DOCSLIB.ORG

Biology and Cultural Control of Lesser Cornstalk Borer on Sugarcane

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biology and Cultural Control of Lesser Cornstalk Borer on Sugarcane BIOLOGY AND CULTURAL CONTROL OF LESSER CORNSTALK BORER ON SUGARCANE By HARDEV SINGH SANDHU A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2010 1 © 2010 Hardev Singh Sandhu 2 To my beloved parents, Mr. Joginder Singh and Mrs. Kulwant Kaur for their perpetual love and support and to my wife, Sandeep Sandhu for encouragement and understanding 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Gregg S. Nuessly, my doctoral committee chair, who provided excellent guidance, graduate training, motivation, unconditional support and trust to complete this project. He has mentored me throughout my doctoral studies, and his insight and guidance were essential in the completion of this dissertation. In addition, I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Susan E. Webb (Entomology and Nematology department) for providing laboratory facilities to complete biology studies and also for her helpful feedback and suggestions, Dr. Ronald H. Cherry (Everglades Research and Eduaction Center) for providing valuable suggestions for the improvement in writing research papers which became the part of this dissertation, and Dr. Robert A. Gilbert (EREC) for graciously agreeing to fill the outside member position on my committee and for critical review of manuscripts and valuable suggestions. I owe my sincere thanks to Drs. J. L. Capinera (Entomology and Nematology department) and K. Pernezny (EREC) for providing laboratory facilities for insect diet preparation. My special thanks to University of Florida extension agents Dr. R. Rice and L. Baucam, and L. Davis for their great help in finding research fields. I am deeply indebted to N. Larsen, M. Gonzalez, F. Sosa, J. Terry, G. Goyal, and B. Thappa (EREC) for assistance in moth collection, help in green house and field experiments. My sincere thanks to Drs. M. Brennan and J. Colee (Statistic department), and Drs. M. Josan and T. Lang (EREC) for assistance with statistics. I am extremely thankful to Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida and United States Sugar Corporation for providing funding for this study, and land for collecting insects and sugarcane. This work was made possible by student financial 4 support from the Wedgworth Graduate Fellowship and the University of Florida College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. I profoundly thank my parents for all of their encouragement throughout my graduate studies. I would not be who I am and I would not have accomplished this work without their immense love and support. I have no words to thank my wife, Sandeep Sandhu for always being there for me, for encouraging me when frustration occurred, for always staying positive, and for her unconditional love. Finally, I would like to thank almighty god to bless me with courage and patience for this whole study period. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ 9 LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ 11 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................................................................... 16 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 16 Insect Pests and Sugarcane ................................................................................... 17 Systematics and Distribution of Lesser Cornstalk Borer ......................................... 18 Description and Life Cycle ...................................................................................... 19 Eggs ................................................................................................................. 19 Larvae .............................................................................................................. 21 Pupae............................................................................................................... 23 Adults ............................................................................................................... 24 Longevity and Reproductive Behavior.............................................................. 25 Fecundity.......................................................................................................... 25 Generation Time............................................................................................... 27 Number of Generations .................................................................................... 27 Abiotic Factors Affecting Development ................................................................... 28 Temperature..................................................................................................... 28 Soil Moisture..................................................................................................... 28 Host Plants ............................................................................................................. 30 Plant Damage by Lesser Cornstalk Borer............................................................... 30 Peanuts ............................................................................................................ 30 Corn ................................................................................................................. 31 Sorghum........................................................................................................... 32 Soybean ........................................................................................................... 32 Sugarcane........................................................................................................ 32 Control Strategies ................................................................................................... 33 Cultural Control....................................................................................................... 34 Planting Time ................................................................................................... 34 Cultivation......................................................................................................... 34 Irrigation ........................................................................................................... 35 Destruction of Alternate Hosts.......................................................................... 35 Fertilization....................................................................................................... 36 Green Harvesting ............................................................................................. 36 Chemical Control .................................................................................................... 36 6 Peanuts ............................................................................................................ 37 Corn ................................................................................................................. 38 Cowpeas and Southern Peas........................................................................... 39 Sugarcane........................................................................................................ 39 Biological Control.................................................................................................... 40 Sampling................................................................................................................. 41 Research Goals ...................................................................................................... 42 2 TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT DEVELOPMENT OF LESSER CORNSTALK BORER, ELASMOPALPUS LIGNOSELLUS (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) ON SUGARCANE UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS........................................... 49 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 49 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 50 Insect Colony Maintenance .............................................................................. 51 Production of Sugarcane Plants ....................................................................... 51 Laboratory Temperature Developmental Studies ............................................. 52 Developmental Rate and Mathematical Models ............................................... 54 Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 56 Results.................................................................................................................... 56 Laboratory Temperature Developmental Studies ............................................. 56 Model Evaluation.............................................................................................. 58 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 59 Laboratory Temperature Developmental Studies ............................................. 59 Model Evaluation.............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunday, March 4, 2012
    Joint Meeting of the Southeastern and Southwestern Branches Entomological Society of America 4-7 March 2012 Little Rock, Arkansas 0 Dr. Norman C. Leppla President, Southeastern Branch of the Entomological Society of America, 2011-2012 Dr. Allen E. Knutson President, Southwestern Branch of the Entomological Society of America, 2011-2012 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Presidents Norman C. Leppla (SEB) and Allen E. 1 Knutson (SWB) ESA Section Names and Acronyms 5 PROGRAM SUMMARY 6 Meeting Notices and Policies 11 SEB Officers and Committees: 2011-2012 14 SWB Officers and Committees: 2011-2012 16 SEB Award Recipients 19 SWB Award Recipients 36 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM SATURDAY AND SUNDAY SUMMARY 44 MONDAY SUMMARY 45 Plenary Session 47 BS Student Oral Competition 48 MS Student Oral Competition I 49 MS Student Oral Competition II 50 MS Student Oral Competition III 52 MS Student Oral Competition IV 53 PhD Student Oral Competition I 54 PhD Student Oral Competition II 56 BS Student Poster Competition 57 MS Student Poster Competition 59 PhD Student Poster Competition 62 Linnaean Games Finals/Student Awards 64 TUESDAY SUMMARY 65 Contributed Papers: P-IE (Soybeans and Stink Bugs) 67 Symposium: Spotted Wing Drosophila in the Southeast 68 Armyworm Symposium 69 Symposium: Functional Genomics of Tick-Pathogen 70 Interface Contributed Papers: PBT and SEB Sections 71 Contributed Papers: P-IE (Cotton and Corn) 72 Turf and Ornamentals Symposium 73 Joint Awards Ceremony, Luncheon, and Photo Salon 74 Contributed Papers: MUVE Section 75 3 Symposium: Biological Control Success
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Diagnostics of Economically Important Wireworm Species (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the Midwestern United States a Thes
    Molecular Diagnostics of Economically Important Wireworm Species (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the Midwestern United States A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Erica Lindroth Dr. Thomas Clark, Thesis Supervisor August 2007 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled Molecular Diagnostics of Economically Important Wireworm Species (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the Midwestern United States presented by Erica Lindroth, a candidate for the degree of master of science, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. _________________________ Dr. Thomas Clark _________________________ Dr. Robert Sites _________________________ Dr. Brenda Beerntsen _________________________ Dr. George Smith i To my husband, for his patience. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Tom Clark, for his support and advice. I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Bob Sites, Dr. Brenda Beerntsen, and Dr. George Smith. Many thanks to the myriad students, extension workers, entomology professors, and farmers who helped me obtain wireworm samples, including: Tom Kuhar, John Van Duyn, Pat Davis, Chris DiFonzo, Gerald Wilde, Gary Hein, D. Moellenbeck, Lyndon Brush, Ben Puttler, Wayne Bailey, Francis Lloyd, Lisa Meihls, Kevin Steffey, Billy Fuller, Eileen Cullen, Greg Andrews, Greg Kerr, Gary Cramer, and Leslie Loehr. I would like to thank Sandy Briesacher for her help with laboratory procedures. Finally, I would like to thank Akekawat Vitheepradit for helping me learn about phylogenetic analyses and always letting me know when there was free food.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireworms' Management
    Insects 2013, 4, 117-152; doi:10.3390/insects4010117 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects Review :LUHZRUPV¶Management: An Overview of the Existing Methods, with Particular Regards to Agriotes spp. (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Fanny Barsics *, Eric Haubruge and François J. Verheggen Department of Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege. 2, Passage des Déportés, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.H.); [email protected] (F.J.V.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +3281-62-26-63; Fax: +3281-62-23-12. Received: 19 October 2012; in revised form: 13 December 2012 / Accepted: 26 December 2012 / Published: 25 January 2013 Abstract: Wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) are important soil dwelling pests worldwide causing yield losses in many crops. The progressive restrictions in the matter of efficient synthetic chemicals for health and environmental care brought out the need for alternative management techniques. This paper summarizes the main potential tools that have been studied up to now and that could be applied together in integrated pest management systems and suggests guidelines for future research. Keywords: wireworms; click beetles; Agriotes; integrated pest management 1. Introduction Wireworms are the larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae). They consist of more than 9,000 species distributed worldwide, [1] and some are important pests of a wide variety of crops, such as potato, cereals, carrot, sugar beet, sugarcane and soft fruits (e.g., [2±6]). In Europe, damages due to wireworm infestation are mainly attributed to the genus Agriotes Eschscholtz, as witnessed by the numerous studies aiming at their management.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1
    EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-795 EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Inventory and review of quantitative models for spread of plant pests for use in pest risk assessment for the EU territory1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 2 Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK ABSTRACT This report considers the prospects for increasing the use of quantitative models for plant pest spread and dispersal in EFSA Plant Health risk assessments. The agreed major aims were to provide an overview of current modelling approaches and their strengths and weaknesses for risk assessment, and to develop and test a system for risk assessors to select appropriate models for application. First, we conducted an extensive literature review, based on protocols developed for systematic reviews. The review located 468 models for plant pest spread and dispersal and these were entered into a searchable and secure Electronic Model Inventory database. A cluster analysis on how these models were formulated allowed us to identify eight distinct major modelling strategies that were differentiated by the types of pests they were used for and the ways in which they were parameterised and analysed. These strategies varied in their strengths and weaknesses, meaning that no single approach was the most useful for all elements of risk assessment. Therefore we developed a Decision Support Scheme (DSS) to guide model selection. The DSS identifies the most appropriate strategies by weighing up the goals of risk assessment and constraints imposed by lack of data or expertise. Searching and filtering the Electronic Model Inventory then allows the assessor to locate specific models within those strategies that can be applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Common Beans
    Teparies as a Source of Useful Traits for Improving Common Beans Item Type Article Authors Thomas, Claire V.; Manshardt, Richard M.; Waines, J. Giles Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 05:58:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552200 Thomas, Manshardt and Waines Source of Useful Traits 43 The tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) is of interest Tepariesas aSource for its intrinsic value as an under -exploited crop adapted to hot arid climates, and as a potential donor of desirable traits to the common bean P. vulgaris L.) through interspecific hybridiza- of Useful Traits for tion. Teparies possess several traits that could be valuable if transferred to common beans. Teparies are more heat and Improving Common drought resistant than common beans. They tolerate higher salt (Marcarian, 1981) and boron concentrations in the soil Beans (C. J. Lovatt, personal communication; J. G. Waines, unpubl.). They are tolerant of damage by lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmo- palpus lignosellus Zeller (Thomas, 1983). They show field res- istance to charcoal rot, caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid (Thomas, 1983). All of these factors combine to Claire V. Thomas produce a plant that performs well in hot, semiarid climates. In addition, they show high levels of resistance to Xanthomonas Richard M. Manshardt phaseoli (E.E Sm.) Dows, the bacterium that causes common blight of beans (Coyne and Schuster, 1973). and J. Giles Waines Teparies are routinely grown during the summer in parts of Department of Botany and Plant Sciences the American Southwest and adjacent Mexico, where they set University of California, Riverside pods when temperatures are too high for pod formation in common beans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological-Control-Programmes-In
    Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL-Wireworm-Pnw607.Pdf
    Wireworm Biology and Nonchemical Management in Potatoes in the Pacific Northwest N. Andrews, M. Ambrosino, G. Fisher, and S.I. Rondon PNW 607 December 2008 This bulletin is one of a series on organic potato produc- tion developed by OSPUD, a collaboration among Oregon State University personnel and 11 farmers operating diversi- 0.4 inch 0.4 inch fied organic vegetable farms. The purpose ofOSPUD is to 0.4 inch improve potato quality and profitability through a participatory learning process and on-farm, farmer-directed research. The first 2 years of OSPUD were supported by Western SARE Grant SW05-091. For more information on OSPUD, visit ospud.org. Agriotes Agriotes Limonius lineatus obscurus subauratus Wireworm is the common name for the larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera: Family Elateridae). The adults do little or no damage, although there are some anecdotal reports that they can damage certain crops (e.g., grapes and stone fruits) 0.4 inch 0.4 inch by feeding on flowers. However, larval wireworms are among 0.4 inch the most destructive of soil insect pests. They are important pests of potatoes and other crops, including corn, cereals, and carrots. Less frequently attacked are melons, beet roots, and strawberry fruits. Wireworms can also damage germinating seeds, but transplants are generally less susceptible. Their importance as crop pests seems to be increasing (Parker and Limonius Limonius Limonius Howard, 2001). californicus canus infuscatus This publication reviews the wireworm literature and provides information on wireworm biology, monitoring, risk Figure 1. Click beetle assessment, and nonchemical control options that can be inte- adults of the Pacific Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculture BUREAU of ENTOMOLOGY and Plat QUARANTIN!
    Bur. Ent. & P. Q. Issued June 1944 United States Department of Agriculture BUREAU OF ENTOMOLOGY AND PLAt QUARANTIN! SERVICE AND REGULATORY ANNOUNCEMENTS LIST OF INTERCEPTED PLANT PESTS, 1943 (List of Pests Recorded During the Period July 1, 1942, to June 30, 1943, Inclusive, as Intercepted in, on, or with Plants anid-Plant Products Entering United States Territory.) INTRODUCTION This report covers the thirtieth year for which lsts of pest interceptions have been issued. During the first year, the fiscal year 1914, a total of 1,456 inter- ceptions were recorded. The highest number in any list is 81,592 for the fiscal year 1940. Interceptions for the thirty-year period total more than 600,000. The records summarized in this report include pests intercepted in, on, or with plants and plant products (1) imported, (2) offered for but refused entry, (3) held as ships' stores, etc., and hence not imported through customs, (4) offered for entry for immediate export or for immediate transportation and exportation in bond, and (5) in domestic shipments between Hawaii and Puerto Rico and the mainland. Determinations of collections made near the close of the preceding year are included with data for the current year. In addition to routine reports and determinations by the personnel of this Bureau, considerable information is supplied by State and customs officials. Staffs of specialists maintained by the States of California and Florida and the Territory of Hawaii determine most of the interceptions made there, and specialists of the Bureau of Plant Industry determine a large part of the more difficult plant-disease material.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture
    Reaping the benefits Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture October 2009 Cover image: From an illustration of a push-pull system for pest control, courtesy of The Gatsby Charitable Foundation. The Quiet Revolution: Push-Pull Technology and the African Farmer. Gatsby Charitable Foundation 2005. Reaping the benefi ts: science and the sustainable intensifi cation of global agriculture RS Policy document 11/09 Issued: October 2009 RS1608 ISBN: 978-0-85403-784-1 © The Royal Society, 2009 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society Science Policy 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Tel +44 (0)20 7451 2500 Email [email protected] Web royalsociety.org Design by Franziska Hinz, Royal Society, London Copyedited and Typeset by Techset Composition Limited Reaping the benefi ts: science and the sustainable intensifi cation of global agriculture Contents Foreword v Membership of working group vii Summary ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 An urgent challenge 1 1.2 Trends in food crop production 2 1.3 Science in context 5 1.4 The need for sustainable intensifi cation 6 1.5 Agricultural sustainability 7 1.6 Agriculture and sustainable economic development 7 1.7 Other major studies 8 1.8 Further UK work 9 1.9 About this report 9 1.10 Conduct of the study 10 2 Constraints on future food crop production 11 2.1 Climate change 11 2.2 Water 11 2.3 Temperature 12 2.4 Ozone 13 2.5 Soil factors 13 2.6 Crop nutrition 15 2.7 Pests, diseases and weed competition 16 2.8 Energy and greenhouse
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding Poster
    Overt or Undercover? Investigating the Invasive Species of Beetles on Long Island Authors: Brianna Francis1,2 , Isabel Louie1,3 Mentor: Brittany Johnson1 1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory DNA Learning Center; 2Scholars’ Academy; 3Sacred Heart Academy Abstract Sample Number Species (Best BLAST Match) Number Found Specimen Photo Our goal was to analyze the biodiversity of beetles in Valley Stream State Park to identify native PKN-003 Porcellio scaber (common rough woodlouse) and non-native species using DNA Barcoding. PCR was performed on viable samples to amplify 1 DNA to be barcoded via DNA Subway. After barcoding, it was concluded that only two distinct species of beetles were collected, many of the remaining species being different variations of PKN-004 Oniscus asellus (common woodlouse) 1 woodlice. PKN-009 Melanotus communis (wireworm) 2 Introduction PKN-011 Agriotes oblongicollis (click beetle) 1 Beetles are the largest group of animals on earth, with more than 350,000 species. It is important to document species of beetles due to an increase in invasive species that may harm the environment. We set out to measure the diversity in the population of beetles in Valley Stream PKN-019 Philoscia muscorum (common striped 9 State Park in terms of non-native and/or invasive species. It was inferred that the population of woodlouse) non-native and invasive species would outnumber the population of native species. PKN-020 Parcoblatta uhleriana (Uhler’s wood 1 cockroach) Materials & Methods ● 21 Samples were collected at Valley Stream State Park with a quadrat, pitfall trap, and bark beetle trap Discussion ● DNA was extracted from samples, and PCR and gel electrophoresis were conducted ● 11 samples were identified as woodlice, all of which are native to Europe, but have spread ● The CO1-gene of viable samples were sequenced and identified through DNA Barcoding globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Cornstalk Borer " Elasmopalpus Lignosellus (Zeller )
    Entomology Circular No.236 Flao Depto Agrico and Consumer Servo March 1982 Division of Plant Industry Lesser cornstalk borer " Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller ) (LEPIDOPTERA:PYRALIDAE)l Wayne N, Dixon2 INTRODUCTION: The lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (Zeller), attacks a variety of agricul- tural crop species (Metcalf et al., 1962). Less well known is the fact that seedlings of forest nurseries are susceptible to infestation and may incur severe damage or mortality. In 1981, nearly 1 million seedlings were killed by larvae of the lesser cornstalk borer in a forest nursery located in Central Florida. DESCRIPTION: Adult moth is light to dark brown with a wingspan of 16-24 rnm (fig. 1). Forewings of female uniformly dark brown to black; male forewings differ in their lighter coloration and presence of gray to black margins. Egg is 0.5 mm long, pitted, and greenish-white when laid, turning to deep red prior to hatch. Mature larva (6th instar) is bright green to turquoise, striped longitudinally with brown, and the head capsule is dark brown to black. Length 17-20 rnm (King et al., 1961). DISTRIBUTION: The lesser cornstalk borer occurs throughout the southern United States, Central America, South America, and the West Indies (Luginbill and Ainslie, 1917). ~: It is commonly associated with Arachis hypogaea L., Digitaria spp., Glycine ~ (L.) Herr. , and ~ ~ L. Over 40 other agricultural species are suitable host plants, but space limitation prevents a complete listing. Isley and Miner (1944) observed an apparent preference of the larvae for members of the grass family (Gramineae). Recorded tree species include: ~ florida L., Cupressus arizonica Greene, Juniperus silicicola (Small) Bailey, ~ sylvatica Marsh.
    [Show full text]