DOCSLIB.ORG

De Administrando Imperio (DAI) Sont À L’Étude Depuis Les 400 Dernières Années Environ1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
De Administrando Imperio (DAI) Sont À L’Étude Depuis Les 400 Dernières Années Environ1 Ti b o r Ži v k o v i ć So u r c e S d e co n st a n T i n vii Po r P h y r o g é n è T e co n c e r n a n T l e Pa ss é l e Pl u S an c i e n d e S Se r b e S e T d e S cr o a T e S Les chapitres 29 à 36 de l’ouvrage de l’empereur Constantin VII Porphyrogénète (945-959) De administrando imperio (DAI) sont à l’étude depuis les 400 dernières années environ1. Le passé le plus ancien des Serbes et des Croates, relaté dans ces chapitres2, est au cœur d’un débat 1. L’ouvrage a été publié pour la première fois en 1611, en ayant comme base le manuscrit du XVIème siècle (Codex Vaticanus Palatinus gr. 126), copié par Antoine Eparchos, érudit humaniste grec venant de l’île de Corfu. À cette occasion, l’éditeur I. Meursius a défini le titre de l’ouvrage, préservé en historiographie jusqu’à nos jours; Constantini Imperatoris Porphyrogeniti, De administrando imperio, ad Romanum f., éd. I. MEURS I US , Lugduni Batavorum 1611. Le plus ancien manuscrit du DAI, datant du XIème siècle (Codex Parisinus gr. 2009), n’a été publié qu’en 1711, par A. Banduri, habitant de Dubrovnik; Imperium Orientale sive Antiquitates Constantinopolitanae in quatuor partes distributae, éd. A. BA NDUR I , Parisiis 1711. I. Bekker a republié le DAI en 1840, en s’appuyant sur Meursius et Banduri; Constantinus Porphyrogenitus De thematibus et De administrando imperio, éd. i. be k k e r u S , I-II, Bonnae 1840 (désormais: be k k e r ). La meilleure édition critique de cette oeuvre est, Constantine Porphyrogenitus De administrando imperio, éd. r. J. h. Je n k i n S – Gy. Mo r a v c S i k (CFHB 1), Washington, D.C. 1967 (désormais: DAI I). Le texte a été commenté par F. dv o r n i k – R. J. H. Je n k i n S – B. le w i S – Gy. Mo r a v c S i k – D. ob o l e n S k y – S. RUNC ima N , Constantine Porphyrogenitus De administrando imperio, II: Commentary, London 1962 (désormais: DAI II). L’édition la plus récente est, Konstantin Bagrùnorodnóy Ob upravlenii imperiey, éd. g. g. li Tav r i n – A. P. no v o S e l c e v , Moskva 1989 (désormais: li Tav r i n – no v o S e l c e v , Ob upravlenii). 2. Deux chapitres sont, explicitement, consacrés aux Croates et aux Serbes, le 31 et le 32, alors que les chapitres 29 et 30 sont consacrés à la Dalmatie, et les chapitres 33, 34, 35 et 36 aux principautés des Slaves du Sud – ceux des Zachlumi, des Terbuniôtes, des Επιμέλεια έκδοσης Βα σ ι λ ι κ η Βλ υ σ ι δ ο υ , ΙΒΕ/ΕΙΕ BYZANTINA ΣΥΜΜΕΙΚΤΑ 20 (2010) 11-37 12 TIBoR ŽIVkoVIć scientifique assez animé, lequel, n’ayant pas abouti a une conclusion finale, se poursuit aujourd’hui encore3. L’historiographie a traité les informations Dioklètianes, et des Pagani ou Arentanes. Pourtant, le récit se rapporte principalement aux Croates, également dans le chapitre 30. 3. L’intérêt pour les informations de Constantin VII sur les Serbes et les Croates s’est déjà manifesté à la deuxième moitié du XVIIème siècle, à l’époque où I. Lučić, le savant de Trogir, a essayé de faire une première analyse critique; De regno Dalmatiae et Croatiae libri sex, éd. I. lu c i u S , Amstelodami 1666. Pourtant, ce n’est qu’au XIXème siècle que l’ouvrage de l’empereur est devenu l’objet de recherches plus amples de Engel, Šafarik, kopitar, Miklošić, Rački, Jagić, Grot et Florinski; cf. Fontes Byzantini historiam populorum Jugoslaviae spectantes, II, interp. et comment. b. Fe r J a n č i ć , éd. G. ost r o g o r S k y , Beograd 1959, 4-5. Le DAI a suscité beaucoup d’intérêt, encore au XXème, ce qui est démontré par une série de travaux scientifiques composés par d’éminents historiens, parmi lesquels il conviendra de citer les suivants: J. b. bu r y , The Τreatise De administrando imperio, BZ 15 (1906) 517-577 (désormais: bu r y , Treatise); g. Ma n o J l o v i ć , Jadransko pomorje 9. stoljeća u svjetlu istočno-rimske (bizantinske) povijesti, Rad Jugoslovenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 150 (1902) 1-102; Idem, Studije o spisu “De administrando imperio” cara konstantina VII Porfirogenita, Rad Jugoslovenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 186 (1911) 104-184 (désormais: Ma n o J l o v i ć , Studije); F. Ši Š i ć , Ime Hrvat i Srbin i teorije o doseljenju Hrvata i Srba, Godišnjica Nikole Čupića 35 (1923) 1-49; Lj. ha u ptm a n n , Dolazak Hrvata, Zbornik kralja Tomislava, Zagreb 1925, 86-127; IDE M , Seoba Hrvata i Srba, Jugoslovenski istorijski časopis 3 (1937) 30-61; a. da b i n ov i ć , Državnopravni odnos Hrvata prema istočnom carstvu, Rad Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 270 (1941) 49-148; g. ost r o g o r S k y , Porfirogenitova hronika srpskih vladara i njeni hronoloki podaci, Istorijski časopis 1-2 (1948) 24-29 (désormais: ost r o g o r S k y , Hronika); b. gr a F e n a u e r , Prilog kritici izvjštaja konstantina Porfirogenita o doseljavanju Hrvata, Historijski zbornik 5 (1952) 1-56 (désormais: gr a F e n a u e r , Prilog); J. Fe r l u g a , Vizantija i postanak najranijih južnoslovenskih država, ZRVI 11 (1968) 55-66; IDE M , Vizantijsko carstvo i južnoslovenske države od sredine X veka, ZRVI 13 (1971) 75-107; a. To y n b e e , Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World, London 1973; l. Ma r g e T i ć , konstantin Porfirogenit i vrijeme dolaska Hrvata, Zbornik Historijskog zavoda Jugoslovenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti 8 (1977) 5-88; IDE M , Još o pitanju vremena dolaska Hrvata, Zgodovinski časopis 42/2 (1988) 234-240; B. Fe r J a n č i ć , Struktura 30. glave spisa De administrando imperio, ZRVI 18 (1978) 61-80; IDE M , Dolazak Hrvata i Srba na Balkansko poluostrvo, ZRVI 35 (1996) 117-154 (désormais: Fe r J a n č i ć , Dolazak); IDE M , Vasilije I i obnova vizanitjske vlasti u IX veku, ZRVI 36 (1997) 9-30; v. ko Š ć a k , Pripadnost istočne obale Jadrana do splitskih sabora 925-928, Historijski zbornik 33-34 (1981) 291-355; Lj. Ma k S i M ov i ć , Struktura 32 glave spisa De administrando imperio, ZRVI 21 (1982) 25-32 (désormais: Ma k S i M ov i ć , Struktura); IDE M , Pokrštavanje Srba i Hrvata, ZRVI 35 (1996) 155-174; n. kl a i ć , o problemima stare domovine, dolaska i pokrštavanja dalmatinskih Hrvata, Zgodovinski časopis 29/4 (1984) 253-270; IDE M , Najnoviji radovi o 29, 30. i 31. poglavlju u djelu De administrando imperio cara konstantina VII. Porfirogenita, BYZANTINA SYMMEIkTA 20 (2010) 11-37 SouRCES DE Constantin VII PoRPHYRoGéNèTE 13 de Constantin VII concernant l’arrivée, la christianisation et les relations entre les Serbes et les Croates, d’un côté, et Byzance, de l’autre – en suivant le schéma établi: vrai-faux, inventé-véritable – d’après une méthodologie basée sur la comparaison des informations que l’empereur possédait, avec d’autres sources, très diversifiées du point de vue chronologique, parlant de certains personnages, de certains peuples et de toponymes qui ont trouvé leur place dans le DAI4. Deux champs d’examens majeurs ont été négligés: le premier, concernant les remarques générales de l’œuvre entière, c’est-à-dire des 53 chapitres du DAI5, et le deuxième, concernant l’origine des sources que l’auteur a utilisées. Les remarques générales du DAI permettraient aux chercheurs de comprendre Constantin Porphyrogénète en tant qu’écrivain et historien, Starohrvatska prosvjeta (1985) 31-60; li Tav r i n – no v o S e l c e v , Ob upravlenii; i. Še v č e n k o , Re- reading Constantine Porphyrogenitus, dans: Byzantine Diplomacy (J. Sh e P a r d – S. Fr a n k l i n éds.), Aldershot 1992, 167-195; J. M. ri v e r o S , Croatas y serbios en el “De administrando imperio” de Constantino VII Porfyrogénito, Byzantion Nea-Hellás 13/15 (1993/96) 55-80; J. v. a. Fi n e , Jr., The Early Medieval Balkans, Ann Arbor 1991, 49-59; IDE M , When Ethnicity Did Not Matter in the Balkans: A Study of Identity in Pre-nationalist Croatia, Dalmatia, and Slavonia in the Medieval and Early-modern Periods, Ann Arbor 2006, 29-33; M. lo n č a r , Porfirogenitova seoba Hrvata pred sudom novije literature, Diadora 14 (1992) 375-448; k. be l k e – P. So u st a l , Die Byzantiner und ihre Nachbarn. Die De administrando imperio genannte Lehrschrift des Kaisers Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos für seinen Sohn Romanos (Byzantinische Geschichtsschreiber 19), Wien 1995 (désormais: be l k e – So u st a l , Die Byzantiner); S. ći r kov i ć , “Naseljeni gradovi” konstantina Porfirogenita i najstarija teritorijalna organizacija, ZRVI 37 (1998) 9-32; é. Ma l a M u T , Les adresses aux princes des pays slaves du Sud dans le Livre des cérémonies, II, 48: interprétation, TM 13 (2000) 595-615; B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hungarian Historical Review
    Hungarian Historical Review 3, no. 3 (2014): 494–528 Antal Molnár A Forgotten Bridgehead between Rome, Venice, and the Ottoman Empire: Cattaro and the Balkan Missions in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries A key element in the history of the missions that departed from Rome as of the middle of the sixteenth century is the functioning of the mediating structures that ensured the maintenance of the relationship between Rome as the center of the Holy Roman Empire and the territories where the missionaries did their work. On the Dalmatian coast of the Adriatic Sea, Ragusa, which today is the city of Dubrovnik, was the most important bridgehead, but Cattaro, today Kotor, also played a significant role as a point of mediation between Rome and the Ottoman Empire. My intention in this essay is to present the many roles of Cattaro in the region, focusing in particular on its role in the maintenance of communication between Rome and missions to the Balkans. Cattaro never lost its Balkan orientation, even following the weakening of economic ties and the loss of its episcopal jurisdiction, which had extended over parishes in Serbia in the Middle Ages. Rather, in the sixteenth century it grew with the addition of a completely new element. From 1535 to 1786 Cattaro was the most important center of the postal service between Venice and Istanbul. As of 1578, the management of the Istanbul post became the responsibility of the Bolizza family. Thus the family came to establish a wide network of connections in the Balkans. I examine these connections and then offer an analysis of the plans concerning the settlement of the Jesuits in Cattaro.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir-Peter-Goss-The-Beginnings
    Vladimir Peter Goss THE BEGINNINGS OF CROATIAN ART Published by Ibis grafika d.o.o. IV. Ravnice 25 Zagreb, Croatia Editor Krešimir Krnic This electronic edition is published in October 2020. This is PDF rendering of epub edition of the same book. ISBN 978-953-7997-97-7 VLADIMIR PETER GOSS THE BEGINNINGS OF CROATIAN ART Zagreb 2020 Contents Author’s Preface ........................................................................................V What is “Croatia”? Space, spirit, nature, culture ....................................1 Rome in Illyricum – the first historical “Pre-Croatian” landscape ...11 Creativity in Croatian Space ..................................................................35 Branimir’s Croatia ...................................................................................75 Zvonimir’s Croatia .................................................................................137 Interlude of the 12th c. and the Croatia of Herceg Koloman ............165 Et in Arcadia Ego ...................................................................................231 The catastrophe of Turkish conquest ..................................................263 Croatia Rediviva ....................................................................................269 Forest City ..............................................................................................277 Literature ................................................................................................303 List of Illustrations ................................................................................324
    [Show full text]
  • 00 TZ Konstantin Nulte:Layout 1.Qxd
    Tibor Živković DE CONVERSIONE CROATORUM ET SERBORUM A Lost Source INSTITUTE OF HISTORY Monographs Volume 62 TIBOR ŽIVKOVIĆ DE CONVERSIONE CROATORUM ET SERBORUM A Lost Source Editor-in-chief Srđan Rudić, Ph.D. Director of the Institute of History Belgrade 2012 Consulting editors: Academician Jovanka Kalić Prof. Dr. Vlada Stanković This book has been published with the financial support of THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (project No III47025) CONTENTS PREFACE 9 ABBREVIATIONS 13 INTRODUCTORY NOTE The Workshop of Constantine Porphyrogenitus 19 THE STORY OF THE CROATS 43 THE STORY OF DALMATIA 91 THE STORY OF THE SERBS 149 THE DISPLACED SECTIONS OF CONSTANTINE’S PRIMARY SOURCE ON THE CROATS AND THE SERBS 181 CONCLUSIONS 197 SOURCES 225 REFERENCES 229 INDEXES 241 Nec plus ultra To the memories of the finest gentleman Božidar Ferjančić (1929 – 1998) PREFACE This book is the result of 20 years of research on the so-called Slavic chapters of Constantine Pophyrogenitus’ De administrando imperio, the last stage of which took place in Athens 2009/2010, where I was completing my postdoctoral research on the supposed main source Constantine Porhyrogenitus had used for the earliest history of the Croats and the Serbs. The research took place at the Centre for Byzantine Research in Athens (IVE) with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Serbian Government and the Serbian Orthodox Metropoly of Montenegro. The first preliminary results on the supposed, now lost source of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, were published in an article in Byzantina Symmeikta (2010) and the results I presented at that time allowed me to try to make a more profound analysis of that source and eventually to reveal the most significant number of its fragments preserved in the Croat and Serb chapters of De administrando imperio – its original purpose – as well as the possible background of its composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Relations with Northern Peoples in the Tenth Century
    CONSTANTINE PORPHYROGENITUS, DE ADMINISTRANDO IMPERIO Byzantine Relations with Northern Peoples in the Tenth Century INTRODUCTION Byzantine relations with Bulgaria were complicated in the early years of the tenth century: more complicated than many historians have allowed. The Bulgarian Tsar Symeon (c. 894-927) has been portrayed by both Byzantine and modern authors as an aggressor intent on capturing Constantinople from which he might rule a united Byzantine-Bulgarian empire. However, recent scholarship (notably the work of Bozhilov and Shepard) has questioned this, and maintained that Symeon's ambitions were more limited until the final years of his reign, the 920s, when he engineered a series of confrontations with the Byzantine Emperor Romanos I Lekapenos (920- 44). (We will cover these years elsewhere: see the letters of Nicholas Mystikos and Theodore Daphnopates.) Symeon's died on 27 May 927, and his successor Peter (d. 967) immediately launched a major invasion of the Byzantine administrative district of Macedonia. As one of four sons such a show of strength would have been necessary to secure the support of his father's boyars. However, the Bulgarian troops withdrew swiftly, at the same time razing the fortresses that they had held until then in Thrace, and this early performance was not repeated. Instead, it heralded forty years of apparent harmony and cooperation between the two major powers in the northern Balkans. The reason for the withdrawal, and the centrepiece of the enduring Bulgarian Byzantine accord was the marriage in 927 of Peter to Maria Lecapena, granddaughter of the (senior) ruling emperor Romanus I Lecapenus.Peter has generally been held to have presided over the dramatic decline of Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and the Transformation of the Early Hungarian State
    The origins and the transformation of the early Hungarian state György Szabados ** What does the state mean? Why did the state come into existence? Philosophers and scholars have given us many answers from classical antiquity up to the present. Plato asserts that the origin of the state is to be found in that fact that the people cannot provide for their own needs and each of them lacks many things. 1 According to Aristotle, “The state is the highest form of community and aims at the highest good.” 2 The influence of these philosophers is evident in Cicero’s political thought. In his De re publica , the state means the common weal ( Est igitur, inquit Africanus, res publica res populi ). 3 Demonstrating the degrees and the changes of political systems, Cicero used the word status in a close context with the terms res publica and civitas , which now meant “state” (habet statum res publica de tribus secundarium ... praestare nostrae civitatis statum ceteris civitatibus ). 4 Therefore, Roman antiquity was the starting point of the abstraction of the word status from its original meaning to ** György Szabados is director of MKI Gyula László Research Centre and Archive, Budapest and consulting historian of King Saint Stephen Museum and Gyula Siklósi Research Centre for Urban History, Székesfehérvár, Hungary. 1 Platon, Politeia – Der Staat . Ders , Werke in acht Bänden , ed. by Gunther Eiger – Dietrich Kurz – Émile Chambry, Deutsche Übersetzung von Friedrich Schleichermacher, vol. 4, Darmstadt, 1971, pp. 126-127 (369c). 2 Aristotle’s Politics , trans. by Benjamin Jowett, Oxford 1920, p. 7 (1, 2). 3 Cicero, De re publica .
    [Show full text]
  • Contacts Between Duklja/Zeta and the Apennine Peninsula in the Middle Ages As a Topic in Montenegrin Periodicals in 1835–1941
    Vasilj Jovović* https://doi.org/10.2298/BALC1748229J UDC 050(497.16)"1835/1941" Faculty of Philosophy 930.85(497.16:450)"1835/1941" University of Montenegro 008(497.16:450)"1835/1941" Nikšić Original scholarly work http://www.balcanica.rs Contacts between Duklja/Zeta and the Apennine Peninsula in the Middle Ages as a Topic in Montenegrin Periodicals in 1835–1941 Abstract: This paper shows that continuity of connections between Duklja/Zeta and the Apennine Peninsula during the middle ages, which were manifested both in the political and in the cultural sphere, attracted attention as a topic in the periodical press issued in the territory of present-day Montenegro from 1835 to 1941. The paper offers a systematized overview of such, for the most part descriptive, texts on political and cultural links between what now are Montenegro and Italy in the middle ages. Keywords: Montenegrin periodicals, middle ages, cultural contacts, Duklja, Zeta, Apennine Peninsula he periodicals published in the territory of present-day Montenegro from T1835 – when the first periodical was started, the almanacGrlica ( Turtle - dove), until 1941– when the Second World War began, allotted some space to political and cultural links between Duklja/Zeta1 and the Apennine Peninsula during the middle ages. Contributors to the Montenegrin periodical press in the observed period found inspiration for their texts in the common political framework of lands that now constitute Montenegro and Italy (within the Byz- antine Empire, under the Republic of Venice), the spreading of Christianity and literacy (Beneventan script), the cult of saints (St Michael and St Nicholas), the practice of founding and endowing churches (St Nicholas in Bari) or marriage ties between ruling families (Vojislavljević, Crnojević).
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantina Symmeikta
    Byzantina Symmeikta Vol. 20, 2010 Sources de Constantin VII Porphyrogénète concernant le passé le plus ancien des Serbes et des Croates ŽIVKOVIĆ Tibor dr https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.963 Copyright © 2014 Tibor ŽIVKOVIĆ To cite this article: ŽIVKOVIĆ, T. (2010). Sources de Constantin VII Porphyrogénète concernant le passé le plus ancien des Serbes et des Croates. Byzantina Symmeikta, 20, 11-37. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.963 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 30/09/2021 12:17:04 | Ti b o r Ži v k o v i ć So u r c e S d e co n st a n T i n vii Po r P h y r o g é n è T e co n c e r n a n T l e Pa ss é l e Pl u S an c i e n d e S Se r b e S e T d e S cr o a T e S Les chapitres 29 à 36 de l’ouvrage de l’empereur Constantin VII Porphyrogénète (945-959) De administrando imperio (DAI) sont à l’étude depuis les 400 dernières années environ1. Le passé le plus ancien des Serbes et des Croates, relaté dans ces chapitres2, est au cœur d’un débat 1. L’ouvrage a été publié pour la première fois en 1611, en ayant comme base le manuscrit du XVIème siècle (Codex Vaticanus Palatinus gr. 126), copié par Antoine Eparchos, érudit humaniste grec venant de l’île de Corfu. À cette occasion, l’éditeur I.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory and Authority in the Ninth-Century Dalmatian Duchy
    Marino Kumir MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Reader CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 MEMORY AND AUTHORITY IN THE NINTH-CENTURY DALMATIAN DUCHY by Marino Kumir (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2016 I, the undersigned, Marino Kumir, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of the work of others, and no part of the thesis infringes on any person’s or institution’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Zgodovinski Časopis ISSN 0350-5774 HISTORICAL REVIEW ZČ | Ljubljana | 74 | 2020 | Št
    Zgodovinski časopis ISSN 0350-5774 HISTORICAL REVIEW ZČ | Ljubljana | 74 | 2020 | št. 3-4 (162) | str. 289–560 9 7 7 0 3 5 0 5 7 7 0 0 2 asopis | letnik 74 leto 2020 številka 3-4 (162) č ZČ | Ljubljana | 74 | 2020 | št. 3-4 (162) | str. 289–560 Zgodovinski Josip Banić, The Mystery of Merania: A New Solution to Old Problems (Holy Roman Empire and the Kingdom of Croatia- Dalmatia during the Investiture Controversy) (Part 1) • Ana Jenko Kovačič, Iurium Episcopalium Liber I. poreške škofije: Predstavitev, tipološka opredelitev in analiza kodeksa • Robert Devetak, Boj za slovenske šole in delovanje ženskih 3-4 podružnic Družbe svetega Cirila in Metoda na Goriškem in Gradiškem v obdobju pred prvo svetovno vojno • Damir Globočnik, Trubarjev spomenik v Ljubljani • Srđan Mladenov Jovanović, The Warmongering ’First Serbian Daily’: The Daily ’Politika’ during the First Balkan War of 1912-13 • Meta Remec, Napredek, avtarkija, narod: italijanska energetska politika v Posočju (1918–1943) • Klemen Kocjančič, Enote in ustanove Waffen-SS v Ljubljani med letoma 1943 in 1945 Zgodovinski časopis HISTORICAL REVIEW ZČ | Ljubljana | 74 | 2020 | št. 3-4 (162) | str. 289–560 Izdaja ZVEZA ZGODOVINSKIH DRUŠTEV SLOVENIJE Ljubljana GLASILO ZVEZE ZGODOVINSKIH DRUŠTEV SLOVENIJE Mednarodni uredniški odbor: dr. Kornelija Ajlec (SI), dr. Tina Bahovec (SI), dr. Bojan Balkovec (SI) (tehnični urednik), dr. Rajko Bratož (SI), dr. Ernst Bruckmüller (AT), dr. Liliana Ferrari (IT), dr. Ivo Goldstein (HR), dr. Žarko Lazarević (SI), dr. Dušan Mlacović (SI) (namestnik odgovornega urednika), dr. Božo Repe (SI), dr. Franc Rozman (SI), Janez Stergar (SI), dr. Imre Szilágyi (H), dr. Peter Štih (SI) (odgovorni urednik), dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stari Bar 5.Indb
    SERIE DELL’INSEGNAMENTO DI ARCHEOLOGIA MEDIEVALE DIPARTIMENTO DI STUDI UMANISTICI – UNIVERSITÀ CA’ FOSCARI DI VENEZIA Direzione: Sauro Gelichi Comitato scientifico: Richard Hodges (The American University of Rome), Mitja Guštin (Università di Koper), Sonia Gutiérrez Lloret (Universidad de Alicante), Joachim Henning (Goethe Universität Frankfurt), Marco Milanese (Università di Sassari), Lauro Olmo Enciso (Universidad de Alcala), Marcello Rotili (Università di Napoli Federico II) THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT IN STARI BAR Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Italy) – Department of Human Studies Municipality of Bar (Montenegro) University of Primorska, Koper (Slovenia) – Institute of Mediterranean Heritage (2004-2009) Financing Institutions Ministero degli Affari Esteri – Direzione Generale per la Promozione e la Cooperazione Culturale – Ufficio V – Settore Archeologia (2008-2013) Municipality of Bar (Montenegro) – Opština Bar – Republika Crna Gora (2008-2013) Regione Veneto attraverso la L.R. n. 1/2008, art. 25 “Iniziative a favore del patrimonio storico, culturale, architettonico e artistico di origine veneta nell’area mediterranea” Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Italy) – Department of Human Studies (2008-2013) Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Foundation, Venice (Italy) (2013) Ditta Zamperla (2013) Promoting Institutions Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Italy) – Department of Human Studies In collaboration with: Centre of Culture of Bar – Museum of Bar STORIE DI UNA CITTÀ Stari Bar tra antichità ed epoca moderna attraverso le ricerche archeologiche
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium
    Reinventing Roman Ethnicity in High and Late Medieval Byzantium Yannis Stouraitis* This paper seeks to position the Byzantine paradigm within the broader discussion of identity, ethnicity and nationhood before Modernity. In about the last decade, there has been a revived interest in research into collective identity in Byzantine society, with a number of new publica- tions providing various arguments about the ethno-cultural or national character of Byzantine Romanness as well as its relationship to Hellenic identity. Contrary to an evident tendency in research thus far to relate Byzantine, i.e. medieval Roman, identity to a dominant essence – be it ethnic Hellenism, Chalcedonian orthodoxy or Roman republicanism – the approach adopt- ed here aims to divert attention to the various contents and the changing forms of Byzantine Romanness as well as to its function as a dominant mode of collective identification in the medieval Empire of Constantinople. The main thesis of the paper is that the development of Roman identity in the East after the turning point of the seventh century and up to the final sack of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453 needs to be examined as one of the most fas- cinating cases of transformation of a pre-modern social order’s collective identity discourse, one which culminated in an extensive reconstruction of the narrative of the community’s his- torical origins by the educated élite. Last but not least, the problematization of the function of Romanness as an ethnicity in the Byzantine case offers an interesting example for comparison in regards to the debated role of ethnicity as a factor of political loyalty in the pre-modern era.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project Focuses on the Transformations of the Roman Province of Dalmatia Between 400 and 1000
    The project focuses on the transformations of the Roman province of Dalmatia between 400 and 1000. This was a period of radical change for the different areas of this region. The considered time-frame offers the possibility to study the waning of the Roman rule, the first attestation of the Slav identity in Dalmatia, the struggle of Franks and Byzantium in the region and the crystallization of a new society in the 10th c. when powerful elites, like the Croatians and later the Venetians, shared control of the territory. While the major Adriatic towns showed strong links with the Eastern Mediterranean and Byzantium, other coastal and inland territories witnessed the formation of new political entities named after ethnic groups like Croatia, Narentania or Serbia. These are the years when the name Dalmatia began to signify only the Adriatic shores and islands, as in the case of today: a semantic-turn reflecting broader changes that will be investigated in this proposal. These changes have been traditionally explained with the pattern of migration, destruction and resistance. The proposed research will challenge this view. In order do this five main lines of research are planned: (1) The Territorial transformations of the province and their background. (2) Urban discontinuity and destruction myths (How the decline of roman cities and the rise of the medieval ones were explained by medieval chronicles ). (3) De-Romanization and the rise of new elites. (4) Constantine Porphyrogenitus and the construction of the Dalmatian ethnography (an analysis of the chapters 28/9-36 of the De administrando imperio). (5) Christianization.
    [Show full text]