Non-Contact Surface Metrology and Zegage Optical Profiler

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Non-Contact Surface Metrology and Zegage Optical Profiler Non‐Contact Surface Metrology and ZeGage Optical Profiler John Fabio Sam Banerjea Zygo Corporation ©2014 Zygo Corporation. All rights reserved. About Zygo • Zygo has 44 years experience in Metrology and Optical Systems. • Two main business divisions: – Metrology Solutions that provide process control for surface shape, surface texture, material characteristics, film thickness and feature position based on Zygo’s expertise in optical interferometry. – Optical Systems and Components ranging from meter-class plano optics to optical assemblies. • Publically traded (NASDAQ: ZIGO) since 1983. • Strong history of innovation and technology leadership with >300 patents issued. 2 How Zygo Measure Surfaces •For –Form – Roughness – Waviness – Structure – Relationships to other surfaces • And we want to do it – Quantitatively – Quickly – Easily – Without damaging the part 3 Benefits of Optical Methods • Full 3D topography scan • Picks up 1M+ data points • No damage to the surface • Fast scan speeds • Lower vertical noise Mechanical stylus 3D Optical metrology 4 A Look at Interferometry Several optical 3D metrology techniques are available today: • Vertical resolution down to nanometers, regardless of magnification • Fields of view from µm** to mm • Lateral feature size down to sub µm • High data density • Non contact, high speed • Machined, polished, burnished and ground surfaces • Complex surface structures From Laser Focus World, 1995 ** 1 micrometer = 39.37 microinches 5 3D Interference Microscopy 6 Interference Microscopy • An interference microscope is a conventional microscope with the addition of a beam splitter and reference mirror • Most interference microscopes are near-equal path systems, using filtered incandescent or LED light sources 7 Scanning the White Light Fringes • The two signals correspond to two camera pixels • In an actual system, there are about a scan million pixels and individual scan signals Signal A scan B A Signal B Height difference 8 Michelson Interference Objective • Equal path (usually) Pupil (location of source image) • Works with extended white light sources • Ideal for low-magnification objectives Reference mirror Object 9 Mirau Objective • Equal path (usually) • Works for white light • Requires an extended or off- axis source (because of central obscuration) • Best for high-magnification Reference mirror objectives (central obscuration) Beam splitter Object 10 A Complete Interference Microscope System • Designed for high precision on small objects • Includes staging, controls and software for surface texture analysis • Basic performance capabilities: – Surface topography repeatability – Lateral resolution – Measurement range – Correlation to stylus measurements – Vibration sensitivity 11 Wavelength and NA Set Optical Lateral Resolution • Sparrow criterion limit = common specification for a microscope • At low mag ( <20X ), the camera can be as important as the optics, reducing the effective resolution by “pixelization” Optical resolution at l = 560 nm Magnification NA Sparrow criterion (micrometers **) 1X 0.03 9.50 2X 0.055 5.18 2.75X 0.08 3.56 5.5X 0.15 1.90 10X 0.30 0.95 20X 0.40 0.71 50X 0.55 0.52 ** 1 micrometer = 39.37 microinches 12 Correlation to Stylus Measurements • Evaluation using a ZeGage interference microscope at Zygo compared to a stylus instrument at UNCC Center for Precision Metrology • Rubert reference specimens – 4 random samples with Ra= 0.02 µm … 0.15 µm – 8 sinusoidal samples with Ra = 0.1µm … 6.4 µm and pitch = 2.5 µm … 135 µm • Halle roughness standards – 2 samples with Ra= 0.024 µm and 0.22 µm 13 Summary of Ra: Random Specimens Sample name Stylus ZeGage, 10X ZeGage, 20X ZeGage, 50X Rubert 501 0.015 µm ‐ 0.016 µm 0.012 µm Rubert 502 0.035 µm ‐ 0.036 µm 0.031 µm Rubert 503 0.067 µm ‐ 0.095 µm 0.076 µm Rubert 504 0.119 µm ‐ 0.150 µm 0.130 µm Halle 2070/03 0.0238 µm 0.0237 µm 0.0239 µm ‐ Halle 2058/01 0.216 µm 0.237 µm 0.215 µm ‐ Graphical Representation Direct Comparison of Stylus and Optical of the 50X Results Profiles at 50X for the 502 Specimen R2=0.9964 14 Summary of Ra: Sinusoidal Specimens Sample Name Pitch Stylus ZeGage with 20X ZeGage with 50X Rubert 543 2.5 µm 0.018 µm ‐ 0.021 µm Rubert 542 8 µm 0.060 µm 0.048 µm 0.051 µm Rubert 529 10 µm 0.097 µm 0.108 µm 0.090 µm Rubert 531 100 µm 0.315 µm 0.316 µm 0.315 µm Rubert 528 50 µm 0.507 µm 0.506 µm 0.515 µm Rubert 530 100 µm 1.009 µm 1.012 µm 1.050 µm Rubert 527 100 µm 2.995 µm 3.025 µm 3.066 µm Rubert 525 135 µm 6.389 µm ‐ 6.362 µm Graphical Representation 2 R =0.9998 of the Above Results R2=1 Direct Comparison of Stylus and Optical Profiles at 20X for 528 Specimen 15 Comparing Scanning Methods Interferometry Stylus scan B A B A scan 16 Comparing Interferometry to Stylus Results Interferometry Interferometry Stylus Stylus 17 Potential Damage by Stylus Measurement Taken on Paper 18 Potential Damage by Stylus Measurement Taken on Paper 19 Common S Parameters Sa = Average Roughness Sq = Root Mean Square Roughness •Sa and Sq represent an overall measure of the texture comprising the surface Plateau-like Surface Sa = 16.03 nm • They are insensitive in differentiating peaks, Sq = 25.4 nm valleys and the spacing of the various texture features • Used to indicate significant deviations in the texture characteristics •Sa is primarily used for machined surfaces Surface with Peaks Sa = 16.03 nm •Sq is typically used to specify optical surfaces Sq = 25.4 nm 20 Common S Parameters Ssk = Skewness Sku = Kurtosis •Ssk and Sku represent symmetry and deviation from an ideal norm Surface with Multiple Peaks Ssk = 3.20 S = 18.71 •Ssk indicates the predominance of peaks or ku valleys •Sku shows inordinately high peaks/ deep valleys •Ssk is useful for honed surfaces and wear conditions Periodic Texture Ssk = 0.16 S = 1.63 •Sku is used to check presence of peaks and ku valleys 21 Common S Parameters Sp = Max Peak Height Sv = Max Valley Depth Spv (or Sz) = Max Height of Surface Printed surface with deep valley structures •Sp, Sv, and Spv are evaluated from the absolute highest and lowest points found on the surface. •Sp is the height of the highest point and Sv is the depth of the lowest point •Sp is used for sliding contact applications •Sv is related to fluid retention, lubrication or coatings Polymer surface prepared with asperities •Spv is the difference between Sp and Sv and is used to Sp = 0.90 µm characterize sealing surfaces and coatings Sv = -15µm 22 S Parameters to R Parameter Correlation Description Stylus ZeMaps Roughness Average Ra Sa Root Mean Square Rq Sq Peak Rp Sp Valley Rv Sv Total Height (Peak to Valley) Rt Spv (or Sz) Material Ratio Rmr Smr1 Smr2 Profile Height Pt PV Skewness Rsk Ssk Kurtosis Rku Sku Max Roughness Depth Rmax IsoSRmax Average Max Height Rz IsoSRz Base Roughness Depth R3z IsoSR3z Bearing Ratio (Core Roughness Depth) Rk MR-T-Sk Bearing Ratio (Reduced Peak Height) Rpk MR-T-Spk Bearing Ratio (Reduced Valley Depth) Rvk MR-T-Svk Bearing Ratio (Peak Material Component) Mr1 MR-T-Smr1 Bearing Ratio (Valley Material Component) Mr2 MR-T-Smr2 Waviness Parameters W Sa Waviness Height Wt PV Note: R parameters defined by ISO 4287, S parameters defined by ISO 25178-2 23 ISO 25178 : Geometric Product Specifications, Surface Texture: Areal • Standard prepared by WG16 of the ISO technical committee TC213. • ISO 25178 means a collection of international standards relating to the analysis of 3D areal surface texture. • First international standard for specification and measurement of 3D surface texture. • Standard describes applicable measurement technologies, calibration methods, and calibration standards/software that are required. • Standard covers non-contact measurement. 24 Form, Roughness and Waviness Segmentation • Segmentation is accomplished using Fourier transform methods… • … or more advanced spline-based methods • Cutoff limits (ls, lc, lf) are defined in standards: ISO 4287, ASME B46.1 (USA), JIS B0601 (Japan) 25 Calibration is Essential for Best Results • Like all metrology tools, coherent scanning interferometer systems should be calibrated for the following: – Accurate XY metrology • Lateral calibration standard – System form bias •SiCFlat – Vertical height scale • Step height standard 26 Specialized Objectives with Long Working Distance • For hard to reach areas, Michelson type objectives are available with 40 mm of working distance • Applications include measurements inside cones and cylinders using an auxiliary optic 3 mm Fold mirror 27 ZeGage Non-Contact Profiler • Entry-level optical evaluation of 3D form and surface finish on precision machined or fabricated surfaces. • Takes measurements of ISO-compliant roughness parameters, form, step-height and material wear. • Higher-precision alternative to traditional contact or touch-probe surface finish gages. • Vibration isolation elements built into the chassis. • Applications found in industrial manufacturing, R&D, quality inspection, failure analysis, wear analysis and more. • Markets served include medical, automotive, consumer electronics, military, and aerospace. 28 ZeGage Highlights • Built for shop floor and lab usage • ≤ 3.5 nm vertical resolution independent of magnification or vertical scan length • SureScan™ Technology eliminates the need for an isolation table • Novel through-the-lens focus aid assists part setup at exactly the area of measurement • Easy to use and learn ZeMaps software with ISO 25178-2* compliant surface parameters • 1X – 50X objectives available * ISO 25178-2:2012 - Geometrical Product Specifications - Surface texture: Areal -- Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters 29 ZeGage Design Features System Footprint: Z-Stage based scanner W: 525 mm enables scans up to 20 mm D: 525 mm Internal software Max H: 815 mm controlled focus aid illuminator Sealed Head cover has no manual controls or adjustments ZeMaps software on 64-bit Windows 7 Direct threaded Single objective standard.
Recommended publications
  • In This Issue Dealing with Surface Defects a New Standard for Calibration Specimens Surface Metrology
    Spring 2017 Surface imaging, analysis & metrology news from Digital Surf In this issue Dealing with surface defects A new standard for calibration specimens Surface metrology Resolving the problem of surface defects p. 2 How to 7 tips for producing SEM stereo pairs p. 4 Customer story My first project with MountainsMap® p. 6 Surface metrology Q&A What is form removal and Paul Rubert, reference standards expert, explains how a new international why is it important? standard, currently in preparation, will help metrologists deal with the problem p. 8 of surface defects Read article overleaf News in brief Events & product highlights p. 10 Social What's hot online p. 11 Scanning electron microscopy: Surface metrology: obtaining stereo pairs for 3D carrying out form removal reconstruction p. 4 p. 8 PLUS We look forward to seeing you at Stuttgart, Germany 16th Conference on Göteborg, Sweden May 9 - 12, 2017 Metrology & Properties of June 27-29, 2017 Engineering Surfaces STAND #3412 SPONSOR & EXHIBITOR 2 SURFACE METROLOGY IDENTIFYING AND RESOLVING THE PROBLEM OF SURFACE DEFECTS The appearance of defects on the surface of a part or Can international standards deal with this issue? workpiece presents difficulties for surface metrology at many different levels. Paul Rubert, reference Because of this, there is a demand for international standards expert, outlines the problem for Surface standards to deal with defect-definition for engineered Newsletter. surfaces that have to perform a certain function or job. As a result, metrologists are often under pressure to provide When dealing with surface defects, the following questions these standards. must be answered: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New 3D Parameters and Filtration Techniques for Surface Metrology, François Blateyron, Quality Magazine White Paper
    New 3D Parameters and Filtration Techniques for Surface Metrology François Blateyron, Director of R&D, Digital Surf, France For a long time surface metrology has been based upon contact measurement using 2D profilometers. Over the past twenty years the appearance of 3D profilometers and non-contact gauges has created a need for the standardization and formalization of the analysis of 3D surface texture. This paper presents the current status of the standardization process and includes a short description of the tools and parameters that will become available to users when work on the definition of the new standards, which is being carried out by working groups WG15 and WG16 of ISO technical committee TC213, has been completed. 1. Introduction meeting, and officially transferred to the TC213, in order to Since the first roughness meters appeared at the beginning start the standardization process. of the 1930s, the measurement of surface texture has always been based on 2D profilometry and contact gauges. 3. Towards a complete rework of all We had to wait until the beginning of the 1980s to see the surface texture standards appearance of instruments for measuring 3D surfaces, such In June 2002, the TC213 voted the creation of a new as white light interferometers and 3D profilometers working group [N499] and assigned it the task of [WHI94]. The first tools for analysing measurements developing future international standards for 3D surface generated by these instruments were developed by each texture. This group met for the first time in January 2003, in manufacturer, often extrapolating from existing tools for Cancun.
    [Show full text]
  • Calibration Procedure and Industrial Applications of Coherence Scanning Interferometer
    THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE ENGINEERING Calibration Procedure and Industrial Applications of Coherence Scanning Interferometer OLENA FLYS Department of Materials and Manufacturing Technology Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden 2016 Calibration Procedure and Industrial Applications of Coherence Scanning Interferometer OLENA FLYS © OLENA FLYS, 2016. Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Engineering ISSS 1652-8891 Report no. 107/2016 Published and distributed by: Department of Materials and Manufacturing Technology Chalmers University of Technology SE - 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden Printed in Sweden Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Calibration Procedure and Industrial Applications of Coherence Scanning Interferometer OLENA FLYS Department of Materials and Manufacturing Technology Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Countless industrial applications over the past decades have indicated the increased need to relate surface texture to surface function. Measurement and characterization of the areal nature of the surface allows the manufacturer to alter how the surface interacts with surroundings. Surface metrology covers the questions related to surface measurements, its analysis, representation, and interpretation. Despite the long experience of surface measurements there are still a lot of open questions. One of question was listed in this thesis is: “Is there a universal analysis technique available for understanding and interpreting the properties of surface topography?” The simple answer is: There is no universal analysis technique. However, for a better understanding and interpretation of the properties of a surface, a combination of different techniques can be necessary. The use of Power Spectral Density (PSD) analysis in this thesis showed to be a powerful analysis tool for identification of the differences and equalities between different instruments measuring similar topographies.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Lan, Xiangqi The Development of a Flexible Characterisation System for Surface Metrology Original Citation Lan, Xiangqi (2014) The Development of a Flexible Characterisation System for Surface Metrology. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/20332/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FLEXIBLE CHARACTERISATION SYSTEM FOR SURFACE METROLOGY Xiangqi Lan A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Computing and Engineering University of Huddersfield April 2014 Abstract Surface texture and its measurement are becoming more and more increasingly important in the field of high precision engineering and nano-technology. It is a significant and efficient way to predict the functional performance of an engineering product by characterising its surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Texture Measurement on Complex Geometry Using Dual-Scan Positioning Strategy
    applied sciences Article Surface Texture Measurement on Complex Geometry Using Dual-Scan Positioning Strategy Fang Cheng 1, Shaowei Fu 2,3,* and Ziran Chen 1 1 Engineering Research Center of Mechanical Testing Technology and Equipment (Ministry of Education), Chongqing Key Laboratory of Time Grating Sensing and Advanced Testing Technology, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China; [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (Z.C.) 2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore 3 JM VisTec System Pte Ltd., Singapore 417942, Singapore * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 November 2020; Accepted: 24 November 2020; Published: 26 November 2020 Featured Application: This work is potentially applicable to in-line surface measurement. Integrated with robots or other manipulation devices, the proposed technology will be able to capture surface finishing parameters, including roughness and surface texture uniformity. Abstract: In this paper, a surface measurement method based on dual-scan positioning strategy is presented to address the challenges of irregular surface patterns and complex geometries. A confocal sensor with an internal scanning mechanism was used in this study. By synchronizing the local scan, enabled by the internal actuator in the confocal sensor, and the global scans, enabled by external positioners, the developed system was able to perform noncontact line scan and area scan. Thus, this system was able to measure both surface roughness and surface uniformity. Unlike laboratory surface measurement equipment, the proposed system is reconfigurable for in situ measurement and able to scan free-form surfaces with a proper stand-off distance and approaching angle.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Material Surface Profiling Methods: Contact Versus Non-Contact
    Evaluation of Material Surface Profiling Methods: Contact versus Non-contact A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Brunel University London for the degree of Master of Philosophy by Supaporn Jaturunruangsri College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London December 2014 1 Abstract Accurate determination of surface texture is essential for the manufacturing of mechanical components within design specifications in engineering and materials science disciplines. It is also required for any subsequent modifications to physical properties and functional aspects of the object. A number of methods are available to characterize any surface through the measurement of roughness parameters that can then be used to describe surface texture. These methods may be divided into those in that direct contact is made with the surface and those where such contact is not required. This report describes two methods approach for the surface profiling of a quartz glass substrate for step height, and tungsten substrate for roughness measure. A stylus profilometer (contact method) and vertical scanning interferometer, (VSI) or (non-contact optical method) were used for step height and roughness parameter measurements. A comparison was made with nominal values assigned to the studied surface, and conclusions drawn about the relative merits of the two methods. Those merits were found to differ, depending on the parameters under consideration. The stylus method gave better agreement of step height values for dimensions greater than a micron. Both methods showed excellent accuracy at smaller dimensions. Both methods also provided accurate average roughness values, although the VSI data significantly overestimated 35% above the peak-to-valley parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Surface Roughness Measurement Methods for Gear
    19FTM21 AGMA Technical Paper A Comparison of Surface Roughness Measurement Methods for Gear Tooth Working Surfaces By Matthew Wagner, Aaron Isaacson, Applied Research Laboratory – Pennsylvania State University, Mark Michaud, Matt Bell, REM Surface Engineering A Comparison of Surface Roughness Measurement Methods for Gear Tooth Working Surfaces Matthew Wagner, Aaron Isaacson, Mark Michaud, and Matt Bell [The statements and opinions contained herein are those of the author and should not be construed as an official action or opinion of the American Gear Manufacturers Association.] Abstract Surface roughness is a critical parameter for gears operating under a variety of conditions. It directly influences friction and contact temperature, and therefore has an impact on various failure modes such as macropitting, micropitting and scuffing. Typically, gear tooth surface roughness is measured using a stylus profilometer, which yields a two dimensional cross section of the surface from which roughness parameters are taken. Stylus profilometry can produce inconsistent results if measurements are not executed correctly. Variables such as measurement parameters, stylus tip radius, and repeatability of stylus orientation relative to the gear tooth can all impact measurement results. This paper examines measurements from one “shop floor” and one “metrology lab” profilometer, both using two different stylus tip radii on the same gear teeth. Measurements from ground, shot peened and superfinished surfaces are compared. Although stylus profilometry is convenient, a limited amount of information regarding the surface topography of the tooth is retained. Tooth replicas subsequently evaluated with optical interferometry offer an alternative means to measure surface roughness, and allow for retention of a much more complete representation of the tooth surface for future evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness Measurements Obtained with the Use of Contact Stylus Profilometry and Coherence Scanning Interferometry
    XXI IMEKO World Congress “Measurement in Research and Industry” August 30 September 4, 2015, Prague, Czech Republic COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED WITH THE USE OF CONTACT STYLUS PROFILOMETRY AND COHERENCE SCANNING INTERFEROMETRY Stanisław Adamczak1 , Jacek Świderski1, Stępień Krzysztof1, Tomasz Dobrowolski1, Ireneusz Piotr Chmielik2 1 Kielce University of Technology, Kielce, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Taylor Hobson Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The paper presents comparison of measurements components of a measuring instrument and inaccurate of geometrical surface structure obtained by the contact positioning on a studied surface. stylus profilometer and an optical profilometer applying External disturbances can be of a low or high frequency. a coherence scanning interferometry method. The Low frequency disturbances are for example thermal measurements were performed on type D1 roughness etalon. disturbances. Thermal expansion of the components of the measuring instrument as well as a workpiece should be Keywords: surface texture measurement, contact stylus considered as a very important factor affecting measurement scanning, coherence scanning interferometry results. High frequency disturbances are usually the result of vibrations of mechanical units of a measuring instrument 1. INTRODUCTION and vibrations of the ground influencing measurement circuit of the instrument. The problem of measurements of surface texture is Contact profilometry is the most common method considered as a one of the most difficult in modern applied in measurements of surface texture. Contact metrology [1-5]. profilometers are equipped with a stylus, ended with a tip, The most important methods of measurements of surface whose moves depend on surface irregularities and, a topography are: contact stylus interferometry, phase shift transducer that converts the moves of the stylus into interferometry [6-9], coherence scanning interferometry, measuring signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Metrology and the National Science Foundation
    Surface Metrology and the National Science Foundation An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science by Maereg Tafesse Date: May 30, 2015 Report Submitted to: Professor Christopher Brown This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Objective ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Rationale ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. State-of-the-art ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Approach ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On Deterministic Feature-Based Surface Analysis
    THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE ENGINEERING On Deterministic Feature-based Surface Analysis VIJETH VENKATARAM REDDY Department of Industrial and Materials Science Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden 2020 On Deterministic Feature-based Surface Analysis VIJETH VENKATARAM REDDY © VIJETH VENKATARAM REDDY, 2020. Thesis for the degree of Licentiate of Engineering Report no. IMS-2020-5 Published and distributed by: Department of Industrial and Materials Science Chalmers University of Technology SE - 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden Printed in Sweden Chalmers digitaltryck Gothenburg, Sweden 2020 Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 On Deterministic feature-based Surface Analysis VIJETH VENKATARAM REDDY Department of Industrial and Materials Science Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Manufacturing sector is continuously identifying opportunities to streamline production, reduce waste and improve manufacturing efficiency without compromising product quality. Continuous improvement has been the primary objective to produce acceptable quality products and meet dynamic customer demands by using advanced techniques and methods. Considering the current demands from society on improving the efficiency with sustainable goals, there is considerable interest from researchers and industry to explore the potential, to optimize- and customize manufactured surfaces, as one way of improving the performance of products and processes. Every manufacturing process generate surfaces which beholds certain signature features. Engineered surfaces consist of both, features that are of interest and features that are irrelevant. These features imparted on the manufactured part vary depending on the process, materials, tooling and manufacturing process variables. Characterization and analysis of deterministic features represented by significant surface parameters helps the understanding of the process and its influence on surface functional properties such as wettability, fluid retention, friction, wear and aesthetic properties such as gloss, matte.
    [Show full text]