<<

International Journal of Paleobiology & Paleontology ISSN: 2642-1283 MEDWIN PUBLISHERS Committed to Create Value for researchers

The Marine Foraminifera

Ishita D* Editorial Department of Geology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India Volume 3 Issue 1

Received Date: March 21, 2020 *Corresponding author: Ishita Das, Department of Geology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, Published Date: June 02, 2020 India, Email: [email protected]

The marine protist foraminifera have become a very of a revolution in the investigation of trace elements in important tool in palaeoenvironmental analysis. Foraminifera Foraminifera, and knowledge in this area is increasing rapidly. are organisms belonging to a of amoeboid Culturing of live individuals has also played an important role that are characterized by streaming granular in this development, because the potential usefulness for catching prey and they are commonly protected by an external shell. The external shell can be made up of varied Oceanographers broadly group elemental behaviour in the material although the most common material is calcium oceanof trace according elements to can the be biogeochemical verified directly cycling by experimentation. of the elements carbonate. Some species have an agglutinated where in the ocean: [1] ‘nutrient’ proxies such as Cd, Ba and Zn the organism constructs its test or shell from the sediment which provide information on seawater nutrient, carbon and particles surrounding it. Foraminifera usually have two types carbonate levels. They show large and systematic variations of habits – benthic or planktic. The benthic foraminifera in their seawater chemistry due to their involvement in may adapt to live on sediment-water interface (epifaunal) biological cycling; [2] ‘physical’ proxies such as Mg, Sr, F and or in the sediment at various depths (infaunal). A number of benthic foraminiferal families have infaunal representatives, such as temperature and pressure. The ratio of conservative including Buliminidae, Uvigerinidae, Bolivinidae and B isotopes, which dominantly reflect physical parameters Nodosaridae. These foraminifera tolerate different levels the three groups, conservative elements have the longest of oxygenation as well as incorporate different proportions elements to Ca is nearly fixed in seawater, and among of trace elements and consequently the proportion of V, Sr, and Nd isotopes, which provide diverse information on epifaunal and infaunal foraminiferal morphotypes are theoceanic history residence of ocean times; chemistry; [3] ‘chemical’ and [4-6] proxies ‘diagenetic’ such asproxies Li, U, useful in estimation of the degree of oxygenation as well as palaeoclimate interpretations. The living infaunal processes. Particle reactive elements are rapidly cycled and havesuch typically as Mn, short which oceanic reflect residence secondary times. post-depositional Naturally, there need to be generated to know the infaunal microhabitat of is some overlap among these broad groups, but the divisions theassemblage species. can be studied directly in the field but proxies are a helpful way to view the toolbox of elemental proxies available to the paleoceanographer [7,8]. Geochemical proxies may be reliable indicator of References the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) also decreases below theoxygenation sediment levels.water Theinterface. carbon Similarly isotopic such ratio trends (δ13 can C) be of 1. Banerjee K, Senthilkumar B, Purvaja R and Ramesh observed in the trace element signatures of the foraminiferal R (2012) Sedimentation and trace metal distribution tests and can be used for interpreting climate, nutrient in selected locations of Sundarbans mangroves and and water composition. Therefore the indicator stable Hooghly estuary, Northeast coast of India. Environ isotopic composition as well as trace elements of the foraminiferal tests has the potential application in inferring 2. Bhalla SN, Khare N, Shanmukha DH, Henriques PJ (2007) the microhabitats of fossil foraminifera and the redox Geochem Health 34: 27-42. Foraminiferal studies in nearshore regions of western condition of the ambient environment.

Trace elements in Foraminifera are no longer just a coast of India and Laccadives Islands: A review. Indian curiosity but have become a unique tool to understand the JournalBradshaw of Marine JS, Environmental Sciences. 36(4): Parameters 272-287. and Marsh past. Scientists all over the world are currently in the midst 3. Foraminifera. 13(1): 26-38. The Marine Protist Foraminifera Int J Paleobiol Paleontol 2 International Journal of Paleobiology & Paleontology

4. Dey M, Ganguly D, Chowdhury C, Majumder N, Jana TK of Bengal, India. 62(1-2): 9-21. (2012) Intra-Annual Variation of Modern Foraminiferal Assemblage in a Tropical Mangrove Ecosystem in India. 7. (2008) Response of benthic foraminifera Rosalina leei toNigam different R, Kurtarkar temperature SR, Saraswat and salinity, R, Linshy under VN, laboratory Rana SS 5. WetlandsGhosh A, Biswas 32: 813-826. S, Barman P (2014) Marsh Foraminiferal culture experiment. 88(4): 699-704. Assemblages in Relation to Vegetation in Sunderban, India. Journal Geological Society of India. 84: 657-667. 8. (2005) Intertidal mangrove foraminifera from the 6. Mukhopadhyay SK, Biswas H, De TK, Jana TK (2006) CentralWoodroffe Great SA, Barrier Horton Reef BP, Shelf, Larcombe Australia: P, Whittaker Implications JE Fluxes of nutrients from the tropical River Hooghly at the land-ocean boundary of Sunderbans, NE Coast of Bay for Sea-Level Reconstruction. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 35(3): 259-270.

Ishita D. The Marine Protist Foraminifera. Int J Paleobiol Paleontol 2020, 3(1): 000112. Copyright© Ishita D.