DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 80780- ZR PROJECT PAPER ON A PROPOSED ADDITIONAL IDA GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 2.0 MILLION (US$3.0 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized AND A PROPOSED GRANT FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$11.64 MILLION TO THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE NATIONAL PARKS NETWORK REHABILITATION PROJECT November 14, 2013 Environment, Natural Resources, Water and Disaster Risk Management Unit Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective August 15, 2013) Currency Unit = US$ CDF 993 = US$1 US$0.001 = CDF 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APN African Parks Network CDF Congolese franc CQS Selection based on Consultants’ Qualifications CTF Conservation trust fund DRC Democratic Republic of Congo ESIA Environmental and social impact assessment ESMP Environmental and social management plan EU European Union FCPF Forest Carbon Partnership Facility FZS Frankfurt Zoological Society GDP Gross domestic product GEF Global Environment Facility GEO Global Environmental Objective GIS Geographic information system GIZ German Agency for International Cooperation (Gesellschaft für technische Zusammenarbeit) IC Individual Consultant ICB International Competitive Bidding ICCN Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature) IPDP Indigenous Peoples Development Plan IDA International Development Association LCS Least Cost Selection MECNT Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Tourism (Ministère de l’Environnement, Conservation de la Nature et Tourisme) METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool N/A Not applicable NCB National Competitive Bidding ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework PA Protected area PAR Support project for ICCN reform (Projet d’appui à la réforme de l’ICCN) PARAP Support Program for the Protected Area Network (Programme d’Appui au Réseau des Aires Protégées – PARAP) PDO Project Development Objective PF Process Framework ii PIM Project Implementation Manual PMU Project Management Unit PP Procurement Plan PREPAN National Parks Network Rehabilitation Project (Projet de Réhabilitation du Réseau des Parcs nationaux) PSC Project Steering Committee QBS Quality Based Selection QCBS Quality and Cost Based Selection REDD+ Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation RPF Resettlement Policy Framework SDR Special Drawing Right TBD To be determined UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization USAID United States Agency for International Development WCS Wildlife Conservation Society WWF Worldwide Fund for Nature Vice President: Makhtar Diop Country Director: Eustache Ouayoro Sector Director: Jamal Saghir Sector Manager: Benoît Bosquet Task Team Leader: Douglas J. Graham iii Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background and Rationale for Additional Financing in the amount of US$14.64 million ...... 2 Country Context and Sector Issues ............................................................................................. 2 Description and Performance of the Original Project ................................................................. 4 Rationale for Additional Financing ............................................................................................ 5 III. Proposed Changes ..................................................................................................................... 5 Costs by component .................................................................................................................... 6 Expected outcomes ................................................................................................................... 10 Implementation Arrangements.................................................................................................. 10 IV. Appraisal Summary ................................................................................................................ 10 ANNEX 1: RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING .............................................. 12 Revised Project Results Framework ..................................................................................... 14 ANNEX 2: OPERATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK (ORAF) ..................... 17 ANNEX 3: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF MODIFIED OR NEW PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Component 1: Support to Institutional Rehabilitation. ............................................................. 20 Component 2: Support to National Parks ................................................................................. 23 Component 3: Technical Studies and Consultations ................................................................ 26 Component 4: Okapi Fund Establishment, Operation and Capitalization ................................ 27 ANNEX 4: REVISED IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS AND SUPPORT ............ 33 ANNEX 5: INCREMENTAL COST ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .............. 38 iv DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO NATIONAL PARKS NETWORK REHABILITATION PROJECT ADDITIONAL FINANCING DATA SHEET Basic Information - Additional Financing (AF) Country Director: Eustache Ouayoro Sectors: Public administration: Sector Manager/Director: Benoît agriculture, fishing and forestry (100%) Bosquet/Jamal Saghir Themes: Biodiversity Team Leader: Douglas J. Graham Environmental category: A Project ID: P127437 (GEF AF) & Expected Closing Date: Dec. 31, 2018 P148199 (IDA AF) Joint IFC: No Expected Effectiveness Date: Feb. 1, Joint Level: 2014 Lending Instrument: IPF Additional Financing Type: Scaling- up and New Activities Basic Information - Original Project Project ID: P083813 Environmental category: A Project Name: National Parks Network Current Closing Date: Jan. 31, 2014 (to Rehabilitation Project be extended to Dec. 31, 2018) Joint Level: Joint IFC: No Lending Instrument: SIL Fragility or Capacity Constraints [X] Financial Intermediary [ ] Series of Projects [ ] AF Project Financing Data [ ] Loan [ ] Credit [X] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ X] Other: GEF Grant Proposed terms: AF Financing Plan (US$m) Source Total Amount (US$m) Total Project Cost: 60.141 Cofinancing (KfW): 45.502 Borrower: Total Bank Financing: GEF 11.64 IDA SDR2.0 m (US$3.0 m Equivalent) 1 This amount does not include in-kind co-financing from the Government. 2 The amount of KfW cofinancing includes US$19.2 million direct contributions to Component 4, as well as other German cooperation support to DRC protected area system through parallel projects. v Client Information Recipient: Democratic Republic of Congo Responsible Agency: ICCN Contact Person: Cosma Wilungula Balongelwa (Director) Email: [email protected] AF Estimated Disbursements (Bank FY/US$m) FY 14 15 16 17 18 Annual 0.2 9.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 Cumulative 0.2 9.2 11.0 12.8 14.6 Project Development Objective and Description Original project development objective (PDO): To enhance the capacity of the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) for management of targeted protected areas. Revised project development objective: PDO has not been revised. The Global Environmental Objective (GEO) is the same as the PDO. Project description: Only new component is Component 4 for the creation and capitalization of the Okapi Fund, a conservation trust fund. Safeguard and Exception to Policies Safeguard policies triggered: Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) [X]Yes [ ] No Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) [X]Yes [ ] No Forests (OP/BP 4.36) [X]Yes [ ] No Pest Management (OP 4.09) [ ]Yes [X] No Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) [X]Yes [ ] No Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) [X]Yes [ ] No Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) [X]Yes [ ] No Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) [ ]Yes [X] No Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) [ ]Yes [X] No Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60) [ ]Yes [X] No Is approval of any policy waiver sought from the Board (or [ ]Yes [X] No MD if RETF operation is RVP approved)? Has this been endorsed by Bank Management? (Only applies [ ]Yes [ ] No to Board approved operations) Does the project require any exception to Bank policy? [ ]Yes [X] No Has this been approved by Bank Management? [ ]Yes [ ] No vi Conditions and Legal Covenants: Legal Agreement Reference Description of Date Due Condition/Covenant 5.01 (a) Effectiveness condition: The 90 days after signing. execution and delivery of the GEF Grant Agreement on behalf of the Recipient and the GEF Project Agreement on behalf of the Project Implementing Entity have been duly authorized or ratified by all necessary governmental and corporate action. 5.01 (c) Effectiveness condition: The 90 days after signing. Subsidiary Agreement referred to in Section [I.A] of Schedule 2 to the GEF Grant Agreement has been executed on behalf of the Recipient and the Project Implementing Entity. 5.01 (d) Effectiveness condition: the 90 days after signing. Co-financing Agreement dated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo Conservation Assessment
    Bonobo Conservation Assessment November 21-22, 1999 Kyoto University Primate Research Institute Inuyama, Japan Workshop Report Sally Coxe, Norm Rosen, Philip Miller and Ulysses Seal, editors A Contribution of the Workshop Participants and The Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (IUCN / SSC) A contribution of the workshop participants and the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Cover photo ©Frans Lanting Section divider photos: Sections I, V courtesy of Sally Coxe Sections II – IV, VI ©Frans Lanting Coxe, S., N. Rosen, P.S. Miller, and U.S. Seal. 2000. Bonobo Conservation Assessment Workshop Final Report. Apple Valley, MN: Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN). Additional copies of the publication can be ordered through the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124 USA. Fax: 612-432-2757. Send checks for US$35 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US bank. The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible $50,000 and above Gladys Porter Zoo Ouwehands Dierenpark Hong Kong Zoological and Riverbanks Zoological Park Chicago Zoological Society Botanical Gardens Wellington Zoo -Chairman Sponsor Japanese Association of Zoological Wildlife World Zoo SeaWorld/Busch Gardens Gardens and Aquariums (JAZA) Zoo de Granby Kansas City Zoo Zoo de la Palmyre $20,000 and above Laurie Bingaman Lackey Evenson Design Group Los Angeles Zoo $250 and above Minnesota Zoological Garden Madrid Zoo-Parques
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Democratic Republic of Congo, September 29 – October 21, 2006
    Mission to Democratic Republic of Congo, September 29 – October 21, 2006 Trip Report for International Programs, USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Version: 21 May 2007 Bruce G. Marcot, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 S.W. Main St., Suite 400, Portland, Oregon 97205, 503-808-2010, [email protected] John G. Sidle, USDA Forest Service 125 N. Main St., Chadron, Nebraska 69337, 308-432-0300, [email protected] CONTENTS 1 Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2 Introduction and Setting ………………………………………………………….…………… 3 3 Terms of Reference ……………………….…………………...……………………………… 4 4 Team Members and Contacts ………………………………………………….……………… 4 5 Team Schedule and Itinerary …………………………………………..….………...………… 4 6 Main Findings ................................…………………………………………….……....……… 5 7 Discussion and Recommendations ........………………………...…….......................….……... 10 8 Acknowledgments...…………………………………………………………………..….……. 15 Appendices 1. Terms of reference ..…………………………...…………………...………...………. 16 2. Team members and contacts made ..…………………………………...…......……… 19 3. Observations on biodiversity at Salonga National Park and environs ........................... 22 4. Forest Service presentation on planning at Kinshasa workshop ................................... 27 5. Suggested glossary terms for Salonga National Park Management Plan ...................... 31 6. Interviews with various personnel and local officials ................................................... 32 Disclaimer of brand names and Web links The use of trade, firm,
    [Show full text]
  • Background Between July 2Nd and September 5Th Simon Lewis and Me (Wannes Hubau) Did a Second Census on 9 Primary Forest Plots Located in Salonga National Park, DRC
    Background Between July 2nd and September 5th Simon Lewis and me (Wannes Hubau) did a second census on 9 primary forest plots located in Salonga National Park, DRC. This mission was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant ‘Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System’ (T-FORCES) at Leeds University, UK. For those who have heard of “The Salonga”, the park often has a mythical status. It is located in the deep heart of the dark forests of the Congo Basin, it is very hard to access and it contains a number of near-mythical creatures such as the African slender-snouted crocodile, the forest elephant, the bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee) and the Congo peafowl. The latter two are endemic in the Congo Basin. Salonga National Park (1°00'-3°20'S, 20°-22°30'E) is the world’s second largest tropical rainforest national park. It was already proposed as the Tshuapa National Park in 1956 by the Belgians and it gained its present boundaries with a 1970 decree by President Mobutu Sese Seko. The park was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1984 and added to the List of World Heritage in Danger in 1999. The park has been cleared of any human presence. There are no settlements and no roads. The last remaining residents of the park, the Iyaelima, are under pressure to leave the park by the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). Most of the park is located in the vast Equateur Province of DRC, on roughly 600 km from the capital Mbandaka.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Conservation Strategy 2012–2022 About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature- based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 8,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc IUCN Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Bonobos and Other Large Mammals in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo
    Oryx Vol 34 No 3 July 2000 A survey of bonobos and other large mammals in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo Ellen Van Krunkelsven, Inogwabini Bila-lsia and Dirk Draulans Abstract In December 1997 and January 1998 we trav- indicate that key forest species, including bonobo, bongo elled to the northern section of the Salonga National Park Tragelaphus euryceros, black mangabey Lophocebus alter- in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The park is the imus and leopard Panthera pardus, are present in reason- largest African rain forest reserve, and was created in able numbers in the part of the park we explored. Bonobo 1970 to protect endemic species such as the bonobo Pan density was calculated at 1.15 animals per sq km, based paniscus and the Congo peacock Afropavo congensis. on nest counts. Some elephants Loxodonta africana sur- However, hardly any data exist on the status of animals vive, despite the enormous hunting pressure. Conserva- in the park. In order to collect basic information, we set tion measures to protect the animals need to be taken up camp at four sites along two rivers, where we urgently. followed long trails deep into the forest. A total of 7.5 km line transects were cut from three sites, along which all Keywords Bonobos, Democratic Republic of Congo, evidence of large mammals was recorded. Our data mammals, Salonga National Park, threats. amuses Hippopotamus amphibius (Bavela Vuadi, 1987; Introduction D'Huart, 1988; East, 1990). This situation still prevailed In 1956, King Leopold III of Belgium sailed on the in 1996, when security problems prevented parrot re- Salonga River east from the village of Watsi Kengo, and searchers from sailing the Salonga (Fotso, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Monte Alén-Monts De Cristal Landscape
    12. Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Figure 12.1. Map of Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape (Sources: CARPE, JRC, SRTM, WCS-Gabon). Location and area he Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Tcovers the south and southeast of Equatorial Guinea and the northwest of Gabon (Figure 12.1). Coordinates: 1°53’35’’N – 0°5’38’’N; 9°37’2’’E – 11°36’3’’E It has an area of approximately 26,747 km2, of Area: 26,747 km2 which about half is located in Equatorial Guinea Elevation: 300-1,250 m and half in Gabon. In Equatorial Guinea, it in- Terrestrial ecoregion: Atlantic Congolese forests ecoregion cludes the Monte Alén and Altos de Nsork na- Aquatic ecoregions: Central West equatorial coastal ecoregion tional parks, as well as the Rio Muni Estuary Southwest equatorial coastal ecoregion Reserve and the Piedra Nzas Natural Monument. Protected areas: In Gabon, it comprises the two sections of Monts Monte Alén National Park, 200,000 ha, 1988/2000, Equatorial Guinea de Cristal National Park. Altos de Nsork National Park, 40,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Monts de Cristal National Park, 120,000 ha, 2002, Gabon Physical environment Rio Muni Estuary Reserve, 70,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Piedra Nzas Natural Monument, 19,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Relief and altitude Th e Landscape occupies a rugged area of pla- teaus and mountain chains mainly situated at an altitude of 300 m to 650 m to the northeast of the coastal sedimentary basin of Gabon (Figure 12.2). In Equatorial Guinea, the highest peak is formed by Monte Mitra, which rises to 1,250 m and is 114 the culminating point of the Niefang chain which runs from the southwest to the northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Surveillance
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation Africa Regional Program FY 2017 Summary of Projects In FY 2017, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) awarded funding to 25 projects totaling $15,170,086 through the Africa Regional Program, which was matched by $13,717,937 in additional leveraged funds. Unless otherwise noted, all projects were funded through the Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE). Field projects in eight countries (in alphabetical order below) and several regional projects in multiple countries were supported. Modifications to Existing Cooperative Agreeements and Grants CAMEROON AFR1413 Grant # F14AP00533 Scholarships, technical, and institutional capacity building at Garoua Wildlife College, Cameroon, Phase II. In partnership with Ecole de Faune de Garoua (Garoua Wildlife College). This modification supports the fourth year of this five-year cooperative agreement. Activities include: (1) scholarships for selected staff of Central African national parks and non- governmental organizations to earn diplomas in wildlife management at Garoua Wildlife College; and (2) support for Garoua Wildlife College faculty to improve their understanding and practice of the implementation of the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and to incorporate emerging threats to wildlife into the College’s curriculum. USFWS: $168,6601 Leveraged Funds: $36,500 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO (DRC) AFR0195 Grant # F13AP00859 Building a self-sustaining
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Bonobo (Pan Paniscus) Occurrence in Relation To
    MODELING BONOBO (PAN PANISCUS) OCCURRENCE IN RELATION TO BUSHMEAT HUNTING, SLASH-AND-BURN AGRICULTURE, AND TIMBER HARVEST: HARMONIZING BONOBO CONSERVATION WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT by JENA RENEE HICKEY (Under the Direction of NATHAN P. NIBBELINK and JOHN P. CARROLL) ABSTRACT Bushmeat hunting is anticipated to directly influence the distribution of bonobos through mortality of individuals and/or indirectly via bonobo avoidance of areas with higher hunting activity. Fragmentation of lowland rainforest is expected to facilitate hunter access to potential bonobo habitat, thereby reducing bonobo occurrence and reducing the effective habitat afforded by fragmented forests. We calculated four bonobo-specific fragmentation metrics based on remotely sensed data and fit univariate logistic regression models relating each metric to bonobo nest occurrence data collected in 2009. We found strong correlation between all fragmentation metrics and bonobo nest occurrence, with nests less likely to occur as fragmentation increased. We ranked the metrics based on predictive accuracy, with forest edge density (ED) ranking the highest. Using a maximum entropy modeling approach and 10 years of collaboratively compiled bonobo nest data, we built the first spatially explicit multivariate model predicting the rangewide distribution of bonobos. Of the rangewide environmental variables tested, the most important were distance from agriculture, distance from roads, ED, percent forest, and distance from river. Except percent forest, we view these predictors as proxies of hunting impact. Areas closer to agriculture are closer to human populations who tend to hunt in the surrounding forest. Roads and navigable rivers provide human access to areas that would otherwise likely be less vulnerable to hunting. ED distills the information of forest fragmentation from agriculture, logging, major rivers, and roads into a single metric that relates to hunter accessibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: Survey and Conservation Issues
    Oryx Vol 39 No 1 January 2005 Short Communication Fishes of the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: survey and conservation issues Bila-Isia Inogwabini Abstract Data were collected on the species richness Park have yet to be documented, but it is likely that these and abundance of fishes at two sites in the Salonga fishing techniques are having negative effects on the National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. Thirty fish fauna and urgent action is required to curb such species were identified out of a total of 1,180 fish caught. activities, at least within the Park. Claria buthupogon and Synodontis nigriventris (respec- tively 4.7 and 3.5 catches per net-night) were the most Keywords Abundance index, Democratic Republic of abundant species. Twenty-six other fish species were Congo, fish, fishing practices, species richness, Salonga reported from interviews with local people. Conserva- National Park. tion concerns are the burning of breeding sites, use of chemicals for fishing, and the newly introduced practice This paper contains supplementary material that can of dynamite fishing. The effects of these practices in the only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org Fish are the most abundant class of vertebrates but are collection of fish that take refuge in muddy areas beneath the least known (Groombridge, 1992), and freshwater these plants (Corsi, 1984; Inogwabini; et al., 2000; pers. habitats are subjected to unprecedented levels of human obs.). All these practices are used in the Park without any disturbance (Saunders et al., 2002). Fish are a major food prior evaluation having been conducted to ensure that resource and an important economic asset in the central harvesting of fish is sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Forests of the Congo Basin Overview
    1. Forests of the Congo Basin Overview ollowing the Amazonian forests, the forests of Fthe Congo Basin constitute the second larg- est area of dense tropical rainforest in the world. Th ey stretch from the coast of the Gulf of Guinea in the west to the mountains of the Albertine Rift in the east1 and cover about seven degrees of latitude on either side of the equator. Th ey are mostly within the Guinea-Congo forest structure, of which they constitute over 80% of the total area. In the west of Cameroon and the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo, they also include the Afromontane forests. Th is report focuses on the forests of the countries forming part of the CBFP partnership - Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, the Figure 1.3. Precipitation Central African Republic (CAR), the Republic of Africa are located between 300 and 1000 m of al- in Cenral Africa Congo and the Democratic Republic of Congo titude (Figure 1.2). Only the forests in the coastal (Sources : ESRI, (DRC). Th e area of these forests nears 200 mil- sedimentary basin, which represent 7% of the to- Worldclim data, lion hectares (Figure 1.1); however estimates of tal area of the forests and are located mainly in University of California, their area vary considerably. Certain estimates are Cameroon and Gabon, are at a height of less than Berkeley, USA). at the least surprising2, but even the weakest esti- 300m (page 82). mates vary depending on what one considers to Th e submontane forests, at an altitude of be forests.
    [Show full text]