DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Outline CENTRAL AFRICA REGIONAL OPERATING UNIT (CAROU) Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE) Salonga Semi-Annual Report Reporting Period: October 01, 2017 to March 31, 2018 Submission Date: April 30, 2018 Agreement Number: Cooperative Agreement #AID-660-A-13-00006 Activity Start Date and End Date: October 01, 2013 to September 30, 2018 AOR Name: Antoine Justin Eyebe Submitted by: Cary S. Farley, Chief of Party World Wildlife Fund 14, Avenue Sergent Moke Commune de Ngaliema Kinshasa Democratic Republic of the Congo Tel: +243 978 904 488 Email: [email protected] July 2008 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS AASD Action d’Aide Sanitaire et de Developpement-DRC BNS Basic necessities survey CAFEC Central Africa Forest Ecosystems Conservation CARPE Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment CBNRM Community-based natural resource management CLIP Consentement Libre Informé et Préalable CSO Civil society organization DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo EMAPS Environmental Monitoring and Policy Support ERZ Extractive resource zone EU European Union FARDC Forces armées de la République démocratique du Congo FED11 Fonds européen de développement (11ème) FY Fiscal year GPS Global positioning system Groupe de Recherche et d’appui aux interventions intégrées de la GRAINES malnutrition dans la santé HQ Headquarters ICCN Institut national pour la conservation de la nature IR Intermediate result IP Indigenous Peoples KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau LSA Landscape application LUP Land-use planning Ministère de l’environnement, conservation de la nature et développement MECNDD durable MIKE Monitoring the illegal killing of elephants MPI Max Planck Institute NGO Non-governmental organization NRGT Natural Resource Governance Tool OSFAC Observatoire satellitaire des forêts d’Afrique centrale PA Protected area REDD+ Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation SCAEMPS Central African Environmental Management and Policy Support SMART Spatial monitoring and reporting tool SNP Salonga National Park ToR Terms of reference TRAFFIC Thee Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network UNIKIN University of Kinshasa USAID United States Agency for International Development WCS World Conservation Society WRI World Resources Institute WWF World Wide Fund for Nature/World Wildlife Fund ZSM Zoological Society of Milwaukee April 2018 3 1. PROGRAM OVERVIEW/SUMMARY Program Name: FY18 Semi-Annual Report for LS8 Program Activity Start Date and October 01, 2013 to September 30, 2018 End Date: Name of Prime World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Implementing Partner: [Contract/Agreement] Cooperative Agreement #AID-660-A-13-0006 Number: Name of Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Subcontractors/Sub- awardees: Zoological Society of Milwaukee (ZSM) Major Counterpart Institut National pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) Organizations Geographic Coverage CAFEC LANDSCAPE 08: SALONGA-LUKENIE-SANKURU (landscape, province(s) Provinces of Kasai, Maï Ndombe, Sankuru and Tshuapa, and countries) Democratic Republic of the Congo Reporting Period: October 01, 2017 to March 31, 2018 1.1 Program Description/Introduction Salonga-Lukenie-Sankuru, located in central DRC south of the Maringa-Lopori-Wamba and east of the Lac Télé-Lac Tumba Landscapes, is one of the largest CARPE Landscapes. Approximately the size of Virginia, it is centered on the Salonga National Park, which is divided into two almost equally sized north and south sections. The Salonga National Park (SNP) itself, has been recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1984 and Africa's largest tropical rainforest park encompassing a nearly intact forest ecosystem of enormous ecological importance, sheltering the headwaters of seven major rivers, and home to the world’s largest bonobo population. If well protected, the Park holds the highest potential in the DRC for recovery of a long term viable forest elephant population. Furthermore, this pristine, barely explored forest covering an area of 33,000 km2 still includes the undisrupted floral and faunal assemblage of a lowland rainforest and is of untold importance for freshwater sources (including fisheries and drinking water) and carbon stocks. The landscape also includes three Community-Based Natural Resource Management Zones (CBNRMs) - Monkoto Corridor, Lotoi-Lokoro and Bolongo - in which community-based activities take place in an effort to support the preservation of the SNP and one Extractive Resource Zone (ERZ) - Oshwe. In 50 years, when large parts of Central African forests will likely have been converted, Salonga has the potential to remain one of the last refuges for biodiversity and carbon sequestration. It is in this context that the consortium has chosen the strategies described. Climate change strategies center around maintaining the current forest cover with the communities through prevention rather than through restoration, as deforestation rates are still low in and around the park. Biodiversity strategies focus on maintaining the current animal populations with the long-term aim of increasing those populations presently impacted by poaching, such as elephants. This is done through improved park management and law enforcement, as well as involving the local communities and political-administrative authorities in the four provinces in which the Salonga National Park is located. The continued and ever-increasing threat of illegal hunting for ivory and bush-meat is one of the main focuses of the consortium. The lack of sufficient park management capacity and law enforcement remain important challenges, especially given the enormous size of the Salonga National Park. Other major issues facing SNP include expensive and demanding logistics, a guard force that lacks skills, experience and the necessary equipment, and inadequate infrastructure. Fortunately, additional funds from the German Development Bank (KfW) and the Environmental Development Fund (EDF - from the EU) have been leveraged as a result of the co-management agreement signed on August 27, 2015. This agreement formalizes WWF’s role as a key partner of ICCN’s who will support major improvements in general park management. These leveraged funds, together with CAFEC funding, will help ensure that infrastructure, logistics and training needs are addressed - along with the development of alternative livelihoods and constituency building. Indeed, participation and buy-in from neighboring communities will be key to reducing pressures on SNP. Working with communities is key to achieving both our biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change, as educated, healthy and stable communities are less likely to enter the SNP to poach and overfish, or continue to practice slash and burn agriculture – a primary threat to forest cover throughout the Salonga Landscape. Under the WWF-ICCN co-management scheme and together with the CAFEC consortium partners’ WCS and ZSM, as well as Oxfam, the Max Planck Institute, the Italian based NGO ISCO, and the local NGOs AASD, activities are implemented to address these challenges – building on the main lessons learned from past experiences. April 2018 5 2. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS 2.1 Overall progress Following the establishment of appropriate monitoring mechanisms for the Salonga National Park, FY18 has so far been dedicated to continue the setup of a working co- management scheme with funds from additional donors such as the German Development Bank (KfW) and the European Development Fund (EDF). Despite the logistical challenge of accessing the landscape, along with the delay in receiving the first USAID obligation to cover the implementation in the first half of the year, significant achievements have been observed – and specifically in certain macro-zones. The activities of all CAFEC partners for the first semester of FY18 focused on two main areas: Biodiversity conservation and combating wildlife trafficking as well as community development. The purpose of this phase was to consolidate on the successful approaches while at the same time focusing on the nine areas of focus that emerged from the results of the mid-term evaluation. To better understand the progress observed in the implementation of our activities and the provisional results obtained, we propose to analyze them according to the 5 intervention strategies in the Salonga landscape. Strengthen Protected Area (PA) management capacity (strategy 1) Concerning the Biodiversity Conservation and Combating Wildlife Trafficking, the CAFEC consortium partners continued to contribution to the patrols organized by the Park Management Unit (UGPNS). This support consists of planning and evaluating patrols, as well as providing fuel and rations for the six sectors. Significant support has also been provided to strengthen the capacity of ecoguards and increase their level of participation in wildlife surveys. Compared to previous years, the FY18 mid-term figures confirm the trend of improving patrol efforts initiated in FY17 (102 patrols, for an effort of 11,364 person days and 12,773.33 km of patrols). This is the result of the efforts of all partners through a harmonized approach. Though some delays have occurred in the completion of inventories in the Monkoto Corridor (24%), we note the availability of data concerning key species in the northern block, while analysis are pending for the southern block data where MPI have complete inventories. Also data from the re-survey of the Etate surveillance area is being analyzed as part of the training for the ICCN biomonitoring team. This team conducted a resurvey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo Conservation Assessment
    Bonobo Conservation Assessment November 21-22, 1999 Kyoto University Primate Research Institute Inuyama, Japan Workshop Report Sally Coxe, Norm Rosen, Philip Miller and Ulysses Seal, editors A Contribution of the Workshop Participants and The Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (IUCN / SSC) A contribution of the workshop participants and the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Cover photo ©Frans Lanting Section divider photos: Sections I, V courtesy of Sally Coxe Sections II – IV, VI ©Frans Lanting Coxe, S., N. Rosen, P.S. Miller, and U.S. Seal. 2000. Bonobo Conservation Assessment Workshop Final Report. Apple Valley, MN: Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN). Additional copies of the publication can be ordered through the IUCN / SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124 USA. Fax: 612-432-2757. Send checks for US$35 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US bank. The CBSG Conservation Council These generous contributors make the work of CBSG possible $50,000 and above Gladys Porter Zoo Ouwehands Dierenpark Hong Kong Zoological and Riverbanks Zoological Park Chicago Zoological Society Botanical Gardens Wellington Zoo -Chairman Sponsor Japanese Association of Zoological Wildlife World Zoo SeaWorld/Busch Gardens Gardens and Aquariums (JAZA) Zoo de Granby Kansas City Zoo Zoo de la Palmyre $20,000 and above Laurie Bingaman Lackey Evenson Design Group Los Angeles Zoo $250 and above Minnesota Zoological Garden Madrid Zoo-Parques
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Mission to Democratic Republic of Congo, September 29 – October 21, 2006
    Mission to Democratic Republic of Congo, September 29 – October 21, 2006 Trip Report for International Programs, USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Version: 21 May 2007 Bruce G. Marcot, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 S.W. Main St., Suite 400, Portland, Oregon 97205, 503-808-2010, [email protected] John G. Sidle, USDA Forest Service 125 N. Main St., Chadron, Nebraska 69337, 308-432-0300, [email protected] CONTENTS 1 Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2 Introduction and Setting ………………………………………………………….…………… 3 3 Terms of Reference ……………………….…………………...……………………………… 4 4 Team Members and Contacts ………………………………………………….……………… 4 5 Team Schedule and Itinerary …………………………………………..….………...………… 4 6 Main Findings ................................…………………………………………….……....……… 5 7 Discussion and Recommendations ........………………………...…….......................….……... 10 8 Acknowledgments...…………………………………………………………………..….……. 15 Appendices 1. Terms of reference ..…………………………...…………………...………...………. 16 2. Team members and contacts made ..…………………………………...…......……… 19 3. Observations on biodiversity at Salonga National Park and environs ........................... 22 4. Forest Service presentation on planning at Kinshasa workshop ................................... 27 5. Suggested glossary terms for Salonga National Park Management Plan ...................... 31 6. Interviews with various personnel and local officials ................................................... 32 Disclaimer of brand names and Web links The use of trade, firm,
    [Show full text]
  • Background Between July 2Nd and September 5Th Simon Lewis and Me (Wannes Hubau) Did a Second Census on 9 Primary Forest Plots Located in Salonga National Park, DRC
    Background Between July 2nd and September 5th Simon Lewis and me (Wannes Hubau) did a second census on 9 primary forest plots located in Salonga National Park, DRC. This mission was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant ‘Tropical Forests in the Changing Earth System’ (T-FORCES) at Leeds University, UK. For those who have heard of “The Salonga”, the park often has a mythical status. It is located in the deep heart of the dark forests of the Congo Basin, it is very hard to access and it contains a number of near-mythical creatures such as the African slender-snouted crocodile, the forest elephant, the bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee) and the Congo peafowl. The latter two are endemic in the Congo Basin. Salonga National Park (1°00'-3°20'S, 20°-22°30'E) is the world’s second largest tropical rainforest national park. It was already proposed as the Tshuapa National Park in 1956 by the Belgians and it gained its present boundaries with a 1970 decree by President Mobutu Sese Seko. The park was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1984 and added to the List of World Heritage in Danger in 1999. The park has been cleared of any human presence. There are no settlements and no roads. The last remaining residents of the park, the Iyaelima, are under pressure to leave the park by the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). Most of the park is located in the vast Equateur Province of DRC, on roughly 600 km from the capital Mbandaka.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Conservation Strategy 2012–2022 About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature- based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 8,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc IUCN Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Bonobos and Other Large Mammals in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo
    Oryx Vol 34 No 3 July 2000 A survey of bonobos and other large mammals in the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo Ellen Van Krunkelsven, Inogwabini Bila-lsia and Dirk Draulans Abstract In December 1997 and January 1998 we trav- indicate that key forest species, including bonobo, bongo elled to the northern section of the Salonga National Park Tragelaphus euryceros, black mangabey Lophocebus alter- in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The park is the imus and leopard Panthera pardus, are present in reason- largest African rain forest reserve, and was created in able numbers in the part of the park we explored. Bonobo 1970 to protect endemic species such as the bonobo Pan density was calculated at 1.15 animals per sq km, based paniscus and the Congo peacock Afropavo congensis. on nest counts. Some elephants Loxodonta africana sur- However, hardly any data exist on the status of animals vive, despite the enormous hunting pressure. Conserva- in the park. In order to collect basic information, we set tion measures to protect the animals need to be taken up camp at four sites along two rivers, where we urgently. followed long trails deep into the forest. A total of 7.5 km line transects were cut from three sites, along which all Keywords Bonobos, Democratic Republic of Congo, evidence of large mammals was recorded. Our data mammals, Salonga National Park, threats. amuses Hippopotamus amphibius (Bavela Vuadi, 1987; Introduction D'Huart, 1988; East, 1990). This situation still prevailed In 1956, King Leopold III of Belgium sailed on the in 1996, when security problems prevented parrot re- Salonga River east from the village of Watsi Kengo, and searchers from sailing the Salonga (Fotso, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Monte Alén-Monts De Cristal Landscape
    12. Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Figure 12.1. Map of Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape (Sources: CARPE, JRC, SRTM, WCS-Gabon). Location and area he Monte Alén-Monts de Cristal Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Tcovers the south and southeast of Equatorial Guinea and the northwest of Gabon (Figure 12.1). Coordinates: 1°53’35’’N – 0°5’38’’N; 9°37’2’’E – 11°36’3’’E It has an area of approximately 26,747 km2, of Area: 26,747 km2 which about half is located in Equatorial Guinea Elevation: 300-1,250 m and half in Gabon. In Equatorial Guinea, it in- Terrestrial ecoregion: Atlantic Congolese forests ecoregion cludes the Monte Alén and Altos de Nsork na- Aquatic ecoregions: Central West equatorial coastal ecoregion tional parks, as well as the Rio Muni Estuary Southwest equatorial coastal ecoregion Reserve and the Piedra Nzas Natural Monument. Protected areas: In Gabon, it comprises the two sections of Monts Monte Alén National Park, 200,000 ha, 1988/2000, Equatorial Guinea de Cristal National Park. Altos de Nsork National Park, 40,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Monts de Cristal National Park, 120,000 ha, 2002, Gabon Physical environment Rio Muni Estuary Reserve, 70,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Piedra Nzas Natural Monument, 19,000 ha, 2000, Equatorial Guinea Relief and altitude Th e Landscape occupies a rugged area of pla- teaus and mountain chains mainly situated at an altitude of 300 m to 650 m to the northeast of the coastal sedimentary basin of Gabon (Figure 12.2). In Equatorial Guinea, the highest peak is formed by Monte Mitra, which rises to 1,250 m and is 114 the culminating point of the Niefang chain which runs from the southwest to the northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Surveillance
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation Africa Regional Program FY 2017 Summary of Projects In FY 2017, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) awarded funding to 25 projects totaling $15,170,086 through the Africa Regional Program, which was matched by $13,717,937 in additional leveraged funds. Unless otherwise noted, all projects were funded through the Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE). Field projects in eight countries (in alphabetical order below) and several regional projects in multiple countries were supported. Modifications to Existing Cooperative Agreeements and Grants CAMEROON AFR1413 Grant # F14AP00533 Scholarships, technical, and institutional capacity building at Garoua Wildlife College, Cameroon, Phase II. In partnership with Ecole de Faune de Garoua (Garoua Wildlife College). This modification supports the fourth year of this five-year cooperative agreement. Activities include: (1) scholarships for selected staff of Central African national parks and non- governmental organizations to earn diplomas in wildlife management at Garoua Wildlife College; and (2) support for Garoua Wildlife College faculty to improve their understanding and practice of the implementation of the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and to incorporate emerging threats to wildlife into the College’s curriculum. USFWS: $168,6601 Leveraged Funds: $36,500 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO (DRC) AFR0195 Grant # F13AP00859 Building a self-sustaining
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Bonobo (Pan Paniscus) Occurrence in Relation To
    MODELING BONOBO (PAN PANISCUS) OCCURRENCE IN RELATION TO BUSHMEAT HUNTING, SLASH-AND-BURN AGRICULTURE, AND TIMBER HARVEST: HARMONIZING BONOBO CONSERVATION WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT by JENA RENEE HICKEY (Under the Direction of NATHAN P. NIBBELINK and JOHN P. CARROLL) ABSTRACT Bushmeat hunting is anticipated to directly influence the distribution of bonobos through mortality of individuals and/or indirectly via bonobo avoidance of areas with higher hunting activity. Fragmentation of lowland rainforest is expected to facilitate hunter access to potential bonobo habitat, thereby reducing bonobo occurrence and reducing the effective habitat afforded by fragmented forests. We calculated four bonobo-specific fragmentation metrics based on remotely sensed data and fit univariate logistic regression models relating each metric to bonobo nest occurrence data collected in 2009. We found strong correlation between all fragmentation metrics and bonobo nest occurrence, with nests less likely to occur as fragmentation increased. We ranked the metrics based on predictive accuracy, with forest edge density (ED) ranking the highest. Using a maximum entropy modeling approach and 10 years of collaboratively compiled bonobo nest data, we built the first spatially explicit multivariate model predicting the rangewide distribution of bonobos. Of the rangewide environmental variables tested, the most important were distance from agriculture, distance from roads, ED, percent forest, and distance from river. Except percent forest, we view these predictors as proxies of hunting impact. Areas closer to agriculture are closer to human populations who tend to hunt in the surrounding forest. Roads and navigable rivers provide human access to areas that would otherwise likely be less vulnerable to hunting. ED distills the information of forest fragmentation from agriculture, logging, major rivers, and roads into a single metric that relates to hunter accessibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: Survey and Conservation Issues
    Oryx Vol 39 No 1 January 2005 Short Communication Fishes of the Salonga National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo: survey and conservation issues Bila-Isia Inogwabini Abstract Data were collected on the species richness Park have yet to be documented, but it is likely that these and abundance of fishes at two sites in the Salonga fishing techniques are having negative effects on the National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. Thirty fish fauna and urgent action is required to curb such species were identified out of a total of 1,180 fish caught. activities, at least within the Park. Claria buthupogon and Synodontis nigriventris (respec- tively 4.7 and 3.5 catches per net-night) were the most Keywords Abundance index, Democratic Republic of abundant species. Twenty-six other fish species were Congo, fish, fishing practices, species richness, Salonga reported from interviews with local people. Conserva- National Park. tion concerns are the burning of breeding sites, use of chemicals for fishing, and the newly introduced practice This paper contains supplementary material that can of dynamite fishing. The effects of these practices in the only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org Fish are the most abundant class of vertebrates but are collection of fish that take refuge in muddy areas beneath the least known (Groombridge, 1992), and freshwater these plants (Corsi, 1984; Inogwabini; et al., 2000; pers. habitats are subjected to unprecedented levels of human obs.). All these practices are used in the Park without any disturbance (Saunders et al., 2002). Fish are a major food prior evaluation having been conducted to ensure that resource and an important economic asset in the central harvesting of fish is sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Forests of the Congo Basin Overview
    1. Forests of the Congo Basin Overview ollowing the Amazonian forests, the forests of Fthe Congo Basin constitute the second larg- est area of dense tropical rainforest in the world. Th ey stretch from the coast of the Gulf of Guinea in the west to the mountains of the Albertine Rift in the east1 and cover about seven degrees of latitude on either side of the equator. Th ey are mostly within the Guinea-Congo forest structure, of which they constitute over 80% of the total area. In the west of Cameroon and the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo, they also include the Afromontane forests. Th is report focuses on the forests of the countries forming part of the CBFP partnership - Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, the Figure 1.3. Precipitation Central African Republic (CAR), the Republic of Africa are located between 300 and 1000 m of al- in Cenral Africa Congo and the Democratic Republic of Congo titude (Figure 1.2). Only the forests in the coastal (Sources : ESRI, (DRC). Th e area of these forests nears 200 mil- sedimentary basin, which represent 7% of the to- Worldclim data, lion hectares (Figure 1.1); however estimates of tal area of the forests and are located mainly in University of California, their area vary considerably. Certain estimates are Cameroon and Gabon, are at a height of less than Berkeley, USA). at the least surprising2, but even the weakest esti- 300m (page 82). mates vary depending on what one considers to Th e submontane forests, at an altitude of be forests.
    [Show full text]