DOCSLIB.ORG

The Outing Pc: 416, Season 4, Episode 17 Broadcast Date: February 11, 1993 Written by Larry Charles Directed by Tom Cherones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Outing Pc: 416, Season 4, Episode 17 Broadcast Date: February 11, 1993 Written by Larry Charles Directed by Tom Cherones The Outing pc: 416, season 4, episode 17 Broadcast date: February 11, 1993 Written by Larry Charles Directed by Tom Cherones ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cast Regulars: Jerry Seinfeld ....................... Jerry Seinfeld Jason Alexander .................. George Costanza Julia Louis-Dreyfus ............. Elaine Benes Michael Richards ................. Kramer Guest Stars: Paula Marshall .................... Sharon Kari Coleman ..................... Allison Anthony Mangano ............ Sailor Ben Reed ........................... Male Nurse Lawrence A. Mandley ....... Manager Charley Garrett ................. Man #1 Deck McKenzie .................. Scott David Gibbs ....................... Man #2 rc: Liz Sheridan .................. Helen Seinfeld rc: Barney Martin .............. Morty Seinfeld rc: Estelle Harris ................ Estelle Costanza ================================================================== [Opening monologue] I don't know about you, but I'm getting sick of pretending to be excited every time it's somebody's birthday, you know what I mean? What is the big deal? How many times do we have to celebrate that someone was born? Every year, over and over... All you did was not die for twelve months. That's all you've done, as far as I can tell. Now those astrology things where they tell you all the people that have the same birthday as you? It's always an odd group of people too, isn't it? It's like Ed Asner, Elijah Muhammed and Secretariat. [The scene opens with George dropping off his date for the night. She obviously has had a wonderful evening] ALLISON: I don't want to *live*! I don't want to *live*! GEORGE: Because of me? You must be joking! Who wouldn't want to live because of me? I'm nothing! ALLISON: No... You're *something*. GEORGE: You can do better than me. You could throw a dart out the window and hit someone better than me. I'm no good! ALLISON: You're good. You're *good*! GEORGE: I'm bad. I'm *bad*! ALLISON: You're *killing* me! [We cut to Monk's where George, Jerry & Elaine are dining (it being a diner, and all). Jerry is over making a phone call while George & Elaine talk at the table.] GEORGE: So what could I do? I couldn't go through with it. She threatened to kill herself. ELAINE: Over you? GEORGE: Yes. Why, is that so inconceivable? (Cut to Jerry who is over at the phone trying to get Sharon Leanord at NYU. Elaine and George exchange thoughts on what they got Jerry for his birthday.) GEORGE: I got two tickets to see "Guys And Dolls". ELAINE: I got him a two-line phone. (Jerry returns to the booth and explains the phone call.) JERRY: Unbelievable! She's not there. GEORGE: What paper does she write for? JERRY: The works for the NYU school newspaper. She's a grad student in journalism. Never been to a comedy club. Never even seen me, has no idea who I am. ELAINE: Never even seen you? Gotta kinda envy that... JERRY: Y'know, you've been developing quite the acid-tongue lately... ELAINE: [Proudly] Really? (The camera pans out some so that we can see the three at their table and a girl sitting with her back to George at the next table. She starts to become interested in what the people behind her are talking about as Elaine pops the following philosophical dilemma to her companions) ELAINE: Hey, who do you think is the most unattractive world leader? JERRY: Living or all time? ELAINE: All time. JERRY: Well, if it's all time, then there's no contest. It begins and ends with Brezhnev. ELAINE: I dunno. You ever get a good look at DeGaulle? GEORGE: Lyndon Johnson was uglier than Degaulle. ELAINE: I got news for you. Golda Meir could make 'em all run up a tree. (Elaine notices the woman sitting behind George is eavesdropping on their conversation and discreetly alerts J+G. She decides to add some spice to the conversation. The makes sure to say it loud enough so that the spy at the next table is sure to hear... ) ELAINE: Y'know, just because you two are homosexuals, so what? I mean you should just come out of the closet and be openly gay already. (Jerry rolls his eyes and turns away in disbelief while George on the other hand addresses Jerry directly) GEORGE: So, whaddya say? You know you'll always be the only man I'll ever love. JERRY: [indignantly] What's the matter with you? GEORGE: [quietly] C'mon, go along... JERRY: I'm not goin' along. I can just see you in Berlin in 1939 goose- stepping past me: "C'mon Jerry, go along, go along..." JERRY: Y'know I hear that all the time. ELAINE: Hear what? JERRY: That I'm gay. People think I'm gay. ELAINE: Yeah, you know people ask me that about you, too. JERRY: Yeah, 'cuz I'm single, I'm thin and I'm neat. ELAINE: And you get along well with women. GEORGE: I guess that leaves me in the clear... (Meanwhile over at the phone booth, the eavesdropper reveals that she is one Sharon Leonard and she's calling the newspaper that she got to the diner late and missed out on meeting up with Jerry. As she's hanging up, George and Jerry make a trip to the bathroom (have two guys ever actually gone to the bathroom together? Hmmmm...) [Jerry's apartment] (Jerry's unpacking groceries (no cereal to be seen) and George comes in.) GEORGE: I just thought of a great name for myself, if I ever become a porno actor. JERRY: Oh yeah, what? "Buck Naked"? GEORGE: Yeah, how did you know that? JERRY: You told me that already like two months ago. GEORGE: Allison bought it for me. JERRY: How you gonna get out of *that* one? GEORGE: I dunno. I guess I have to wait for her to die. (Sharon buzzes and comes up to Jerry's apartment. George decides to stay. There's a knock at the door and when Jerry answers it, the two decide if they've ever met before. It's pretty obvious Sharon remembers Jerry and George as that "funny" couple from Monk's. Jerry hasn't placed her face, however. Sharon is introduced to George and) JERRY: He's gonna hang around if that's alright with you? SHARON: Sure, I'd like to talk to him, too. GEORGE: Jerry did you wash this pear? JERRY: Yeah, I washed it. GEORGE: It looks like it hasn't been washed. JERRY: So *wash* *it*. GEORGE: You hear the way he talks to me? SHARON: You should hear how *my* boyfriend talks to me... (Again, Jerry seems confused as to what Sharon is saying. Something's not quite right... But, before another question can be asked, again George has a question-- this time for Sharon) GEORGE: Let me ask you something. What do you think of this shirt? SHARON: It's nice. GEORGE: Jerry said he didn't like it. JERRY: I didn't say I didn't like it. I said it was O.K... GEORGE: No, you said you didn't like it... JERRY: Oh, so what if I don't like it. Is that like the end of the world, or something? SHARON: So how did you two meet? JERRY: Actually, we met in the gym locker room. GEORGE: Yeah. Actually it was in gym class. I was trying to climb the ropes and Jerry was spotting me. I kept slipping and burning my thighs and then finally I slipped and fell on Jerry's head. We've been close ever since. (George takes a hold of Jerry's leg to stress the point and Sharon, who obviously thinks she has a real story here now, asks another question:) SHARON: Do you guys live together? JERRY: [quizzically] Live together? GEORGE: No, I got my own place. (Jerry is about *this* close (picture my thumb and forefinger *really* close together) to figuring out what is going on here, when the "question fatale" is asked:) SHARON: And do your parents know? JERRY: Know *what*? GEORGE: My parents? They don't know *what's* goin' on... JERRY: Oh God, you're that girl in the coffee shop that was eavesdropping on us. I *knew* you looked familiar! (All three rise from the couch and a rather excited J+G try to explain things to a very confused reporter.) JERRY: There's been a big misunderstanding here! We did that whole thing for your benefit. We knew you were eavesdropping. That's why my friend said all that. It was on purpose! We're not gay! Not that there's anything wrong with that... GEORGE: No, of course not... JERRY: I mean that's fine if that's who you are... GEORGE: Absolutely... JERRY: I mean I have many gay friends... GEORGE: My *father* is gay... SHARON: Look, I know what I heard. JERRY: It was a *joke*... GEORGE: Look, you wanna have sex right now? Do want to have sex with me right now? Let's go! C'mon, let's go baby! C'mon! (Not that that approach was going to work, or anything, but what minute chance they had of convincing her is blown away as the door bursts open and:) KRAMER: Hey, C'mon! Let's go! I thought we were going to take a steam! GEORGE: No! JERRY: No steam! KRAMER: Well I don't want to sit there naked all by myself! [We fast forward a couple of hours and Jerry and Elaine are talking in the apartment. Elaine offers to talk to her and Jerry reveals that he has convinced her to "think about it" before she prints anything in the NYU paper.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender Representation on American Narrative Television from 2004-2014
    TRANSJACKING TELEVISION: TRANSGENDER REPRESENTATION ON AMERICAN NARRATIVE TELEVISION FROM 2004-2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Kelly K. Ryan May 2021 Examining Committee Members: Jan Fernback, Advisory Chair, Media and Communication Nancy Morris, Media and Communication Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Media and Communication Ron Becker, External Member, Miami University ABSTRACT This study considers the case of representation of transgender people and issues on American fictional television from 2004 to 2014, a period which represents a steady surge in transgender television characters relative to what came before, and prefigures a more recent burgeoning of transgender characters since 2014. The study thus positions the period of analysis as an historical period in the changing representation of transgender characters. A discourse analysis is employed that not only assesses the way that transgender characters have been represented, but contextualizes American fictional television depictions of transgender people within the broader sociopolitical landscape in which those depictions have emerged and which they likely inform. Television representations and the social milieu in which they are situated are considered as parallel, mutually informing discourses, including the ways in which those representations have been engaged discursively through reviews, news coverage and, in some cases, blogs. ii To Desmond, Oonagh and Eamonn For everything. And to my mother, Elaine Keisling, Who would have read the whole thing. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout the research and writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance, and therefore offer many thanks. To my Dissertation Chair, Jan Fernback, whose feedback on my writing and continued support and encouragement were invaluable to the completion of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom
    30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom Katrin Horn When the sitcom 30 Rock first aired in 2006 on NBC, the odds were against a renewal for a second season. Not only was it pitched against another new show with the same “behind the scenes”-idea, namely the drama series Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 30 Rock’s often absurd storylines, obscure references, quick- witted dialogues, and fast-paced punch lines furthermore did not make for easy consumption, and thus the show failed to attract a sizeable amount of viewers. While Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip did not become an instant success either, it still did comparatively well in the Nielson ratings and had the additional advantage of being a drama series produced by a household name, Aaron Sorkin1 of The West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006) fame, at a time when high-quality prime-time drama shows were dominating fan and critical debates about TV. Still, in a rather surprising programming decision NBC cancelled the drama series, renewed the comedy instead and later incorporated 30 Rock into its Thursday night line-up2 called “Comedy Night Done Right.”3 Here the show has been aired between other single-camera-comedy shows which, like 30 Rock, 1 | Aaron Sorkin has aEntwurf short cameo in “Plan B” (S5E18), in which he meets Liz Lemon as they both apply for the same writing job: Liz: Do I know you? Aaron: You know my work. Walk with me. I’m Aaron Sorkin. The West Wing, A Few Good Men, The Social Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Pell Scholars and Senior Theses Salve's Dissertations and Theses 5-2010 Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions Stephanie Savage Salve Regina University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, and the Marketing Commons Savage, Stephanie, "Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions" (2010). Pell Scholars and Senior Theses. 54. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Salve's Dissertations and Theses at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pell Scholars and Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Savage 1 “Who’s gonna turn down a Junior Mint? It’s chocolate, it’s peppermint ─it’s delicious!” While this may sound like your typical television commercial, you can thank Jerry Seinfeld and his butter fingers for what is actually one of the most renowned lines in television history. As part of a 1993 episode of Seinfeld , subsequently known as “The Junior Mint,” these infamous words have certainly gained a bit more attention than the show’s writers had originally bargained for. In fact, those of you who were annoyed by last year’s focus on a McDonald’s McFlurry on NBC’s 30 Rock may want to take up your beef with Seinfeld’s producers for supposedly showing marketers the way to the future ("Brand Practice: Product Integration Is as Old as Hollywood Itself").
    [Show full text]
  • Which Seinfeld Character Are You?
    EPISODE 181: THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MEETING WHICHWHICH SEINFELDSEINFELD CHARACTERCHARACTER AREARE YOU?YOU? In our business dealings, we are often guilty of just not listening. We come to the table with an agenda—a new product, a new service—and wait while a prospect or existing client tells us what’s going on with his or her business. At some point, that person will pause—and we pounce with our spiel. This approach rarely works - successful business development requires some level of rapport and relationship building. As in all aspects of life, this can mean dealing with those who may not share your views or approach. In order to adapt quickly and improvise in these instances, it’s helpful to understand people’s communication and personality styles. There are a number of tests that can help us understand the personality and communication styles of others, including the popular DISC model. This model has four quadrants: dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness. Influence and steadiness are on the right side of the brain, and dominance and conscientiousness are on the left side. Understanding someone’s dominant quadrant can help you find a way to work more effectively with them. UNDERSTANDING WHAT SEINFELD YOUR SITCOM CAST Now that you understand where you fall QUADRANT ARE YOU? within the quadrants, you can begin to think about how to work and respond to any cast of characters you may come I’ll let you in on an interesting tidbit, successful sitcoms often across. Friction will naturally arise include a character from each of the following quadrants, because these are people with opposite because the resulting friction tends to be funny.
    [Show full text]
  • “You're the Worst Gay Husband Ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay
    Title P “You’re the Worst Gay Husband ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay Sitcom Representation A thesis presented by Alex Assaf To The Department of Communications Studies at the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honors) April 2012 Advisors: Prof. Shazia Iftkhar Prof. Nicholas Valentino ii Copyright ©Alex Assaf 2012 All Rights Reserved iii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my Nana who has always motivated me to pursue my interests, and has served as one of the most inspirational figures in my life both personally and academically. iv Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to thank my incredible advisors Professor Shazia Iftkhar and Professor Nicholas Valentino for reading numerous drafts and keeping me on track (or better yet avoiding a nervous breakdown) over the past eight months. Additionally, I’d like to thank my parents and my friends for putting up with my incessant mentioning of how much work I always had to do when writing this thesis. Their patience and understanding was tremendous and helped motivate me to continue on at times when I felt uninspired. And lastly, I’d like to thank my brother for always calling me back whenever I needed help eloquently naming all the concepts and patterns that I could only describe in my head. Having a trusted ally to bounce ideas off and to help better express my observations was invaluable. Thanks, bro! v Abstract This research analyzes the implicit and explicit messages viewers receive about the LGBT community in primetime sitcoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Date Production Name Venue / Production Designer / Stylist Design
    Date ProductionVenue Name / Production Designer / Stylist Design Talent 2015 Opera Komachi atOpera Sekidrera America Camilla Huey Designer 3 dresses, 3 wigs 2014 Opera Concert Alice Tully Hall Opera Camilla Huey Designer 1 Gown Rebecca Ringle 2014 Opera Concert Carnegie Hall Opera Camilla Huey Designer 1 Gown Rebecca Ringle 2014 Opera Concert Carnegie Hall Opera Camilla Huey Designer 1 Gown Sara Jakubiak 2013 Opera Concert Bard University Opera Camilla Huey Designer 1 Gown Rebecca Ringle 1996 Opera Carmen Metropolitan Opera Leather Costumes 1996 Opera Midsummer'sMetropolitan Night's Dream Opera Leslie Weston / Izquierdo Human Pillar Set Piece 1997 Opera Samson & MetropolitanDelilah Opera Leslie Weston / Izquierdo Dyeing Costumes 1997 Opera Cerentola Metropolitan Opera Leslie Weston / Izquierdo Mechanical Wings 1997 Opera Madame ButterflyHouston Grand Opera Anita Yavich / Izquierdo Kimonos Hand Painted 1997 Opera Lillith Tisch Center for the Arts OperaCatherine Heraty / Izquierdo Costumes 1996 Opera Bartered BrideMetropolitan Opera Sylvia Nolan / Izquierdo Dancing Couple + Muscle Shirt 1996 Opera Four SaintsMetropolitan In Three Acts Opera Francesco Clemente/ Izquierdo FC Asssitant 1996 Opera Atilla New York City Opera Hal George / Izquierdo Refurbishment 1995 Opera Four SaintsHouston In Three Grand Acts Opera Francesco Clemente / Izquierdo FC Assistant 1994 Opera Requiem VariationsOpera Omaha Izquierdo 1994 Opera Countess MaritzaSanta Fe Opera Allison Chitty / Izquierdo 1994 Opera Street SceneHouston Grand Opera Francesca Zambello/ Izquierdo
    [Show full text]
  • Your Local Independent Bookstore Delivers Holiday Joy Everywhere
    IN STORE, ONLINE, CURBSIDE, AND RIGHT TO YOUR DOOR, your local independent bookstore delivers holiday joy everywhere. Winners Just Announced Booksellers from your favorite bookstores throughout the Greater Midwest selected these titles as award-winning books from the region this year. Celebrate these authors by shopping for their books at your local independent bookstore. FICTION NONFICTION POETRY Everywhere You In the Dream House Homie Don’t Belong Carmen Maria Machado Danez Smith Gabriel Bump Graywolf Press Graywolf Press Algonquin Books $16.00 | 9781644450031 $16.00 | 9781644450109 $25.95 | 9781616208790 YA / MIDDLE GRADE PICTURE BOOK The Fountains of Silence A Map into the World Ruta Sepetys Kao Kalia Yang Philomel Books Carolrhoda Books $11.99 | 9780399160318 $17.99 | 9781541538368 See all finalists for the Heartland Booksellers Award at heartlandfallforum.org/heartland-booksellers-award.html 3 Fiction Good Reads Sapiens: A Graphic History Snow African American Poetry: Make Life Beautiful Yuval Noah Harari John Banville 250 Years of Struggle & Syd & Shea McGee The graphic adaptation of the The incomparable Booker Prize Song Meet Syd and Shea #1 New York Times bestseller winner’s next great crime novel: Kevin Young, Editor McGee, the powerhouse couple by Yuval Noah Harari, now with a beautifully crafted and darkly A literary landmark: the behind Studio McGee, the gorgeous color illustrations and evocative story of an aristocratic biggest, most inclusive fastest-growing interior design digestible text for readers of family whose secrets resurface anthology of Black poetry ever studio in the U.S. Learn how all ages. when a parish priest is found published, gathering nearly 250 classic design principles can be Harper Paperbacks murdered.
    [Show full text]
  • • • Alberta • • Medical Bulletin
    • • • • • • Alberta • • Medical Bulletin October, 1950 CAN"ADIA~ :\fEDICIAL ASSOCIATION Alberta Division - ·--=== PUBLISHED QUARTERLY For Your ...,;;... f inickq Patients )3j/;~~ Prescribe ~ Pleasant Tasting Riki toI EMULSION n~1,· I r ,, . f) ~,,l AN AQUEOUS f"""llm~..... nlnita. ~mu1s1an r'rOVluBS CONTAINING Greater Absorption Better Storage CLINICAL EVIDENCE J. M. Lewis and co-worken<1) gave eight prema­ ture infants 35,000 units of Vitamin A, flnt as an oil solution and later the same dosage as a water emulsion. They found the average rise In Vitamin A concentration In the blood of these Infants to AYAILABIUTY: be 62 units and 274 units after the oll and the Rlkltol Emulsion E.8.S. Is water emulsion respectfyely. packaged In .. cc., 15 cc., Sobel et al (2) compared the amounts of the and 30 cc. dropper bottles. vitamins stored In the llver of rats after It had It is given by stirring one been given In oll to one group of animals and In or more drops Into milk, aqueous emulsion to another group. They used orange luice, cocoa or Vitamin A from three different sources. The results other beverage. It Is highly of their experiments showed an average of flavoured so that upon 16096 better storage when the aqueous emu&. dilution, it has Cl pleasant lion was used. fruity tan. (1) ~,., llodandry, llnnl....... and Cohi.i. J. realatdcs 31, "'6 (194) (2) Sobel, E. A. et al, J. Nutrition 35, 225 (1NI) Write for Sample and Uferafure LEWORTH CHElfCAL CO. LTD., TIRORTO, CAllADA The Alberta Medical Bulletin Published by The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta 501 Alexandra Block EDMONTON, ALBERTA Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • \\Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects\1998\05-98 2 Seinfeld
    FOR RELEASE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUNDAY, MAY 10, 1998, 4:00 P.M. (BROADCAST) Kimberly Parker or Greg Flemming MONDAY, MAY 11, 1998, A.M. (PRINT) Fans Say Yada Yada MIXED REACTION TO POST-SEINFELD ERA The situation comedy “Seinfeld” may be the most popular television show of its time, but only half of the people who watch it say they’ll miss it when it’s gone. And even fewer want friends like Jerry, George, Elaine and Kramer. The Seinfeld Audience... Young, Affluent and Single Today, 62% of the public says they watch the Ever Watch? program, and, at least for now, “Seinfeld” tops the list of Yes No all-time favorite comedy programs. In a new Pew Research Total 62 38=100 Center survey, 14% of Americans name the show as their Male 66 34 favorite. M*A*S*H ranks second with 6%. Female 58 42 18-29 81 19 The tearful farewells fans gave other popular 30-49 65 35 sitcoms, however, are unlikely to follow the “Seinfeld” 50-64 56 44 finale: 51% of viewers say they won’t miss the show much. 65+ 34 66 Only 19% of “Seinfeld” viewers say they will miss the College Grad. 70 30 show a great deal, another 29% will miss it a fair amount. Some College 66 34 H.S. Grad 62 38 Just as the sitcom’s trademark indifference is < H.S. 46 54 mirrored in these findings, “Seinfeld” viewers reflect the $75,000+ 71 29 characters: Fans are young, affluent and single. Fully 81% $50,000-74,999 74 26 of those under age 30 watch the show compared to just 34% $30,000-49,999 66 34 $20,000-29,999 55 45 of those over 65; 71% of those earning more than $75,000 < $20,000 52 48 tune in compared to 52% of those with incomes under $20,000; and 71% of single people watch the show versus Single 71 29 Married 59 41 59% of married folks.
    [Show full text]
  • GSC Films: S-Z
    GSC Films: S-Z Saboteur 1942 Alfred Hitchcock 3.0 Robert Cummings, Patricia Lane as not so charismatic love interest, Otto Kruger as rather dull villain (although something of prefigure of James Mason’s very suave villain in ‘NNW’), Norman Lloyd who makes impression as rather melancholy saboteur, especially when he is hanging by his sleeve in Statue of Liberty sequence. One of lesser Hitchcock products, done on loan out from Selznick for Universal. Suffers from lackluster cast (Cummings does not have acting weight to make us care for his character or to make us believe that he is going to all that trouble to find the real saboteur), and an often inconsistent story line that provides opportunity for interesting set pieces – the circus freaks, the high society fund-raising dance; and of course the final famous Statue of Liberty sequence (vertigo impression with the two characters perched high on the finger of the statue, the suspense generated by the slow tearing of the sleeve seam, and the scary fall when the sleeve tears off – Lloyd rotating slowly and screaming as he recedes from Cummings’ view). Many scenes are obviously done on the cheap – anything with the trucks, the home of Kruger, riding a taxi through New York. Some of the scenes are very flat – the kindly blind hermit (riff on the hermit in ‘Frankenstein?’), Kruger’s affection for his grandchild around the swimming pool in his Highway 395 ranch home, the meeting with the bad guys in the Soda City scene next to Hoover Dam. The encounter with the circus freaks (Siamese twins who don’t get along, the bearded lady whose beard is in curlers, the militaristic midget who wants to turn the couple in, etc.) is amusing and piquant (perhaps the scene was written by Dorothy Parker?), but it doesn’t seem to relate to anything.
    [Show full text]
  • SEINFELD Revision #1 (Pink) 34. “The Contest” Oct 26 1992 (2/P)
    SEINFELD Revision #1 (pink) 34. “The Contest” Oct 26 1992 (2/P) (Jerry, George, Elaine) ACT TWO SCENE P INT. COFFEE SHOP - DAY (3) JERRY AND GEORGE JERRY So the nurse gave her a sponge bath? GEORGE Yeah. Everynight at 6:30. The nurse is gorgeous. Then I got a glimpse of the patient. I was going nuts. JERRY So, I guess you’ll be back in that hospital. GEORGE Well, my mother... JERRY But you’re still master of your domain. SEINFELD Revision #1 (pink) 35. “The Contest” Oct 26 1992 (2/P) GEORGE I’m king of the county. What about you? JERRY Lord of the manor. ELAINE ENTERS, SITS. ELAINE ...John F. Kennedy Jr. JERRY What? ELAINE He was in the aerobics class. He was exercising in front of me. JERRY Really? Did you talk to him? ELAINE You don’t understand. He worked out in front of me. When the class was over I timed my walk to the door so we’d get there at the same moment. So he says to me, “Quite a workout.” GEORGE “Quite a workout?” What did you say? ELAINE I said, “yeah.” SEINFELD Revision #1 (pink) 36. “The Contest” Oct 26 1992 (2/P) JERRY Good one. ELAINE Then I showered and dressed and I saw him again on the way out. So he holds the door open for me and he says, “Which way are you walking?” and I said, “Which way are you walking?” And he said, “That way.” And I said, “Well, isn’t that a coincidence?” Of course I was going in the opposite direction..
    [Show full text]