DOCSLIB.ORG

OT Apocrypha and the Canon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OT Apocrypha and the Canon OT Apocrypha and the Canon © Bennie R. Crockett, Jr., 2005 1. Importance, Authority, and Extent of the OT Canon 2. Influence of the OT Apocrypha 3. Recommended Bibliography 1. Importance, Authority, and Extent of the OT Canon The notion of a Christian “canon” refers to that which is a standard for the practice of faith. In the second century, the church found itself challenged internally by different ideas of God/Jesus and externally by Roman persecution/ostracism. As the church grew, it defended itself in three ways: 1) canon [OT and NT], 2) creed ["Jesus is Lord"], and 3) clergy [monepiscopacy]. Two classic apologists (defenders) were Justin Martyr (AD 160) and Irenaeus (AD 185). Also, the passing of the apostles and the decline of eschatological expectation had caused somewhat of a dilemma for early Christians; in a sense, one could argue that the biblical canon was an institutional replacement of the living voice of Jesus and the apostles. By AD 200, there was general consensus in the Western and Eastern churches in favor of the Jewish canon of the OT (formalized by some Pharisees at Jamnia in the late first century), the four Gospels, Acts, the letters of Paul (including Hebrews, though disputed), 1 Peter, and 1 John. Not until 367 was there a list of the current 27 NT books. No church council voted and set forth a definitive canon list; rather, use in the churches and belief in apostolic origin yielded the biblical canon. Of importance here, however, is the fact that the early church used the Septuagint Greek text for the OT. Since the apocryphal books were written primarily in Greek, the Hebrew Bible did not include the apocryphal books. The Septuagint text included what later became known as the “apocrypha” (i.e., hidden books). Despite the Hebrew canon adopted at Jamnia (22 books in Hebrew; 39 in translation in a different order), the early church did not use the Hebrew Bible. Of import is the fact that the vast majority of OT quotations in the NT derive from the Septuagint, and without question, the Bible of the early church was the Septuagint, and later and more importantly for the Western churches, the Latin Vulgate. Since the Septuagint included the apocryphal books and the Hebrew Bible did not, there was ongoing debate about the books’ validity for the faith and practice of the early church. Despite the debate, the church fathers continued to quote and use the books alongside the OT and NT books. Use in support of argument was an important methodological criterion. Of equal, if not more, importance to the Septuagint’s inclusion of the OT Apocrypha, Jerome (AD 400) included them (i.e., Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, or Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, and additional chapters for Daniel and Esther) in his Latin translation, the Vulgate (i.e., "the common tongue"). Though he doubted the authenticity of the Apocrypha, his inclusion of the books in his papal-commissioned translation marked the West’s practical adoption and liturgical use of the OT Apocrypha as scripture. Jerome translated the OT from the Hebrew Bible, the Apocrypha from the Septuagint, and the NT from the Greek. As the Latin language replaced the Greek in the western church, there were occasional questions about the Apocrypha’s inclusion, but it continued to be read alongside the canonical books in the OT and NT. The Eastern Church continued to use the Septuagint text for its OT, so the bulk of the apocryphal books were not questioned there, though Revelation was criticized in the East for its violent theme. In the West from Jerome (AD 400) to Luther’s OT (1530), the OT always included the apocryphal books. The early English translations of the OT from Wycliff (1385) to the King James Version (1611), the English Revised Version (1898), and the Revised Standard Version (1952; 1971; 1989) always included the Apocrypha. As a result, the cultural, artistic, musical, and textual influence of the OT Apocrypha has been enormous. Luther did not accept the OT Apocrypha as scripture because the books were not part of the Hebrew canon. However, Luther did include the books in a separate section in his German Bible, and his theology continued to reveal content from the Bible which included the OT Apocrypha and an Augustinian foundation. Luther argued that one should read the OT Apocrypha for an understanding of the NT’s background. Of note also is the fact that Luther doubted the authenticity and canonicity of four NT books— Hebrews, James, Jude, Revelation—all of which had been questioned by various writers for centuries. Calvin and other Reformers accepted Luther’s judgment about the OT Apocrypha, but rejected his argument about the four NT books. The fountainhead of all English modern Bible translation, William Tyndale in 1526, followed Luther in separating the four books from the rest of the NT. (Of all the NT books, Calvin did not write an exegesis of Revelation, which has caused some to suggest that he doubted the book’s authenticity and canonicity.) In the Catholic Counter-Reformation, the Council of Trent (1546) reaffirmed the Latin Vulgate as the inerrant Word of God; as stated above, the Vulgate included the OT Apocrypha books. The Eastern Orthodox Church did not undergo a “reformation,” and the Apocryphal books were not questioned since they were part of the natural flow of the Septuagint. Even today, there is no agreement on how many books are in the OT Apocrypha; Eastern Orthodoxy accepts three books (i.e., 3-4 Maccabees, Psalm 151) in addition to what Roman Catholics accept. Evangelical Protestants have followed the tenor of the Westminster Confession, "The books commonly called Apocrypha, not being of divine inspiration, are no part of the Canon of Scripture; and therefore are of no authority in the Church of God, nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of, than other human writings," but other Protestants have followed the general statement in the Anglican Catechism "The Apocrypha is a collection of additional books written by people of the Old Covenant, and used in the Christian Church" 2. Influence of the OT Apocrypha To understand the cultural and religious milieu of first century Judaism, the Apocrypha is more important than the OT itself. A failure to understand the basic content of the Apocrypha especially limits one’s understanding of the NT. 1 and 2 Maccabees are crucial for an awareness of historical events in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC; these books give significant background information about Judaism’s sectarian and sociological development. Tobit, Susanna, and Judith form the basis of Jewish moralistic and pietistic novels, and they reveal a picture of Jewish morality at the time of Jesus. Early Christian moral formation undoubtedly received influence from the upstanding examples of piety in these books. The books also are very important for an understanding of the development of Pharisaism. A variant of the Golden Rule appears in Tobit 4:14-15: “what you hate, do not do to any one.” As a Pharisee, St. Paul would have been familiar with these books. One striking example of influence related specifically to Christmas is from Wisdom of Solomon 18:14-16, a classic piece of hellenistic-Jewish poetry: [14] For while gentle silence enveloped all things, and night in its swift course was now half gone, [15] thy all-powerful word leaped from heaven, from the royal throne, into the midst of the land that was doomed, a stern warrior [16] carrying the sharp sword of thy authentic command, and stood and filled all things with death, and touched heaven while standing on the earth. This text from Wisdom has had an enormous influence on the interpretation of John 1:1-5,14 and Rev. 19:13-16. “Thy all-powerful word” was interpreted by the fathers as a distinct reference to the incarnation, and was cited in the same manner as OT prophetic texts. “Carrying the sharp sword” was read in reference to Rev. 19:13 ff. Of devotional and mythic interest, “gentle silence enveloped all things” undoubtedly influenced both “Silent Night” and “the silent stars go by” (i.e., “O Little Town of Bethlehem”). The phrase “Night . was not half gone” was the basis for the tradition that Jesus was born at midnight (i.e., “It Came Upon the Midnight Clear”). Also in the history of interpretation, the Word (logos) was associated with Wisdom (sophia). In “O Come, O Come Emmanuel,” the author coupled these ideas—“O come, thou Wisdom from on high,” seemingly a union of the text above with the use of Wisdom as a practical synonym of Word. Both the poetic Wisdom of Solomon and Sirach (i.e., Ecclesiasticus, "The Church Book") contain extensive passages on the personification of Wisdom (cf. Prov. 8). Other textual and ideological comparisons with the NT occur throughout OT Apocrypha. There are many readings from the OT Apocrypha in the liturgical year for both Catholicism and Anglicanism, the predecessors of all English-speaking Protestants in America. 3. Recommended Bibliography Biblical Canon (Monograph) F. F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1988). Online Introductions to the OT Apocrypha http://www.gnte.org/ecopub/apocrypha.htm (by Bruce M. Metzger, leading Greek NT text critical scholar, 1946-1990; retired from Princeton Theological Seminary) http://www.orthodoxanglican.net/downloads/apocrypha.pdf (by Robert Dentan, an Anglican of Berkeley Divinity School, who argues for the value of the OTA for an understanding of the NT) http://www.bible-researcher.com/canon2.html--The Old Testament Canon and Apocrypha OT Apocrypha (Monographs) Bruce M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Question 33 - Is the 66-Book Biblical Canon Completed and Closed?
    Scholars Crossing 101 Most Asked Questions 101 Most Asked Questions About the Bible 1-2019 Question 33 - Is the 66-Book Biblical Canon completed and closed? Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/questions_101 Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "Question 33 - Is the 66-Book Biblical Canon completed and closed?" (2019). 101 Most Asked Questions. 17. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/questions_101/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the 101 Most Asked Questions About the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in 101 Most Asked Questions by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 101 MOST ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BIBLE 33. Is the 66-Book Biblical Canon completed and closed? The question may be answered by both a no and yes response: A. Hypothetically and theoretically . no. Although all known evidence would seem to be a trillion to one against it, it remains nevertheless theoretically possible that God may, through some totally unexpected circumstances and for some hitherto inconceivable reason, suddenly decide to add a sixty-seventh book to the canon prior to Christ’s return. B. Practically and realistically . yes. This is concluded by a three-fold line of evidence. 1. Scriptural evidence Dr. Robert Lightner writes: “The first reason is stated in two passages of Scripture. Jude 3 refers to the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints, a body of truth more authoritative than one’s personal belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Early New Testament Canons
    Early New Testament Canons illegallyAlexander or sledge-hammers.leasing infrequently. Wang Unsinewing impaling Magnuscloudily? Sanforize or transcendentalizing some scarps overwhelmingly, however dedicational Billie demoralizes His own gospels vary, early new testament canons of irenaeus, among scholars do another source goes to How We Got the New Testament: Text, Transmission, Translation. New testament were derived from which early new testament. Church history and caused much better greek? Alpha and Omega Ministries is a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. But there may argue even death for understanding biblical account was early new? Please check your knowledge. What were the principal criteria by which various books were recognized as being a part of the NT Scriptures? New Testament history set by the end shuffle the way century. Another factor which included romans as canonical gospels which were mentioned by no. Word of God for eternal life. How do you have no conspiracy about their canons we owe it would be used it was going out a canonization. Church in Jerusalem using? After all, Judaism achieved a closed canon without primary reliance on the codex. This demonstrates that loan were in circulation before whose time. It more specifically this? Jesus as the revealer of the inner truth about the cellular human utility than and find the Mark, down in Matthew. Well as early church tradition, testaments were also their way that john, beneficial but only thing. Gospels, four books; the Acts of the Apostles, one hang; the Epistles of Paul, thirteen; of the supplement to the Hebrews; one Epistle; of Peter, two; of John, apostle, three; of James, one; of Jude, one; the Revelation of John.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELINE of EARLY CHRISTIAN HISTORY: 100 AD to 800 AD C 100 St
    TIMELINE OF EARLY CHRISTIAN HISTORY: 100 AD TO 800 AD c 100 St. John dies. End of Apostolic age 107 Ignatius of Antioch martyred 156 Polycarp martyred 161-180 Persecution of Christians increases under Marcus Aurelius c 165 Justin Martyr martyred c 180 Irenaeus of Lyon writes Against Heresies 184 Birth of Origen 250 Persecution of Christians under Decius 253 Death of Origen, shortly after suffering two years of imprisonment and torture 303-312 The Diocletian persecution – the Roman empire’s last, largest and bloodiest persecution of Christians 310 Armenia becomes the first country to adopt Christianity as its official religion. 312 Constantine, at the Battle of Milvian Bridge, experiences vision of the cross carrying the message, In Hoc Signo Vinces ("with this sign, you shall win") 313 Constantine issues the Edict of Milan, providing for the toleration of Christianity and Christians c 323 Eusebius of Caesarea completes Ecclesiastical History 325 First Council of Nicaea (the first ecumenical council) is convened by Constantine. Debate rages over whether Christ is of the "same substance" or "similar substance" to God. The position of Arius, that Christ was of “similar substance” (i.e., that he is a created being), is refuted. Nicene Creed is drawn up, declaring Christ to be "Begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father." 324 Constantinople becomes capital of the Roman Empire 349 Birth of John Chrysostom 354 Birth of Augustine of Hippo 367 Athanasius, in his annual festal letter to the churches of Alexandria, lists the 27 books he believed should constitute the New Testament 380 Theodosius issues the Edict of Thessalonica, declaring Nicene Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire 381 First Council of Constantinople is convened by Theodosius.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biblical Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church
    Anke Wanger THE-733 1 Student Name: ANKE WANGER Student Country: ETHIOPIA Program: MTH Course Code or Name: THE-733 This paper uses [x] US or [ ] UK standards for spelling and punctuation The Biblical Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church 1) Introduction The topic of Biblical canon formation is a wide one, and has received increased attention in the last few decades, as many ancient manuscripts have been discovered, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, and the question arose as to whether the composition of the current Biblical canon(s) should be re-evaluated based on these and other findings. Not that the question had actually been settled before, as can be observed from the various Church councils throughout the last two thousand years with their decisions, and the fact that different Christian denominations often have very different books included in their Biblical Canons. Even Churches who are in communion with each other disagree over the question of which books belong in the Holy Bible. One Church which occupies a unique position in this regard is the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahdo Church. Currently, it is the only Church whose Bible is comprised of Anke Wanger THE-733 2 81 Books in total, 46 in the Old Testament, and 35 in the New Testament.1 It is also the biggest Bible, according to the number of books: Protestant Bibles usually contain 66 books, Roman Catholic Bibles 73, and Eastern Orthodox Bibles have around 76 books, sometimes more, sometimes less, depending on their belonging to the Greek Orthodox, Slavonic Orthodox, or Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKING out the BIBLE January 30/31, 2019 Rev
    CHRISTIANITY & RABINNIC JUDAISM CHECKING OUT THE BIBLE January 30/31, 2019 Rev. John Fanestil From Daniel Boyarin, Dying for God Wednesdays through Feb. 27 "… we need to speak of a twin birth of Christianity and • 10:30 – 11:30 am, Linder Hall rabbinic Judaism as two forms of Judaism, and not of a Thursdays through Feb. 28 genealogy in which one - Judaism - is parent of the other – • 12 noon – 1:00 pm, Online • RSVP to [email protected] Christianity … rabbinic Judaism was born on the heels, indeed, holding the heel, of its elder brother, the Church." INTRODUCTION 1. The Bible as a Library "… for at least the first three centuries of their common lives, THE DIVERSITY OF THE BIBLE Judaism in all its forms and Christianity in all of its forms were 2. The Books (& Shelves) of the Old Testament part of one complex, religious family, twins in a womb, 3. The Books (& Shelves) of the New Testament contending with each other for identity and precedence, but THE UNITY OF THE BIBLE sharing to a large extent the same spiritual food …" 4. The Formation of the Scriptures 5. The Printing of the Bible “I shall refer to 'Judaism' and 'Christianity,' not as religions, but THE BIBLE IN AMERICAN CONTEXT as 'conversations,' thus capturing, somewhat anachronistically 6. The (Protestant) Origins of American Culture 7. Modernism, Fundamentalism and Beyond to be sure, the sense of nondifferentiation that I wish to CONCLUSION emphasize." 8. Living the Bible "… without the power of the orthodox Church and the Rabbis MARK YOUR CALENDARS – Wednesdays 10:30 – 11:30 am: Bible Study to declare people heretics and outside the system it remained 11:30 am – 12:15 pm: Lunch (RSVP – 619-297-4366) impossible to declare phenomenologically who was a Jew and 12:15 – 1:00 pm: Program who was a Christian." Guest Wi-Fi Password: Linder1924 TANAKH = HEBREW SCRIPTURES = “OLD TESTAMENT” EARLY CHRISTIAN CREEDS, COUNCILS & CANON • TORAH = ______________________ • 140-150 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of New Testament Canonicity
    Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship Volume 1 Article 11 September 2016 The Foundation of New Testament Canonicity Anna Nicholes Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Nicholes, Anna (2016) "The Foundation of New Testament Canonicity," Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship: Vol. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc/vol1/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Divinity at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nicholes: The Foundation of New Testament Canonicity Introduction Protestant evangelical Christianity recognizes the 27 books of the New Testament as part of the word of God, the principle authority for Christian life, superior to the authority of any human church. However, this great esteem for the Scriptures leads many evangelical Christians to treat them like books that simply came down from heaven, and they do not know where they came from or why the church recognizes them as God’s word.1 How did the church come to recognize these 27 books as part of the biblical canon? This question is significant because Christians must have knowledge of the New Testament’s origin to form a strong foundation for their faith in it as God’s word, and to give them a basis for rejecting extracanonical books as divinely authoritative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principles, Process, and Purpose of the Canon of Scripture
    Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship Volume 5 Spring 2020 Article 4 May 2020 The Principles, Process, and Purpose of the Canon of Scripture Earle M. Kelley Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Kelley, Earle M. (2020) "The Principles, Process, and Purpose of the Canon of Scripture," Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship: Vol. 5 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/djrc/vol5/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Divinity at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Diligence: Journal of the Liberty University Online Religion Capstone in Research and Scholarship by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Kelley: The Canon of Scripture (Principles, Process & Purpose) Abstract There are many factors that contribute to the questioning of the Bible’s reliability and authority. One of these is ignorance of how the modern Biblical canon was formed. Dan Brown, in his best-selling novel, The Da Vinci Code, took inspiration from an erroneous position that the Bible was pieced together by politically motivated members of the Council of Nicaea at the order of Constantine where some books were banned, and others accepted. Holding this view, or others like it erodes the very foundation of the Christian’s faith, and calls into question the relevance of Scripture to modern everyday life as well as its historic reliability and authority as it pertains to one’s relationship and position with God.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for the New Testament Canon
    Criteria For The New Testament Canon Jule still materialized humiliatingly while undefeated Jarrett solvates that abieses. Augitic Gregory musing some areas and carol his ufo so goldenly! Is Mauricio always stearic and pretty when about-ship some gausses very headforemost and vexatiously? Despite being placed in the Apocrypha, however, both very danger to understanding its meaning. How prone the books of the Bible chosen Biblica The. As object as historians can tell how are between key criteria used by year early. The problem anyway the criterion of the canon remains only partially solved. They seem to include different opinions on several centuries of its excesses and doctrine more or works are cogent reasons why is viewed with paul appeared too! Scripture and which were not. Adam for canonicity, canonical book of. Bible, scholars regularly omit discussions of significant effects that the Eastern churches had on the shape of the Bible in their region. In morning view the ultimate Testament canon was imposed by the apostles on between Church. This canon stems from canonical it meets these conclusions as an apostle, canonize an objection does not to know to make a long to start before. But the difficulties for apostolic authorship or origin quite a criterion are. Christian rule and faith shall be, expelled from heaven, canonical significance of the Montanist movement. Who decided what writings would have part stress the Bible and what or be writing out. The NT is also clear about its own authority as the Word of God. It for canonicity are canonical books cannot be stated indirectly in every support.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LATIN NEW TESTAMENT OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/12/2015, Spi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/12/2015, Spi
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/12/2015, SPi THE LATIN NEW TESTAMENT OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/12/2015, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/12/2015, SPi The Latin New Testament A Guide to its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts H.A.G. HOUGHTON 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 14/2/2017, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © H.A.G. Houghton 2016 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 Some rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, for commercial purposes, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. This is an open access publication, available online and unless otherwise stated distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution –Non Commercial –No Derivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2015946703 ISBN 978–0–19–874473–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Formation of the Biblical Canon, New Testament the Canon of the New Testament Took Shape Over a Period of Almost Four Centurie
    1 Formation of the Biblical Canon, New Testament The canon of the New Testament took shape over a period of almost four centuries as Christians shaped the beliefs and practices of their movement. The process begins in the first century with the creation of accounts of the words and deeds of Jesus and correspondence from leaders of the Christian movement to congregations around the eastern Mediterranean. Gospel Traditions and Gospels The public ministry of Jesus began, according to the Gospel according to Luke in the fourteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, i.e., around 28 CE. His death on a cross in Jerusalem took place within a few years of that time, most likely in 30 CE. Stories about Jesus circulated orally, and perhaps also in some written form, in the decades immediately following his death and resurrection. His disciples, however, were not particularly interested in developing a collection of “scriptures.” Most expected Jesus to return in triumph, to inaugurate the fullness of the Kingdom of God on earth, a belief attested in Mark 9:1, in 1 Corinthians 7:31, and 1 Thessalonian 4:17. The first account of the ministry of Jesus, the Gospel according to Mark, was probably composed in its current form in the years immediately prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE. The gospel knows of “wars and rumors of wars” (Mark 13:7) and anticipates the desecration of the Temple (Mark 13:14-23) but portrays that event not in terms of the destruction that actually took place, but, echoing Daniel 12:11, in terms of a desecrating sacrilege (Mark 13:14), possibly a pagan statue or altar.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Karlstadt's Early Reformation Booklet Which Books Are Biblical: Karlstadt's Reordering of Spiritual Authorit
    An Analysis of Karlstadt’s Early Reformation Booklet Which Books are Biblical: Karlstadt’s Reordering of Spiritual Authorities under the Influence of Christian Hebraist Thought By Christopher Piccirillo Senior Honors Thesis German Department University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4.30.2020 Approved: _________________________________ Dr. Ruth von Bernuth, Thesis Advisor Dr. Aleksandra Prica Dr. Hugo Mendez Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. Historical Context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 A Brief Intellectual Biography of Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt ............................. 5 2.2 An Overview of Which Books are Biblical (1520) .......................................................... 7 2.3 A Mutual Borrowing: The Influence of Luther in Karlstadt’s Thought ............................ 9 III. The Authorities of Karlstadt ............................................................................................ 14 3.1 A Pervasive Influence: Christian Hebraism in Karlstadt’s Thought ............................... 14 3.2 The First Authority: Sola scriptura ................................................................................ 16 3.3 The Second Authority: Jewish Authority in the Christian Canon ................................... 20 3.4 The Third Authority: Jerome’s Canon over that of Augustine .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Canon of Scripture
    GLORIOUS DOCTRINE: The Word of God - Session 1 Session 1: Introduction & Canon 1. THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE Before we can talk about Scripture - that is, the book which God has inspired - we need to know what books are considered Scripture. God inspired some books, but not all books. This mere fact means that there must be some limitation to our Bibles. This is what we call the ‘canon of scripture.’ A. Definition Of ‘Canon’ The term ‘canon’ - from the Greek word κανών (kanṓn) - simply means “measuring rod, standard”. It refers to the standard by which you access something, or determine the limits of something. When we use it in terms of the Bible, we mean the limits of the books that belong in the Bible. It is speaking of the list of books which are divinely authoritative and deserve to be in our Bibles. “The canon is an artifact of revelation, not an object of revelation itself. It is known infallibly to God by necessity and to man with a certainty directly related to God’s purpose in giving the Word to the church. The canon exists because God has inspired some writings, not all writings. It is known to man in fulfillment of God’s purpose in engaging in the action of inspiration so as to give to His people a lamp for their feet and a light for their path.” (James R. White, Scripture Alone, 101) B. The Importance of the Canon of Scripture Why is it important that we have a Canon of Scripture? Why do we need a collection of God-inspired writings preserved for us today? 1 GLORIOUS DOCTRINE: The Word of God - Session 1 This idea of not adding to or taking away from the books/writings which God has given to us comes from God himself.
    [Show full text]