DOCSLIB.ORG

Albertmohler.Com – an Unbelievable Challenge — a Look at Atheist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Albertmohler.Com – an Unbelievable Challenge — a Look at Atheist http://www.albertmohler.com/2008/10/21/an-unbelievable-challenge-a-look-at-atheist-public-relations/ 1/3 AlbertMohler.com An Unbelievable Challenge — A Look at Atheist Public Relations Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Given how crazy this sounds, I would not have believed the report except for the fact that it was published by one of the world’s most venerable newspapers, The Times [London]. It seems that Richard Dawkins, perhaps the world’s most famous living atheist, is launching a campaign to put advertisements for atheism on London city buses. Take a look at the story: “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.” That is the cheery message London buses will be carrying if Richard Dawkins, the atheist, can raise enough cash. The slogan is to be daubed across 30 Westminster buses in retaliation for a series of bendy-bus Christian messages. CBS Outdoor, the bus advertising company, said that it would run the atheist ads in January. “Religion is accustomed to getting a free ride,” said Dawkins, who will match donations up to £5,500. Ariane Sherine, creator of the Atheist Bus Campaign, said: “I’m very pleased so many people are behind the atheist bus. Though not actually behind the atheist bus - they’d get covered in exhaust fumes.” Dawkins, a professor at Oxford University, is among the world’s most famous scientists. His professorial assignment is identified as “the public understanding of science,” but most of the world knows him as the proponent of the “selfish gene” as the basic engine of evolution. In more recent years, he has emerged as a strident and outspoken atheist. In his best-selling book, The God Delusion, Dawkins presented a broadside attack on theism in general and the Christian faith in particular. He has become the world’s most vocal opponent of belief in God and a significant presence in the media. Now, however, he seems to risk becoming a parody of himself. Look carefully at the strange wording of the proposed bus advertisements: “There’s probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.” That hardly seems like a ringing call to an emboldened atheism. “There’s probably no God?” Dawkins doesn’t exude much confidence with this wording. Probably? Regardless of the wording, I cannot imagine that these signs would prompt a wholesale resurgence of atheism. But the wording is interesting, to say the least. Maybe this represents a new “seeker sensitive” approach on the part of the atheists. Meanwhile, on this side of the Atlantic, Ronald Aronson of Wayne State University argues that politicians had better pay heed to atheists and allied unbelievers. Writing in USA Today, Aronson argues: Surveys regularly receive front-page coverage for reporting, as the 2008 Pew U.S. Religious Landscape Survey did, Accessed on 2010-10-04 http://www.albertmohler.com/2008/10/21/an-unbelievable-challenge-a-look-at-atheist-public-relations/ 2/3 that nearly all Americans believe in God. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life concluded that 92% of Americans are believers and that only 5% of Americans don’t believe in God (3% gave some other answer, didn’t know, or refused to answer). But something is wrong with this picture. It erases vast numbers of Americans —not only atheists, agnostics and secularists, but also those who have turned away from the God and religion of the Old and New Testaments. And it makes it seem as though most of those who claim to be “believers” believe pretty much the same things — though this is manifestly false. It encourages the sense that there are two kinds of Americans, the overwhelming majority who believe and belong, and those few do not believe, and are outsiders. But the conventional wisdom that nearly all Americans believe in God is wrong. Aronson wants the media and the political parties to pay more attention to unbelievers. In order to make his case, he goes after the numbers often cited to reveal how many Americans do and do not believe in God. “The politics and prejudices that marginalize secularists are unintentionally abetted by surveys,” he argues. Aronson suggests that the surveys are too vague, including any believer in any notion of God in their calculations. In addition, he asserts that the surveys are skewed by the factor of “social desirability.” It is not socially popular to be an atheist or an unbeliever, so the numbers are under-reported. I wonder if Arsonson really thinks this is a strong argument. If unbelievers were so numerous, the social sanction should disappear. Furthermore, when Aronson attempts to recast the numbers, he adds together atheists, agnostics, those with no affiliation (”nones”), and those who either didn’t want to answer or were unsure how to answer. Added together, he claims that these represent something like 25% of the population. Well, even if we accept his recast numbers here (and this is no way to count), the numbers still add up against his argument. If believers outnumber unbelievers by three to one, unbelievers are still vastly outnumbered. Aronson’s real concern appears at the end of his article: In an America where other minorities have mobilized themselves to demand their rights, when will our largest, most invisible minority “out” itself in daily life? When will they demand that the spirit of multiculturalism be extended to those who do not pray, instead of the widespread assumption that religious values, norms and practices apply to everyone? When will they realize that secularists, along with spiritualists and non-traditional believers, make up a good chunk of Democratic votes — and demand that secularists be included among the caucuses at Democratic Party conventions? And, because contrary to their carefully fashioned image, not all Republicans are believers, that secularists become visible in the GOP as well? When will secularists demand recognition for their enormous contributions to American history, culture, science, education and public life? When will this sleeping giant begin to rouse itself and make itself heard? Professor Aronson wants secularists to have recognition and a caucus within the major political parties. He seems absolutely certain that secularists represent a “sleeping giant” that will and must make itself known. Who knows? Maybe he sees the future. There is something deeper here that we should notice. The numbers game is slippery. Christian leaders are often only too happy to cite these figures without recognizing that belief in God, as represented in these surveys, does not necessarily mean Christian belief. If the vast majority of Americans were Christians who believed in the God of the Bible, we would face a very different nation than the one we know today. Similarly, atheists, agnostics, secularists, and assorted unbelievers can over-estimate their numbers as well. The “social desirability” issue is certainly at play here, but so are the hard facts of arithmetic. Even in our increasingly secularized age, strident unbelief is a hard sell to most Americans. Atheists have a real public relations challenge — and for good reason. Something tells me that arguing that, “There’s probably no God,” on London buses is not going to resolve that challenge. Do they really think it will drive Londoners into atheism? Probably not. Accessed on 2010-10-04 http://www.albertmohler.com/2008/10/21/an-unbelievable-challenge-a-look-at-atheist-public-relations/ 3/3 UPDATE: The Guardian [London] has both an article and a photo of the new signs. [see here] Content Copyright © 2002-2010, R. Albert Mohler, Jr. Accessed on 2010-10-04.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atheism by Mariano
    Atheism by Mariano Published: 11 June 2009(GMT+10) For many other articles on this topic, see Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions—Questions and Answers 1. Definition of “Atheism” There is confusion and debate about the term “atheism” and its definition. Table of contents 1. Definition of “Atheism” The term “atheism” finds its etymology in the Greek combination of “a” and “theos”. What “atheos” 1.1 Variations of Atheism means is, as with any term, subject to context (and perhaps personal interpretation). Note that if 2. Atheism as nature worship or an atheist states, “I do not believe in God”, this is technically not a statement about God’s neo-paganism existence or lack thereof. Does atheos mean “no God”, “without God”, “lack God belief” or “God 2.1 Atheist religion does not exist”? 3. Why Atheism is chosen 3.1 Natural born Atheist Early Christians were referred to as “atheists” because they did not believe in the Greek or Roman 4. Atheism and ethics/morality gods. Yet, while they positively affirmed the non-existence of those gods they likely believed that 4.1 Atheism and the “problem of evil” those gods were deceptive demons whom they did believe existed (1 Corinthians 8:4–6). 4.2 Atheism and the “Euthyphro Dilemma” Let us consider other Greek-derived “a” words: 4.3 Atheism’s “problem of evil” 4.4 Atheism’s Euthyphro Dilemma “Amusement”—no, without, or lack of musing, but does this mean 4.5 Theism’s reward and that musing does not exist, that the person is merely not musing punishment versus Atheism’s pure at the moment, that there is merely no musing upon a particular motives topic, etc.? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Public Reasons Works of John Finnis Available from Oxford University Press
    Religion and Public Reasons Works of John Finnis available from Oxford University Press Reason in Action Collected Essays: Volume I Intention and Identity Collected Essays: Volume II Human Rights and Common Good Collected Essays: Volume III Philosophy of Law Collected Essays: Volume IV Religion and Public Reasons Collected Essays: Volume V Natural Law and Natural Rights Second Edition Aquinas Moral, Political, and Legal Theory Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism with Joseph Boyle and Germain Grisez RELIGION AND PUBLIC REASONS Collected Essays: Volume V John Finnis 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © J. M. Finnis, 2011 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Crown Copyright material reproduced with the permission of the Controller, HMSO (under the terms of the Click Use licence) Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanist Handbook
    Humanist Handbook Brian McClinton First published 1996, Revised 2016 HUMANIST HANDBOOK (1998; revised 2016) Brian McClinton Contents 1. The First Humanists 2. The Development of Humanism Stage 1: Ancient Greece and Rome Stage 2: The Renaissance Stage 3: The 18th Century Enlightenment Stage 4: 19th Century to Present 3. John Toland, Father of Irish Secular Philosophy 4. The Humanism of Francis Hutcheson 5. Humanism in Ireland 6. The Existence of a God 7. The 12 Myths of Christmas 8. 10 Facts You Should know about the Bible 9. Who was Jesus? 10. Science and Religion 11. Ulster’s Killing Faiths 12. Religion in Schools 13. A Humanist Ethical Code 14. Abortion and Women’s Rights 15. Gay and Lesbian Rights 16. A Guide to Humanist Literature 17. Guide to Humanist Related Films 18. Famous Humanists 1. The First Humanists Humanism is a view of life and a way of life. It is for those people who base their interpretation of existence on the evidence of the natural world and its evolution, and not on belief in a supernatural power. As such, Humanism is older and more universal than Christianity. But when and where did it begin? Of course, there have always been those who doubted the existence of Gods. But we can only look to the written evidence, and it is Protagoras, a teacher and philosopher of the 5th century BC, who is usually regarded as 'the first Humanist'. He formulated the dictum that man is the measure of all things, by which he probably meant that there is no objective standard or ultimate truth outside human values derived from human experience.
    [Show full text]
  • “I HATE YOU ALL” Divided Britain
    ISSUE 71 / SUMMER 2019 ISSN 25167162 ONLINE “I HATE YOU ALL” Divided Britain THE MAGAZINE FOR MEMBERS OF THE UK COUNCIL FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY New Interview / Susie Orbach The magazine of the UK Council for Psychotherapy Welcome Editorial address: UK Council for Psychotherapy, America House, ISSUE 71 / SUMMER 2019 2 America Square, London EC3N 2LU Published by: James Pembroke Media, 90 Walcot Street, Bath BA1 5BG Editor: Anna Scott, [email protected] Issue 71 consulting editors: Sarah Niblock, Matt Nicholls, Martin Pollecoff, Sandra Scott Head of design: Simon Goddard sychotherapy is a highly Senior project manager: ‘P informed discourse about what it is Marianne Rawlins, marianne.rawlins to be human, one that bears witness @jamespembrokemedia.co.uk Advertising: Hannah Sarsfield, hannah. to the harm done by inequality and [email protected], discrimination to individuals, couples, 020 3859 7100 families and groups,’ says UKCP Chief Subscriptions: New Psychotherapist Executive Professor Sarah Niblock in is free to members of the UKCP. Non members can view the magazine at this issue. www.psychotherapy.org.uk/join/the- That’s why UKCP prioritises collaboration psychotherapist ANNA SCOTT with other organisations to campaign for Anna Scott has been a journalist and equal access to psychotherapy for everyone – editor for 20 years, writing about health, regardless of ethnicity, gender, age, sexuality, education and management issues. economic or mental health background. And She also works part time with primary that’s why, and because of an apparent rise school-aged children, and has a keen in prejudice across UK society, we have made interest in psychotherapy, along with psychology, completing a Bachelor of diversity and division the focus this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • "Good Without God": Happiness and Pleasure Among the Humanists
    Matthew Engelke "Good without God": happiness and pleasure among the humanists Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Engelke, Matthew (2015) "Good without God": happiness and pleasure among the humanists. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5 (3). pp. 69-91. ISSN 2049-1115 DOI: 10.14318/hau5.3.005 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2015 The Author CC BY 4.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65522/ Available in LSE Research Online: February 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. 2015 | Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (3): 69–91 SPECIAL ISSUE “Good without God” Happiness and pleasure among the humanists Matthew Engelke, London School of Economics and Political Science In this article, I explore conceptions of happiness and pleasure among secular humanists in Britain. Based on fieldwork among members of the British Humanist Association, and its associated local groups, I argue that happiness for the humanists is both the promise and demand of enlightenment, of an appeal to reason over and against what they see as the irrationality of religion. For them, happiness and pleasure are subjective experiences, but they are also indices of philosophical and ethical commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Linguistics Review 2016; 7(4): 449–470
    Applied Linguistics Review 2016; 7(4): 449–470 Zhu Hua* and Li Wei “Where are you really from?”: Nationality and Ethnicity Talk (NET) in everyday interactions DOI 10.1515/applirev-2016-0020 Abstract: The article examines the significance of questions such as “where are you really from?” in everyday conversational interactions. Defining this kind of talk as nationality and ethnicity talk (NET), i. e. discourse that either explicitly or inexpli- citly evokes one’s nationality or ethnicity in everyday conversation, the paper discusses what constitutes NET, how it works through symbolic and indexical cues and strategic emphasis, and why it matters in the wider context of identity, race, intercultural contact and power relations. The discussion draws on social media data including videos, blogs, on-line comments and the authors’ observa- tions, and focuses on NET around Asian people living outside Asia. It argues that the question “where are you really from” itself does not per se contest immigrants’ entitlement. However, what makes difference to the perception of whether one is an “interloper”–someone who is not wanted – is the “tangled” history, memory and expectation imbued and fuelled by power inequality. Keywords: nationality and ethnicity talk, folk theory of race, stereotype 1 Introduction “Where are you from?” is a question I like answering. “Where are you really from?” is a question I really hate answering… For Asian Americans, the ques- tions frequently come paired like that…. More than anything else that unites us, everyone with an Asian face who lives in America is afflicted by the perpetual foreigner syndrome. We are figuratively and even literally returned to Asia and ejected from America.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Neuer Atheismus'
    THOMAS ZENK ‘Neuer Atheismus’ ‘New Atheism’ in Germany* Introduction Matthias Knutzen (born 1646 – died after 1674) was some of the characteristics and remarkable traits of the first author we know of who self-identified as an the German discourse on the ‘New Atheism’. Here atheist (Schröder 2010: 8). Before this, the term had we can distinguish between two phases. The Ger­ solely been used pejoratively to label others. While man media initially characterised ‘New Atheism’ as a Knutzen is almost completely forgotten now, authors rather peculiarly American phenomenon. However, such as Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marx, Friedrich it soon came to be understood to be a part of German Nietzsche , or Sigmund Freud are better remembered culture as well. and might even be considered classic writers in the history of the atheist criticism of religion. Whatever may be said about the influence of any one of these The making of a German ‘New Atheism’ authors, there is no doubt that Germany looks back The terms ‘New Atheism’ and ‘New Atheist’ were on a notable history in this field. About a decade ago, originally coined in November 2006 by Gary Wolf, Germany’s capital Berlin was even dubbed ‘the world an American journalist and contributing editor at the capital of atheism’ by the American sociologist Peter lifestyle and technology magazine Wired, in the art­ L. Berger (2001: 195).1 icle ‘The Church of the Non­Believers’ (Wolf 2006a).3 Given this situation, I am bewildered by the ex­ Interestingly, only two weeks later, the term ‘New pression ‘New Atheism’.2 Yet, undoubtedly, the term Atheist’ appeared in the German media for the first has become a catchphrase that is commonly used in time.4 In a newspaper article in Die Tageszeitung dat­ the public discourse of several countries.
    [Show full text]
  • New Atheism and Secularism
    HYBRIS nr 42 (2018) ISSN: 1689-4286 TOMASZ SIECZKOWSKI UNIWERSYTET ŁÓDZKI NEW ATHEISM AND SECULARISM 1 Introduction The antagonism between the sacred and the secular is nothing new. For many centuries the competition between the church and the state was driven by the ultimate goal of winning the basic loyalty of the governed i.e. the flock. In the 1960’s and 1970’s it seemed that the conflict was resolved and secular ways of political practices took over for good. Since its beginning in the aftermath of 1648 Westphalia peace treaty secularism most often has been realized by political means even when passed off as a massive communal movement as it happened in the Leninist and Stalinist Soviet Union. In the Western states in turn secularism was well established governmental policy, with religions privatized and out of scope of both academia and politic transformations. And it would probably stay this way for some time longer if it hadn’t been for terrorist attacks in New York (2001), Madrid (2004) and London (2005). Those raised new and public reflections on the nature of institutionalized religions as well as created opportunities for renown authors to wage a war which a couple of years before seemed to had been won and forgotten. Most often the beginning of the so called new atheism1 is attributed to the notorious Sam Harris’ book The End of Reason (2004) written in the aftermath of 11/09 attacks. Soon after a plethora of interesting and massively influential books were published, Richard Dawkins’ God Delusion (2006), Daniel Dennett’s Breaking the Spell.
    [Show full text]
  • HUK+Adult+FW1920+Catalogue+-+
    Saving You By (author) Charlotte Nash Sep 17, 2019 | Paperback $24.99 | Three escaped pensioners. One single mother. A road trip to rescue her son. The new emotionally compelling page-turner by Australia's Charlotte Nash In their tiny pale green cottage under the trees, Mallory Cook and her five-year- old son, Harry, are a little family unit who weather the storms of life together. Money is tight after Harry's father, Duncan, abandoned them to expand his business in New York. So when Duncan fails to return Harry after a visit, Mallory boards a plane to bring her son home any way she can. During the journey, a chance encounter with three retirees on the run from their care home leads Mallory on an unlikely group road trip across the United States. 9780733636479 Zadie, Ernie and Jock each have their own reasons for making the journey and English along the way the four of them will learn the lengths they will travel to save each other - and themselves. 384 pages Saving You is the beautiful, emotionally compelling page-turner by Charlotte Nash, bestselling Australian author of The Horseman and The Paris Wedding. Subject If you love the stories of Jojo Moyes and Fiona McCallum you will devour this FICTION / Family Life / General book. 'I was enthralled... Nash's skilled storytelling will keep you turning pages until Distributor the very end.' FLEUR McDONALD Hachette Book Group Contributor Bio Charlotte Nash is the bestselling author of six novels, including four set in country Australia, and The Paris Wedding, which has been sold in eight countries and translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • SFL Newsletter October 2018
    October 2018 “Kindness is a mark of faith, and whoever is not kind has no faith.” Inside this issue: (Prophet Muhammad, pbuh) Reset Communities and Refugees 2 Interfaith Week is nearly upon us and the Interfaith Forums across Surrey have Mole Valley Multi Faith Service 2 been busy organising events, please see page 7 onwards for events near you BAME Carers event 3 including, ‘Who do we think we are?’’, ‘Peace Celebration’ and “Building RE Commission Report 4 Bridges not Walls” Religious Leaders asked to Tackle 4 Terrorism: Have your say Kauser Akhtar Faith & Cultural Awareness Training 4 Faith Links Adviser Armistice 100 5 E: [email protected] Hate Crime 5 T: 01483 790334 W: www.surreyfaithlinks.org.uk Funding Opportunities 6 Upcoming Events 7 Woking Celebrate Peace Main Faith Festivals in Woking primary school children publicly displayed their peace posters and essays October 2018 on Saturday, 22nd September at Mercia Walk, in Woking People of Faith’s (WPOF) 6th annual International Day of Peace prize-giving. 1st: Jashn-e-Mehergan The audience comprised children, family, (Zoroastrian) 2nd: Simchat Torah (Jewish) friends and staff of The Marist, Westfield, 2nd: Gandhi Jayanti (Hindu) Barnsbury, St Mary’s CofE, Byfleet and New 9-17th: Navarati (Hindu) Monument primary schools and also secondary 20th: Conferring of Guruship on school students attending the Shah Jahan Guru Granth Sahib (Sikh) Mosque. About 60 people were in attendance, 24th: Pavarana Day (Buddhist) approximately 20 of whom were school children. The general public were also able to listen to and watch the ceremony. The Mayor of Woking, Councillor Will Forster, accompanied by the Mayoress, Hannah Thompson, presented the prizes to children for their work on the British Value they thought would contribute most to world peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions Origins of Christianity Visions Origins Of
    New Survey Results: PROFILES OF THE GODLESS Celebrating Reason and Humanity August/September 2009 Vol. 29 No. 5 THE THICS OF E COVER NEUROCHEMICAL ENHANCEMENT James J. Hughes Mark Walker Ronald A. Lindsay David Koepsell VISIONS AND THE PAUL KURTZ ORIGINS WENDY KAMINER OF OF CHRISTIANITY NAT HENTOFF Mary80% 1.5 K. BWR MatossianPD A/S 08 SHADIA B. DRURY 09 JAMES A. HAUGHT 7725274 74957 Published by the Council for Secular Humanism We are committed to the application of reason and it for future generations, and to avoid inflicting need- science to the understanding of the universe and to the less solving suffering on other species. of human problems. We believe in enjoying life here and now and in We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, developing our creative talents to their fullest. to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, We believe in the cultivation of moral excellence. and to look outside nature for salvation. We respect the right to privacy. Mature adults should We believe that scientific discovery and technology be allowed to fulfill their aspirations, to express their can contribute to the betterment of human life. sexual We believe in an open and pluralistic society and that preferences, to exercise reproductive freedom, to have democracy is the best guarantee of protecting human access to comprehensive and informed health-care, rights from authoritarian elites and repressive majori- and to die with dignity. ties. We believe in the common moral decencies: altruism, We are committed to the principle of the integrity, honesty, truthfulness, responsibility. Humanist separation of church and state.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientism, Humanism, and Religion: the New Atheism and the Rise of the Secular Movement
    SCIENTISM, HUMANISM, AND RELIGION: THE NEW ATHEISM AND THE RISE OF THE SECULAR MOVEMENT STEPHEN LEDREW A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SOCIOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2013 © STEPHEN LEDREW, 2013 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the New Atheism as a secular fundamentalism that is both a utopian ideology and a social movement. It situates New Atheist thought within the context of the historical development of atheist thought and outlines the features of the ideology it promotes. It also examines the New Atheism’s role in the secular movement through research on major movement actions, campaigns, and debates on goals and strategies. It argues that the New Atheism comes into conflict with two other movement discourses: secular humanism and libertarian rationalism. These ideological conflicts are propelling the movement away from the New Atheism’s aggressive critique of religion toward more a more accommodating and inclusive approach that emphasizes basic humanistic values. ii DEDICATION For the love and support they have given me all my life, I dedicate this dissertation to my parents, Paul and Daphne LeDrew. In the final months of writing, during the most difficult time, they gave me what no one else could: the comfort of home. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks are due first and foremost to my supervisor, Ratiba Hadj-Moussa. Her contribution to this dissertation as a scholarly mentor cannot be measured, but just as importantly, without her support and guidance through the difficult times that emerge during the course of completing a graduate degree, I never would have achieved this goal.
    [Show full text]