Expressing the Security Council's Conviction That the Situation in South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expressing the Security Council's Conviction That the Situation in South Part II 213 “3. Deprecates the non-compliance of the Govern- tion existing in South .\frica. The resolution also ment of Portugal with the resolution of 31 July 1963; called for “concerted meascres of sanction against the Government of South Africa”. “4, Reaffirms the interpretation of self-determi- nation as laid down in General I’\ssembly resolution M the 1040th meeting on 23 Ju1y 1963, the Security 1514 (XV) as follows: Council decided to include the question in the agenda.w The Council considered the question at its 1050th to “‘Ml peoples have the right to self-determination; 1056th meetings, from 31 .Julv to 7 August 1963. by virtue of that right they freely determine their The representatives of Tunisia, tiLiberia, Sierra L,eone political status and freely pursue their economic, and Madagascar were invited to take part in the social and cultural development’; discussion. ‘29 “5, Kotes General Assembly resolution 1542 (XV) At the 1050th meeting on 31 July 1963, the President which enumerated, inter alia, Territories under (Morocco) recalled that the Council at its 103&t Portuguese administration as falling under the cate- meeting had decided to invite the representative of gory of &on-Self-Governing Territories within the the Republic of South Africa. to take part in the con- meaning of Chapter XI of the Charter; sideration of the question.“-“/ .a telegram to this effect “6. Believes that action by the Government of had been sent to the Government of South Africa. The Portugal to grant an amnesty to all persons im- reply had just been received, and it indicated that the prisoned or exiled for advocating self-determination Government of South Africa declined the invitation of in these Territories will be an evidence of its good the Council. The letterwfrom the permanent repre- faith; sentative of South Africa-which was read to the Council-stated that the South African Government “7. Requests the Secretary-General to continue had decided not to participate in the discussion of with his efforts and report to the Council not later the Council on matters u?ich it considered to fall than 1 June 1964.” solely within its domestic jurisdiction. The letter The question remained on the list of matters of which also stated that the African States that-had-segbmitted the Security Council is sei2ed.w the item had “tried to justify their hostility and inter- ference in South Africa’s domestic affairs by relying THE QUESTION OF RACE CONFLICT IN on the totally unfounded allegation that South Africa SOUTH AFRICA is a threat to international peace and security”. It was the view of the South African Government that these IMTIAL PROCEEDIKGS African States, or some among them, had threatened peace and order in southern Africa and had initiated By lettersdated 11 July 1963, the representatives of Algeria, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African preparations for the use of force against South Republic, Chad, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Leo- Africa. Evidence of their intentions could be found poidvii& I&tior,+, Er;hiopia, Gabon, Gi;,:.-. -, Guinea, i?. the relevant paragraph s of resolutions adopted by Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Mali, the African States at their recent conference in Mauritania, Morocco, Mger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Addis Ababa, and in the reported statements of Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tanganyika, Togo, certain African leaders, In this regard, reference Tunisia, Uganda: United Arab Republic and Upper leas made to contributions offered by several African States to finance militarv and other activities en- Volta requested the President of the Security Council ” to convene an early meeting of the Council “to con- visaged against South Africa. This “active incitement from abroad and systematic encouragement and sub- . sider the explosive situation existing in the Republic of South Africa, which constitutes a serious threat to sidization of the small groups of subversive Rantu, international peace and security”. supported by Communist elements and fellou* travel- lers in South Africa” had recentlv compelled the Stating that the situation stemmed from the apartheid South African Government to assume increased legis- policies of the Government of the Republic of South lative powers for the maintenance of order and Africa, the representatives of the African States stability, The South African Government had decided urged the SecuritJV Council to take the necessary action therefore that “no useful purpose would be served by to find a solution, “due to the systematic refusal of re-stating its case at the Security Council”. that Government to comply with the relevant resolu- tions of the General Assembly and the Security Coun- Decision of 7 August 1963 (1056th meeting): cil”. It was noted further that “the extreme gravity of 0i Expressing the Security Council’s conviction the situation” had been a matter of “deep concern” to that the situation in South Africa was seriously the Heads of State and Governments of the Independent disturbing intema tional peace and security; *African States who had met at the Conference of (ii) Deprecating s tron& the policies of South Addis Ababa from 22 to 25 hlavw 1963, and had Africa in its perpetuation of racial discriminq- adopted a resolution on this question, the relevant fion as being inconsistent with the principles provisions of lthhich were quoted in an attached contained in the Charter, and contrary to its memorandum, The resolution, in part, called for the dispatch of a delegation of the Foreign Ministers 5 1040th meeting: para. 6. of Liberia, Madagascar, Sierra Leone and Tunisia Wf 1050th meeting: para. 4. to inform the Security Council of the explosive situa- ???f 1050th meeting: para. 5. For ccrsderatlor. concerr.lr,g tie ques- Uon of the effect of the extezsior. of the lnvltatlon, see chapter III, .Sdl/ S/5500. Case 26. 5.32/ S+/5341j, O.R, 18th year, Supp. for July-Sept. 1363, pp. 11-l-1. w S/53dl, 1OSOth meeting: para. c. 214 Chapter VIII. Maintenance of international peace and security obligations as a Member State of the United been greatly aggravated by an accelerated arms Nations; build-up and by the increasingly provocative attitude (iii) Calling upon the Government of South Africa of the South African Government, Its arms build-up to a bandon the policies of apartheid and racial and its multiplicity of 1~~s against freedom consti- discrimination, and to liberate all persons sub- tuted the greatest threat to peace and security on jet ted to prison or other restrictions for ha vi@ the African continent, Besides, that Government was opposed the policies of apartheid; extending its policies and practices to the territory Calling solemnly upon all States to cease forth- of South West Africa, which it had unlawfully occu- with the sale and shipment ofarms, ammunition pied. The United Nations, to be true to its Charter, of all types and military vehicles to South could not any longer tolerate the presence in South Africa; West Africa of the Government of South Africa, or the 0V Requesting the Secretary-General to keep the extension to that territory of the doctrine and policies situation in South Africa under observation of apartheid imposed by that Government. In conclusion and to report to the Security Council by it was stated that the Heads of the African States of 30 October 1963 the Organization of African Unity wished to add their plea to those of the General Assembly and the Special The Foreign Ministers of Sierra Leone*, Tunisia*, Committee that the Security Council would adopt the Madagascar * and Liberia *, speaking at the 1050th and measures provided in the Charter and recommended 1051st meetings on behalf of all African member by the Special Committee to compel the Government States of the Organization of African Unity, stated that of the Republic of South *Africa to abandon, before it the findings and recommendations of the Special Com- was too late, its present collision course. The mittee of the General Assembly on the policies of African representatives also urged the Council to give apartheid of the Government of South Africa were full support to General Assembly resolution 1761 supported in a resolution that had been unanimously (XVII) . 587/ adopted at the Addis Ababa Conference of that Organization. At the 1054th meeting on 6 -4ugust 1963, the repre- sentative of Ghana introduced a draf; resdiution-w In reviewing the past history of the question, they jointly sponsored with Yorocco and the Philippines. called attention to the fact that the South African Government had continued to disregard the resolu- According to operative paragraph 3 of the draft tions of the General Assembly and the Security resolution, the Council would call upon all States Council which had called upon that Government to to boycott all South African goods and to refrain from revise its policies and bring them into conformity exporting to South Africa strategic materials of with its obligations and responsibilities under the direct military value. Charter of the United Kations. They further remarked At the 1056th meeting on 7 August 1963, upon the that the only reason which had been given by the request of the representative of the United States, Government of South Africa for its disregard of the a separate vote was taken on operative paragraph 3, resolutions against its policies of apartheid was to which was not acropted. There were 5 votes in favour, state that the United Nations was not authorized none against, and 6 abstentions, =The draft reso- under the Charter to intervene in matters which lution, as amended, was then adopted by 9 votes in * were essentially within the domestic jurisdiction favour, none against, and 2 abstenti0ns.m of any State. In their view, the validity of Article 2 (7) was not disputed but those who drew up the The resolution ‘aread* .
Recommended publications
  • An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2001 The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963. Christina Paige Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Christina Paige, "The ndE of Camelot: An Examination of the Presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1963." (2001). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 114. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/114 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Arts in History _______________ by Christina Paige Jones May 2001 _______________ Dr. Elwood Watson, Chair Dr. Stephen Fritz Dr. Dale Schmitt Keywords: John F. Kennedy, Civil Rights, Vietnam War ABSTRACT THE END OF CAMELOT: AN EXAMINATION OF THE PRESIDENCY OF JOHN F. KENNEDY IN 1963 by Christina Paige Jones This thesis addresses events and issues that occurred in 1963, how President Kennedy responded to them, and what followed after Kennedy’s assassination. This thesis was created by using books published about Kennedy, articles from magazines, documents, telegrams, speeches, and Internet sources.
    [Show full text]
  • August 1963 M
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Turf Bulletin Turf Program 1963 August 1963 M. A. McKenzie E. S. Pira Joseph A. Keohane A. Kacperska-Palacz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/turf_bulletin Part of the Plant Breeding and Genetics Commons, and the Weed Science Commons McKenzie, M. A.; Pira, E. S.; Keohane, Joseph A.; and Kacperska-Palacz, A., "August 1963" (1963). Turf Bulletin. 7. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/turf_bulletin/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Turf Program at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Turf Bulletin by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Massacnusetts Turf and Lawn Grass Council INCORPORATED BETTER TURF THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION (urf J6ulleti11 Vol. 2, No. 2 August, 1963 Shade Tree Laboratories Why Irrigate? M. A. McKenzie, Experiment Stat'ion, UMass. E. S. Pira, Assistant Prof. The Shade Tree Laboratories at the University Agricultural Engineering Dept. of Massachusetts occupy a building which was Univers·ity of Massachusetts completed in 1948 to provide facilities especially The question of whether supplemental irriga­ designed for the particular needs of basic and ap­ tion is needed in Massachusetts seems to plague plied research in shade tree problems. At that us especially after a period of drought ocurring time the current tree program had already been during the growing season. For example, the year in operation for 13 years in the Experiment Sta­ 1957; interest in supplemental irrigation reached tion with a major interest in the Dutch elm dis­ a peak.
    [Show full text]
  • August 28, 1963: Building Community Through Collective Discourse
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-1-2012 August 28, 1963: Building Community through Collective Discourse Jennifer Nestelberger University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the African American Studies Commons, Rhetoric Commons, Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Repository Citation Nestelberger, Jennifer, "August 28, 1963: Building Community through Collective Discourse" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1602. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332583 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AUGUST 28, 1963: BUILDING COMMUNITY THROUGH COLLECTIVE DISCOURSE by Jennifer Lynn Nestelberger Bachelor of Arts University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Communication Studies Department of Communication Studies Greenspun College of Urban Affairs The Graduate College University of Nevada Las Vegas May 2012 Copyright by Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenhower, Dwight D.: Post-Presidential Papers, 1961-69
    EISENHOWER, DWIGHT D.: POST-PRESIDENTIAL PAPERS, 1961-69 1963 PRINCIPAL FILE SERIES DESCRIPTION The 1963 Principal File served as the main office file for Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Gettysburg office. It is divided into two subseries--a subject file and an alphabetical file. The subject subseries contains such categories as appointments, autographs, endorsements, gifts, invitations, memberships, messages, politics, publications, statements, and trips. This subseries is comprised of a little over thirty-one boxes, and it is arranged in alphabetical order by name of subject category. Invitations generated the greatest volume of correspondence, followed by appointments, gifts, and messages. The alphabetical subseries consists of nearly thirty-nine boxes of materials arranged in alphabetical order by names of individuals and organizations. Though primarily a correspondence file, it also contains other types of documents, including speeches, published materials, lists, statements, minutes of meetings, and transcripts of interviews. This series reveals that the volume of Eisenhower’s correspondence continued to grow. It placed an increasing burden on his staff, who answered most inquiries, and on friends such as Bryce Harlow, who often drafted letters for Eisenhower on politically sensitive subjects, and on Dwight Eisenhower himself, who continued to edit correspondence with friends and acquaintances. The increased strain on Eisenhower and his staff is revealed in the many letters which turned down requests for appointments, autographs, speeches, endorsements, and special messages from the former president. The bulk of this series consists of routine correspondence and related materials. However, there are numerous letters and memoranda which discuss national and international events, issues, and personalities. The space program, taxes, the New Frontier, People to People, the Test Ban Treaty, the assassination of President Kennedy, NATO, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The October 1963 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano Hawaii
    The October 1963 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano Hawaii GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 614-C The October 1963 Eruption of Kilauea Volcano Hawaii By JAMES G. MOORE and ROBERT Y. KOYANAGI SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 614-C UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract._______________________________________ Cl Introduction ____________________________________ 1 Distribution of volcanic activity on the east rift zone- 1 Events of 1963 preceding the eruption___--_-_-_--_. 5 Description of the eruption__---_-_-_-_------------ 5 Lava flows_-__---_--____________---_____---____- 7 Earthquakes, tremor, and tilting...-______-___--_-_ 10 Petrology of the lavas. _________________-------_-- 11 References cited _________________________________ 13 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 1. Geologic map of the central part of the east rift zone of Kilauea Volcano.______________--__-___-_---_--- In pocket FIGURE 1. Map showing the summit region of Kilauea Volcano_________________-__-__.-___._________-_---_--------- C2 2. Diagram showing the longitudinal distribution of eruptive vents on the east rift zone of Kilauea Volcano from 1954 to 1965___________________________________________-_____________--___----_-_-----_--------- :$ 3. Graph showing relations of Kilauean eruptions and collapses, ground tilting, and earthquakes._________---___- "> 4. Graph showing chronology of events during the October 1963 Kilauea east rift eruption.______-___.___._-___- 6 5. Oblique aerial photograph of eruptive vents extending east of Napau Crater_______-_-__---____-_-__-_-_--_- S 6.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Africa Cases Affaires D U Sud-Ouest
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES (ETHIOPIA v. SOUTH AFRICA; LIBERIA v. SOUTH AFRICA) ORDER OF 18 SEPTEMBER 1963 COUK INTEKNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRES DU SUD-OUEST AFRICAIN (ÉTHIOPIE c. AFRIQUE DU SUD; LIBÉRIA c. AFRIQUE DU SUD) ORDONNANCE DU 18 SEPTEMBRE 1963 This Order should be cited as follows: 'South West A frica Cases (Ethiopia v. South A f~ica; Liberia v. South Africa), Order of 18 September 1963: I.C. J. Reports 1963, p. 12." La présente ordonnance doit être citée comme suit: K Aljaires du Sud-Ouest africailz (Éthiopie c. Afrique du Sud; Libéria c. Afrique du Sud), Ordonnance du 18 septembre 1963: C. I. J. Recueil 1963, fi. 12. )) INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1963 18 September General List : YEAR 1963 Nos. 46 & 47 18 September 1963 SOUTH WEST AFRICA CASES (ETHIOPIA v. SOUTH AFRICA; LIBERIA v. SOUTH, AFRICA) ORDER Present :President WINIARSKI; Vice-President ALFARO; Judges BASDEVANT,BADAWI, MORENO QUINTANA, WELLINGTON Koo, SPIROPOULOS,Sir Percy SPENDER,Sir Gerald FITZ- MAURICE,KORETSKY, TANAKA, BUSTAMANTE Y RIVERO, JESSUP,MORELLI; Registrar GARNIER-COIGNET. The International Court of Justice, composed as above, after deliberation, having regard to Article 48 of the Statute of the Court and to Article 37 of the Rules of Court, Makes the following Order : Having regard to the Order of 5 February 1963, fixing 30 Sep- tember 1963 as the time-limit for the filing of the Counter-Memorial of the Government of
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Leader of 1960S Sets Valley Stop Page 1 of 2
    Civil rights leader of 1960s sets Valley stop Page 1 of 2 Civil rights leader of 1960s sets Valley stop By Peter H. Milliken Saturday, October 1, 2011 By Peter H. Milliken [email protected] YOUNGSTOWN A top national leader in the 1960s civil-rights movement will address city high-school students this month. U.S. Rep. John Lewis, D-5th, of Atlanta, will speak to an assembly of students at 10 a.m. Oct. 18 at East High School. The assembly will be for students from East, Chaney and the Youngstown Early College High schools, and it will not be open to the public. Lewis will discuss his experiences in the civil rights movement and his commitment to nonviolence. Later that day, the 71-year-old congressman will speak at a Cleveland Legal Aid Society banquet. Lewis is coming to Youngstown at the invitation of Mahoning Valley Sojourn to the Past, an organization that sponsors a 10-day annual trip for Youngstown city high school students to sites of key 1960s civil-rights marches in Southern states and to meet movement leaders, such as Lewis. Penny Wells, director of Sojourn, announced Lewis’ appearance at Thursday’s meeting of the Mahoning County commissioners. Lewis, who was recognized as one of the nation’s “Big Six” civil rights leaders, was chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee from 1963 to 1966. Lewis was a planner and the youngest speaker at the August 1963 Washington, D.C., rally, where the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his historic “I Have a Dream” speech.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 6964 UNION of SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, UNITED KINGDOM of GREAT BRITAIN and NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED STATES of AMERICA, AF
    No. 6964 UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AFGHANISTAN, AUSTRALIA, etc. Treaty banning nuclear weapon tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water. Signed at Moscow, on 5 August 1963 Official texts: English and Russian. Registered by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of .America on 15 October 1963. UNION DES RÉPUBLIQUES SOCIALISTES SOVIÉTIQUES, ROYAUME-UNIDE GRANDE-BRETAGNE ET DTRLANDE DU NORD, ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIQUE, AFGHANISTAN, AUSTRALIE, etc. Traité interdisant les essais d'armes nucléaires dans l'at mosphère, dans l'espace extra-atmosphérique et sous l'eau. Signé à Moscou, le 5 août 1963 Textes officiels anglais et russe. Enregistré par /© Union des Républiques socialistes soviétiques, le Royaume- Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord et les États-Unis d'Amérique le 15 octobre 1963. 1963 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 45 No. 6964. TREATY1 BANNING NUCLEAR WEAPON TESTS IN THE ATMOSPHERE, IN OUTER SPACE AND UNDER WATER. SIGNED AT MOSCOW, ON 5 AUGUST 1963 The Governments of the United States of America ,the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the " Original Parties ", Proclaiming as their principal aim the speediest possible achievement of an agreement on general and complete disarmament under strict international control in accordance with the objectives of the United Nations which would put an end to the armaments race and eliminate the incentive to the production and testing of all kinds of weapons, including nuclear weapons, Seeking to achieve the discontinuance of all test explosions of nuclear weapons for all time, determined to continue negotiations to this end, and desir ing to put an end to the contamination of man©s environment by radioactive substances, Have agreed as follows : Article I 1.
    [Show full text]
  • John Lewis, "Speech at the March on Washington" (28 August 1963)
    Voices of Democracy 5 (2010): 18‐36 Pauley 18 JOHN LEWIS, "SPEECH AT THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON" (28 AUGUST 1963) Garth E. Pauley Calvin College Abstract: John Lewis delivered a fiery speech at the March on Washington that attracted nearly as much attention as Martin Luther King, Jr.'s famous "I Have a Dream" oration. Although he had been forced to "tone down" his speech, Lewis still delivered a rousing message that effectively captured the militant spirit among many civil rights workers in the summer of 1963. Key Words: John Lewis; March on Washington; civil rights movement; Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. On August 28, 1963, more than 250,000 people participated in the largest and most remembered civil rights demonstration in the United States‐‐the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. The speeches delivered by representatives of the ten civil rights, religious, and labor organizations that sponsored the March were the focal point of the event, with Martin Luther King Jr.'s famous "I Have a Dream" oration becoming one of the most celebrated speeches in American history, pushing the others to the margins of our historical memory. While civil rights leader John Lewis's fiery address at the March did not approach King's in terms of eloquence, his speech is notable for its militancy, attracting nearly as much attention in its time. Even though Lewis was forced by other speakers at the March to "tone down" his rhetoric, he still delivered a powerful indictment of racial injustice and the politicians' failure to address the nation's chronic civil rights problems.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX D National Science Foundation-Sponsored Scientific Conferences, Symposia, and Advanced Science Seminars Held During Fiscal Year 1964
    APPENDIX D National Science Foundation-Sponsored Scientific Conferences, Symposia, and Advanced Science Seminars Held During Fiscal Year 1964 SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES AND SYMPOSIA IN THE BIOLOGICAL AND MEDICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH SEMINARS IN MOLECULAR BroLooY-University of California; Meetings scheduled as opportunity arises; Melvin Calvin, Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley. ANIMAL REPRODUCTION Sy~PosIu~-Corvallis, Oreg.; August 3, 1963; H. H. Cole, Professor of Animal Husbandry, University of California at Davis. THE XVI INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ZooLoGY-Washington, D.C.; August 20-27, 1963; Frank L. Campbell, Division of Biology and Agricul- ture, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. SYMPOSIUM ON FERREDOMNS AND OTHER NON-HEMP, IRON-CONTAINING ENzYMEs-University of Hawaii; August 22-23, 1963; Howard F. Mower- Theodore Winnick, Department of Biochemistry, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. SYMPOSIUM ON DEVELOPMENTS IN CLASSICAL CONDITIONIN~University Park, Pa.; August 1963; William F. Prokasy, Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind. ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENEncS~olumbia Univer- sity; September 2-10, 1963; Francis J. Ryan, Department of Zoology, Columbia University, New York, N.Y. FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN Ao.4RoLooY-Fort Collins, Colo.; September 3-7, 1963; Tyler A. Woolley, Department of Zoology, Colorado State University, Denver, Colo. SYMPOSIUM ON BACTERIAL ENDOTOXINS-Rutgers University; September 4-6, 1963; Werner Braun, Department of Bacteriology, Rutgers State Uni- versity, New Brunswick, N. J. CONFERENCE OF ELECTRON TRANsPoRT-New York, N.Y.; September 12, 1963; B&ton Chance, Director, Johnson Foundation, University of Penn- sylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.; Julius Schultz, Hahnemann Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa. 118 SYMPOSIUM ON PrsoTosvNTsrrssrs-Warrenton, Va.; October 14-18, 1963; Frank L.
    [Show full text]
  • August, 1963 Page Two E NGINE.ERS NEWS Local 3 Pfo/Iles Am Local 3 Will Be "Out in Front." Congratdated for Keeping Your ~~~ 111:1; San Lorenzo, Calif
    I OPERAT-ING -ENGI EERS 'lOCJU. 3 / ~637 Vol~ 22-No. .8 · "The-safety activities of Local Union No. 3 have ~ broug~~ the · Operating Engineers i~to prominence' throughout the United' St~tes,"· Gen. · Pres .. Hunter ·o. Wharton of the Inti. UniQri of ' operating Engineers,. declared-at a luncheon at the Del .Webb ·hotel' in S;m Frlm,dsco, ' Wednesday, J~ly 25. President Wharton ·was in · · San· · Fra~mcisco. for a mee't- ing. 6f the Cphstruction Sec- . TSI!il e..;..e ,p ~~Me . tion Executive Board of the : ~K ~~ . Iii 1 National Safety -Council. · B I!!!.' .fl. · ' - . ' His. presence in the ~. area · oe i1$l(Qhre. Oft enabled · him · fo -attend ·a · ' .. lupcheon: :With L?cal 3's of~ic~.rs · Labor ·Dav and representatives, . to• whwh \ · .'"' .. 'ifl ' Inti. were also invited IUOE . The fifth annual nationwide ~ WELCOME· GUEST: General P~esident Hunter P.~ Wharton of the Operati~g Engineers (center, Vice Pres. Newell . J . Carman; campaign to . reduce the toll .of - in grey suit) was; ,honored guest at a luncheon given by-:- Local 3 during his visit to San Franc· i~~o .George P. Sherman, chief, Cali­ accidents over the · Labor ·Day ·for ameeting o{ the Construc;;_tion .Section .. executive committee,· Nationai ·Safety Council. He fornia ·State D\vision o£ Indus- . trial -.Safet)l:, and Frank A. Law­ weekend has been launched by is shown here With the officers of. Local 3 aod other invited g\Jests. - . ,, -rence, presiding commissioner, the AF~·CXO Standing Commit· · Calif.' . State Industdal Accident tee on Safety & Occupational Comniissiop, Northern· Section. Health in ·coqperation with the .
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    KEg/ifilCIED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/19^7 13 December 1962 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES Status under Recommendations of 18 November i960, 9 December 196l and 14 November 1962 By the Recommendation of 18 November i960 (9S/l6) contracting parties are recommended to continue for a period of two years to apply the GATT, on a de facto basis and subject to reciprocity, in their relations with territories which acquire full autonomy in the conduct of their external commercial relations and of other matters provided for in the General Agreement but which require some time to consider their future commercial policy and the question of their relations with the GATT. Under the Recommendation of 9 December 1961 (lOS/17), this de facto application is to be extended for a further year in respect of States which request this longer period in which to decide upon their future relations with the GATT. For certain States in Africa, the period was again extended, by the Decision of 14 November 1962 (L/1934), until the close of the last ordinary session of the CONTRACTING PARTIES in 1963.I The following is the situation in respect of the States to which the Recommendations are at present applicable: Expiry date under Extended expiry date Recommendation of I960 under Recommendation (2 years after date of of 1961 or 1962 independence) Algeria 3 July 1964 Burundi 1 July 1964 •Cameroun 1 January 1962 15 November 1963 •Central African Republic 14 August 1962 15 November 1963 *Chad 11 August 1962 15 November 1963 •Congo (Brazzaville)
    [Show full text]