Immigration Detention in California
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The California Department of Justice’s Review of Immigration Detention in California February 2019 Xavier Becerra California Attorney General The California Department of Justice’s Review of Immigration Detention in California February 2019 Xavier Becerra California Attorney General Background and Overview California is one of the frst states to examine the daily operations of detention facilities housing civil immigration detainees. After public reports of distressing conditions and several deaths in detention facilities surfaced with little to no transparency, the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 103 (AB 103) in June 2017. Under AB 103’s 10-year mandate, the California Department of Justice is charged with reviewing and reporting back to the Legislature, the Governor, and the public about the conditions of confnement, including how those conditions impact due process, and the circumstances around apprehension and transfer of detainees in public and privately operated locked detention facilities housing immigration detainees in California. In preparation of this report, the California Department of Justice (Cal DOJ) consulted with dozens of experts, visited all ten public and private detention facilities in California, and engaged in comprehensive reviews of three of the ten facilities, including the juvenile detention facility housing children in immigration proceedings. This review allows California to understand issues related to health, welfare, and other conditions in immigration facilities in the state—including local publicly operated facilities. The report is intended to provide transparency to the public regarding those conditions. It includes a written summary of fndings that detail the diffculties immigration detainees face while in detention such as signifcant restrictions on liberty, language barriers, limited access to medical and mental health care, minimal contact with family and friends, and numerous barriers to securing legal representation or the evidence and other support they need. This initial report is the frst important step towards ensuring that civil immigration detainees are afforded critical health, safety, and due process protections through their conditions of confnement in California. Immigration Detention Facility Report Team Xavier Becerra Attorney General Daniel Torres Special Assistant to the Attorney General Angela Sierra Chief Assistant Attorney General Michael Newman Senior Assistant Attorney General Susan Slager Supervising Deputy Attorney General Randie C. Chance, Ph.D. Director, Department of Justice Research Center Elizabeth Duenas Special Agent, Division of Law Enforcement Domonique C. Alcaraz Deputy Attorney General Marisol Len Deputy Attorney General Julia Harumi Mass Deputy Attorney General Vilma Palma-Solana Deputy Attorney General Jasleen Singh Deputy Attorney General Katyria Serrano Associate Governmental Program Analyst Tiffany Jantz, Ph.D. Research Associate, Department of Justice Research Center Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................i Glossary of Terms................................................................v I. Introduction.................................................................1 II. Background .................................................................3 1. Immigration and Nationality Act Provisions Authorizing Civil Detention..................3 2. Applicable Detention Standards ...............................................5 III. Methodology ...............................................................10 1. Review of Publicly Available Information and Input from Stakeholders .................10 2. Consultation with Experts...................................................11 3. Preliminary Site Visits ......................................................11 4. Comprehensive Reviews ....................................................12 IV. Demographics of the Immigration Detainee Population in California .....................13 V. Overview and Brief Description of Seven out of the Ten Facilities Housing Immigration Detainees in California ..............................................20 1. Adelanto ICE Processing Center ..............................................21 2. Imperial Regional Detention Facility............................................23 3. James A. Musick Facility ....................................................26 4. Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility ............................................28 5. Otay Mesa Detention Center ................................................30 6. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center ............................................33 7. Yuba County Jail..........................................................34 VI. Comprehensive Facility Review: Yolo County Juvenile Detention Facility...................37 1. Background .............................................................37 2. Methodology ............................................................39 3. Summary of Key Findings . .39 4. Apprehension and Transfer of Detainees to Yolo ..................................40 5. Conditions of Confnement at Yolo ........................................... 43 6. Due Process . 64 7. Conclusion.............................................................. 66 VII. Comprehensive Facility Review: Theo Lacy Facility .................................. 67 1. Background . 67 2. Methodology ............................................................ 68 3. Summary of Key Findings ................................................... 69 4. Apprehension and Transfer of Detainees to Theo Lacy ............................. 71 5. Conditions of Confnement at Theo Lacy ....................................... 73 6. Due Process . 94 7. Conclusion.............................................................. 98 VIII.Comprehensive Facility Review: West County Detention Facility........................ 99 1. Background . 99 2. Methodology ........................................................... 100 3. Summary of Key Findings .................................................. 101 4. Apprehension and Transfer of Detainees to West County .......................... 103 5. Conditions of Confnement at West County.................................... 103 6. Due Process . 117 7. Effect of West County’s Termination of the ICE Contract .......................... 119 8. Conclusion............................................................. 120 IX. Summary of Key Findings.................................................... 121 1. Individuals in Immigration Detention: From Asylum Seekers to Long Time Permanent Residents............................................. 121 2. Conditions of Confnement Fail to Address the Unique Characteristics of Immigration Detention Population ......................................... 122 3. Due Process: The Challenges of Accessing Legal Services, Counsel, and Other Support for Immigration Cases While Detained ............................ 125 X. Conclusion and Next Steps................................................... 129 Acknowledgments............................................................ 130 List of Figures................................................................ 132 List of Tables ................................................................ 133 Executive Summary More immigrants are being held in detention facilities than ever before in American history. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reported that a total of 323,591 individuals were booked into ICE custody to begin a new detention stay, with an average daily population of 38,106 amongst all its detention facilities.1 In FY 2018, the number increased by 22.5 percent for a total of 396,448 individuals booked into ICE custody.2 During the last three years, locked public and private detention facilities in California housed more than 74,000 immigration detainees, including youth, from over 150 countries. Although children, women, and men all comprise the immigration detainee population, the most typical profle for detainees housed in California is that of a 25- to 34-year-old male from either Mexico, India, Guatemala, Honduras, or El Salvador, who spends an average of 51 days at any given facility. While this is the most common profle in California, through our review, we also encountered immigrants as young as 13 and as old as 95, from Armenia, China, France, Germany, Ghana, Haiti, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Nigeria, Russia, Spain, South Africa, Syria, Thailand, and the United Kingdom, with lengths of stay at a single facility as long as 1,500 days (over 4 years). Immigration detainees in California come into ICE custody in three main ways. They may have been: (1) apprehended by or presented themselves to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) at the border, (2) arrested by ICE in the interior of the country after being in the United States with or without permission for some amount of time, or (3) taken into custody by ICE at the time of their release from local, state, or federal criminal custody. Some of these individuals are detained because they are found to pose a risk of fight or danger to the community. Others are detained because they cannot afford to pay the bond amount ordered, or because they are statutorily ineligible for bond as arriving aliens— including those seeking asylum—or due to certain past criminal convictions. The end result is the confnement of many immigrants in highly restrictive settings