with egg production for a limited internal nu­ beetles (i.e. in spring) more than in reproducing beetles trient pool (ZERA & DENNO, 1997). The metabolic rates of (in autumn), while at least some flight activity was ob­ flying insects can be 20-100 times that of resting animals served during autumn too (N ELEM ANS, 1987). MATALIN and are among the highest known (RANKIN & BURCHSTED, ( 1994, 1997) and ZHANG et a!. ( 1997) studied Harpalus 1991 ). Nevertheless, several authors ( cf. GATEHOUS E & rujipes and came to the conclusion that flight was more ZHANG, 1995) have chall enged the assumption that the prevalent in (but not limited to) young beetles before oogenesis-flight syndrome is a general phenomenon. reproduction. MEIJER ( 1974) suggested variation in flight Ground beetles are well-known for their varying de­ behaviour of the small Bembidion varium (always posses­ gree of hind wing development. Some species are con­ sing functional flight muscles): in spring relatively more stantly winged, others show a wing polymorphism or unripe females were recorded flying as compared to wing dimorphism and some species always possess re­ reproducing ones. duced wings. Carabid beetles consequently exhibit a large Clearly, there is a considerable lack of empirical data amount of variation in their respective dispersal power. on most carabid beetles in this respect. To this end, we Wing development is largely under direct genetic control have dissected large numbers of ground beetles collected in the few ground beetle species studied so far (cf. Au­ during complete year cycles in a multitude of habitats and KEMA, 1986; DESENDER, 1989a; LINDROTH, 1946). About belonging to 27 different species (20 constantly macro­ three-quarters or as much as 280 carabid species from pterous, seven wing dimorphic or polymorphic). These Belgium are known to be constantly macropterous or full­ species can be roughly divided into spring breeders (adult winged. Nevertheless wing development and, as a con­ hibernators) on the one hand and summer-autumn bree­ sequence, fli ght capacity are extremely variable between ders (larval or larval/adult hibernators) on the other hand. winged species too, as has been shown on the basis of a In this paper, we will first look at seasonal patterns of biometric approach (DEN BOER et al., 1980; DESENDE R et fli ght muscle development by comparing the phenology a!., 1986; DESENDER, 1989b ). Many winged ground beet­ or timing of the life cycle in each species to the relative les moreover not necessarily possess functional flight occurrence of a functional flight apparatus. Secondly, the muscles. Below a certain value of relative wing size, reproductive state of females (obtained through dissec­ functional flight muscles apparently are only rarely ob­ tion of the ovaries) will be used to test the generality of served (D EN BOER et a!., 1980; DESENDER, 1989b ).
Recommended publications
  • Variations in Carabidae Assemblages Across The
    Original scientific paper DOI: /10.5513/JCEA01/19.1.2022 Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2018, 19(1), p.1-23 Variations in Carabidae assemblages across the farmland habitats in relation to selected environmental variables including soil properties Zmeny spoločenstiev bystruškovitých rôznych typov habitatov poľnohospodárskej krajiny v závislosti od vybraných environmentálnych faktorov vrátane pôdnych vlastností Beáta BARANOVÁ1*, Danica FAZEKAŠOVÁ2, Peter MANKO1 and Tomáš JÁSZAY3 1Department of Ecology, Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, University of Prešov in Prešov, 17. novembra 1, 081 16 Prešov, Slovakia, *correspondence: [email protected] 2Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Management, University of Prešov in Prešov, Slovenská 67, 080 01 Prešov, Slovakia 3The Šariš Museum in Bardejov, Department of Natural Sciences, Radničné námestie 13, 085 01 Bardejov, Slovakia Abstract The variations in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages across the three types of farmland habitats, arable land, meadows and woody vegetation were studied in relation to vegetation cover structure, intensity of agrotechnical interventions and selected soil properties. Material was pitfall trapped in 2010 and 2011 on twelve sites of the agricultural landscape in the Prešov town and its near vicinity, Eastern Slovakia. A total of 14,763 ground beetle individuals were entrapped. Material collection resulted into 92 Carabidae species, with the following six species dominating: Poecilus cupreus, Pterostichus melanarius, Pseudoophonus rufipes, Brachinus crepitans, Anchomenus dorsalis and Poecilus versicolor. Studied habitats differed significantly in the number of entrapped individuals, activity abundance as well as representation of the carabids according to their habitat preferences and ability to fly. However, no significant distinction was observed in the diversity, evenness neither dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) Deposited in the Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain
    Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 12(2014): 13–82 ISSN:Viñolas 1698 & –Masó0476 The collection of type specimens of the family Carabidae (Coleoptera) deposited in the Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain A. Viñolas & G. Masó Viñolas, A. & Masó, G., 2014. The collection of type specimens of the family Carabidae (Coleoptera) deposited in the Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain. Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 12: 13–82. Abstract The collection of type specimens of the family Carabidae (Coleoptera) deposited in the Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain.— The type collection of the family Carabidae (Coleop- tera) deposited in the Natural History Museum of Barcelona, Spain, has been organised, revised and documented. It contains 430 type specimens belonging to 155 different taxa. Of note are the large number of hypogean species, the species of Cicindelidae from Asenci Codina’s collection, and the species of Harpalinae extracted from Jacques Nègre’s collec- tion. In this paper we provide all the available information related to these type specimens. We therefore provide the following information for each taxon, species or subspecies: the original and current taxonomic status, original citation of type materials, exact transcription of original labels, and preservation condition of specimens. Moreover, the differences between original descriptions and labels are discussed. When a taxonomic change has occurred, the references that examine those changes are included at the end of the taxa description. Key words: Collection type, Coleoptera, Carabidae taxonomic revision family, Ground beetles. Resumen La colección de ejemplares tipo de la familia Carabidae(Coleoptera) depositados en el Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona, España.— Se ha organizado, revisado y documentado la colección de especímenes tipo de la familia Carabidae (Coleoptera) de- positados en el Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • Assemblages of Carabid Beetles (Col. Carabidae) and Ground-Dwelling Spiders (Araneae) in Natural and Artificial Regeneration of Pine Forests
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 19(2): 156-167, 2018 1585-8553 © AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ, BUDAPEST DOI: 10.1556/168.2018.19.2.8 Assemblages of carabid beetles (Col. Carabidae) and ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in natural and artificial regeneration of pine forests A. Kosewska1,3, E. Topa1, M. Nietupski1 and R. Kędzior2 1Department of Entomology, Phytopathology and Molecular Diagnostic, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawochenskiego 17, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland 2Department of Ecology, Climatology and Air Protection, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland 3Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Ground beetles, Ground-living spiders, Pine forest regeneration. Abstract: Carabid beetles and spiders are at the top of the hierarchy of general invertebrate predators, which can help to reduce the abundance of harmful forest pests. They are also frequently used as environmental indicators. In this paper we analyzed the abundance, species richness and changes in carabid beetle and spider assemblages in three treatments of pine forest regenera- tion – natural, natural with soil prepared by ploughing and artificial with seedlings planted in ploughed soil. The most beneficial forest regeneration treatment variant of forest regeneration for carabid beetles and spiders was the natural regeneration of pine stands without any preceding soil preparation. Both taxa responded strongly to soil ploughing. We also noted the replacement of forest species by less sensitive open area species. In carabid assemblages, large changes in the trophic structure were observed, as predatory species were replaced by hemizoophages in the ploughed treatments. NOMENC -- ABBREVI OAS, GLM etc Introduction to forest regeneration for which the potential benefits jus- tify its use in Polish forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabids and Other Beneficial Arthropods in Cereal Crops and Permanent Grasslands and Influence of Field and Landscape Parameters D
    Carabids and other beneficial arthropods in cereal crops and permanent grasslands and influence of field and landscape parameters D. Massaloux To cite this version: D. Massaloux. Carabids and other beneficial arthropods in cereal crops and permanent grasslands and influence of field and landscape parameters. Biodiversity and Ecology. AgroParisTech, 2020. English. tel-02886480v2 HAL Id: tel-02886480 https://hal-agroparistech.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02886480v2 Submitted on 9 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2020 IAVF 0012 THESE DE DOCTORAT préparée à l’Institut des sciences et industries du vivant et de l’environnement (AgroParisTech) pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de l’Institut agronomique vétérinaire et forestier de France Spécialité : Écologie École doctorale n°581 Agriculture, alimentation, biologie, environnement et santé (ABIES) par Damien MASSALOUX Influence du paysage et de la parcelle sur les diversités de carabes et d’autres arthropodes en céréales et prairies permanentes Directeur de thèse : Alexander Wezel Co-encadrement de la thèse : Benoit Sarrazin Thèse présentée et soutenue à Lyon le 22 juin 2020 Composition du jury : M. Pierre-Henri Gouyon, Professeur, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Rapporteur M.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) by Laboulbenialean Fungi in Different Habitats
    Eur. J. Entomol. 107: 73–79, 2010 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1511 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Incidence of infection of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) by laboulbenialean fungi in different habitats SHINJI SUGIURA1, KAZUO YAMAZAKI 2 and HAYATO MASUYA1 1Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 2Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, Osaka 543-0026, Japan Key words. Coleoptera, Carabidae, ectoparasitic fungi, Ascomycetes, Laboulbenia, microhabitat, overwintering sites Abstract. The prevalence of obligate parasitic fungi may depend partly on the environmental conditions prevailing in the habitats of their hosts. Ectoparasitic fungi of the order Laboulbeniales (Ascomycetes) infect arthropods and form thalli on the host’s body sur- face. Although several studies report the incidence of infection of certain host species by these fungi, quantitative data on laboulbe- nialean fungus-host arthropod interactions at the host assemblage level are rarely reported. To clarify the effects of host habitats on infection by ectoparasitic fungi, the incidence of infection by fungi of the genus Laboulbenia (Laboulbeniales) of overwintering carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in three habitats, a riverside (reeds and vines), a secondary forest and farmland (rice and vegetable fields), were compared in central Japan. Of the 531 adults of 53 carabid species (nine subfamilies) collected in the three habitats, a Laboulbenia infection of one, five and one species of the carabid subfamilies Pterostichinae, Harpalinae and Callistinae, respectively, was detected. Three species of fungus were identified: L. coneglanensis, L. pseudomasei and L. fasciculate. The inci- dence of infection by Laboulbenia was higher in the riverside habitat (8.97% of individuals; 14/156) than in the forest (0.93%; 2/214) and farmland (0%; 0/161) habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboulbeniomycetes, Eni... Historyâ
    Laboulbeniomycetes, Enigmatic Fungi With a Turbulent Taxonomic History☆ Danny Haelewaters, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States; Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Universidad Autónoma ̌ de Chiriquí, David, Panama; and University of South Bohemia, Ceské Budejovice,̌ Czech Republic Michał Gorczak, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland Patricia Kaishian, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States and State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, United States André De Kesel, Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meredith Blackwell, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States and University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States r 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Roland Thaxter to the Present: Synergy Among Mycologists, Entomologists, Parasitologists Laboulbeniales were discovered in the middle of the 19th century, rather late in mycological history (Anonymous, 1849; Rouget, 1850; Robin, 1852, 1853; Mayr, 1853). After their discovery and eventually their recognition as fungi, occasional reports increased species numbers and broadened host ranges and geographical distributions; however, it was not until the fundamental work of Thaxter (1896, 1908, 1924, 1926, 1931), who made numerous collections but also acquired infected insects from correspondents, that the Laboulbeniales became better known among mycologists and entomologists. Thaxter set the stage for progress by describing a remarkable number of taxa: 103 genera and 1260 species. Fewer than 25 species of Pyxidiophora in the Pyxidiophorales are known. Many have been collected rarely, often described from single collections and never encountered again. They probably are more common and diverse than known collections indicate, but their rapid development in hidden habitats and difficulty of cultivation make species of Pyxidiophora easily overlooked and, thus, underreported (Blackwell and Malloch, 1989a,b; Malloch and Blackwell, 1993; Jacobs et al., 2005; Gams and Arnold, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • New and Unpublished Data About Bulgarian Ground Beetles from the Tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
    Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 125–141 (2021) doi: 10.3897/abs.7.e67015 https://abs.pensoft.net RESEARCH ARTICLE New and unpublished data about Bulgarian ground beetles from the tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Teodora Teofilova1 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria. Corresponding author: Teodora Teofilova ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 6 April 2021 | Accepted 22 April 2021 | Published 20 May 2021 http://zoobank.org/53E9E1F4-2338-494C-870D-F3DA4AA4360B Citation: Teofilova T (2021) New and unpublished data about Bulgarian ground beetles from the tribes Pterostichini, Sphodrini, and Platynini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 125–141. https://doi. org/10.3897/abs.7.e67015 Abstract Bulgarian ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) fauna is relatively well studied but there are still many species and regions in the country which are not well researched. The present study aims at complementing the data about the distribution of the carabids from the tribes Pterostichini, Spho- drini, and Platynini, containing many diverse, interesting, and endemic species. It gives new records for 67 species and 23 zoogeographical regions in Bulgaria. The material was collected in the period from 1926 to 2021 through different sampling methods. Twenty-three species are recorded for the first time in different regions. Six species are reported for the second time in the regions where they were currently collected. Thirty-one species have not been reported for more than 20 years in Eastern and Middle Stara Planina Mts., Kraishte region, Boboshevo-Simitli valley, Sandanski-Petrich valley, Lyulin Mts., Vitosha Mts., Rila Mts., Pirin Mts., Slavyanka Mts., Thracian Lowland, and Sakar-Tundzha re- gion.
    [Show full text]
  • Traits in the Light of Ecology and Conservation of Ground Beetles
    Traits in the light of ecology and conservation of ground beetles Von der Fakultät Nachhaltigkeit der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg zur Erlangung des Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. – genehmigte Dissertation von Dorothea Irmgard Ilse Nolte geb. Ehlers am 18.07.1987 in Bielefeld 2018 Eingereicht am: 09. November 2018 Mündliche Verteidigung am: 25. September 2019 Erstbetreuer und Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Thorsten Assmann Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Tamar Dayan Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Pietro Brandmayr Die einzelnen Beiträge des kumulativen Dissertationsvorhabens sind oder werden ggf. inkl. des Rahmenpa- piers wie folgt veröffentlicht: Nolte, D., Boutaud, E., Kotze, D. J., Schuldt, A., and Assmann, T. (2019). Habitat specialization, distribution range size and body size drive extinction risk in carabid beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 1267-1283. Nolte, D., Schuldt, A., Gossner, M.M., Ulrich, W. and Assmann, T. (2017). Functional traits drive ground beetle community structures in Central European forests: Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 213, 5–12. Homburg, K., Drees, C., Boutaud, E., Nolte, D., Schuett, W., Zumstein, P., von Ruschkowski, E. and Assmann, T. (2019). Where have all the beetles gone? Long-term study reveals carabid species decline in a nature reserve in Northern Germany. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 12, 268-277. Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019 "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein Nature awakens a great fascination in all of us and gives us a feeling of balance and peace of mind. Wherever you look, there is always something to discover. The plethora of habitats, species and various adaptation strategies is the true secret of nature’s success.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O19749
    Oikos o19749 Gerisch, M., Agostinelli, V., Henle, K. and Dziock, F. 2011. More species, but all do the same: contrasting effects of flood disturbance on ground beetle functional and species diversity. – Oikos 121: 508–515. Appendix A1 Tabelle1 Table A1. Full species list representing the standardized number of individuals per species for the study sites Steckby, Woerlitz, and Sandau. Density expresses the proportion of species standardized abundances to total abundance. Macropterous = winged, brachypterous = wingless, dimorphic = both forms can appear with a species. Body size is the average of maximum and minimum values found in the literature (for references see below). Wing Reproduction Body size Species names Steckby Woerlitz Sandau Density Morphology Season In mm Acupalpus dubius 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 2.6 Acupalpus exiguus 1.838 1.019 0.71 0.005 macropterous spring 2.7 Acupalpus parvulus 0.081 0.038 0.032 0 macropterous spring 3.6 Agonum dolens 0.032 0.038 0.081 0 dimorph spring 8.8 Agonum duftschmidi 14.966 2.755 0.016 0.025 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum emarginatum 116.659 4.472 25.194 0.208 macropterous spring 7.2 Agonum fuliginosum 0.097 0.038 0 0 dimorph spring 6.7 Agonum lugens 0.177 0 0.081 0 macropterous spring 9 Agonum marginatum 0.371 0.075 0.113 0.001 macropterous spring 9.2 Agonum micans 19.502 4.208 23.71 0.067 macropterous spring 6.6 Agonum muelleri 0 0.019 0 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum piceum 0.468 0 0.016 0.001 macropterous spring 6.4 Agonum sexpunctatum 0.032 0 0.016 0 macropterous spring 8.2 Agonum
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the XIV European Carabidologists Meeting, Westerbork, 14-18 September, 2009”, Vol
    18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 FINANCIAL SUPPORT We thank all the partners who provided their technical and financial support for the organisation of the 18th European Carabidologist Meeting: … 18th European Carabidologist Meeting – Rennes 25-29 September 2017 SCIENTIFIC BOARD President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Manuel PLANTEGENEST, Agrocampus-ouest, UMR IGEPP, Rennes, France Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes, France Marc Dufrêne, Liege University - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Gembloux, Belgium Lovei Gabor, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark Guénola Péres, Agrocampus-Ouest, UMR SAS, Rennes, France Julien Pétillon, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes, France Roberto Pizzoloto, Università della Calabria – Dept. B.E.S.T., Rende, Italy David Renault, Université Rennes 1, UMR Ecobio, Rennes, France Pavel Saska, Crop Research Institute, Praha, Czech Republik Lucija Šerić Jelaska, Croatian Ecological Society, Zagreb, Croatia José Serrano, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain John Spence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Yann Tricault, Agrocampus Ouest, UMR IGEPP, Angers, France STEERING COMMITTEE President: Elsa CANARD, INRA, UMR IGEPP, Rennes Secretary: Isabelle BAUMGARTEN, Agrocampus-ouest, Rennes Members: Audrey Alignier, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Stéphanie Aviron, INRA, UMR BAGAP, Rennes Françoise Burel, CNRS, UMR Ecobio, Rennes El Aziz Djoudi, EA Biodiversité et Gestion des Territoires, Rennes Romain
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 4 Part 2. Coleoptera. Carabidae
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON . Vol. IV. Part 2 -HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION / OF BRITISH INSECT-s COLEOPTERA CARABIDAE By CARL H. LINDROTH LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms .p, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 August I 974- HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows: I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. , 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. , 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. II. Hemiptera. III. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera : lchneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera : Cyclorrhapha. Volumes II to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specifyin advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this series, and each part is the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists. Although much of the work is based on existing published keys, suitably adapted, much new and original matter is also included.
    [Show full text]