DOCSLIB.ORG

Conflict Updates HUMANITARIAN CRISIS & HUMAN RIGHTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conflict Updates HUMANITARIAN CRISIS & HUMAN RIGHTS No. 3 | Winter 2018 CONFLICT UPDATERE BROUGHT TOCAP YOU BY THE KACHIN ALLIANCE Conflict Updates • There was at least one battle/ armed clash between the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) and Tatmadaw forces in 7 out of 31 days in October, 18 out of 30 days in November, and 26 out of 31 days in December. • During these three months, armed clashes between the KIA and Tatmadaw most frequently occurred inside and near Mansi Township in the southern region of Kachin State. The area of Danai Township experienced the second highest frequency of armed clashes. • Several provocations from the Tatmadaw consisted of fighter jets An IDP family braving the brutal winter of the Kachin region. Hkun Li Photo dropping bombs on KIA positions and sometimes, in the vicinity of IDP camps. HUMANITARIAN CRISIS & • On the Christmas Day alone, there were 2 armed clashes and 4 HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS incidents of provocation. October 2017 * Clashes Provocations • On October 3, when civilians with provisions attempted October 9 14 to cross into the Danai area, Tatmadaw soldiers stationed at Tawang Hka bridge turned them away and threw the provisions into the river. November 26 32 • On October 16 and 17, after getting ambushed by KIA December 56 92 troops, Tatmadaw soldiers randomly fired at by-passers, injuring a civilian in his leg. * Any incident of gun firing, bombing or ambush that did not escalate to a battle is considered to be a provocation. Accordingly, any provocation that escalated to a battle is counted as a clash and excluded from the provocation tally. These figures indicate the number of provocations initiated by either Tatmadaw or the KIA troops on one another. Page 1 of 3 No. 3 | Winter 2018 [Humanitarian Crisis & Human Rights Violations continue] November 2017 OTHER UPDATES • On November 11, Npawp Lu Ing, a mother of two • According to classified information who was eight months pregnant, was reported to have The Irrawaddy received, the previous been fatally struck by a vehicle driven by a Tatmadaw government issued ownership brigadier general in Hpakant. documents of 170,000 acres of land vacated by the IDPs to companies • On November 23, three civilians, Mr. Aung Soe, Mr. and individuals between 2013 and Win Naing, and Mr. Min Aye, stepped on a landmine 2014 in Waingmaw Township alone. and were injured near Tawng Ya mine in the Indawgyi Similarly, in Mansi Township, there area of Kachin State. are some 20,000 acres that • On November 24, Nampaka-based Tatmadaw companies and individuals are troops have reportedly fired artillery rounds on Maiyu trying to obtain licenses to use. The Lay IDP camp, which hosts 138 households and 700 Irrawaddy reporter noted, “IDPs are IDPs; 5 temporary houses inside the camp was unaware of the fate of their land… damaged in this incident. and hope to return at some stage.” December 2017 • In October, when inquired about Nlam Bawk Nan, who was taken by • The Irrawaddy reported in early December that the Tatmadaw troops on June 20, locals in Danai Township were running out of fuel and the Tatmadaw claimed that although experiencing rice shortage because the Tatmadaw has he was in their custody, they do not restricted the transportation of basic commodities in know his whereabouts, because he the township. had run away. • On December 4, Mr. Paw Se Hawng, 63, of Man • On October 27, the Lashio District Mau village stepped on a landmine while cleaning his Court convicted Dumdaw Nawng Lat, yard and was injured. 67, an ethnic Kachin religious leader, • On December 7, after getting ambushed by KIA of criminal defamation for an troops at Nawng Hkam Bum, Tatmadaw soldiers interview he gave to Voice of randomly fired and injured a Kachin civilian in his left America in December 2016 in which shoulder. he alleged that Tatmadaw had attacked civilians during conflict with • On December 7, Mr. Aik Aung of Ginsi village ethnic armed groups. According to stepped on a landmine while fishing in U Ru and U Ra Fortify Rights, “Under international river junction and was injured. The next day, Mr. Ba law, criminal penalties, and Aung and wife, Mrs. Tangbau Lu Yan, also stepped on particularly imprisonment, are a landmine while on their way to go fishing; they lost considered disproportionate forms of their lives. punishment for defamation.” • On December 11 around 5pm, Tatmadaw troops stationed between Maw Swi and Dingga villages took • On December 12, the government into their custody Mr. Lama Seng Gawng, Mr. Mahka police force raided the office Yau Htung and Mr. Hkapawng Naw Mai, IDPs who compound of the Kachin were taking shelter at Man Maw Cultural Compound, Independence Organization’s because they were reportedly suspicious of the three Technical Advisory Team in Myitkyina IDPs. and conducted a search without a warrant. • On December 14, Tatmadaw forces dropped bombs in several areas of southern Kachin State. A civilian woman was injured by one of the dropped bombs. Page 2 of 3 No. 3 | Winter 2018 • On December 14 around 2pm, Tatmadaw troops took into their custody a Jan Mai Kawng Ra villager, Mr. Maru Tang Ji and a Bang Gaw Htingnu villager, Mr. Nhkum Tu Awng. Then they burned down several [ Other Updates continue] houses in Jan Mai Kawng Ra village. • On December 20, the UN’s • On December 14 around 4 pm, the Tatmadaw OHCHR website reported, “the troops in Hpau Daw village took village elders of Nam Government of Myanmar has Gut village and Hpau Daw village to question them informed UN Special Rapporteur regarding fishing dynamite and gun-firings that went Yanghee Lee that all access to the off in their area. When the village elders answered country has been denied and that they did not know who were responsible for the cooperation withdrawn for the said incidents, they were tortured by the troops. The duration of her tenure.” village elder of Hpau Daw village sustained serious injuries. Regarding this decision, Lee remarked, “This declaration of • On December 19, a primary school student from non-cooperation with my mandate Mong Paw Township, Shan State was killed by a can only be viewed as a strong landmine blast. indication that there must be something terribly awful • On December 19 around 3pm, five students who happening in Rakhine, as well as in were returning to Hu Na village after school were the rest of the country.” struck by a bomb. Aung Lin, 12, lost his life while Hkaing Lin Htun, 10, Tang Mai, 13, Tsai Aik Ung, 10, • On December 21, the United and Aik Htun, 8, were injured. The injured students States “imposed sanctions on 13 were treated at Lashio Hospital. ‘serious human rights abusers and • On December 23, a man was injured by a landmine corrupt actors’ including Tatmadaw in Wara Zut village, Hpakant Township, Kachin State. general Maung Maung Soe, who oversaw this year’s brutal • On December 23, mortar shells fell on a house in crackdown against the Rohingya Maiyu village, Muse Township, northern Shan State. A Muslim minority.” 12-year-old died from injuries to his abdomen. Three others—two men and a 3-year-old boy who lost his right leg—were also injured. • On December 24, Tatmadaw troops fired a few shells near the Woi Chyai IDP camp in Laiza. The attack reportedly came around 9 pm and was thought to be timed intentionally for the Christmas Eve celebration. Lahpai Kai Nan, 29, a volunteer teacher in the IDP camp, was injured in the neck and had her jaw and teeth shattered from shelling by the Tatmadaw. RECAP is a quarterly newsletter that aims to inform policymakers and relevant advocacy organizations of Kachins’ struggles and humanitarian crisis in the Kachin region. It is based on a wide-ranging news outlets and trustworthy local sources. It is in no way comprehensive. Kachin Alliance 1628 16th ST NW, Washington DC 20009 [email protected] (202) 299-9545 www.kachinalliance.org Page 3 of 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KACHIN STATE, BHAMO DISTRICT Bhamo Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census KACHIN STATE, BHAMO DISTRICT Bhamo Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Kachin State, Bhamo District Bhamo Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1: Map of Kachin State, showing the townships Bhamo Township Figures at a Glance 1 Total Population 135,877 2 Population males 66,718 (49.1%) Population females 69,159 (50.9%) Percentage of urban population 43.2% Area (Km2) 1,965.8 3 Population density (per Km2) 69.1 persons Median age 25.2 years Number of wards 13 Number of village tracts 45 Number of private households 24,161 Percentage of female headed households 29.7% Mean household size 4.9 persons 4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 30.5% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 64.8% Elderly population (65+ years) 4.7% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 54.2 Child dependency ratio 46.9 Old dependency ratio 7.3 Ageing index 15.5 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 97 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 94.7% Male 96.8% Female 93.0% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 7,448 5.5 Walking 2,977 2.2 Seeing 4,114 3.0 Hearing 2,262 1.7 Remembering 2,380 1.8 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship Scrutiny 81,655 74.7 Associate Scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • A Kachin Case Study
    MUSEUMS, DIASPORA COMMUNITIES AND DIASPORIC CULTURES A KACHIN CASE STUDY HELEN MEARS PHD 2019 0 Abstract This thesis adds to the growing body of literature on museums and source communities through addressing a hitherto under-examined area of activity: the interactions between museums and diaspora communities. It does so through a focus on the cultural practices and museum engagements of the Kachin community from northern Myanmar. The shift in museum practice prompted by increased interaction with source communities from the 1980s onwards has led to fundamental changes in museum policy. Indeed, this shift has been described as “one of the most important developments in the history of museums” (Peers and Brown, 2003, p.1). However, it was a shift informed by the interests and perspectives of an ethnocentric museology, and, for these reasons, analysis of its symptoms has remained largely focussed on the museum institution rather than the communities which historically contributed to these institutions’ collections. Moreover, it was a shift which did not fully take account of the increasingly mobile and transnational nature of these communities. This thesis, researched and written by a museum curator, was initiated by the longstanding and active engagement of Kachin people with historical materials in the collections of Brighton Museum & Art Gallery. In closely attending to the cultural interests and habits of overseas Kachin communities, rather than those of the Museum, the thesis responds to Christina Kreps’ call to researchers to “liberate our thinking from Eurocentric notions of what constitutes the museum and museological behaviour” (2003, p.x). Through interviews with individual members of three overseas Kachin communities and the examination of a range of Kachin-related cultural productions, it demonstrates the extent to which Kachin people, like museums, are highly engaged in heritage and cultural preservation, albeit in ways which are distinctive to normative museum practices of collecting, display and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Monitor No.49
    Euro-Burma Office 10 November 22 November 2010 Election Monitor ELECTION MONITOR NO. 49 DIPLOMATS OF FOREIGN MISSIONS OBSERVE VOTING PROCESS IN VARIOUS STATES AND REGIONS Representatives of foreign embassies and UN agencies based in Myanmar, members of the Myanmar Foreign Correspondents Club and local journalists observed the polling stations and studied the casting of votes at a number of polling stations on the day of the elections. According the state-run media, the diplomats and guests were organized into small groups and conducted to the various regions and states to witness the elections. The following are the number of polling stations and number of eligible voters for the various regions and states:1 1. Kachin State - 866 polling stations for 824,968 eligible voters. 2. Magway Region- 4436 polling stations in 1705 wards and villages with 2,695,546 eligible voters 3. Chin State - 510 polling stations with 66827 eligible voters 4. Sagaing Region - 3,307 polling stations with 3,114,222 eligible voters in 125 constituencies 5. Bago Region - 1251 polling stations and 1057656 voters 6. Shan State (North ) - 1268 polling stations in five districts, 19 townships and 839 wards/ villages and there were 1,060,807 eligible voters. 7. Shan State(East) - 506 polling stations and 331,448 eligible voters 8. Shan State (South)- 908,030 eligible voters cast votes at 975 polling stations 9. Mandalay Region - 653 polling stations where more than 85,500 eligible voters 10. Rakhine State - 2824 polling stations and over 1769000 eligible voters in 17 townships in Rakhine State, 1267 polling stations and over 863000 eligible voters in Sittway District and 139 polling stations and over 146000 eligible voters in Sittway Township.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.2.1.6 Zhejiang Fangyuan Wood Co., Ltd. 8.2.1.7 Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd
    Part A Global Witness Research and Investigations in China 2006-09 / 8 The Trade in Burmese Timber on China’s Eastern Seaboard 8.2.1.6 Zhejiang Fangyuan Wood Co., Ltd. 8.2.1.7 Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd. “Discipline and Flexibility, the unity of the dichotomy in Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd. is one of China’s Chinese traditional wisdom, reminds us of the enclosed largest producers of engineered flooring with an annual square doors in ancient courtyards that stand erect firmly output of 200,000 m2, at the time of Global Witness’ and persistently, which only when guided with a pair of 2 round knockers can open to a more capacious space.” visit, and planned to increase this to 500,000 m from Fangyuan company brochure, 2006 October 2006. All of the company’s production was destined for the export market. Production was focused Fangyuan is one of the leading companies in Nanxun on oak, padauk (Pterocarpus macrocarpus)e7 and teak Town, outside Shanghai, where about 200 companies from Burma, sourced by the Burma-China border and manufacturing wood products are located. In 2006, available at the time of Global Witness’ visit. One of Fangyuan specialised in flooring made from timber the company’s sales representatives explained that while sourced in Burma; 50% of its supply originated in New Sihe Wood had faced some problems with supply, Burma. It was also one of the few companies that due to the restrictions imposed by the Burmese told Global Witness that it had found it very difficult government, it was, “almost okay now”.212 to import timber across the Burma-China border As for certificates for legality or sustainability, the following the new restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS in KACHIN Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN Photo credits Mike Adair Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research A photo record of the UNDP Governance Mapping Trip for Kachin State. Travel to Tanai, Putao, Momauk and Myitkyina townships from Jan 6 to Jan 23, 2015 is available here: http://tinyurl.com/Kachin-Trip-2015 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Kachin State 7 2.1 Kachin geography 9 2.2 Population distribution 10 2.3 Socio-economic dimensions 11 2.4 Some historical perspectives 13 2.5 Current security situation 18 2.6 State institutions 18 3. Methodology 24 3.1 Objectives of mapping 25 3.2 Mapping tools 25 3.3 Selected townships in Kachin 26 4. Governance at the front line – Findings on participation, responsiveness and accountability for service provision 27 4.1 Introduction to the townships 28 4.1.1 Overarching development priorities 33 4.1.2 Safety and security perceptions 34 4.1.3 Citizens’ views on overall improvements 36 4.1.4 Service Provider’s and people’s views on improvements and challenges in selected basic services 37 4.1.5 Issues pertaining to access services 54 4.2 Development planning and participation 57 4.2.1 Development committees 58 4.2.2 Planning and use of development funds 61 4.2.3 Challenges to township planning and participatory development 65 4.3 Information, transparency and accountability 67 4.3.1 Information at township level 67 4.3.2 TDSCs and TMACs as accountability mechanisms 69 4.3.3 WA/VTAs and W/VTSDCs 70 4.3.4 Grievances and disputes 75 4.3.5 Citizens’ awareness and freedom to express 78 4.3.6 Role of civil society organisations 81 5.
    [Show full text]
  • New IDP Population Movements in Kachin and Northern Shan States: 27 Nov 2012 - 7 Jan 2013
    New IDP population movements in Kachin and Northern Shan States: 27 Nov 2012 - 7 Jan 2013 DRAFT 14+15 & 19 November 2012: heavy artillery • In addition to the approximately 75,000 fired 8-10 times from the Government Army people who remain displaced across Military Base in the direction of KIA troops Kachin State and Northern Shan States, 16 November:stationed KBC Hpakan in La reported Maung west that ofthere Hpakan Town have been around 2,000 Government troops reports indicate at least 2,000 newly- moving along the Mogaung-Hpakan road displaced people due to recent fighting, over the last few days. since mid-December 2012. • Armed actions in the surroundings of Laiza have reportedly led to an additional 700 Internally Displaced People (IDPs) in camps located in the area between Laiza and Pang War. • Reports indicate over 400 new IDPs from Mansi Township now accommodated in La Jar Yang(near Laiza): On 14 December, the Bhamo town. government artilleries based in Dawtphoneyang fired • In Northern Shan State, there are reports around 100 times in the direction of the KIA troops of approximately 1,000 displaced in Kutkai stationed in La Jar Yang area, only 4 mile away from town. the KIO/KIA headquarter in Laiza. IRRC informed that • The number of security incidents has government helicopters attacked the KIA troops in La increased significantly since mid- Jar Yang on 4 December: attack with 3 helicopters December 2012. They have included the around 11:00 hrs and with 2 helicopters around 15;00 destruction of bridges and other hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Ethnic Issues (Kachin & Shan)
    Current Ethnic Issues (Kachin & Shan) Report By Foreign Affairs United Nationalities Federal Council (UNFC) Date: 7th July, 2011 “Current Kachin Conflict & list of Internally Displaced People” 1) On June, 8th 2011 KIA arrested 3 servicemen of Burma Army Light Infantry Battalion 437 (Including 2 officers) who covertly entered into KIO’s restricted area to gather intelligence. At 5:00 pm, Burma Army soldiers stormed into KIO liaison office in Sang Gang Village and arbitrarily arrested Liaison officer Lance Corporal Chyang Ying. 2) On June 9th at 7:00am, 200 Burma Army soldiers marched into Sang Gang Post unannounced and started shooting at KIA troops. KIA shot back and fire fight lasted close to three hours. 3 Burma Army soldiers killed and 6 injured. And, 2 KIA soldiers injured. KIA negotiated with the Northern Command Burma Army to exchange 3 Burma Army captives for all of KIA servicemen captured in the past years and also Liaison Officer Chyang Ying. Burma Army replied that all other captives have been forwarded to the courts since we are the government that is governed by the rule of law. However, we still have Chyang Ying in our custody, and if desired he could be exchanged for the 3 captives in your custody. 3) On June 10th 2011, in good faith, KIA obliged to their request, and release the 2 officers and 1 private. When Chyang Ying was to be returned, five Burma Army soldiers carried his corpse to bring back his dead body. The Liaison Officer was inhumanely tortured and brutally beaten during interrogation and laid under the sun on the front lawn of the Burma Army post.
    [Show full text]
  • Kahrl Navigating the Border Final
    CHINA AND FOREST TRADE IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION: IMPLICATIONS FOR FORESTS AND LIVELIHOODS NAVIGATING THE BORDER: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CHINA- MYANMAR TIMBER TRADE Fredrich Kahrl Horst Weyerhaeuser Su Yufang FO RE ST FO RE ST TR E ND S TR E ND S COLLABORATING INSTITUTIONS Forest Trends (http://www.forest-trends.org): Forest Trends is a non-profit organization that advances sustainable forestry and forestry’s contribution to community livelihoods worldwide. It aims to expand the focus of forestry beyond timber and promotes markets for ecosystem services provided by forests such as watershed protection, biodiversity and carbon storage. Forest Trends analyzes strategic market and policy issues, catalyzes connections between forward-looking producers, communities, and investors and develops new financial tools to help markets work for conservation and people. It was created in 1999 by an international group of leaders from forest industry, environmental NGOs and investment institutions. Center for International Forestry Research (http://www.cifor.cgiar.org): The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), based in Bogor, Indonesia, was established in 1993 as a part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) in response to global concerns about the social, environmental, and economic consequences of forest loss and degradation. CIFOR research produces knowledge and methods needed to improve the wellbeing of forest-dependent people and to help tropical countries manage their forests wisely for sustained benefits. This research is conducted in more than two dozen countries, in partnership with numerous partners. Since it was founded, CIFOR has also played a central role in influencing global and national forestry policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report for Identifying the Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Myanmar
    Background report for identifying the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar 8 February 2017 Author: Gabrielle Kissinger Contributors: Phyu Phyu San, Franz Arnold, Dr. Myat Su Mon, Daw Naw Ei Ei Min Acknowledgements: The author would like to recognize the thoughtful contributions made by the following peer reviewers: Dr. Thaung Naing Oo, Dr. Myat Su Mon, and the members of the Members of Driver and Strategies TWG, including: Daw Aye Win, Daw Thida Aye, U Mg Mg Lwin, Daw Wint Wint Htun, Daw Chan Myae Nyein, U Nyunt Linn, U Than Swe, U Htin Aung Kyaw, U Paing Htet Thu, U Thu Rain Htay, Daw Thiri Sandar Zaw, Daw Naw Ei Ei Min, U Myo Ko Ko, Michael Howard, U A Moe Naing, U Naing Lin Oo, U Pe Chit, U Tint Khine, Dr. Yazar Min, U Thwar Kyint Khine, Dr. Chaw Chaw Sein, Dr. Nyunt Khaing, Daw Phyu Phyu Swe, U Thein Saung, U Myo Aung, U Htay Aung, U Tin Naing Soe. The following peer reviewers also contributed comments: Hugh Speechley, Kevin Woods, Richard Holloway, Alexandra Speidel, Davyth Stewart, Art Blundell, Alex Diment, Rob Tizzard, Ivo Mulder. 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT 24 2. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY 27 2.1 METHODOLOGY 31 3. DIRECT DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION 32 3.1. METHODOLOGY 32 3.2 FOREST COVER CHANGE AND COUNTRY CONTEXT 33 3.2.1 REGIONAL AND FOREST-TYPE PATTERNS OF NOTE 40 3.3 DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION 44 3.3.1 AGRICULTURE 44 3.3.2 MINING 53 3.3.3 HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT 54 3.3.4 INFRASTRUCTURE (ROADS, PIPELINES, SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES, POWER LINES) 54 3.3.5 SUMMARY 54 3.4 DRIVERS OF FOREST DEGRADATION 55 3.4.1 ILLEGAL LOGGING 56 3.4.2 OVER-EXPLOITATION OF FOREST RESOURCES 57 3.4.3 FUEL WOOD USE 61 3.4.4 SHIFTING CULTIVATION 64 3.4.5 SUMMARY 66 3.5 ACTORS AND MOTIVATIONS 66 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 ERF Annual Report
    Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund Myanmar Credit: ADRA Myanmar Annual Report 2012 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund – Myanmar Annual Report 2012 Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator The Humanitarian Multi-Stakeholder Fund (HMSF) is In 2012, the HMSF demonstrated that it is an essential the Emergency Response Fund for Myanmar. The HMSF humanitarian funding tool that addresses urgent needs of provides rapid and flexible funding to address the urgent displaced people in remote areas in Myanmar where humanitarian needs of people in insecure areas, including access remains limited for the international community. those internally displaced. This in-country funding During the reporting period, the HMSF supported five mechanism facilitates the coordination of emergency projects implemented by five international non- response activities, strengthens partnerships, and governmental organisations (INGO) in partnership with complements existing funding channels in Myanmar. It five CBOs. enables humanitarian partners to meet the short-term emergency needs of vulnerable communities. The HMSF The establishment of partnerships between INGOs and is not intended to support activities that are outside the CBOs proved to be a successful strategy, enabling the scope of the humanitarian response or which could be HMSF to reach a wider number of beneficiaries and to better addressed through development channels. develop the capacity of local organisations. The international community’s determination to support Through the implementation of HMSF-funded projects, humanitarian operations in Myanmar has led to various around 35,000 people received assistance in 2012. creative initiatives to ensure those most in need are assisted. The HMSF represents an innovative approach to Project activities impacted the life of beneficiaries by: targeting populations otherwise inaccessible to improving access to safe and clean water; improving international agencies and organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Dynamics and Protection of Civilians in Kachin State
    PWG Update Conflict Dynamics and Protection of Civilians in Kachin State September 2016 Objectives: a) To provide an update on the Protection Analyses1 on the conflict dynamics in Kachin State, particularly as related to Protection of Civilians. b) To draw attention to the increased tension and conflict in close proximity to IDP camps and civilian residences and call on all parties to the conflict to respect the civilian character of these camps and communities. c) To facilitate, drive and inform discussion and response to Protection concerns in Kachin state within the PWG, the Inter Cluster Working Group, the AHCT and HCT, particularly in relation to Protection and Advocacy on key issues, including Emergency Preparedness; d) To provide a reminder and guidance of obligations to meet relevant international standards on the Protection of Civilians, with a particular focus on the responsibilities of parties to the conflict under International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law and Criminal Law. e) To initiate discussion and form the basis of a coordinated advocacy strategy by PWG and other relevant stakeholders. BACKGROUND Since the breakdown of the ceasefire and resumption of fighting between the Myanmar Army and the KIA in Kachin State in 2011, several conflict related security and Protection trends have emerged including, but not limited to, use of landmines, use of heavy artillery in in proximity to civilian settlements and airstrikes as well as reports of increased human rights abuses targeting individuals. More than 91,000 people2 are currently forcibly displaced across Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and Non-Government Controlled Areas (NGCA) of Kachin. The PWG have been active throughout the conflict monitoring Protection concerns3.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Situation Update (2 - 8 August 2021) Summary
    Myanmar Situation Update (2 - 8 August 2021) Summary As 8 August 2021 marked for Myanmar the 33rd anniversary of the 1988 pro-democracy uprising, a historic protest movement in which the cry for democracy of Myanmar’s people was heard around the world, activists around the country renewed calls to end military rule once and for all. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) picked Brunei’s second foreign minister, Erywan Yusof, as its special envoy to Myanmar. He has been tasked with opening dialogue between the military rulers and their opponents in an effort to halt the violence, and stated that he should be given full access to all parties in Myanmar. 413 Myanmar civil society organizations released a statement rejecting the special envoy and expressing deep disappointment with ASEAN and their lack of inclusive decision-making process. The junta has approved the appointment as reported by state-controlled media. Myanmar's ambassador to the United Nations who is denounced by the junta, Kyaw Moe Tun said that an apparent threat had been made against him and that U.S. authorities had stepped up his security. Later, two Myanmar citizens were charged with one count of conspiracy to assault or violently attack him. If convicted, they can face a prison sentence of up to five years. Sources reported that conspirators accused of plotting an attack have military ties. Twenty-eight junta-backed political parties, including the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), on Wednesday released a joint statement that they would welcome the new elections the military junta says it will hold in the future.
    [Show full text]