DOCSLIB.ORG

The Powers of the Un General Assembly to Prevent and Respond to Atrocity Crimes: a Guidance Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Powers of the Un General Assembly to Prevent and Respond to Atrocity Crimes: a Guidance Document THE POWERS OF THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO PREVENT AND RESPOND TO ATROCITY CRIMES: A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT In collaboration with: A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT This document was written by Rebecca Barber, Research Fellow, Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, University of Queensland. APRIL 2021 PHOTO COVER PAGE: Jamtoli refugee camp, Bangladesh - October 26, 2017. Credit: Joel Carillet COMMUNICATIONS: Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect School of Political Science and International Studies The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia Email: [email protected] http://www.r2pasiapacific.org/index.html THE POWERS OF THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO PREVENT AND RESPOND TO ATROCITY CRIMES: A GUIDANCE DOCUMENT i FOREWORD Around the world, atrocity crimes are being committed with devastating effect, and in many cases, seemingly with impunity. The United Nations is currently proving itself unable to either prevent such crimes, or adequately respond to them when they occur. In 1945, the Charter of the United Nations was adopted to ‘save succeeding generations from the scourge of war’, ‘reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights’, and ‘establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from … international law can be maintained’. It marked a high point in international cooperation and commitment to protect human rights; as did the affirmation by the UN General Assembly in 2005 that the ‘international community, through the United Nations’, has the ‘responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means … to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.’ These laudable statements must continue to serve as the benchmarks against which member states of the UN should hold themselves to account. The UN Security Council, albeit having primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security, is in many cases unable to effectively prevent atrocity crimes due to irreconcilable divisions amongst its permanent members. Civilians caught up in conflict, and the victims of atrocity crimes everywhere, are paying the price. It is, therefore, timely for UN member states to explore the various ways in which the UN General Assembly can more effectively utilise its own powers to prevent atrocity crimes, and respond to them when they occur. The General Assembly cannot pass legally binding resolutions, nor does it have the power to enforce its recommendations. The General Assembly is, however, the only truly representative organ within the UN system, and is explicitly empowered by the UN Charter to make recommendations relating to human rights, and on matters of international peace ii FOREWORD and security. It also has the distinct advantage of the adoption of a procedural resolution of the being unencumbered by the veto of any single General Assembly, placing the Responsibility member state. to Protect as a standing item on the agenda of the General Assembly, as well as requesting the This Guidance Document on the Legal Options UN Secretary General to report annually on the Available to the UN General Assembly to Prevent prevention of atrocity crimes. If successful, these and Respond to Atrocity Crimes is timely and developments will significantly increase the relevant. It provides a much-needed resource opportunities for all member states to contribute regarding what the General Assembly can do, to better prevention of atrocity crimes, including based on the UN Charter and other sources of through the General Assembly. international law, as well as the Assembly’s own established practice. None of this means giving up on the Security Council. To the contrary, initiatives aimed at Some of the interpretations of the General promoting the complementary engagement of Assembly’s powers described in this Guide are the General Assembly in matters of international controversial. Because the Document is intended peace and security, as well as initiatives aimed at to facilitate an enhanced role for the General providing additional opportunities for all member Assembly in preventing and responding to atrocity States to assess the Security Council’s performance, crimes, it inevitably, by its very nature, promotes can surely serve only to strengthen the integrity an interpretation of the Assembly’s powers that and accountability of the international system as enables it to fulfil such a role. It does also, however, a whole. This, in turn, will benefit not only the clearly acknowledge controversies, and where the populations suffering the effects of atrocity crimes, Document includes interpretations that diverge but the legitimacy of the international security from the traditional consensus regarding the system. Assembly’s powers, this is explicitly recognised. The Guidance Document describes what could be done, not what should be done. It provides political Ivan Šimonović decision-makers and diplomats with a menu of Permanent Representative of Croatia to the United available legal options, leaving to them the task of Nations engaging in a cost-benefit analysis regarding which options might feasibly be used in any particular Former Special Advisor to the UN Secretary-General case, when the international community is faced on the Responsibility to Protect with the threat or actual occurrence of atrocity crimes. This forward is written in Ambassador Šimonović’s I sincerely hope this Guidance document will personal capacity and should not be construed inspire member states to give renewed attention as necessarily representing the position of the to the powers of the General Assembly to prevent Government of Croatia. and respond to atrocity crimes. It should, moreover, significantly assist legal advisors in Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Permanent Missions to the UN in New York to advise decision-makers on available options. Right now, the Group of Friends of the Responsibility to Protect in New York is advocating iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The development of this guidance document has benefited from the input of a group of expert advisors, who reviewed and provided feedback on drafts, participated in an online consultation in November 2020, and engaged bilaterally with the author throughout the drafting process. They are listed below. The author, and APCR2P, would like to express their gratitude to these advisors for so generously sharing their time, wisdom and expertise. They played an indispensable role in the elaboration of the various points of law and practice covered by this guidance document. It should be noted that while every effort has been made to reflect the diversity of views expressed through the consultations, the positions expressed do not necessarily represent the unanimous views of the experts consulted. The author/APCR2P would like to thank the Human Rights Research and Education Centre at the University of Ottawa, in particular Professor John Packer (Neuberger-Jesin Professor of International Conflict Resolution in the Faculty of Law), for expertly supporting and hosting the expert consultation, as well as Blake Van Santen (Canadian Federal Court of Appeal) and Sahara Douglas (University of Ottawa) for support with note-taking. Blake Van Santen also provided excellent research assistance. The author is particularly grateful to Andrew Carswell, director of the International Rule of Law Initiative, whose founding of the International Rule of Law Initiative in early 2020 provided the impetus and framework for the development of the guidance document. Professor Michael Ramsden at the Chinese University of Hong Kong was also engaged in the initial planning for this project and provided valuable input throughout. Thanks are also due to the Universal Rights Group in Geneva, and in particular Marc Limon, for supporting with outreach on the subject of the powers of the UNGA. Finally, the author is grateful to Professor Alex Bellamy, director of the APCR2P Centre, as well as APCR2P Centre Manager Arna Chancellor, for their ongoing guidance and support. iv GROUP OF EXPERT ADVISORS CONSULTED The experts listed below contributed to the guidance document in their individual capacities. Affiliations are provided for identification purposes only. Nothing in the document necessarily represents the views of any state or organization with which they are or have been affiliated. Niels Blokker, Professor of International Devika Hovell, Associate Professor of Institutional Law (Schermers Chair), Leiden International Law, London School of Economics. University. Jan Klabbers, Professor of Law, University of Patrick Butchard, Lecturer in Law and Helsinki. Coordinator, International Justice and Human Graham Melling, Senior Lecturer in Law, Rights Unit, Edge Hill University. Northumbria University. Andrew Carswell, Director, International Rule of Michael Ramsden, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law Initiative and Fellow, Human Rights Research Law, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. and Education Centre, University of Ottawa. Allan Rock, President Emeritus and Professor of Alison Duxbury, Professor and Deputy Dean, Law, University of Ottawa and former Canadian Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne Ambassador to the UN. and Chair of the International Advisory Commission of the Commonwealth Human Rights Beth Van Schaack, Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor Initiative. of Human Rights, Stanford University and former Deputy to the Ambassador-at-Large for War Joanna Harrington, Professor and Eldon Foote Crimes Issues, Office
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Butcher, W. Scott
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project WILLIAM SCOTT BUTCHER Interviewed by: David Reuther Initial interview date: December 23, 2010 Copyright 2015 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Dayton, Ohio, December 12, 1942 Stamp collecting and reading Inspiring high school teacher Cincinnati World Affairs Council BA in Government-Foreign Affairs Oxford, Ohio, Miami University 1960–1964 Participated in student government Modest awareness of Vietnam Beginning of civil rights awareness MA in International Affairs John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies 1964–1966 Entered the Foreign Service May 1965 Took the written exam Cincinnati, September 1963 Took the oral examination Columbus, November 1963 Took leave of absence to finish Johns Hopkins program Entered 73rd A-100 Class June 1966 Rangoon, Burma, Country—Rotational Officer 1967-1969 Burmese language training Traveling to Burma, being introduced to Asian sights and sounds Duties as General Services Officer Duties as Consular Officer Burmese anti-Indian immigration policies Anti-Chinese riots Ambassador Henry Byroade Comment on condition of embassy building Staff recreation Benefits of a small embassy 1 Major Japanese presence Comparing ambassadors Byroade and Hummel Dhaka, Pakistan—Political Officer 1969-1971 Traveling to Consulate General Dhaka Political duties and mission staff Comment on condition of embassy building USG focus was humanitarian and economic development Official and unofficial travels and colleagues November
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of U.S. Women Diplomats Between 1945 and 2004 Rachel Jane Beckett
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 The Role of U.S. Women Diplomats Between 1945 and 2004 Rachel Jane Beckett Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE ROLE OF U.S. WOMEN DIPLOMATS BETWEEN 1945 AND 2004 BY RACHEL JANE BECKETT A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2009 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Rachel Beckett defended on December 10, 2008. ____________________________________ Suzanne Sinke Professor Directing Thesis ____________________________________ Charles Upchurch Committee Member ___________________________________ Michael Creswell Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv Abstract v INTRODUCTION 1 1. ACCOMPLISHED BUT STILL LAGGING BEHIND 13 2. “PERCEPTION” AS THE STANDARD 29 3. STRATEGICAL GATEKEEPERS 48 CONCLUSION 68 REFERENCES 74 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 83 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Degree Type 17 Table 1.2 Degree Concentration 17 Table 1.3 Number of Foreign Languages Spoken 18 Table 1.4 Type of Languages Spoken 19 Table 1.5 Female Chiefs of Mission by Region, 1933-2004 27 Table 2.1 Where Female Ambassadors are Most Frequently Assigned 34 Table 2.2 Percent of Women in National Legislatures, by region, 1975-97 35 Table 2.3 Appointment of Women as Chiefs of Mission and to other Senior Posts by Administration, 1933-2004 44 iv ABSTRACT Though historical scholarship on gender and international relations has grown over the last few decades, there has been little work done on women in the Foreign Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Diplomacy by Intergovernmental Organizations: Learning from Practice
    International Negotiation 17 (2012) 349–388 brill.com/iner Preventive Diplomacy by Intergovernmental Organizations: Learning from Practice Eileen F. Babbitt*, 1 !e Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, 160 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA (E-mail: [email protected]) Received 29 July 2012; accepted 12 August 2012 Abstract Conflict prevention is enjoying a renaissance in international policy circles. However, the official machin- ery of the international community presently offers few institutions with a specific mandate to address the causes of political violence at an early stage. One such multilateral mechanism dedicated solely to the prevention of conflict is the High Commissioner on National Minorities (HCNM) of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Over two decades, the office has developed a signifi- cant track record of effectiveness against which to examine the preventive efforts of other intergovern- mental organizations. In this article, we examine the prevention efforts of the HCNM in Georgia, Macedonia, and Ukraine and compare these with the preventive diplomacy of three other intergovern- mental organizations (IGOs): the Organization of American States (OAS) in Guyana, the Common- wealth in Fiji, and the UN in Afghanistan, Burundi, and Macedonia. Our findings offer some useful and surprising insights into effective prevention practice, with implications for how IGOs might improve preventive diplomacy in the future. *) Eileen F. Babbitt is Professor of Practice in international conflict management, Director of the Inter- national Negotiation and Conflict Resolution Program, and co-director of the Program on Human Rights and Conflict Resolution at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\53-2\HLI202.txt unknown Seq: 1 22-MAY-12 12:26 Volume 53, Number 2, Summer 2012 Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform Bart M.J. Szewczyk Table of Contents Introduction .............................................. 451 R I. Identifying the Security Council’s Problem ....... 452 R A. Conventional Critiques and Reforms ................... 455 R B. Misdiagnoses of the Council’s Power ................... 458 R C. Misdiagnoses of the Council’s Legitimacy................ 462 R D. Theoretical Limitations of Existing Reforms ............. 466 R II. Interpreting the Security Council’s Purpose ...... 471 R A. Text, Context, and Practice of Article 24 ............... 472 R B. Uncertainty of Law and Power in Complex Orders ....... 475 R C. Empirical Analysis of Legitimacy ..................... 480 R D. Norms of Legitimacy ................................ 483 R III. Inclusive Contextual Cooperation in the United Nations ............................................. 488 R A. Development of Shared Understandings ................. 488 R B. Expected Future Scenarios of the World ................. 495 R C. Reforms for the Security Council....................... 497 R D. Reforms for the General Assembly ..................... 499 R IV. Conclusion ......................................... 500 R \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\53-2\HLI202.txt unknown Seq: 2 22-MAY-12 12:26 450 Harvard International Law Journal / Vol. 53 Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform Bart M.J. Szewczyk* One of the fundamental international law questions over the past two decades has been the structure of the United Nations Security Council. In a world of variable multipolarity, whereby changing crises demand different combinations of actors with relevant resources and shared interests, the Council’s reform should be based not on expanded permanent membership—as mistakenly held by conventional wisdom—but on inclusive contextual participation in decisionmaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus
    Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus DECEMBER 2011 INTERNATIONAL PEACE INSTITUTE Cover Photo: UN Secretary-General ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ban Ki-moon (left) is received by Guillaume Soro, Prime Minister of IPI owes a debt of thanks to its many donors, whose Côte d'Ivoire, at Yamoussoukro support makes publications like this one possible. In partic - airport. May 21, 2011. © UN ular, IPI would like to thank the governments of Finland, Photo/Basile Zoma. Norway, and Sweden for their generous contributions to The views expressed in this paper IPI's Coping with Crisis Program. Also, IPI would like to represent those of the authors and thank the Mediation Support Unit of the UN Department of not necessarily those of IPI. IPI Political Affairs for giving it the opportunity to contribute welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit to the process that led up to the Secretary-General's report of a well-informed debate on critical on preventive diplomacy. policies and issues in international affairs. IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Editor and Senior Fellow Marie O’Reilly, Publications Officer Suggested Citation: Francesco Mancini, ed., “Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus,” New York: International Peace Institute, December 2011. © by International Peace Institute, 2011 All Rights Reserved www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Introduction . 1 Francesco Mancini Preventive Diplomacy in Africa: Adapting to New Realities . 4 Fabienne Hara Optimizing Preventive-Diplomacy Tools: A Latin American Perspective . 15 Sandra Borda Preventive Diplomacy in Southeast Asia: Redefining the ASEAN Way . 28 Jim Della-Giacoma Preventive Diplomacy on the Korean Peninsula: What Role for the United Nations? . 35 Leon V.
    [Show full text]
  • Cl 167 List of Delegates and Observers Liste Des
    WEB ANNEX ANNEXE WEB ANEXO PARA EL WEB ________________________________________________________________ 167th SESSION OF THE FAO COUNCIL, 29 JUNE 2021 167e SESSION DU CONSEIL DE LA FAO, 29 JUIN 2021 167.º PERÍODO DE SESIONES DEL CONSEJO DE LA FAO, 29 DE JUNIO DE 2021 ________________________________________________________________ LIST OF DELEGATES AND OBSERVERS LISTE DES DÉLÉGUÉS ET OBSERVATEURS LISTA DE DELEGADOS Y OBSERVADORES Independent Chairperson Président indépendant : Mr Hans Hoogeveen Presidente Independiente Vice Chairpersons : Ms Maria de Fatima Jardim (Angola) Vice-présidents : Mr Mohamed Elmouataz Osman (Sudan) Vice Presidentes : Ms Alison Storsve (United States of America) CL167 1 MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL MEMBRES DU CONSEIL MIEMBROS DEL CONSEJO AFGHANISTAN - AFGANISTÁN Sr. Guillermo SPIKA Segundo Secretario Head of Delegation Representante Permanente Alterno ante la Mr Khaled Ahmad ZEKRIYA FAO Ambassador Roma Permanent Representative to FAO Rome AUSTRALIA - AUSTRALIE Alternate(s) Head of Delegation Mr Rahman Nazar BELIM Ms Lynda HAYDEN Second Secretary Counsellor Alternate Permanent Representative to Deputy Permanent Representative to FAO FAO Rome Rome Alternate(s) ANGOLA Ms Ruth MALLETT Agriculture Advisor Chef de délégation Embassy of Australia Mme Maria de Fatima JARDIM Rome Ambassadeur Représentante permanente auprès de la BAHAMAS FAO Rome Head of Delegation Ms Koschina MARSHALL Suppléant(s) Office of the Attorney General M. Carlos AMARAL Nassau Ministre Conseiller Représentant permanent adjoint auprès de Alternate(s) la FAO Ms Sharon HAYLOCK Rome Director-General Ministry of Foreign Affairs ARGENTINA - ARGENTINE Nassau Jefe de Delegación Ms Verna GRANT Sr. Carlos Bernardo CHERNIAK Ambassador Embajador Permanent Mission of the Commonwealth Representante Permanente ante la FAO of the Bahamas to the United Nations Roma Office and other International Organizations Suplente(s) Geneva Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • General Conference
    GENERAL CONFERENCE SPECIAL EVENT WITH NEW YORK AMBASSADORS “Reflections on the International Development Agenda” Shaukat Quazi Fareed Moderator Ambassador (rtd) Fareed served as diplomat for Pakistan (Saudi Arabia, Spain, Portugal, Mexico and as Deputy Permanent Representative at the UN) till 1987 when he joined the UN Secretariat. For the past thirty years he has been involved with multilateral development issues and coordination of the UN system. From 2006 to 2011 he was Special Adviser to the Director- General of UNIDO. Currently, he is involved with several reform initiatives at the UN, is Adjunct Professor at Long Island University, and is writing based on his extensive professional experience. He received his Masters in Economics from Karachi University and Cambridge. Tekeda Alemu Permanent Representative of Ethiopia to the UN in New York Ambassador Tekeda Alemu has over thirty years of experience as a diplomat. He was appointed Ethiopian Permanent Representative to the UN in New York in January 2011. Previously, he served twenty years in his capacities as Deputy Foreign Minister and State Minister. Ambassador Alemu earned a B.A. and M.A. from UCLA and a Ph.D. from Claremont Graduate School. He taught at Addis Ababa University in the early 90's with the rank of Assistant Professor. Ken Kanda Permanent Representative of Ghana to the UN in New York Ambassador Kanda joined the Ghana Foreign Service in September 1976 and served in various capacities, including Director of the Economic, Trade and Investment Bureau of the Foreign Ministry. Prior to assuming his current position in NY in 2011, he was Director of State Protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Vatican Secret Diplomacy This Page Intentionally Left Blank Charles R
    vatican secret diplomacy This page intentionally left blank charles r. gallagher, s.j. Vatican Secret Diplomacy joseph p. hurley and pope pius xii yale university press new haven & london Disclaimer: Some images in the printed version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Copyright © 2008 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Scala and Scala Sans by Duke & Company, Devon, Pennsylvania. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gallagher, Charles R., 1965– Vatican secret diplomacy : Joseph P. Hurley and Pope Pius XII / Charles R. Gallagher. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-12134-6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Hurley, Joseph P. 2. Pius XII, Pope, 1876–1958. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Religious aspects—Catholic Church. 4. Catholic Church—Foreign relations. I. Title. BX4705.H873G35 2008 282.092—dc22 [B] 2007043743 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Com- mittee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To my father and in loving memory of my mother This page intentionally left blank contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1 A Priest in the Family 8 2 Diplomatic Observer: India and Japan, 1927–1934 29 3 Silencing Charlie: The Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Paper and Case Studies Capturing UN Preventive Diplomacy Success: How and Why Does It Work?
    United Nations University Centre for Policy Research UN Preventive Diplomacy April 2018 Policy Paper and Case Studies Capturing UN Preventive Diplomacy Success: How and Why Does It Work? Dr. Laurie Nathan Professor of the Practice of Mediation and Director of the Mediation Program, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame Adam Day Senior Policy Advisor, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan João Honwana Former Director in the UN Department of Political Affairs Dr. Rebecca Brubaker Policy Advisor, United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan © 2018 United Nations University. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-92-808-9077-8 Acknowledgements UNU-CPR is deeply grateful to the Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom to the United Nations for its support to this project. Special thanks go to Thomas Wheeler who was the focal point for both prevention-related projects. UNU-CPR worked in close partnership with the UN Department of Political Affairs throughout this project and benefited greatly from the time and substantive inputs of Teresa Whitfield and Dirk Druet in particular. UNU-CPR would like to thank participants for their contributions to the project’s mid-point peer-review process, including Roxaneh Bazergan, Richard Gowan, Michele Griffin, Marc Jacquand, Asif Khan, Karin Landgren, Ian Martin, Abdel- Fatau Musah, Jake Sherman, and Oliver Ulich. Numerous individuals provided helpful input for and feedback on the country case studies that form the empirical foundation for this project. They are acknowledged in the respective case study chapters in this volume. We are deeply grateful for their support. Finally, we are especially grateful to Emma Hutchinson for her invaluable editorial support to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    Participant List 10/20/2019 8:45:44 AM Category First Name Last Name Position Organization Nationality CSO Jillian Abballe UN Advocacy Officer and Anglican Communion United States Head of Office Ramil Abbasov Chariman of the Managing Spektr Socio-Economic Azerbaijan Board Researches and Development Public Union Babak Abbaszadeh President and Chief Toronto Centre for Global Canada Executive Officer Leadership in Financial Supervision Amr Abdallah Director, Gulf Programs Educaiton for Employment - United States EFE HAGAR ABDELRAHM African affairs & SDGs Unit Maat for Peace, Development Egypt AN Manager and Human Rights Abukar Abdi CEO Juba Foundation Kenya Nabil Abdo MENA Senior Policy Oxfam International Lebanon Advisor Mala Abdulaziz Executive director Swift Relief Foundation Nigeria Maryati Abdullah Director/National Publish What You Pay Indonesia Coordinator Indonesia Yussuf Abdullahi Regional Team Lead Pact Kenya Abdulahi Abdulraheem Executive Director Initiative for Sound Education Nigeria Relationship & Health Muttaqa Abdulra'uf Research Fellow International Trade Union Nigeria Confederation (ITUC) Kehinde Abdulsalam Interfaith Minister Strength in Diversity Nigeria Development Centre, Nigeria Kassim Abdulsalam Zonal Coordinator/Field Strength in Diversity Nigeria Executive Development Centre, Nigeria and Farmers Advocacy and Support Initiative in Nig Shahlo Abdunabizoda Director Jahon Tajikistan Shontaye Abegaz Executive Director International Insitute for Human United States Security Subhashini Abeysinghe Research Director Verite
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary
    ISSN 1088-2081 Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary Bruce W. Jentleson University of California, Davis Policy Paper # 27 June 1996 The author and IGCC are grateful to the Pew Charitable Trusts for generous support of this project. Author’s opinions are his own. Copyright © 1996 by the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation CONTENTS Defining Preventive Diplomacy ........................................................................................5 CONCEPTUAL PARAMETERS FOR A WORKING DEFINITION....................................................6 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MEASURING SUCCESS AND FAILURE.....................8 The Possibility of Preventive Diplomacy .........................................................................8 THE PURPOSIVE SOURCES OF ETHNIC CONFLICT ..................................................................8 CASE EVIDENCE OF OPPORTUNITIES MISSED........................................................................9 CASE EVIDENCE OF SUCCESSFUL PREVENTIVE DIPLOMACY ...............................................11 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................12 Possible, but Difficult.......................................................................................................12 EARLY WARNING................................................................................................................12 POLITICAL WILL .................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Peacemaking in Macedonia: an Assessment of U.N
    BYU Law Review Volume 2003 | Issue 2 Article 13 5-1-2003 Preventive Peacemaking in Macedonia: An Assessment of U.N. Good Offices Diplomacy David J. Ludlow Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation David J. Ludlow, Preventive Peacemaking in Macedonia: An Assessment of U.N. Good Offices Diplomacy, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 761 (2003). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2003/iss2/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LUD-FIN 5/31/2003 1:18 PM Preventive Peacemaking in Macedonia: An Assessment of U.N. Good Offices Diplomacy I. INTRODUCTION In March of 2001, ethnic Albanian rebels launched Macedonia1 into a violent civil conflict that made the international community hold its breath at the prospect of a new Balkan war. Until the hostilities of 2001, Macedonia had managed to remain virtually unsullied by the violent ethnic conflicts of its Balkan sister states. In part, Macedonia’s success was due to recognition by the United Nations (“UN”), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (“OSCE”), and other international actors of the fragile ethnic situation in Macedonia after the dissolution of the Communist bloc. As
    [Show full text]