DOCSLIB.ORG

The Social Philosophy of Gillian Rose: Speculative Diremptions, Absolute Ethical Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Social Philosophy of Gillian Rose: Speculative Diremptions, Absolute Ethical Life Durham E-Theses The Social Philosophy of Gillian Rose: Speculative Diremptions, Absolute Ethical Life BROWER-LATZ, ANDREW,PHILLIP How to cite: BROWER-LATZ, ANDREW,PHILLIP (2015) The Social Philosophy of Gillian Rose: Speculative Diremptions, Absolute Ethical Life, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11302/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The Social Philosophy of Gillian Rose: Speculative Diremptions, Absolute Ethical Life by Andrew Brower Latz Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theology and Religion Durham University 2015 ii Abstract This thesis provides an original reconstruction of Gillian Rose’s work as a distinctive social philosophy within the Frankfurt School tradition that holds together the methodological, logical, descriptive, metaphysical and normative moments of social theory; provides a critical theory of modern society; and offers distinctive versions of ideology critique based on the history of jurisprudence, and mutual recognition based on a Hegelian view of appropriation. Rose’s philosophy integrates three key moments of the Frankfurt tradition: a view of the social totality as both an epistemological necessity and normative ideal; a philosophy that is its own metaphilosophy because it integrates its own logical and social preconditions within itself; and a critical analysis of modern society that is simultaneously a critique of social theory. Rose’s work is original in the way it organises these three moments around absolute ethical life as the social totality, its Hegelian basis, and its metaphysical focus on law and jurisprudence. Rose’s Hegelian philosophy includes an account of reason that is both social and logical without reducing philosophy to the sociology of knowledge, thereby steering between dogmatism and relativism. Central to this position are the historically developing nature of rationality and knowing, and an account of the nature of explanation as depending on a necessarily and necessarily imperfectly posited totality. No totality is ever fully attained but is brought to view through the Hegelian-speculative exposition of history, dirempted experience, and the tensions immanent to social theories. Rose explored one main social totality within her social philosophy – absolute ethical life – as the implied unity of law and ethics, and of finite and infinite. This enables a critique simultaneously and immanently of society and social philosophy in three ways. First, of both the social form of bourgeois property law and social contract theories reflective of it. Second, of social theorising that insufficiently appreciates its jurisprudential determinations and/or attempts to eliminate metaphysics. Third, the broken middle shows the state-civil society and the law-ethics diremptions as two fundamental features of modern society and as frequently unacknowledged influences on social theorising. iii Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….ii Contents……………………………………………………………………………........iii Abbreviations…………………………………………….…………………………......vi Declaration……………………………………………………………………………..vii Statement of Copyright………………………………………………………………...vii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………viii Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….1 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..1 2 Rose’s life and work………………………………………………………………….4 3 Interpretations of Rose……………………………………………………………….7 4 Outline of the argument……………………………………………….……………15 Chapter 1 Rose’s Hegelianism……………………………………………………………………19 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………19 2 Situating Rose’s Hegelianism……………………………………………………….23 3 The nature and scope of the argument in Hegel Contra Sociology…………………30 3.1 Hegel Contra Sociology in itself……………………………………………..…30 3.2 Is Hegel contra sociology? Rose’s critique of classical and critical social theory…………………………………………………………………………...34 3.2.1 Classical social theory…………………………………………….………..34 3.2.2 Frankfurt School social theory……………………………………………..47 4 The substance of Rose’s Hegelianism……………………………………………….53 4.1 Phenomenology……………………………………….………………………...56 4.2 Triune rationality………………………………………………………………..64 4.3 Speculative propositions………………………………………………………...76 5 Double critique and implied totality………………………………………………...79 5.1 A simultaneous critique of society and social philosophy……………………...80 5.2 Absolute ethical life……………………………………………………………..85 6 Objections…………………………………………………………………………...91 6.1 Political economy and substantive theory………………………………………92 6.2 Vagueness…………………………………………………………………….....94 iv 7 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………99 Chapter 2 Rose’s Frankfurt Inheritance……………….….……………………...……………102 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..102 2 Rose and Bernstein: aporetic ontology, philosophical modernism………………..103 3 Self-limiting reason………………………………………………………………..106 4 Social totality………………………………………………………………………110 5 ‘From Speculative to Dialectical Thinking’……………………………………….117 6 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………121 Chapter 3 Jurisprudential Wisdom…………………………………………………………….123 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..123 2 The ‘speculative identity of form and history’……………………….....................124 2.1 The ‘antinomy of law’…………………………………………………………124 2.2 The argument of Dialectic of Nihilism ………………………………………...127 2.3 The post-Kantian condition……………………………………………………133 3 Ideology critique via jurisprudence: Kant and Roman law……..…………………135 3.1 An elective affinity…………………………………………………………….135 3.2 Kantian rationality and the person/thing distinction…………………………..138 3.3 The usucapio defence of freedom……………………………………………..140 3.4 Freedom and private law………………………………………………………143 4 Jurisprudential wisdom…………………………………………………………….148 4.1 The legal formalism charge……………………………………………………149 4.2 Jurisprudential wisdom and social philosophy………………………………...152 5 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………161 Chapter 4 The Broken Middle…………………………………………………………………..163 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..163 2 The broken middle…………………………………………………………………164 2.1 A ‘phenomenology of modern theory’ and society……………………………166 2.2 The state-civil society diremption...…………………………………………...171 2.3 The law-ethics diremption……………………………………………………..183 v 2.3.1 New ethics and the spirit of postmodernism……………………………...188 2.3.2 The equivocation and suspension of the ethical…………………………..194 3 Politics between moralism and realism……………………………………………200 3.1 Mutual recognition and Hegelian phenomenological reconstruction...………..203 4 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………212 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………215 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………….224 vi Abbreviations Works by Gillian Rose TMS The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno (1978) HCS Hegel Contra Sociology (1981) DN Dialectic of Nihilism: Post-Structuralism and Law (1984) BM The Broken Middle: Out of Our Ancient Society (1992) JAM Judaism and Modernity: Philosophical Essays (1993) LW Love’s Work: A Reckoning With Life (1995) MBL Mourning Becomes the Law: Philosophy and Representation (1996) P Paradiso (1999) Works by Hegel PhR Philosophy of Right PhSp Phenomenology of Spirit EL Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Science, Part 1 Logic SL Science of Logic vii Declaration This thesis has been submitted to Durham University in accordance with the regulations for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. It is my own work and no part of it has been previously submitted for a degree in the University of Durham or any other university. Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author’s prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. viii Acknowledgements I gratefully acknowledge the Arts and Humanities Research Council for funding this research. I am delighted to be able to express my gratitude and debt to Prof. Christopher Insole and Dr. Marcus Pound, my excellent supervisors. A more complementary pair of Doktorväter – in temperament, inclination and specialisation – is difficult to imagine. This work owes a great deal to their patient direction, wise advice and insightful criticisms. For conversations about Rose and/or comments on draft sections of the thesis I am grateful to Keith Ansell-Pearson, Anthony Bash, Nick Brindley, Thom Brooks, Derek Brower, Deirdre Brower Latz, Robert Fine, Josh Furnal, David Held, Nik Howard, Wayne Hudson, Owen Hulatt, Stephen Houlgate, Kimberly Hutchings, Simon Jarvis, Anthony Jensen, Vincent Lloyd, Sebastian Luft, Thomas Lynch, Wayne Martin, Hermínio Martins, John Milbank, Brian O’Connor, Maggie O’Neill, Peter Osborne, Charlie Pemberton, William Rasch, Anna Rowlands, Andrew Shanks, Nigel Tubbs and Rowan Williams. I thank Diarmuid ÓNéill for financial support and general encouragement. I have benefited from the assistance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists By
    Review Reviewed Work(s): Self-consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists by Simon LUMSDEN Review by: Michael Baur Source: The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 69, No. 2 (DECEMBER 2015), pp. 395-397 Published by: Philosophy Education Society Inc. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636496 Accessed: 21-10-2019 12:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Philosophy Education Society Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Metaphysics This content downloaded from 150.108.161.119 on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:56:09 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms SUMMARIES AND COMMENTS 395 these other philosophers more clearly than they did themselves. What is more, he also develops those ideas further than anyone else I can think of, adding his own insights as he goes along. The result is a coherent and compelling defense of second-orderism. I would certainly recommend this book to any philosopher interested in ontological commitment or second-order logic, and given its clarity, I would recommend Part II to students as well. —Robert Trueman, Robinson College, Cambridge LUMSDEN, Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Gillian Rose: a Good Enough Justice
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2013/08/27/book-review-gillian-rose-a-good-enough-justice/ Book Review: Gillian Rose: A Good Enough Justice Blog Admin Kate Schick makes the case for the rediscovery of British philosopher Gillian Rose’s unique but neglected voice. Engaging with the work of Benjamin, Honig, Zizek and Butler, she locates Rose’s ideas within central debates in contemporary social theory: trauma and memory, exclusion and difference, tragedy and messianic utopia. Liane Hartnett finds that this work is a compelling invitation to read more Rose. Gillian Rose: A Good Enough Justice. Kate Schick. Edinburgh University Press. July 2012. Find this book: Gillian Rose (1947-1995) was a Jewish thinker and British Hegelian. Educated at Oxf ord, Rose was a reader at the University of Sussex f or many years bef ore accepting a Chair of Social and Political Thought at the University of Warwick. She was also an advisor to the Polish Commission f or the Future of Auschwitz. Rose is perhaps best known f or her moving philosophical memoir, Love’s Work, which was written when she was dying of ovarian cancer. However, Rose also wrote on a wide range of topics including philosophy, sociology and f aith. Her major works include The Melancholy Science, Hegel Contra Sociology, The Dialectic of Nihilism, Broken Middle, Judaism and Modernity and Mourning Becomes the Law. Rose’s thought has inf luenced theologians, philosophers and poets: people like Rowan Williams, John Milbank, Slavoj Zizek and Geof f rey Hill. Yet, she remains a largely neglected philosopher.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Persistence of the Genealogical in Contemporary Theology
    On the Persistence of the Genealogical in Contemporary Theology Abstract There is a persistence of genealogical discourse in a certain strand of contemporary theology. Opting for the genealogical shapes the theological task of remembrance and engagement with the historical tradition in important, but also problematic ways. In this article I discuss how genealogical discourse was appropriated by theology, and then uncover its implicit assumptions and tendencies. Analysing some encounters between theological genealogies and various Hegelian thinkers, I draw a contrast between Nietzschean genealogy and Hegelian ‘phenomenology’. This comparison brings to light some fundamental ways in which the genealogical might distort theological writing and practice. Word count: 10634. It is very easy to forget; even easier to remember wrongly. For theologians whose work involves remembering well, this fact might induce in us a combination of mourning and regret. Much is unintentionally lost to time, yet even more is wittingly let go in a deceitful attempt to cover up our tracks. The theological task must involve a keen attention to what we remember, how we so often run from our memories, and, importantly, the ways in which remembering takes place. Acts of remembrance are intertwined with their objects, and a critique of our practices of remembrance must involve considering the complexity of these relationships. In The Anatomy of Misremembering: Von Balthasar’s Response to Philosophical Modernity, Cyril O’Regan draws attention to the importance of remembering rightly. 1 O’Regan is concerned with a certain ‘misremembering’ in modern thought, such that things are not merely displaced and forgotten, but seriously misconstrued—deliberately or not.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December
    ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December Postgraduate/Early Career Researcher Day: 356 North Wing, Arts West 12.30-1.00 Registration 1.00-2.00 Grant adventures: The ups and downs of the grant process Knox Peden Christopher Mayes Louise Richardson-Self 2.00-3.00 Afternoon Tea 3.00-4.00 Philosophy pathways: What you can do and how you can get there Jack Reynolds Ross Barham Rachel Joy 4.00-4.30 Break 4.30-5.30 Publishing without perishing: Publication tips Marguerite La Caze Andrew Inkpin Daniel Lopez Public Lecture B117 Glyn Davies Building/Melbourne School of Design (free, no registrations required) 7.30-8.30 Martin Hägglund This Life: Why Mortality Makes Us Free ASCP 2019 Program – Wednesday 4 December 8.15-8.45 Registration 8.45-10.30 Welcome to Country: Aunty Di. Conference Opening: Prof. Margaret Cameron (Head of School, SHAPS, University of Melbourne) Keynote ‐ Rebecca Comay, ‘Deadlines (literally)’ 10.30-11.00 Morning Tea Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 9 Room 10 11.00-12.30 Thematic Panel: Thematic Panel: Janice Richardson Anya Daly John Cleary What Joeri Mol Leonard D’Cruz Steven Churchill “It is George Duke Book Panel: Jon Religion and the Hegel and French Spinoza, Locke, and The Declaration of is an Idea? Plato's Organizing Space: The Methodological stupid to confuse the Political Romanticism Roffe, ed., The Limits of Reason in Philosophy the Influence Industry Interdependence!: theory of Subjectivity and the Significance of moral and the Works of Gilles the Early and Late Feminism, grounding participation
    [Show full text]
  • International Philosophical Quarterly
    International Philosophical Quarterly VOL. XL, No. 1 Issue No. 157 March 2000 ARTICLES Presenting Our Authors 3 Demons, Psychopaths, and the Formation of Consciences Hayden Ramsay 5 Anne Conway's Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes Jennifer McRobert 21 Neither Deconstruction nor Reconstruction: Metaphysics and the Intimate Strangeness of Being William Desmond 37 Dasein Comes after the Episternic Subject, But Who Is Dasein? Mariana Ortega 51 Reading, Imagination, and Interpretation: A Ricoeurian Response Mark S. Muldoon 69 A Subject for Hegel's Logic Simon Lumsden 85 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Galen, On Antecedent Causes-ed. and trans. R. J. Hankinson Robert J Penella 101 What We Owe to Each Other-T. M. Scanlon Peter Vallentyne 102 Puzzles for the Will: Fatalism, Newcomb and Samarra, Determinism and Omniscience-Jordan Howard Sobel Bruce A. Aune 103 The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson- ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn Dorothy Grover 105 Plato's Sophist-Martin Heidegger Daniel R. Ahem 107 Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves-Rae Langton David Carr 109 Dispositions-Stephen Mumford Rom Harre 110 (cont' d.) Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg Dilemma-Ernest Gellner H. 0. Mounce 112 Mind in Action-Bede Rundle David R. Cerbone 114 Providence and the Problem of Evil­ Richard Swinburne W. Matthews Grant 115 An Introduction to African Philosophy- Samuel Oluoch Imbo F. Ochieng-Odhiambo 117 Plato's Dream of Sophistry-Richard Marback Giles Hibbert, O. P. 120 Method in Ancient Philosophy-ed. Jyl Gentzler Daryl M. Tress 121 Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory- John Finnis James C. Doig 123 Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett-ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 11 2011 Parrhesia Number 11 • 2011 • 1-34
    PARRHESIA WWW.PARRHESIAJOURNAL.ORG ISSUE 11 2011 PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 • 2011 • 1-34 THE WORK AND THE IDEA Miguel de Beistegui Editorial Note. The text presented here is the first chapter of an upcoming book by the author. The editorial board would like to thank Professor de Beistegui for allowing us to publish it here; our thanks also go to Robert Sinnerbrink for facilitating its publication. INTRODUCTION This book attempts to show that it is through the recognition of what I call the hypersensible, and the work of metaphor, that art comes into its own, and is able to twist free of metaphysical aesthetics, rooted in the ontology of identity and governed by the laws of imitation. By “hypersensible” I mean a dimension that escapes the classical distinction and the space that stretches between the sensible and the supersensible, matter and form, or the image and the original. In a nutshell, the hypersensible designates the excess of the sensible within the sensible, and the genuine matter of art. As such, it escapes any straightforward materialism, as well as any form of idealism, or spiritualism. It could be characterised as hyletics. For reasons that I will clarify later on, I prefer to refer to it as an aesthetics of metaphor, or a metaphoric. Why metaphor? Simply because, twisting free of its own, deeply entrenched metaphysical interpretation, metaphor can be seen as the image or trope, applicable to art in general, which reveals the excess of the sensible in the sensible, or the way in which any given image is virtually more than it actually is.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Representation in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 11-2017 The perversion of the absolute: religion and representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit Thomas Floyd Wright DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Wright, Thomas Floyd, "The perversion of the absolute: religion and representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit" (2017). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 240. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/240 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PERVERSION OF THE ABSOLUTE Religion and Representation in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2017 BY Thomas Floyd Wright Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hegel contra Theology . 1 1.2 Marx, Ante-Hegel . 5 1.3 Hegel, post Hegel mortum . 11 1.4 Speculation and perversion . 16 2 The perversion of identity 22 2.1 The evil of ontotheology . 22 2.2 The perversion of desire: Augustine . 26 2.3 The perversion of speech: Hobbes . 30 2.4 The perversion of reason: Kant .
    [Show full text]
  • Hermann Cohen - Kant Among the Prophets1
    The Journal ofJewish Thought and Philosphy, Vol. 2, pp. 185-199 © 1993 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by licence only Hermann Cohen - Kant among the Prophets1 Gillian Rose University of Warwick, UK The selective reception by general philosophy and social scientific methodology in the European tradition of the mode of neo- Kantianism founded by Hermann Cohen (1842-1918) has con- tributed to the widespread undermining of conceptual thinking in favour of the hermeneutics of reading. To assess Cohen's thought as a reading and re-originating of the Jewish tradition involves a predicament of circularity: for the question of reading and origin is not neutral but derives from the partial reception of the object addressed. The task of reassessment changes from a methodologi- cally independent survey to a challenge posed by current thought, unsure of its modernity or post-modernity, to re-establish contact with a formative but long-forgotten part of itself. No longer solely academic, this exercise will have to confront two especially difficult aspects of Cohen's thought. First, he did not "read" Kant, he destroyed the Kantian philosophy. In its place, he founded a "neo- Kantianism" on the basis of a logic of origin, dif- ference and repetition. As a logic of validity, this neo-Kantian math- esis is often at stake when its practitioners prefer to acknowledge 1 This paper was originally prepared for the Symposium, "The Playground of Textuality: Modern Jewish Intellectuals and the Horizon of Interpretation," First Annual Wayne State University Press Jewish Symposium, held in Detroit, 20-22 March, 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Paraethical: Gillian Rose and Political Nihilism Gillian Rose, As A
    JOHN MILBANK On the Paraethical: Gillian Rose and Political Nihilism Gillian Rose, as a strict Hegelian, was a thinker of the primacy of the political. From the beginning to the end of her remarkable oeuvre, she targets remorselessly the dangerous self-deceit of those who try to think away this primacy – in favour of the alternative primacy of the social, the ethical, the individual, the linguistic or the religious. Human life is fundamentally and overwhelmingly political, and this means that it is based at once in the violent imposition of the power of some human beings over others, and in a claim for the legitimacy of this power. There is force and there is law: they are not identical to each other, but they assume each other. Violence is at once external and internal to law; law is at once internal and external to violence. Law intrudes an ideal dimension, but if we imagine that this is completely self-commanding and free of arbitrary presuppositions, then we sink into an apolitical morality which is an illusion. Conversely, if we imagine that there is there is an entirely material social process, originally free of self- justification, then we also delude ourselves; human temporal existence is problematically caught between the real and the ideal1. And what is more, these two overly abstract ways of conceiving the historical process are collusive: the more that Marxism imagines mere material determination, then the more it also nurtures the “Fichtean” and ultimately utopian fantasy of an imposition of an ideal order out of a whole spiritual cloth upon an essentially obedient material substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY January
    Annual Report INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY January - November 2016 Editorial Team: Editors in Chief: Jef Huysmans (Queen Mary, University of London, UK) João Pontes Nogueira (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) Associate Editors: Pinar Bilgin (Bilkent University, Turkey) Roxanne Doty (Arizona State University, USA) Anna Leander (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark) Nicholas Onuf (Florida International University, USA) Prem Kumar Rajaram (Central European University, Hungary) Mark B. Salter (University of Ottawa, Canada) Karen Smith (University of Cape Town, South Africa) Laurent Bonelli (Université Paris X, France) Assistant Editor: Renata Summa (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) Language Editor: Liz Vidler (Open University, UK) 1 Table of Content INTRODUCTION. ............................................................................................................................. 3 TRANSITION TO OUP..….………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………4 FROM FORUM TO COLLECTIVE DISCUSSION PIECES………… …………… …………………………………..…….……...4 CONTENT MANAGEMENT - OUP 2016………………………………………..……………………………………………….5 - Publication Year by Year (calendar days) and publication details ........................................... 6 - Citation Ranking and Impact Factor ........................................................................................ 6 - Downloads and Website Traffic ............................................................................................... 7 EDITORIAL PROCESS - 2016 IN
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49469-4 — Women's International Thought: A New History Edited by Patricia Owens , Katharina Rietzler Frontmatter More Information Women’s International Thought: A New History Women’s International Thought: A New History is the first cross- disciplinary history of women’s international thought. Bringing together some of the foremost historians and scholars of international relations working today, this book recovers and analyzes the path-breaking work of eighteen leading thinkers of international politics from the early to mid-twentieth century. Recovering and analyzing this important work, the essays offer revisionist accounts of IR’s intellectual and disciplinary history and expand the locations, genres, and practices of international thinking. Systematically structured, and focusing in particular on Black diasporic, Anglo-American, and European historical women, it does more than “add women” to the existing intellectual and disciplinary histories from which they were erased. Instead, it raises fundamental questions about which kinds of subjects and what kind of thinking constitutes international thought, opening new vistas to scholars and students of international history and theory, intellectual history and women’s and gender studies. patricia owens is Professor of International Relations and Fellow of Somerville College at the University of Oxford. Her previous publica- tions include Economy of Force (2015), winner of BISA’s Susan Strange Prize, Between War and Politics (2007) and co-editor of The Globalization of World Politics (2020). She is a former fellow of the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study and Proctor Fellow at Princeton University. katharina rietzler is Lecturer in American History at the Univer- sity of Sussex.
    [Show full text]
  • German Idealism by Espen Hammer
    GERMAN IDEALISM German Idealism is one of the most important movements in the history of philosophy. It is also increasingly acknowledged to contain the seeds of many current philosophical issues and debates. This outstanding collection of spe- cially commissioned chapters examines German idealism from several angles and assesses the renewed interest in the subject from a wide range of fields. Including discussions of the key representatives of German idealism such as Kant, Fichte and Hegel, it is structured in clear sections dealing with: metaphysics the legacy of Hegel’s philosophy Brandom and Hegel recognition and agency autonomy and nature the philosophy of German romanticism Amongst other important topics, German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives addresses the debates surrounding the metaphysical and epistemological legacy of German idealism; its importance for understanding recent debates in moral and political thought; its appropriation in recent theories of language and the relationship between mind and world; and how German idealism affected sub- sequent movements such as romanticism, pragmatism, and critical theory. Contributors: Frederick Beiser, Jay Bernstein, Andrew Bowie, Richard Eldridge, Manfred Frank, Paul Franks, Sebastian Gardner, Espen Hammer, Stephen Houlgate, Terry Pinkard, Robert Pippin, Paul Redding, Fred Rush, Robert Stern. Espen Hammer is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oslo and a Reader in Philosophy at the University of Essex. He is the author of Adorno and the Political (Routledge, 2006). GERMAN IDEALISM Contemporary Perspectives Edited by Espen Hammer First published 2007 by Routledge 2 Milton Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2007.
    [Show full text]