Amundsen: Cheated & Uncheated
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 10 2000 January ISSN 10415440 DIO The International Journal of Scientific History Triple Issue: Copublished with the University of Cambridge Amundsen: Cheated & Uncheated R.AmundsenO.Wisting First at EACH Pole Byrd North Pole Claim's Burial Slides from Decent to Indecent Bernt Balchen's Air DoublePriority & Skepticism Finally Vindicated Byrd's Courage & Navigational Pioneering Merit Admiration Nonetheless 2 2000 January DIO-J.HA 10 2000 January DIO-J.HA 10 3 DIO & The Journal for Hysterical Astronomy: List of Figures Page: 1 National Geographic's Official Diagram of Byrd's Alleged 1926/5/9 Path . 10 DIO's Byrd Report: CoPublished with The Polar Record 2 Byrd's Initial Version of His FlightPath . 11 Table of Contents Page: 3 Byrd's Frantic 1926/5/9 Diary Record: OilLeak Discovered . 18 4 The 1st Sextant Shot, Diary Page 8 . 28 News Notes & Amundsen's Preeminence 3 5 The 2nd Sextant Shot, Diary Page 11 . 30 History of DIO Report & Summary of US Geography's Triple North Pole Hoax 4 6 Loose Sheet of Calculations in Byrd's Hand . 33 The “National” “Geographic” “Society” & Real Geographical Societies' Snickers 6 7 From Initial [a] & Final [b] Reports: 7:07 Sextant Data Discussion . 34 Preface: DIO, Byrd, & the “North Pole” Diary 7 8 From PostFlight “FlightChart”: Detail Lower Right Corner . 35 xA Introduction 9 9 Bizarre Skyward Map, as Used by OSU & Mercator's World . 56 xB Historical Upshot 13 10 Two Genuine North Pole Discoverers . 61 xC Byrd's Various Alleged Speeds: Tied Up in Knots? or Pure Bosch? 17 11 Portney's Smart Tornado (Dorothy & Toto Should Have Been So Lucky) . 72 xD Published Sextant Data (Official Typescript) 22 12 Portney's 1973 Diagram of Byrd's Purported Path & Error Zone . 74 xE LongSecreted Actual 1926 Sextant Data (InFlight Diary) 26 13 Portney's 1992 Diagram of Byrd's Purported Path & Error Zone . 75 xF Proof of Fabrication Procedure in the 1926 Byrd Data 32 xG Precision Anomalies 38 News Notes & Amundsen's Preeminence xH Sumner StraightlineJacket 42 [On 2000/12/8, the two leading investigators of polar hoaxes, Robert Bryce and DR, xI How Far North Did the Airplane Get? 43 appeared together on the History Channel, celebrating the 1st national recognition of xJ How Far North Could Byrd & Bennett See? 45 experts' nownearunanimous though hithertoprivate opinion: Roald Amundsen's priority xK Temporal Bookends 48 at each geographical pole. The program made known to the public at last the horrific xL How an OSUPromoted Expert Works Backwards to an Answer 50 injustice done to Amundsen by the establishment of his day, who had so damned and exiled xM Superswift Flying & Certifying 55 him that he was by now all but forgotten by the US public.] xN Summing up the 1926 Evidence 59 xO Appendix 1. Reconstructing Actual DeadReckoning & 9:15 Stress 62 To put it simply: once one clears away the alsorans and the hoaxers, Amundsen's xP Appendix 2. Restoring the Diary's Flawed 1925 Sextant Sights 65 record of priorities exceeds that of all other polar explorers combined. He was: xQ Appendix 3. Ohio State University: Neutral? Or for the Byrds? 66 1. First to winter in the Antarctic. xR Addendum 1: AmericanExperience, PBS, and Fraud 69 2. First through the Northwest Passage. xS Addendum 2: Portney's Complaints 70 3. First to the South Pole. xT Addendum 3: It Ain't Over 'Til the FatCat Sings 76 4. First circumnavigator of the Arctic Ocean. 1 In Which the Byrd Center Does Some Erasing of Its Own . 81 5. First to the North Pole. 2 The Undropped FlagBlizzard 82 6. First to the Ice Pole (the Arctic Ocean point farthest from landmasses). 3 NP Fictional Productions 84 7. First to cross the Arctic Ocean. 4 DriftIndicator: Aim vs Distance 86 8. First polar explorer to die attempting to save the life of an enemy (xA10). 5 Byrd's Scientific Equipment and National Geographic's Exam 87 6 OSU Expert vs OSU Expert 88 [On 2001/5/12, Reuters' A. Doyle reported live at 1:25, from over the North Pole, that 7 Unsteady Heights & Byrd's Suppressions of Them 89 a group of celebrants were popping corks to toast Roald Amundsen's priority there exactly y 8 SteeringMysteries & Open Options 91 75 earlier, when he radioed (“live”) his attainment to the world. The 2001 group had been 9 The Loose Sheet of Figures: MidFabrication in MidOcean 92 flown to the Pole by the Norsk Polarinstitut, accompanied by its director, Olav Orheim. 10 Speculative Reconstructions of Some Marvellously Agreeable Fakes 93 The History Channel and Norsk Polarinstitut events vindicated not only Amundsen but 11 The “Splendid Check” 93 also DR's 1973 book, Peary at the North Pole: Fact or Fiction?, which (at its p.280) had 12 Verlegen Hook, Misreadings, & Ungenerous Apologists 94 been the first ever to publish — nearly three decades earlier — the fact that all three prior 13 Velikovsky Lives! — How Cults Eliminate Contradictions 96 claims to the N.Pole were fakes, thus, Amundsen was first there. Given the inexcusably 14 In Which Goerler Forgets the Day He Was Famous 97 glacial slowness with which establishments accept any truth upsetting to money, I am 15 Another OSUPromoted Expert Wrestles with Numbers 98 extremely fortunate to have lived to see the truth of Amundsen's unique greatness finally 16 TimeFudgeEmulation & Byrd at 1 Mile/Hour 98 come to permanent worldwide light. 17 Can Leashed Judges Leash a Rampaging ApprovalOrgy? 99 As a naturally happy sort, I've not personally been very directly hurt by the delay. 18 In Which Byrd's Defenders Juice Him Up to 130 Miles/Hour 101 But I regret that genuine North Pole discoverers Roald Amundsen, Lincoln Ellsworth, & 19 Odd Hominems: the Fruits & the Fates 102 Umberto Nobile and their closest family (as also my parents) could not fully share in this 20 FlameKeepers vs Scholars: Why Are Outsiders Making the Analytic Finds? 103 exquisite moment of justice (though Nobile's widow survived long enough to know the 21 Nuts, Sluts, Grosvenors, & Clones 104 1996/5/9 death of Byrd's fake claim), which we owe to the perception and the historical Conventions 105 equitysense of Jessica Louchheim, Jonathan Grupper, and the History Channel. References & Abbreviations 106 Thanks are also due to the news reporters who carried the uphill fight against Byrd's hoax over the years: Jim Bready, C.B.Allen, R.Montague, Nicholas Wade, & John Wilford.] 4 2000 January DIO-J.HA 10 2000 January DIO-J.HA 10 5 History of the DIO Report unquestioned national recognition, complete with yet another perfunctory “exam” by bad & Summary of US Geography's Triple North Pole Hoax oldreliable National Geographic. (Which triggered the only Congressional Medals of Honor in history which are definitely known to have been fraudulently obtained: Byrd & This issue of DIO is devoted to publication at last of DR's wellknown 1996/5/4 report Bennett 1926 December: G 135. This item in particular has caused Rob't Bryce to regard to the Byrd Polar Research Center at Ohio State University, a report that was put together in DIO's treatment of Byrd as insufficiently severe.) For details of causal interrelations during roughly 10 days and was the acknowledged basis of the 1996/5/9 pageone New York Times this veritable cascade of fraud, see, e.g., xM2, xT14, 5, 21. Note: the US' venerable story which courageously undid that newspaper's own 1926/5/10 pageone acceptance of geographical institution, the American Geographical Society (though it awarded Peary high Richard Byrd's “North Pole” flight of the previous day. honors for the mostly genuine accomplishments of his great 18981902 expedition) never At the dawn of what we hope will be a more open and enlightened millennium, the fell for any of the clumsy fakes just cited — nor did any Scandinavian geographical society. bettermatured version of the report is now being simultaneously published by the leading (Peary's most undeniable explorationhoax — more blatant than even his ridiculous 1906 polar journal of the world, The Polar Record, journal of the University of Cambridge's April “Farthest North” — was his nonexistent 1906 June “Crocker Land”. See fn 66. The renowned Scott Polar Research Institute — and here, in subsequentlymuchexpanded (and evidences on both of these frauds are fully discussed at DIO 1.1 z4 xB.) partly popularized) form, by DIO. (The greater size of the DIO version is merely due to But the responsibility is not just NGS' because early20thcentury organized US geog DR's inability to letalone an article during the period between SPRI's deadline and our raphy (being on rather few university campuses) was then too unsure of its academic status publication. Absolutely no censorship — explicit or implicit — was applied by SPRI Editor to risk investigating its community's potential embarrassments. Sir Martin Lindsay, who Beau Riffenburgh.) had in 1934 led what was then the longest selfsupporting journey in arctic history, later The Cambridge publication concludes with a note explaining that, while doublepub (The Times of London, 1977/11/6) ticked off the secrets which polar experts had carried lication is unusual, the Byrd report “is considered to be of such significance to the polar privately for decades: “Scott was not a great explorer . Shackleton tended to bound and community that it has been published here despite an expanded version being published to booze.