DOCSLIB.ORG

De La Convention Sur Les Privilèges Et Immunités Des Nations Unies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
De La Convention Sur Les Privilèges Et Immunités Des Nations Unies COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE MEMOIRES, PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS APPLICABILITE DE LA SECTION 22 DE L'ARTICLE VI " .. , . DE LA CONVENTION SUR LES PRIVILÈGES ET IMMUNITÉS DES NATIONS UNIES INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS . APPLICABILITY 01; ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22, OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNlTIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS Référence abrégée : C.I.J. Mémoires, Applicabililé de lu section 22 de l'article VI de la convention sur les privilPges et immunités des Nations Unies Abbreviated reference : 1. C.J. Pleadings, .4pplicability of Arficle VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Imrnunifies of the United Notions No de vente : ISSN 0074-4433 Sales number ISBN 92-1-070687-0 i l APPLlCABlLlTE DE LA SECTION 22 DE L'ARTICLE VI DE LA CONVENTION SUR LES PRIVILÈGESET IMMUNITES DES NATIONS UNIES APPLlCABlLlTY OF ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22. OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRlVlLEGES AND IMMUNlTlES OF THE UNITED NATIONS COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE MÉMOIRES. PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS APPLICABILITÉ DE LA SECTION 22 DE L'ARTICLE VI DE LA CONVENTION SUR LES PRIVILÈGES ET IMMUNITÉSDES NATIONS UNIES INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE PLEADINGS. ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22, OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS L'affaire de I'Aoolicabiliréde la section 22 de I'arricle VIde la convention sur I~sprivrlPgeset im;hunites des h'ations Unies. inscrite au r6le général de la Cour s<iu\ le numero 81, a fait l'objet d'un avis consuliatif rendu le 15 décembre 1989 (A~~licabilildde la section de I'arricle VI de la convention sur les orivil2~es ~~~rr~~ 22 - et imrnunirés des Nations Unies, C.I.J. Recueil 1989, p. 177). Le présent volume reproduit la requête pour avis consultatif, les documents. les exposes écrits et oraux et la correspondance relatifs a cette affaire. La Haye, 1992. The case concerning Applicabiliry of Arricle VI, Section 22, of rhe Conven- tion on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations was entered as No. 81 in the Court's General List and was the subject of an Advisory Opinion delivered on 15 December 1989 (Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on rhe Privileges and Immunities of the Unired Nations, I.C.J. Reoorts 1989. D. 177). ~hepresent- volume reproduces the Request for advisory opinion, the documents. the written and oral statements and the correspondence in the case. The Hague, 1992. REQUÊTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1 June 1989. 1 have the honour 10 inform you that pursuant to ARicle 96, paragraph 2, of the Charter of the United Nations, the Economic and Social Council at iis six- teenih meeting held on 24 May 1989 adooted resolution 1989/75 entitled *Siatus of special rapporteurs" requeiting an advisory opinion on a priority basis from the Internaiional Court of Justice on "ihe legal quesiion of the applicability of Article VI. Seciion 22. of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Naiions" of 13 February 1946 "in ihe case of Mr. Dumitru Mazilu as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission" on Preveniion of Discrimina- tion and Protection of Minorities. A certified coov of the resolution in Enclish - ~ and French is enclosed (Annex 1. A and B). ~hc'iords"on a prioriiy basis" in opcrative paragraph 2 wcre proposed by the United States and wcrc adovted by a recorded vote of 17 in favou; and 9 a~ainst.with 22 abstentions i~nnexIli. The resolution as a whole, as amended,was adopted by a recordedvote of 24 in favour and 8 against, with 19 abstentions (Annex III). 1 also have the honour to inform you thatmaterials for submission to the Court are being prepared pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute and will be sub- mitted to the Court as soon as possible. (Signed) Javier PÉREZ DE CU~LLAR. REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPlNtON Annex 1 A 1989/75. STANSOF SPECW RAPPORTEURS The Economic and Social Council, Having considered resolution 1988/37 of I September 1988 of the Sub- Commission on Prcvcntion of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities and Commirsion on Human Rights rnolution 1989/37 of 6 March 1989, 1. Concludes that a difference has arisen between the United Nations and the Government of Romania as to the applicability of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations' to MI. Dumitru Mazilu as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities; 2. Requests, on a priority basis, pnrsuant to Article 96, paragraph 2, of the Charter of the United Nations and in accordance with General Assembly resolu- lion 89 (1) of II December 1946, an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legal question of the applicability of Article VI, Sec- tion 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and lmmunities of the United Nations in the case of Mr. Dumitru Mazilu as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission. CERTIFED TRUE COPY. New York, N.Y. I June 1989. (Signed) Carl-August FLEISCHHAUER, The Legal Counsel. ' Oeneral Assembly resolution 22 A (1). Annexe 1 B 1989/75. STATUT DES RAPPORTEURS SPECIAUX Le Conseil économique et social, Ayanl examine' la résolution 1988/37 de la Sous-Commission de la lutte contre les mesures discriminatoires et de la protection des minorités, en date du septembre 1988, et la résolution 1989/37 de la Commission des droits de l'homme, en date du 6 mars 1989, 1. Conclut qu'une divergence de vues s'est élevée entre l'organisation des Nations Unies et le Gouvernement roumain auant à I'applicabilité de la convention sur les privileges et immunités des Nations uniesb au cas de M. Dumitru Mazilu. en sa qualité de rapporteur spécial de la Sous-Commission de la lutte contre les mesures discriminatoires et de la ~rotectiondes minorités; 2. Drnrandr A titre prioriraire i la Cdur in[crnatiunale de Jusrice. en sppliza- rion du paragraphe 2 de l'article 96 de la Charte des Nations Unies et coniormé- ment à la resoluiton 89 (11 de l'Assemblée etnerale. en date du 1 I décembre 1946, un avis consultatif's"r la question jurydique de I'applicabilité de la sec- tion 22 de l'article VI de la convention sur les privilkges et immunités des Nations Unies au cas de M. Dumitni Mazilu en sa qualité de rapporteur spécial de la Sous-Commission. coprE CERTIFIEE CONFORME. New York, le le' juin 1989 (Signé) Carl-August FLEISCHHAUER, le conseiller juridique. ' Résolution 22 A (1) de l'Assemblée générale. REQUEST FOR ADVlSORY OPINION Annex II The Economic and Social Council decided to include the woids "on a priority basis" in ooerative oaraeraoh. -. 2 of a draft reauestine the International Court's advisory opinion on the status of rnpportcu;~ (drnh resolution II. document E/1989/88). by a recorded vote of 17 in favour to 9 againsi. with 22 abstentions, as follows: In favour: Canada. Denmark. France. Germanv. Federal Reoublic of. ~rceic.Ireland. Italy, Japnn. Kenya. ~ethcrlands,'~ewnaland: Norway, Portugal, United Kingdom of Grcat Briiain and Northem Ircland. Unitcd ~tates~ofAmerica, uÏuguay, Venezuela. Againsl: Bulgaria. Cuba, Czechoslovakia. Iran (Islamic Republic of), Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Nicaragua, Poland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Repnblics. Abslaining: Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Ghana. Guinea, Indonesia, Iraq, Jordan, Lesotho, Liberia. Niger, Oman, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zambia. Absenr: Bahamas, India, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago. Annex III VOTEON STATUSOF SPECW RAPPORTEURS The Economic and Social Council adopted, as orally amended, a resolution on the status of special rapporteurs (draft resolution III. document E/1989/88), by a recorded vote of 24 in favour to 8 against, with 19 abstentions, as follows: In favour: Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada. Colombia, Den- mark, France, Germany, Federal Republic of, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan. Kenya, Netberlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Againsl: Bulgaria, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Libyan Arab lamahiriya, Poland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Abstaining: Cameroon, China, Ghana, Guinea, Indonesia, Iraq, Jor- dan, Lesotho, Liberia, Nicaragua, Niger, Oman, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Thailand, Tunisia, Zaire, Zambia. Absent: India, Saudi Arabia, Somalia. REQUBTE POUR AVIS CONSULTATIF Annexe II VOTESUR L'AMENDEMENT DU TEXTE RELATm AU STATUT DE RAPPORTEUR SPkCW Le Conseil economique et social a décidé d'inclure les mots «A titre priori- taire)) dans le .DaranraDhe -. 2 d'un uroiet.. oui. demande l'avis consultatif de la Cour internaiionale sur le statut des rapporteurs (projet de resolution II publie dans le document E/1989/88). et ce par un vote enregistre. par 17 voix contre 9. avec 22 abstentions, se répartissantcomme suit: Ont voté Dour: Allemagne- (Réuubliaue.. fédérale d'). Canada. Dane- mark, Eiats:~nis d'Amérique. rance; Crece, lrlande. Italie. ~a~on, Kenya, Norvège. Nouvelle-Zélande, Pays-Bas. Portugal. Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et rl'lrlande du Nord, Uruguay. Venezuela. Ont votécontre: Bulgarie, Cuba, lran (République islamique d'), Jama- hiriya arabe libyenne, Nicaragua. Pologne, République socialiste sovié- tique d'Ukraine. Tchécoslovaquie, Union des Républiques socialistes sovik- tiques. Se sont abstenus: Belize. Bolivie. Brésil. Cameroun. Chine. Colombie. Ghana, Guinde, Indonésie, iraq. or da nie, ~esotho,~ibéria. ~i~er, 0man; Rwanda, Soudan, Sri Lanka, Tunisie, Yougoslavie, Zaire, Zambie. Absents: Arabie saoudite, Bahamas, Inde, Somalie, Thaïlande, Trinite- et-Tobago. Annexe II1 VOTE SUR LE STATUT DES RAPPORTEURS SPÉCIAUX Le Conseil tconomique et social a adopté, telle qu'amendée oralement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition
    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1993 Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development Rett R. Ludwikowski The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Rett R. Ludwikowski, Constitution Making in the Countries of Former Soviet Dominance: Current Development, 23 GA. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 155 (1993). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEORGIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW VOLUME 23 1993 NUMBER 2 CONSTITUTION MAKING IN THE COUNTRIES OF FORMER SOVIET DOMINANCE: CURRENT DEVELOPMENT Rett R. Ludwikowski* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction I. Political and Constitutional Transformation of the Post-Glasnost Period: Country-by-Country Report. A. The End of Gorbachev's Era B. Constitution Drafting in Several Former Soviet Republics 1. Russia Federation 2. Lithuania 3. Estonia 4. Ukraine 5. Belarus 6. Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan C. Constitution Drafting in Former People's Republics of East-Central Europe 1. The First "Communist" Constitutions of Post-Communist Europe a. Bulgaria b. Romania c. Albania * Director, Comparative and International Law Institute, Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping State-Society Relations: Democratization in Southern and Eastern Europe
    RESHAPING STATE-SOCIETY RELATIONS: DEMOCRATIZATION IN SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPE Rafael Durán Working Paper #277 – July 2000 R ESHAP ING STATE- SOCIETY RELA TIONS D EMOC R ATIZATION IN SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROP E Rafael Durán Working Paper #277 – July 2000 Rafael Durán completed his MA in Social Sciences at the Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences (Juan March Institute, Madrid), and obtained a PhD in Political Science at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Professor Durán was a research fellow at the Instituto de Ciências Sociais, University of Lisbon, in 1995, and at the Kellogg Institute in 1999/00. His most recent publications include “New Social Movements, Democracy, and Crisis of Political Parties” in Political Participation and Representation in Multicultural Societies (University of Málaga, 1998); “State Dynamism and Multidimensionality: Social Protests during Regime Change” (CEACS Working Paper, 1999); and Moderation and Transgression: Social Mobilizations and the State during the Spanish and Portuguese Transitions (Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, Madrid, 2000). I would like to thank Valerie Bunce, Robert Fishman, Steve Levitsky, and Sidney Tarrow for a particularly critical reading and many thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Help was also offered by Moonis Ahmar, Andrzej Jablonski, and James Krapfl. Although the responsibility for its final form is mine in all respects, I am indebted to Robert Fishman for his invaluable assistance with the English version of this essay as well. The first draft was written at the University of Málaga (Spain). I presented a previous version, exclusively focused on Romania, at the international and interdisciplinary conference “Between the Bloc and the Hard Place: Moving towards Europe in Post-Communist States?” at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London, London, 6–7 November 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretele U.S.L.A
    TEODOR FILIP SECRETELE U.S.L.A. Cartea a fost tipărită la editura Obiectiv, Craiova, în colecţia Exploziv Ediţie electronică APOLOGETICUM 2005 Teodor Filip Volumul poate fi distribuit liber pentru uz personal. Această lucrare este destinată tuturor iubitorilor de istoria patriei. Ea poate fi utilizat ă, copiată şi distribuită LIBER cu menţionarea sursei. Scanare: Apologeticum Corectură: Clara Tehnoredactare : Apologeticum Digitalizare pdf : Apologeticum © 2005 APOLOGETICUM. http://apologeticum.net http://www.angelfire.com/space2/carti/ [email protected] 2 Secretele U.S.L.A. CUVÂNTUL EDITORULUI Iată că, după „Secretele lui Pavel Coruţ” (autori: Eugen Delcea şi Oana Nuţă) şi „Războiul parapsihologic împotriva României” (autor: Teodor Filip), editate şi reeditate în anul 1998, Editura „OBIECTIV” - Craiova dă de lucru difuzorilor de carte cu o nouă „bombă editorială”: „Secretele U.S.L.A.”, binecunoscută cititorilor săptămânalelor „Crişana Plus” (Oradea) şi „Obiectiv Magazin” (Craiova) drept „Confesiunile unui fost uslaş”. În prefaţa volumului „Războiul parapsihologic împotriva României”, scriam că „dl. Teodor Filip este un prolific în ale scrisului” şi că „mai mult ca sigur, nu peste mult timp, va intra în galeria celor mai cunoscuţi autori români post-decembrişti, aşa cum sunt Pavel Coruţ şi dr. Cristian Negureanu”. Sperăm, totodată să ţinem pasul cu dl. Teodor Filip, pentru că domnia sa mai are încă multe de dezvăluit!...”. Toate aceste afirmaţii, aparent îndrăzneţe, sunt confirmate acum de apariţia volumului de faţă şi de faptul că autorul mai are în lucru încă două „bombe editoriale”... care vor completa în mod fericit, cu siguranţă, un bogat plan editorial al nostru, pentru anul 1999, privind „Colecţia EXPLOZIV”. Pentru că cititorii care n-au avut şansa să lectureze „Războiul parapsihologic împotriva României” îşi vor pune, în mod sigur, întrebarea-cheie „Cine este, totuşi, Teodor Filip?”, suntem nevoiţi să repetăm unele precizări din prefaţa volumului anterior al autorului.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Memory and National Identity in Post-Communist Romania: Representations of the Communist Past in Romanian News Media and Romanian Politics (1990 - 2009)
    COLLECTIVE MEMORY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA: REPRESENTATIONS OF THE COMMUNIST PAST IN ROMANIAN NEWS MEDIA AND ROMANIAN POLITICS (1990 - 2009) A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Constanta Alina Hogea May 2014 Examining Committee Members: Carolyn Kitch, Advisory Chair, Journalism Nancy Morris, Media Studies and Production Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Journalism Mihai Coman, External Member, University of Bucharest © Copyright 2014 by Constanta Alina Hogea All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT My dissertation situates at the intersection of communication studies and political sciences under the umbrella of the interdisciplinary field of collective memory. Precisely, it focuses on the use of the communist past by political actors to gain power and legitimacy, and on the interplay between news media and politics in shaping a national identity in post-communist Romania. My research includes the analysis of the media representations of two categories of events: the anniversaries of the Romanian Revolution and the political campaigns for presidential/parliamentary elections. On the one hand, the public understanding of the break with communism plays an important role in how the post-communist society is defined. The revolution as a schism between the communist regime and a newborn society acts like a prism through which Romanians understand their communist past, but also the developments the country has taken after it. On the other hand, political communication is operating on the public imaginary of the past, the present and the future. The analysis of the political discourses unfolded in the news media shows how the collective memory of the communist past is used to serve political interests in the discursive struggle for power and legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Dumitru Mazilu
    DR. DUMITRU MAZILU PROFESSIONAL HISTORY: 1959 Graduated from the Faculty of Law 1964 Doctor's Degree in Law at Cluj; Professor of Law at the Social and Political Sciences Academy; at the School of the Ministry of the Interior; Professor of International Law (Human Rights and the Law of the Sea) 1965 till 1968 Chairman of the National Sub-Commission for Inquiring into abuses and illegalities 1970 till 1974 Scientific Director of the Institute of Political Sciences, Bucharest 1974 Visiting Professor, Columbia, Harvard, Berkeley, Universities 1975 till 1986 Legal Adviser in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Representative of Romania to the Law of the Sea Conference 1983 – 1988 Member of the United Nations Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Geneva 1978 till 1985 Representative of Romania to the Sixth (Legal )Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations 1985 till 1993 United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Youth 1986 till 1989 He was kept in detention for his critical Report on Human Rights in Romania 1988 – 1989 The International Court of Justice at Hague judged his case and – through Decision 81/ 15 December 1989 – asked the Romanian authorities to free him, underlining that he is enjoying the United Nations' diplomatic immunity 1989 till 1990 Vice – President of Romania, after the Romanian Revolution 1991 Doctor Honoris Causa by A.C. of Switzerland for promotion of Human Rights 1991 to date Professor of International Law (Human Rights and the Law of the Sea)
    [Show full text]
  • 51. Additional Comments by U.S
    BEFORE THE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE The Hague The Netherlands Request by the United Nations Economic and Social Council for an Advisory Opinion on the Legal Question of the Applicability of Article VI, Section 22 of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946, in the Case of Mr. Dumitru Mazilu, as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Abraham D. Sofaer Legal Adviser Bruce C. Rashkow, David A. Balton Attorneys Office of the Legal Adviser Department of State Washington, D.C. AUGUST 31, 1989 BEFORE THE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE The Hague The Netherlands Request by the United Nations Economic and social Council for an Advisory Opinion on the Legal Question of the Applicability of Article VI, Section 22 of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946, in the Case of Mr. Dumitru Mazilu, as Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Abraham D. Sofaer Legal Adviser Bruce C. Rashkow, David A. Balton Attorneys Office of the Legal Adviser Department of State Washington, D.C. AUGUST 31, 1989 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 3 A. The Court has jurisdiction to render this advisory opinion under Article 96 of the Charter and UN General Assembly Resolution 89(1) 4 B. Romania's reservation to section 30 does not affect the jurisdiction of the Court to render this advisory opinion 7 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicability of Article Vi, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations
    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES APPLICABILITÉ DE LA SECTION 22 DE L'ARTICLE VI DE LA CONVENTION SUR LES PRIVILÈGES ET IMMUNITÉS DES NATIONS UNIES AVIS CONSULTATIF DU 15 DÉCEMBRE 1989 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22, OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS ADVISORY OPINION OF 15 DECEMBER 1989 Mode officiel de citation : Applicabilité de la section 22 de l'article VI de la convention sur les privilèges et immunités des Nations Unies, avis consultatij C.I.J. Recueil 1989, p. 177. Officia1 citation : Applicability ofArticle VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1989, p. 177. No de vente : Sales number 573 1 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 1989 1989 15 December General List 15 December 1989 No. 81 APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE VI, SECTION 22, OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE UNITED NATIONS Competence of the Court to give opinion requested - Article 96, paragraph 2, of United Nations Charter - Relevance of lack of consent of State concerned - Opinion requested on applicability of multilateral convention - Dispute settlement clauseprovidingfor decisive advisory opinion - Reservation to clause - No refer- ence to clause in request for opinion and no intention to invoke it - Request based exclusively on Article 96 of Charter - Jurisdiction to entertain the request not affected by reservation. Propriety of giving the opinion - Whether there is any compelling reason to decline - Whether reply would have effect of circumventing principle of consent.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bullets, Lies, and Videotape: the Amazing, Disappearing Romanian
    Bullets, Lies, and Videotape: The Amazing, Disappearing Romanian Counter-Revolution of December 19891 by Richard Andrew Hall, Ph.D. Standard Disclaimer: All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official positions or views of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or any other U.S. Government agency. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying U.S. Government authentication of information or CIA endorsement of the author’s views. This material has been reviewed by CIA to prevent the disclosure of classified information. [Submitted to CIA’s Publications Review Board (PRB) 19 November 2009; cleared without changes by PRB 15 December 2009] I am an intelligence analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency. I have been a CIA analyst since 2000. Prior to that time, I had no association with CIA outside of the application process. His name was Ghircoias…Nicolae Ghircoias. And in Romania in December 1989 and January 1990, Nicolae Ghircoias was a very busy man. We know, officially, of Nicolae Ghircoias’ actions in the last days leading up to the fall of the regime of communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu on 22 December 1989, as a result of what he and others said at a trial later in January 1990. In bureaucratic parlance, Colonel Nicolae Ghircoias, was the Director of the Criminalistic Institute of the Militia’s [Police’s] General Inspectorate. In colloquial terms, in December 1989 it appears that this amounted to being something of a “cleaner,” or “fixer,” the kind of guy who could make unpleasant things—such as corpses—go away, without leaving a trace.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Juridical Yearbook, 1989 – Chapter VII. Decisions And
    Extract from: UNITED NATIONS JURIDICAL YEARBOOK 1989 Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating to the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations Chapter VII. Decisions and advisory opinions of international tribunals Copyright (c) United Nations Part Three. Judicial decisions on questions relating to the United Nations and related intergovernmental organizations CHAPTER VII. DECISIONS AND ADVISORY OPINIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS International Court of Justice Applicability of article VI, section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations (request for advisory opinion) ................................................................. 383 CHAPTER VIII. DECISIONS OF NATIONAL TRIBUNALS Mexico Ministry of Foreign Affairs Communiqué to the President of the Special Federal Concilia- tion and Arbitration Board No. 14 ....................................... 395 Part Four. Bibliography LEGAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND RELATED INTERGOVERNMEN- TAL ORGANIZATIONS A. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN GENERAL 1. General ................................................................................. 400 2. Particular questions .............................................................. 404 B. UNITED NATIONS 1. General ................................................................................. 405 2. Particular organs................................................................... 407 General Assembly ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Romania905.Pdf
    NEWS FROM ROMANIA: ETHNIC CONFLICT IN TIRGU MURES May 1990 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................1 Chronology of Events............................................................................................................................................... 2 The Events of March 19, 1990.......................................................................................................... 2 The Events of March 20, 1990......................................................................................................... 4 Parliamentary Commission Established.......................................................................................................6 Gypsies as Scapegoats..........................................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION States Parties undertake to prohibit and to eliminate racial discrimination in all its forms and to guarantee the right of everyone without distinction as to race, color, or national or ethnic origin, to equality before the law, notably in the enjoyment of . b. The right to security of person and protection by the State against violence or bodily harm, whether inflicted by Government officials or by any individual, group or institution . UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (Ratified by Romania
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of HUMAN RIGHTS in ROMANIA (An Update)
    [COMMITTEE PRINT] 101ST CONGRESS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATWIES CSCE REVOLT AGAINST SILENCE: THE STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ROMANIA (An Update) Prepared by the Staff OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE DECEMBER 1989 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OmCE 2o-480 WASHINGTON: 1989 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. Congressional Sales Office U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE DENNIS DECONCINI,; Arizona, Chairman STENY H. HOYER, Maryland, Cochairman DANTE B. FASCELL, Florida FRANK LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts TIMOTHY WIRTH, Colorado BILL RICHARDSON, New Mexico WYCHE FOWLER, Georgia EDWARD FEIGHAN, Ohio HARRY REID, Nevada DON RITTER, Pennsylvania ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey JAMES McCLURE, Idaho JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois MALCOM WALLOP, Wyoming FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia ExEcUTIVE BRANCH HON. RICHARD SCHIF1ER. Department of State STEPHEN J. HADLEY, Department of Defense WILLIAM D. FRITTS, Jr., Department of Commerce SAMUEL G. WISE, Staff Director MARY Suz HAFNxR, Deputy Staff Director and General Counsel JANE S. FisHER, Deputy Staff Director MIKE AMITAY, Staff Assistant ANN W. BANCHOFF, Staff Assistant CATHERINE CosmAN, Staff Assistant KIMBERLY PIDCOKE, Receptionist ORmS DEYcHAKiwsKY, Staff Assistant JOHN FtNxRTY, Staff Assistant ROBErT HAND, Staff Assistant GINA M. 1ARNER, Administrative Assistant JuDIrH INGRAM, Staff Assistant JESSE JACOBS, Staff Assistant RONALD McNAmARA, Staff Assistant MicHAnE OcNB, Staff Assistant SPENCER OLIVER, Consultant MARK RAmxE, Senior Advisor for Soviet & East European Affairs BErH Rrcmm, Press Officer ERIKA SCHLAGER, Staff Assistant TOM WARNER, Printing Clerk (H) ...
    [Show full text]