SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
CHHATTISGARH
REPORT ON APPRAISAL OF ANNUAL WORK PLAN AND BUDGET FOR 2009-10
In respect of: Bastar, Bijapur, Bilaspur, Dantewada, Dhamtari, Durg, Janjgir- Champa, Jashpur, Kanker, Kawardha, Korba, Korea, Mahasamund, Narayanpur, Raigarh, Raipur, Rajnandgaon, Surguja and State Component. SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN
CHHATTISGARH
REPORT ON APPRAISAL OF ANNUAL WORK PLAN & BUDGET FOR 2009-10
NUEPA DC illllllilil D13426
In respect of: Bastar, Bijapur, Bilaspur, Dantewada, Dhamtari, Durg, Janjgir-Champa, Jashpur, Ranker, Kawardha, Korba, Korea, Mahasamund, Narayanpiir, Raigarh, Raipur, Rajnandgaon, Surguja, and State Component
m v T X
Ixecutive Summary oi
TntrocCuction 16
Tdiicatwnaf Indicators 18
SAccess & Out o f Sc fiooC CftiCcCren 28
CiviCyVorks 47
Qiiaiitxf reCatecf issues 56
VET) 116
Innovative Activities 122
(^irCs 'EcCucation 134
Hesearcfi., TvaCuation, Monitoring ancCSupervision "138
Strategies for Community MohiCization 139
Invofvement of\H ^ O 141
Project Management 142
SjpeciaC Jocus Districts a n d Minorities 145
Observations of MI 152
J a ct Sheet
JAnnexures APPRAISAL REPORT 2009-10
1. An Executive Summary of key items should be provided in the given foimat:-
(I) Progress Overview for 2008-09 (Rs. in lakh) Sanctioned Budget Achievements SNo. Activity (2008-09) (tin 31-03-09) Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. New Schools Upgraded EGS /New 1.1 Primary School 1.2 Upper Primary Schools 25 25 Teachers 2.1 Primary School 45 12.960 18 8.352 40.00 64.44 2.2 Upper Primary School 1549 628.913 912 456.697 58.88 72.62 2.3 Additional Teachers 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00 0.00 2.4 Recurring Teachers 53391 32569.875 46602 30188.678 87.28 92.69 Total 54985 33211.748 47532 30653.727 86.45 92.30 Teacher Grant 115942 579.710 114359 571.795 98.63 98.63 Grants for BRC 146 737.096 146 431.046 100.27 58.48 Grants for CRC 2169 164.844 2169 164.844 100.00 100.00 Teachers’ Training 6.1 In-Service Training 115642 1734.630 99748 1445.318 86.26 83.32 Induction Training-New 6.2 13707 411.217 11995 375.265 87.51 91.26 teachers Refresher Course- 6.3 300 12.600 300 12.600 100.00 100.00 Untrmned Teachers BRC & CRC Coordinators 6.4 2,315 11.575 1,219 7.297 52.66 63.04 & Resource Persons Total 131964 2170.022 113262 1840.480 85.83 84.81 Intervention for Out of School Children (No. of 85772 4017.043 49453 2064.272 57.66 51.39 Children covered) . Remedial Teaching 200828 399.764 108692 280.342 54.12 70.13 Free Text Books 3259177 3724.293 3259177 3724.293 100.00 100.00 10 lED 41672 500.064 12619 361.558 30.28 72.30 11 Civil Works 11.1 BRC 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.2 CRC 363 337.723 142 303.321 39.12 89.81 Primary School (40 11.3 58 55.546 27 55.546 46.55 100.00 children)______Primary School (10 11.4 350 92.516 56 80.516 16.00 87.03 children)______11.5 Upper Primary School 452 496.336 64 454.976 14.16 91.67 Prefabricated School 11.6 Building in Dantewada 48 274.400 274.400 0.00 100.00 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.7 25.824 25.824 0.00 100.00 previous years under SSA 120 (10 children)______
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 1 Sanctioned Budget Achievements % age Achievements SNo. Activity (2008-09) (till 31-03-09) Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Building for Primary School sanctioned in 1888 6470.276 962 6439.776 11.8 previous years under SSA 50.95 99.53 (40 children)
Building for Upper Primary 11.9 School sanctioned in 1415 2766.820 387 2707.595 27.35 97.86 previous years under SSA
11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 8698 12076.117 5638 12030.117 64.82 99.62 Additional Class 5771 9125.462 2918 9125.462 100.00 11.11 Room(UPS) 50.56 11.12 T oilet/Urinals(PS) 4.598 4.598 0.00 100.00 11.13 Separate Gtfls Toilet 0.006 0.006 0.00 100.00 11.14 Water Facility 9.002 9.002 0.00 100.00 11.15 Boundary Wall 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.16 Separation Wall 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.17 Electrification 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.18 Head Master's Room 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.19 Residential Hostel 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 366 450.064 201 450.064 54.92 100.00 Major Reipairs (Upper 11.21 77 102.425 40 102.425 51.95 100.00 Primary)______BALA Concept (in Govt. 11.22 25 6.250 6.250 0.00 100.00 UPS)______11.23 Otlier (Boundary Wall) 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 Furniture for Govt. UPS 11.24 0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 students Total CivU Works 19631 32293.364 10435 32069.876 53.16 99.31 12 TLE 0 14_.300 2.100 0.00 14.69 13 Maintenance Grant 43145 1974.180 36512 1924.844 84.63 97.50 14 School Grant 46093 921.860 46093 .921.860 100.00 100.00 15 REMS 46093 599.206 14480 380.720 31.41 63.54 16 Management & LEP 16.1 Management 1806 1850.940 1387.295 0.17 74.95 16.2 LEP 18 1490.500 866.975 33.33 58.17 Total 1806 3341.440 2254.270 0.17 67.46 Innovations
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 2 (II)A. FinaDcial Information (Rs, in lakh) Releases Fund Opening Approved Total Year Gol State from Exp. % Exp. Balance AWP&B Available Share Share other Fund sources 2001-02 779.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2002-03 7543.53 2850.98 900.97 0.00 3751.95 2106.37 56.14 2003-04 1653.55 21830.09 7616.08 2538.69 0.00 11808.32 7559.21 64.02 2004-05 4927.97 39396.35 20786.76 6896.58 65.93 32677.24 29425.46 90.05 2005-06 3253.11 55068.02 29184.39 10396.58 735.36 43569.44 42746.54 98.11 2006-07 5587.32 82131.66 51182.20 16057.16 787.09 73613.77 64430.00 87.52 2007-08 8221.43 78475.70 52422.41 16470.54 1964.67 79079.05 64430.00 81.48
For 2008-09: (Rs. in lakh) 1. Total outlay 90002.452 2. Total Releases 2.1 OOl Share 51853.86 2.2 State Share 27821.25 3. Other Receipts 37.67 4. Opening Balance 8235.87 Total 87948.65 5. Expenditure till March 2009 (Amount in 82065.14 figures and % age of utilization) 93.31%
(III) Teams to provide information on: 1. Status of State share:
a. Funding pattern 60:40 between GOI and State. b. Backlog Rs. 438.90 lakh c. Provisiori in current year The State in its letter dated 28-2-2009 has confirmed that a budget provision of Rs. 360 crore is proposed in the State Budget for 2009-10. This would be sufficient to cover the proposed outlay of Rs. 900.55 crore and the backlog of State Share for 2008-09.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 3 2. Information on maintaining the level of expenditure in Elementary education as on 1999-2000 (Rs. in lakh i Year Total Exp. of State on E.E. 2001-2002 32325.40 2002-2003 43899.30 2003-2004 50996.40 2004-2005 80437.40 2005-2006 80316.00 2006-2007 98228.00 2007-2008 121022.00 2008-2009 178637.00
The State was formed on 1-11-2000 and maintaining the level of expenditure in Elementary Education as on 2001-02.
(IV) Proposals & Recommendations for 2009-10: (Rs. in lakh) Proposal for fresh Recommendation Remark/ SNo. Interventions allocation against proposals Conditionalities Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 New Schools ■ New Primary School (for 1.1 0 0 10 to 25 children) New Primary School (for 1.2 1 1 >25 children) As per eligible 1.3 Upgradation of PS to UPS 398 190 habitations. 2 Teacher’s Salary A New Teachers 1 PS 2 0.336 2 0.336 In proportion to 2 UPS 1194 239.994 570 114.570 the new UPS allowed. Single teacher Gyan Jyoti schools sanctioned in 3 Additional 540 73.920 540 90.720 2006-07. Students increased more than 40. Sub Total 1736 314.250 1112 205.626 B Recurring Teachers 1 PS 17218 14463.120 17218 14463.120 2 UPS 21363 20790.360 21363 20711.320 3 Additional Teachers 1^404 14180.976 16404 14169.820
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 4 Proposal for fresh Recommendation SNo. Interventions allocation against proposals Remark/ Conditionalities Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Sub Total 54985 49434.456 54985 49344.260 Total Salary (Recurring 56721 49748.706 56097 49549.886 + non recurring) 3 Teachers’ Grant 134338 671.690 134338 671.690 4 BRC Grant 146 737.096 146 737.096 5 CRC Grant 2169 164.844 2169 164.844 6 Teachers’ Training 6.1 in-service Training 126121 1891.815 126121 1891.815 Induction training - New In proportion to 6.2 12276 368.286 1112 33.360 the new teachers Teachers allowed. Refresher Course- 6.3 8217 493.020 8217 493.020 Untrained Teachers BRC/CRC Coordinators & 6.4 2315 11.575 2315 11.575 RPs (5days) Sub Total 148929 2764.696 137765 2429.770 Interventions for Out of 7 School Children (No of - children covered) 7.1 NRBC (P) 5031 150.930 5031 142.327 Unit cost reduced 7.2 NRBC (UP) 3476 104.280 3476 98.336 to Rs. 2830/-
Seasonal Hostels for Unit cost reduced 7.3 1131 113.100 1131 56.550 Migrants (Residential) to Rs. 5000/- Dormitory for Tribal 7.4 1200 120.000 1200 120.000 Students(Residential) Bridge Course Residential 7.5 20485 2048.500 20485 1392.980 (PSX9months) Unit cost reduced Bridge Course Residential to Rs. 6800/- 7.6 18571 ' 1857.100 18571 1262.828 (UPX9 months) Sub Total 49894 4393.910 49894 3073.021 Unit cost reduced 233095 466.190 198678 397.356 8 Remedial Teaching to Rs. 200/- For all girls and SC/ST boys. State 10 3368767 4290.228 3368767 4290.228 Free Text Books Govt, is providing for other boys. 11 lED 46153 553.836 46153 553.836 12 Civil Works 12.1 BRC 0 0.000 0 0.000 12.2 CRC 0 34.402 0 34.402 Primary School (40 12.3 1 7.260 1 7.260 children) Primary School (10 12.4 0 12.000 0 12.000 children) In proportion to 12.5 Upper Primary School 398 2099.020 190 1023.660 the new UPS
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 5 Proposal for fresh Recommendation Rem ark/ SNo. Interventions allocation against proposals Conditionalities Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. allowed. Building for Primary The backlog of School sanctioned in 1306 schools 12.6 365 1727.75 0 0.000 previous years under SSA sanctioned in (10 children) 2008-09 Building for Primary School sanctioned in 12.7 0 30.500 0 30.500 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sanctioned 12.8 0 59.226 0 59.226 in previous years under SSA Additional Class 12.9 10012 20070.000 3243 6532.000 Room(PS) Restricted due to fund constraints Additional Class 12.10 6150 12300.000 2248 4496.000 Room(UPS) 12.11 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 59 14.750 0 0.000 Priority given to - schools and 12.12 Separate Girls Toilet 2691 1345.500 0 0.000 ACRs Ashramshala (Residential Unit cost 12.13 61 " 3267.770 61 2199.050 Schools) restricted to 12.14 Major Reipairs (Primary) 393 477.742 0 0.000 Not allowed due Major Reipairs (Upper to fund 12.15 59 107.733 0 0.000 Primary) constraints Furniture for Govt. UPS As per eligible 12.16 27488 137.440 14107 70.535 students children in UPS. Sub Total 47677 41660.593 19850 14464.633 13 TLE 13.1 TLE - New Primary 1 0.200 1 0.200 In proportion to 13.2 TLE - New Upper Primary 398 199.000 190 95.000 the new UPS allowed. 13.3 Other (TLE) 3 1.500 0 0.000 Sub Total 402 200.700 191 95.200 Restricted to the 14 Maintenance Grant 41519 3113.925 41519 2663.050 average of Rs. 7500/- Unit cost @ Rs. School Grant 46029 920.580 46029 920.580 15 2000/- 16 REMS 46029 598.377 46029 598.377 17 Management & LEP Restricted to 17.1 Management & MIS 6 3048.253 6 2230.273 eligible activities. 2.566% Learning Enhancement- 17.2 5 2332.000 5 1702.000 1.96% Programme Sub Total 5 5380.253 6 3932.273
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 6 Proposal for fresh Recommendation Remark/ SNo. Interventions allocation against proposals Conditionalities Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 18 Innovations 18.1 ECCE 18 270.000 18 270.000 18.2 Girls Education 18 270.000 18 270.000 18.3 SC/ST Education 18 270.000 18 270.000 18.4 Computer Education 18 900.000 18 900.000 18.5 Urban deprived Children 18 90.000 18 90.000 Sub Total 18 1800.000 18 1800.000 As per the eligible 19 Community Training 179354 107.612 169278 101.567 members. Total of SSA (Districts) 4527372 117573.237 4316927 86443.407 20 State Component As per the eligible 20.1 Management Cost 642.213 0 465.855 activities. 20.2 REMS 0.000 0.000 20.3 SIEMAT State Total of SSA 4527372 118215.450 4316927 86909.262 Additional incentives 21 NPEGEL 1059' 1891.884 1059 786.946 restricted to the savings in textbooks. Rent restricted to 22 KGBV 93 2377.050 93 2359.050 Rs. 1.2 lakh per KGBV. Grand Total 4528524 122484.384 4318079 90055.257 (SSA+NPEGEL+KGBV)
(V) Number of small districts getting Rs. 20 lakh should be indicated: NIL
(VI) Total Recommended Budget: (Rs. in lakh) Total Proposals Total Recommended Outlay SNo. Head Spill Spill Fresh Total Fresh Total Over Over 1 SSA 226.098 117989.352 118215.450 226.098 86683.164 86909.262 2 NPEGEL 0.000 1891.884 1891.884 Q.OOO 786.946 786.946 3 KGBV 0.000 2377.050 2377.050 0.000 2359.050 2359.050 Total 226.098 122258.286 122484.384 226.098 89829.160 90055.257
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 7 (VII) Information on Quality Interventions: (Rs in Lakh Financial SNo. Category Recommendation for 2009-10 1 Teacher’s Salary 49549.886 2 Teacher Grant 671.690 3 BRC 737.096 4 CRC 164.844 5 Teachers’ Training 2429.770 6 Remedial Teaching 397.356 7 Free Textbooks 4290.228 8 School Grant 920.580 9 REMS 598.377 10 Innovative Activities 1800.000 11 NPEGEL 786.946 12 TLE for new schools 95.200 13 Learning Enhancement Programme 1702.000 14 Any other Total: 64143.973 % of total outlay 71.41%
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 8 Category-wise Allocation and Percentage to total outlay 2009-10
% to total SNo. Category/ Actvity Amount outlay I Equity 1 EGS/AIE 3073.021 3.41% 2 lED 553.836 0.61% 3 NPEGEL (50%) 393.473 0.44% 4 KGBV 2359.050 2.62% Subtotal ^ 6379.380 7.08% II 0«&M 5 Management Cost (Dist) 2230.273 2.48% 6 Management Cost (State) 465.855 0.52% Subtotal 2696.128 2.99% III Infrastructure 0.00% 7 Civil Works 14464.633 16.06% 8 Major Repairs 0.000 0.00% 9 Maintenance 2663.050 2.96% 10 TLE 95.200 0.11% Subtotal 17222.883 19.12% IV Quality • 11 Textbook 4290.228 4.76% 12 BRC (other than civil works) 737.096 0.82% 13 CRC (other than civil works) 164.844 0.18% 14 School Grant 920.580 1.02% 15 Teacher Grant 671.690 0.75% 16 Remedial Teaching 397.356 0.44% 17 Teacher's Training 2429.770 2.70% 18 Innovative Activities 1800.000 2.00% 19 Community Training 101.567 0.11% 20 Research and Evaluation 598.377 0.66% 21 LEP 1702.000 1.89% 22 NPEGEL (50%) 393.473 0.44% Subtotal 14206.981 15.78% 23 Teachers Salary 49549.886 55.02% Subtotal 49549.886 55.02% Grand Total 90055.257 100.00%
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 9 Details on the committed Expenditure and variable Components Remarks ( Reasons % for % Approved % age Recommended change Exp. change in SNo. Activity outlay to Outlay 2009- over (2008-09) outlay to 2008-09 outlay 10 previous previous year years outlay) Committed — Expenditure 1 Teachers Grant 579.710 571.795 98.63% 671.690 15.87% 2 School Grant 921.860 921.860 100.00% 920.580 -0.14% Maintenance 3 1974.180 1924.844 97.50% 2663.050 34.89% Grant Block Resource 4 Centre 737.096 431.046 58.48% 737.096 0.00% (BRC)AJBRC Cluster Resource 5 164.844 164.844 100.00% 164.844 0.00% Centres In-service 6 Teachers' 1734.630 1445.318 83.32% 1891.815 9.06% Training Other (R?s) 7 11.575 7.297 63.04% 11.575 0.00% training Community 8 103.268 84.445 81.77% 101.567 -1.65% Training 9 Free Text Book 3724.293 3724.293 100.00% 4290.228 15.20% Interventions for 10 500.064 361.558 72.30% 553.836 10.75% CWSN Research & 11 599.206 380.720 63.54% 598.377 -0.14% Evaluation Management & 12 1850.940 1387.295 74.95% 2230.273 20.49% MIS Learning 13 Enhancement : 1490.500 866.975 58.17% 1702.000 14.19% Prog. (L-EP) Innovative 14 1686.292 1478.424 87,67% 1800.000 6.74% Activity 15 NPEGEL 722.926 549.160 75.96% 786.946 8.86% 16 KGBV 2841.030 2307.082 81.21% 2359.050 -16.96% Remedial 17 399.764 280.342 70.13% 397.356 -0.60% Teching Teachers Salary 18 (Recurring) 32569.875 30188.678 92.69% 49344.260 51.50%
Variable components 19 Civil Works 32293.364 32069.876 99.31% 14394.098 -55.43% 20 Furniture for | 0.000 0.000 0.00% 70.535 0.00%
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 10 Remarks % ( Reasons for % Approved % age Recommended change Exp. change in SNo. Activity outlay to Outlay 2009- over (2008-09) outlay to 2008-09 outlay 10 previous year previous years outlay) Govt. UPS Teaching 21 Learning - 14.300 - 2.100 14.69% 95.200 565.73% Equipment Induction trg for 22 Newly Recruit 411.217 375.265 91.26% 33.360 -91.89% Trained Teach Training for 23 Untrained 12.600 12.600 100.00% 493.020 3812.86% Teachers Interventions for 24 4017.043 2064.272 51.39% 3073.021 -23.50% OOSC New Teachers 25 641.873 465.049 72.45% 205.626 -67.96% Salary STATE 26 0.000 0.000 0.00% 465.855 0.00% COMPONENT 90002.452 82065.140 9L18%- 90055.257 0.06% GRAND TOTAL
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 11 (Ill) Issues
a. Financial Management: 1. In the district Project Management Cost, Rs. 323.60 lakh has been proposed under lEC for Janpahal programme. Since this activity is not covered under Project Management, the same has not been recommended.
2. In the State Component Plan, Rs. 20 lakh for mobilization of lEC, Rs. 75 lakh for resource support from Pratham and Rs. 100 lakh for Child Tracking System have been proposed. As these activities are not covered under Project Management, the same have not been recommended.
3. The State has proposed 365 primary school buildings for schools sanctioned in earlier years. However, as per the records available, 1306 primary schools for the remaining backlog of schools sanctioned in previous years were sanctioned to the State. Hence, this proposal has not been recommended.
4. The State has proposed 61 Ashramshalas (residential schools) in the Naxale affected districts V without any teachers and TLE to provide education to the affected children in these districts. The proposal is recommended for consideration of PAB.
5. The Annual Reports for 2006-07 and 2007-08 were due for submission by December 2007 and 2008 respectively which are still awaited from the State. The State should take immediate action to submit the same by 31®* March 2009.
6. The revised Audit Report for 2007-08 is still awaited from the State which is to be submitted by lO**’ March 2009 positively.
7. - The compliance of statutory audit reports for 2005-06 and 2006-07 is yet to be furnished by the State. The State should furnish the same by 31®‘ March 2009.
8. Rs. 2187.68 lakh is still outstanding on account of refund of unspent balances of DPEP. The State should refund the same by 31®* March 2009 failing which further releases of funds under SSA shall be affected.
b. Quality: 1. Learning achievement of students needs improvement both at Primary and Upper Primary level 2. Teacher absenteeism and rationalization remain issues 3. Learning assessment system needs to be revisited (7 tests in a year) 4. Study on Student and teacher attendance needs to undertaken 5. Study on Time - on - Task needs to be undertaken 6. Progress of performance of teachers and trainers needs to be reported.
c. Educational indicators 1. Drop out rate is increasing in the State (Primary- 2007-08: 7.99; 2008-09: 9.59 and Upper Primary- 2007-08: 6.88; 2008-09: 12.82)
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 12 2. DISE data 2008-09 is not used in AWP&B 2009-10 and EDI data has not been utilized
d. Civil Works State has large gaps for toilets and drinking water (70059). The State is not effectively monitoring the work of convergence with PHE. The State should ensure completion of gaps of DWS and TSC after proper co-ordination with the state convergence team and also monitor the completion of these gaps monthly/quarterly.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 13 (IV) Comments on States commitments and implementation:
SNo. PAB Commitment Status Comment/s 1 100% access to primary and upper All sanctioned schools Noted primary schooling will be ensured operationalized, however where by operationalizing all sanctioned access remains an issue, new schools under SSA at the beginning schools have been proposed. of academic session 2008-09.
2 All 169753 out of school children 150666 OOSC were covered, The State should ensure would be covered this year through 18987 children still remained adequate strategies to appropriate strategies, especially in uncovered and 52820 are the cover all OoSC the naxal affected districts. fresh drop outs. To identify more identified so fai', so as OoSC, radio advertisement was to achieve the UEE. ( started asking people from public to inform about OoSC children. 502 calls received so far in this call centre. 3 The drop out rate at present is As per calculations in 2007-08, As per DISE 2007-08, 10.48% at the Primary Stage, as per the dropout rate is 9.59, which is the drop out rate at DISE (2006-07). The drop out rate a reduction by 8.52 percent primary level is 7.35. would be reduced by at least 5 points. The State has not percentage points in 2008-09. achieved the desired reduction by 5 ppt in 2008-09. The State should therefore take appropriate measures to achieve the same. 4 The State would strive to achieve As per DISE 2007-08, the As per DISE 2007-08, gender parity at the elementary level percentage of girl’s enrolment at the girls’ enrollment at to ensure that the share of girls in primary is 48.8 % and at upper primary level remained primary and upper primary reflects primary is 47.52 %. at 48.8%, which is their share in population in the State. same for 2006-07 and As per DISE 2006-07, the there is no percentage of girls’ enrolment at improvement. For primary is 48.88% and at upper upper primary the same primary, it is 47.29%. was at 47.99% resulting in a marginal increase. The State should take further steps to improve the gender parity at the elementarv level. 5 The State would ensure that the Enrolment of Muslim children is As per DISE 2007-08 share of enrolment of Muslim 2.05% at primary and 1.79 % at the % of Muslim minority children would reflect their upper primary level. enrollment at primary share in the population in the State. level is 0.68 and at
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 14 As per Census 2001, the percentage upper primary is 0.90. of Muslim population in the State is Even though there a 1.97% and the enrolment of Muslim marginal improvement children is 0.56% at primary and the State should take 0.84% at upper primary. further steps to improve the same. All incomplete civil works would be Out of the civil works, those The completion rate of completed by June 2008. from 2002-03 to 2008-09, civil works is not completion rate is 69%. For satisfactory. The State 2008-09, 93 % works have should complete all the started; and 7 % are completed civil works sanctioned already. upto 2008-09 by July 2009. The backlog in recruitment of 15000 teachers were given The State has 4454 teachers would be filled up before induction training after fresh vacancies of SSA the start of the academic session recruitment. For the balance teachers and 34985 2008-09. vacancies, recruitment process is teacher vacancies of on in the districts. State Govt. The State should ensure that recruitment of these teachers should be filled up before the start of the academic session of 2009-10. All vacancies in SPO and DPOs All posts have been filled in the The State should ensure would be filled up by July 2008. SPO, the posts in districts will filling up of all vacant also be filled on priority. posts in SPO and DPO by July 2009.______The report of the study on Teacher Report has been sent to MHRD Noted Absenteeism, conducted by SCERT, would be furnished to MHRD by April 2008.______10 Regarding teacher accountability The State has not systems and mechanisms, the State furnished any would: comments on the a. Provide information on whether teacher accountability. bye-laws/rules of VECs/PTAs have The State should take been amended to include specific immediate steps to clauses to monitor assessment of evolve proper systems parental satisfaction with children’s and mechanisms for the learning levels, fi-equency of parent same. teacher meets, sharing of children’s report card, class-work and homework. b. Provide details of the system for recording teacher attendance with inputs from the community and the
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 15 Block/district education officials, c. Provide details of the system for regular monitoring of Students’ attendance. 11 As per DISE (2006-07), there are As per DISE, 2007-08, there are The State has 5652 6601 single teacher schools in the 7789 single teacher schools. The single teacher schools State, which is 13.12% of the total number may have increased as at primary level and schools in the State. Except in Gyan large number of promotions has 376 at upper primary Jyoti schools with enrolment of 10 been done last year after over a level. Based on the children, all other single teacher decade, and the PS teachers on enrolment in schools, schools would be provided teachers promotion deployed in UPS the State should as per SSA norms. The PTR at schools. Large scale recruitment provide a second primary is 29:1 and at upper has also taken place in the last teacher in all the primary, it is 21:1, as per DISE year and is again going to be schools wherever (2006-07). This indicates that there done 2009-10. Rationalization necessary. is an urgent need for rationalization will be done along with. of teacher deployment.______12 The State would implement specific Specific programmes were Noted programmes for improving levels of initiated. Science and Maths learning of Maths and Science at culbs were initiated with Vigyan upper primary level with Prasar ‘('iiider Ministry of independent testing (i) to track Information and Technology), progress, (ii) to improve the teacher independent resource people training programmes and (iii) to were also used to train master facilitate remedial teaching. trainers for doing upper primary experiments. NCERT, vigyan prasar, APF and EDC science and maths CDs and books were also supplied to schools for providing additional material on the subjects.______The State would ensure constitution Instructions for the same were The State should take and regular meetings of the district given in the General Body immediate steps to committees of public representatives meeting too, for compliance by constitute the district set up to monitor SSA, vide GOI’s the districts. level committees as orders of August, 2007. envisaged in GOFs letter dated 29.08.2007 and hold quarterly meeting regularly._____
2. Introduction; The desk appraisal of the Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWP&B) for the year 2009-10 was undertaken by an Appraisal Team consisting of the following members: Shri. K.Gopalan, Ms. Deepti Bansal, Shri. Binay Pattanayak, Ms. Kalpana, Shri. S.C. Girotra, Shri. Shalender Sharma, Ms. Kiran Dogra, Dr. Anupriya Chadha, Shri. Jyoti Prakash Mohanty and Shri. Jitendre Kr. Panda; all from TSG.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 16 Chhattisgarh has a total geographical area of 1,35,194 sq. km. out of which 59,000 sq. km. is covered with dense forests. It has rich mineral reserves (limestone, quartzite, iron, bauxite, alexandrite, etc.) and a large tribal population. Chhattisgarh has, at present 18 districts, 146 tehsils and 146 community development blocks (including 85 Tribal development blocks). There are 110 towns whereas the total number of villages are ninteen thousand nine hundred and eighty two. In urban areas, the State has 6 Municipal Corporations, 20 Municipalities and 49 Nagar Panchayats. Chhattisgarh has three tier Panchayati Raj Institutions from the time of Madhya Pradesh.
Demographic Profile: The total population of the State is 2,12,92,439 (1,07,14,020 Male, 1,05,78,419 Female). The density of population of the State is 177 people per sq. km. But this goes down to a mere lowest of 33 people per sq. km. in Dantewara. Male population in the State is about 50.32% where as female population comes to 49.68%. The sex ratio for the State is 987 female per thousand male. This ratio is lowest in Dantewada district (916) and highest in Raipur (1019).
The majority of the urban population is concentrated around Durg and Raipur. The total percentage of urban population in the State is 20%. In urban area the total population is 42,62,989. The sex ratio for urban population is 951 female per 1000 male.
Chhattisgarh vs. India: General statistics at: a glance SNo. Particulars Chhattisgarh India 1 Pei capita Income (2004-05) at current prices (in Rs.) 15,073 23,222 ^ 2 Population in lacs (2001) 2.12 10286 3 Sex Ratio (number of females per thousand males) 987 933 (2001) 4 Percentage of Urban Population (2001) 25.67 % 27.78 % 5 Decadal grov^h rate of population (1991-2001) 18.06% 21.34% 6 Density of population per Sq. Km (2001). 154 325 7 Birth rate per thousand (2002) 25 25 8 Death rate per thousand. (2002) 8.7 8.1 9 Infant mortality rate per thousand (2002) 73 63 Infant mortality rate per thousand (2004) 60 58 10 Population below poverty line in % (1999-2C)00) Rural 45.09 % 27.09 % Urban 36.27 % 23.62 % 11 Literacy rate in percent (2001) 64.7 % 64.8 % Male 77.4 % 75.3 % Female 51.9% 53.7 % 12 Share of ST population in total (2001) 32.82 % 8.2 % Share of SC population in total (2001) 12.51 % 16.2% Other communities including backward classes 55.67 %
Literacy Profile: The literacy rate in the State is 65.12% (77.86% mali, 52.28% female). The lowest literate district in the State is in Dantewara (11.00%) and highest is in Rajnandgaon (77.58%).
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 17 ^Education Indicators: This section focuses on the significant indicators of elementary education. These include GER, NER, Dropout, repetition, retention and transition rates. The results of District-wise EDI have also been calculated at the National level ^ d EDI values for all the ^ tric ts have been provided phased upon all (16) districts analysis. Enrolment Ratio Children 6-l^ge group - clftflApefiT 11-14 age group Cohort Cohort District Overall Overall GER NER Drop GER NER Drop Repetition Repetition out out Bastar 104.85 99.89 4.27 5.32 103.65 99.87 8.24 11.76 Bijapur 79.00 94.00 40.00 71.00 41.00 90.00 15.00 49.00 Bilaspur 111.33 99.57 12.96 2.82 110.89 99.48 9.39 5.09 Dantewada 97.06 96.39 41.00 78.00 91.52 91.02 88.96 64.00 Dhamtari 104.95 99.52 4.52 4.52 101.44 99.53 6.36 6.04 Durg 102.37 99.74 5.16 9.78 102.08 99.57 7.96 11.06 Janjgir Champa 103.41 99.86 3.11 8.27 105.52 99.94 2.93 5.59 Jashpur 111.05 99.45 11.87 6.72 104.44 98.96 7.39 10.33 Kanker 101.68 98.99 5.81 9.61 98.30 98.52 4.69 14.36 Kawardha 100.42 99.71 2.81 7.19 99.75 98.92 2.46 2.49 Korba 100.11 99.94 8.89 4.88 100.80 99.90 11.64 8.69 Korea 11L31 99,99 1.58 0.94 114.30 98.01 3.20 3.48 Mahasamund 101.66 99.27 3.43 1.85 101.64 99.36 3.45 2.01 Narayanpur 103.71 99.67 6.35 7.32 103.58 99.59 16.22 14.14 Raigarh 103.17 99.94 4.70 10.80 102.80 99.93 3.74 12.73 Raipur 101.91 99.66 2.58 3.00 100.35 99.47 2.01 1.00 Rajnandgaon 103.09 99.99 10.86 8.44 101.50 99.97 8.51 6.66 Surguja 104.97 99.98 2.66 1.37 100.91 99.91 3.21 ^ 2.47 State 102.56 99.20 9.59 13.43 99.14 98.44 11.41 12.83 (Source: HHS updated data)
Educational Development Index (2007-08, All India) Apart from NUEPA, New Delhi, the State MIS has also computed the EDI with the help and guidance of MIS Unit, NUEPA, ND. Two workshops have been held at the State level and all the district and State MIS personnel have been given training by the NUEPA. The resource persons also illustrated the new features of DISE software and the new reports incorporated.
The State MIS has computed the District and Block level EDI and categorized them using Quartile method and used it to allocate the weak blocks and districts along with the gaps has to be filled.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 18 ^ stric t wise EDI Access Indicators, Index and Rank PRIMARY TO SCHOOLS PER DISTRICT % OF UNSERVED UPPER ACCESS SNo. 1000 RANK NAME HABITATIONS PRIMARY INDEX POPULATION RATIO I Bastar 6.71 2.68 2.86 0.67 7 2 Bilaspur 0.65 1.56 2.33 0.66 8 3 Dantewada 4.88 2.61 5.95 0.48 16 4 Dhamtari 0.00 1.60 2,01 0.72 6 5 Durg 0.13 1.15 1.93 0.62 13 6 Janjgir-Champa 4.44 1.54 1.92 0.56 15 7 Jashpur 0.52 2.56 3.40 0.81 -> 8 Kanker 5.91 2.85 2.94 0.73 (5 9 Kawardha 9.76 2.54 2.02 0.61 14 10 Korba 1.82 1.83 2.91 0.64 n 11 Korea 0.00 2.11 2.18 0.82 2 12 Mahasamund 1.02 1.68 2.81 0.64 n 13 Raigarh 0.41 2.08 2.26 0.79 4 14 Raipur 0.00 1.31 1.94 0.66 9 15 Rajnandgaon 3.50 1.90 2.36 0.64 10 16 Surguja 0.00' 2.73 2.40 0.94 1
Summary District-Rank Grade Relative status Surguja-1, Korea-2, Jashpur-3, Raigarh-4 A Good Kanker-5, Dhamtari-6, Bastar-7, Bilaspur-8 B Above average Raipur-9, Rajnandgaon-10, Korba-11, Mahasamund-12 C Below average Durg-13, Kawardha-14, Janjgir-Champa-15, Dantewada-16 D Require.attention
Infrastructure Indicators, Index and Rank % 0F % 0F %QF AVG SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS DISTRICT STUDENT WITHOtJT INFRASTRUCTURE SIno WITH WITH WITH RANK NAME CLASSROOM DRINKING INDEX SCR>60 COMMON GIRLS RATIO WATER TOILET TOILET FACILITY 1 Bastar 24.79 220 12.88 42.68 33.09 ' 0.732991440 2 2 Bilaspur 38.98 533 11.83 35.06 15.48 0.311204667 14 3 Dantewada 25.66 116 13.67 53.61 35.45 0.811910520 1 4 Dhamtari 35.94 145 17.13 30.85 15.53 0.341200428 13 5 Durg 40.37 490 8.72 35.58 12.26 0.355944040 12 Janjgir- 6 Champa 39.41 305 17.12 36.47 12.09 0.247838375 15 7 Jashpur 23.51 60 12.44 36.43 23.99 0.712720232 3 8 Kanker 21.51 28 14.79 40.84 9.95 0.611339131 5 9 Kawardha 34.68 182 14.32 32.52 15.01 0.409943016 10 10 Korba 29.63 110 11.52 40.98 14.29 0.592382988 6 11 Korea 27.77 61 12.26 43.49 18.56 0.659324389 4 12 Mahasamund 36.15 203 11.08 41.95 23.76 0.569037865 7 13 Raigarh 28.14 140 13.13 18.3^ 8.44 0.409245849 11
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 19 % 0F % 0F % 0F AVG SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS DISTRICT STUDENT WITHOUT INFRASTRUCTURE SIno WITH WITH WITH RANK NAME CLASSROOM DRINKING INDEX SCR>60 COMMON GIRLS RATIO WATER TOILET TOILET FACILITY 14 Raipur 39.59 660 14.12 33.86 10.75 0.169313965 16 15 Rajnandgaon 32.97 185 11.52 50.69 13.48 0.568688415 8 16 Surguja 26.82 278 16.60 28.39 18.32 0.425797715 9
Summan' District-Rank Grade Relative status Dantewada-1, Bastar-2, Jashpur-3, Korea-4 A Good Kanker-5, Korba-6, Mahasamund-7, Rajnandgaon-8 B Above average Surguja-9, Kawardha-lO, Raigarh-11, Durg-12 C Below average Dhamtari-13, BiIaspur-14, Janjgir-Champa-15, Raipur-16 D Reqpuire attention
Teachers Indicators, Index and Rank % 0 F % 0 F SCHOOLS SINGLE WITH >60 TEACHER % OF % 0 F % 0 F PUPIL- PUPIL- SCHOOLS SCHOOLS TEACHERS RANKIN DISTRICT FEMALE TEACHER TEACHR WITH >15 WITH <3- WITHOUT PROF. TEACHERS TEACHERS SNo. NAME TEACHERS RATIO RATIO STUDENT TEACHERS QUALIFICATION INDEX INDICATOR 1 Bastar 27.79 30.34 7.59 16.82 53.26 46.60 0.51 9 2 Bilaspur 31.92 32.22 3.87 1.07 30.60 26.% 0.86 1 3 Dantewada 26.45 24.37 4.69 23.64 58.69 9.26 0.53 7 4 D h^tari 28.83 38.84 13.88 11.15 48.86 19.32 0.51 8 5 Durg 29.61 39.06 9.89 4.12 30.43 24.11 0.72 4 Janjgir- 6 Champa 25.46 34.50 5.46 4.30 27.58 14.30 0.78 3 7 Jashpur 34.10 26.44 3.48 16.47 66.39 4.40 0.63 5 8 Kanker 26.67 24.49 1.68 10.94 58.97 42.36 0.61 6 9 Kawardha 26.85 “ 41.34 16.42 16.24 58.42 37.41 0.33 12 10 Korba 25.34 39.55 13.43 19.25 65.26 55.28 0.27 14 11 Korea 28.21 38.97 13.26 29.34 65.44 71.25 0.20 15 12 Mahasatnund 23.99 48.35 21.74 23.32 ; 63.06 10.51 0.16 16 13 Raigarh 23.49 32.11 8.72 15.59 66.66 40.45 0.38 -11 14 Raipur 32.02 31.64 3.52 3.77 28.42 31.91 0.86 2 15 Rajnandgaon 27.78 41.55 14.47 13.10 60.06 19.28 0.40 10 16 Surguja 27.% 35.89 12.04 23.85 66.27 35.16 0.32 13
Summary District-Rank Grade Relative status Bilaspur-1, Raipur-2, Janjgir-Champa-3, Durg-4 A Good Jashpur-5, Kanker-6, Dantewada-7, Dhamtari-8 B Above average Bastar-9, Rajnandgaon-10, Raigarh-11, Kawardha-12 C Below average Surguja-13, Korba-14, Korea-15, Mahasamund-16 D Require attention
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 20 Outeomes
OVER ALL GROSS GROSS GENDER PASS RANK GROSS ENR. ENR. PARITY DROP EXIT PASS PERCEN OUTCO IN ENR. RATIO RATIO INDEX REP. OUT CLASS PERCE T. WITH MES OUTCO DISTRICT NAME RATIO sc ST IN ENR. RATE RATE R.ATE NT. >60% INDEX MES Bastar 102.70 110.03 102.30 0.95 2.58 8.01 65.59 70.78 26.04 0.62 12 Bilaspur in.3i l!1.31 113.77 0.91 0.65 14.01 53.08 86r35 35.81 0.81 4 Dantewada 94.69 92.67 94.08 0.97 0.44 41.05 41.33 68.91 15.79 0.24 16 Dhamtari 105.01 104.05 106.64 0.99 9.42 4.95 81.70 98.19 56.89 0.82 -> Durg 106.92 106.77 106.70 0.95 5.00 6.25 83.74 89.56 39.19 0.80 5 Janjgir-Champa 104.23 104.69 105.74 0.95 7.11 4.25 65.96 90.17 59.90 0.76 6 Jashpur 112.21 113.34 111.35 0.96 6.89 5.56 61.95 89.62 42.67 0.86 1 Kanker 104.04 104.31 104.63 1,01 1!.43 5.87 58.32 88.85 24.18 0.62 13 Kawardha 100.08 100.17 100.09 0.96 7.76 3.72 48.78 84.34 27.21 0.51 15 Korba 100.22 100.36 100.14 0.93 4.49 9.40 66.51 79.56 30.31 0.55 14 Korea 10^.57 109.49 109.49 0.96 4.06 2.U 64.36 88.37 44.93 0.84 2 Mahasamund 104.24 105.70 102.69 0.98 9.65 3.09 79.13 88.60 39.14 0.71 8 Raigarh 104.12 104.57 104.75 0.96 5.63 6.30 71.32 ' 89.02 51.96 0.75 7 Raipur 102.37 102.79 104.67 0.96 8.68 2.50 68.88 86.87 48.03 0.68 II Rajnandgaon 103.16 104.38 103.12 0.98 9.15 11.53 75.81 92.34 41.68 0.69 10 Surguja 104.62 105.21 104.13 0.95 3.25 4.71 54.54 88.79 37.22 0.70 9
Summary District-Ranlc - Grade Relative status Jashpur-1, Korea-2, Dhamtari-3, Bilaspur-4 A Good Durg-5, Janjgir-Champa-6, Raigarh-7, Mahasamund-8 B Above average Surguja-9, Rajnandgaon-10, Raipur-11, Bastar-12 C Below average Kanker-13, Korba-14, Kawardha-15, Dantewada-16 D Require attention
The same has been calculated block wise (Annexure-II) and shared with the district personals and were instructed to improve their relative status and to share with block and cluster ftinctionaries.
Retention Rate, Dropout Rate, Transition Rate, Gender Gap (corrective measures to improve the indicator): Year wise dropout Rate is given below showing the trend of progress. In 2007-08 a special survey was made to capture the students absent for six month and was included in the dropout and were planned to cover in 2008-09. Those students have been covered through special coaching and NRBC and mainstreamed the district wiscLCurrent, status isj^iven below;
SNo. District Children 6-11 age group / Children 11-14 a<»e group 2004- 2005- 2006-^ 2007- 2008- 2004- 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 05 06 07 OS - 09 05 06 07 08 09 State 14.76 15.23 10.05 7.99 9.59 20.06 13.48 11.88 6.88 12.828 1 Bastar 13.32 7.18 3.76 7.08 4.27 20.39 10.45 5.23 15.42 11.76 2 Bijapur 40.59 40.00 14.84 49.00 j Bilaspur 12.04 9.77 55 14.01 12.96 36.97 11.84 64 lt:3 5.09 4 Dantewada 5.621 6.6 6.1. 42.43 41.00 9.46 11 13.91 11.29 64.00 5 Dhamtari 14.17 13.21 1L89 4.95 4.52 15.7 10.43 8.59 6.89 6.04 6 Durg 12.15 8.63 8.1 6.25 5.16 15.01 12.6 18.1 10.11 11.06 7 Janjgir Champa 21.88 5.96 3.74 4.25 3.11 12.81 14.76 12.21 5.31 5.59
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 21 8 Jashpur 9.44 14.29 4.23 5.56 11.87 9.69 8.41 9.64 5.41 10.33 9 Kanker 6.95 9.84 7.95 5.87 5.81 6.95 11.89 6.17 4.92 14.36 10 Kawardha 24.47 23.82 24.13 3.72 2.81 28.43 26.82 38.43 3.65 2.49 11 Korba 13.46 13 10.4 9.4 8.89 14.42 10 13.65 12.44 8.69 12 Korea *6.23 5.9 3.9 2.11 1.58 16.7 12.83 7.05 4.25 3.48 13 Mahasamund 22.63 19.8 17.07 3.09 3.43 23.65 20.02 19.77 9.03 2.01 14 Narayanpur 9.12 6.35 16.26 14.14 15 Raigarh 6.43 6.25 6.3 6.3 4.7a 12.87 8.13 7.5 7.5 12.73 16 Raipur 13.95 14.24 6.92 2.5 2.58 14.53 12.34 6.97 2.51 1.00 17 Rajnandgaon 12.16 12.97 12.35 11.53 10.86 24.75 15.87 15.74 8.71 6.66 18 Surguja 13.33 12.84 11.57 4.71 2.66 23.13 18.27 14.97 3.74 2.47 Source - House Ho d Survey updation 2008-09
I'he substantial decrease in dropout rate at primary level and increase in upper primary level is due to Naxalite activities in Bijapur, Dantewada, Narayanpur, Jashpur and Kanker districts and need special provisions to tame the increase in dropout rate other wise in the other districts it is controlled to significant level.
Retention rate for All, SC & ST at Primary and Upper Primary for 2007-08 is given below:-
Transition Rate from primary to 'SNo. District Completion Rate upper primary
1 Bastar 95.73 85.20 2 Bijapur 37.00 50.00 3 Bilaspur 86.68 95.78 4 Dantewada 38.00 56.00 5 Dhamtari 93.88 97.62 6 Durg 82.69 99.24 7 Janjgir Champa 91.73 100.30 8 Jashpur 92.28 95.35 9 Kanker 90.39 94.04 10 Kawardha 93.90 99.19 11 Korba 88.34 98.87 12 Korea 94.50 97.55 13 Mahasamund 97.31 99.29 14 Narayanpur 95.17 83.58 15 Raigarh 90.73 96.19 16 Raipur 94.89 96.90 17 Rajnandgaon 88.30 101.79 18 Surguja 86.89 96.45 Total 87.14 93.89
Dantewada and Bijapur have low completion and transition rates as they are badly affected by the naxalite problems.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 22 > District-wise Retention rate of Primary and Upper Primary (DISE 2007-08 Data)
District RR Primary RR Upper Primary Bastar 52.05 56.57 ^ • Bilaspur 63.19 83.95 Dantewada 40.40 62.19 Dhamtari 75.37 ' 78.99 Durg 82.88 85.92 Janjgir-Champa 74.24 88.23 Jashpur 70.53 82.91 Ranker 63.36 79.41 Kawardha 59.19 . i 73.81 Korba 66.20 69.80 Korea 73.18 84.71 Mahasamund 78.14 79.29 Raigarh 76.12 86.81 Raipur 68.40 78.28 Rajnandgaon 75.15 85.27 / Surguja 69.52 82.61 State 69.50
> District-wise Gender GPl, Repetition Rate, Exit Class Pass Percent^e^d Pass Percentage with more than 60% are> GENDER EXIT PASS DISTRICT PARITY REPETITION SNo. CLASS PASS % PERCENTAGE NAME INDEX IN RATE RATE WITH >60% ENROLMENT 1 Bastar 0.95 2.6 65.59 70.8 26.04 2 Bilaspur 0.91 0.7 53.08 86.3 35.81 3 Dantewada 0.97 0.4 41.33 68.9 15.79 4 Dhamtari 0.99 9.4 81.70 98.2 56.89 ------5 Durg 0.95 5.0 83.74 89.6 39.19 Janjgir- 6 Champa 0.95 7.1 65.96 90.2 ' 59.90 ------7 Jashpur 0.96 6.9 61.95 89.6 42.67 8 Kanker 1.01 11.4 58.32 88.9 24.18 9 Kawardha 0.96 7.8 48.78 84.3 27.21 10 Korba 0.93 4.5 66.51 79.6 30.31 11 Korea 0.96 4.1 64.36 88.4 44.93 12 Mahasamund 0.98 9.7 79.13 88.6 39.14 13 Raigarh 0.96 5.6 71.32 89.0 51.96 ------14 Raipur 0.96 8.7 68.88 86.9 48.03 15 Rajnandgaon 0.98 9.1 75.81 92.3 41.68 16 Surguja 0.95 3.3 54.54 88.8 37.22 1
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 23 %OF % OF % OF AVG SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS STUDENT SCHOOLS WITHOUT SNo. DISTRICT NAME WITH WITH CL ROOM WITH SCR>60 DRINKING COMMON RATIO WATER GIRLS TOILET TOILET FACILITY 1 Bastar 25 220 13 43 33.09 2 Bilaspur 39 533 12 35 15.48 3 Dantewada 26 116 14 54 35.45 4 Dhamtari 36 145 17 31 15.53 5 Durg 40 490 9 36 -12.26 6 Janjgir-Champa 39 305 17 36 12.09 7 Jashpur 24 60 12 36 23.99 8 Kanker 22 28 15 41 9.95 <> Kawardha 35 182 14 33 15.01 10 Korba 30 110 12 41 14.29 11 Korea 28 61 12 43 18.56 12 Mahasamund 36 203 11 42 23.76 13 Raigarh 28 140 13 18 8.44 14 Raipur 40 660 14 34 10.75 15 Rajnandgaon 33 185 12 51 13.48 16 Surguja - ______278 17 28 18.32
> District-wise Single Clas^^-fSe^m Schools is given below Upper Primary with Upper Primary Primary Primary State Total 1981 308 138 BASTER 148 55 31 BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 189 9 8 DANTEWADA 276 66 70 DHAMTARI 101 7 0 DURG j 158 12 0 JANJGIR - CHAMPA 104 8 9 ■JASHPUR 69 12 4 KANKER 16 0 KAWARDHA 138 50 4 KORBA 57 16 0 KORIYA 55 2 MAHASAMUND 203 2 4 RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH) 58 2 0 RAIPUR 211 20 8 RAJNANDGAON 77 12 SURGUJA 121 35
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 24 Schools with PTR > 70: > District-wise No. of schools with PTR > 70 is given below TPR>70 DIST. NAME PS PS with UPS UPS RASTER 184 16 17 BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 5S 2 9 DANTEWADA 57 5 0 DHAMTARI 107 0 28 DURG 127 1 85 JANJGIR - CHAMPA 76 0 17 JASHPUR 50 0 6 KANKER 16 0 2 KAWARDHA 179 0 14 KOREA 163 2 11 KORIYA 134 0 10 MAHASAMUND 269 1 34 RAIGARH (CHHATTISGARH) 154 0 12 RAIPUR 63 1 26 RAJNANDGAON 261 0 33 SURGUJA 512 0 31 Total 2410 28 - 335
TPR>100 DISTNAME PS PS with UPS UPS BASTER 74 7 9 BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 9 1 3 DANTEWADA 9 1 0 DHAMTARI 32 0 10 DURG 28 0 31 JANJGIR - CHAMPA 30 0 6 JASHPUR 13 0 2 KANKER 4 0 0 KAWARDHA 61 0 2 KOREA 55 0 3 KORIYA 51 0 3 MAHASAMUND 109 1 15 RAIGARH (CHHAniSGARH) 53 0 5 RAIPUR 11 1 4 RAJNANDGAON 97 0 13 SURGUJA 178 0 8 Total 814 11 114
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 25 MIS Activities in the State
1) Data Entry into Web Portal: All the districts have started data entry into the web portal. Data of Quarter-I have been entered and approved by 15 out of 18 districts and in the Quarter-II out of 18 districts 16 have started data entry. Districts have been instructed to enter the data of Quarter-Ill. Accordingly, districts have started entering data for Quarter-Ill. To speed up the process of data entry and data approval, workshop is proposed wherein district level Programmer and Accounts Officer will be called to the State Office to enter the data and to approve it.
2) Cavacitv Buildins: > District programmers are trained in using DISE software, generating various reports and analyzing data. > From 2008-09 data entry for DISE is being done at Block level through the data entry operator appointed under SSA. > Two day training programme on DISE nearly 62 data entry operator is completed. > Keeping in mind the difficulties in data entry at block level 146 posts of data entry operator has been proposed
3) Write-up on MIS activities
DISE: > Data collected from the school is 100% checked at cluster level, 10% at the black level. > In built validations are provided in the DISE software which validates enrollment data i.e. consistent enrollment is there for caste wise enrollment, age wise enrollment and medium wise enrollment. > Color coding provided in the DISE software which checks for coverage and consistency in the enrollment, classrooms, etc. > Consistency module is provided which checks for consistency and generates school wise reports where there is inconsistent data. > Separate query base module is developed, at state which checks the data of the districts for all parameters school wise reports of inconsistent data and no responses are generated which helps in correcting the data and making it 100% consistent. > 5% sample checking of 2008-09 data is being carried in four districts namely Bastar, Mahasamund, Rajnandgaon and Surguja through independent agency appointed by districts. > 5% sample checking in the State is being carried out through the State Office.
PMIS: Software for PMIS in developed in house at the State level. PMIS Software is shared with the district which is used for collecting information on physical and financial achievement of SSA. Every month activity and sub-activitywise physical and financial information from district is collected which is consolidated at the state level. Report generated through PMIS is then submitted to Govt, of India and Govt, of Maharashtra.
IV) NCERTMonitorins Tools: Software for SLf-1 & LF-3 of NCERT Monitoring tools is developed in house. Through this software data entry of SLf-1 & SLf-3 is done at the block level. This data is consolidated at the district level, cluster level, block level and district level reports are generated through this report. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 26 An online application has been developed by State MIS to capture data schools wise and analytical reports were also developed to monitor the trend in academic achievements.
Calendar of Activities:
Plan of Action for 2008-09 Time Period DISE Planning 20/8/2008 (One day) District level Training 26/8/2008 (One day) Block level Training 30/8/2008 Cluster level Training 30/9/08 to 03/10/08 (4 day) Filling up of EMIS formats by Head master / Teacher / Staff and submission to Cluster Head. 10/10/2008 (One day) 100% Checking of EMIS formats by the Cluster head and are submitted to Block Education Officer. 12/10/2008 to 13/10/2008 Block Education Officer ensure that EMIS formats are (One day) filled up by all the schools and formats are received from all the schools 10% checking of EMIS formats are being checked by BEO. 14/10/2008 to 02/11/2008 Data entry of all the EMIS formats are done at block (One day) level by the data entry operators appointed under SSA 01/11/2008 to 02/11/2008 Data from block level is then submitted at district level. Data consistency is checked at district leveL 03/11/2008 to 07/11/2008 If the error occurs is being corrected and the merging of data is done at district level. From 15/11/2008 Computer programmer from district office to submit the onwards final district data to the state office
5) PISE Data Dissemination Strate2ies: > Data submitted by 16 districts is analyzed at the state level. > Reports generated on same important parameters are prepared and shared with district programmer. > Ambiguity in the data if any is shared with the district programmer. > Reports on single teacher school are shared with district for rationalization of the deployment of teacher. > Reports on schools with high and low PTR (Pupil Teacher Ratio) are generated for deployment of teacher. > District level functionaries share the data with the block offices. > Instructions are issued to district to generate the school report card and share it with schools.
6) Data Sharing: State level sharing workshop is held once in a year. State level and district level analysis is share with the district programmer. Outcomes on various parameters is share with the district especially on single teacher school, schools with high PTR and low PTR, Dropout Rate, Repetition Rate etc. District Programmer in turn share the data with the Block Education Officer and Block Co-ordinator. State level Analysis reports are shared with the district at the State level sharing workshop. Block report cards are also generated at the State level which is shared with
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 27 all District and Block Officers. Hosting of online DISE Reports in the official web site of Govt, of Chhattisgarh, so that any user can view or download the reports to suit their purpose.
7) Calculation of EDI at State (Districtwise) and district (Blockwise) level: District and block-wise data for four parameters 1) Access 2) Infrastructure 3) Teacher 4) Outcomes indicator is extracted from DISE 2007-08 data. Data from the DISE 2008-09 on the above indicator will be extracted once the data for 2008-09 is finalized. Workshop is scheduled at the State level to calculate Districtwise and Blockwise EDI. Chief Consultant, MIS, TSG- Ed.CIL and System Analyst, NEUPA will be invited to help us out calculate the Districtwise and Blockwise EDI.
8) 5% Samvle Checkine: 5% Sample checking of DISE 2009-10 data by an independent agency (Rojgar Samanwayak of NREGA).
9) Distribution and Discussion on School Revort Cards: Districts were instructed to issue the school report card for 2007-08 to all schools from where the data was collected. This year, it will be made mandatory to distribute school report card for 2008-09 to all schools.
15) Staff Position: Level Sanctioned In position Vacant Programmer 16 16 0 Data Entry Operator 48 42 6
16) Hardware / Software / Internet connection: All the districts have got the Hardware, software & Internet connection in place.
4. Components wise Appraisal: Under each of the topics below, the pattern to be followed in general should be: first the progress made till last year, then the current proposals and followed by the analysis of the comments.
(I) Access
State policy on opening of new schools • Primary schools within one km reach with 40 children. • New Gyanjyoti schools with 10 children of target age group in tribal areas. • New Upper Primary for two Primary and on availability of 40 children following the three km norms. • Norms are relaxed in specific cases like opening schools in scarcely populated tribal areas with 10 children minimum instead of 25
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 28 • Availability of Schooling facilities:
Table: Information on Schools Category Govt. Aided Private Total Primary 32457 380 3498 36335 Up. Primary 13027 165 2226 15418
The state plan indicates to have 51753 primary and upper primary schools in total, of these 70% are Primary and 30 % are upper primary schools.
Of the total Primary schools, 90% are Govt, and aided schools similarly in the case of total Upper primary schools 85% UPS are Govt, and aided schools.
• Status of opening of new primary schools sanctioned till 2008-09 under SSA.
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Total 99 4962 1327 1066 1414 399 9 9276
The above table indicates that in state, 9276 Primary school has been sanctioned so far under SSA. 9 PS were sanctioned during 2008-09. The state-representative informed that all the PS have been completed.
The state has given the district wise coverage of habitation with PS which is given below:
Table: Habitation and Access (Primary) V) Im B Ta in Oh <2 JS Im Habitations Covered V cu u es O "a 9 ’■*3 < ■2 I z e +-IC3 by (U tm Id I t .s «« 42a 03 ae« u§ n g . i d ’u s o "SIM O Z, (U w B c u 2 S O A CO o Govt. & £ .S V) a. o EGS a o (n Q_ 6 Govt. Aided .1 t U 5 Z (within Oi -2 ^ -5 a, KM £ PS (within 1 «*• a „ ct O 2 1 KM) o X3 .■t; « ■»-» o o KM) C3 2 d 6 a n Z d H Z a Z 1 Bastar 3335 3168 0 2853 167 0 167 714 0 2 Bijapur 2289 2142 0 835 147 0 147 348 0 3 Bilaspur 2932 2903 0 2557 29 0 29 150 0 4 Dantewada 2917 2810 0 1449 107 0 107 1071 0 5 Dhamtari 913 913 0 908 0 0 0 0 0 6 Durg 2318 2307 0 2306 11 0 11 221 0 7 Janjgir-Chanipa 1667 1593 0 1625 74 0 74 1390 0 8 Jashpur 2891 2891 0 1870 0 0 0 0 0 9 Ranker 1947 1832 0 1605 115 0 115 134 0 la Kawardha 1128 1017 0 1054 111 0 111 465 0 11 Korba 2036 1999 0 1572 37 0 37 0 0 12 Korea 1811 1811 0 1018 0 0 0 0 0 13 Mahasamund 1378 1365 0 1343 13 1 12 547 1 14 Narayanpur 377 288 0 417 89 0 89 540 0 15 Raigarh 2666 2666 0 2097 0 0 0 0 0
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 29 CZJ s 'a (/) eu JS .2 Habitations Covered T3 5 6 .Si > O (/J on O Z Cm o
The above data indicates that out of 41500 total habitations, 40531 (97%) are served by the 32837 PS facilities. Only 969 habitations are without PS facilities, out of these only 1 habitation is eligible for PS as per state norm.
The state has proposed to start 01 primary school in Mahasamund district.
The state representative informed that in Mahasamund district^ 13 out of 1378 habitations don’t have primary schools facility but 12 covered with near by PS and UPS. Only 1 habitation Ambedkar Nagar (Suwarmar) in Bagbhara block is deprived of educational facility within 2.4 KM. There afe 43 children in this habitation who are enrolled in near by Schools.
The education dept of state also justifies this proposal.
Recommendation Considering the eligible habitation for PS, the proposal is recommended before the PAB.
B. EGS Table: Status of EGS District Total number of EGS No. of EGS completing 2 years functioning or more in 2009-10 EGS centers have been upgraded into primary school
Table: Upgradation of EGS No. of EGS functioning Reasons No. No. of No. of In the In the Total for not proposed EGS to EGS to habitations habitations proposing for up be be eligible for not eligible for the gradation continued closed PS for PS balance Not Applicable
Avvraisal Revort Chhattis^arh 2009 -10 Paee 30 C. Upper Primary
Status of opening of new Upper primary schools sanctioned till 2008-09 under SSA
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Total 111 703 778 1830 2568 446 25 7121
The above table indicates that in state, 7121 Upper Primary school has been sanctioned so far under SSA.
25 UPS were sanctioned during 2008-09. The state representative informed that all the UPS have been completed.
The status of upper primary schools and eligible habitations for opening UPS as per distance and population norms are as follow:
Table: Habitation and Access (Upper Primary)
3 « ^ _ C8 V. c (» ^ lU .5 1 " S a g E a . — 2 Vi (/> O « w - 1 'C C3 Om j s 5 1 1 PU P *Ja
• Out of 41500 habitations, 40187 (97%) habitations are served be upper primary schools within 3 km.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 31 • The ratio of primary to upper primary schools is 2.5:1 • Out of 1314 ineligible habitation for UPS, 220 are fulfilling Upper primary school norms. « As far as gap between primary and upper primary school is concerned State has wide gap o f3256.
Considering distance/ populations norms and the existing gap between Primary and Upper Primary State has proposed up gradation of 398 primary schools into Upper Primary.
In terms of eligible habitations and Gap District Bastar, Kanker, Kawardha, Mahasamund and Narayanpur are proposing up gradation of Primary into Upper Primary, whereas the districts like Dantewada, Korba, Korea and Rajnandgaon is not following the eligible criteria for opening UPS but as these districts having larger gaps of UPS so considering this fact the state has proposed UPS to achieve at least the ratio of 3:1.
Observations & Recommendation: The state plan indicated that in Dantewada district, there is no concept of integrated villages in every ward/tola/para there are 4-5 children in average. The provision of UPS for such mare no. is seems unsubstantial. That’s why the Residential schools are in need.
Moreover, In the latter (D.O. No. 43/Dantewada/ NCPCR/2008/PD dated 27.01.09) issued to Chattisgarh Govt, by national commission for the protection of child rights also indicates 4000D children who are OOSC which would indicate that there is a requirement for the construction of 400 new ashram schools with the capacity of 100 children each. This requires substantial contribution of the SSA along with the department for Tribal affairs especially of the central govt, to fund this initiative.”
However the state has proposed the Building cost of 61 Ashram shala( Residential Schools) under civil work head in order to provide education to the OOS children. The recurring cost will be assist by the Tribal welfare dept such as teacher salary, contingencies etc.
The district wise proposals of building for ashramshala are as follow:
Districts No. of residential Unit cost for Total Schools building Dantewada 39 53.57 lakh 642.84 Bijapur 12 53.57 lakh 2089.23 Kankar 1 53.57 lakh 53.57 Narayanpur 7 53.57 lakh 374.99 Surguja 2 53.57 lakh 107.14 Total 61 3267.77
Though the state does not fulfil the norm for opening Residential schools, but these schools are proposed in the naxalite affected areas where naxalites destroying the PS/UPS schools building as they feel that these building will be used by the CRPF’S and other Armed forces The naxalite don’t have the problem with Ashram Shala.
In these districts the OOSC are high as compare to the other districts of state.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 32 The state representative informed that these residential school/ Ashram shala will be opened in the outer part of the villages where the transportation facilities can be available.
Keeping this view, the proposal of building for 61 Residential schools in the above mentioned districts is recommended before the PAB.
In the districts of DanteWada, Kobra, Korea, Rajandgaon Narayanpur, the state has not fulfilling the norm of Opening UPS as per distance and population. So the proposal of opening UPS in these districts is not recommended before the PAB.
Considering the existing primary and upper primary ratio and eligible habitations for UPS as per state norm, 190 UPS are recommended before the PAB.
The district wise recommendations against the proposal are listed below: No of No. of Habitation eligible Recommendation District UPS as per distance & before the PAB proposed population norms Bastar 152 142 142 Dantewada 120 0 0 Kanker 33 53 33 Kabirdham 5 15 5 Korba 40 0 0 Korea 16 0 0 Mahasamund 5 5 5 Narayanpur 12 5 5 Rajnandgaon 15 0 0 Total 398 220 190
C. Interventions for Out of School Children
Progress in AIE Target Achievement Achievement % Intervention Fin Fin Phy. Phy. Phy. Fin (in Lakhs) (in Lakhs) NRBC(P) 22331 275.788 15654 190.96711 70.10 - 69.24 NRBC(UP) 14266 379.476 7438 164.33616 52.14 43.31 Seasonal Hostel for migrants 1131 76.908 1131 56.668 100.00 73.68 Tribal Dormitories (Residential) 1200 99.48 1200 88.824 100.00 89.29 RBC(P) 31573 2146.96 15105 1023.8451 47.84 47.69 RBC(UP) 15271 1038.43 9372 539.6316 61.37 51.97 Total 85772 4017.04 49900 2064.27197 58.18 51.39
The above data indicates that the state has covered only 58% of the target during 2008-09. The financial coverage is also low (51%).
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 33 The state representative informed that some of the children targeted for enrolled in ATE during 2008-09 have been directly enrolled in the schools without giving them any bridging.
The District wise coverage of identified! OOSC during 2008-09 is as follow:
c ^ 4 ) *0 ■“ u cn 6 f o0*0£ i 3,5 ^ ® 5 O «
In total out of 169753 OOSC identified during 2008-09, 6j % are directly enrolled and 28% are covered under AIE. Rest of the 9% are remained uncovered which will be covered in the proposal of 2009-10.
In the Korba district no child is covered under AIE
Table: Status of Out of School Children 2009-10 Age in 2008-09 Uncovered children New Identified OOSC as years Grand Total from last year per survey * 1 Total B G Total B G Total B G BG Total 6-10 51064 51835 102899 4197 4380 8577 17251 18302 35553 21178 22952 44130 11-14 33830 33024 66854 3662 3798 7460 10471 10293 20764 14133 14091 28224 Total 84894 84859 169753 7859 8178 16037 27722 28595 56317 35311 37043 72354
The state representative informed that the house hold was done during 2006 by regular school teachers. After that updation is done twice in a year (Oct & April).
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 34 " The OOSC reported by the state is based on Oct. 2009-10 survey updation & as per the compilation of cluster wise information regarding OOSC during AWP&B 2009-10.
The state has reported 72354 out of school children for the year 2009-10 by decrease in 57% of OOSC reported during 2008-09. Out of these 51% are Female OOSC.
The out of school children are high in the age group of 6-10 years which is 61% of total OOSC identified during 2009-10.
The state representative informed that the Radio programme is being started from Oct. 2008-09 in the state to identify the OOSC. In the programme the telephone no. of concerned person is passed on at large level so that any one can communicate regarding existence of OOSC or recent dropouts in their area. After receiving call, concern person takes the immediate action to cover such children.
The following graphs indicate the decrease in OOSC in the state:
Out of School Children - Chhattisgarh
1697S 3
20000
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
6 -1 0 y e a rs 11-14 years T otal
As per data available high concentration of OOSC is found w.r.t SC/ST OOSC in Dantewada & Bijapur districts which is 44% of total OOSC in the state.
In the district of Mahasamund (133 increased) & Narayanpur (47) the OOSC has increased from last year (all of these children are dropouts).
In Durg (230) and Raigarh the NE OOSC has increased frgm last year.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 35 Social category wise OOSC figures for 2009-10:
Category 2008-09 2009-10 Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total SC 8402 854J 16943 4432 4772. 9204 ST 49002 47927 96929 '20861 21297 42158 Minority 2078 2166 . .4244 705 707 1412 ' Others 25412 26225- 51637 9313 10267 19580 Total 84894 84859 169753 35311 37043^ 72354
The above data indicates substantial decrease in .the OOSC social categ()ry wise during 2009-10. But while analyzing the OOSC status at district level from 2008-09 to 2009-10-, ho. of OOSC has increased in some districts such as:
In the district of Mahasamund (129 increased) & Narayanpur (75) the SC OOSC has increased from last year.
Similarly in the case of ST OOSC Mahasamund (68 increased) & Narayanpur (243) and Dhamtari (11) districts shown increase in number of ST OOSC from last year.
In the district of Dhamtari, Kankar, Mahasamund & Narayanpur male ST OOSC has increased and in the district of Kawardha, Mahasamund. & Narayanpur female OOSC has increased from last year.
The data on the Minority OOSC in some district was not available during 2008-09. This time the district having substantial no. of Minority OOSC are Bastar (486), Surguja (224), Korba (204).
Following graph shows the existence of OOSC with respect of reasons during 2009-
No. of out of school children with reasons
Lack of Interest 8%
Lack of Access 3%
House hoW work 22%
Non flexibility in cnool timing and ystem of school (ufgration ^*^0010 cultural 3% reasons Failure Earning 2% 7% compulsion 18%
The state representative informed that following Intervention are proposed for specially SC/ST/Minority OOSC
Appraisal Report Chhattisgnrh 2009 -10 Page 36 • Seat increase in TWD Ashrams for the children of access less habitations. • Priority will be given for Admission in existing KGBV for the girls belonging to this category. • 17 New Night Shelter will be started for the out of school children belonging to Urban Areas and who are engaged in working, for their livelihood. • Cost free residential facility will be provided in dormitory. • Joint efforts by various departments. • Use of mother-tongue in the class as per requirement
The following table shows the progress and proposal on mainstreaming of OOSC
Table: Progress & Mainstreaming on ■o « .s c a> .S c ^ o ^ 1 s U 1 - U 1 Bastar 8495 8495 7103 5680 2 Bijapur 4956 4956 8870 7093 3 Bilaspur 10812 10812 2093 1670 4 Dantewada 2037 2037 9807 7841 5 Dhamtari 1805 - 1678 727 580 6 Durg 5055 5055 2287 1829 7 Janjgir-Champa 569 100 596 473 8 Jashpur 1948 1948 758 601 9 Kanker 506 237 699 553 10 Kawardha 2541 1865 1473 1172 11 Korba 0 0 1633 1299 12 Korea 971 947 374 292 13 Mahasamund 749 749 1014 807 14 Narayanpur 1460 1460 2529 2019 15 Raigarh 1088 1088 849 676 16 Raipur 904 404 1500 1197 17 Rajnandgaon 950 950 509 404 18 Surguja 2723 2723 4742 3791 Total 47569 45504 47563 37977
During 2008-09, the state has enrolled 47569 children under AIE out of which 95% children are mainstreamed. This year also the state proposed to mainstream 80% of new Identified children who will be enrolled in AIE.
The state representative informed that the continued children will be mainstreamed by 6 months.
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 37 Mainstreaming strategies:
The state representative informed that before 2-3 years back, the drop out rates of the child is high who was mainstreamed from AIE centre.
Keeping this view, the state proposed to open RBC and NRBC with the linkage of Ashram shala & regular schools.
During state level executive meeting held on 28. 3.2008, the state has decided to involve the head master/superintendent of ashram shala/regular schools to monitor the AIE activities. They will be responsible to mainstream a child into regular premises and will supervise the work of EVs. For these responsibilities, they will be paid as intensive (maximum Rs 2000/ month) under the AIE running cost.
After mainstreaming a child into regular schools, if required remedial teaching will also be provided by these head masters.
The state has increase seats in Ashram shala for the enrollment of OOSC who have come from the AIE centres.
This year also the state demands 744 extra seats in Ashram Shala under SC/ST Innovation head and 255 seats under Girls education during 2009-10.
Child Tracking System: The state representative informed that though there is instruction from above management to see /follow the child if he/she is not going to schools from more than 5 days. But in ground reality lack of initiatives is observe in some districts/blocks this regards and if the child is tacked in some blocks /district, the data on it is not available.
The state will follow below said steps for child tracking system: • Village committees will be empowered for bringing all children in schools and their regular attendance. • Proper attention to the readmission cases after dropouts • Extra coaching/ remedial measures for long absentee and mainstream • Regular meeting with parents & seek suggestions from them
Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 38 Detail breakup of proposed strategies for OQSC along with unit cost for 2009-10 is as follow: Os o CA 1 -2 .2 oc» u ’S o E o. s •- ’O s. 6 V ’C a s CJ (J C TS « J Z W 3 Vh c/> -o o 3 JS o e E 2 §■ - ■o o c5 In total, the state has proposed to cover 47325 new identified children and 4396 continued children from last year. Under the AIE Intervention the state has proposed 49894 OOSC under various interventions rest of other will be covered under other head. The state representative informed that still 9074 OOSC will remain uncovered as these children are in Naxalite affected areas which are difficult to enroll. These children are residing in the naxalite affected blocks of Dantewada & bijapur district. The state representative informed that as soon as these children will be identifies the state Vv^ill give the supplementary plan for their coverage. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 39 Detail briefing of the activities proposed for the 2009-10 to cover Out of school children is given below: Dakhila Abhiya: Continuous enrolment drive in the month of May to September will be organized by every district. The state representative informed that this year, teachers from Anganbadi to Upper Primary will sit together in the month of May-June to develop and implement strategies to ensure 100% enrolment, retention and transition. AIE Centres for children enrolled in unrecognized Madrasas/ Maktabs: Children studying in unrecognized madrasas and maktabs in Bijapur, Dantewada Kawarha, Narayanpur, Rajnandgaon and Raigarh districts will be taken into the Alternative Innovative Education Scheme. These children will undergo bridge course syllabus, and all efforts to enlighten and motivate, like organizing special sessions with the help of learned scholars/influential persons/role models from their community to be take up to impart modem education. Enrolling children in KGBV Special drives would be organized to enroll 11-14 age group girls who have left the school after passing out class 5 or dropped out of the upper primary level system, in the existing KGBV. Also special efforts would be done to fill up all the vacant seats in the residential schools of tribal welfare and school education department. Regular attendance strategies: This year, state is doing some piloting to increase attendance of students. BRCCs and CACs shall be oriented in this direction and their accountability ascertained in checking absentees. All the recommendations made by districts will be implemented to ensure regular attendance. Dormitories for migrant families and SC/ST Children: Children out of school from Raipur, Mahasamund, kabirdham, Janjgir, Champa, etc due to seasonal migration of parents would be provided lodging and boarding in existing dormitories of the districts. This would help them pursue their schooling without any obstacle. Similarly the out of school children belonging to SC/ ST communities and who are out of school due to migration and other reason will be covered by the existing dormitories build for them. These dormitories require recurring cost. Keeping in mind the success of these dormitories. Night Shelters: Urban deprived children of Raipur, Durg, Janjgir, Bilaspur and Raigarh, Korba, Bastar, Surguja, who are out of school would be mainstreamed by Night shelters. Besides providing academic inputs, these leaming centers also provide shelters, food and other facilities. The teachers would be trained and equipped with child psychology and motivational strategies. Programmes for identifying their hidden talents and vocational education will also be framed. Night shelters of Durg and Mahasamund district would cover out of school children of Dewar community while in Kawardha district “sawariya dera” would cover sawariya community children who are out of school 36 Night shelters opened in last few years have been proposed to be converted into Residential Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 40 Bridge Courses and this year, total 17 new night shelters are proposed from Urban Deprived Children fund under innovation. Organizing NRBCs /RBCs: These bridge courses will help them to attain age appropriate learning level and promote further schooling. This year all NRBCs are opened connected to regular schools and RBCs connected to Ashram Shala so that the students of RBCs and NRBCs may enter in regular school easily. Convergence with Other Dept / Agencies to Cover OOSC: Jan pahal- A public initiative: Last year, state initiated Jan Pahal in selected districts with the help of State Literacy Mission and funded by European Commission. This Abhiyan is mainly to bring children back to school, regular attendance & community to take initiatives for the education of children. One block in each district will be identified to implement this initiative. Samtulyata Program: This is also implemented by Literacy Mission and OOSC are identified in the villages and a tutor is made available to coach such children and they are facilitated to appear in exams. On passing the exams they are motivated to join regular school or any other stream to continue their education. Strengthening ashram shalas: Studies reveal that many children are out of school due to lack of schooling facility in nearby areas. Such children would be enrolled in ashram shalas. SSA will provide additional class room from civil works budget head and Rs. 4500/- per child grant from innovation head for procurement of bedding, utensils and other requirement to accommodate these additional children. Tribal Department will sustain rest of the things. NGOs Invoh^ement: "As per III QPR 2008-09, 8 NGOs (Kar Kamal Sewa Sansthan, Swtantra Veer Sawarkar Sewa Samiti, Shruti Mahila Samiti, Pratibha Munch, Clean Green, Gramin Vikas Kendra, Gaumukhi, Ram Krishnan Mission Ashram) are working in the area of Durg, Raipur, Kankar, Jashpur, Korba etc. to run the RBC and NRBC. The state representative informed that the state has decided to involve only those NGOs who has done the remarkable work during last year. After assessing the work of above said NGOs, same will be continuing for running NRBC and RBC in the state during 2009-10. The III installment of SSA will only be released to selected NGOs only after when they mainstreamed the 75% Children enrolled in their RBC/NRBC. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 41 Implementation plan of Strategies proposed during 2009-10 SNo. Month Proposed Activity April 2009 Identification and listing of OOSC as per household survey. Selection of Schools for non residential bridge course and Residential Ashrams for the establishment of residential bridge course Centres. Identification and deputation of EV within the panchayat with the help of community. Monitoring in existing RBC and NRBC centers. Development and Printing of Educational Materials/ guidelines. Training of teachers, superintendent of selected schools and Training of selected EV. Verification of list from other authorities and staff. Awareness campaign programme/ jingle through radio programme^ starting from April 2009 continuing for next two/three months. Special bill will be passed in every gram shaba (14^^ April 2009 to 20**^ April 2009) for sending children of their village to regular schools. Appointment of Mobile Teacher for HBE. Migration mapping and identification of OOSC May 2009 Starting of NRBC and RBC in government schools and Ashrams. Night Shelter for Urban deprived children will be started in connection with School or Ashram fiinctioning in Urban Areas. Allocation of first installment for maintenance and management of centers. Monitoring of Centers from May 2009 to next two months. Awareness campaign for the motivation of community. Administrative order against the seat increase of existing Ashrams under innovation. Procurement of mattress, bedding and utensils for Residential bridge course and for existing Ashrams against seat increment. Procurement of Uniform and Educational Kit for the Children of RBC. Continuation of Radio Programme. Identification of Children requiring HBE______June 2009 Continuation of Centre started in May 2009. Regular monitoring of Centres by District and State Officials. Enrollment drive and campaigns through Radio programme. Assessment of Children enrolled in NRBC/RBC. Meeting of State Grant in Aid committee for identification of Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 42 NGO. • Continuation of Radio Programme. 4 July 2009 • After assessment in June, special enrollment drive “Shala Pravesh Utsav” will be organized. • Enrollment of Dropout children, with lack of access in the Ashrams against seat increment. • Mainstreaming the Children studying in NRBC to regular schools after 16**’ July 2009. • Admission of children studying in RBC against vacant seat of KGBV and Ashrams. • Mobilization of community throughout the month by organizing panchayat sammelan. • Preparation of MOU for NGO, if required. 5 August 2009 • Special enrollment drive for the out of school children to take admission in regular school. • Admission of children studying in RBC against vacant seat of KGBV and Ashrams. • Monitoring by Panchayat to ensure cent percent enrollment. • Monitoring of schools and Ashrams by State and District Officials. • Form filling and submission for quarterly board examination foi the children continuing from previous year. 6 September 2009 • Encouraging community participations in community training programme. • Continuation of enrollment drive. • Preparation of examination by remedial teaching and coaching classes. • Monitoring of centers by State and District Officials. 7 October 2009 • Conducting HHS for identification of OOSC after closing admissions in regular schools after 30^ September 2009. • Listing and confirming of new OOSC identified. • Identification of New centres to be started if required. • Continuation and Quality Programme will be organized in October 2009. • Monitoring. 8 November 2009 • Life skill and educational tour for the children enrolled continuing in centers. • Training of EV. • Migration mapping and identification of children. • Starting new centers if required. • Monitoring. 7 December 2009 • Assessment of children studying in centers by examination. • Remedial teaching for weak children. • Allocation of next installment for continuing centers. • Monitoring. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 43 7 January 2010 • Review meeting for the progress made so far. • Continuation and Quality Programme will be organized in January 2010. • Monitoring. 7 February 2010 • Preparation and special coaching of academic examination. • Listing and confirming of new OOSC identified. • Identification of New centres to be started if required. • Monitoring. 7 March2010 • Conduction of evaluation test and issue of certificates. « Continuation of existing centers. Monitoring Mechanism: 1. Monthly Progress Review meeting of District AIE coordinators will be conducted at the State level. 2. Assessment and review of target and achievement of OOSC for BRC supervisor along with block coordinators and cluster coordinators. 3. Weekly progress review of AIE centers for OOSC interventions at Block level. 4. Monthly review of child tracking and monitoring of the mainstreamed children and conduct of remedial teaching to the needy children. 5. Monthly monitoring by State and District level Officials. • 6. Two visit in every month for BRC and CRC to the centres. Initiative to insure quality in AIE centre: • The attendance register is maintained by EVs and verifies on monthly basis by Head Master/ CRCs level • The profile of every child is maintained • The case histories are also maintained for sharing purpose • For the well being of child, health checkup is done every months • Quarterly evaluation Test is done to assess the knowledge of child. • Friendly environment is provided by EV’s even in case of any inaccuracy and irregularly from child side. • The EVs are given training for 10 days each year to make them competent enough to deal the child. The Diet and SCERT also invited in the teacher training as a resource person. • In these training, child perception is also taken into account for appropriate strategies. Financial break up of Strategies proposed during 2009-10: Residential Camp - Break up of Expenditure 2009- 2010 Per child cost Per centre cost for 40 Items children @ Rs. 10000 per child Teachers Salary (2 Teachers) Rs.1200 2000*2*12= Rs. 48000 Salary for Cook, Watchman and Helper (2 Rs. 900 1500*2*12= Rs. 36000 Persons) Meals Rs. 5400 450*40*12= Rs. 216000 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 44 Per child cost Per centre cost for 40 Items children @ Rs. 10000 per child Writing Materials (Pencil, Crayons, Eraser) Rs.300 300*40= Rs. 12000 Notebooks & Study Material Mat, Pillow, Towel, Bed Sheet Rs.200 Rs.80000 EVs Training Rs.375 Rs. 15000 Other contingencies Rs.1625 Rs. 6500 Total Rs. 10000 Rs. 400000 Noil-Residential Bridge Course - breakup of Expenditure 2009-10 (for a period of 12 Months) Per child Per centre cost for 20 children Items cost @ Rs. 3000 per child Teachers Salary (2 Teachers) 1200 2000*l*12=Rs.24000 Writing & Study Materials Study Material 200 200*20=Rs. 4000 Pencil, Crayons, Eraser, 100 100*20=Rs. 2000 Rs. Notebooks 14500 School Bag 175 l75*20=Rs. 3500 Uniform 250 250*20=Rs. 5000 Exposvffe visit 500 5DD*20=Rs. 10000 EVs Training 38 75*10 days* l=Rs. 750 Other contingencies (Electricity, 537 'Rs. 10750 water. Monthly meetings) Total Rs. 3000 Rs. 60000 Observation & Recommendation: The dropouts OOSC are more than the Never Enrolled which is 78%. That clearly indicates that the state is not doing many efforts to enrolled child into AIE centre first. During 2008-09 also the state has directly enrolled 62% irrespective of their age and knowledge. State is advised to enroU the child as per their age of 6 to 7/8 years, after attaining the age of 8 years, the child should first given some bridging before enrolment in regular school. The state has reported 61 % of the OOSC in the age group of 6-10 years in 2009-10. The state is advised to develop more specific strategies as per their age to cover such children. While discussion, it also found that 1 person is looking after 3-4 components of SSA which lead overload and the person may not give proper attention towards alternative schooling or SC/ST activities. Though the state has reported a decrease of 57% in the OOSC reported this year. But at district level OOSC number has increased in general as well as social category wise in some district especially in Mahasamund and Narayanpur districts. The state are advise to focus such districts first while implementing the SSA activities. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 45 Dantewada and Bijapur districts have highest OOSC which accounts 44 % of total OOSC in the state. Still 9074 children will be left without any strategies under AIE. The state has shown the 95% mainstreaming during 2008-09, but after mainstreaming no child tracking system is regularized the state. The state has not maintained any records in this regard. The state are advise to evolve the child tracking system as soon as possible. The state has also not done any migration mapping even after instructions given during PAB 2008-09, to do comprehensive migration mapping including the children from Dantewada and Bijapur districts to the Khammam districts of A.P. Recommendations: Keeping in view the state coverage during 2008-09, the appraisal team has recommended following targets to cover children under AIE activities for 2009-10. B c« M l B •*-> « . 4> 2 *■£3 UD ■*->a a a u o> ■o d 5 ^ 1 3 (j a Z -<1^ o> uCO 2 o E -w § 1 O E C/3 a 6 o ■*-> H Z u z oe U 1 Non Residential Bridge 4539 492 5031 240 centres 4539 children for 12 months Course (Primary) (19 Centre To cover 492 children for 6 for continued months children) 2 Non Residential Bridge 2999 477 3476 163 centres 2999 children for 12 months Course (Upper Primary) (19 centre To cover 477 children for 6 for continue months children) 3 Residential Bridge 19729 756 20485 535 centres 20460 children for 12 Course (Primary) (22 for months continued To cover 756 children for 6 children) months 4 Residential Bridge 18231 340 18571 487 centres 17500 children for 12 Course (Upper Primary) (22 for months continued To cover 340 children for 6 children) months 5 Seasonal Hostels for 0 1131 1131 23 centre To cover 1131 children for migrants- Residential 12 months 6 Tribal Students- 0 1200 1200 24 centre To cover 1200 children for Residential Dormitories 12 months Total 45498 4396 49894 1472 centres Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 46 (II) School Infrastructure (Civil works) A. Civil Works Overview of the performance of last year and the bottlenecks, if any. PAB has approved Rs. 32293.364 lakhs for the year 2008-09. The State has shown tentative expenditure of Rs. 32056.395 lakhs up to 31^ March 2009, leaving a balance of Rs. 236.998 lakh as spillover. The tentative percentage expenditure during the year is 99.27% which is a marked improvement over the last year expenditure of 93%. The state had spillover of Rs. 1712.650 lakh in 2008-09 against the spillover of Rs. 236.998 lakh only now. The cumulative tentative completion rate at the end of March, 2009 is 84% which is quite good. The state has fulfilled its commitment of completing spillover up to 2007-08. It will not be wrong to say that with the present physical and financial progress, the state is on move forward. The state has committed to complete the spillover of 2008-09 by July, 2009 far works in progress. 39 components which have not started may take little longer. Table I - Cumulative Progress 2008-09 (as on 31st December 2008) SNo. Activity State Targets Completed In Financial Expenditure Targets progress (in lakh) (in lakh) 1 BRC 12 12 12 0 72.000 72.000 2 CRC 2169 2169 1884 274 4338.000 4146.900 3 New Primary School B:oilding less Primary 4 school 10050 10050 6983 3024 40791.300 36808.365 Dilapidated Building 5 Primary Upper Primary 6 School Building less Upper 7 8112 8112 6451 1626 40339.130 38847.068 Primary school Dilapidated Building 8 Upper Primary 9 ACR Primary 13496 13496 7221 6251 21906.750 16121.750 10 ACR Upper primary 8852 8852 4625 4211 14446.500 10153.500 11 Toilet Primary 2876 2876 2852 24 287.600 287.600 12 Toilet Upper Primary 3273 3273 3258 15 818.250 818.250 13 Girls Toilets Drinking Water 14 facility Primary 2228 2228 2175 53 806.750 806.750 Drinking Water 15 Upper Primary Rain Water 16 Harvesting Boundary Wall 17 Primary Boundary Wall 18 Upper Primary 19 Ramps Child Friendly 20 25 25 25 0 6.250 6.250 designs 21 Electrification Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 47 22 Major Repairs PS 366 366 204 162 450.064 225.032 23 Major Repairs UPS 77 77 53 24 102.425 51.450 Total 51536 51536 35743 15664 124365.019 108344.915 Source: Progress report ending 31®* December 2008. The financial achievement ending 31®* December, 2008 is 87% which is good and above national average of 80%. The physical completion rate is 69% against the national average of 77%. The state needs to improve the completion rate during 2009-10 and still have Rs. 16020.104 lakhs to spend from the Budget of AWPB 2008-09. However, silver lining is that state has 15664 components in progress and only 129 components not started ending 31®* December, 2008. State has also completed Pre Fabricated Structure of 48 schools in Dantewada. The state team informed that pre- fab schools will start functioning during the new session. Table 2 - Physical and Financial Progress (AWP&B) during 2008-09 (as on 31st Dec. 2008) SNo. Activity Targets Completed In Financial Expenditure progress including up to 31*‘ Dec spillover 2008 (in lakh) (in lakh) 1 BRC 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 2 CRC 147 8 128 337.723 242.511 3 New Primary School 4 Building less Primary school 1315 82 1190 6644.162 5184.778 5 Dilapidated Building Primary 6 New UPS - 7 Building less UPS 444 49 360 3537.556 1044.430 Dilapidated Building Upper 8 Primary 9 ACR Primary 5785 434 5327 12076.117 5805.694 10 ACR Upper primary 4293 293 3984 9125.462 4192.053 11 Toilet Primary 4.598 4.598 12 Toilet Upper Primary 0.006 0.006 lO"^ Drinking Water Facility 9.002 9.002 11 Boundary Wall 0.000 0.000 13 Child Friendly Elements 25 25 0 6.250 6.250 14 Major Repairs (Primary) 366 204 162 450.064 225.032 15 Major Repairs (UPS) 77 53 24 102.425 51.450 16 Others Total 12452 1148 11175 32293.364 16765.804 Source; Progress report ending 31®* December 2008. For AWP&B 2008-09, state has incurred Rs. 16765.804 lakh against an allocation of Rs. 32293.364 which is 52%. The completion rate is 9% only. The state has to accelerate the completion rate. However, the state has 11175 components in progress and only 129 fresh components not started so far. Table 3 - Tentative Cumulative Physical & Financial Progress as on 31®* march 2009 SNo. Activity Targets Completed In Financial Expenditure progress (in lakh) (in lakh) 1 BRC 12 12 0 72.000 72.000 2 CRC 2169 2039 119 4338.000 4308.462 3 Primary School 10050 9265 781 40791.300 40746.036 4 Upper Primary 8112 7711 397 40339.130 40235.294 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 48 Dilapidated Building (Pry) 0.000 0.000 Dilapidated Bjuilding (UP) 0 0.000 0.000 Additional Class Room 22348 15477 6851 36353.250 36294.890 Toilet/Urinals 6149 6126 23 1105.850 1105.850 Separate Girls Toilet 0.000 0.000 10 Drinking Water Facility 2228 2204 24 806.750 806.750 11 Boundary Wall 0.000 0.000 13 Child Friendly Elements 25 25 6.250 6.250 14 Major Repairs (Primary) 366 366 450.064 450.064 15 Major Repairs (UPS) 77 77 102.425 102.425 Total 51536 43302 8195 124365.019 124128.021 Source: State team report The cumulative tentative physical and financial progress as on 31^* March 2009 has been compared with the actual progress achieved as on 31^^ December 2008, which are as under: Table 3(A) - Comparison Financial In Not Period Targets Completed Achievement in progress Started lakh 31.12.08 51536 35743 15664 129 108344.915 31.03.09 51536 43302 8195 39 124128.021 The above figwtes to be commensxirate w i^ the achievement of 31.12.08 and the tentative figures are achievable. The tentative financial achievement as on 31^ March, 2009 is 99% and completion rate is 84%, whereas completion rate at the end of 31^* December, 2008 was 69%. Although, tentative progress appears to be little ambitious but with large numbers of components in progress, the completion rate is achievable. Table 4 - Tentative AWP&B 2008-09 Physical & Financial Progress as on 31®* march 2009 SNo. Activity Targets Completed In Financial Expenditure up to Progress including 31March 2009 spillover (in lakh) (in lakh) 1 BRC 2 CRC 147 42 94 337.723 308.185 3 Primary School 1315 552 759 6644.170 6598.906 4 Upper Primary 444 249 191 3537.556 3433.720 5 Dilapidated Building (Pry) 6 Dilapidated Building - (UP) 7 Additional Class Room 10078 5727 4331 21201.580 21143.220 8 Toilet/Urinals 4.598 4.598 9 Separate Girls Toilet 0.006 0.006 10 Drinking Water Facility 9.002 9.020 11 Boundary Wall 12 Electrification 13 Child Friendly 25 Elements 25 6.250 6.250 14 Major Repairs 366 366 450.060 450.060 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 49 (Primary) 15 Major Repairs (UPS) 77 77 102.430 102.430 16 Others Total 12452 7038 5375 32293.375 32056.395 Source: State Plan AWP&B 2008-09 The tentative financial achievement on March, 2009 is 99%, whereas physical achievement on the same date will be 56%. As already mentioned the completion rate of fresh work is satisfactory, however the state can still improve in case the meticulous planning is done right from the beginning of the financial year. The comparison of progress as on 31^* December 2008 and as on 31^‘ March 2009 for works approved in AWP&B 2008-09 are as under. The physical and financial achievements commensurate with each other. Not Financial Achievement Period Targets Completed In progress Started in lacs 31.12.08 12452 1148 11175 129 16765.804 31.03.09 12452 7038 5375 39 32056.395 The State informed that, substantial expenditure has already been incurred and balance will be incurred by March end because adequate funds are available with the State. Table 5 - Details of Physical and financial spill over for 2008-09 (as on 1/04/09) - Physical Financial SNo. Activity Work not Work in Progress Total (In lakh) Started 1 BRC 0 0 0 0.000 2 CRC 119 11 130 29.538 3 Primary School 781 4 785 45.264 4 Upper Primary 397 4 401 103.836 5 Dilapidated Building (Pry) 0 0 0 0.000 6 Dilapidated Building (UP) 0 0 0 0.000 7 Additional Class Room 6851 20 6871 58.360 8 Toilet/Urinals 23 0 23 0.000 9 Separate Girls Toilet 0 0 0 0.000 10 Drinking Water Facility 24 0 24 0.000 11 Boundary Wall 0 0 0 0.000 12 Electrification 0 0 0 0.000 13 Child Friendly Elements 0 0 0 0.000 14 Major Repairs (Primary) 0 0 0 0.000 15 Major Repairs (UPS) 0 0 0 0.000 16 Others 0 0 0 0.000 Total 8195 39 8234 236.998 Source; State Report As already mentioned, the financial spillover from 2008-09 is only Rs. 236.998 lakh with 39 components yet to start. The state team informed that for all 8195 components, the 2"^* and final installment already stand delivered and they are hopeful to complete the components by June/July, 2009. The total allocation for works in progress and not started, has been workout to Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 50 approximately Rs. 150 cores. The state has committed to complete all components in progress by July, 2009 and components not started so far, little later. Table 6 - Assessments of Gap & Pro >osals and Appraisal team Recommendations Total requirement Status as Proposed Gap Appraisal team Remarks on 1-4- in 2009- recommendation 2009 10 Up gradation of EGS to PS Saturation of special focus 1 1 0 1 categories SC/ST habitations as worked out by the States (PS) New Upper Primary School 39^ 398 0 190 Building for New Primary School 365 365 0 0 started under SSA (Buildingless) ACR 22114 16162 5952 5491 Toilet 24844 59 24785 To be done from convergence Girls Toilet 37028 2691 34337 29 Drinking Water 8187 0 8187 To be done from convergence Major Repairs 1179 448 731 Not proposed by States Boundary Wall Primary Boundary Wall Upper Primary Electrification Child fi-iendly element Bala Elements - Ashram Shala School (Residential) 61 61 0 61 Furniture (Students) 1060873 27488 1033385 14107 Source: State Report The state has asked unit rates as approved in AWP&B 2008-09. However, the unit rate for Ashram Shala School (Residential) as approved by Tribal Welfare Department of Government of Ghhattisgarh are as under: > For 50 children = Rs. 53.57 lakh. > For 100 children = Rs. 87.66 lakh. The guideline for KGBV Hostel has following unit rate approved my MHRD and appraisal team recommends unit cost accordingly: > For 50 children = Rs. 27.10 lakh. > For 100 children = Rs. 36.05 lakh. The state team informed that state government under Tribal Welfare Department, had planned 1095 Ashram Shala School (Residential) out of which 918 have been completed and 116 are in progress, but the state is not taking up balance 61 Ashram Shala School (Residential) and the state has requested now funds from SSA. FAB has already approved 48 residential schools in Dantewada district in 2006-07 with hostel facilities for 500 children each. All the 61 Ashram Shala School (Residential)are to be constructed in Naxalite infested districts, the appraisal team recommend the provision of Ashram Shala Hostel in the AWP&B @ approved by MHRI> for KGBV norms. District Appraisal Report Ghhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 51 wise distribution of New School, New UPS, ACR and Ashram Shala School (Residential) is given under Table 7 Prioritization of selection of location for various infrastructures > The state has provided district wise list of infrastructure facilities in the district plan. > The state may not be able to complete infrastructure gap during 2009-10 and may take more than 3years to complete the same. > The state has completed 16208 classrooms during 2007-08 and likely to complete 20393 classrooms during 2008-09. The state has built capacity and can execute the target recommended by appraisal team for AWP&B 2009-10. > State has Third Party Evaluation System for quality control in place for 2008-09. Table 7 - District wise proposal/recommendation of the major component is appended below Proposal for 2009-10 Ashra Building less PS SNo. District New New m for the PS started ACR Furniture PS UPS Shala under SSA Hostel 1 Bastar 0 0 142 200 - 0 0 2 Bijapur 0 0 0 100 12 0 3 Bilaspur 0 0 0 507 0 -0 4 Dantewada 0 0 0 275 39 0 5 Dhamtari 0 0 0 - 150 0 0 6 Durg 0 0 0 600 0 0 Janjgir- 0 0 7 champa 0 350 0 0 8 Jashpur 0 0 0 150 0 0 9 Kanker 0 0 33 150 1 0 10 Kawardha 0 0 5 150 0 0 11 Korba 0 0 0 200 0 0 12 Korea 0 0 0 189 0 14107 13 Mahasamund 0 1 5 200 0 0 14 Narayanpur 0 0 5 45 7 0 15 Raigarh 0 0 0 700 0 0 16 Raipur 0 0 0 600 0 0 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 0 325 0 0 18 Surguja 0 0 0 600 2 0 Total 0 1 190 5491 61 14107 Source: State Team The state has given district wise proposals for the year 2009-10 based on requirement and DISE data 2007-08. The gap in primary school has not been worked out on realistic basis and has not been accordingly recommended for 2009-10. The PS and UPS sanctioned and building for PS and UPS sanctioned since 2001-02 are appended below: Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 52 Table8-PS&UPSSA^ CTIONED YEARWISE IT) VO 00 Cs o1 o1 o1 O1 o1 o1 o1 o1 Tf V) VO 00 Total Schools o o o o o o o o o- o o o o o Sanctioned n o o PS 0 99 4962 1327 1066 1414 399 9 9276 UPS 0 771 703 778 1830 2568 446 25 7121 Table 9 - PS 4& UPS BUILDINGS SANCTIONED YEARWISE Vi VO 00 os o o o o o o o o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total en 1/^ VO 00 Schools o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Sanctioned rq f Analyzed DISE data of 2007-08 (30^^ September 2007) and the ACR analysis of DISE 2006-07 by TSG for comparison are as under: Table 10 - Comparison of DISE Data Gap in Classrooms as per Gap in Classrooms as per SNo. Districts DISE 2007-08/ actual Survey DISE 2006-07 by TSG by State 1 Bastar 2716 3378 2 Bilaspur 1325 3166 3 Dantewada 1988 2210 4 Dhamtari 481 1429 5 Durg 1341 3796 6 Janjgir-champa 2372 2660 7 Jashpur 1079 1168 8 Kabirdham 497 927 9 Kanker 920 1070 10 Korba 915 1172 11 Korea 189 809 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 53 12 Mahasamund 734 1373 13 Raigarh 1268 1993 14 Raipur 3373 6145 15 Rajnandgaon 925 1775 16 Surguja 1991 3366 Total 22114 36437 For all intent and purposes, DISE data analyzed by state for 2007-08 has been taken for providing gaps in the AWP&B, 2009-10. ______Table 11 - Proposal of Major Repair for 2009-10______. Upper Primary Primary Level Total SNo. Districts Level Phy Fin. p h r Fin. Phy Fin. Bastar 63 74.320 4.800 67 79.120 Bilaspur 29 50.003 14 43.000 43 93.003 Dhamtari 86 45.340 24 21.513 110 66.853 Jashpur 43 43.263 16.860 50 60.123 Kanker 64 95.175 0.000 64 95.175 Korea 50 76.420 10 18.460 60 94.880 Raigarh 40 61.157 3.100 41 64.257 RaipvtT 13 27.770 0 0.000 13 27.770 Total 388 473.448 60 107.733 448 581.181 Although state has proposed Major Repair for 2009-10, but the state team has requested the appraisal team to give as many classroom as possible as the state has give preference of construction of classroom over Major Repair. Accordingly appraisal team is not recommending any major repair in AWP&B, 2009-10. C. Furniture: Table 12 - Proposals for Furniture Proposal Name of the Physical District No. of Upper Primary Schools No. of Students Financial Korea 147 27488 137.44 Total 147 27488 137.44 The State is not having sufficient infrastnicture gap requirement in Korea district and hence proposed furniture. The allocation in this district will not increase 24% limit as per MHRD guidelines. Convergence: As per Table 17 of the existing school infrastructure, the state has yet to undertake following schools requiring toilet and drinking water facility. PS and UPS schools without drinking water facilities respectively 4897+ 3292 = 8187 PS and UPS schools without toilet facilities respectively 18734+ 6110 = 24844 PS and UPS without girls’ toilet facilities respectively 27741+ 9287 = 37028 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 54 The above figures show that state has large gaps for DWS and Toilet Facilities and convergence needs to be effective. States is not monitoring the convergence effectively and have no data for completion rate of DWS& TSC, without which it is difficult to pinpoint the PHE department. Appraisal team recommends, the time frame for completion of above facilities may be given by the state to PAB. Management Structure in civil work: Table 13 - Management Structure in civil work Post Sanctioned Filled Vacant State level Executive Engineer 1 1 0 Expert Junior Engineer 2 1 1 Total 3 2 1 District Level Asst. Engineer 32- 19 13 Total 32 19 13 Block level Asst. Engineer of RES 146 146 0 Diploma Engineer of RES 578 578 0 Total 724 724 0 The state is having sufficient technical manpower at state and block level but need to fill up vacancies at district level. Third Party Evaluation: The state has finalized 4 agencies/consultant for Third Party Evaluation as per details give below; Table 14 Group - Zone Agency /Consultant Group No.-l & Zone- Raipur AnandJi Wala Tech. Consultancy District - Dhamtari, Durg, Kawardha, Ahmedabad (G.J.) Mahasamund, Raipur & Rajnandgaon Group No.-2 & Zone- Bilaspur AnandJi Wala Tech. Consultancy District - Bilaspur, Janjgir-champa, Korba & Ahmedabad (G.J.) Raigarh. Group No.-3 & Zone- Sarguja Mahamaya Consultants Ambikapur District - Jashpur, Korea & Sarguja (C.G.) Group No.-4 & Zone- Bastar G.S. Engineering Consultancy Raipur District - Bastar, Bijapur, Dantewada, Kanker (C.G.) & Narayanpur Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 55 The role of the Third Party Evaluation agency is to provide an independent assessment on the quality of Civil Works under execution at different stages of construction. The state has been advised to share with the finding of Third Party Evaluation agencies with district and block level engineers from time to time. In fact all the merits and demerits in respect of Civil Works are shared fortnightly/monthly with all engineers so that they can benefit from each other in maintaining quality in Civil Works. The State has not given qualitative & quantitative achievement of evaluation done during 2008-09. School Mapping: The status of school mapping of the state is as under: Table 15 Number of Completed In Achievement Covered District Districts District Progress % age 18 14 14 77.78% The state has already completed 14 districts out of 18 districts and the school mapping is in progress in balance of 4 districts. The state is likely to complete the school mapping in another 3 months. Asset Register: Asset register are being prepared by the village education committee at the school level. Regular checking and monitoring of the register is being done by District and Block level officials. Engineers in the field have been advised to verify the register while visiting the site. Training of Engineers: The State team has informed that 5 days training have already been imparted to the engineers and proposal have been prepared for 2009-10. Issues: - State has large gaps for toilets and drinking water (70059). The State is'not effectively monitoring the work of convergence with PHE. The State should ensure completion of gaps of DWS and TSC after proper co-ordination with the state convergence team and also monitor the completion of these gaps monthly/quarterly. (Ill) Quality Related Issues 1. Information about Learning Achievement (LA) Surveys: The State Plans have indicated that at present findings of five major learning assessment surveys are available for reference. They include the following. 1. Feedback from Quality Monitoring Tools (shows consistent improvement in students’ performance over quarterly feedback) 2. Findings of DISE 3. Students’ learning achievement survey undertaken by SCERT on sample basis 4. ASER’s findings 5. Findings from NCERT’s national learning achievement surveys for classes III, V and VII/VIII 6. External learning assessment survey in collaboration with El, Ahmedabad Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 56 Findings of these surveys are discussed below. 1. Feedback from QMT (NCERT): Analysis of Class-wise/ subject-wise Achievement Data State has put the academic monitoring format pertaining to class-wise achievement into online system with the help of NIC to reduce teachers & coordinators task to do all calculations manually. State has presented the following observations based on the students’ achievements: Major findings: 1. In Class 1, 2, 3 and 4, boys and girls are seen to show similar trends. However, performance in English is lowest. More number of students have been successful in crossing the 80% mark in Maths in Class 1,2 and 5, than in other subjects. 2. The proportion of SC children scoring grade A in English is more in Class 1,4,6 and 8 as compared to other subjects. 3. In the preliminary classes, CWSN have shown presence in Grade A with regard to English, but after Class 2, this pattern vanishes. CWSN have not shown a pattern. 4. Girls are seen to lag behind boys in all subjects till Class 3, except in Maths in Class 3. The trend for boys and girls in Class 4 and 5 looks identical, though boys have managed to be more in the above 80% group for Maths in Class 6. In Class 8, both boys and girls show more high scorers in English than in any other subject. 5. As far as the SC and ST groups are concerned, it is observed that they are keepin^g up a trend till Class 5, after which an abrupt decrease is seen. Activities undertaken for addressing the issues: 1. English teaching has been strengthened using Radio programmes. In next session, more systematic efforts to ensure regular use in classrooms. English program at Upper Primary level to continue the effort from class 1. 2. Mainstreaming of CWSN through RBCs & improve the quality of teaching -learning of CWSN in proper way using TLM 3. Subject-wise need based training of teachers. Action plan for 2009-10: 1. Strengthening upper-primary schooling delivery mechanism. 2. Language teaching, particularly Hindi needs special attention. 3. Teaching of Social Science requires systematic effort. Following are the tables pertaining to class-wise/ subject-wise/ gender-wise/ category-wise results: Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 57 ______Figure-1______Class IrPercentage of Boys (b) & Girls (g) with Grade A & B in three Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■ HINDI ® MATHS 8.30 8.40 7.90 8.00 6.71 A(b) A(g) B(b) B(g) Figure-2 Class IrPercentage of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in three Subjects I ENGLISH ■ HINDI B MATHS 5.20 5.00 2.50 2.60 I I I i l l illB{sc) illB(st} A{sc) A(sl) Figure-3 Class liPercentageof CWSN students with Grade A & B in three subjects 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.01 A(sn) 8{sn) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 58 ______Figure-4 ______Class 2:Percentage of Boys (b) & Girls (g) with Grade A <& B in three Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■ HINDI H MATHS 9.40 9-60 9.90 9.40 7.80 5 80 10 5.20 5.10 4.90 4.40 A(b) A{g) B(b) B{g) Figure-5 Class 2:Percentage of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in three Subjects 1 ENGLISH »HINCM B MATHS 5.80 5.90 3.30 2.90 2.90 2.80 2.90 1.20 A(sc) A(st) B(sc) IB(sl) Figure-6 C!l4iss 2: I*erceiitsige o f 0"WSN stiKieints witli Oracle A & B in tliree Sui>Jec:t.s ENGLISH WHJNDI i« MATHS 0.20 0 . 1 3 0 . 0 9 0.10 0 . 0 7 0 . 0 3 A ( s n > B ( s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 59 ______Figure-7______Class 3:Percentage of Boys (b) & Girls (g) with Grade A & B in four Subjects ■ ENGLISH « HINDI » M ATHS ■ EVS 8.608.70^-^0 8.50 8.30 8-80 6.70 HI HI 6.80 ilU4.40‘>■9° i f A(b) A(g) B(b) B(g) ______Figures______Class 3:Percentage of SC & vST students with Grade A & B in four Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■ HINDI a MATHS BEVS 3.30 , 2.60 , 2.60 130 2-30 2.14 2-30 1 20 1.301.301-50 . u u A{sc) A(st) B(sc) B{st) Figure-9 Class 3:Percentage o f C^WSIST students with O racle A & B in four Subjects ■I ENGLISH ■ HINDI m MATHS ■ EVS 0.40 0 3 0 H H 0.10 A(sn) 1 - H B{sn) H..H Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 60 ______Figure-10______Class 4:Percentage of Boys (b) & Girls (g) with Grade A & B in four Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■HINDI SMATHS BEVS 9.409.17 9-70 9.178.90 9.90 4.80 S.IOS.IO 5-50 A(b) A{g) B{b) B(g) Figure-11 Class 4:Percentage of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in four Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■HINDI SMATHS ■ EVS 6.20 5.705.60 2.90 310 2.702.702.60 iiiii iiill illl A(sc) A{st) B(sc^ B{st) Figure. 12 Ols^ss *4: jPercentage o f C\?\^SIsr stud en ts w itli O r a c l e jV & B in Tour Subjects ■ ENGLISH « HINDI » MATHS ■ EVS 0.20 0 .2 0 0 -20 0.10 0.10 0.01 0 .0 2 A ( s n } B ( s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 61 ______Figure-13______ Clfiss 5:Percentage of Boys (b) S c Oirls (g) with Oracle A & B in four Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■ HINDI S M A TH S ■ EVS 14.70 UUA(b} liuA(g) B{b) B{g) Figure-14 Class 5:Percentage of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in four Subjects [ENGLISH ■HINDI ^ MATHS ■ EVS 7 50 7.80 7.90 , 6 . 5 0 3.30 3.703_^ 3.403,10^:°* 1.80 j 3^1.901.80 iiiLnil A(sc) A(sl) B(sc) B(st) Figure. 15 Olsiss S:P*ei'cent£ig:e o f CXV SN stuclenti.s w ith <& B in foiii- Subjects ■ EIMC3L1SH *1 HINDI ® N/1ATHS ■ EVS 0 . 5 0 0 . - 4 0 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 H 0.02 0 . 0 4 A ( s n ) I B (s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 62 ______Figure. 16______Chiss 6:Percentage of Boys(b) & Girls(g)with Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH » HINDI ® MATHS ■SCIENCE «S.SCIENCE « SANSKRIT 5.90 5.28 5.70 5.60 •5.30 4.80 3 .9 0 2.90 2.90 2 .6 0 2.20 , 2.30 -in 1 70 A(b> A (g ) B{b) B(g) Figure. 17 Class 6:Percentiige of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH « HINDI « MATHS ■SCIENCE BS-SaENCE ■SANSKRIT 2.80 1.90 1.60 cf\ A(sc) A{st) B(sc) B(st) FigureJ8 01«ss of* CW^SISf stucli&nt:s (sni> w ith Oi-£»cle A ENGLISH ■ HINDI W IVIATHS «l SCIENCE ■ S.SCIENCE ®l SANSKRIT 0 . 3 0 0 - 3 0 0 - 3 0 O .X O 0 . 1 0 0.10 0.10 o .o s 0 - 0 6 u I h I 0 . 0 3 o.o-a A ( s n ) B ( s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 63 ______Figure. 19______Class 7:Percentjige of Boys (b) & Girls (g) with Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■ HINDI a MATHS ■SCIENCE BS.SCIENCE i! SANSKRIT 11.10 9.30 6.90 3 00 3.90 0 9 2.90MI —2.90 2.90 2.7q_2.302.4Qj^^B 1.90 i .8 0 M !_ 1.9 A{b) A{g) B(b) B(g) Figure.20 Class 7:Percentageof SC & ST students-^ith Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■HINDI ■ MATHS ■SCIENCE ■S.SCIENCE H SANSKRIT 3.50 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 _210 1.60 1.50 0^.30 A(sc) A{st) B(sc) B(st) Figure.21 dassi of* C*W'SJNT cl«? li in six S«l>Jecrt;s ENGLISH ■■ MirslDI «■ IVIATHS «i SCIENCE MB S.SCIENCE ■» SANSKRIT 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.10 O.XO 0.10 jmn 0 . 0 3 . 1111111111 iiiiiiiiiii^ 1111111 A ( s n ) B ( s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 64 ______Figure-22______' ______Oliiss SrPercentiige of Hoys (b) & Oirls (g) with Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■HINDI ffl MATHS ■SCIENCE ■ S.SCIENCE ■ SANSKRIT 11.10 9 . 3 0 9 .6 0 A(b) A (g ) B{b> B(e) Figure-23 Class 8:Percentage of SC & ST students with Grade A & B in six Subjects ■ ENGLISH ■HINDI B MATHS ■ SCIENCE ■ S.SCIENCE « SANSKRIT 3.50 3.00 2.90 3-O^g^ 0.90 0.60 0 70 0.900.8 W J m A(sc) A(st) B(sc) B(st) Figure.24 C!liiss 8:I^ercentage o f C!"WSIST students w ith Orside A ^ 6 in six Subjects ENGLISH ■HINDI W JVIATHS ■SCIENCE ■S.SCIENCE ■SANSKRIT 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 A ( s n ) B ( s n ) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 65 b. Reflections from DISE: Learning achievement as per DISE DISE refer. Class IV Class VII Year Passed Passed with Passed Passed with >60% >60% DISE 2003- 04 87.9% 38.9% 73.5% 14.7% DISE 2004- 05 89.4% 38.9% 73.9% 15.8% DISE 2005- 06 „ 45.76% —— DISE 2006-07 90.23% 45.97% 71.86% 22.52% DISE 2007-08 92.34% 46.22% 73.35% 23.63% c. Reflections from SCERT study: State SCERT has done a students’ achievement study for classes 3 to 8th. As per the study, the results and district-wise ranking on different subjects are: District-wise Achievement at Primary Level Name of Total SNo. Hindi English M aths EVS Average Rank District Student I Bastar 353 70.5 69.7 67.1 69.8 69.3 8 2 Bilaspur 450 56.4 47.1 51.9 53.2 52.1 13 3 Dhamtari 428 83.5 - 72.2 70.1 85.2 77.8 4 4 Durg 450 76.6 68.1 73.7 74.2 73.1 6 Janjgeer- 5 429 65.8 55.3 55.2 63.4 59.9 12 Champa 6 Jashpur 293 72.5 70.4. 64.6 65.5 68.3 9 7 Kabirdham 435 79.2 76.0 81.0 77.9 . 78.5 2 8 Kanker 375 55.0 48.^) 47.2 52.2 50.6 14 9 Korba 450 79.6 81.1 77.0 75.1 78.2 3 10 Mahasamund 450 77.6 69.4 75.9 77.3 75.0 5 11 Raigarh 393 70.7 66.9 72.9 75.5 71.5 7 12 Raipur 264 79.9 73.3 80.8 83.5 79.4 1 13 Rajnandgaon 435 59.1 64.0 68.2 68.3 64.9 11 14 Sarguja 427 69.8 64.3 65.6 69.6 67.3 10 State Average 5632 71.1 65.9 67.9 70.7 68.9 Source: AWP & I SSA, C ihattisgarh 2009-1 The achievement of students in all the subjects namely Hindi, English, Maths and Environment was analyzed Gender-wise and Area-wise. The mean achievement in Hindi was 71%, in English 65.9%, in Maths 67.9% and Environment was 70.7%. So, the achievement level was highest in Hindi followed by EVS, Maths and English. The mean achievement of students in all the subjects in all the subjects combined was 68.9%. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 66 District wise achievement at Upper primary level: Total Social SNo. Name of District Hindi English Maths Science Average Rank Student Science Bastar 3 0 T ■TO?" 1 0 3 " 28.46 ■TOT TT Bilaspur 3(nJ5“ TTTir ~ W W -W 9T IT Uhamtari ■ w ~2SJW ■TOT ■TOT ~W 7T "41 91 TT "Durg ■ w ~5SXr s r w ■OTT "55:5r ■TO5" ~5-~ Janjgeer-Champa 'W T4T2' 49.03 ■453S" “4K 23 44.41 TT Jashpur W 30:Z5" 39.68 TTZT ■^9:79“ 33 3 3 " " 4 0 9 “ 3 " T ~ Kabirdham 450 72.09 65:36 74.44 80.00 793T 74:23~ T" Kanker ■^53T ■42TT 3 2 3 T ■4X99" T T T ~ Korba ■ w “55T5- 3 3 T T ■TOT ■TO3T ~B m r “nr Mahasamund ~5UW TTSr 3TS4" 53.55 ~5Tjr 49.85 TT Kaigarh -IJT ~u2rw 32^ " 3533T ■TO8“ ■TOJT TT Raipur 3 W 3 0 2 “ ■TO9" “52:^ “5 0 9 " 64.62 343T TT Rajnandgaoni “w r 56.04 3D7Sr “5731T "577rr "5 2 D T TT Sarguja 3 3 r 3a3T ~5m ir ~ 5 m r TTTT ~5U3T State Average ■352T 35:8r TOT 357rr "587^ - Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 The achievement of slAidents m Hindi, Engiish, Maths, Science and Social Science was analyzed Gender-wise and Area-wise. Tlie mean achievement in Hindi was 55.86%, in English 44.20%, in Maths 54.56%, in Science 55.70% and in Social Science 58.72%. The mean achievement of students in all the subjects in all the subjects combined was 53.18%. d. Feedback from ASER study: ASER report has shown remarkable progress in the area of basic competencies in the state. Compared to 2006, there is more than 20 percentage point increase in the proportion of children in Std. 3 to 5 who can read Std. 1 level text or more and can do subtraction or division. Bigger gains are visible for children in Std. 1-2. In 2008, less than 10% children in Std. Significant gains in learning levels 1 could not read letters or recognize numbers 1 to 9. This was close to 31% 100.0 in 2007. At the 2008 level, I % CNIdren (Std Chhattisgarh is only behind Kerala, 1-2) w ho CAN MP, Manipur and Nagaland. In 2007, READ 10.5% children in Std. 3 could read a £ letters, words or 2 more Std. 2 level text. This jumped to Z 22.7% in 2008. Corresponding o I % CNIdren (Std increase for children in Std. 4 was 1-2) w ho CAN from 31.6% to 56.1%. Similarly RECOGNIZE compared to 2.2% children in 2007, NUMBERS (1-9) 15% children in Std. 3 could solve a or nnore 0.0 division problem in 2008. For the ASER 2006 ASER 2008 same task there is a 25% point improvement for children in Std. 4-6. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 67 e. Findings from NCERT’s surveys: The NCERT has conducted the Round 1 Assessment Survey, Round II Assessment survey and proposes to conduct Round III survey in 2010 to study the status of improvement at three levels during the course of implementation of SSA. The impact of various quality interventions of SSA as revealed through Round I and Round II) are outlined below. Round I for V was done in 2001 - 02 and Round II was done in 2005-06. For class III Round I was done in 2003-04 and Round II was done in 2007-08) Social Language Maths EVS/ Science Class Science RI RII RIRII R I R II R I R II Class III (State Average) 50.69 56.57 41.96 48.98 National Average 63.12 67.84 58.25 61.89 Class V (State Average) 49.69 50.30 38.36 38.18 43.15 46.44 National Average 58.87 60.31 46.51 48.46 50.30 52.19 Class VIII (State Average) 43.13 50.46 28.52 35.93 34.91 39.21 39.51 45.56 National Average 53.86 56.49 39.17 42.57 41.30 42.71 46.19 47.89 Source: NCERTs Round 1 and Round 11 Learning Achievement surveys The above table indicates that there is a minor improvement in the perform^ce of Chhattisgarh students in Round II over Round I. However in comparison to the national weighted mean the State performance is much less and calls for special interventions. Observation: The Plans have indicated that they rely on the ongoing learning assessment processes from schools to understand the learning levels of students across the State. Based on the results of the class tests the State has managed to on line learning achievement of all students across the State. Such loading and compilation has helped the managers to find out common patterns related to children’s learning, such as district authorities know in which subjects children have managed to score more than 60% marks, or, less than 40% marks. Also the errors related to manual data compilation at different levels have gone down. The Appraisal Team feeis that this is good from the managerial point of view to see a comparative picture of students’ performance in one platform. At the same time it seems to be highly limited academic exercise as the tests are not uniform and they are undertaken by teachers of concerned schools. In the absence of a common testing mechanism, it is impossible to compare the learning achievement of students and also to identify the learning difficulties of students accurately. a. Nature and frequency of Learning Achievement Surveys in the State The State has conducted the following achievement study at elementary level: 1. For classes 1 & 2, districts have done achievement tests in selected 50 schools 2. ASER report for basic literacy skills Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 68 3. For classes 3 to 8*^, state has conducted a large scale testing with 500 students in each class in each block in all the blocks of the state. This has been done with UNICEF support. The data entry is going on and the result is awaited. 4. Chhattisgarh SCERT has conducted students’ achievement survey for classes 3 to 8th. Detailed analysis of resuhs is made available in the State Component Plan. Observation: This indicates that the State has detailed learning achievement results from each school through the ongoing regular school tests in every quarter. This is based on the concerned teachers’ feedback on their students’ learning. This is very useful for the concerned teacher to track the leaming achievement of her students on a regular basis. At the same time it is seen that these results are not very reflective of students’ leaming difficuhies and factors contributing to them .hence the concerned teacher may not be able to do a critical analysis of students’ leaming levels and design appropriate measures to strengthen the leaming processes appropriately for students. These findings are reflected in DISE. Hence the same equation applies to DISE results too. Also these findings are not comparable as the tests are different from each other. This does not help the CRCs, BRCs, DIETs, etc. to identify the common leaming difficulties and possible strategies to address them in an organized manner. ASER study is useful in connection with students’ leaming levels in basic hteracy and numeracy. However this may not be sufficient for the teachers to strengthen pedagogical processes in each subject. The other source is leaming achievement results of the SCERT’s sample survey on leaming achievement. This is as useful survey and provides a comparable picture. At the same time it does not provide a critical anaysis of the data to indicate leaming difficulties in different subjects and classes. Hence the teacher educators and teachers will not be able to identify concemed factors contributing to leaming difficulties and design stragies to address them. NCERT’s survey is more reflective as it provides a critical analysis of the findings and also highlights the leaming difficujties, factors contributing to them. However the sample size is small and the survey were undertaken years back. Hence the target groups have changed and the concemed teachers would not be able to address the leaming gaps and related issues for the present generation of leamers. The Educational Initiative’s study seems to be large scale and is expected to provide granular feedback regarding students’ leaming. However it is not available now and may take some time. On the whole the State does not have a comprehensive picture regarding students’ leaming levels, their leaming difficulties, factors contributing to children’s leaming difficulties and possible inputs to address the leaming related issues in an integrated manner and a focused manner. This is a limitation in the planning process and is bound to affect the overall performance in the area of quality improvement. The State must plan for these in a systematic manner. The Appraisal Team would like to insist on the need for strengthening leaming assessment system in the State and also for critical analysis of the leaming achievement results for identifying leaming issues and designing appropriate strategies for addressing them in an integrated manner.______Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 69 a. Findings from other learning achievement surveys in the State (subject wise, class wise, district wise learning achievement): As per the State’s Plans, the State has conducted Mass Students’ Achievement Survey in collaboration with Educational Initiative. The results are awaited and once the results are declared, State has the plan to focus on those hard spots and deal them through teachers’ training. State has also planned to do systematic analysis of students answ^er sheets while mass valuation in the centres itself. The evaluation team will discuss the difficulty areas due to which, students’ performance are less and prepare a list of such hard areas and pass it to the Resource Persons and training institutes so that they may take these issues in their training sessions. Teachers are also planned to get themselves trained on error analysis so that they can have the idea of common errors being committed by students in their classrooms. Observation: The Learning Achievement survey undertaken by Educational Initiative, Ahmedabad seems to bear some promise for providing granular information. The State may try to identify learning difficulties, factors contributing to learning difficulties in different subjects and classes and design appropriate strategies (inputs and processes) to address them in a systematic manner. b. Learning difficulties identified in different subjects where children score low and need more academic support (class wise, district wise): State has conducted the mass students’ achievement survey with Educational Initiative. State has also planned to do systematic analysis of students answer sheets while mass valuation in the centres itself. c. Major Factors affecting Learning Achievement (home, school, teacher, TLMs, training, pedagogy, assessment, remedial...): As per the State Plans, factors affecting Learning Achievement of students have been highlighted the following way. Factors How they affect learning achievement / status Home Poverty and requirement of additional hands for house hold chores No support at home for studies/ no proper learning environment First generation learners This issue was raised in front of teachers & various groups. On the basis of various discussions, some of the factors which affect students’ learning achievement are: Lack of importance of education Difference between school and home environment School Regular functioning of schools Decentralized administrative structure in place for accountability Performance appraisal required Attractive classrooms, sufficient infrastructure required Better linkages with community Teacher Huge number of untrained teachers Subject-wise teacher deployment Rationalization of teachers Local teachers in position for earlier grade Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 70 Factors How they affect learning achievement / status Non-teaching tasks by teachers TLM Timely receipt of fbnds to teachers for TLM development Training of teachers for effective TLM Regular use of TLM for better understanding & comprehension Students active participation for TLM development & use Strong monitoring mechanism for regular use of TLM in classrooms Training Need-based teachers training required Training to be given in classroom setting Subject-based training and focus on completing the textbooks with exercises Training should be linked with students’ results Avoid training during mid-sessions Pedagogy As per the level of students Easy to complex Easier to manage/ handle by teachers Avoid mechanical learning Remove fear of examination Maximum teachers time on task Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Observation*. The Appraisal Team appreciates the effort of the State and District level planners in identifying some of the factors contributing to students’ learning achievement. There is no doubt that these are some common issues and factors that we have realized while working with children. We also have been trying hard to address these issues through several measures. However the Appraisal Team would like to clarify that these are not sufficient to use as issues and factors related to students’ learning difficulties. Learning assessment surveys need to cover perceptions and observations of teachers, parents as well. They also should critically analyse learning achievement results of students to find out the factors contributing to students’ learning difficulties. At present the Pedagogy Teams are not conversant with children’s learning difficulties based on their performance in learning achievement tests. They are more impressionist as teachers and trainers have identified learning difficulties based on their impressions. This is not sufficient. Pedagogy Teams at different levels must critically analyse the learning achievement results to identify the learning difficulties more accurately. Along with this they also should find out what factors contribute to their poor performance. Suppose children in class III could not do well in questions related to fractions in the tests. This indicates that either there was shortage of appropriate TLMs related to fraction learning, or, the teacher had not understood the concept properly, or, the teaching methodology (pedagogy) was not appropriate to help each child understand the concept, or, the question in the assessment test was not simple for the children to understand, etc. This way the factors may be either teacher, TLM, pedagogy or, assessment. Once it is known for the school, then the Pedagogy Teams must take it up in a serious manner. To address this issue, they can help Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 71 teachers to design appropriate TLM, focus training on this, change the approach to learning assessment or, pedagogy to clarify the doubts of the children immediately. At present the approach is not like this. Hence, in spite of all quality related interventions for years, learning achievement of students is not improving as per expectation. The State must gear up in this mode to strengthen its pedagogical interventions in an integrated and focused manner. This will take the State to a higher level in terms of students’ learning achievement. Presently, the State does not have the granular information in this regard. It must strive to look at the above points and design strategies. The Study undertaken by Education Initiative, Ahmedabad seems to carry some possibilities in this regard. d. Vision of quality education and effective classroom in different subjects The Plans have highlighted that the State has the following vision in mind while planning for quality education for the year 2009-10: 1. Proper Infrastructure and human resource is required to expect quality education from a school Child-friendly schools through School Improvement Plan, provision of teachers as per requirement, library, classrooms, play facilities etc., improving performance o f teachers 2. Improved processes to ensure better performance, community involvement in school management, regular support and feedback mechanisms well in place for improved performance Best & timely use of School & teacher grants, well functioning resource support systems from SCERT to CRCs, community involvement in quality issues, technology supported monitoring mechanism 3. Learning Enhancement program with clear focus on improving students’ achievement Focus o f science/ Math/ English teaching, result tracking mechanism for each school 4. Attention to capacity building programmes Capacity building with a focus on achieving desired performance standards, inculcating national feeling among teachers, better use o f technology. Overall goals regarding Quality Improvement in the next 3 years: • Teachers will be able to reflect upon their surroundings and do efforts to improve the situation • More authority to School heads to improve school conditions and management of schools • Schools will have sufficient number of resource materials for children • There will be a satisfactory increase in the students learning opportunity time and teachers’ time on task • Blocks and clusters will be able to analyze their performance and set their own targets for quality improvement • Resource centres will be strengthened to provide on-site academic support Nature of desired pedagogic processes and learning environment for each subject area: All efforts will be made to make our classrooms like the following and the same will be shared during different training programmes and providing different reading materials: • Clean, comfortable and attractive classrooms • Regular attendance of students as well as teachers Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 72 • Create a motivated independent learner, equipped to face the challenges of future • Cooperative learning inside and outside the classroom • Maximum time-on-task by both teachers and students • Dress-up the walls with visual aids/ display materials • Infrastructure availability as per requirements • Easy to access learning/ activity materials • Appropriate seating plans as per subject being taught • Stress-free, friendly atmosphere, liberty to ask questions and clarify doubts • Well planned, outcome-based & linked activities in classrooms Observations: This is commendable that the State has attempted to interpret the needs and challenges of the classrooms in a systematic way. The above points clearly indicate that the Pedagogy Teams are striving to strengthen the classroom processes. At the same time the Appraisal Team feels that it might not be sufficient to address the learning needs of each school. These seem to be more general and managerial than pedagogical and learning centered. What is needed is derivation of a vision in terms of pedagogical processes based on learning needs of students in each classroom addressing the learning difficulties of each student appropriately. It has been realized over the years that the ongoing teacher training, academic support, grants, etc. have not been able to bring in the desired shift in the classroom processes in different subject areas. The question is How can we expect some significant outcome in the process? In this regard our vision regarding the desired shifts in classroom processes in different subjects need to be clear and outcome based. Following points may be considered while planning for subject specific classroom processes. i. Language classes should have more print rich environment with availability of wide of age appropriate graded reading materials both for teachers and children. Language pedagogy should promote more of reading, writing and should be highly interactive in nature to enable children sharpen their language learning skills. In this regard SSA, Chhattisgarh is well prepared as they have developed more than 200 reading cards for primary classes for enhancing the basic literacy skills of children. Other than this, the State also has promoted a large scale reading enhancement Programme, and establishment of school libraries in all the tribal hostels. Such materials can be rigorously used for facilitating more of interaction in classrooms. ii. Mathematics classes should promote more of mathematization in thinking process of both teachers and children. Activities should be related to estimation, measurement, calculation, derivation, justification, mental mathematics, etc. Such activities related to algebra, geometry, mensuration, trigonometry, etc. can sharpen the mathematical abilities of children. SSA, Chhattisgarh has started using several mathematical teaching learning materials in schools. They need to promote more of hands on explorations and mental mathematics. iii. Science classes need to promote more of exploratory activities related to local nature and locally available materials. Both teacher and students should engage in more of out of class explorations to study the world of plants, animals, physical elements and chemical elements. SSA, Chhattisgarh is promoting lot of science activities in collaboration with several NGOs — — 1 - ..- ...... Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 73 and other academic resource centers. They would strengthen, the exploratory pedagogical processes in schools. iv. In Social Science there should be lot of scientific explorations of society (land, people, culture, market, past and society management, etc.) to make the learning of history, geography, political science and economics more exciting and useful for children. At present the school pedagogy culture is not sufficiently tuned to such pedagogical beliefs. Hence children do not find appropriate learning environments and platforms to learn the subjects well. The State needs to look at these learning principles critically and design own strategies for bringing in desired changes in the pedagogical processes in schools. This has been well narrated in NCF 2005 and the State needs to prepare for this. This is high time for bringing in the changes. Once this is understood, automatically all the related inputs and processes in a State can be suitably organized. They will need ample changes in the role of community members, teachers, TLMs, pedagogy, assessment, educational technology and overall quality management. 2. Designing of all inputs and related processes: a. Role of Community: Community contribution to learning in 2008-09: As per the Plans, every school does have the school management committee consisting of 10-15 members including parents, persons interested in the* education of their community, ladies, representation from deprived, marginalized & disabled etc. last year. State Govt, made certain amendments in the constitution of School level education committee. As per these amendments, schools will have class-wise attendance monitoring and quality assurance committee. Last year, from the budget available in Learning Enhancement Program, two parent-teacher meetings were organized in schools. During these meetings, sharing of students performance, reporting of school activities, results as per the exercise done in Bachpan-Balmitra workbooks, school requirements, support from conmiunity expected etc. were discussed. Community has been involved in quality improvement, enrolment and retention drive and attendance monitoring. Inputs and processes related to community mobilization for 2009-10: This year, community training grant has been used in the following way: 1. Orientation during enrolment drive, Shishu vachan program 2. Implementation of “Gunvatta and Nirantarta kaaryakram” 3. Orientation of persons involved in the construction of school building, additional classrooms and other civil works related activities. Observation: It is commendable that the State is trying hard to involve the community members in school development activities. At the same time the Appraisal Team feels that in course of time community members should be involved in tracking and improving school performance. It will be possible if the school will be able to articulate its learning goals and pedagogical agenda before the community in simple terms. This can take the schools and community to a special level of collaboration. The State Pedagogy Coordinator has highlighted that each class has got a “Learning assessment and quality improvement Committee” consisting oT three parent members to look after learning related issues in the class. They regularly sit together in the school to Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 74 discuss various academic issues of the class and address them. This is a good culture and should be strengthened. The following format is used for the purpose. SNo. Name of Target for quality Actions planned for improvement student improvement By teacher By parents By both Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 20( 9-10 This is a good beginning and is expected to strengthen the school level interventions for quality improvement. b. Role of Teacher: It is good to note that the State has planned for Error Analysis exercises by teachers in children’s note books, examination papers and daily performance in 209 - 10. This is a good idea and is expected to contribute to critical analysis of learning processes of students. Also the State has designed a website named Humr Khoj to identify resourceful teachers in different parts of the State and flash their innovative activities for other teachers and teacher educators to benefit from. Other than this, the State attempts to address the learning difficulties of students in teacher training programmes regularly Also the State has designed performance indicators for trainers and teachers to ensure that teachers are aware of their role and functions related to physical, cognitive, social and institutional needs of the school and they perform accordingly to succeed as teachers. The Appraisal Team appreciates the efforts of the State in this regard. Information on Teachers (as on March end 2008) Sanctioned Post Working Vacancies By Under Total By Under Total By Under Total State SSA State SSA State SSA PS 79150 28665 107815 54454 27691 82145 24696 974 25670 UPS 37407 26249 63656 27118 22769 49887 10289 3480 13769 116557 54914 171471 81572 50460 132032 34985 4454 39439 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 This does not reflect a satisfactory progress. Still 39439^ teachers including 34985 teachers from State quota and 4454 teachers under SSA are to be recruited. This is a big number. The State should try to clear the backlog at the earliest. PAB may like to set a deadline for the same. Status on teacher vacancies and the State policy on filling these vacancies: As per the Plans, the State has the massive promotion drive this year and most of the Senior Teachers from primary schools are promoted to Upper primary and Upper Primary into High School level. So teachers post at elementary level are vacant. In 2008 - 09, the State witnessed massive recruitment drives of teachers till date through written exam conducted by Professional Examination Board. There were two merit lists made for recruitment of teachers.-First merit list was made for those who were having the professional degree with them of D.Ed./ B.Ed. second merit list was based ort untrained but merit with their Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 75 12^^' or graduation marks. Teachers are placed in schools as per the vacancy and requirements. The process of recruitment was postponed for some time due to election and now as per demand, more teachers from the waiting lists are being recruited and the process is still going on. State policy and steps taken towards teacher rationalization: State Govt, has issued a new set up for schools vide the order no. F. 6-2/2008/20 dated 31.03. 2008. SNo. Name of the post Scale No. of posts 1 Head Master 5000-8000 01 2 Asst. Teacher/ 4000-6000 02 Shikshakarmi Grade 3 3800-5800 3 Sweeper (Temporary) Collector rate 01 Total 04 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 This set up is for classes 1 to 5. One post of teacher is arranged for 40 students. This set up is for maximum 80 students. For more than 80 students, one additional post of teacher is ensured. At primary level, 50% posts will be from arts & 50% will be from science stream. School set up aT Upper Primary level SNo. Name of the post Scale No. of posts 1 Head Master 5500-9000 01 2 Teacher/ 5000-8000 04 Shikshakarmi Grade 2 4500-7000 3 Peon regular 2550-3200 01 4 Sweeper (Temporary) Collector rate 01 Total 07 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Upper Primary schools have three classes, i.e. from class 6th to class 8th. Each class has about 35 students. For classes above 35 enrolments, one additional post of teacher/ Shikshakarmi is sanctioned. In each school, one Language Teacher (Hindi/ English/Sanskrit), one for Maths, one for Science and one from Arts background is to be ensured. Performance in reference to appointment of teachers: Recruitment of teachers Sanctioned in Recruited by Honorarium Selected by FAB till 08-09 March 09 Regular Para Regular Para Regular Para State/ Distt./ p. m. Community Primary 18 0 18 0 Rs. 7000 0 State Up. Primary 912 0 75 0 Rs. 8200 0 State Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Number of single teacher schools: Primary level: 5652 and Upper Primary level: 376 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 76 Strategies of the districts/ state for achieving the goal of no school with single teacher in 2009-10: The State authorities have indicated that these schools wilt be provided with teachers on priority basis in 2009-10. Information on PTR Number of schools in respect of PTR State >40 >50 >60 >70 >80 >100 PTR 9247 7260 2773 939 30 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Highlight States/districts with higher PTR: No district has PTR > 40:1. Strategies of the state to reduce the PTR: -- Requirement of teachers based on the enrollment of the current year (separately for PS and UPS) Total requirement of Additional Number proposed in 2009- Gap teachers ( as per PTR of 40:1) 10 0 0 0 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 c. School readiness: Inputs and processes related to school level preparation: As per the State Plans, in 2008 - 09 the State didn’t avail the increased rates of school grants to make use of available kitty in other necessary items. This year, state has decided to make use of maximum resources directly to schools, hence the revised school grants @ Rs. 5000/- for primary & Rs. 7000/- for Upper Primary will be made available to schools. Schools will be asked to procure items of their requirements and will be given some suggestive guidelines like daily newspapers, radio, school wall decoration, blackboard paintings, maintenance of school garden, plantation, regular wall magazines etc. This year, schools will be requested to focus on the following areas while planning for the use of school and maintenance grants: • Repair and white-wash of schools before the opening of schools to welcome children • Dress-up the walls with various visual aids/ class-wise learning materials • Inspiring quotes for unity and national integration • Barah khadi, numbers, letters on the walls of classes 1 and 2 • Planning for the opening day welcome ceremony at village/ school level & distribution of textbooks on the same day • Planning for the welcome/ transfer of all children from nearby Anganwadis in class 1 of nearest primary school & all children passed out from primary to nearest Upper Primary in class 6^^' Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 77 Overall progress of Grant Distribution (Teacher grant, School grant, TLE grant) Distribution of Grants Progress in 2008-09 Proposal for 2009- 10 Physical Achievem Percentage of Physical Financial Target ent Achievement a. Teacher grant @ Rs. 500/- per teacher Primary level 73542 73441 99.9 83546 417.730 Upper Primary level 42400 40792 96.2 50792 253.960 b. School grant Primary level @ Rs. 5000/-per 100 32873 32873 32837 school 1641.850 Upper Primary level @ Rs. 7000/- 13220 13220 100 13192 923.440 per school______c. TLE grant New Primary schools@ 10,000/- 89 0.200 per school______New Upper Primary schools® 401 200.50 25 1 50,000/-per school______Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Plans for effective utilization of school grant and TLE grant in 2009-10: Following measures will be taken by the State for effective utilization of the grants. • Immediate release of grants before the session begins • Direct transfer of grants into school accounts • Mapping of syllabus by teachers to have an idea of various TLMs required in that particular class which he/ she is going to teach in the next session • Identification of best TLM developing teachers through competitions • Invitation of low-cost, hand-made class-wise/ subject-wise TLM kit designs • Finalizing the designs-class.-wise/ subject-wise within Rs. 500/- (by June) • Plan for developing effective kit not possible within the available TLM grant from LEP budget • TLM development workshops at cluster level Observation: It is good to note that the State has plaimed for effective utilisation of the grants in the schools. At the same time the Appraisal Team feels that the State should promote some more interventions at the school level. Schools should look at the learning difficulties of students and factors related to school in a careful manner. Accordingly they should try to prepare the school so that every emerging issue is suitably addressed. For example, if there is a shortage of teaching leaming materials related to fractions, or, solar eclipse, or, reading materials in the school, then the school should fill up these gaps by purchasing or, developing such materials at school level. In this connection, nearby CRC and BRC should play a pro - active role in identifying such issues and help the school in designing appropriate strategies. Other than this, the schools should also try to make themselves more child-friendly and inclusive to attract children and promote more of active leaming in and around schools. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 78 d. Curriculum and textbooks: Information about Curriculum/ Syllabus Available Curriculum Available Plans for Year of Whether with Stage developed with Tr. Based on further renewal Publishd Schools/ Trainers renewal by Trs. Primary SCERT 2008-09 Yes Yes NCF 2005 Upper Recently Primary SCERT 2008-09 Yes Yes Yes NCF 2005 developed Source: AWP & SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 As per the State Pedagogy Coordinator, SCERT has developed State level curriculum document for elementary level and at the same time Districts under the guidance of SCERT have developed own District level curriculum documents for elementary level in 2008 - 09. As per the State Plan, through Govt, order has been made, the State has made Children’s magazines - Bachpan and Balmitra as the part of regular curriculum. These regular quarterly magazines are being used as supplementary textual materials in the schools across the State. Every child in the State is provided with a copy of the journals quarterly. These magazines, till now developed as infotainment journals, are now being redesigned as workbooks in different subject areas to help the'students carry out activities and exercises in the classrooms in different concept areas and acquire clarity and understanding through peer collaboration and assistance fiom teachers. Development of textual materials: As per the State Plan, SCERT is responsible for develo|Hnent of new textbooks. Printing and distribution of textbooks is done through the State Textbook Corporation (TBC). The State has a detailed textbook development plan. Every year, new textbooks for particular classes are Introduced after proper piloting in sample schools. Feedback on textbooks is invited every year and changes are made accordingly. Textbooks are developed mainly in Hindi, English and Urdu language. The following table throws light on the status of textbooks. Information about Textbooks Agency Plan for Agency Year of First year of Languages that further Class that last publication of textbooks develops renewal publishes renewal new textbooks published in textbooks Class I SCERT TBC 2003-04 2006-07 Hindi, Every year Class II SCERT TBC 2003-04 2006-07 English, the State Class III SCERT TBC 2004-05 2007-08 Urdu improves Class IV SCERT TBC 2005-06 2008-09 the quality Class V SCERT TBC 2006-07 2008-09 of textbooks Class VI SCERT TBC 2003-04 2006-07 based on Class VII SCERT TBC 2004-05 2007-08 feedback Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 79 from Class teachers and SCERT TBC VIII 2005-06 2008-09 parents Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhatl isgarh 2009 - Information about Learning Materials other than Textbooks: Stage Materials Mats Supple Work Teacher’s Self Children’s Any other for tribal for mentary books Newsletter learning Journals materials children CWSN Readers materials PS Local Braille Wall calendar Being NCERT’s Bachpan Pratham textual books Developed journals for Reading materials teachers are materials for MLE circulated up UPS Braille Wall calendar Being to school Wall Balmitra Meena books Developed level calendar- kits and English CDs Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Some information about the above materials is provided below. a. MLE Materials: MLE materials are developed by districts after getting orientation on developing different types of tribal materials. Big books, small books, theme webs, picture books, local stories are collected & being used in schools for better comprehension among tribal children. b. Wall Calendars: School teachers are trained to make use of wall papers and regularly publish their own school wall paper with the support of school children. Students read these materials with great interest. c. NCERT publications: Teachers are provided subscriptions to various educational magazines like Primary Teachers, Indian Education, The Reflective Teacher, etc. d. Bachpan/ Balmitra: Each student is provided quarterly magazine for children. These magazines are used in their day to day teaching in classrooms. e. Pratham reading materials: Pratham has developed reading materials for children who lack the basic reading skills. This small booklet is used by children to develop their basic skills. f Room to Read Libraries: One block Kurud from Dhamtari district has been selected for this pilot project. Books are given to these selected schools "from Room to Read and teachers are also trained to maintain and run school libraries. There is a plan to expand these school libraries. g. Meena Kits and Meena CDs: Meena CDs are provided in clusters so that community can see these CDs and have an awareness building campaign for girls education. Meena books are also provided for gender sensitization and improving reading habits. Distribution of Textbooks: Following table throws light on the progress and plan of the State to ensure timely distribution of textbooks to the eligible children in the 6 to 14 age group. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 80 Timeliness of Distribution of Free Textbooks Stage Academic session Month of distribution Proposed month for begins from in 2008-09 distribution in 2009-10 PS 15 June June, 2007 March to May, 2008 UPS 15 June June, 2007 March to May, 2008 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 As per the State Plan, SCERT provides the Camera Ready Copy to the Textbook Corporation. Textbook Corporation invites tender for printing and gives the order for the same. Printers are asked to distribute the books up to block level. At the block level, the Higher Secondary School is identified as the storage and distribution centre. Principal and Coordinators get honorarium for working as Nodal Officers of distribution centre. All the Cluster Coordinators are asked to take the textbooks immediately and get them distributed to schools. Textbook Corporation has given the textbook distribution plan which states that they will start this task fi*om 25*^ March and will complete by 25*^ May, 2009. The State has provided a detailed date wise break up for distribution of textbooks in different blocks of each district in 2009 - 10. The SPO monitors the progress of textbook distribution by collecting information from districts and also by sending monitoring teams to the districts in the time of free textbook distribution. No on toward incident such as mis-utilization of textbooks has been reported from the State. Following table provides a break up of the class wise cost of textbooks. Cost of a complete set of textbooks for each class Class Class 1 Cl. II Cl. Ill Cl. IV C1.V Cl. VI Cl. VII Cl. VIII Cost 70.00 80.00 120.00 120.00 110.00 190.00 210.00 240.00 - Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009-1 Proposal for 2009 -10: Target, Achievement & Proposal Stage Target for 2008-09 Achievemctnt during Proposal for 2009-10 20081-09 - Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial PS 2362937 2017.451 2362937 2017.451 2425721 2317.236 UPS 896240 1706.842 896240 1706.842 943046 1964.323 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Proposal: The State has proposed to provide tree textbooks to 2425721 Primary children @ Rs. 100.00 per child and to 943046 Upper Primary children @ Rs. 210.00 per child in 2009 - 10. Recommendation: The Appraisal Team appreciates that the State has managed to distribute free textbooks to all eligible children in the beginning of the academic session The Team recommends the proposal of the State for PAB approval. e. Use of Teaching Learning Materials: Progress regarding effective use of TLM grants in 2008-09: As per the Plans, the State organized a state level workshop on TLM development in Mahasamund district. All the districts participated in it and were asked to share the experiences Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 81 in different district level workshops. Districts are also asked to arrange cluster level workshops on TLM development with the expert teachers’ guidance and using the TLM grant during the workshops to develop materials. Last year, DIETs were also asked to get the TLM raw material shop in their premises and ensuring all teachers to make their own TLM from the funds available with them. TLM grant was also released through DIETs during teachers training. At the same time the Plans have indicted that, due to certain constraints, these practices are not followed now-a-days. The Plans have indicated that in 2008 - 09, it was ensured that TLM & other grants reach schools in time so that the whole session can benefit from tliem. Time to time guidelines based on feedbacks are given to districts for effective utilization of these grants. Teachers are also asked to put the manufacturing date of TLM so that different TLM could be made from the funds released every year. Now the focus is on developing different materials for teaching of science and social science effectively. No. of schools using materials other than textbooks and nature of materials being used: Primary 31863 600 1.88% Material for teaching tribal children developed locally by districts______28000 87.88% Interactive Radio Programmes 31863 100.00% Supplementary Reading Materials - Bachpan 400 1.26% Computer Aided Learning 31863 100.00% Reading cards with Pratham support 8000 25.10% MGML materials by SCERT 30 0.24% EDC developed MMCDs to teach English 200 1.60% English Kit by Pratham in Mahasamund district 180 1.44% Room to Read Library materials Up. Pry. 12486 12486 100.00% Supplementary Reading Materials - Balmitra 2200 17.62% Computer Aided Learning 200 1.60% English Kit by Pratham in Mahasamund district Inputs and processes related to effective use of TLMs in 2009-10 (appropriate TLMs development through TLM grant and their effective use): As per the State Plans, in 2009 - 10, state level competitions will be organized to plan for the effective use of TLM in schools. Details are narrated below. Invitation for the Class-wise/ subject-wise model TLM kit Each teacher is provided Rs. 500/- per annum for developing various teaching learning materials to make her/ his classroom teaching more attractive and interesting. Teachers have the liberty to utilize this grant as per their choice. Most of the teachers want to make effective TLM from this grant but they don’t have any model in front of them. Some of them have made proper use and have made innovative TLM based on their textbooks. But these innovations are limited with them only. These innovative practices and TLM could be disseminated if we organize a class- wise & subject-wise TLM competition. Under this proposal, following activities are proposed: • Designing & developing a brochure for TLM competition • Dissemination of information regarding the competition in all schools in the month of Aril- may via newspaper/ radio/ during teachers training as well Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 82 • Motivating teachers to design whole class or subject-wise TLM • Each TLM kit to be limited within Rs. 500/- expenses • One complete TLM kit may cover one whole class or one subject for different class • For Upper Primary, subject-wise TLM will be preferred. Each subject for class to 8‘^. • Competition at district level on a particular day in August 1 st week • District level team may make improved kit clubbing the ideas from different participants • Districts will finalize class-wise/ subject-wise final kit • In state level competition, the best TLM kits will be selected. • In district level, for top 10 categories @ Rs. 1000/- each will be distributed. • In state level, for top 10 categories @ Rs. 5000/- each will be distributed. • For TLM development, sharing workshop & competitions, each district will get Rs. 25,000/- for organizing workshop, TA/DA & other arrangements. For state level competition, Rs. 50000 will be required. • TLM above the limit of Rs. 500/- for science/ math kits may be referred for finalizing from Learning Enhancement Program ftinds. Expected outcome: • Class-wise/ subject-wise TLM kit guidelines in book form (like recipe) • Outside Govt, organizations/ private teachers may also take part in this competition. • Model Science/ Math kit for Primary/ Upper Primary level (Textbook based-prototype) Observation: This is a good initiative of the State to promote development of appropriate TLMs for schools. Such a competition and meticulous peer reviewing will certainly contribute to better understanding among teachers. *At the same time it is crucial to think about how such materials could be effectively utilized in the schools. The teacher training progranmies, academic follow up by CRCs/ BRCs should also be linked to this. This will ensure that teachers use these materials effectively to strengthen their pedagogical processes in and around schools. f. Active pedagogy: Shifts in teacher instructional time, student learning opportunity time, and active student participation: Inputs and processes related to pedagogy: As per the State Plans, the State in its teachers training programmes, focused on the following areas: • Basic reading, numeracy and communication skills at primary level • Using multiple intelligence far delivery of topics in class • Active-learning & Mind-mapping techniques at upper primary level • Learning by doing for science related activities • English kits from various sources to improve communication skills • Use of various CDs to teach math, science, English & other subjects Appraisal Report Chhattrsgarh 2009 -10 Page 83 Observation: These are good initiatives of the State in 2008 - 09 to improve the quality of pedagogical processes in classroom. However the question is how much these have percolated into classroom processes across the State. State Team has clarified that there is shift in classroom from the past as in every class one can see the reflection of students’ learning achievement across the state. Also it is reflected in school records. This is an improvement over past. At the same time the question arises regarding the need for changes in classroom processes. For example, are the science classrooms more exploratory? Are the language classrooms more print - rich and interactive in nature? Without these shifts one may not be able to expect much in terms of students’ learning levels. The State and District Pedagogy Teams need to think about this critically and strive for pedagogical shifts in classroom processes. Inputs, processes, and expected outcomes related to promoting active pedagogy in 2009-10: In 2009 - 10, following measures would be undertaken to improve the classroom processes: 1. Classroom climate • Teachers’ positive/ fiiendly behavior towards students-homely treatment • Clean, properly lit, well ventilated and properly maintained school • Students should be able to work independently once the teacher takes the class • Materials should be relevant to the task to be undertaken • Students able to interact/ communicate easily with the teacher • Be exposed to a variety of experiences • Work at bis/ her own pace/ style 2. Classroom organization and management • Improved class-size & teacher-pupil ratio in schools • Less preference to “whole class” teaching approach • Regular change in seating arrangements as per topic • Front seats to children with disability & hurdle-free environment • Subjects divided into small manageable units 3. Opportunity time • Reduced non-teaching tasks • Effective use of time for active participation of students • Engaging children in teaching-learning activities • Increasing opportunity time by teachers and students 4. Teaching-learning methodologies • Child-centred, activity based approach, joyfiil learning • Teaming by doing, experiencing and active participation on the part of the child • Handling multi-grade teaching situation • Exploration/ discovery approach while teaching • Initiating various projects, dramatization, excursion trips, songs, puppetry & paintings Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 84 5. Teacher-pupil interactions • Effective communicative strategies with children • Use of both verbal and non-verbal communication skills • Praising students’ efforts make them more courageous and problem solvers 6. Learning assessment • Continuous and comprehensive assessment (CCA) • Formative and summative assessment • Improvements in assessment systems • Innovative students’ assessment techniques s All efforts to improve students’ achievement level • Remedial coaching & error analysis Observation: Theoretically it is a sound plan and as per the State Plans, processes related to most of the above indicators have started in the State through various interventions. This is a commendable effort and needs to be further strengthened. At the same time the Appraisal Team feels that all the inputs and processes related to these need to be integrated and focused to give it the desire direction. g. Learning Enhancement Programme (Pry. and Upper Pry.): For tbe State 2009 - 10 wiB be the second year of Learning Enhancement Program. As per the Plans, the State will continue most of the program launched last year with some improvements based on last year’s learning. Progress in the area of LEP is as-follows: Progress in activities under Learning Enhancement Programme (LEP) in 2008 - 09 SNo. Type of activities Coverage (no. of a. Duration Overall progress Activities yet to be carried out under districts/ b. schools/ c. ofLEP till date carried out LEP children being -activities covered) I Primary level - 1. Reading All PS/ all districts/ all Throughout Reading cards Second set of cards Development children from classes 1 the year pertaining to textbooks is also re^dy for Program to 5 developed through distribution workshops 2. English training with All PS of Mahasamund Throughout Training of teachers in Pratham support district/ PS of the year all places is over. Next Gariaband/ Mainpur/ round of training Chhura/ Deobhog expansion planned district of Raipur Dhamtari district all blocks Durg district one block 3. Establishing School All Ashram shalas, Throughout Books being libraries selected PS of the year distributed. Training Dhamtari, Raipur planned. districts Total 3000 schools to be covered under this program. 4. Learning 500 children from each Three “Education initiatives” Data collection & Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 85 SNo. Type of activities Coverage (no. of a. Duration Overall progress Activities yet to be carried out under districts/ b. schools/ c. of LEP till date carried out LEP children being activities covered) Enhancement class for each subject months has given the training. analysis remaining Tracking from each block Field work is going on. II Upper Primary level: I. English training with All PS of Mahasamund Throughout Training of teachers in Pratham support district/ PS of the year all places is over. Next Gariaband/ “Mainpur/ round of training & Chhura/ Deobhog expansion planned district of Raipur Dhamtari district all blocks Durg district one block 2. Active Learning All KGB Vs, All UPS of Throughout Field visit to Tamil Material Kurud, Magarlod of the year Nadu made. Training development for Dhamtari district, all of Resource person/ reference UPS of Rajnandgaon KGBV teachers district and 50-50 complete. DIETs & schools from each SCERT involved. district. Total about 5000 schools covered 3. Science/ Math All tribal hostels will be Throughout Meeting with Vigyan Books/ materials initiatives at Upper covered in this along the year Prasar from Vigyan Prasar primary level with KGBVs. Total Four -workshops to be procured. 2000 schools will be organized with covered. Science clubs Science experts will be formed. In the suggested by Ed.CIL first phase, Bilaspur, Another round of Korba & Koriya workshops to design districts are covered prot€>type of science/ with Vigyan Prasar math kit very soon support. 4. Science/ Math lab 5662 schools to be Throughout NCERT is requested Gol intervention is covered under this the year to provide math/ requested to program. This will science kits. Ed.CIl is expedite the include both primary & also requested to process. Upper Primary schools support in this regard. 5. Establishing School All Tribal hostels, Throughout Procurement of books libraries selected UPS of the year being done. Schools Dhamtari, Raipur identified, instructions districts Total 1891 issued. Training schools to be covered planned. under this program. Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Following programmes are to be taken up this year from LEP budget at elementary level: 1. Read Chhattisgarh program for primary level : State provided different sets of reading cards for primary level. In the initial sets, there were no numbers in the cards. So some cards were missing and teachers were not able to keep the record of the cards being used. When the number of cards started increasing, it was decided that the cards will be given numbers for recognition and proper handling. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 86 Series of workshops were organized to develop textbook based cards and give sufficient interested reading materials to quench the thirst of students and improve reading habits & create interests. Both L2R and R2L will be repeated this year and some more cards will be developed for distribution in schools. Baseline, mid-term and end line will be taken to assess the difference due to the use of these cards in classrooms. Main focus of this program will be to improve early reading and mathematics skills at primary level and reading habits at Upper primary level. This year, for Upper Primary level as well, a set of cards will be provided under Read Chhattisgarh program. At state level, technology assisted, time-bound reading program through radio will be tried with Pratham & EDC support. Budget for the above program is Rs. 500/- per Primary & Upper Primary school. Outcomes expected: • All schools will make use o f available cards in their schools. • Students will take interest in self-reading activities & discuss about the cards. • Teachers will be able to identify different reading materials themselves and try to provider them in schools. 2. Read Chhattisgarh program for Upper Primary level : State will provide different reading & other activity cards for Upper Primary level. Outcomes expected: • All Upper Primary schools will make use o f available cards in their schools. • Students will take interest in self-reading activities & discuss about the cards. • Teachers will be able to identify different reading materials themselves and try to provider them in schools. 3. MGML pedagogy in Primary schools: The State has initiated piloting of MGML pedagogy in the line of ABL of Tamilnadu in about 8,000 Primary Schools of 40 blocks of all districts. The State aims to take up another 8,000 Primary schools. 4. Active Learning Method at Upper Primary level: Last year, a team from DIETs was sent to Chennai to see the implementation of Active Learning Methodology in their Upper Primary Schools. Teachers from selected schools were given training by DIETs to introduce Active learning methodology. Apart from this, teachers from Upper Primary Schools were trained on the use of Active learning, multiple intelligence, mind-mapping techniques, constructive approach. Bloom’s technique and lesson planning. This year, districts are planning for the following under Active leaming- • Implementation of Active learning in all KGBV, selected UPS • Developing and distribution of calendar with active learning pedagogy explained through illustrations and examples • Self-reading materials containing lesson plans, different ideas for active learning Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 87 Budget for the above program is Rs. 200/- per Upper Primary school and in selected number of Upper Primary schools as per budget available in the districts. Outcomes expected: • Selected Upper Primary schools will have the lesson plans with them. • Schools will make use o f active learning pedagogy. • Teachers will get the idea o f active learning pedagogy through self-learning materials/ calendars and make use o f them in the classrooms. • There will he an increase in the students ’ active learning time. 5. School Improvement Plans: Last year, DIETs identified poor performing schools and gave the required treatment to improve the situation. The same program with some improvements as per previous learning will be implemented. Some software to track the poor performing schools will also be developed. Schools will also have hand writing improvement & other programs to improve students’ performance. Outcomes expected: • Districts will be able to identify poor performing schools. • Different activities to improve the poor performing schools. • Improvements in school performance. 6. Science and Maths, clubs for Primary/ Upper Primary level : Last year, state received support from Vigyan Prasar to introduce and establish Science/ Math clubs at Upper primary schools. This was introduced as a pilot in selected tribal hostels of Bilaspur, Korba and Koria district. After three months of functioning by Science clubs, scaling was done in all districts. Second workshop with Vigyan Prasar was organized in Durg and all districts were informed about various possible activities and design plans for the fimctioning of Science/ Math clubs. Detailed guidelines are also given to districts to make use of the funds available for the ftmctioning of Vigyan Clubs. Activities like celebrating different memorable days like Birthday of James Watt, Darwin, Edison and remembering the contributions made by them, procuring different items like binocular, lenses, rain water measurement instrument, thermometer etc., sky observation, wall magazines, lectures & examination tips by different experts, collection and observation of different activities related to their life like the crops in different seasons, clothes, food items used during different seasons etc., observing CDs developed by Vigyan Prasar and doing experiments with their support. State tried to get the Science, Math kit developed by NCERT but couldn’t get it. Next year also, the same will be tried and if not made available, funds for the same will be used to expand the number of schools to cover Science/ Math clubs. Budget for the program for new schools to be covered is Rs. 5000/- for a maximum of 200 schools (priority to cover one or two blocks completely as per budget available) Outcomes expected: • Selected schools will have their science/ math clubs formed. ® Schools will conduct different activities related to science/ math • Students will develop a taste for learning the concepts o f science/ math Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 88 • Schools will get regular newsletters from VIPNET. 7. Supply of Educational Multi-media CDs : State provides computers in schools from the funds available in CAL innovations. Funds for providing CDs in these CAL Schools were made available from LEP budget. Districts were given one set of about 80 CDs received from EDC, APF, Vigyan Prasar. Districts were asked to make the copies of these CDS as per the number of CAL schools and make them available with training on how to use these CDs. This year, again, various CDs developed in CIET will be procured & supplied to these schools. Copies of Delhi CALTOONs will be brought and distributed to schools. Orientation program on haw to use these CDs will be arranged in these schools. The same CDs will be used in the hostels where remedial teaching sessions are organized and for the training of teachers. Budget for this program will be Rs. 1500/- per CAL school depending upon the number of schools with computers in the district. Outcomes expected: • All CAL schools will have different sets of new CDs for use. • Teachers from CAL schools will be oriented on the basis of available CDs & their usage in different subjects.. • Schools will make use o f these CDs during teachers training/ remedial teaching. 8. Students’ achievement tracking; This year, state organized the large scale testing of students from classes 3 to 8* on Math and language. 500 students from each class, each block for each subject was taken as sample and testing was done in the month of January, 2009. Results of the test will be made available in the month of April. Video shooting of classroom procedures will also be taken to have a better understanding of problems related to the comprehension of concepts. Next year, the same program will continue with UNICEF support and the students’ achievements will be tested. The results of this year will help the state in designing the teachers training program. Budget for this program will be Rs. 1000/- per school for printing of question papers and testing in classrooms. Rest amount will be matched from UNICEF. Outcomes expected: • State will have the achievement o f two continuous years. • Different sets o f question papers will be made available to schools. • Teachers training needs will be made available to training institutes. 9. Implementation of ADEPTs program: This is the second year of ADEPTS implementation. State has given wide range of training from BRCCs to all teachers on ADEPTS related issues. All Cluster coordinators were also asked to follow certain norms to become an effective coordinator. For next year, some more pedagogical standards will be decided for schools, cluster and block level Coordinators. Next ADEPTS standards will mainly focus on improving classroom practices, effective-utilization of various grants, better community linkages, use of Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 89 technology based interventions, outcome based students performance etc. Total 15 sets of new standards will be decided through various discussions and observations by the districts. Outcomes expected: • State will have the new set ofADEPTS standards for schools & Resource Centres • Rigorous monitoring will be done for the implementation of set standards in schools 10. Graded Reader: SCERT has developed a graded reader which will be distributed to all primary schools for reading improvement. Outcomes expected: Schools will get a set o f chatter cards for children to initiate discussions 11. English Learning Program: Last year state introduced teaching of English with the help of Pratham. Pratham provided English kits for teachers. The same will be replicated in more number of schools and some other English improvement programs will be introduced to improve the classroom teaching of English. Outcomes expected: Teachers as well as students will improve their English _ 12. Interactive Radio Instruction Program (IRI) : This is the fourth year of IRI program in the state. Every year, teachers are trained for the use of IRI program in classrooms. This year, districts will check whether the schools have functional radio with them or not. In case of lack of proper sets, they will be asked to procure a better set from the fimds available in school grant. Strong monitoring mechanism will also be put in place for regular and timely usage of this program. Science/ Math and English are taught through radio and teachers teaching skill is improved through the regular use. It will also be ensured that all schools have the teachers’ manual containing all lessons and the details of activities. Reading improvement program will also be introduced this year with Pratham & EDC support. Budget for this program will be Rs. 20,000/- per block for the payment of broadcast fee to All India Radio. Printing of Teachers manual will also be done as per requirement from this fund. Outcomes expected: • State will have the Interactive Radio broadcast for next year. • Teachers will practice different innovative pedagogy & TLM in classrooms. • Students will learn language skills, basics of science/ math activities. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 90 Consolidated proposal: Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgath 2009 - 10 Informati on about Learning Enhancement programme SNo. District Cost for Learning % Cost to total outlay Enhancement Programme of District 1. Bastar 210 1.9486242 2. Bijapur 79 1.6485209 3. Bilaspur 195 1.9756983 4. Dantewada 156 1.886625 5 Dhamtari 69 1.9618898 6 Durg 168 1.9869068 7 Janjgir-Champa 152 1.9774225 8 Jashpur 92 1.9252934 9 Kanker 90 1.9696529 10 Kawardha 89 1.970661 11 Korba 95 1.9471274 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 91 SNo. District Cost for Learning % Cost to total outlay Enhancement Programme of District 12 Korea 58 1.962325 13 Mahasamund 75 1.9632161 14 Narayanpur 27 1.6866594 15 Raigarh 114 1.9580047 16 Raipur 297 1.9726469 17 Rajnandgaon 87 1.9582485 18 Surguja 279 1.9791446 Total 2332.000 1.945 Source: AWP & B, SSA, 2009-10 Recommendation: Each activity related to LEP was discussed at length with the State Team and was revised in the form of the above table. The Appraisal Team recommends it for PAB approval. h. Strengthening learning assessment: Following table throws light on the students’ learning assessment system in the State. Learning Assessment System Stage No. of Whether No- Board Is there Frequency tests in a marking detention exam, at any of sharing year or grading from which which report with system > class class card? parents Primary 7 Marking - 5th Yes 3 U.Pry. 7 Marking - 8th Yes 3 Source; AWP & B, SSA, 2009-10 Plans for strengthening learning assessment in 2009-10: As per the Plans, the State has already initiated various improvements in the learning assessment systems trough SCERT. This year, after getting the source book from NCERT, all teachers, CACs & BRCCs will get special orientation based on the source book. As per the guidelines given in NCERT’s Sourcebooks on learning assessment, various improvements will be made in the system through SCERT. Strategies for identifying learning difficulties and providing Remedial support: State has facilitated remedial teaching in all tribal hostels and Ashram Shalas. State organized this activity in two models: Model One: In this model, all tribal Ashram Shalas and hostels were selected and all the students from class 1®‘ to 8*^ were given coaching and the day scholars of the villages were also asked to attend the classes. Model Two: In this model. Tribal Welfare Department (TWD) has identified 50 hostels where additional students from other schools may be brought in for five to seven days and given remedial teaching by other teachers in the presence & support of their school teachers. Special Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 92 training were organized for this remedial classes and nearby poor performing schools were identified for remedial teaching. The following table shows progress of remedial teaching in 2008-09. Physical Target Fund Physical Financial % of (Children) allocated in achievement achievement achievement 2008-09 till March, till March, Phy Fin 2009 2009 199882 399.76 108692 280.342 54 - 70 Source: AWP & B, SSA, 2009-10 Plan for Remedial Teaching in 2009-10: In 2009 - 10, the same two models will be followed. lEC materials for publicity & monitoring by community, special training and handbooks to organize remedial classes, identification of poor performing schools and areas of difficulty during the analysis of answer sheets will be done. The students who receive supplementary will be given special remedial coaching by the newly recruited Shikshakarmis and this will be treated as their field training. Remedial Teaching Unit cost Phy. Fin. Remedial Teaching 0.0020 199371 398.742 Sub Total 199371 398.742 Source: AWP & B, SSA, 2009-10 Recpmmendation: Progress of the State in 2008-09 is satisfactory. Based on this the Appraisal Team recommends remedial teaching in 2009 - 10 as per SSA norms @ Rs. 200 per chilld for children from 5% schools in districts where the female literacy rate is below the national female literacy average. i. Teacher preparation: SCERT is the nodal agency to take care of teacher preparation. There are two Govt. Institutions, i.e. Institute of Advance Studies in Education (lASE), Bilaspur & College of Teacher Education (CTE), Raipur. Every district is having District Institute of Education & Training (DIET). Apart from this, state has more than 70 private B.Ed. Colleges and now a few institutions have also started 2 year Diploma courses. Govt. DIETs have the capacity of minimum 50 students every year, some have increased the seats as per their infrastructure availability. B.Ed. colleges have the capacity of around 10,000 pupil teachers get trained. This year, state is trying to involve private B.Ed. Colleges during summer to provide teachers’ training in summer vacations using their available infrastructure within SSA norms. • In-service training: Nature and focus areas of Training Modules (for Trainers and Teachers) developed in 2008-09: 20 days Primary 20 days Upper Primary 30 days for new recruits Pravah/ Parakh/ ADEPTS/ Pravah/ Parakh/ ADEPTS/ Content and contextual Pratham/ ILFS- Hostel warden APF/ILFS- Hostel warden areas Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 93 20 days Primary 20 days Upper Primary 30 days for new recruits training, English Relay kit/ training, English Relay kit Navanirmiti / EDC/ Nandi/ , subject specific training, APF/RCyPPT making/ KGBV teachers training / Pratham/ RCI Reading, Writing skill Arts group- Hindi, NCF 2005, girls Numbers, Decimals, Sanskrit & Social Science education, inclusive Place values, fraction, Science Group- Math, education, geometry, living-non-living, Science & English constructivism, TLM, water resources, pollution, Evaluation, Health & diseases, MGML Package, IRI, Academic Monitoring, Hygiene, Peace Tribal Education, TLM development etc. at education, service rules, Academic Monitoring, TLM cluster level various Govt. Schemes development etc. at cluster level Subject-based exercises Morning-Yoga classes Morning-Yoga classes Morning-Yoga classes Evening- Quiz, cultural Evening- Quiz, cultural Evening- Quiz, cultural programmes programmes programmes Film show and group Film show and group Film show and group discussions discussions discussions Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 The following table provides information about the progress of teacher training during 2008-09. Type of Duration Months in which Target Teachei:s Percentage of training of training undertaken (in 08 - 09) trained Achievement (till Dec. end) Primary 20 days April to March 73342 55000 75% U. Pry. 20 days April to March 42300 25000 59% Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 The details of the training progggmmes is given below: SNo. Types of Duration Content Process Follow up Performance Training activities indicators 1 PS/ UPS 5 days Subject-based Textbook Implications in Clear concept of Teachers April-May training focused classroom Subject teaching Training- teaching methods 2 Block level 5 days Student’s Evaluation Cascade Monitoring by Use of stress-free training of National Curriculum mode SCERT/SPO/DI evaluation in Primary School Framework Block ET/ DPO classrooms Teachers Academic Implementing in Group trained classrooms by SCERT 3 DIET level 5 days Subject Training Face to face Implementing in Removing training of Upper National Curriculum training by classrooms difficulties in Primary Framework DIETS Follow up in different subjects Teachers cluster level meeting 4 PS/ UPS 3 days Interactive Radio Activity- Continuous Using radio teachers’ training June- Instructions by EDC based mode monitoring & effectively, at Cluster level August Basic Reading Skills visit to schools, regularly in bv Pratham analysis _ of classrooms Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 94 SNo. Types of Duration Content Process Follow up Performance Training activities indicators diaries to see the Baseline study of progress students on basic reading skills & continuous treatment for effective reading 5 Intel Training to 5 days Use of Computers Using the Orientation of Teachers will be PS/ UPS for classroom district level School principals able to use Teachers in CAL teaching computer labs Monitoring of computers in Schools Microsoft office Training by schools to see classrooms Developing various INTEL the use of They can use power point experts computer internet to find presentations assisted lessons out different Lesson plans Training of teaching materials Use of internet fellow teachers They will be able Developing web by the trained to train other pages teachers to get teachers the certificate 6 Group Teaching 01 day Using computer for Practical Monitoring of Teachers will be Learning to PS/ large classes experiences schools able to handle UPS Teachers Use of various (equal Demo to other large classes for (GTL) MMCDs in participation) school students using limited Use of digital classrooms Using the number of library For group studies content to other computers teachers during Understand the training interactive pedagogy 7 Students 02 days With the help of El How to Actual testing Resuhs awaited evaluation conduct evaluation 8 Training to form 2 days Details of Meena & hands on Teachers from Teachers will Meena Manch at other characters experience in other schools support the girls UPS level Formation of Meena schools, participate in the to form the Meena Manch,. Meena especially training & are manch/ Meena room KGBV expected to form Rooms in schools the same in their School girls will schools support the Trained teachers education of girls are expected to orient other teachers Active Learning 5 days Blooms taxonomy, Activity Training to other Using mind maps, MI, Constr. based, lesson teachers at MI in classrooms Pedagogy plans Cluster level 10 Science 5 days Different Actual Training at Schools to demo Experiments experiments demonstratio cluster level science n experiments 11 Academic 1 day Online Entries Practice At Cluster level Online entries I monitoring 12 DISE training 1 day Filling format Practice At Cluster level Filling the formats 13 Using School 2 days Functional library Activity- At block level Effective use of libraries based books 4 Handwriting 7 days How to improve Guided Training at Improved hand Improvement writing practice block/ cluster writing of level students Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 95 SNo. Types of Duration Content Process Follow up Performance Training activities indicators 15 ADEPTS 1 day !5 point Discussion Monitoring Implementation of implementation 15 points 16 Using Teachers’ 1 day Reflections Self-study Analysis of Reflective diary diaries teachers 17 Innovative 5 days Material Contextual Research support Using local teaching development materials materials methods for tribal 18_ Conducting 3 days Difficult subjects Interactions Classes in Remedial classes remedial classes selected places 19 Training on 3 days Spoken English Practice to Monitoring of Use of English in English kit develop schools Classrooms confidence 20 R2L Training 3 days Reading skill Practice Cluster level Classroom usage training Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Challenges/ issues related to teacher training in 2008-09: 1. Maximum portions to be covered during summer vacations-heat & teacher resistance 2. Timely preparations for training & printing of training modules 3. Getting required number of best RPs for training &locations with stay arrangements 4. Proper arrangement & facilities for training in the venue Reforms proposed in management of training on the basis of previous experiences: Display of details regarding stay/facilities/ in venue Quotations for food, stationery & other items Food & time management committee Clubbing teachers training with remedial teaching/ coaching for supplementary/ mainstreaming/ bridge course • One hour interactive phone-in radio program during state-wide training for seeking feedback & provide required support • Completing the textbook-based notes during training by each teacher for the subjects planned for next session's teaching • Provision of honorarium upto block level training especially during summer • Pre & post tests compulsory during training Excel-based computerized TA distribution system to avoid unnecessary wastage of time Proposal for in-service training for 2009-10: Block Academic 3-3 j Supportive SGERT RPs 5-5 days trmning at block level o n . Group ttaimng ^& ^hers: from different subjects level iM b lo c k * f c 2 District Resource 3-3 RPs from SCERT/ CTE 5-5 days training at district/ block Group training DIET level/ subject level on different subjects of subject experts experts Upper Primary level m v Trmning of teachers, ;^1PS teach^ :5^d^s tteihig Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 96 5 days subject training at BRCC/ ^nii^ofteachere UPS teachers DRG All DIET/ TWD hostels/ schools in 40-40 participants in a batch to be Hv Surnnier Different programs for hand Teachers/ Master Training on hand writing improvement students trainers writing trained by improvement Sulekh Improved classroom teaching - PS/UPS teachers ILFS MTS Subject-based English/ Math/ Science/ Social training Science ______., ..^ -I r ------'• ’ ------T"m i Pratham & Basic readmg/ math skills Read Chhattisgarh PS teachers MTs Program S66^h@glish proficien^^ p-;.. w.f ■- " Reading improvement Using reading cards PS/UPS teachers 1C 4i^^es-- -are estoblished:; Use of active pedagogy in UPS teachers of DIET Active Learning classrooms pedago^ selected schools Minimum 10 CAperiments in MTs trained Science Classrooms______— . experiments ^'iev V TV'-r^V t r-T:-; •'. :>’ /r.T.V’ Private B.Ed. Training on different relevant Training by private PS/ UPS teachers College issues B.Ed. Colleges teachers Uang comfateir aided ediication__ Better classroom teaching 20 learning situations Page 97 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 holders 21 Training on healtE" P^/ltJPSfea%ers ILFS ttain^d 22 Training on the use Head masters of RPs trained Timely completion & compilation of filling of PS/UPS by MIS of online DISE data & academic academic monitoring formats monitoring, DISE 2 3 . on ofMGp^kcar^s' 24 Traming on All PS/ UPS NCERT Better techniques for classroom evaluation teachers trained RPs evaluation techniques based on based on the the book by book NCERT designed 25. VI = Anal^is -■ s1udefit&^ K • sh y t3 ?-| ? r* **' 26 Training on the use PS/ UPS teachers Training by Other blocks will follow the same of various math/ of one one block different developing the materials by their science kit organizations own efforts. Selected organizations will be responsible for collection, compilation of BAS/ TAS .2T, 1, e 28 Training of teachers PS/UPS/ Hostel Expert Effective implementation of on sports activities teachers organizations sports activities 29 Training, ioi0i ■ conducting- ..mvolved"/- remedial teaching^Hp ■' ft ^ 30 Field-based training Newly recruited Peer training Remediation cum experience to for result PS/ liPS teachers based on . deal with poor performing improvement guidelines students making them ready for supplementary exams Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 • Induction Training: Following table throws light on the progress of induction training in 2008 - 09. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 98 Progress of Induction Teacher Training (during 2008-09) Stage Duration of Teachers Teachers trained Percentage of training recruited (up to end Mar) Achievement (up to end Mar) Pry/UP 30 days 13707 13707 100 % Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - Information about induction training in 2008-09: This year, for the first time, the State started the induction training in large scale. All the teachers recruited through examinations were asked to join DIET/ Block training for 20/30 days. The trained teachers were given 30 days training in one stretch and the untrained were enrolled for 20 days training in a stretch. Different training areas were identified and Master Trainers were oriented to conduct the training program. The focus was to give an idea of school related issues and give practical examples for school management. Proposal for induction training to be undertaken in 2009-10: As per the Plans, main contents of 20 days training and other practical issues were included in the training of newly recruited teachers. • Training of Untrained Teachers: Progress of training of untrained teachers is indicated below. Pro gress of Trainin ^ of Untrained Teachers (in MV9) ^ Stage Total No. of Target for Teachers Percentage of Untrained 60 days trained up to achievement teachers training 2008-09 Primary/ U. Pry. 84757 76540 76540 100% Information on duration of training, name of the course(s): Diploma in Primary Education (DPE): 2 yeare Correspondence Diploma by IGNOU Diploma in Education (D.ED.); 2 year correspondence course Issues and Strategies for covering untrained teachers in the state: State has no conipulsion for recruiting trained teachers. There is a huge gap between the output given by training institutes per year and the actual demand of teachers in schools. So the state has not made the professional training compulsory. Those who are trained get bonus marks while recruitment. Proposals for 2009-10: Type of Target for ’ training in Achievement % of achievement Target for 2009-10 training 20(18-09 Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial In-service 117957 1734.63 99748 1445.322 85 83 126121 1891.815 Induction 13707 411.22 13707 375.265 100 91 12276 368.286 Untrained 300 12.60 300 12.600 100 100 8217 493.020 BRCs, 2315 11.58 1220 7.307 53 63 2315 11.575 CRCs Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 99 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Recommendation: The Appraisal Team recommends the proposal for PAB approval j. Special initiatives for disadvantaged groups (such as MLE for tribal areas): State has initiated the innovative teaching methods for tribal children. This program is limited to classes I and II and focus on learning with the use of their own mother tongue in the initial stage and slowly shifts towards the regular language. A series of workshop has been arranged in districts and lot of materials are developed which helps teachers to teach using the local contexts. Presently, state is working in nine tribal dominated districts to develop local materials. Several workshops have been organized to develop such materials. Following districts are working in this area: SNo. District Tribal language 1 Dantewara Gondi (Mariya) 2 Bastar Halbi, Bhatri 3 Kanker Gondi 4 Dhamtari Kamar 5 Korba Birhor 6 Jashpur Sadri 7 Sarguja Surgujiya 8 Raigarh kudukh 9 Koriya Surgujiya Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Presently, SCERT has taken the charge of implementing and expansion of this program and they are working with DIETs to scale up the program and develop different materials for regular usage in classrooms. k. Effectiveness of CAL and other educational technologies in quality improvement: Progress in CAL activities in 2008-09 is reflected in following table: Progress in CAL activities SI. Activities approved Activities undertaken Coverage Partnership with Private No. for 2 0 0 8 -0 9 till date No. of No. of agency, if any schools children 1 Supply of Schools are provided 425 24000 CDs being used are Computers in computers provided by APF Schools under CAL Training to teachers are given by Intel 2 Study on the impact Sample schools 20 300 Azim Premji Foundation is of teaching through selected doing this study from its CAL Baseline tests taken own resources with Staff orientation in partnership in the area of Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 100 SI. Activities approved Activities undertaken Coverage Partnership with Private No. for 2008-09 till date No. of No. of agency, if any schools children progress teachers training and other logistic support.______Training of girls Girls studying in 20 2000 INTEL Staff is giving from KGBV on the KGB Vs are given training to girls studying in use of coniputers training on the use of KGBVs directly during computers directly by holidays. INTEL Computers in Model 100 MCSs are 100 3000 IT department, Gol is Cluster Schools provided computers & funding for this program the teachers are trained through CHIPS. for the use of computers. For further training, funds to recruit local staff is allocated to MCS Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009- 10 Type of activities promoted through CAL and other educational technologies and their effectiveness in terms of children's learning enhancement: From last year’s budget, State provided computers in tribal residential hostels because students in these hostels get more time & opportunities for computer usage. Only Dhamtari district distributed computers in day schools because of the study being done by APF in Kunid, Dhamtari in 60 schools. This year also, districts aims to supply computers in rest of the tribal hostels. Following activities will be undertaken for improving CAL activities: . 1. Supply of computers in tribal hostels- Districts will procure computers as per Govt, procedure. Each hostel will have five set of computers with internet facility along with a set of educational CDs. 2. Training of teachers to use CAL- Tribal department is running the scheme of computer education in tribal hostels. Last year, these hostel’s wardens were given 5-5 days training by INTEL. This year, these hostels’ teachers will be given training for computer aided learning. Funds for these training will be pooled from the teachers’ training. District Computer training centres will be used for the venue of these training. 3. Upgradation of old computers- computers with old versions will be upgraded to have proper use of such computers. 4. Mapping of CDs with the textbooks- all available CDs will be mapped with textbooks & classrooms. Teachers will be informed about the CDs which they can use while taking regular classes & teaching different subjects. 5. Maintenance of computers- all the computers will have their annual maintenance contract for regular usage. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 101 6. Regular availability of CDs- Central Institute of Education Technology (CIET), IGNOU, Vigyan Prasar, Azim Premji Foundation will be requested to provide different CDs for regular usage in these schools. 7. Monitoring and Program Evaluation- APF has trained a team of Resource Persons who have a better understanding of the fusion of technology with pedagogy. These trained RPs will be assigned the task of doing regular monitoring & providing regular technical support to these schools. Once in every quarter, state level field evaluation to ensure regular use of computers in schools, identification of learning difficulties, to understand the measures for improvement, documentation of good practices & impact assessment will be undertaken. These activities will be undertaken from REMS fimds. 8. Infrastructure and resource support- Tribal department will be providing furniture and other required infrastructure support like electric connection for computers etc. in these hostels. 9. Support in CAL activities- Following institutions will be tapped for providing support in CAL activities: 1. Nature of research and action research: As per the Plans, following studies are in final stage & reports will be submitted to the state by the end of March: Organization Topic Aide et “How teachers handle classes after getting training to deal with Action Children with special needs ” l^andi ''Effectiveness of teachers ’ training in classrooms ” Foundation Society for “Case studies o f the villages in the contexts o f achieving UEE" Social Service Sutra “An Evaluative Study o f various schemes for girls ’ education & their Consultancy effectiveness ” Datamation “Use o f tribal folk materials and its impact in classrooms ” Emerging issues and studies to be undertalien in 2009 -10; State has received approval from Executive Committee for six studies. Details of the studies approved are as follows: Name Sutra Consultancy Topic Problems in classroom management (academic) and problems in school management (administrative) Sample 4 blocks 25 panchayats 2 schools in each from Bilaspur/ Durg/Sarguja/ Bastar 60% PS & 40% UPS Budget Rs. 4,98,600/- Outputs Material development on classroom management agreed Training to teachers - RPs support & provision of modules Video-graphy of best classroom practices as per ADEPTS basics Name Xidas Topic Study of student’s attendance patterns and strategies for improving attendance Sample 4 districts with 4 complete block coverage total about 400 schools Budget Rs. 4.61 lacs/- Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 102 Outputs Identification of areas with low-attendance and efforts to improve attendance agreed Sharing of various measures to improve attendance and orientation to concerned officials Suggesting system to track student’s attendance through software Name Gyanodaya Association Topic Identification and management of the education of children with autism in primary schools of one block Sample 3 blocks of Surguja with full coverage Budget Rs. 4.49 lacs/- Outputs Material development for teachers/ parents agreed Teachers training on skill developinent-identification and education Parent counseling & lEC Meeting/ orientation of CACs/BEO/ BRCC/DEO/ DPCs Documentation/Video graphy of some individual cases Name Sankalp Topic A study on sanitation and hygiene in primary and upper primary schools with strategies for improvements Sample 4 districts with 20 block coverage total about 800 schools Budget Rs. 4.25 lacs/- Outputs Developing training modules/ lEC materials agreed Training of Resource Persons/ Video clips for training School-wise reports to be submitted Name DatamatloiL Topic Assessment of present system of remedial “teaching/ coaching classes and developing suitable strategies for improvement of the same Sample 4 blocks of Mahasamund & Dhamtari Math & Science at Upper Primary level Budget Rs. 3.50 lacs/- Outputs Identification of best practices & coordination for exposure visits agreed Suggesting different models for remedial teaching Developing modules/ resource materials for organizing remedial teaching Monitoring mechanism to ensure remedial teaching in schools Name Ankur Topic Identification and management of the education of children with dyslexia in primary schools of one block Sample All blocks of Korba district Budget Approx. 4.90 lacs. Being revised as per the suggestion from the committee Outputs Instead of 2 blocks, all blocks of Korba district agreed Developing manual and designing 7 to 8 days teachers training Support to Residential bridge course centres arranged by SSA for such children Showcasing and demonstration to other districts Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 As per the proposals received from SIEMAT, following activities will be requested for Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan; Appraisal ReportX^hhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 103 Activity Establishment of professional teachers councU of Chhattisgarh Objectives Developing a teachers directory at the state level Names o f the teachers expert in different areas will he put on website This will act as a pool to identify teachers for specific job requirements Extension of Hunar Khoj with details of practical use & teacher motivation Budget Rs. 0.50 lacs Activity Impact study of current ICT programs (CAL) being implemented in the state Objectives • To document the impact o f CAL program in the state • To assess the program and ensure regular usage in classroom • To monitor the program & implement in classrooms on a regular basis • To suggest & provide different CDs/ materials for CAL schools Budget Rs. 0.75 lacs Activity Analysis of School results Objectives • To develop a system/software to analyze school results • To identify schools performing below desired criteria • To provide the list of such schools to DIETs with proper reasons Activity Training need assessment Objectives • To develop tools/ design for teachers ’ training need assessment • To document district-wise/ class-wise/ subject-wise training needs & suggest the trainers about the identified issues & include them in teachers ’ training • To suggest some training materials for the training needs identified for districts Budget Rs. 1.50 lacs Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 After the approval of the Plan, detailed proposals will be invited and work will get started jointly at the earliest. Observation: It is good to note that the State has planned for series of research studies in 2009 - 10. The Appraisal Team appreciates these studies. At the same time it would like to insist on the following studies to be undertaken in 2009 - 10. They are non- negotiable and the State must commission these studies to some reputed institutions and share the findings with the Ministry in a stipulated time. The studies include the following. 1. Time - on - task study on students and teachers Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 104 2. Study on attendance rates of students and teachers The studies must be undertaken at the earliest. PAB may like to set deadlines for the same. 3. Academic support systems a. Academic support through BRCs, CRCs and DIETs ■ Block Resource Centers: The following table throws light on the status of Block Resource Centers. Information about Block Resource Centers BRC mtgs. CRC/ % Total no. BRCs BRCs BRPs BRPs held in School visits Effectivenes of blocks sanctioned functional sanctioned recruited 2008-09 in 2008-09 s of BRCs Twice every 146 146~ 146 438 438 10 100% month Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Major role and functions of BRCCs and BRPs: Building BRC into a resource centre where books, discussion papers etc are available. Training of teachers and various SSA functionaries Developing teaching-learning materials Visits to schools & monthly meetings (observation & feedback) Planning, organizing, co-ordination & administrative role Planning & organizing training programmes, workshops, review meetings, monthly meetings at BRC Collaborating & coordinating with BEO & DIET. Preparing AWPB & training calendar etc. Providing support to activities undertaken at cluster level. Planning environment-building activities. Coordinating with DPO. Monitoring of CRC activities. Collecting reports of various meetings & submitting to DPO. Feedback from teachers through school visits. Attending review meetings. Supervision of civil works. Nature of activities and academic contributions of BRCs in 2008-09: 1. Organizing training at Block level 2. Organizing Parent-teacher meeting 3. Timely distribution of textbooks/ reading materials Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 105 4. Enrolment drive, efforts for retention of students 5. Implementing ADEPTS standards Emerging issues, strategies, and activities in 2009-10: Activity Calendar of BRC Activity Month Venue Teachers training April to October BRC/ Hostels Shishu Vachan April to June ECCE Monitoring of SSA activities/ April to March Whole Block Implementation Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 --10 Cluster Resource Center (CRC): Information about Cluster Resource Centers Total no. CRCCs CRCCs CRC mtgs. % CRCs CRCs School visits of sanctio in held in Effectiveness sanctioned functional in 2008-09 clusters ned position 2008-09 of CRCs Twice per 2169 2169 2169 2169 2169 12 school per 100% month Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Major role and functions of CRCCs and CRPs: • Visiting of every primary school & AIE to monitor the classroom processes at least twice in a month. • Observation of classroom transactions to enable Synchronization with imparted training to the teacher. • Observing student’s notebooks to ensure that the work has been done properly, checked by teachers & mistakes are regularly rectified by the teachers. • Monitoring of quarterly examinations in every school of the cluster, analysis of results, and discussion of results in PTA / VEC meetings. • Discussions on difficulties faced by teachers & provide on the job guidance. • Review of the teacher’s diary. • Making agenda for the monthly meetings based on the teachers’ diary. • Presenting & sharing the achievement, problems & difficulties of the whole cluster in the monthly meeting at the Block resource Centre. • Devoting one full day in a school during the visit. • Filling, compilation and analysis of academic monitoring formats Nature of activities and academic contributions of CRCs in 2008-09: 1. Organizing different training programmes 2. Academic monitoring of schools 3. Timely distribution of materials/ books Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 106 Emerging issues, strategies, and activities in 2009-10: Activity Month Venue Teachers training April to October BRC/Hostels Shishu Vachan April to Jime ECCE Monitoring of SSA activities/ Implementation April to March Whole Block Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Capacity Building for BRC/ CRC Personnel: The following table indicates the type of training programmes undertaken for the BRCs and CRCs during 2008-09, and proposals for 2009-10. Training of BRC/ CRC personnel Target Group Training in 200St-09 Training in 2009-10 Duration Focus areas Duration Focus areas BRCC 10 days Content/ admn. 10 days Management, management monitoring BRPs 10 days Content 10 days Subject focused CRCC 10 days Content,^ 10 days Subject focused monitoring Source: AWP & B, SSA, a bhattisgarh 2009 -1- 0 Overall physical progress and targets for BRC/CRCs Items Target for 2008-09 Achievement % of achievement Target for 2009-10 Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial BRCs 146 - v.f ' . , . 146 100% 146 CRCs 2169 2169 100% 2169 Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Recommendation: Keeping in view the good performance of BRCs and CRCs in 2008 - 09 the Appraisal Teams recommends the proposal of the State for PAB approval. Information about Urban Resource Centers: Not proposed - Information about DIETs: Nature of academic support extended by DIETs in 2008-09: District Institute of Education & training were established as an apex body in the field of Basic Education at the district level and has been assigned to fulfill the following objectives: ■ To make sincere efforts in regards to enroll the children of age group 6-14 those who are identified through a special programme of SSA.. ■ To increase achievement level of the students and to develop the core competencies among the children covered under S.S.A. programmes. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 107 ■ To prepare master trainers / resource persons to guide and train the teachers who are working in primary and upper primary schools. ■ To monitor and perform various activities with f different functionaries like B.R.C7 C.R.C /District coordinators regarding elementay education to obtain a desired result. ■ DIET through its mentors keep a watch on the quality of teaching and the ongoing training programmes which take place at DIET as well as BRC/CRC level. ■ More emphasis to promote girls’ education through NPEGEL/ Meena manch and other adequate schemes of woman sensitization like Woman Motivators Group. ■ Sincere efforts are being made ensure maximum utility of T.L.M. (Teacher learning material) with a view to have an effective teaching process in the school education. ■ A careful watch in regard to access/ retention/ minimizing dropouts is being kept at diet level through its mentors. ■ To conduct various educational research to develop better understanding of teaching learning process, school managements and problems related to schooling. Issues, Strategies, and Activities in 2009-10: • Training of Resource Persons, teachers; • Material development and school monitoring • Conducting field evaluation studies & small scale research activities b. Resource Groups & Subject Expert Forums Academic Resource Groups: The State has attempted to strengthen its academic resource groups at different levels. The following table indicates the structure of these resource groups and their major activities. Information about Resource Groups at different levels SNo. Resource Whether Number of Number of 3 Key activities - Groups constituted members per meetings undertaken (RGs) (Y es/N o) Resource Group held this year 1. State Yes SRG for 4 Planning for Resource Four SRGs • Teacher trg. teachers training Group (SRG) • DEP-SSA 0 Plarming for DE • Curriculum 4 Activities renewal & Curriculum renewal Textbook dev. & textbook dev. • Research 2 Support in Research activities 2. District Yes DRG for Conducted Resource Thirty Two @ • Teacher Training teachers’ training Groups two per district • Research (DRGs) 3. Block BAG for Organized training Resource • Teacher Training of Primary School Groups Teachers (BRGs) Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 108 SNo. Resource W hether Number of Number of 3 Key activities Groups constituted members per meetings undertaken (RGs) (Y es/N o) Resource Group held this year 4. Cluster Not formed Planning to form Resource this year for subject Groups specific activities & (CRGs) sharing of skills Source: AWP & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Strategies and activities for 2009-10: • Training of teachers, Resource Persons • Material development/ selection on materials • Monitoring of schools/ field c. Nature of convergence & collaboration among different academic institutions BRCs and CRCs are to provide academic support to teachers. While there is a BRC in every block, there are several Cluster Resource Centres (CRCs) within a block, each covering a small number of schools within easy reach, so that they can remain in close contact with the teachers of the schools within their jurisdiction. The BRCs and CRCs are expected" to function as vital centres for organizing in-service teacher training, and providing on-site support to teachers in schools and for helping in community mobilization. BRCs are headed by Block Resource Centre Co-ordinators and CRCs by Cluster Resource Centre Co-ordinators. THe BRC Co-ordinator is academic co-ordinator / facilitator at block level responsible for in-service training of teachers and providing guidance to the CRC Co-ordinators. They collect material from the District Project Office for distribution among the teachers through CRCs and provide continuous support to the schools while monitoring the implementation of pedagogical-and other interventions at school level. The tasks of CRC co-ordinators include providing constant support to the teachers, monitoring their performance, identifying their needs both in formal schools and ahemative education centres and liaising with the VECs, the community and NGOs working in the area of education. Monthly meetings at cluster level are held and periodic visits to schools by CRC Coordinator are made to monitor teachers’ performance and to provide them on -site support. As BRCs and CRCs have been playing significant role in improvement of the quality of elementary education, it is important to get a feedback on their effectiveness in providing the required academic support to teachers and in supervision of elementary schools. d. Performance tracking indicators for CRCs, BRCs, DIETs, etc. against set learning goals This year, state is planning to develop EDI for ranking the performance at various levels. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 109 e. Public Private Partnerships (PPP) for quality improvement (their nature and effectiveness) • UNICEF is providing resoiirce support in the form of payments of different organizations who provide training, procurement of training materials and different kits • EDC has provided various CDs, training of project staff on management & teachers to use different CDs • IKTEL has provided training to teachers on CAL & provided computers in selected Ashram & hostels • State also collaborates with Pratham, Room to Read for strengthening the reading development prgramme. 4. Quality management for quality assurance: a. Nature of Quality monitoring in the State State has developed the online academic monitoring mechanism to collect & compile the results. Results are given in detail in AWP. Teachers are also provided Reflective Teachers diary to reflect their day to day practice. RIE, Bhopal is also monitoring the SSA activities in schools. b. Findings of Quality Monitoring Tools (nature of issues and how.they have been addressed) STLF I-(a): Curriculum Revlsioii and TLMs ■ It is stated in the report that curriculum revision is being done in the State of Chhattisgarh on the basis of NCF. Though pedagogical issues are being given due consideration but details regarding the adoption/adaptation of NCF-2005 may kindly be provided. ■ The steps undertaken by the SPO, Chhattisgarh for textbooks development like organization of workshops and seminars; involvement of community, NGOs, faculty from universities and teachers at various stages of the textbooks development is noted with appreciation. The textbooks are being developed in three languages viz. Urdu, Hindi and English. However, SPO is facing a number of problems in development and distribution of the textbooks. As mentioned in the report, only 70 per cent schools received textbooks within 15 days of commencement of academic session. This aspect needs to be streamHned by involving all the stakeholders. Efforts may be made to ensure that cent per cent schools received the textbooks within 15 days of commencement of new academic session. ■ Workbooks and Supplementary materials like 'Bachpan' and 'Baalmitra' are being given to students. Various handbooks and teaching manuals for primary and upper primary levels are also being provided to teachers like Pahal, Inclusive Education, Parakh etc. Further, NCERT’s Source Books on Assessment may also be of great significance in this regard. ■ It is stated that almost 100 per cent primary and upper primary teachers have been given the TLM Grants and the equal number of teachers have utilized the same. For providing training on the development of TLMs, efforts are made during the in-service programmes conducted at cluster level. Self instructional modules prepared by SCERT on the^levelopment of TLMs have been provided to teachers as well. ■ The candid statement on the extent of use of TLMs in the classrooms is noted with appreciation. It is reported that only 30 per cent teachers are using TLMs on a regular basis. Rest o f the teachers are not using TLMs in the classrooms. It is also shared that TLMs, by Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 110 and large, are out of the reach of ‘students and are practically meant for inspection/supervision undertaken by CRCCs/BRCCs. SPO may like to ensure that TLMs are being used appropriately and effectively by all the teachers to make learning more interesting and joyful for the students. They may also be encouraged to develop TLMs with the help of students with locally available materials to ensure their active participation in the teaching-learning process. Organizing a state-level workshop on effective use of TLMs is a welcome step. ■ SPO has given a detailed account of training initiatives taken to develop training materials/modules for primary and upper primary level functionaries on some very relevant areas. Follow-up activities are also being undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of these training modules. These efforts may be continued for the sustainability and future growth. • It is reported that in some districts, coordination between DIETs and DPOs is quite good but in some other districts the coordination between them is found to be missing. DIETs may be involved in providing in-service training as well as in the process of implementation of Quality Monitoring Formats (QMFs). DIETs may play a vital role in highlighting strengths and weaknesses besides airanging for appropriate pedagogical interventions and remedial measures. ■ For the effective monitoring, it is quite pertinent to evaluate performance of BRCCs and CRCCs on the basis of QMFs filled at various levels. It is appreciated that SPO is taking the aspect of monitoring very seriously and also taking stem actions against those whose performance was not up to the mark. It is quite an exemplary step for maintaining good standards of education. SPO has also identified 10 BRCCs and 10 CRCCs whose performance has been good. Att the CRCCs should visit the schools under their jurisdiction regularly and provide academic leadership to them and community at large. Feedback should also be provided at various levels by SSA functionaries and they should ensure that these feedbacks are being used for amelioration of quality, thereafter. ■ It is mentioned that a number of action research projects have been undertaken in the year 2007-08 by DIET and SCERT faculty and findings are also being disseminated to the grassroot level ftmctionaries for bringing about improvement in classroom processes in the form of a Journal. It is praiseworthy that for the wider dissemination of findings and innovative features, SPO is planning to organise a Seminar. Moreover, teachers may also be encouraged to undertake action research projects for dealing with the problems of routine nature in a more systematic and scientific way. ■ It is reiterated that quality elementary education with the help of community participation in a decentralized manner is one of the thrust areas of SSA. The onus of encouraging the same is on SPO and it is good to note that SPO Chhattisgarh has concrete plans (e.g. involvement of Jan-Bhagidari Samitis in various school activities, training for JVS members, etc.) for the districts that have had 'moderate' and 'indifferent' community participation. However, the following steps may also be undertaken: - Awareness campaigns for community leaders and members - Keeping a watch on the performance of the schools for the effective functioning - Sharing the information on various developmental aspects with parents including the progress of children Various resource groups and monitoring teams may also be constituted for greater participation, better coordination and effective monitoring. ■ The average attendance rate (80-95 per cent) of various social groups of students in the State is not quite satisfactory. SPO may ascertain various reasons for the low attendance rate and Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 111 check this problem by strengthening the system of local monitoring and organizing community awareness programmes. Retention of children in all the elementary classes should be sustained through making teaching-Ieaming process more interesting and joyful. It is hoped that measures adopted by SPO like Saheli Shala, KGBV, active role o f JVS members etc. will contribute in augmenting the attendance rate, consequently, the overall performance of the students. ■ State efforts initiated towards quality improvement in elementary education like Read Chhattisgarh, Interactive Radio Programmes for English, Science, Mathematics, Computer fo r Girls in Model Cluster Schools, formation of Resource Group for Teaching through Technology etc. are appreciated. SPO may analyse/evaluate the impact of these innovative steps on the performance of the students and share the same with NCERT. ■ The key problems identified by the SPO like students and teachers absenteeism, lack of proper monitoring and feedback mechanism reflects that SSA functionaries, more specifically, BRCCs and CRCCs need orientation training, which may be organized in a cascade manner. SPO may initiate dialogue with the NCERT if the latter’s support is required. Observations on STLF-I (b): In-service Teacher Training ■ In-service training equips teachers with the latest teaching techniques, participatory classroom processes and assessment procedures. It is good to note that various agencies viz. CGBSE, EDC, SCERT, IGNOU etc. have been involved in organizing in-service training programmes for teachers. ■ Various techniques have been adopted for assessing-training needs like questionnaires, classroom observation, focused group discussion, etc. The follow-up of in-service training is also being done by SCERT & DIETs faculty, BRCs and CACs. It is observed that the outputs of these progranmies are not as expected. SPO may like to ascertain various reasons for the same and may take corrective measures/actions, subsequently. ■ SPO Chhattisgarh has four SRGs for providing specialized academic resource/support in the area of textbooks development, teachers training, distance education and SSA. All SRGs are providing requisite inputs to State except SRG of SSA. It is mentioned that no meeting has been conducted so far for the SRG of SSA. It may please be ensured that meetings are conducted regularly and issues of effective monitoring are dealt with on continuous basis. For effective monitoring and close collaboration, various resource groups at district, block and cluster levels may also be constituted. Observations on STLF-II: Learners’ Assessment ■ After comparing the data of previous report (November, 2006) with the current data (July, 2008) the following points have been emerged, which need to be taken into consideration. ■ The report reveals that there is no significant difference in the performance of boys and Girls. Similarly, there is no significant difference in the achievement levels of students in Hindi and Mathematics. It is noted that the performance of SC and ST students in Mathematics has improved in some classes. ■ The report also shows that 31-44 per cent students in Hindi and 32-41 per cent in Mathematics are in D and E Grades i.e. securing less than 50 per cent marks. In most of the cases, the performance of students has been declined drastically in both Hindi and Mathematics over a period of one and‘a half years. The SPO may conduct discussions with the teachers and the parents of such students and try to ascertain and analyse the probable reasons for this decline in the achievement levels.______Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 112 The range of deteriorated achievement level is 1-24 per cent from the last report. For instance, the comparison of achievement data of CWSNs of Class II in Hindi shows decline of 24 per cent (16-40 per cent). It is really an area of serious concern and needs immediate attention. SPO may identify the low achieving schools and special efforts may be undertaken for augmenting the achievement levels of students of these schools. Measures like diagnostic tests, remedial teaching, on-site guidance to teachers etc. may be undertaken in this regard. It is noticed that percentage of boys and girls are not calculated as required. The learners’ achievement of boys and girls should be calculated from the total population of students (sample copy of filled-in Learners’ Assessment Format is enclosed). So, it is requested that this calculation system should be followed in future reports, which will help in maintaining uniformity across the country. c. Nature of Performance Indicators for teachers and trainers for 2009 - 10: As per the Plans, the State has planned to go for ADEPTS II indicators for School, CRC & BRCs. The broad indicators identified till date during the discussions with teachers and SSA officials are: Major performance Major performance Major performance indicators identified indicators identified for CRC indicators identified for BRC for School teachers Personnel 2009-10 Personnel 2009-10 2009-10 Newspapers in all One visit per school with Visit of 10 clusters every schools & related comprehensive quality month activities monitoring & immediate remedial actions Neat & clean classrooms Complete understanding of the Complete understanding of the & space for each child to factors affecting the UEE factors affecting the UEE sit & perform activities targets & achievements targets & achievements Provision of garden in Recognizing best teachers of Recognizing best CACs/ schools with students clusters on the basis of their Teachers of clusters on the support performance & putting their basis of their performance & names in Hunar Khoj website putting their names in Hunar Khoj website Attendance level Able to suggest strategies to Increasing time on task N indicators improve teachers time on task learning opportunity time in & students learning classrooms opportunities Activities during Able to design & perform Can identify the need of the assembly various need-based training block an act accordingly Science experiments in Implementation of Cluster Developing & implementation classes Improvement plans of block Improvement plans Educational tours of Monitoring of various Monitoring of various children activities & implementation of activities & implementation of quality related inputs quality related inputs Closer linkages with Regular students evaluation Regular students evaluation Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 113 Major performance Major performance Major performance indicators identified indicators identified for CRC indicators identified for BRC for School teachers Personnel 2009-10 Personnel 2009-10 2009-10 community during school visits during school visits Developing selected schools as Developing selected schools as model schools in cluster model schools in block & some clusters as model clusters Do some innovations at cluster Do some innovations at block level level Source; AW? & B, SSA, Chhattisgarh 2009 - 10 Observation: It is a matter of surprise that the Plans have not discussed about the progress of Performance Indicators under ADEPTS. In the quarterly national Workshops of Pedagogy Unit, TSG the State Teams have reported use of Performance Indicators and publication of booklets and training manuals on ADEPTS. The Appraisal Team would request the PAB to urge the State authorities to count the progress of Teacher & Trainer Performance on a quarterly basis and report to Ministry regularly. This is a non - negotiable for 2009 - 10. Overall Quality Initiatives in the State: The State has planned for following innovative quality improvement initiatives. 1. Hand writing Improvement Training (HIT):_State has organized training of Master - Trainers from each block for improving the hand writing. Selected teachers are given seven days training and have become the nodal persons to implement hand writing improvement strategies. The expert team has also trained the students of selected KGBV & hostels for hand writing improvement. These children were given 20 days training to improve their hand writing. Pre & post results were maintained for each training. Training of teachers at cluster levels were organized to pay proper attention for improved hand writing. 2. Improving teaching of English through different approaches: State is running interactive radio instruction program for English learning. Apart from this popular program, this year, state is trying the following: Take off Program in English with ILFS/ UNICEF support in KGB Vs English Improvement in four blocks with ELTI-SCERT intervention Spoken English with Pratham support in Mahasamund & four districts of Raipur Correspondence program with Pratham/ Cambridge University support Science Experiments in schools: After getting the guidance during Kerala Pedagogy Coordinators meet, state is seeking support of recommended experts in popularizing low-cost easily doable science experiments in schools. Four districts have been covered under this program and teachers trained are giving further training and developing their own models in their contexts. 8. Developing Reading Cards: State has organized two workshops to develop reading cards in relation with the ongoing textbooks. These cards will give supplementary reading materials to have a better understanding of text materials. These cards will also be useful for those who have recently learned to read. Now they will use these cards as Read to Learn. These cards are developed for all primary schools. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 114 9. Hostel warden training: Chhattisgarh being a tribal state. Ashram Shalas and hostels are prevalent in most of the places and cover large number of children get education through these hostels. This year, for the first time in the state, hostel wardens are given five days training to provide quality inputs in tribal hostels. 10. Subject-specific training: This year, teachers are given subject-specific training to teach students in an effective manner. Various pedagogical inputs like mind-mapping, multiple- intelligence, constructivist approach, active-ieaming etc. were introduced and teachers were given practice in developing lesson plans. 11. Providing maximum time for teaching: This year, state has planned to provide maximum time to teachers for actual classroom teaching reducing the non-teaching tasks. Maximum part of training is provided during summer vacation and month of April was devoted for teaching reading and reinforcement purposes. Shishuvachan program was organized in all anganhadis to improve the basic study skills in those students who are ready to join class one. Monthly meeting at clusters and most of the training part is given during holidays. Broad recommendations for Quality improvement Basing on the above discussion the Appraisal Team reconmiends the following activities related to overall quality improvement under SSA. Recommendation for activities related to quality: SNo. Interventions Proposed Recommended Remarks Physical Financial Physical Financial (Rs. in (Rs. in lakh) lakh) 1. Teacher recruitment New Teachers Salary (P.S.) 2 1.400 2 1.400 2 teachers - 1 PS New Teachers Salary 1194 979.080 1194 979.080 3 Trs. each for (UPS) 398 PS to UPS Addl. Teachers against 380 266.000 380 266.000 Upgraded Gyan PTR Jyoti trs. Recurring 54985 49434.456 54985 49434.456 As per norms 2. Training a. In service (PS+UPS) 126121 1891.815 126121 1891.815 As per norms b. Induction training 12276 368.286 12276 368.286 As per norms Training of untrained 8217 493.020 8217 493.020 As per norms A teachers Training of BRC, CRC 2315 11.575 2315 11.575 As per norms Personnel 5. Free Textbooks (PS) 2425721 2317.236 2425721 @ Rs. 97 per child (a) (b) Free Textbooks (UPS) 943046 1964.323 943046 @ Rs. 208 per ch. Sub Total 3368767 4281.560 6. TLM Grant (P) 83546 417.730 83546 417.730 As per actual (a) (b) TLM Grmt (UP) 50792 253.960 50792 253.960 As per actual Sub Total 134338 671.690 134338 671.690 7. School Grant (P) 32837 1641.850 32837 1641.850 As per actual Appraisal Rqjort Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 115 SNo. Intei ventions Proposed Recommended Remarks Physical Financial Physical Financial (Rs. in (Rs. in lakh) lakh) (a) School Grant (UP) 13192 923.440 13192 923.440 As per actual Sub Total 46029 2565.290 46029 2565.290 Remedial teaching 198678 @ Rs.200 per 8. 199371 398.742 ch’d 9. TLE Grant (P) 1 0.200 0.200 As per actual (a) TLE Grant (UP) 398 199.00 398 199.00 As per actual (c) UPS not covered under 0 0 Not applicable OBB Sub Total 399 199.200 399 199.200 10. LEP 18 23320.00 18 dists. As per norms 11. BRCs 146 737.096 146 737.096 As per actual 12. CRCs 2169 164.844 2169 164.844 As per actual (IV) SIEMAT SSA mission has provided Rs. three crore budget earmarked for SIEMAT to SCERT. The building of SIEMAT is constructed by State Housing Board Society in the premises of DIET campus. The building is inaugurated and has started functioning from the year 2007-08. Presently the same building is being used by SIEMAT, SCERT and ELTI. A separate hostel is also constructed to accommodate participants for training and meetings in the same premises. The main activities carried out by SIEMAT are: 1. Training of Higher Secondary School principals in 2 phases 2. Developing School Education Policy 3._ Development of Human Resource Management Plan of School Education Department 4. Induction training of DIET staff 5. Coordination of European Commission activities 6. EstabHshment of EMIS 7. Orientation on educational leadership 8. Development of Graded Reading Materials (V)IED Initially, the State was very weak in the area of Inclusive Education (IE). Past since two years the State has taken up some activities on inclusive education like assessment camps, appointment of resource teachers, providing aids and appliances to CWSN etc. The overall progress and the expenditure on IE was an area of concern till 2007-08. But the State has improved the implementation of the IE programme in the past two years, which has also led to the overall improvement in the expenditure trend too. Progress on IE in 2008-09: The progress below as reported by the State in the national IE workshop held in February 2009: • Only 193 CWSN are being provided home based education Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 116 • 30 resource teachers have been appointed • 612(>% CWSN provided with aids and appliances • Only 29.40% teachers given special training on IE. Only 528 teachers trained through 90 day training • 18489 schools (40.11 %) have been made barrier-free • 15 NGOs have been involved in the IE programme The State is also using 16 DDRCs and NGOs registered under the National Trust In the year 2008-09, the state identified 41672 CWSN and the total budget provided in the state was Rs. 500.01 lakh. The physical and financial progress of the state is given below; The State has identified 41672 CWSN, which is 0.88% of the total child population (4724021). District- wise coverage is shown below. The State has covered 414 CWSN through RBCs, 130 through HBE and 41128 through regular schools. District wise Progress on IE: T3 50 T3 -o A O O Z. Sm TJ o « « -a .2 c/5 a -2 -s § ‘S -o o ^ a o <4-1 U © S o o | | | . 0 o « £ Im I ft o w • 2 a o — . ^ «*-c OJ o o > « o » % 1 . 1 Z a « fl u E z 2 d cu H Z 1 Baster 1753 1709 40 4 197 1 3 2135 51.896 2 Bijapur 318 318 0 0 27 0 0 12 0.010 3 Bilaspur 3532 3494 20 18 425 0 6 2210 59.090 4 Dantewada 999 994 0 5 74 0 2 232 13.400 5 Dhamtari 1435 1620 20 25 99 0 1 333 24.576 6 Durg 5964 1417 18 0 277 0 4 964 28.000 7 Janjgir- 1665 5924 40 0 73 0 4 943 39.145 champa 8 Jashpur 1956 1916 40 0 142 0 0 232 6.000 9 Kabirdham 1961 2356 20 5 101 0 0 1241 82,450 10 Kanker 2381 1938 23 0 205 1 1 375 0.174 11 Korba 1046 1016 20 10 68 2 2 524 25.57 12 Korea 1395 1395 0 0 130 0 0 553 0.391 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 117 13 Mahasamund 3312 3287 25 ^ 0 60 0 0 1197 65.000 14 Narayanpur 73 73 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 15 Raigarh 3536 3502 24 10 203 2 2 1679 55.92 16 Raipur 4110 4054 26 30 1452 3 6 2001 42.710 17 Rajnandgaon 2728 2663 50 15 60 3 1 1405 45.87 18 Surguja 3508 3452 48 8 353 3 2 2556 41.41 Total 41672 41128 414 130 3997 15 34 18592 40.92 Financial Progress on IE: 2008-09 Activities Phy. Financial Expenditure % Exp. Assessment Camp (per block) 146 21.900 20.6730 94.397 Minor surgeries 146 14.60 22.9464 157.167 Provision of aids and appliances 8000 160.00 31.7770 19.861 Awareness community mobilization (per 14.6000 100.000 146 14.60 block) RBC for CWSN, including vocational 29.1064 72.763 415 40.00 training .Workshop for development of training 9.0000 100.000 18 9.000 material Support from>5GO/Specia\ Schools for TLM 10.0000 100.000 10 10.00 & training 1.65000 100.000 Braille Book/Text Book on Tape/CD/ Large 330 1.65 Print Book Observation of disabled day (per block) 146 14.600 14.60000 100.000 10 days Training on Sign Language (for deaf 18.0000 100.000 1800 18.00 & dumb, 100 from each district) 10 days Training on Braille (30 teachers per 5.7600 100.000 540 5.760 district) 5 days IE Training (per district 100 teachers) 1800 9.00 9.0000 100.000 90 days foundation course (30 teachers per 10.9994 67.897 540 16.200 district) Barrier free access 1260 63.00 94.8600 150.571 TLM and reading material at block “ 146 7.30 7.30000 100.000 Mobile Resource Advisor Salary 54 45.90 26.98020 58.780 Expanding special Olympic movement for 18.000000 100.000 MR CWSN & Sports/ Cultural activities (per 18 18.00 child) District and block level workshop/ 9.0000 100.000 18 9.00 seminar/meeting Transportation Allowance per blind child 350 ^.50 3.5000 100.000 Exposure visits and Educational tour 18 18.00 18.0000 100.000 Sub Total 500.01 375.752 75.149% Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 118 It can be inferred from the above table that the actual expenditure on some of the activities in IE is low. The state has certainly shown improvement from 39.18% to 75.14% in expenditure. The State expects to show an expenditure of 98.(X)% by March 2009. Expenditure of Chattisgarh in IE since 2005-06 Year Outlay Exp % Exp 2005-06 316.35 lakh 123.94 lakh 39.18% 2006-07 321.42 lakh 0.00 lakh 0.00 % 2007-08 192.6 lakh 180.09 lakh 93.50 % 2008-09 500.01 lakh 375.7524 lakh - 75.14% as on Jan 2009 Number of CWSN Identified in 2009-10: The State has identified 46153 CWSN (shown below), out of a total child population of 4622215, which is 0.9985% of the total child population. SNo. Category Number of CWSN 1 Visually Impaired 5920 2 Hearing Impaired 7093 3 Mentally Retarded 5261 4 Orthopedically Handicapped 20980 5 Learning Disability 1530 6 Multiple Disabilities 1727 7 . Cerebral Palsy 875 8 Others 2767 Total 46153 District - Wise Coverage Plan of CWSN SNo. District Name No. of CWSN % CWSN No. of CWSN No. of CWSN No. of CWSN Identified against child enrolled in Proposed to Proposed to pop Schools cover through cover through EGS/ AIE HBE 1 Bastar 1755 0.66 1723 20 12 2 Bijapur 961 1 949 0 12 Bilaspur 4280 0.88 4160 20 100 ^ 4 Dantewada 1852 1.38 1840 0 12 5 Dhamtari 1445 0.887 1425 10 10 6 Durg 6102 1.15 6057 20 25 7 Janjgir-Champa 1665 0.518 1653 0 12 8 Jaspur 1967 1.6 1912 43 12 9 Kabirdham 1961 1.17 1932 29 0 10 Kanker 2381 1.7 2356 20 5 11 Korba 1089 0.49 1059 20 10 12 Korea 1524 0.0117 1517 0 7 13 Mahasamund 3409 1.19 3264 100 45 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 119 14 Narayanpur 153 0.62 153 0 0 15 Raigarh 3536 1.53 3444 50 42 16 Raipur 4725 0.6 4517 75 133 17 Rajnandgaon 2728 0.97 2698 30 0 18 Surguja 4620 0.81 4510 100 10 Total 46153 0.9985 45169 537 447 The focus of this year on IE would be on the foDowing: • Appointment of mobile resource teachers • Conduct of assessment camps • Providing aids and appiliances • Braille books • Minor corrective surgeries • RBCs for CWSN • Awareness programmes • Teacher training • Provision of ramps • Workshops/meetings • Special Olympics • Support from special schools/NGOs Class-wise Break up of BraiHe Books Required Class Braille Books Required I 120 II 98 III 86 IV 66 V 64 VI 43 VII 24' vm 16 Total 517 Plan for 2009-10 SNo. Activities Phy. Unit cost Fiff. Time 1 Functional and formal 145 0.20 29.0000 September & assessment October 2009 2 Corrective Surgery 259 0.120 31.0800 November & December 2009 3 Provision of aids and 3936 0.010 39.362 November & appliances December 2009 4 Aids and appliances 144 0 050 7.2000 November & distribution camp (per block) December 2009 5 Identification of CWSN 133 0.100 13.3000 July - October, 2009 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 120 6 Vocational Training for 712 0.026 18.5120 May 2009 CWSN (20 Days) 7 R.B.C. for CWSN @ Rs. 8000 537 0.080 42.9600 April - per child December, 2009 8 Support from NGOs/Special 15 1.50 22.50 April - June School for TLM & Training 2009 9 Braille kit and MR kit for VI June, 2009 & MR CWSN a. Braille kit / books for VI 517 0.01 5.17 June, 2009 CWSN b. MR kit for MR CWSN 369 0.060 22.1400 June, 2009 10 1- day Training to Parents of 34173 0.001 34.1730 June, 2009 CWSN 11 Community 125 0.100 12.5000 December, 2009 awareness/celebration of world disabled Day (per block) 12 Teacher Training a. 10 days training on Sign 1450 0.015 21.7500 June, 2009 language (for deaf & dumb) b. 10 days training on Braille (per 403 0.015 - 6.0450 June, 2009 teacher) c. 5 days IE training (per block 130 0.150 19.5000 May, 2009 40 teacher) d. 90 days foundation course (per 340 0.035 11.9000 May 2009 - teacher) March, 2010 13 Barrier free access (Ramp, 1080 0.070 75.6000 May - June, Handrail and Toilet 2009 modification per school) - 14 TLM and reading material For 131 0.080 10.4800 July - August, CWSN 2009 15 Mobile" Resource Advisor 82 0.720 59.0400 All year Salary 16 Special Olympic Movement 35548 0.001 35.5480 September - for CWSN & Sports October, 2009 17 District 14 1.00 14.00 June - workshop/seminar/meeting September, 2009 18 Transport Allowance per blind 410 0.001 4.10 All year child for 10 months @ Rs. 100/- 19 Escort Allowance child for 10 897 0.001 8.97 All year months @ Rs. 100/- 20 Exposure visit & educational 18 0.50 9.00 December 2009 tour -January 2010 Sub Total 553.83 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 121 The state had proposed B. Ed. (Special Education) and Diploma in the special Education of VI or HI or MR. It is also recommended that the State conducts these through convergence with other State schemes. Such long term courses are not allowed imder SSA, especially at this stage of the programme. Recommendation: As the State has shown good progress in the area of IE, Rs. 1200/- per disabled child is recommended. Hence a total of Rs. 553.83 lakh is recommended on the condition that the State: ® Strengthens its identification mechanism as CWSN constituted 1.00% of the total child population • Provide Braille books by June 2009 (VI) Innovative Activities a. Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) Progress in 2008-09: The State was allocated an amount of Rs. 223.016 lakh for 18 districts in 2008-09 for carrying out activities under ECCE and the State incurred an expenditure of Rs. 223.016 lakh (100% expenditure of the outlay approved). SNo. District No. of centres No. of children covered tiU 2008-09 Boys Girls Totar 1 Bastar 1477 28432 23263 51695 2 Bijapur 557 9803 8021 17824 3 Bilaspur 1643 33435 27356 60791 4 Danewada 1100 13915 11385- 25300 5 Dhamtari 400 6448 5952 12400 6 Durg 2200 38148 36652 74800 7 Janjgir-Champa 1270 25146 20574 45720 8 Jashpur 1258 26893 22003 48896 9 Kanker 35 568 447 1015 10 Kawardha 946 14568 11920 26488 11 Korba 1389 22391 20668 43059 12 Korea 1088 19149 15667 34816 13 Mahasamund 1266 16306 12812 29118 14 Narayanpur 151 1827 1495 3322 15 Raigarh 1251 20642 16888 37530 16 Raipur 2357 42897 39598 82495 17 Rajnandgaon 1483 23980 24959 48939 18 Surguja 3048 60350 49378 109728 Total 22919 404898 349038 753936 Appraisal Report Ckhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 122 Activities carried under ECCE during 2008-09: (Rs. in lakb) SNo. Activity Budget Expenditure 1 Training to Anganwadi workers 138.195 138.195 2 Learning Kit For Activity Center 82.508 82.508 3 Contextual Learning Material for tribal pre 02.313 02.313 school children in 9 dialects. Total 223.016 223.016 Proposal for 2009-10: District No. of Anganwadi No. of centres for Kit centres developed by SCERT Bastar 1189 80 Bijapur 557 210 Bilaspur 2107 16 Dantewada 1632 78 Dhamtari 896 176 2792 19 Janjgir Champa 1542 70 Jasbpur 1945 38 Kanicer 1427 98 Kawardha 892 177 Korba 1380 120 Korea 1263 131 Mahasamund 1478 110 Narayanpiir 151 268 Raigarb 2126 11 Raipur 2357 Rajnandgaon 1704 54 Siirguja 3000 0 Total 28114 1660 Activities: 1. Activity Kit for selected Anganbadi centres Activity kits bave been developed by SCERT @ Rs 5000 per AWC for holistic pre school activities by the children. 2. Shishu Vachan Karyakram Last year, State organized the Shishu Vachan program in coordination with Women & Child Welfare Department and Pratbam. This year the State has proposed this programme to provide learning kit to all the ECCE centres to prepare 4-5 yr and 5-6 yr old children for school in the month of May, training to anganwadi workers in the first week of April and onsite monitoring support to ECCE centres under this programme. The main objectives of this programme are: Children of 4 to 5 yrs. Children of 5 to 6 yrs The child should be able to read any The child should be able to read Language simple paragraph with any simple paragraph comprehension Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 123 • Recognition of 1 to 20 numbers Recognition of 1 to 50 numbers and Maths • Simple addition and subtraction simple addition and subtraction in through objects numbers Writing Alphabet writing Word and simple sentence writing Detailed financial Breakup: (Rs. in lakh) SNo. Activity Phy, Unit Cost Fin. 1 Learning kit 28114 0.0025 71.095 2 - Training of Anganwadi Workers (2 28114 0.0041226 115.905 days) 8 3 ECCE Kit developed by SCERT 1660 0.05 83.000 Total 270.00 Recommendation: Statens proposal is recommended for approval b. Girl’s Education Progress during 2008-09: The State was allocated an amount of Rs. 260.038 lakh for 18 districts in 2008-09 for carrying out activities under Girls’ education and the State incurred an expenditure of Rs. 260.038 lakh (100% expenditure of the outlay approved). (Rs. in lakh) Physical Total Budget Anticipated Number Sanctioned for achievement up to SNo. Activity (No. of 2008-09 March 2009 Girls to be covered) Phy Fin Phy Fin 1. Meena Kit 2940 42 1.008 42 1.008 2. Award to Children at District 21 21 0.42 21 0.42 Level 3. Excursion Trip 550 11 3.33 11 3.33 4. Kala Jatha Programme 4800 13 5.20 13 5.20 5. Summer Camp for girls 25200 09 12.60 09 12.60 6. Vocational Training 950 950 1.90 950 1.90 7. Accelerated Learning Camp 6075 135 9.18 135 9.18 8. Documentation Activity 2200 02 1.00 02 1.00 9. Balika Mela 21500 217 10.85 217 10.85 10. Special Coaching to girls 25160 629 61.29 629 61.29 11. Girls Children for Change 116340 1939 58.17 1939 58.17 12. Strengthening of girls TW 2774 2774 95.09 2774 95.09 department Ashramshala Total 260,038 - 260.038 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 124 Proposal for 2009-10: For 2009-10, the State has proposed to take up following activities under Girls’ education for all the 18 districts- Physical SNo. Activity Number Unit Cost Financial (No. of Girls) 1. Educational Kit 111360 0.00175 194.88 2. Educational Tour 2550 0.00600 15.30 3. Summer Camp 30000 0.00050 15.00 4. Special Facility to Hostel 4(i) Water Purification Machine 20.20 11450 - 4(ii) Television 12.00 Strengthening of girls TW 5. 255 0.04500 11.47 department Ashramshala 6. Balika Mela 2400 0.00048 1.15 Total 270,00 Recommendation: The appraisal team recommends the State’s proposal to take up activities related to Girls’ Education. c. SC/ST: Elementary education is a priority area in the Tribal sub-plans from the 5th Five Year Plan. Education of ST children is considered important, not only because of the Constitutional obligation but also as a crucial input for total development of tribal communities. Keeping this view, the state has conducted various interventions to cover the SC/ST children under Innovation during 2008-09. District wise Progress against SC/ST Innovation activities during 2008—09 Financial (2008-09) Physical (2008-09) "O ^ ^ o WD fls O a & & 5 H 2 o a iZJ s 5 € 1 Bastar 15.000 15.000 15.000 Special coaching in In 895 schools, Special coaching for 2- Bijapur 14.980 14.980 14.980 895 schools SC/ST Children is given 3 Bilaspur 14.950 14.950 14.950 4 Dantewada 14.990 14.000 14.990 Community black Commmiity blackboard is provided to 5 Dhamtari 14.950 14.950 14.950 board to 10 Villages 10 villages 6 Durg 12.920 12.920 12.920 7 Janjgir Champa 14.750 14.750 14.750 Edu. Material Educational Material development in 8 Jashpur 15.010 14.800 15.010 Development in 19 local dialect is developed in 19 Tribal 9 Kanker 14.600 14.600 14.600 blocks blocks 10 Kawardha 14.700 14.700 14.700 11 Korba 15.000 15.000 15.000 Vocational In 30 schools vocational training is Training in 30 imparted during vacations 12 Korea 15.000 15.000 15.000 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 125 13 Mahasamund 14.010 8.190 14.010 schools 14 Narayanpur 14.050 14.050 14.050 Accelerated Learning camps are 15 Raigarh 14.770 9.830 14.770 Accelerated organized with coverage of 815 16 Raipur 11.710 11.710 11.710 Learning camps children 17 Rajnandgaon 14.700 14.700 14.700 in 30 schools 18 Surguja 14.950 14.950 14.950 Activity based learning is provided in Total 261.040 249.080 261.040 Activity based 30 schools learning in 30 schools Archery Training is given in the 16 centre of 160 schools with coverage Archery Training of 600 children. in the 16 centre Establislunent of Bal panchayat in 90 Establishment of schools with Naandi foundation Bal panchayat in 90 schools Science math club in 180 UPS, 5 Sub schools for urban deprived Science math club children in Durg District in 180 UPS, 5 Sub schools for 2967 seat increase in existing 114 urban deprived TWD Ashrams children Increase 2967 seat in TWD Ashrams The state has achieved the 95% financial target till Jan. 2009-10. By the end of March 2009, the state is committing for 100% achievements. Major issues in universalizing the primary education in SC/ST context; • Scattered population & not fulfilling the norms for opening Upper Primary schools • Unawareness among the SC/ST children • Lack of effective monitoring & teacher absenteeism • Naxalite problems in remote areas Approach to MLE: major initiatives in the State: State has started the innovative teaching for tribal children imder Multi-lingual Education program. Through different workshops & seminars, there is a consensus among educationists that there should be the use of mother tongue in the classes especially in the initial one or two years. So instead of treating it as a complete package of Multi-lingual Education, state is trying to orient the teachers working in tribal areas with the methodology of MLE & exposure to various innovative ideas for developing different teaching aids so that it support & facilitate the teaching-learning process in the classrooms and limiting this upto class one and two only. State started the work in the area of Multi-lingual Education just after getting exposure of this in Mysore hitemational Workshop. Ed.CIL supported the state in introducing various experts in this area & supporting for organizing different workshops. Following activities were organized under this: • State level Orientation program in Raipur, Raigarh, Bastar, Jashpur & all other tribal districts for orientation and material development • Participation in national Tribal Workshop in Delhi Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 126 • Finalizing the plan for MLE in nine districts with piloting in 10-10 schools • Ed.CIL & experts suggested by Ed.CIL are supporting the state • Scaling of the program & support through an external agency for implementation in schools Exposure to material development was given by the experts and after the first orientation, nine districts nominated the tribal coordinators in their respective districts to look after these activities. They were oriented & their capacity was built to organize such activities. These coordinators fiirther developed their own teams & started working to develop different materials for classes one & two. The district team identified 10-10 schools in their district to pilot this project. Each language group was asked to develop the following types of materials for teaching: • Web-themes based on issues related to local surroundings • Big books based on local stories with detailed illustrations • Small books for self-reading • Listening stories for children • Alphabet Chart • Alphabet books • Poems, stories & Riddles • Language games State is trying to focus the capacity building area of the key stakeholders. The tribal teachers, tribal coordinators, material developers, monitors etc. were given training on the issues related to material development and teaching through various innovative metliods. They were sent to Orissa to see the material development process. Following districts are developing the material in the anguages given in front: SNo. District Tribal dialect 1 Dantewara Gondi (Mariya) 2 Bastar Halbi, Bhatri 3 Kanker Gondi 4 Dhamtari Kamar 5 Korba Birhor 6 Jashpur Sadri 7 Sarguja Surgujiya 8 Raigarh kudukh 9 Koriya Surgujiya The teachers working in MLE group were exposed to various innovative teaching techniques. They were given various ideas on how to make students learn the basic skills in reading, writing and arithmetic. The same is useftil for other students as well. Next year, state will ftirther scale up these programmes & develop the materials during teachers training & materials will be printed from the district material development head. SCERT will lead the whole process and they have planned for socio-linguistic survey, teachers training and material development related activities. SCERT has also planned to work out strategies for Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 127 developing materials in other tribal languages as well. District have trained RPS among teachers and some external RPs with linguistics background whose services could be taken to implement this program. District wise Activities proposed during 2009-1 } under SC/ST Innovation Strengthening Special facilities Educational Sports Uniform for Boys Archery Educational Kit ofTWD to hostels as per Tour Kit in Ashram Shalas training Ashrams requirements District o ^ s •si G ® s c o m B o a = 1 c a "S 6 ® b b s d S - d o Z « - E S H IIcc ^l lc« Z z Vj Bastar 10 3 0 0 2695 6.74 2436 4.26 0 0 10 i 0 0 15 Bijapur 0 0 0 0 655 1.64 4207 7.36 0 0 24 6 0 0 15 Bilaspur 0 0 0 0 1325 3.31 4907 8.59 0 0 31 3.1 0 0 15 Dantewada 0 0 0 0 624 1.56 4252 7.44 0 0 24 6 0 0 15 Dhamtari 2 0.6 0 0 100 0.25 6943 12.15 0 0 10 1 1 1 15 Durg 0 0 0 0 70 0.18 5900 10.3 100 4.5 0 0 0 0 15 Janjgir Champa 2 0.6 0 0 469 1.17 3587 6.28 110 4.95 20 2 0 0 15 Jashpur 0 0 10 1 1025 2.56 1022 1.79 170 7.65 20 2 0 0 15 Kanker 2 0.6 _ 0 0 240 0.6 5457 9.55 50 2.25 20 2 0 0 15 Kawardha 1 0.3 0 0 0 6383 11.17 34 1.53 10 1 1 1 15 Korba 0 0 0 0 260 0.65 6486 11.35 0 0 30 3 0 0 15 Korea 5 1.5 0 0 455 \.\A 3^64 6.16 0 0 16 1.6 4 4 - 15 Mahasamund - 0 0 0 0 70 0.18 7100 12.43 0 0 24 2.4 0 0 15 Narayanpur 10 3 0 0 1929 4.82 3530 6.18 0 0 10 1 0 0 15 Raigarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 1800 3.15 250 11.25 6 0.6 0 0 15 Raipur 0 0 0 0 345 0.86 6364 l l .l 0 0 30 3 0 0 15 Rajnandgaon 3 0.9 0 0 210 0.53 7529 13.18 0 0 4 0.4 0 0 15 Surguja 0 0 0 0 2994 7.49 2209 3.87 30 1.35 23 2.3 0 0 15 Total 35 11 10 1 13466 33.67 83976 146.9 744 33.48 312 38.4 6 6 270 Financial breakup of Innovative activities for 2009- 201( Total proposed Activities Targets Unit cost amount Sports Kit 10 (No. of Ashrams) 0.1 1 Uniform for Boys in Ashram Shalas 13466 (No. of Students) 0.0025 33.67 Educational Kit 83976 (No. of Students) 0.00175 146.96 Strengthening of TWD Ashrams 744 (No. of Seats) 0.045 33.48 Special facilities to hostels as per requirements 312 (No. of Ashrams) 0.1 38.4 Educational tour 35 Blocks 0.3 10.50 Archery Training 6 schools 6 6 Total 270.01 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 128 Proposal for 2009-10: Educational Trips: Selected number of SC/ST children from each district will be to given opportunity to visit to nearby educationally important places to expose them of the developments of the outer world. They will be given an opportunity to see different places explained in their textbooks and have a better direct experience of local contextual materials given in their social science and other subjects. Districts will make the list of such places mentioned in their textbooks and make a plan for the visit of such places during vacation. Outcomes expected: • To develop & improve the self-esteem of SC/ST children • To provide opportunities for direct experiential learning situation • To make the learning enjoyable and develop different social skills Educational kit for SC/ST children Districts have proposed educational kits to be supplied to SC/ST students during educational drive. These kits will be provided to meet the hidden cost of education. Generally parents have to bear the cost of additional pair of uniforms, shoes, tie, belt, school bags, compass etc. State, in an effort to meet out the hidden cost of education to some extent will provide these materials in the form of educational kit for SC/ST students continuing their education. Outcomes expected: • To meet out the hidden cost o f education • To develop & improve the selfesteem of girls • To provide educational materials for quality education purpose Archery Training Centers It has been reported in various studies that tribal children are socially endowed with skills like hunting, fishing etc. In order to promote the inherent talents. Archery training centers would be established in selected sports complexes and tribal hostels of the state. This scheme would attract children towards school, help in retention along with promotion of talent. Outcomes expected: • To provide education in their cultural contexts • To develop traditional skills in archery & leam new techniques & proficiency • To promote sports activities in schools Special facilities to hostels as per requirements The state representative informed that mostly the tribal & SC children get their education through residential hostels and this is the only lull secured means to continue their education without being drop outs. As these children spend most of the time in these hostels & get their education, there is a need to improve the facilities of these hostels. As a demand from our Tribal Welfare Department and the wardens as well as students residing in these hostels, some special facilities are provisioned in these hostels to improve the conditions like water purifiers. Some of such hostels are in remote areas so they have demanded for a TV Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 129 with Dish connection to see various educational programmes and also get exposed to the language to remove the language barrier in their classrooms. Outcomes expected: • More time on task for students residing in hostels • More clean and hygienic environment for students • Exposed to the correct language skills and knowledge o f surroundings Strengthening of TWD Ashrams/ hostels Last year, state has started the work of strengthening of tribal hostel to accommodate the additional strength of students who were ready to continue and get mainstream education after completing the Residential Bridge Courses. State was able to increase the seats in hostels and get many of the children get accommodated in tribal hostels. Last year, many disabled children also got admitted in such hostels to get inclusive education. This year as well, the same program of strengthening of tribal hostels will continue and as a support grant, these hostels will get funds @ Rs. 4500/- for per seat increase. This fund will be used for the procurement of additional bed, bed-sheets, mattresses, utensils and other charges as per requirement. This year also, many OOSC as well as disabled children will get admission in such hostels. “ Outcomes expected: - • Setting up situations/ infrastructure for inclusive education • Accommodation o f additional children in these hostels • Reduction in the number of OOSC and improved retention Monitoring Mechanism: • At block level. All BRC/CRG will monitor the activities in each month. • At district level, the District project coordinator and Assistant project coordinator will monitor each month • The district mission leader/ District project director/CEO district Panchayat, monitor the activities casually. • At state level, casually monitoring by state project coordinator and Assistant project coordinator. Recommendation: The State's proposal is recommended for approval d. Computer Aided Learning Progress during 2008-09: a. Physical Progress- • No. of schools/centres covered during 2008-09 : 383 new schools/ centres* • No. of beneficiaries under CAL : 35500 fresh students * 323 Residential Tribal Schools run by Tribal Welfare Deptt. * 60 Primary Schools in Dhamtari district under Azim Premji Foundation supported CAL impact Research Study Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 130 b. Financial Progress - PAB Approval Achievement Achievement As on 31” Jan 09 830.00 780.00 93% *Anticipated expenditure by 31*‘ March 09 - 830 lakh c. Activities in 2008-09 (Row 1 to 4 Fresh Activities, Row 5 Recurring Activities) SNo. Activities Details Achievement Phy Fin 1. Infrastructure • IT Infrastructure (PC, • Five Multimedia Desktop 2283 780.00 Printers, IT Computers with UPS and one peripherals) printer to each of the 323 Residential Schools and Ten multimedia Desktop computers with UPS and one printer to each of 60 primary schools in Dhamtari district through DGS&D rate contract/ CSIDC • Supply of Muhimedia desktop 50.00* computers with UPS & printer through DGS&D rate contract/ CSIDC Provided Non IT Infrastructure Room, teacher, furniture and other by (Ceiling, Flooring, infrastructure Tribal Electrification, Welfare Earthing etc.) Deptt. 2. Teacher Training under Five days teacher training for all Met CAL teachers from hostels/ashram from shala in collaboration of INTEL teacher Continuous Teacher Training training process under Dhamtari district project in collaboration of Azim Premji Foundation ______3. Content/ Software Eighty CDs from the following Met Development sources have been replicated & from provided to all schools covered LEP under CAL in the state: funds • Azim Premji Foundation • Education Development Centre • ILFS based on textbooks • Vigyan Prasar - cRTt ^tcTT (Science) ______Total 780,00 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 131 Proposal for 2009-10: a. Physical- • No. of schools/centres to be covered during 2009-10 : 423 new Tribal Welfare Deptt. Ashram Shalas/ Residential UP Schools & selected Govt. Upper Primary Schools No. of beneficiaries to be covered under CAL : 40000 fresh students b. Detailed Activity Wise break up for 2009-10 - (Row 1 to 4 Fresh Activities, Row 5 Recurring Activities) SNo. Activities Details Proposal Phy Fin 1. Infrastructure • IT Infi-astructure (PC, Printers, IT Computers @ Rs. 35,000/- 2191 766.85 peripherals) • Non IT Infrastructure (Ceiling, Operating Software/ antivirus 2191 109.55 Flooring, Electrification, Earthing @ Rs. 5000/- etc.) 2. Teacher Training under CAL All training through INTEL Nil Nil support 3. Content/ Software Development All CDs will be taken by Cost of different organizations like copying EDC, APF, Delhi Caltoons, from Vigyan Prasar, CIET, IGNOU LEP & other organizations funds 4. Recurring Activities AMC of old computers in 12 23.60 • Maintenance districts at the DPO level Total 900.00 Time Frame Activity April 2009 School site visit to see the minimum requirements May Basic Infrastructure setup by TWD at schools June • Procurement of Computers • Provide content materials • Teacher Training- July Start of CAL activity after CAL resources are in place at schools August Use by students continues September Verification by SPO October - November Mid Term Reviews Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 132 Observation on the progress: 1. During 2008-09, the State extended the CAL facility to 383 tribal residential hostels in convergence with the TRW dept., Chhatishgarh another 60 primary day schools in Dhamtari district, in collaboration of APF, undertaken as a CAL impact research study. 2. 323 hostel wardens of all tribal residential schools have been provided with five days training programme in collaboration of Intel. Similarly a continuous Teacher Training programme is going on involving school teachers of CAL schools in the Dhamtari district in collaboration of APF. 3. Also state level a team of state resource persons have been provided with master trainers training who would be involved in regular monitoring & provide technical support to these schools. These resource persons will do quarterly evaluation to ensure effective use of computers in schools, identification of learning difficulties & measures of improvement, documentation of best practices & impact assessment. 4. The state has also provided educational content CDs on English, Science, Mathematics & Social Science (80 CDs) to all CAL schools procured/ availed fi’om Azim Premji Foundation, Education Development Centre, ILFS based on textbooks, Vigyan Prasar - ^tcTT ^(Science) In state proposals 2009-10, the state has proposed to expand Computer Aided Learning programme further to 423 new Tribal Welfare Deptt. Ashram Shalas/ Residential UP Schools & selected Govt. Upper Primary Scliools. The broad activities to be covered as proposed by the state are as follows, 1. Procure & provide 2116 systems to newly undertaken CAL schools costing 740.00 lacs. 2. Procure operating system software & Antivirus software for the system. 3. AMC for old machines in 12 districts at the DPO level for maintenance of the systems..., Recommendation: The appraisal team recommends the proposal of the state on expanding CAL to new schools limiting "the unit cost of the systems to Rs.0.3 lakh. Regarding the procurement of operating system software & antivirus software the state should go for economy & may consider use of the free operating systems/ antivirus software available. e. Urban Deprived Children Progress during 2008-09: The State was allocated an amount of Rs. 110 lakh for 18 districts in 2008-09 for carrying out activities under Girls’ education and the State incurred an expenditure of Rs. 110 lakh (100% expenditure of the outlay approved). Activities: • 17 Night Shelters were in operation before 2008-09 where 850 working and urban deprived children were tracked for mainstreaming, out of which 36 children passed the Class 8*** board exam and 77 children could clear the primary school board exam in Class 5. • 19 Night Shelters opened diuing 2008-09: Raipur (3), Bilaspur (2), Durg (2), Raigarh (2), Janjhgir (2), Mahasamund (1), Bastar (1), Dhamtari (1), Korba (3), Rajnandgaon (1), and Sarguja (1) to cater to the need of 1004 out of school children. • 48 NRBCs in Dhamtari, Durg, and Kawardha districts of Chhattisgarh, covered 494 children Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Page 133 • Support to Juvenile Home: Under the Kishor Nyaya Adhiniyam, 8 Observation homes run by Social Welfare department taking care of 50 children were assisted by support grant of Rs. 4 lakh with 50 thousand per centre. ______(Rs. in lakh) Physical (No. Total Budget Anticipated Physical of Out of Sanctioned for achievement up to SNo. Activity (Centre School 2008-09 March 2009 Number) Children) Phy Fin Phy Fin New Night 19 1004 19 91.30 19 91.30 Shelter Evening School 48 494 48 14.70 48 14.70 (NRBC)______Support to 400 4.00 4.00 Juvenile Home Total 75 1898 75 110.00 75 110.00 Proposal for 2009-10: • 17 new night shelters will be opened in urban areas • 330 cycles will be provided to girls attending night shelters • Children will be provided free textbooks and other educational materials to continue their education. • Children will be supported by organizing regular coaching classes. • Counselling services will be made available to these children. • Support from training institutions: Nearby B.Ed. colleges will- be requested to support these centres by arranging lesson plans by trainees, support through their counselling and guidance section, case studies of each child, recording of baseline and improvement in achievements. • 36 night shelters (15- 2006-07, 2- 2007-08 and 19- 2008-09) that were being supported imder the Urban deprived Children component of Innovations will be fiinded under AIE scheme. Activity New Night Shelters Cycles for girls Total budget (^.Rs. 4.81 lakh Rs. 2500 Physical 17 330 18 Financial 81.77 6.23 90.00 Recommendation: State’s proposal is recommendedfor approval (VII) Girls Education a. National Programme for Education of Girls at Elementary Level (NPEGEL) NPEGEL programme is being implemented in 74 EBBs of 1059 clusters of 14 Districts. Physical Progress during 2008-09: The State has covered 74 EBBs in 14 districts is covered as per revised norms and an amount of Rs. 562.20 lakh was sanctioned for recurring activities. Achieving 100% NER among girls, without dropout is a major objective of NPEGEL activities in EBBs. Hence, specific strategies Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 134 like computer aided learning, tailoring, innovative mathematics training and mushroom cultivation training was given to girls for improving their retention level. (Rs. in lakh) No. of No. of girls Financial SNo. Activities Unit Cost MCS covered Achievement 1 Recurring Grant for MCS 836 0.20 4,92100 167.243 2 Award to Schools / Teachers 792 0.05 792 Teachers 39.50 3 Student Evaluation 811 0.20 241250 133.485 4 Learning through open school 390 0.15 4900 43.828 5 Management Cost 499 -- 11.199 738250 girls Total 395.255 covered Financia] Progress: (Rs. in lakhs) % of Expenditure Out lay Total Fund % of Expenditure Year Expenditure against Total Fund approved Available against Outlay Approved Available 2003-04 610.860 153.330 0.00 0% 0% 2004-05 3479.330 1587.110 1980.908 56.93% 124.81% 2005-06 1338.710 1613.350 1123.495 83.92% 69.64% 2006-07 1740.960 706.360 810.251 46:54% 114.71% 2007-08 1313.356 1065.340 1244.377 94.75% 116.81% 2008-09 720.63 630.77 395.331 54.86% 62.61% Total 9203.846 5756.26 5554.362 60.35% 96.49% During the year 2008-09, the State was sanctioned a budget of Rs 720.63 lakh. The achievement is Rs. 395.331 lakh (54.86%), which is a low expenditure. Proposal for 2009-10: Total No. of Unit Financial SNo. Activities girls MCS Cost Proposal covered Recurring Grant for MCS 1 Stationary, Computer Maintenance, Sport material, in order to attract girls to attend the school which in turn shall promote girls education reduce drop out and uninvolved girls school prepare strategy for girls of irregular attendance monthly meeting teachers etc. Engagement of part time instructors Self Defense Training Aiming to facilitating holistic development of the school girls 1059 0.194 205.720 795000 self defense training and Marshal Art was conducted covering 2301 numbers of girls of upper aged group. Parents/guardians also expressed great satisfaction with the training. Vocational Training Vocational training for upper age group of girls organized in the MCS. Training like suing, stitching, Pot painting, games & sports, local folk dance and music etc was imparted to girls. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 135 Teachers Training State has proposed to organize gender sensitization training at 2 primary and upper primary level. Under the training issues 1012 0.04 40.480 810360 pertaining to gender basis while teaching language, Mathematics & Environment and Science etc. will be address. Award to Schools/ Teachers One award per year @ Rs. 5000/- (in kind) will be provide to a 3 school/teacher at cluster level for their contribution towards 1059 0.05 52.950 742000 learning achievement, enrolling girls, retention and learning outcomes of girls students. Learning through open schools 4 Girls UPS level requires some short terms residential training at 1059 0.1175 124.450 7500 regular intervals and examination fee will be provide. Sub Total -- 423.60 - 5 Student Evaluation 1 ) Training on Life Skill - The important and useful life skills related to girls will be provided like- (a) Accessing public services (b) Banking operation 1059 0.0735 77.890 53000 (c) Travels Activities (d) Related to Health and Hygiene (e) Training and Democratic procedures (f) Horticulture & Physical/ Sport Training 2) Promotion of girls - Keeping in view of all round development of girls training on life Skill development will be organized. Under this programme personality development, development 1059 0.0651 68.970 10299a of reasoning capacity, as well as adolescent health and challenges of girl child issue will be address. The target group of the programme was 11-14 years in school and also for Out of school children. 3) Special Coaching Classes- Special coaching will be organized for educationally girls form December up to the beginning of annual examinations. Remedial teaching will be 741 0.0539 39.970 150000 based on a careful diagnosis of hard spots in the concern subject. It aims to help them to overcome their weaknesses. 4 ) Summer/ Village Camp - In the district summer & winter vacation in the month of May, June & December village camps will be organized a group of girls chosen from MCS and organized in girls ashramshalas/ hostels. 651 0.0228 14.895 30000 It is very important to create awareness and interest towards education of girls. Girls shall visit the nearby village and find “out of school gu-ls” and encourage them to join the school and make them aware of health benefits. 5) Educational Tour - Exposure visits of girls to place like banks, industries, factories and other places where women work 403 0.0250 10.075 2000 at par with men falk with instill a sense of self confidence. Sub Total 1059 - 211.800 - 6 Additional Incentive (Uniforms, Stationary etc.) 1059 - 104.326 6(0 Primary 193196 6 (ii) . Upper Primary --- Sub Total 1059 - 104.326 - Grand Total 1059 - 739.726 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 136 The State has proposed an amount of Rs. 786.946 lakh for 1059 clusters and 74 blocks level activities for 2009-10 including Rs. 47.22 lakh for the management cost. b. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV) Under the scheme of KGBV, residential schools at upper primary level (Class VI to VIII) are set up for out of school girls predominantly belonging to SC, ST, OBC and minority communities in educationally backward blocks of the country. Status of KGBV No. of No. of No. of girls enrolled Model KGBVs KGBVs sanctioned operational SC ST OBC BPL Min Total I 89 89 1465 5106 1929 81 03 8584 II 04 04 36 96 54 4 - 190 1501 5202 1983 85 3 Total 93 93 8774 (17.11%) (59.29%) (22.60%) (0.97%) _ J0 0 3 ) _ Observations: • All the sanctioned 93 KGBVs are made operational. Out of it 89 are under Model I and 04 are Model D. Comprising 96.41% of the targeted enrollment. • All the KGBVs are running through SSA Society in the State. • Enrollment Status in having over 20% SC concentration blocks is 35% (SC girls) and ST concentration is 66% (ST girls), which seems to be encouraging. • Out of 93 KGBVs buildings only 38 are completed and 55 are under progress. - • 8 KGBVs (7 are Model-I and 1 is Model-II) are running in rented building. Financial Progress % of Expenditure - % of Expenditure Outlay Total Fund SNo. Year Expenditure against Outlay against Total Fund Approved Available Approved Available 1 2004-05 1133.488 1080.440 383.39 33.82% 35.48% 2 2005-06 0.00 697.050 425.05 - 60.98% 3 2006-07 0.00 1925.600 88.503 - 4.60% 4 2007-08 2034.78 2034.826 2034.826 100% 100% 1471.15 5 2008-09 2841.03 2446.55 51.78% 60.13% (up to Dec, 08) Total 6009.298 8184.466 4402.919 73.27% 53.80% The State has been able to come up with only 51.78% utilization, which is a low expenditure. Proposal for 2009-10: The State has mainly following Proposals; ■ The State has proposed Recurring grant of Rs. 2387.050 lakh for existing 93 KGBV including rent for 8 KGBVs amounting to Rs. 7.24 lakh. Appraisal Report Ckhattisgarh 2009 -10" Page 137 Recommendation for 2009-10: ■ The Appraisal Team recommended a total amount of Rs. 2350.26 lakh for 93 KGBVsi« Out of it, Rs. 2273.46 lakh for 89 KGBVs under Model-I and Rs. 76.80 lakh for 4 KGBVs under Model-II including rent for 8 KGBVs amounting to Rs. 7.23 lakh. Issues: Construction of KGBVs needs to speed up and State would complete all the in progress building by August, 2009. (VIII) Research, Evaluation^ Monitoring and Supervision: Progress during 2008-09: Rs. 599.209 Lakh was approved under REMS at a unit cost of Rs. 1300/- per school for 46093 schools. Expenses in this budget head is as follows: Budget approved Expenditure 599.209 lakh 419.723 Proposal for 2009-10: Under REMS, state has proposed an amount of Rs. 598.377 lakhs @ Rs. 1300/- per school for 46029 schools. le breakup of REMS proposed for 2009-10 is as follows: State level District level Proposed funds @Rs. 94.238 Per“ @ Rs. 1205.762 Per School School Research & Rs. 27.00 lakh Rs. 190 lakh Rs. 217.00 lakh Evaluation @ Rs. 58.658 per @ Rs. 412.783 per school school Monitoring & Rs. 16.377 lakh Rs. 365 lakh Rs. 381.77 lakh Supervision @ Rs. 35.579 per @ Rs. 792.978 per school school Total Rs. 43.377 lakh Rs. 555 lakh Rs. 598.77 lakh Details of REMS Activities: SNo. Activities Budget State Level Activities Research and Evaluation 1 Committed expenses for ongoing researches/ Studies by 20 SPO 2 Small field evaluation studies 7 'hv'O! , «*r -. > . ' 27 Monitoring and Supervision 1 Quality Monitoring Format 2.377 2 SSA magazine/ Print materials 10 3 DISE data collection and study 4 Sub-Total 16.377 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 138 District Level Activities Research and Evaluation Monitoring and Supervision Third party monitoring of Civil Works 365 SulhTotai S 6 S State REMS Total 43377 District REMS Total 555 Grand Total 598.377 Recommendation: Statens proposal is recommended for approval (IX) Strategies for Community Mobilization: Progress in 2008-09: PAB Approval (2008-09) Achievement Percentage % Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin 172114 103.27 139070 84.445 81.773% 80.801% The state has committed to finish the community trainings by 31®*March 2009. Major Activities Conducted During 2008-09 a. State has made certain amendments last year in the formation & structure of School level management committee. Every school will have the following three types of committees.Ecah committee has been clearly defined about their roles and responsibilities. Class-wise evaluation and Quality Development committee Parent-teacher Association School Management and Development Committee All schools organized two Parent Teacher Meetings from LEP ftmds. These meetings were arranged to demonstrate the school activities, discuss the ongoing activities, share the progress of students, school attendance and requirements of schools, see the performance of children and works done in their educational magazines- Bachpan & Balmitra. f. Community also supported schools in enrolment drives. They attended the Praveshotsav &identified school age going children, OOSC and tried their level best to get them enrolled in schools. g> Schools observed GUNVATTA AND NIRANTARTA UTSAV to bring the community more closer to schools and quality related issues. This progranmie aws being organized during the month of 0ctober2008 and January 2009. Each School was instructed to display the names of the members of Jan Bhagidari Vikas Samiti (JBVS) in school’s front wall along with the various funds received. Community was requested to monitor school activities like regular attendance of students and teachers, regular radio program, coaching and remedial classes, timely supply of textbooks and other materials etc. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 139 Proposal for 2009-10: Target 2009-10 Phy Fin 169278 101.566 Highlights of the community leaders training SchQol-based training Two days training in the gap of 15 to 20 days Use of Radio in training for information dissemination & monitoring Off air & on air sessions Message from Hon’ble ministers for quality initiatives Process: Orientation of block ftmctionaries directly by SPO & material distribution Print materials for lEC/ School-based activities First one day program to orient & brief about school-based planning & quality agenda Second one day after a gap to finalize the plan, review Rigorous monitoring by State/ District/ block & cluster Two way interaction of two hours through radio to review/ feedback & monitor the program Use of radio available in schools Data collection immediately after the second day training Compilation of data at block level Participants- School level committee/ Active & interested members o f the community Outcomes: Orientation on roles & responsibilities Field-data collection in a systematic way School-based planning for quality initiatives Systematic data collection Topics to be discussed: SSA & the related framework Roles & responsibilities of the committee Expectations from schools/ teachers & commimity Various grants/ funds available How to develop School based plan Data on School infrastructure/ resource mapping/ OOSC Various schemes like Remedial teaching/ coaching/ awards/ incentives/ RBC/ lED/ Radio Use of school/teacher/ maintenance grants How to ensure regular attendance of students/ teachers/ regular Parent Teacher meetings Quality maintenance in civil works related activities Major Activities planned for 2009-10: It is proposed that most of the trainings for community members in the state would be organized during the enrolment drives. Training programme will contain various strategies to obtain maximum participation from the community. It is reported that plan and strategies for proper Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 140 utilization of the services of various motivators at grass root level would also be brought into shape in consultation with the community during the trainings. The state has also emphasized in involving the community members for developing school improvement plans. The commimity trainings in the State is planned to be organized at the school level with proper guidance from the state. School will invite and involve community in different microplanning exercises. During the parents teacher meet school will invite the community and the parents thrice in a session along with the participation of JBS and PRIs to discuss the needs and achievements of the schools where parents will be able to know the achievement levels of their children’s. The state has also plan to orient the Jan Bhagidari committees on various standards decided under ADEPTS. The state has planned to transfer the budget for most of the School level activities directly to the school and the school will takeover all the activities based on certain guidelines from state and districts. To reduce the dropout rate and to increase the attendance of children in the schools the state has planned to involve the community members to play a crucial role in the process by making it mandatory that if a child in absent for five days continuously the JBS members will interact with the parents to know exact situation. Other Community Mobilization activities planned: • Enrolment drives • Regular parents teacher meetings • Class wise evaluation and quality development conmiittees meetings • School management and development committees meetings • School improvement plans • Display the name of Jan Bhagidari committee members of each school. • Display of various fimds received/ Number of teachers in place/ daily teacher’s movement/ Monthly teacher’s movement in the schools. • Formation of Jan Bhagidari committees in govt, aided schools. Observation: The state has not given enough coverage to the component in the plan. The state has planned to form Jan Bhagidari committees in the Government Aided schools and train them for better management of school. Though the state has planned number of activities the focus should be on quality development. There is a constant need to develop constant rapport by the state* and district educational functionaries so as to gain optimum participation from the community. Further the state should develq) an Implementation schedule of Activities to be conducted clearly mentioning the strategies for each activity and the outcome of the same. The state should focus more on the learning outcomes of the childrens.The state has formed class wise evaluation and quality development committees to look out the achievement level of the childrens which is a appreciable. Recommendation: State*s proposal is recommended for approval " • (X) Involvement of NGO - No GIAC meeting was held during 2008-09 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 141 Ta]ble: Status of NGO Involvement Functional Area No. of NGOs involved No. of NGOs likely to be during 2008-09 involved during 2009-10 1. AIE/AS interventions 8 04 2. Pedagogy 10 10 Total 18 14 (XI) Project Management As per the States plan 2009-10, at the State level out of 56 sanctioned posts 9 (16 %) are still vacant. At the DPO level out of 304 sanctioned posts 94 (31%) are vacant. The details of vacant positions are given in the following tables: SNo. Name of Post Sanctioned Working Vacant 1 Mission Director 1 1 0 2 Additional Mission Director 1 1 0 3 Finance Controller 1 1 0 4 Joint Director 1 1 0 5 Executive Engnieer 1 1 0 6 AssistanrEngineer 2 1 1 7 Assistant Director 4 4 0 8 Assistant Project Coordinator 8 8 0 9 Mis Incharge/ MIS Head 1 1 0 10 Programmwr 2 2 0 11 Dana Endty Operaor 4 2 2 12 Accountant 1 1 0 13 Cashier 1 1 0 14 Assisant Account Officer 1 1 0 15 Senior Grade 11 2 2 0 16 Senior Grade III 5 3 2 17 Steno 5 4 1 18 Drver 5 3 2 19 Peon 10 9 1 Total 56 47 9 Stains of District Level Staff as on 28th february 2009 SNo. Name of Post Sanctioned Working Vacant 1 District Project Coordinator 16 14 2 Assistant Project Coordinator 2 (Finance) 16 14 2 3 Programmer 16 14 2 4 Assistant Engineer (Civil) 32 19 13 Assistant Programme Coordinator 5 (Planning and Budget) 16 10 ' 6 6 Assistant Program Coordinator 16 12 4 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 142 (lED, Monitoring & Supervision) Assistant Project Coordinator (Reasearch, Evaluation and 7 Teachers Trainng) 16 9 7 8 Data Entry Operator 48 26 22 Assistant Project Coordinator 9 (Girls Education & Equity) 16 11 5 10 Accountant 16 12 4 11 Clerk Grade-II 16 8 8 12 Clerk Grade-Ill 32 21 11 13 Driver 16 13 3 14 PeonAVatchman 32 27 5 Total 304 210 94 If the above vacant positions are not filled up soon it will hamper the overall implementation. Therefore, it is recommended that the State should make the commitments on filling up the vacant positions as early as possible. a. District Project Office +DMIS (Rs. in lakh) Activity Physical Proposal Physical Recommended IEC(Janpaha\) IS 323.600 0 0.000 Workshop/Seminar 17 42.500 17 42.500 Media Activities 143 715.000 143 715.000 Computer 0 50.400 a 50.400 Fumiture 0 1.000 0 5.400 Material development for classes 1 & 2MGML 4292 343.360 0 0.000 Office contingencies (DPO) 18 255.000 18 255.000 Subtotal 1730.860 1068.300 DPO& M is Salary & Others Salary** 18 862.933 18 862.933 Vehicle hiring 358 71.500 358 j 71.500 POL 2 36.000 2 36.000 Maintenance 1 18.000 1 18.000 Professional fee (Audit fee) 17 17.000 17 17.000 Addl. TA/DA for BRPs 2609 156.540 2609 156.540 Subtotal 1161.973 1161.973 TOTAL 2892.833 2230.273 ** Details of Salary Additional Programme Coordinator 18 72.000 18 72.000 APC (Finance) 18 44.167 18 44.167 APC (Equity, Girls Education, NPEGEL) 18 44.167 18 44.167 Programmer 18 23.400 18 23.400 Assistant Program Coordinator 18 44.167 18 44.167 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 143 (Planning & Budget) Assistant Program Coordinator (Monitoring & Supervision) 18 44.167 18 44.167 Assistant Program Coordinator (Research & Evaluation) 18 44.167 18 44.167 Assistant Engineer (Civil) 35 95.333 35 95.333 Data Entry Operator 53 52.333 53 52.333 Data Entry Operator (1 Per block at collector rate) 144 69.120 144 69.120 Accountant 18 29.150 18 29.150 Clerk Grade-II 17 28.050 17 28.050 Clerk Grade-Ill 35 34.667 35 34.667 Accountant & Peon (Block level) 146 188.933 146 188.933 Driver 18 12.367 18 12.367 PeonAVatchman 35 24.267 35 24.267 Contingency Staff 35 12.480 35 12.480 Subtotal 662 862.933 662 862.933 b. State Project Office (Rs. in lakh) SNo. Details Proposal Recommended Remarks 1 Salary of Staff 96.855 96.855 Not coveied Mnder 2 Mobilization lEC 20.000 0.000 management cost 3 W orkshop/Seminar 31.000 31.000 4 Professional fee 35.000 35.000 Audit charges of internal 5 15.000 15.000 auditors / CA 6 Office Expenditure 60.000 60.000 7 Furniture, Equipment 7.000 7.000 8 MIS 10.000 10.000 Capacity Building, Workshop, 9 20.000 20.000 Orientation meetings etc. Not covered under 10 Resource Support firom Pratham 75.000 0.000 management cost 11 Hiring of Vehicles- 68.400 60.000 Restricted 12 POL 10.000 10.000 13 Documentation 50.000 50.000 14 Media activities 50.000 50.000 15 Magazines/Books 1.000 1.000 16 Child Tracking System 100.000 0.000 Under REMS 17 Study tour 20.000 20.000 TOTAL 669.255 465.855 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 144 5. Special Focus Districts: District Weakness Strategies Suggestions/Remarks Bijapur- SFD The ratio of PS to To provide assess, the In the plan the miss C, SFD D UPS is not district has proposed 11 match is found in the substantial which Residential Schools. proposed activities is 4:5. The district mention in the plan and has a gap of 234 The district has proposed in the costing sheet. UPS. for T.V & D.V.D with Tata Sky, educational Kit Though the plan has The district has and uniforms. For SC/ST indicated the strategies second highest i.e children studying in to cover OOSC but 14289 OOS which Ashram shala. extra efforts is needed is 20% of total to evolve the strategies OOSC in the state. The district also proposed as per child Similarly in social Archery Training, special circumstances for category wise, SC facilities such as drinking effective coverage. OOSC are 1447 & water facilities etc. in the ST OOSC are 60 hostels. The plan does not 10305. reflect on For the coverage of mainstreaming and The strength of OOSC, the district has child tracking Muslim OOSC are proposed, RJ3C in Pota strategies. 76. cabin, Ashram shala & in Madarsa to cover 8870 Moreover the district Due to naxalite children. Night shelter to should also need to affected area, the cover 50 urban deprived ensure the quality in most of the children. 1063 children the AIE centres. children are will be directly enrolled. deprived on taking/continue The district has not their education in proposed any activities for the regular schools 4306 OOSC due to which lead high Naxalites activities. drop out rate & low transition rate. The tribal people living here not aware of the developments taking place in the field of education and technology. In the Ashramshala, Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 145 SPECIAL FOCUS DISTRICT^ BUDGET ALLOCATION -200e'10 (ChhatUtgarh) eivll\IVork.ff'••til' ■ •wSchooU------TMCh«rs..------No.of OSC chlltfrtn - Covsrad ...... iindvr G«nd«r Gap 8CHE0UL SCHEOUL MucUm PS UPS Ratio ACR «bov« 10% ED EO PMO'a 121 Concantr Naxaina Nm AddHHMMl No. of ToMIUianeWoulhyofSSA NPEGELTotal No.otKOeV SI.No Namt orth« dlttrlcU >3:1 GAP>9000 A Oo8C> at Prl.& 20% TRIBES CASTES Minority atlon Afftetad Bordar Aroa NmLP NfwUP tMStl. TmolMr FraaTtxt DtobiM (DISE 2007^8) •bov« 20,000* at UP (ME (2«% and (2S%and CHstrtcts (20% and DIttrtott Dlatrlcta bulMIng(Inc. bulMIngOne. ACR EOSPS to PS UPS ludMraferiww AgaUui training (In Booka CMIdnn ESS RBC NRBC OUwr, ExcludingNPEOEL AUocallon(Fin.) (Fln.| 0749) ateva) abeva) abova) mo laaa) Mkeol* •nrolnwirt•xccu Mtvlo*) covarod CatMorv A florvC Cat 1 Bastar 1 1 1 1 0 142 200 0 0 142 426 0 ' 8206 241531 1755 0 6683 570 0 7561.002 117.178 306.840 2 BIJapur 1 1 0 0 100 0 0 • 0 0 60 2168 32690 961 0 8870 0 0 2590.230 35.330 127.350 3 Bllatpur 1 0 0 607 0 0 0 0 0 13451 339110 4280 0 470 1723 0 7365.558 122.060 248.280 4 Oantawada 1 1 1 0 0 275 0 1 0 0 0 100 3938 82901 1852 0 10007 0 0 5155.194 66.951 178.290 S Jashpur 1 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 4340 130091 1967 0 958 0 0 3256.311 20.935 76.410 « Kanker 1 1 0 33 150 0 ^ 0 33 99 0 5676 110164 2381 0 502 397 0 3314.477 0.000 25.470 7 Korba 1 1 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 5806 190032 1089 0 1833 0 0 3310.416 66.043 127.350 6 Kawardha 0 5 150 0 0 5 15 0 4049 99011 1961 0 1773 0 0 3082.552 27.450 101.880 8 Narayanpur 1 0 5 45 0 0 5 15 0 660 24152 153 0 2420 159 0 1292.023 16.681 50.940 10 Raipur 1 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 0 16976 498305 4725 0 900 700 0 10919.776 83.328 175.470 11 Rajnandgaon 1 ! 0 0 325 0 ” 0 0 0 0 6599 177847 2728 0 47 462 0 3309.692 0.000 0.000 12 Surguja 1 1 i 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 355 13929 382084 4620 0 3864 1078 0 10086.882 142.80d 405.900 Total No.of 1 4 3 0 8 0 0 0 7 0 0 1S5 3302 0 0 185 555 515 85798 2307918 28472 0 38327 5089 0 61244.113 698.760 1824.180 Catagorywite SFOs State total 1 190 5491 0 1 190 572 540 126121 3368767 46163 0 41387 8S07 0 86909.262 786.946 2359.050 % w.r.t Approval* for the whole ttata 0.00 97.37 60.13 0.00 0.00 97.37 97.03 95.37 68.03 68.51 61.69 0.00 92.61 59.82 0.00 70.47 88.79 77.33 P8 UPS Ratio 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 100 3938 82901 1852 0 10007 0 0 5155.194 66.951 178.290 % PS>S:1 UPS 1 allocationRatio 0.00 0.00 5.01 0,00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 18.52 3.12 2.46 4.01 0.00 24.18 0.00 0.00 5.93 8.51 7.56 ACR OAP>AOOOSabova 0 142 1600 0 0 142 426 355 44917 1311952 12189 0 13280 2348 0 31878.076 409.353 1016.560 % ACR GAP 74.74 38.94 allocation < 0.00 74.74 29.14 0.00 0.00 74.48 65.74 35.61 26.41 0.00 32.09 27.60 0.00 36.68 52.02 43.05 Catagorywla OoSO 0 142 • Total and 20,000* 0 142 575 0 426 160 14312 357122 4568 0 25560 570 0 15306.426 219.460 612.480 %a0aintt %OoSC ttata Allocation 0.00 74.74 10.47 0.00 0.00 74.74 74.48 29.63 11.35 10.60 9.90 0,00 61.76 6.70 0.00 17.61 27.89 25.96 allocation ST(2S%and ' abova) 0 180 2232 0 0 180 540 455 59395 1574924 19905 0 26090 3768 0 43132.392 563.420 1470.420 %ST aBocatlon 0.00 94.74 40.65 0.00 0.00 94.74 94 41 84.26 47.09 46.75 43.13 0.00 63.04 44.29 0.00 49.63 71.60 62.33 Naxanta OlstfftctaARoatad 0 180 1695 0 0 180 540 515 41176 1051369 14450 0 32393 2666 0 33309.501 378.944 1094.790 % Naxama AtfMtad o'.oo 94.74 30.87 0.00 0.00 94.74 94.41 95.37 32.65 31.21 31.31 0.00 78.27 31.34 0.00 38.33 48.15 46.41 AllocationDiftftcts Boys after class 3rd & 4th leave the school due to unavailability of communication means. District Weakness Strategies Suggestions/Remarks Dantewada- The districts has To provide assess, the Specific strategy is SFD A, SFD adverse PS and district has proposed 120 needed for schooling C, SFD D UPS ratio, which upper primary schools, facility in Nexalite is 4:2. moreover 39 Residential Schools. affected blocks. there is no eligible habitation as per The plan indicated to have NGO may be involved distance and strategies to overcome the to Implement the SSA population norm quality related issues. activities especially for of the coverage of OOSC. UPS. The district also proposed Due to physical to form monitoring team There is need to evolve barriers like" (5 member form effective highway, railways, community) at district mainstreaming & main market, other level to monitor the SSA Tracking plan for the geographical activities at least 5 days in children obstructions, some a months so that mid habitations are course correction can be There is a need to deprived of done. strengthen the schooling facilities community specially the The district has proposed mobilization. Naxalites for T.V & D.V.D vdth destroying the Tata Sky and unforms. There is need to done schools buildings. For SC/ST children the Migration mapping studying in Ashram shala. and as per the results In Konta block, the tie up should be the dropout rate & The district also proposed done with nearby states student and Archery Training, where the children is Teacher absentees Educational Tour, special migrating. is very high due to facilities such as drinking naxalite affected water facilities etc. in the block. hostels. The district has For the coverage of completed only OOSC, the district has 48% of PS proposed, RBC in Pota 7 49% of UPS cabin & in Ashram shala sanctioned under to cover 9807 children, SSA. Home based education/ Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 146 Night shelter to cover 52 There is language urban deprived children. problem in the 2201 children will be school as teachers directly enrolled. are not used to of the local language of the tribes. The district has not proposed any activities for The district has 5356 OOSC due to highest i.e 17416 Naxalites activities. OOSC. Similarly in social category wise, SC OOSC are 1548 & ST OOSC are 11094. There is miss match of the proposed activity for OOSC in Plan and in the costing sheet District Weakness Strategies Suggestions/Remarks Kanker- SFD Adverse PS : UPS 33 UPS proposed The State could come D ratio, the ratio up with the idea of being 1:3 opening small UPS on the lines of small PS so that many-more habitations qualify for opening of new primary schools. District Weakness Strategies Proposed by Suggestions of the District appraisal team for further improvement Kawardha - GER has not District should closely SFDD improved over the look into the matter and last year find out the reason for the same. The strategies should be planned to improve the enrolment ratios. Retention rate is Steps should be made not envisaged to towards improving the Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 147 improve in the retention rate. year 2009-10_____ While planning for Common treatment for all The district should girls education the areas indicate the major gaps district has not in the particular social planned for the category or area specific category (tribal/hilly etc.) by doing the micro-level analysis______ Overall, the plan does not seem to be an evidence based plan. The data for the planning of various activities is inadequate. The state is requested to record the commitments made by the districts and monitor/review the same on regular intervals. District Weakness Strategies Proposed by Suggestions of the District appraisal team for further improvement Narayanpur - OoSC are shown as Strategies proposed by Should get the SFDD total number only the district are common disaggregated number to all on gender, social category «& reason for dropping out of school. This will help the district to target and implement the appropriate initiative in different parts of district. School grant of Rs. The total district The data presented in - 2000/- per requirement is not based the table should be in primary/upper on the same fonrmla sync with the text primary school Teacher Grant: Rs. The district/state 500/- per teacher should see all the per year is asked. tables ^ d verify that But the table below they are co^ectly shows the presented. It also calculation as reveals the seriousness (Number of schools on preparation of * 500) i.e. Rs. 2.11 district plans. Lacs for all the 421 Primary Schools. Under the MIS Two computers are District ^ should head the district is proposed for four MIS propose and acquire proposing four personnel. atleast four computers personnel i.e. 1 so that the MIS programmer and 3 functions could be Appraisal Repnrt Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 148 data entry operator. performed smoothly. Internet connection should also be proposed. Results framework Should be provided is not present 25 Table are not Should be provided present in the district plan Overall, the plan does not seem to be an evidence based plan. The data for the planning of various activities is inadequate. The state is requested to record the commitments made by the districts and monitor/review the same on regular intervals. Being Naxal affected, the district should expedite on the areas where the achievement is not up to the mark by finding alternates. District Weakness Strategies Proposed by Suggestions of the District appraisal team for further improvement Rajnandgaon Mobile resource Not recruited any Should appoint the -SFDD advisor - have not advisor Mobile resource been put in place. advisor as early as 1 possible Vacant teacher District does not District should fill-up positions (state - 3770, commit to fill the the vacant positions in SSA -182) vacant position time bound manner Schools with SCR No strategy mentioned Rationalization will more than 100 for rationalization surely help to reduce the number of high PTR Achievement towards No reasons given District should ensure induction training for the induction training Upper Primary is provided to each teachers is only 61.33 teacher. The matter is more serious when it comes to Upper Primary Table 13 (No. of District/State should schools) have been verify before filled wrongly supplying the data/proposals for appraisal Outcomes & District should always commitments of present the outcome & AWP&B 2008-09 not commitments made in presented the previous year so that the progress can be acquainted Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 149 Overall, the plan seems to be all right. The state is requested to record the commitments made by the districts and monitor/review the same on regular intervals. The district should expedite on the areas where the achievement is not up to the mark. Being a SFD in two (PS: UPS & Naxal affected) areas the district did not plan to tackle the issues with a diverse approach. The District has an EDI value of 0.737 in the EDI calculated for all the districts of the country and placed in the third quartile. Still, there is a need to look at certain components separately where the district found to be lagging behind. District Weakness Strategies Suggestions/Remarks Surguja- Gap of more than 2364 ACR being In view of the fact that SFD B, SFD 3000 classrooms proposed. 1375 ACR approved in D 2008-09 are in progress, there will not possible any gap for ACR. However, the state is advised to re check the data. ST district 1. The district proposed to Imparting education in interventions impart education for class tribal dialect in classes I and 2 in tribal dialect. 1 and 2 will definitely 2. 25 schools are being attract students towards provided with 5 school and makes the computers each with CD, education interesting in education'kit and dresses. free and not something unknown. The provision of computers in upper primary schools in rural blocks will attract the children towards schools. Naxal affected No targeted strategies The district should district proposed. target the strategies to mobilize the conmiunity towards education and make efforts to make school more interesting.______ 6. Commeiit on the State’s overall direction/ preparedness towards meeting the expected outcomes identified for 2009-10 SNo. Expected outcome Status 1 Saturating access at Upper primary by This year, State has demanded only one PS & 348 upgradation of Upper primary schools to UPS to cover the gap. Though there is gap more Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 150 meet the desired ratio of 2:1 PS to UPS than 2:1 but there is no habitation with more than 40 eligible children to get admission in new UPS, so the gap exists 2 Saturating requirements of access at both Achieved. For scarcely populated tribal areas, there primary & Upper Primary level in villages are tribal Ashram Shalas & hostels to provide with 40% SC,ST & Muslim population access 3 Bringing all children to school by reducing Efforts are going on in this direction. OOSC are out of school children & tracking the enrolled in RBC running in hostels & schools. mainstreaming process Children are being mainstreamed in schools after RBC. Girls passing through RBCs are admitted in KGB Vs. CWSN are given home-based education and special RBCs from where they are admitted in regular schools. Child-tracking system is being implemented 4 Better identification system of children Teachers are given training to identify the CWSN with special needs including survey to & hence the number of CWSN is increasing due to improve this coverage improved identification skills. Piloting for survey & inclusion will be done in selected blocks with NGOs & showcasing of the whole process will be done with teachers to further improve CWSN identification skills 5 The share of enrollment of special focus Efforts are going on in this direction groups i.e. girls, SC, ST and Muslim minority children would reflect their share in the population in the district/ state and gaps in enrolment, dropouts, transition and learning levels will be eliminated 6 Improvement in learning levels & Different programs to improve the quality are being participation of children through specific implemented under LEP programs for reading & mathematics in early primary grades, Science & math at Upper Primary level with independent testing 7 The urban provisioning in terms of access, Night shelters are functioning in urban areas to SCR, PTR to be completed & coverage cover OOSC. Provisioning of need based plan of urban OOSC has been developed interventions is being done in urban areas 8 All vacant posts of teachers that of state Efforts are going on in this direction and sanctioned under SSA will be filled by June 09 9 All single teacher schools will have Recruitment is going on and priority is given to fill minimum of two teachers at primary level up single teacher schools and one teacher for every section at upper primary level 10 All spillover civil works will be completed - before 31®‘ July, 09 Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 151 Regional Institute of Education, Bhopal State - Chhattisgarh Districts monitored - Kabirdham, Rajnand Gaun and Bilaspur (Period: 1** August 2008 to 31*‘ January 2009) 1. Opening of New Schools Kabirdham Consolidated progress report prepared by the DPO states that there was no proposal to open new schools - neither primary nor upper primary, during the year 2008-09. However, the Annual Work Plan and Budget proposed to upgrade one PS in Lohara block into UPS. Bilaspur In Bilaspur district a No new schools has been opened during 2008-09 However the building is sanctioned for some of existing schools. Land for construction has been identified. Ml visited following schools, where the building has been sanctioned during 2008-09 in May 2008. 2. Civil Works Kabirdham School is a place of learning; hence one of its dimensions is its physicality. School as physical space includes classrooms with pucca roof to sit in, safe drinking water to drink and hygienic toilets and play grounds for healthy development and aesthetic surroundings to have joyful learning. 'Building As a Learning Aid (BALA) concept looks physical_space as learning space. In other words, construction of school building requires meeting the cognitive needs of all the children. The AWP proposed for 221 PS buildings whereas progress report tells us that sanction has been accorded to 210 Primary School buildings. AWP proposed for 2164, 625, and 7 Additional Rooms for PS, UPS and for existing Ashrams respectively. Further, AWP proposed 1026 BALA related constructions. However, sanction has been accorded to 210 buildings for Primary Schools only. Apart form that there are certain spills over civil works. As per progress report, civil works that were sanctioned for Drinking water facility. Toilet facilities, and BRC building construction in the preceding years have been 100 per cent achieved. In all the school Ml visited, toilets are in place separately for boys and girls. However, their maintenance needs to be improved much. Bilaspur In Bilaspur district, the construction of approximately 866 civil works were to be completed as backlog on 3J'’' March 2008, but these are not completed upto the due date and work is under progress during financial year 2008-09 as the carried over task. Thus 866 civil work as backlog and 1030 civil work sanctioned during 2008-09 are to be completed upto March 2009. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 1S2 1. Water curing of the civil work is not done properly. 2. Most of new civil work such as Building and Additional room has ramps of satisfactory quality. 3. Text Books Kabirdham Text-book is one of the fundamental learning resources in the hands of children. Bilaspur The text books has been distributed to the schools in Bilaspur district under SSA in the month of July 2008. In majority of schools books has been reached within time and these has been distributed to students in July and August 2008. The position of text book distribution in state seems better in comparison to the session of 2006-07 and 2007-08. MI during the visit observed certain cases of shortage of text books in some of the schools. 4. School Grants KabircHiam School grants and teacher grants are essential resources to address every' particular school's needs and requirements. DPO released stipulated grants to 99% of the total schools in the month of August. However, in most schools the MI visited in the month of December 2008 and January-2009, it was found that school grants were not put to use. Bilaspur 5. Teachers and Teacher Training Kabirdham There is provision of in-service training and special training to untrained new recruiters that leads to the award of diploma in teaching. Training programmes at different time intervals and for different time periods to different set of teachers have been organized. The Ml happened to participate two of such training programmes on 30/11/2008. Apart from these district level trainings, there are block level and cluster level short temi training sessions by SSA and NGOs. PRADHAM's Read India Read Chattisgarh pedagogical training and MGML 7 day training in Bodla block—ABL of Tamil Nadu ABL method is in operation in Bodla since January 15— says teachers. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 153 Bilaspur In the Bilaspur district the training of teachers at Block level has been organized during May- June 2008 and most of teachers has been trained according to target at block level. 6. Teaching and Learning Material (TLM) Grants Kabirdham In Kabirdham district, TLM grants to 3498 teachers of primary and upper primary school teachers have been released in the month of August. After due process DPO released grant to teachers. Though grant was released in the month of August, TLM preparation or purchase did not take place till December. This was noticed by the Ml during his first visit in the month of December. When asked for the delay, he was told that it was due to Assembly elections in Chattisgarh. During the second, and third visits, i.e., in the month of January, and Februaryt MI could see some wall paintings, charts, and maps on the walls of class rooms. Bilaspur The TLM grant has reached to almost all schools alongwith school grant through the transfer of money into the account of the school. In majority of schools it has reached in month of September and October. Few schools receive it in Nov./Dec. 2008. 7. EGS & AIE/NRBC/RBC: Kabirdham In Kabirdham district, DPO proposed to open RBCs, and NRBCs in the district. The consolidated progress report says out of identified 3558 OoSC, 847 were brought to RBCs and 2287 were brought to NRBCs totalling 3134 and rest 424 were mainstreamed. Bilaspur District project office, SSA, RGSM, Bilaspur informed that 6 night shelter centre are operate in district. Out of which 5 night shelter centre are located in different localities of Bilaspur City, Bilha block and one is functional at Sankri. Block Takhtpur. 8. Children With Special Needs (CWSN): ^ Kabirdham Kabirdham DPO identifiedl961 CWSN children in the district and the progress report claims that every identified CWSN is in formal school. In most of the schools Ml visited ramps have been built and teachers are conscious. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 154 Bilaspur In Bilaspur district, total 4280 children with special needs has been identified. No N.G.O. is involved in lED activities in the district. 9. National Programme for Education at Elementary Level (NPEGEL): Kabirdham There are 55 clusters and 43 NPEGEL in Kabirdham, popularly known as Sankiil Saheli shala. Every Sankul Saheli Shala has its own building and equipped with Meena material, gender sensitive materials, medical kit, games kit, sewing machine, computer and other material. Efforts are made to sensitize on girls education through community mobilization and mahila sam akhyas. Bilaspur The vocational training has been completed upto November 2008 in the district. NPEGEL Monitoring format is available at the district office and is under use to send the information to state project office. 10. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV): Kabirdham There are 4 blocks in Kabirdham and each block has one KGBV. MI visited all the KGB Vs. Intake of each~KGBV is 100. Presently there are 3% students in four KGBVs. Bilaspur In district Bilaspur, each of ten blocks have one functional Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya. Presently all KGBVs are functional in their ow^n building. 11. District Information System for Education (DISE): Kabirdham EMIS has been set up Kabirdham. The kabirdham MIS is equipped with 3 Computers (Pentium- IV), 2 printers, one each Laser Jet, and Desk Jet and the same is manned with 3 data entry operators. Bilaspur MIS Cell is set up at Bilaspur at district level. The activities of 2008-09 has been completed in stipulated time limit in the district. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Page 155 12. Research and Evaluation: Research has primarily two functions to perform namely, knowing the status and providing with required interventions to transform in the light of normative framework of any programme. The responsibility to conduct research has been assigned to DIET. 13. Functioning of the VECs. Bihispur Each school is having the committee in the district. MI feels that most of VECs are aware about their powers and ignorant about the duties/responsibilities in sprit of function. The frequency of meeting during last six months was average 2 to 5 times. 14. Staffing at District Level Bilaspur Staffing at district level is adequate and all posts are filled. 15. Mid Day Meal Scheme BiVaspwr MI in sample schools found that the meal has been served regularly and daily and observed no interruption. Key observations of the Rajnandgaon district As per requirement of the MHRD (Govt, of India), theiMonitoring Institution for SSA, Regional Institute of Education, Bhopal deputed a team of four faculty members for monitoring the activities conducted under SSA in the state of Chhatisgarh. One faculty member, Dr. Ramakar Raizada (team) visited the district Rajnandgaon during November 29 - December 8, 2008 and January 28 - February 6, 2009 to monitor the implementation of SSA in the district. Rajnandgaon is a rural bound district. There are nine Block Resource Centres in the district and 129 Cluster Resource centers (ranging from 10 to 22 per block). The number of schools to a cluster or number of clusters to a block is high. The team visited and had intensive discussions with the officials in the office of the DPC, DEO, DIET, BEOs, BRCs, CRCs, VECs, JBVS (SMSs) and Schools on the days of the duration and had detailed discussions with officials, coordinators, teachers, members of the society and children. The team offers the following observations and suggestions: Observations; 1. Sanctioned new school of 2008-09-is functional but there was delay in sanction of grants. 2. Civil work in the district is delayed, still 679 works are pending. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 156 3. All eligible students under SSA for distribution of textbook got the books and the distribution was in time. 4. School grants to PS and UPS were released in time. 5. Teachers are in position and teacher trainings are conducted in the district. 6. TLM grant to PS teachers is released by the DPC and to the UPS it has come through DIET. 7. Any EGS or AIE is not functional in the district. 8. Mostly children with special needs are admitted in the school, ramps are available and their check-up camps organized. Material was also given as per need. 9. NPEGEL and KGBV were not applicable in the district. 10. DISE system is functional in the district. 11. Researches are not conducted except action research. 12. VEC/ JBVS are functional in the district. 13. One/ two day coaching for the entrants of Navodaya Vidyalayas is given. 14. Remedial teaching for the students of poor result schools is arranged mostly before and after school hours. 15. Teaching programme for the drop-out was taken up to main stream them through Samtulyata Programme. Appraisal Report Chhattisgarh 2009 -10 Page 157 Annex- 1 Fact Sheet- 2009-10 State Chhattisgarh. No. of Districts 18 No. of Blocks 146 No. of Clusters 2169 No. of Villages 19305 Total population 2,12,92,439 Literacy Rate 61.56 Child Population- a. 6 ' } 1 years : 33,17,169 b. 11-14 years : 14,55,752 % of children passing with 60% Primary - 46.87 Upper Primary - 32.38 Educational Indicators: Enrolment I -V Enrolment VI -VIII Enrolment 1 - VIII Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total 1687343 1613802- 3301145 754435 688906 1443341 248225 2322721 4804972 GER NER Dropout rate Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total PS 102.71 102.28 102.56 99.49 99.(K) 99.20 8.14 9.86 9.59 UPS^ 99.52 99.04 99.14 98.69 97.99 98.44 10.98 11.92 11.41 Attendance Rate Completion rate Transition rate (Class V to VI) PS UPS Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total 71.00 73.50 NA 88.00 86.99 87.51 95.64 94.34 95.01 Out of school Children 6-11 years 11-14 years 6-14 years Bovs Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total 21178 22952 44130 10471 10293 20764 35581 36773 72354 Interventions Target for 2008-09 Target Achieved Target for 2009-01 1. Out of school children 116910 105863 72354 PS - 2.99 PS- 9.59 PS - 2.99 2. Dropout rate U PS-1.88 UPS-11.41 UPS-1.88 3. Attendance rate 74% 80% PS-93 PS-90.26 PS-93 4. Achievement level UPS-82 UPS-71.55 UPS-82 5. UPE Index 6. No of single teacher school 2000 6028 2000 7. No ot schools with PTR > 1200 2773 1200 60 8. No of building less schools 1500 2212 1200 (5 New Prim ar^ schools (including upgradations) Sanctioned till Opened till March Recommendation for Buildings Teachers TLE 2008-09 2009 2009-10 completed provided provided 9276 9276 1 8911 17191 9276 Up gradation of PS to UPS Sanctioned till Opened till March Recommendation for Buildings Teachers TLE 2008-09 2009 2009-10 completed provided provided 7121 7121 190 7121 21363 7121 EG S - N.A. Approved till Centers running as Centers to be Centnjs to be Centers to be 2008-09 on March 2009 upgraded to PS contiilued in closed 200 9-10 Centers j Children Centers Children Centres Children Centres Children Centres Children 1 Sub-District Structures Target for Achievement till Recommendation for functioning 2008-09 March 2009 2009-10 No. ofBRCs 146 146 146 [ No. ofCRCs 2169 2 \6 9 2169 1 Resource persons 2920 2920 2920 Teachers under SSA Sanctioned till In position Recommendation for 20C>9-10 2008-09 Against new Additional Total - schools teachers ^PS 28633 28093 2 540 542 UPS 26332 23324 570 0 570 Total 54985 51417 572 540 1112 Teacher Training Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation Type of training No. of teachers Duration (Norof day) for 2009-10 Target Achievement of the training a. In service 117957 99748 10 Days Block 126121 10 Days Cluster 126121 b. New recruits 13707 13707 30 Days 12276 c. Untrained 300 300 60 Days 8217 d. BRC/CRCC & 2315 1220 5 Days 2315 Resource Persons Total 134279 114975 263886 Interventions for Out of School Children Achievement of 2008-09 Targets for 2009-10 Strategy No. of No. of No. of No. of centers children centers children 1. Direct Admission j 06147 15955 2. E G S -P rim a ry - 3. EGS - Upper Primary - 4. Resdl Bridge course 825 26808 1069 41387 5. Non resdl Bridge Course 977 23192 403 8507 6. ROSS - Others 7. M aktab / M adarassas 8. Other Total 1802 156147 1472 65849 Remedial Teaching Target for 2008-09 Achievement till March 2009 Target for 2009-10 200828 108692 198678 Inclusive Education No. of children identified Covered till March Target for 2009-10 (No. of children to 2009 - be covered) 41672 41672 46153 Civil Works Sanctioned till Completed In progress Recommendation 2008-09 till March for 2009-10 (cumulative) 2009 School buildings (PS) 10050 , 9265 781 1 School buildings (UPS) 8112 7711 397 190 Additional Classrooms 22348 15477 6851 PS: 3243; UPS: 2248 Drinking Water 2228 2204 24 - Toilets 6149 6126 23 - Major repairs - PS 366 366 -- Major repairs - UPS 77 77 -- Residential Hostel ---- Furniture -- 14107 (Children in 1 district) REMS No. of research studies No. of research studies carried out during 2008- recommended for 2009-10 09 Research 6 6 Innovations a. ECCE Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation for 2009-10 No. of No. of No. of No. of Financial children Financial centers centers children enrolled 22919 753936 223.171 28114 778572 270.00 b. Girls Education Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation for 2009-10 Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 208510 262.008 111360 270.00 c. SC/ST Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation for 2009-10 Phy. 1 Fin. Phy. Fin. 103512 1 261.023 108711 270.00 d. CAL Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation for 2009-10 No. of No. of No. of No. of children Financial schools children Financial schools to to be covered covered covered be covered 383 35500 780.00 423 40000 900.00 e. Urban Deprived Children Progress for 2008-09 Target for 2009-10 Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1898 110.00 850 90.00 Community Mobilization Target for Progress till Recommendation for 2008-09 March 2009 2009-10 No. o fV E C s 44600 44600 45484 No. ofSMCs/PTA/MTA --- No. of VEC members to be trained 172114 139070 169278 NPEGEL M ajor Activities Target for 2008-09 Progress for 2008-09 Recommendation for 2009-10 Physical Financial Physical Financial Physical Financial Non Recurring 37.306 Recurring 1059 685.62 1052 549.16 1059 786.946 Total 1059 722.926 1052 549.16 1059 786.946 I t) KGBV Target till 2008-09 Operational till Construction of KGBV till Target for 2009-10 M arch 2009 M arch 2009 No. of Enrollment No. of Enrollment Completed In Yet to No. of Enrollment KGBV KGBV progress be start KGBVs 93 8774 93 8774 38 55 - 93 9100 ( i Projyoscd 1 Proposed j Proposed Proposed 1 1 Baseline as in .\chievcmen( s. No 1 Oiilcoiiie Iiulicalors Data source achievement achievenjeut in achievem ent in achievem ent in 2007-08 2008-09 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 201 1 -1 2 i GOAI-1: All children in Scliool / F/GS ceiUres / ,\Jteniativc and liiiiovati'c* Ediioalion ccnttes N i n n l v i of children aged 6-14 \ e a i . s not Stale [IH Sur\'eys ^007- i oiHoiled in School EGS Centres / /ME 169753 116910 105863 62692 5432 4230 0 8 > C enties 2 Niitnbei' of children enrolled in scliool.s :005 ; D!.SE) 4195222 4437537 4543400 4606092 4611524 4615754 3 Ratio of PrimaiA' to Upper Priinaiy Schools (2005 : DISE) 2.6 2.6 2.5 2 4 2.38 2.36 Number of children with special needs (CWSN) 4 enrolled in school or alternative system including PMIS Repoit 41672 35129 45169 46235 46153 47213 home based education G O A L II : Bridging gender and social categoiT gaps Girls, increase as a share of students enrolled at 5 C005 : DISE) 47.27 48.5 48.5 49 49 49.5 Primaiy and Upper Primary level. Scheduled Castes & Schedule Tribe children increase 6 as a share of students enrolled in Primary' and Upper (2005 : DISE) SC 14.1 14.5 14.7 14.9 15 15 Priinaiy Schools ' (2005 ; i:)ISE) ST 31.34 32 32.2 32.4 32.5 32.5 GOAL III: Universal Retention (T- »oO Transition rates from Primaiy to Upper Primaiy to n 83.89 94 90 95 95.5 96 increase (2005 :D1SE) 8 Retention at Primarv level (2005 : DISE) 67.2 68 69.52 73 75 78 9 Retention atelemeiitaiv level (2005 :D1SE) 63.4 65 66.32 69 71 75 GOAL IV: Educaiion of Satisfactoj^ Quality Provision of quality inputs to improve learning 10 (i) Teachers AWP&B 00-10 113715 131693 132989 134135 134135 134135 fii) Tcachin^ I..earning Material A\VP&B 00-10 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 11 Process indicators on quality • Teachei Training AVVP&BOO-IO 73 78 82 90 95 95 • Teacher support & Academic Supen'ision AWP&B 00-10 60 65 70 80 80 80 (iii) C.'lassroom Practices AV/P&B 00-10 30 40 50 42 45 48 (iv) Pupil Assessment by States AVVP&B 09-10 12 12 7 7 7 7 I (v) Attendance Rales - Students AWP&B 00-10 70% 75% 73% 77% 88% 90% - Teachers AWP&B 00-10 70% 75% 74% 80% 90% 90% 12 Accountahilitv to the communitv AWP&B 00-10 50% 60% 70% 90% 90% 90% PS Math - 38.36% PS Math - 45% UPS Math - 28.96% UPS Math - 35% 40% 45 (200.V N'C'ERT National comparable student achievement level N'aiioniil Assessment PS Lang - 49.69% PS Lang - 55% UPS Lang - 43.24% UPS Lang - 50% 55% 60% Sample Survey! Pfe EVS- 43.15% PS EVS- 50% UPS EVS- 35.04% UPS EVS- 40% 50% 60% 1 UPS-SSC- 39.66% UPS-SSC- 45% 52% 53% List of Quatity Parameters: SNo. Description Baseline (08-09) Target/outcome (09-10) (Data to be fiHed by States alongwith source of data) Provision of quality inputs to improve learning levels (i) Pupil teacher ratio at primary level :34 Same status will be (i) Teacher (ii) Pupil Teacher Ratio at upper primary maintained in 2009 - 10 Availability :23 (iii) Number of districts with PTR>60 at elementary level: NIL Source: (2007-08: P I S E ) ______(ii) Availability of Percentage of eligible students receive Same status will be Teaching Learning free text books ;J 00% maintained in 2009 - JO Materials (Source be given also) Percentage of teachers received TLM grants : (Source be given also) ] 00% Number of schools state-wise using materials other than text6ooks :100% (e.g. workboaks/worksheets/ABL Cards/Kits/CAL/Supplementary books etc.) (Source be given also) Process indicators on quality Percentage of teachers received in-service Target : 100% (i) Teacher training training against annual target : 85% (till December end) (Source be given)______(ii) Teacher Support Percentage of BRCs/CRCs are operational ] 00% & Academic :100% Supervision (Source be given) The State aims to Effectiveness of BRC/CRC in academic maintain better supervision and improving school standards performance : (* Performance against agreed roles & functions * Extent to which task are being done. 100% * Extent of on-site support given to 100% SNo. Description Baseline (08-09) Target/outcome (09-10) (Data to be filled by States alongwith source of data) schools/teachers Content & quantum of training given to BRC/CRC 100% * Perception of teachers/stakeholders. _Very good [Source be oiven]______(iii) Classroom Change in classroom practices/ innovative Practices methodologies in use ; (* Teachers instructional time. 60% (^' Teachers * Student learning opportunity time. 30% instructional time. 50% * Active student participation 40% * Student learning * Use of other materials in classrooms opportunity time. 50% 100% * Active student * No. of instructional days 220 days participation 50% No. of days teachers were assigned non * Use of other teaching activities.) 15 to 20 days materials in classrooms (Source be given) 100% No. of instructional days 220 days * No. of days teachers were assigned non teaching activities.) 10 days (iv) Pupil Pupil Assessment System in place in 7 in a year Assessment by States schools : Exercise on question 7 in a year bank (Testing systems & frequency)______(v) Attendance Rates Student Attendance level at primary and Primary 75% at upper primary:67.7 % at PS 75% at Upper Primary : 80% Student Attendance UPS level Research study report ______Teacher Attendance Teacher Attendance level at primary and Primary 80%' upper primary; 75.7% at Primary and Upper Primary ; 80% 73.5 % at UPS Research study report______Accountability to the VEC/SEMC/local bodies role in school Strengthening of school community supervision as per State mandate: level committees Functional. Committees formed National Student Learning levels for Class 111 Learning levels for achievement level Percentage in.Maths 41.96%> Class III outcom es Percentage in Language 50.69% Percentage in Maths (2003: NCERT National Assessment 45% SNo. Description Baseline (08-09) Target/outcome (09-10) (Data to be filled by States alongwith ______source of data)______Sample Survey- Round I, Round II) Percentage in Lang. 55% Learning levels for class V Learning levels for Percentage in Maths 38.36% class V Percentage in Language 49.69% Percentage in Maths Percentage in EVS 43.15% 45% (2005: NCERT National Assessment Percentage in Lang. Sample Survey - Round 1, Round II) 55% Percentage in EVS 50% Learning levels for Class VIII Learning levels for Percentage in Maths 28.96% Class VIII Percentage in Language 43.24% Percentage in Maths Percentage in Science 35.04% 35% Percentage in Social Science 39.66% Percentage in Lang. (2002: NCERT National- Assessment 50% Sample Survey - Round I, Round II) Percentage in Sc. 40% Percentage in S. Sc. 45% PROGRESS FORMATS CONSOLIDATE PROGRESS REPORT Achievement Total Approved Percentage of SNo. Interventions (Completed/Coverage Up (upto 2008-09) Achievement to 31 March, 2009) 1 Primary School Openning 9276 9276 100.00 2 Upper Primary Openning 7121 7121 100.00 3 Teachers' Recruitment 53391 51028 95.58 4 Primary School Building 10050 6983 69.49 5 Upper Primary School Building 8112 6451 1 79.53 6 Additional Class Rooms (ACR) 22348 11846 53.01 7 Drinking Water Facility 2228 2157 96.82 8 Toilet Facility 6149 6110 99.37 9 KGBV Functional 93 93 100.00 10 KGBV Building Construction 93 37 39.79 11 In service Teachcv's Tvaiftmg (20 days)* H5642 99748 86.26 12 New Teacher's Training (30 days)* 13707 12534 91.45 13 Untrained Teacher's Training (30 days)* 300 300 100.00 14 Dist. of free text book* 3259177 3259177 100.00 15 Dist. of Teachers'grant*' 115942 122396 105.57 16 Dist. of School grant* 46093 46093 100.00 17 Dist. o f TLE grant* 34 9 26.48 18 Remedial Teaching* 200828 152375 75.88 19 Out of School Children* 169753 156047 91.93 20 Progress on Incisive Education 46153 46153 100.00 2J Progress on NPEGEL (MCS) 1059 1059 100.00 'Approved and Achievemenl of year 2008-09 PROGRESS OF SCHOOL OPENING AND TEACHERS RECRUITMENT Primary Schools Sanctioned (Yearwise) Total Schools % S.no. District 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 1 Sanctioned Opened Achievement 1 Bastar 'l2 643 139 70 249 203 1316 1316 100 2 Bijapur 3 Bilaspur 0 466 49 , 33 11 0 559 559 100 4 Dantewada 69 389 30 228 205 49 970 970 100 5 Dhamtari 12 105 16 68 1 0 1 203 203 100 6 Durg 0 123 0 30 4 0 157 157 100 7 Janjgir-Champa 0 267 40 46 87 0 440 440 100 8 Jashpur 0 327 296 0 56 46 725 725 100 9 Kanker 6 356 85 27 50 76 600 600 100 10 Kawardha 0 231 26 19 20 ' 0 296 296 100 11Korba 0 305 112 2 58 25 502 502 100 12 Korea 0 214 0 70 49 0 333 333 100 13 Mahasamund 0 50 43 20 16 0 128 128 100 14 Narayanpur 15 Raigarh 0 226 142 41 43 0 2 454 454 100 16 Raipur 0 221 118 87 186 0 6 618 618 100 17 Rajnandgaon 0 1 157 46 49 24 0 276 276 100 18 Surguja 0 882 186 276 355 0 1699 1699 100 Total 99 4962 1327 1066 1414 399 9 9276 9276 100 Upper Primary Schools Sanctioned "Yearwise) Total Schools % s.no. District 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Sanctioned Opened Achievement 1 Bastar 42 26 48 500 109 101 826 826 100 2 Bijapur 0 0 3 Bilaspur 50 74 158 59 171 0 512 512 100 4 Dantewada 73 0 43 80 80 15 291 291 100 5 Dhanntari 8 79 6 112 5 2 212 212 100 6 Durg 77 69 25 12 266 0 449 449 100 7 Janjgir-Champa 58 40 40 91 97 85 24 435 435 100 8 Jashpur 50 21 52 41 48 41 253 253 100 9 Kanker 21 10 50 114 52 31 278 278 100 10 Kawardha 16 40 40 178 90 T 365 365 100 11 Korba 21 0 42 37 79 40 1 219 219 100 12 Korea 20 20 20 18 157 13 248 248 100 13 Mahasamund 35 42 33 51 52 23 236 236 100 14 Narayanpur 0 0 15 Raigarh 40 68 65 19 288 0 480 480 100 16 Raipur 110 133 0 352 205 66 866 866 100 17 Rajnandgaon 100 31 37 16 95 28 1 308 308 100 18 Surguja 50 50 119 150 774 0 1143 1143 100 Total 771 703 778 1830 2568 446 25 7121 7121 100 Teachers Sanctioned (Yearwise) i Recruitment Sanctioned Recruitment Total S.n Total 2008-09 2008-09 District Recruitment till % o. 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Teachers Achievement Sanctioned Total F-emale Primary Science Maths Total Primary Science Maths Total 1 Bastar 901 1338 422 1640 576 512 5389 4119 76 1 68 69 0 0 0 2 Bijapur 948 0 0 0 0 3 Bilaspur 100 1732 688 243 1362 810 4935 5194 105 0 124 124 0 0 0 4 Dantewada 1084 778 189 696 445 94 3286 1885 57 0 73 73 0 0 0 5 Dhamtari 272 368 361 472 17 6 1496 1464 98 1 87 88 1 0 1 6 Durg 1294 984 221 96 1464 0 4059 3574 88 0 146 146 0 0 0 7 Janjgir-Champa 716 2112 200 365 465 255 4113 3891 95! 0 170 170 0 0 0 8 Jashpur 158 696 750 123 200 194 2121 2000 94 0 71 71 0 0 0 9 Kanker 224 732 320 396 208 196 2076 2076 100 2 31 33 0 31 31 10 Kawardha 32 785 234 572 408 3 2034 2006 99 0 56 56 0 0 0 11 Korba 124 972 471 115 295 145 2122 2122 100 11 21 32 0 21 21 12 Korea 40 520 60 194 520 39 1373 1259 92 11 40 51 10 40 50 13 Mahasamund 215 368 557 193 188 69 1590 1590 100 0 77 77 0 77 77 14 Narayanpur 181 0 0 0 0 15 Raigarh 280 690 479 139 950 0 2538 2311 91 ' 2 108 110 0 108 108 16 Raipur 220 1508 3659 1230 987 198 7802 8102 104 6 243 249 6 99 105 17 Rajnandgaon 275 376 203 146 489 84 1573 1422 90 0 134 134 0 100 100 -i8 Surguja 385 2091 729 1002 2677 0 6884 6884 100 11 100 111 0 0 0 rotal 6320 16050 9543 7622 11251 2605 53391 51028 96 45 1549 0 1594 17 476 0 493 PROGRESS OF SCHOOL OPENING AND TEACHERS' RECRUITMENT PROGRESS OF OUT OF SCHOOL CWILDREN (OoSC) D irect No. o f RBC NRBC Madarasa Other intervention Total ! T o tal E n ro lm e n t s D istrici enrolment in EG S O oS C in EG S Coverage mainstreamed C’overage mainstreamed Coverage mainstreamed Coverage mainstreamed Coverage mainstreamed regular school cen ters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1Bastar 26186 1 7387 0 0 4278 4278 4217 4217 0 0 150 150 8645 8645 2 B ijapiir 32403 21319 0 0 2479 2479 2477 2477 0 0 0 0 4956 4956 3 FJilaspur 15053 4215 0 0 4541 4 5 4 1 6271 6271 0 0 100 100 10912 10912 4 Dantewacia 33554 24452 0 0 1181 1181 856 856 0 0 200 200 2237 2237 5 D ham tari 2023 218 0 0 1047 1047 758 631 0 0 31 31 1836 1709 6 D uig 7195 1685 0 0 2932 2932 2123 2\2y 0 0 50 50 5105 5105 7 Janjgir_Champa 6076 5507 0 0 330 -39 239 139 0 0 200 200 769 300 8Jashpur 6401 4420 0 0 1130 1 130 818 ' 818 0 0 200 200 2148 2148 9 K anker 2096 1424 0 0 192 56 314 181 0 0 200 200 706 437 10 Kawardha 3558 175 0 0 1220 1220 1321 645 0 0 390 300 2841 2165 11 Korba 5586 5474 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 200 200 200 12 Korea 2884 1906 0 0 481 467 490 r 480 0 0 0 0 971 947 13 M ahasam und 1281 433 0 0 434 434 315 315 0 0 150 150 899 899 14 N arayanpur 2530 982 0 0 847 847 613 613 0 0 50 50 1510 1510 15Raigarh 2312 1068 0 0 631 1 631 457 ^ 457 0 0 200 200 1288 1288 16 R aipur 5080 3775 0 0 524 74 380 330 0 0 100 100 1004 504 17 Rajnandgaon 6569 5575 0 0 551 551 399 399 0 0 0 0 950 950 18 Surguja 8966 6132 0 0 1679 1679 1044 1044 0 0 200 200 2923 2923 TOTAL 169753 106147 0 0 24477 23508 23092 21996 0 0 2331 2331 49900 47835 PROGRESS OF CIVIL WORKiS AS ON 31ST JANUARY 2009 Primary School Buildings Sanctioned (Yearwise) ■o T5 Of) « — C “ 3 TT >n r- ao 2 .2 .S ^ tc u s District o cp « o o "JS oc ^ a rii Tf m \C a :2 2 I! S O o o a s a. eo V fSl9 fS9 s “If u CQ 8 1 Baslar 0 0 38 62 243 454 185 87 1069 600 458 11 56.127 2 Bijapur 0 4 33 24 60 125 5 0 251 142 109 0 56.574 3 Bilaspur 0 11 142 60 67 118 0 161 559 332 111 0 59.392 4 Dan lew ad a 0 16 62 46 ' 140 580 57 70 971 593 378 0 61.071 5 Dhamtari 0 5 5 15 90 65 0 40 220 177 37 6 80.455 6 Durg 5 50 100 0 188 19 0 15 377 341 32 4 90.451 7 .lanjgir-champa 0 0 40 19 256 141 85 19 560 450 105 5 80.357 8 Jashpur 0 10 45 25 40 146 46 123 435 271 164 0 62.299 10 Kanker 0 13 53 33 165 113 103 39 519 451 68 0 86.898 9 Kawardha 0 20 35 15 57 76 . 0 210 413 190 223 0 46.005 11 Korba 5 55 60 104 143 40 178 585 375 210 0 64.103 12 Korea 0 0 30 2 60 199 .. JO 11 372 332 40 0 89.247 13 Mahasamund 0 10 21 40 24 18 0 15 128 112 16 0 87.500 14 Narayanpur 0 0 7 15 27 66 18 0 133 37 79 17 27.820 15 Raigarh 0 15 20 20 65 190 24 120 454 281 173 0 61.894 16 Raipur 0 15 30 70 152 292 109 28 696 554 136 0 79.598 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 82 60 85 153 4 1 385 328 57 0 85.195 18 Surguja 0 50 100 70 400 750 355 198 1923 1417 506 0 73.687 Total 5 ,224 898 636 2223 3648 1101 1315 10050 6983 3018 43 69.483 PROGRESS OF CIVIL WORKS AS ON 31ST JANUARY 2009 District Upper Primary School Buildings Sanctioned (Yearwise) in -0 District Additiona Classrooms (ACR) Sanctioned (Yearv^'ise) "Ou t3 •c 90 Ov Si ^ o o o o'>C O O 15 o •S « C U IS ^ s ■4 «/) t^ oc US M) ■o o ^ '5. o s © 9 c 3 2 3 Z S o . o o 2 o SOeai f y o 3 a. CQ Z fN n f -o Vj , District Drinkine Water Facility Sanctioned (Yearwise) "O ^ i C/3 so 30 OV — c I I '3 ofS o o-ST © o o o o 2 .2 (/3 s >n >£9 oo o i l :2 £ -a o ^ "a. o o orn i o '3 Z E o o o o o et Cfi V n n * c/5 “ a ,s >> 8 1 Bastar 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 100.000 2 Bijapur 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 4 18 0 18.182 3 Bilaspur 0 0 0 163 100 0 0 0 263 263 0 0 100.000 4 Dantewada 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0100.000 5 Dhamtari 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 150 97 53 0 64.667 6 Durg 0 0 0 180 25 0 0 0 205 205 0 0 100.000 V 7 Janjgir-champa 0 0 0 50 20 0 0 0 70 70 0 0 100.000 8 Jashpur 0 0 298 5 0 0 0 303 303 0 0 100.000 10 Kankcr 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 55 55 0 0 100.000 9 Kawardha 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 108 108 0 0 100.000 11 Korba 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 100.000 12 tCorea 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 100.000 13 Mahasamund 0 0 150 160 0 0 0 310 310 0 0 100.000 14 Narayanpur 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 100.000 15 Raigarh 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0.000 16 Raipur 0 0 0 150 100 0 0 0 250 250 0 0100.000 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 200 200 0 0 100.000 18 Surguja 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 30 0 0 0.000 Total 0 0 0 1738 490 0 0 0 2228 2157 71 0 96.813 PROGRESS OF CIVIL WORKS AS ON 3IST JANUARY 2009 District ■o tn "O Toilets Facility Sanctioned (Yearwise) a i ■o 30 e L o TT IT) \o o ON 5 .2 II 0£ :s trt "S s o O o o 1 f 3 2 •V o ^ ■q- TT in so QC ^ c 3 a 'a t! B o o o o on “ u M .5 oa 5 Dhamtari 0 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 300 300 0 0 100.000 6 Durg 0 350 0 60 0 0 0 0 410 410 0 0 100.000 7 Janjgir-champa 0 0 100 200 0 0 0 0 300 300 0 0 100.000 8 Jashpur 0 200 172 0 0 0 0 372 372 0 0 100.000 10 Kanker 0 0 175 55 0 0 0 0 230 230 0 0 100.000 9 Kawardha 0 0 250 265 0 0 0 0 515 515 0 0 100.000 11 Korba 100 200 200 0 0 0 0 500 500 0 0 100.000 12 Korea 0 0 175 150 I 0 0 0 0 325 325 0 0 100.000 13 Mahasamund 0 100 200 225 0 0 0 525 488 37 0 92.952 14 Narayanpur 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 0 100.000 . 15 Raigarh 0 100 300 0 0 0 0 400 399 1 0 99.750 16 Raipur 0 0 413 200 0 0 0 0 613 613 0 0 100.000 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 250 0 0 ' 0 0 0 250 249 1 0 99.600 18 Surguja b 0 0 700 0 0 ,0 0 700 700 0 0 100.000 Total 0 450 2173 aioi 425 0 0 0 6149 6110 39 0 99.366 PROGRESS OF CIVIL WORKS AS ON 31ST JANUARY 2009 t/3 T3 ■a D istrict BRC Building Sanctioned (Yearwise) S) i OX) b f 1 c 3 VO ae ON 5 O ;S ^ s ^ 0) S o o e o o , ® o ^ "S. •H '4 in vi 00 2 1 3 2 o o o o o H e 3 a 1m0 ^ £ o o O o o 2 w CQ o r-l n c/3 “ u M c CJ 1 Bastar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 2 Bijapur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 3 Bilaspur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 4Dan tew a da 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0.000 5 Dhamtari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 6 Durwc? 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 12 0 0 100.000 7 Janjgir-champa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 8 Jashpur (J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 10 Kan Rer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 9 Kawardha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 11 Korba 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 12 Korea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 13 Mahasaniund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 14 Narayanpur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 15 Raigarh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 16 Raipur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 18 Surguja 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 Total 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 100.000 PROGRESS OF CIVIL WORKS AS ON 3IST JANUARY 2009 T5 v: "C District CRC Buiidine Sanctioned (Yearwise) V 0£i « ■V TT I/O ac — e .S « C -w o O o o o O o o M O •JZ Ot) « S ra rA IT) sO r- ac 1 1 :2 E 3 o "a. o 2 o o o o H e 3 S s c. '5 Z B © o o « CQ « o fSI cn ^ u “ = V 1 Bastar 0 0 26 43 90 0 8 0 167 141 20 6 84.431 2 Bijapur 0 0 8 14 25 0 6 0 53 36 17 0 67.925 3 Bilaspur 0 0 30 55 67 0 0 0 152 145 7 0 95.395 4 Dantewada 0 0 17 26 50 0 3 0 96 76 20 0 79.167 5 Dhamlari 0 0 15 25 35 0 6 0 81 81 0 0 100.000 6 Durg 0 0 5 50'1 85 0 83 0 223 208 15 0 93.274 7 Janjgir-champa 0 0 30 40 26 0 0 , 0 96 93 3 0 96.875 8 Jashpur 0 10 25 45 0 0 8 88 80 8 0 90.909 10 Kanker 0 0 10 30 50 0 34 0 124 108 16 0 87.097 9 Kawardha 0 0 15 25^ 15 0 0 0 55 55 0 0 100.000 11 Korba 0 12 25 52 0 0 0 89 89 0 0 100.000 12 Korea 0 0 5 15' 25 0 0 25 70 50 20 0 71.429 13 Mahasamund 0 ID 25 35 0 48 0 118 97 21 0 82.203 14 Narayanpur 0 4 ■ 7 5 0 6 0 22 13 4 5 59.091 15 Raigarh 0 20 20 20 0 . 0 45 105 63 42 0 60.000 16 Raipur 0 0 45 75 142 0 0 0 262 251 11 0 95.802 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 20 35 50 0 24 0 129 122 7 0 94.574 18 Surguja 0 0 20 60 100 0 0 69 239 176 63 0 73.640 Total 0 0 302 585 917 0 218 147 2169 1884 274 11 86.860 PROGRESS OF PEDAGOGY tn Service Teachers' Training {20 Days) Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 7531 7531 100 2 Bijapur 2038 2038 100 3 Bilaspur 11302 11302 100 4 Dantewada 4286 4286 100 5 Dhamtari 3660 0 0 6 Durg 11089 60 1 7 Janjgir-Champa 7340 5455 74 8 Jashpur 5369 5165 96 9 Kanker 4879 4879 100 10 Kawardha 3498 1433 41 11 Korba 4863 802 16 12 Korea 2935 2935 100 13 Mahasamund 4273 4273 100 14 Narayanpur 669 669 100 15 Raigarh 7014 16614 237 16 Raipur 16272 16272 100 17 Rajnandgaon 6381 5435 85 18 Surguja 12243 10599 87 115642 99748 86 New Teachers' Training (30 Days) Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 1046 1046 100 2 Bijapur 123 123 100 3 Bilaspur 1633 1233 76 4 Dantewada 187 187 100 5 Dhamtari 539 539 100 6 Durg 770 297 39 7 Janjgir-Champa 1167 1483 127 8 Jashpur 458 458 100 9 Kanker 1031 436 42 10 Kawardha 477 477 100 11 Korba 485 485 100 12 Korea 436 436 100 13 Mahasamund 309 309 100 14 Narayanpur 219 219 100 15 Raigarh 709 285 40 16 Raipur 662 662 100 17 Rajnandgaon 1618 1463 90 18 Surguja 1838 2396 130 Total 13707 12534 91 )> « Untrained Teachers' Training (60 Pays) Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 2 Bijapur 300 300 100 3 Bilaspur 4 Dantewada 5 Dhamtari 6 Durg 7 Janjgir-Champa 8 Jashpur 9 Kanker 10 Kawardha 11 Korba 12 Korea 13 Mahasamund 14 Narayanpur 15 Raigarh 16 Raipur 17 Rajnandgaon 18 Surguja To\ai 300 300 100 Distribution of Free Text Books Approved in s.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 224814 224814 100 2 Bijapur - 27009 27009 100 3 Bilaspur 330888 330888 100 4 Dantewada 75840 75840 100 5 Dhamtari 106201 106201 100 6 Durg 359431 359431 100 7 Janjgir-Champa 207066 207066 100 8 Jashpur 118522 118522 100 9 Kanker 109880 109880 100 10 Kawardha 96436 96436 100 11 Korba 185804 185804 100 12 Korea 84213 84213 100 13 Mahasamund 137972 137972 100 14 Narayanpur 22672 22672 100 15 Raigarh 184542 184542 100 16 Raipur 462514 462514 100 17 Rajnandgaon 177847 177847 100 18 Surguja 347526 347526 100 Total 3259177 3259177 100 Distribution of Teacher Grant Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 7531 7531 100 2 Bijapur 2338 2338 100 3 Bilaspur 11302 11296 100 4 Dantewada 4286 12243 286 5 Dhamtari 3660 3740 102 6 Durg 11089 10867 98 7 Janjgir-Champa 7340 6906 94 8 Jashpur 5369 5165 96 9 Kanker 4879 4794 98 10 Kawardha 3498 3498 100 11 Korba 4863 4802 99 12 Korea 2935 2935 100 13 Mahasamund 4273 4273 100 14 Narayanpur 669 669 100 15 Raigarh 7014 7014 100 16 Raipur 16272 15748 97 17 Rajnandgaon 6381 6334 99 18 Surguja 12243 12243 100 Total 115942 122396 106 Distribution of School Grant Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 3970 3970 100 2 Bijapur 1019 1019 100 3 Bilaspur 3640 3640 100 4 Dantewada 1806 1806 100 5 Dhamtari 1380 1380 100 6 Durg 3510 3510 100 7 Janjgir-Champa 2392 2392 100 8- Jashpur 2394 2394 100 9 Kanker 2128 2128 100 10 Kawardha 1566 1566 100 11 Korba 2087 2087 100 12 Korea 1437 1437 100 13 Mahasamund 1826 1826 100 14 Narayanpur 522 522 100 15 Raigarh 3022 3022 100 16 Raipur 4681 4681 100 17 Rajnandgaon 2652 2652 100 18 Surguja 6061 6061 100 Total 46093 46093 100 1T6 Distribution of TLE Grant Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 0 0 2 Bijapur 0 0 3 Bilaspur 0 0 4 Dantewada 0 0 5 Dhamtari 1 0 0 6 Durg 0 0 7 Janjgir-Champa 24 0 0 8 Jashpur 0 0 9 Kanker 0 0 10 Kawardha 0 0 11 Korba 0 0 12 Korea 0 0 13 Mahasamund 0 0 14 Narayanpur 0 0 15 Rakvavh 2 2 100 16 Raipur 6 6 100 17 Rajnandgaon 1 1 100 18 Surguja 0 0 Total 34 9 26 Remedial Teaching Approved in S.no. District Achievement % Achievement 2008-09 1 Bastar 13509 12560 93 2 Bijapur 2567 2567 100 3 Bilaspur 20300 20300 100 4 Dantewada 4757 4500 95 5 Dhamtari 6363 6363 100 6 Durg 22611 3280 15 7 Janjgir-Champa 14418 0 0 8 Jashpur 6058 6000 99 9 Kanker 6884 6489 94 10 Kawardha 6785 6785 100 11 Korba 8812 0 0 12 Korea 4755 4755 100 13 Mahasamund 9682 9682 100 14 Narayanpur 1259 1259 100 15 Raigarh 10188 10188 100 16 Raipur 29958 29958 100 17 Rajnandgaon 12532 11794 94 18 Surguja 19390 15895 82 Total 200828 152375 76 District wise Progress Format on IE S. No. Name of the No. of CW SN No. of CWSN No. of CWSN No. of CWSN No. of No. of No. of % District identified covered , covered provided aids NGOs Resource Schools Expenditure tlirough through Home and appliances involved Teachers made on IE EGS/AIE Based appointed Barrier Education Free 1 1 Bastar 1755 20 20 12 1 4 33 100 2 Bijapur 961 , 0 0 . 12 0 3 7 100 oO 3 Bilaspur 4280 20' 20 100 0 10 44 100 4 Dantewada 1852 0 0 12 0 3 2 100 5 Dhamtari 1445 10 10 10 0 4 20 100 6 Durg 6102 20 20 25 0 12 400 58 7 Janiqir-Champa 1665 0 0 12 0 4 50 0 8 Jashpur 1967 43 43 12 0 2 18 94 9 Kanker 2381 20 20 5 0 3 33 93 10 Kawardha 1961 29 29 0 1 3 43 0 11 Korba 1089 20 20 10 2 2 15 0 12 Korea 1524 0 0 7 0 2 90 97 13 Mahasamund 3409 ■ 100 100 45 0 3 50 100 14 Narayanpur 153 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 15 Raigarh 3536 50 50 42 2 5 44 100 16 Raipur 4725 75 75 133 3 12 2 100 17 Rajnandgaon 2728 30 30 3 4 72 84 18 Surguja 4620 . 100 100 10 3 6 107 100 Total 46153 537 537 ' 447 15 82 1080 81 NPEGEL Progress Report Format No. of clusters in urban No. of Model Cluster Construction of No of Blocks No. of clusters No. o f slum s School (MCS) cumlative Additional Classrooms 1 G irls . s D istrict Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative enrolled in Cumulative Target till Target till 2008- Target till Target till Target till Achievemenl Achievement Achievemenl Achievement MCS Achievemenl 2008-09 09 2008-09 2008-09 2008-09 I Bastar 12 12 167 167 0 0 167 167 124788 167 142 2 Bijapur 4 4 53 53 4 4 57 57 37057 57 30 '■y Bilaspur 10 10 152 152 22 22 174 ' 174 228172 152 130 4 Dantewada 7 7 96 96 6 6 102 102 62240 89 69 5 Dhamtari 2 2 39 39 0 0 39 39 0 22 20 6 Durg 3 3 54 54 1 1 55 55 19073 43 34 7 Janjgir_Champa .7 7 71 71 1 ] 72 72 19674 72 72 8 Jashpur 6 6 60 60 0 0 60 60 19478 59 58 9 Kanker 1 1 16 16 0 0 16 16 0 15 10 10 Ka ward ha 4 4 55 55 0 ' 0 55 55 53759 53 49 11 Korba 5 5 89 89 8 8 97 97 106713 89 77 12 Korea 4 4 52 52 0 0 52 52 39013 52 50 13 Mahasamund 3 3 70 70 0 0 70 70 0 22 29 Ws) 14 Narayanpur 2 2 22 22 0 0 22 22 ' 12885 32 20 15 Raigarh 4 4 50 50 0 0 50 50 28737 53 45 16 Raipur 8 ,8 141 141 7 7 148 148 149559 136 112 17 Rajnandgaon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Surguja 19 19 239 239 1 1 240 240 165806 234 219 TOTAL 101 101 1426 1426 50 50 1476 1476 1066954 1347 1166 Construction of Drinking Water Construction of ToJffets Electrification Facility s District Cumulative Target Cumulative Cumulative Target Cumulative Cumulative Target Cumulative till 2008-09 Achievement till 2008-09 Achievement till 2008-09 Achievement 1 Bastar 167 142 167 142 167 142 2 Bijapur 57 30 57 30 57 30 3 Bilaspur 152 130 152 130 152 130 4 Dantewada 89 69 89 69 89 69 5 Dhamtari 22 20 22 20 22 20 6 Durg 43 34 43 34 43 34 7 Janjgir_Champa 72 72 72 72 72 72 8 Jashpur 59 58 59 58 59 58 9 Kanker 15 10 15 10 15 10 10 Kawardha 53 49 53 49 53 49 11 Korba 89 77 89 77 89 77 12 Korea 52 50 52 50 52 50 13 Mahasamund 22 29 22 29 22 29 14 Narayanpur 32 20 32 20 32 20 15Raigarh 53 45 53 45 53 45 16 Raipur 136 112 136 112 136 112 17 Rajnandgaon 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 18 Surguja 234 219 234 219 234 219 TOTAL 1347 1166 1347 1166 1347 1166 Progress made in 2008-09 Additional No. of ECCK Centres Award to best Learning Remedial No. of No. of teachers Bridge Student Community incentives No. of opened under NPEGEL School/Teacher through Open Teaching Total No. of Children trained on Courses Evaluation Mobilisation ( No. of Girls NGO .s . Dislrict Schools (No. (No. of girls benefiting C'unnilalive covered in gender (No. of Girls (No. of Girls (No. of people involved in Cumulative Target for of girls (^irls Other from NPEGEL Target till ECCE centres Ach.sensitization covered) covered) trained) Uniforms the prog. Achievement 2008-09 covered) covered) incentives 2008-09 1 B astar 0 0 0 167 75 835 800 10581 4367: 14788 800 14788 770 90472 0 9 B ijapur 0 0 0 53 53 265 265 3318 2477 15076 265 15076 618 26371 0 3 B iiaspur 0 0 0 152 h 500 760 9226 6371 20176 760 20176 598 44039 0 4 D aniew ada 0 0 0 96 96 580 480 9451 1056 20450 480 20450 107 35565 0 5 D ham lari 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 D urg 0 0 0 17 17 85 85 1762 2173 19078 85 19078 186 20923 0 7 Janjgir Champa 0 0 0 8 S 40 40 9576 339 19876 40 19876 294 11 105 0 8 Jashpur 0 0 0 30 30 150 150 8461 1018 19476 150 19476 243 19113 0 9 K anker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 K aw ardha 0 0 0 43 43 215 215 4314 945 13756 215 13756 62 19991 0 11 Korha 0 0 0 89 89 t 5 l l 445 13191 200 11319 445 11319 218 48889 0 12 Korea 0 0 0 42 52 210 210 3013 480 19037 210 19037 361 20352 0 oQ 13 M ahasam und 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Narayanpur 0 0 0 22 22 110 145 3876 663 13866 145 13866 212 10530 0 15 R aigarh 0 0 0 30 40 150 150 8456 657 18765 150 18765 169 18345 0 16 R aipur 0 0 0 114 82 701 570 15446 430 19778 570 19778 213 27454 0 17 R ajnandgaon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Surguja 0 0 0 196 88 548 1160 6416 1669 15809 1160 15809 960 98951 0 TOTAL () 0 0 1059 792 4900 5475 J07087 22845 241250 5475 241250 5011 492100 0 KGBV sanctioned Operational Enrolment Enrolment (Social categorywise) Building Status s ' District I II III Total I II III Total I II III Tot^l SC ST OBC Muslims BPL Total Completed In Progress 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 Bastar 12 n 0 12 12 0 0 12 1200 0 0 1200 139 904 96 14 47 1200 1 11 Bijapur 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 500 0 0 500 40 393 67 0 0 500 2 3 3 Bilaspur 9 1 0 10 9 1 0 10 893 50 0 943 327 347 254 15 0 943 5 5 4 Dantewada 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 700 0 0 700 36 541 76 0 47 700 2 5 5 Dhamtari 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 197 0 0 19^ 13 119 65 0 .0 197 1 1 6 Durg 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 250 0 0 250 112 29 87 8 14 250 1 2 7 Janjgii_Champa 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 1304 0 0 1304 184 175 340 1 604 1304 6 1 8 Jashpur 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 300 0 0 3001 20 216 64 0 0 300 1 2 9 Kanker 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 100 0 0 100 11 75 14 0 0 100 0 1 10 Kawardha 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 396 0 0 396 12 361 23 0 0 396 0 4 11 Korba 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 500 0 0 500 47 382 64 7 0 500 3 2 12 Korea 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 400 0 0 400 32 285 72 0 11 400 3 1 13 Mahasamund 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 300 0 0 300 99 105 92 4 0 300 3 0 14 Narayanpur 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 200 0 0 200 12 177 11 0 0 200 1 1 15 Raigarh 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 200 0 0 200 19 138 43 0 0 200 0 2 16 Raipur 6 1 C) 7 6 1 0 7 600 50 0 650 132 300 213 4 1 650 4 3 17 Rajnandgaon 18 Surguja 15 1 0 16 15 1 0 16 r 1459 50 1509 72 1168 243 26 1509 4 12 TOTAL 90 3 0 93 90 3 0 93 9499 150 0 9649 1307 5715 1824 53 750 9649 37 56 PLANNING TABLES (1-25) 'Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Data on Popoulation Population all commuriity Total Population all community Urban Rural S.NO. District Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 1 Bastar 59542 60255 119797 534749 539448 1074197 594291 599703 1193994 2 Bijapur 0 0 0 119366 121231 240597 119366 121231 240597 3 Bilaspur 224339 214390 438729 913617 873906 1787523 1137956 1088296 2226252 4 Dantewada 39536 40476 80012 198026 200852 398878 237562 241328 478890 5 Dhamtari 46993 46591 93584 305531 307476 613007 352524 354067 706591 6 Durg 555935 516374 1072309 861958 876169 1738127 1417893 1392543 2810436 7 Janjgir^Ciiampa 126324 126668 252992 532053 531095 1063148 658377 657763 1316140 8 Jashpur 18181 16063 34244 371620 370698 742318 389801 386761 776562 9 Kanker 15887 15498 31385 308749 310800 619549 324636 326298 650934 V 10 Kawardha 23196 21696 44892 268767 270893 539660 291963 292589 584552 11 Korba 191408 175555 366963 325578 '329282 654860 516986 504837 1021823 12 Korea 92461 82330 174791 208790 202746 411536 301251 285076 586327 13 Mahasamund 48106 46947 95053 446799 448072 894871 494905 495019 989924 14 Narayanpur 3268 3189 6457 50554 51293 101847 53822 54482 108304 Raigarh 15 87309 82147 169456 547288 548785 1096073 634597 630932 1265529 16 Raipur 446903 434459 881362 1104439 1090071 2194509 1551341 1524530 3075871 17 Rajnandgaon 117257 114390 231647 520385 535587 1055972 637642 649977 1287619 18 Surguja 87982 81334 169316 911125 891653 1802778 999107 972987 1972094 Total 2184627 2078362 4262989 ^529394 8500057 17029450 10714020 10578419 21292439 Table-1 Chhattisgarh 2009'10 Data on Popoulation Population - T 1 1 SC ST Minority % o f Density of Sex S.NO. District % of Total % Of Total Total Population Ratio Male Female Total Populatio Male Female Total Male Female Total Population Populati n on 1 Bastar 36464 36699 73163 6.13 498796 501683 1000479 83.79 7910 7768 15678 1.31 91 1013 2 Bijapur 8322 8789 17111 7.11 95973 97621 193594 80.46 396 481 877 0.36 33 1016 3 Bilaspur 254350 242320 496670 22.31 231156 226044 457200 20.54 18362 17533 35895 1.61 274 956 4 Dantewada 6713 7095 13808 2.88 185460 189071 374531 78.21 1558 1640 3198 0.67 44 1016 Dhamtari 5 24438 24956 49394 6.99 91748 93767 185515 26.25 7845 7046 14891 2.11 1730 1004 6 Durg 180331 179180 359511 12.79 172038 176763 348801 12.41 2939 2698 5637 0.20 329 982 7 Janjgir_Champa 145069 144392 289461 21.99 81460 85906 167366 12.72 16781 12735 29516 2.24 358 999 8 Jashpur 22480 22168 44648 5.75 237481 241015 478496 61.62 5098 4199 9297 1.20 122 992 9 Kanker 13640 14237 27877 4.28 181065 183627 364692 56.03 2118 2222 4340 0.67 123 1005 10 Kawardha 37295 37056 74351 12.72 60510 61456 121966 20.86 12305 12554 24859 4.25 138 998 11 Korba 51464 49496 100960 9.88 210373 209516 419889 41.09 12227 15813 28040 2.74 265 974 12 Korea 24604 23601 48205 8.22 131957 128083 260040 44.35 14658 12589 27247 4.65 98 947 . 13 Mahasamund 69041 68644 137685 13.91 139299 140360 279659 28.25 10452 10283 20735 2.09 199 5006 14 Narayanpur 3363 3432 6795 6.27 44710 45969 90679 83.73 431 446 877 0.81 66 1012 15 Raigarh 89395 90349 179744 14.20 222470 225233 447703 35.38 5731 5411 11142 0.88 179 994 16 Raipur 262442 255759 518201 16,85 181423 179556 360979 11.74 61339 57872 119211 3.88 301 14808 17 Rajnandgaon 63344 64580 127924 9.93 167087 175601 342688 26.61 26974 25912 52886 4.11 206 1022 18 Surguja 50205 48815 99020 5.02 551277 542293 1093570 55.45 22021 19925 41946 2.13 158 978 Total 1342960 1321568 2664528 12.51 3484283 3503564 6987847 32.82 229145 217127 446272 2.10 177 987 Source - Census 2001 Chhattisgarh 2009-20 Data on Literacy Literacy rate in percentage Rural Ail Connmunities SC ST Minority Female S.NO. District Literacy IVIale Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Rate 1 Bastar ' 57.70 32.52 45.11 51.29 33.00 42.14 46.24 24.29 35.26 27.25 22.58 24.92 31.25 2 Bijapur 13.00 8.00 11.00 12.00 7.00 10.00 12.00 7.00 9.00 12.00 7.00 16.00 8.00 3 Bilaspur 78.98 48.08 63.68 75.76 42.87 59.32 73.25 43.66 58.46 87.86 71.92 79.89 37.63 4 Dantewada 40.00 24.00 32.00 34.00 19.00 27.00 35.00 19.00 26.00 34.00 22.00 45.00 21.00 5 Dhamtari 86.50 63.40 74.90 69.44 47.78 , 58.49 69.01 46.70 57.73 73.67 52.40 63.04 25.85 6 Durg 59.34 44.63 52.05 55.59 39.63 47.64 47.17 34.04 40.52 58.20 54.60 56.40 49.52 7 Janjgir_Champa 82.21 50.41 66.26 57.70 42.90 60.01 54.41 40.93 47.28 43.89 23.53 33.71 49.29 8 Jashpur 76.34 54.02 65.18 44.08 35.18 39.63 42.86 32.78 37.82 44.75 32.50 45.30 53.62 9 Kanker 82.63 63.30 72.90 37.74 30.21 33.98 49.44 36.81 43.12 83.63 73.30 78.47 54.56 10 Kawardha 76.34 54.02 65.18 44.08 35.18 39.63 42.86 32.78 37.82 44.75 32.50 45.30 53.62 11 Korba 75.98 47.40 61.69 41.79 26.07 33.93 56.99 35.55 46.27 38.23 32.55 35.39 35.00 12 Korea 76.01 50.08 63.44 56.65 40.04 48.34 49.12 36.89 43.01 61.39 52.09 56.39 43.60 13 Mahasamund 75.73 54.34 65.27 20.91 17.17 18.25 25.82 20.32 22.86 17.58 21.74 21.63 44.40 14 Narayanpur 47.91 26.07 36.99 39.47 27.24 33.36 42.09 22.41 32.25 21.50 16.50 19.00 24.95 15 Raigarh 81.62 62.93 72.27 67.67 57.32 62.50 66.38 62.45 64.42 70.47 58.18 64.32 60.82 16 Raipur 82.41 55.30 68.98 64.58 56.31 60.45 70.41 42.30 56.36 58.20 54.60 56.40 51.20 17 Rajnandgaon 87.54 67.92 77.58 76.47 46.15 61.31 73.28 40.23 56.76 64.40 53.16 58.78 66.20 18 Surguja 68.16 42.14 55.15 57.22 36.76 46.99 52.22 31.32 41.77 31.32 26.10 20.87 38.80 Total 78.02 53.04 65.60 56.65 39.99 48.31 56.78 38.09 47.29 54.67 44.20 51.30 46.83 Source - Census 2001 Table-3 Chhattisgarh 2009-20 Basic Indicators S.No. District No. of CD Bloc^ ducational Bloc No.of BRC's No.of CRC's No. of Village No. of Wards slo. of Habitation No. of Panchayat 1 Bastar 167 1168 33 3335 557 12 , 12 2 Bijapur 4 4 53 750 7 2289 155 3 Bilaspur 10 10 152 1622 196 2932 864 604 4 Dantewada 7 7 96 63 2917 249 5 Dhamtari 4 4 81 650 47 913 339 1394 6 Durg 12 12 223 399 2318 995 7 Janjgir_Cliampa 9 9 96 , 915 236 1667 583 Jaslipur 766 8 8 8 88 18 2891 417 9 Kanl 10 Kawardha 4 4 55 949 44 1128 371 11 Korba 5 5 ,89 717 121 2036 352 12 Korea 5 5 70 657 146 1811 250 13 IVIaliasamund 5 5 118 1145 89 1378 492 14 Narayanpur 2 2 22 159 5 377 69 15 Raigarli 9 9 105 1422 203 2666 705 2163 483 16 Raipur 15 15 262 3141 1199 1655 148 1971 695 17 Rajnandgaon 9 9 129 1 18 Surguja 19 19 239 1489 165 5783 907 Total 146 0 146 2169 19305 2421 41500 9588 Source - Census 2001 HABITATIONS AND ACCESS (PRIMARY) Habitations Covered by Habitations without Primary Schools / EGS Habitations Total No. of without Primary S. No. DISTRICT Habitations Habitations No. of Habitations Primary Schools / EQS No. of Children Habitations No. of Children EOS (within eligible for PS not eligible PS Children in Scliooi (within (within 1 KM) in such (Col. 7) not eligible in such (Col. 11) 1 KIVI) as per state but eligible for such (qol. 9) 1 KIVI) Habitations for PS/EGS Habitations norms EGS Habitations 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 Bastar 3335 3168 0 167 0 0 0 0 167 714 2 Bi;apur 22iS9 2142 0 147 0 0 0 0 147 ■ 348 3 Bilaspur 2932 2903 0 29 0 0 0 6 ' 2& 150 4 Dantewada 2917 2810 0 107 0 0 0 0 107 1071 5 Dhamtari 913 913 ^0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 6 Durg 2318 2307 0 11 0 0 0 6 11 221 7 Janjgir Champa 1667 1593 '6 74 0 0 0 0 74 1390 8 Jashpur 2891 2891 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Kanker 1947 1832 0 115 d 6 0 0 115 134 10 Kawardha 1128 1Qlt 0 111 0 0 0 0 111 465 11 Korba 2036 1999 6 37 0 0 0 0 37 0 12 Korea 1811 1811 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 13 Mahasamund 1376 1365 0 13 1 43 0 0 12 547 14 Narayanpur 377 288 0 89^ ! 0 0 0 0 89 540 15 Raiqarh 2666 2666 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 16 Raipur 3141 3141 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Rajnandpaon 1971 1§02 0 69 0 0 0 0 691 307 18 Surguia 5783 5783 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41500 40531 0 969 1 43 0 0 968 5887 Source - Census 2001 Table 4 unnauisgam .iuuy-kJU Access HABITATIONS AND ACCESS (UPPER PRIMARY) 1 No. ot'eliglble No. of No. of schoolless No.of Primary No.of Upper IHabitations Habitations habitations for Primary and No. of UPS Total No. of Schools Primary School S. No. having UPS without UPS UPS as per Upper Primary eligible as per Gap in UPS Habitations (Govt. & (Govt. & Govt. facility in 3 KM facility in 3 distance and Ratio 2:1 ratio Govt Aided) Aided) Area KM area population nnrm« 1 2 4 , 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Bastar 3335 3023 312 142 2853 1116 2.6 1427 311 2 Bijapur 2289 2059 230 0 835 184 4.5 418 234 3 Bilaspur 2932 2932 0 0 2557 1072 2.4 1279 207 4 Dantewada 2917 2639 278 0 1449 349 4.2 725 376 5 Dhamtari 913 913 0 0 90S 452 2.0 454 2 6 Durg 2318 2312 6 0 2306 1157 2.0 1153 0 7 Janjqir Champa 1667 1579 88 0 1625 792 2.1 813 21 8 Jashpur 2891 2891 0 0 1870 517 3.6 935 418 9 Kanker 1947 1748 199 53 1605 551 2.9 803 252 10 Kawardha 1128 1096 33 15 ' 1054 516 2.0 527 11 11 Korba 2036 2014 22 0 1 O T 497 3.2 786 289 12 Korea 1811 1811 0 0 1018 414 2.5 509 95 13 Mahasamund 1378 1365 13 5 1343 475 2.8 672 197 14 Narayanpur 377 308 69 5 417 105 4.0 209 104 15 Raiqarh 2666 2666 0 0 2097 926 2.3 1049 123 16 Raipur 3141 3141 0 0 3103 1572 2.0 1552 0 17 Rainandqaon 1971 1907 64 0 1890 760 2.5 945 185 18 Surquja 5783 5783 0 0 4335 1 1737 2.5 2168 431 TOTAL 41500 40187 1314 220 32837 13192 2.5 16424 3256 Source - Census 2001 Availability of Access For Focus Group s c Population S T Population | Muslim Population Villages with more than 40% Muslim Villages with more than 40% SC popullation Villages with more than 40% S T popullation popullation Villag#s Villages SI. No. Villages Villages without Villages without without Villages No. of without school without UPS No. of Villages school pry. UPS within 3 No. of Villages school Pry. without UPS Villages Pry. School within 3 km School within km School within within 3 km within 1 km. 1 km. 1 km. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Bastar 0 0 0 1168 0 52 0 0 0 2 Bijapur 0 0 0 '756 49 77 0 0 0 3 Bilaspur 163 0 0 213 0 0 3 0 0 4 dantewada 0 0 0 585 80 115 2 0 0 5 Dhamtari 23 0 0 280 0 0 0 0 0 6 Durg 0 6 6 i f 11 0 0 0 0 7 Janjgir Champa 407 Q 0 136 1 1 1 0 0 8 Jashpur 7 0 0 632 0 10 3 0 0 9 Kanker 0 0 0 104'7 0 33 0 0 6 10 Kawardha 213 27 17 '40d 53 20 15 0 0 11 Korba 0 0 0 717 0 40, 0 0 0 12 Korea 3 0 0 5^0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Mahasamund 17d 0 0 133 0 b 2 ...... i . ...0 0 U3 14 Narayanpur 0 0 0 159 52 59 0 ' 0 0 15 Raigarh 604 0 d 922 0 0 0 0 0 16 Raipur 304 0 0 585 0 0 6 0 0 17 Rajnandgaon 66 1 2; 750 31 10 0 0 0 18 Surguia 0 0 0 1135 0 0 7 0 0 T o t a l 1969 28 19 102-i8 277 417 33 0 0 Source - Cens'us 2001 Table 4 Table-5 Chhattisgarh 2009-20 CHILD POPULATION (6-14 AGE GROUP) ALL COMMUNITIES SC (6<11 age group) (6-11 age group) S.No. District Urban Rural Total ' Urban Rural Total B GT B GT B G T B G T B GT B G T 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 Bastar 6023 5805 11828 96797 92749 189546 102820 98554 201374 1004 934 1938 2779 3135 5914 3783 4069 7852 2 Bijapur 4312 2869 7181 24457 25485 49942 28769 28354 57123 264 179 443 1555 1590 3145 1819 1769 3588 3 Bilaspur 30491 28782 59273 142805 131880 274685 173296 160662 333958 7132 6881 14013 33812 31267 65079 40944 38148 79092 4 Dantewada 12099 12082 24181 34198 33303 ^7501 46297 45385 91682 675 689 1364 ,1858 1743 3601 2533 2432 4965 5 Dhamtari 4442 4226 8668 45185 45177 90362 49627 49403 99030 566 486 1052 3578 3552 7130 4144 4038 8182 6 Durg 47993 46469 94459 130755 127598 258353 178745 174067 352812 8746 8624 17370 19884 19718 39602 28630 28342 56972 7 Janjgir_Champa 12651 11141 23792 93741 90109 183850 106392 101250 207642 3115 3011 6126 26223 24968 51191 29338 27979 57317 ,8 Jashpur 2881 2512 5373 51823 49480 101303 54684 51992 106676 368 330 698 3531 3286 6817 3899 3616 7515 9 Kanker 2638 2561 5199 46616 44948 91564 49254 , 47509 967631 235 261 496 2141 2018 4159^ 2376 2279 4655 10Kawardha 3598 4192 7790 57531 54716 112247 61129 58908 120037 662 733 1395 7682 7333 15015 8344 8066 16410 11 Korba 24966 23544 48510 54823 51074 105897 79789 74618 154407 4043 3657 7700 5186 12637 17823 9229 16294 25523 12 Korea 10313 9737 20050 34831 33749 68580 45144 43486 88630 1168 1220 2388 2740 2655 5395 3908 3875 7783 13 Mahasamund 6831 6365 13196 62991 607b4 123785 69822^ 67159 136981 1391 1353 2744 9944 9047 18991 11335 10400 21735 S i 14 Narayanpur 970 967 1937 9076 8605 17681 10046 9572 19618 63 65 128 322 290 612 385 355 740 15 Raigarh 11667 10192 21859 73749 71615 145364 85416 81807 167223 1985 1778 3763 12878 12711 25589 14863 14489 29352 16 Raipur 69052 67404 136456 223467 211807 435274 292519 279211 571730 13481 13250 26731 42130 39937 82067 55611 53187 108798 17 Rajnandgaon 13167 11974 ^5141 81643 81322 162965 94810 93296 188106 1997 1874 3871 7780 11651 19431 9777 13525 23302 18: Surguja 13309 12538 25847 153378 144475 297853 166525 156852 323377 1323 1219 2542 8775 8064 16839 10098 9283 19381 Total 277383 263360 540740 1417866 1358886 2776752 1695084 1622085 3317169 48218 46544 94762 192798 195602 388400 241016 242146 483162 Source - Census 2001 CHILD POPULATION (6-14 AGE GROUP) ST Muslim (6-11 age group) (6-11 age group) S.No. District Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total 1 B G T B G T B G T B G T BGT BG T 1 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 Bastar 1876 1693 3569 70451 65007 135458 72327 66700 139027 535 518 1053 829 840 1669 1364 1358 2722 2 Bijapur '3564 2378 5942 19103 19934 39037 22667 , 22312 44979 17 13 30 76 88 164 93 101 194 3 Bilaspur 3852 2675 6527 31416 30898 62314 35268 33573 68841 227 217 444 883 814 1697 1110 1031 2141 4 Dantewada 7341 7326 14667 23731 23396 47127 31072 30722 61794 153 171 324 132 148 280 285 319 604 5 Dhamtari 609 524 1133 12010 11789 23799 12619 12313 24932 119 121 240 74 76 150 193 197 390 6 Durg 4543 4355 8898 18758 18409 37167 23301 22764 46065 2658 2474 5132 415 460 875 3073 2934 6007 7 Janjgir_Champa 1084 989 2073 13056 11960 25016 14140 12949 27089 170 145 315 271 227 498 441 372 813 8 Jashpur 1401 1254 2655 32578 31470 64056 33979 32732 66711 151 142 293 758 695 1453 909 837 1746 9 Kanker 593 578 1171 26563 25529 52092 27156 26107 532^3 196 124 320 45 35 80 241 159 400 10 Kawardha 689 772 1461 11145 10436 21581 11834 11203 23042 135 136 271 336 355 691 471 491 962 11 Korba 4958 4641 9599 30746 2857i5 59321 35704 33210! 68920 168 227 395 205 227 432 373 454 827 12 Korea 3663 3445 7108 19036 18234 37270 22699 21679 44378 1057 1022 2079 345 280 625 1402 1302 2704 13 Mahasamund 782 758 1540 20269 18513 38782 21051 1927t 40322 514 496 1010 910 966 1876 1424 1462 2886 14 Narayanpur 759 799 1558 7229 6746 13975 7988 7545 15533 25 17 42 69 49 118 94 66 160 15 Raigarh 2276 1982 4258 30807 29959 60766 33083 31941 65024 400 387 787 148 136 284 548 523 1071 16 Raipur 4021 4326 8347 30585 28552 59137 34606 32878 67484 916 866 1782 1414 1336 2750 2330 2202 4532 17 Rajnandgaon 1819 1765 3584 25219 28803 54022 27038 30568 §7606 1367 1322 2689 1323 1307 2630 2690 2629 5319 . 18 Surguja 6131 5793 11924 89124 84309 173433 95255 90102 185357 648 674 1322 2832 2292 5124 3480 2966 6446 Total 49961 46053 96014 511826 492527 1004353 561787 538580 1100367 9456 9072 18528 r 11065 10331 21396 20521 19403 39924 Source - Census 2001 Table-5 Chhattisgarh 2009-20 ALL COMMUNITIES SC (11-14 age group) (11-14 age group) S.No. District Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total B 6 T B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 Bastar 3001 3253 6254 33639 28139 61778 36640 31392 68032 541 515 1056 1048 932 1980 1589 1447 3036 2 Bijapur 1930 1287 3217 10647 10402 21049 12577 11689 24266 99 67 166 426 423 849 525 490 1015 3 Bilaspur 15511 13833 29344 65827 54854 120681 81338 68687 150025 3060 2647 5707 15657 12996 28653 18717 15643 34360 4 Dantewada 5089 5038 10127 16032 15695 31727 21121 20733 41854 361 332 693 783 776 1559 1144 1108 2252 5 Ohamtarl 3198 2876 6074 20987 21662 42649 24185 24538 48723 288 266 554 1627 1748 3375 1915 2014 3929 6 Durg 26670 27062 53732 62224 60435 122659 88894 87497 176391 4225 4311 8536 8472 7933 16405 12697 12244 24941 7 Janjgir_Champa 6402 6015 12417 39784 37420 77204 46186 43435 89621 1645 1446 3091 11246 9883 21129 12891 11329 24220 8 Jashpur 1471 1213 2684 24083 21807 45890 25554 23020 48574 159 140 299 1498 1405 2903 1657 1545 3202 9 Kanker 1272 1297 2560 19363 19014 38377 20635 20311 40946 181 188 369 952 939 1891 1133 1127 2260 10 Kawardha 4262 4394 8656 22113 15480 37593 26400 19838 46238 720 780 1500 3520 2754 6274 4240 3534 7774 11 Korba 11568 10908 22476 24535 20900 45435 36103 31808 67911 1580 1576 3156 2923 2394 5317 4503 3970 8473 12 Korea 4950 4652 9602 16824 15070 31894 21774 19722 41496 677 678 1355 1349 1161 2510 2026 1839 3865 13 Mahasamund 4623 3737 8360 29610 27295 56905 34233 31032 65265 849 810 1659 4779 4422 9201 5628 5232 10860 14 Narayanpur 768 752 1520 2482 1913 4395 3250 2665 5915 38 33 71 122 108 230 160 141 301 15 Ralgarh 6693 6082 12775 33479 30387 63866 40172 36469 76641 1229 1051 2280 5768 5157 10925 6997 6208 13205 16 Raipur 31684 34986 66670 96967 84149 181116 128651 119135 247786 5389 5649 11038 18738 16966 35704 24127 22615 46742 17 Rajnandgaon 7507 6978 14485 12705 37154 35369 44661 42347 87008 1073 1036 2109 3566 3483 7049 4639 4519 9158 1 18 Surguja 6630 5778 12408 61491 55161 116652 68121 60939 129060 566 486 1052 3484 3200 6684 4050 3686 7736 Total 143229 1E+05 283370 692792 556937 1E+06 760495 695257 1455752 22680 22011 44691 85958 76680 2E+05 108638 98691 207329 Source - Census 2001 ST Muslim (11-14 age group) (11-14 age group) ' ...... ■ ■ - " '1 " S.No. D istrict Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total BG TB G T BGT B G TB G T ,1 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 Bastar 976 1077 2053 22812 18767 41579 23788 1 19844 43632 330 314 644 968 811 1779 1298 1125 2423 2 Bijapur 1603 1065 2668 8986 8765 17751 10589 9830 20419 7 6 13 39 46 85 46 52 98 3 Bilaspur 1575 1408 2983 13647 1*1570 25217 15222 12978 28200 116 103 219 413 343 756 529 446 975 4 Dantewada 3043 3010 6053 10876 10671 21547 13919 13681 27600 79 78 157 71 73 144 150 151 301 5 Dhamtari 341 310 , 651 5498 5483 10981 5839 5793 11632 80 69 149 274 293 567 354 362 716 6 Durg 2271 2292 4563 9863 10083 19946 12134 12375 24509 1476 1494 2970 295 307 602 1771 1801 3572 7 Janjgir_Champa 523 461 984 5503 5173 10676 6026 5634 11660 77 73 150 182 157 339 259 230 489 8 Jashpur 971 907 1878 14518 13319 27837 15489 14226 29715 52 59 111 396 367 763 448 426 874 9 Kanl 10 Kawardha 702 581 1283 4414 3295 7709 5116 3876 8992 140 150 290 271 278 549 411 428 839 11 Korba 2232 2247 4479 12133 10052 22185 14365 12299 26664 160 179 339 174 184 358 334 363 697 12 Korea 1024 945 1969 8501 7555 16056 9525 8500 18025 540 482 1022 239 234 473 779 716 1495 13 Mahasamund 795 743 1538 9008 8646 17654 9803 9389 19192 232 193 425 599 463 1062 831 656 1487 14 Narayanpur 272 261 533 2247 1818 4065 2519 2079 4598 19 12 31 53 46 99 72 58 130 15 Raigarh 1307 1112 2419 11973 10977 22950 13280 12089 25369 229 236 465 128 117 245 357 353 710 16 Raipur 2245 2348 4593 13218 11780 24998 15463 14128 29591 472 466 938 723 723 1446 1195 1189 2384 17 Rajnandgaon 799 763 1562 11014 10457 21471 11813 11220 23033 617 574 1191 761 757 1518 1378 1331 2709 18 Surguja 2278 2062 4340 33678 30226 63904 35956 32288 68244 417 357 774 917 793 1710 1347 1150 2484 Total 23388 2 2 0 2 2 45410 208163 188579 396742 231551 210601 442152 5181 4981 10162 6543 6359 12902 11737 13616 Source - Census 2001 Chhattisgarti 2009-10 ENROLMENT AND OUT OF SCHOOL CHILDREN (6-14 age group) Enrolment (6-11 age group) Out of School Children (6-11 age group) All Communities s c ST Muslim a m Communities SC ST Muslim % o f % 0 f % 0 f S.No. District % o f SC ST Mus T B T T B B Q T Child BQ T B GT B 0 T BG 0 BG Child Child Child Pop. Pop. Pop. Pop. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 s 10 11 12 13 1 14 16 1« 17 18 20 21 22 23 , 24 25 28 28 29 ..3.0_.„ 1 Bastar 102716 98444 201160 358C 3809 7389 7227S 66657 13893e 1624 T124M 2864 3314 336( 6674 3.32 31C 296 606 8.2 2623 2657 528q 3,8 185 112 297 10,4 2 26964 26450 53414 1567 1514 3081 ■ 21509 ■— 2 ^3 3 42642 91 lOfl 198 4107 448- 8591 16.08 375 440 815 26.5 3134 3312 644S 15,1 __2T 31 58 29.3 l3 i i S " " ■ " ■ 172621 15990C 332521 4080S 37996 78805 3512< 33393 1104 102;^ 2128 675 76! 1437 0.43 135 152 0.4 144 18C 324 0,5 6 9 15 0.7 4 Danlewada______43568 88376 ...... S o l 2239 4642 3001 ( 59S2S 252 2W 54C 3885 454t 8425 9.53 32C 397 717 15,4 2783 3133 ..... SB18 — U ?4 22 46 8.5 ^ 5 4934S 49204 98553 4103 4010 8113 12502 122'o3 247^05 19: 197 390 278 191 47T 0.4® 41 28 ?? o.» 117 110 227 0.9 2 3 5 1.3 ~ f «" g Dura 178018 173266 351284 2841 ( 28123 56542 23192 22632 45824 306S 292S 5994 727 ?6' 1528 0.43 211 219 4?o 0.? 109 132 241 0,5 8 10 18 0.3 7 Janiair Chamoa 106301 101170 207471 29308 27963 57271 14122 12930 27052 43 370 808 91 8( 171 0.08 3C 16 46 0.1 18 19 37 0,1 0 0 C 0.0 6 JashDur 54388 51703 106089 ...... '3876 3589 "■ " 7 4 6 5 33762 32519 66281 90S 83( 1735 298 28S 587 0.55 23i 27 ?0 0.7 ?17 213 43C o,e 4 r 11 0.6 9 Kanker 48759 47028 95787 232! 26841 2581! 53»i8 241 159 400 495 481 i>7( 1.02 47 46 95 V 310 295 , , 1,1 P 0 0 ,0-<3 10 Kawardha 58696 119694 8315 8030 16345 11803 1113! ■ ■ &93« 447 461 908 ■ 872 1156 2028 1.6S 234 303 537 3.3 261 362 623 2,7 29 48 77 8.5 11 korba 7 ^ t 74568 154307 9221 8581 17810 is7o< 3321( 68920 34S 4ie 765 988 1221 220S 1,4: 115 123 ??8 1.3 417 494 911 1,: 60 109 169 22.1 12 Korea 45142 43482 8M24 39oe 3973 7781 22697 ' 2187i 4437< 140a 1302 27(M 234 231 465 0.52 26 30 ?? 0,7 120 114 234 0,5 0 0 0 0.0 13 Mahasamund 69340 66645 135985 11221 102+1 21492 2089 1910! 40000 584 SOS 1089 482 " 514 99^ ,0.73 114 129 ?43 1.1 160 162 322 0,8 1 e 13 1.2 U Naravancur 9999 955S 19554 383 354 737 7948 7535 15483 9i 67 i^2 8 p 829 168< 8.62 75 67 14? 19.3 710 692 1402 9,1 12 7 19 11.7 15 Raioarti 85358 81760 I67H 8 14855 14481 2933e 33062 J1917 6497! '■542 512 592 582 1174 0.70 106 83 189 0,6 321 148 669 1,0 6 11 17 1.6 16 RalDur 291547 278256 569803 55312 52947 108259 34327 M60Q 66927 2322 2196 4518 972 1927 0.3i 299 240 539 , 9-5 279 278 557 0,8 8 6 14 0.3 17 Ralnandaaon 94798 93289 188087 9777 9671 19448 •■’i m 53900 2681 2621 S302 ...... 318 ' 29: 611 0.3i 4C 46 86 0,4 105 9^ . .0.,^ 9 8 17 0.3 18 Surauia 166500 156818 323318 10093 9274 193671 95239 90087 18532e 3424 2893 6317 1993 2175 4168 1.29 184 224 ' 2.1 1139 1238 2377 1.3 56 7^ 12S 2,0 Total 1687343 1613802 3301145 239487 228956 4684431 558067 530930 1088987 1975S 18115 37874 21178 22952 44130 1.34 2685 2868 5553 1,2 12967 13836 26803 2,5 443 462 905 2,4 2.051 48.88613 Enrolment (11-14 age group) Out of School Children (11-14 age group) All Communities SC S T Muslim Ail Communities SC ST Muslim S.No. District % o r % 0 f ^ A o f % o r B 0 T a G TB G TB 0 T B G T Child B GT SC B G T ST B G T Mus nhiirt r.hiirt r h i w 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 t 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 1 ( 17 18 1*. 20 21 22 23 24 28 26 27 28 29 30 1 Baatar 36578 31364 67942 1588 1446 3034 23749 19829 43578 1428 1238 2666 1185 1187 2372 3.49 109 114 223 7.4 925 9 2 « 1854 4.3 108 81 189 7.1 2 Bijapur 11240 10607 21847 314 267 581 9759 9259 19018 46 48 94 3079 2619 5698 26.08 327 305 632 108.8 2123 173« 38S9 20.3 9 18 19.1 3 BUaipur 80971 68272 1492431 18645 1SS63 34208 15144 1287B 28023 527 442 969 367 415 782 0.52 72 80 152 0.4 78 9fl 177 0,6 2 6 0.6 4 Danlewada 19423 18672 38095 926 841 1767 12990 12638 25628 127 125 252 4317 4674 8991 23,60 383.77 447.16 830.93 47.0 2570.82 2607.1S 5178 202 15 19 34 13.5 5 Dhamlari 24063 24433 48496 1902 1994 3896 5771 5747 11518 354 362 716 122 105 227 0.47 13 20 33 0.8 68 49 114 1,0 3 5 0.7 6 Duffl 88376 8««96 175372 12568 12103 24671 12064 12284 24348 1767 1796 3563 518 , 501 1019 0,58 129 141 270 1.1 70 9l| 161 0,7 4 10 0.3 0,1 0 0.0 7 Janjgir_Champa 46160 43423 89583 12872 11336 24208 6022 5630 11652 259 230 489 26 12 38 0,04 7 3 10 0.0 4 1 8 0 8 Jashpur 25280 22787 48067 1632 1438 3070 15283 14054 29337 443 421 864 274 233 507 1,05 25 27 52 1.7 206 172 378 1,3 5 10 1.2 9 Kanker 20333 20006 40339 1076 1072 2148 10564 10243 20807 189 175 364 302 305 607 1.50 57 55 112 5.2 141 12 J 270 1,3 0 0 0.0 10 Kavvardha 28167 19572 45739 4196 3476 7672 5089 3831 8920 405 415 820 485 621 1106 2.42 109 150 259 3.4 96 143^ 239 2,7 17 11 28 3,4 11 Korbe 36077 31769 67846 4503 3970 8473 14365 12299 26664 308 339 647 401 492 893 1.32 42 56 98 1.2 159 184 343 1,3 17 21 38 5,9 12 Korea 21575 19402 40977 1993 1797 3790 9480 856S 18049 779 716 1495 202 185 387 0.94 22 19 41 1.1 102 9 « 200 1.1 0 0 0,0 13 Mahaumund 34022 30825 64847 5562 5165 10727 9366 9027 18393 334 285 619 211 207 418 0.64 66 67 133 1.2 56 55j 111 0,6 9 17 2,7 14 Narayanpur 3239 2652 5891 160 141 301 2508 2076 4584 79 64 143 487 404 891 15.12 3:^ 27 64 21.3 402 34J 746 16,3 ia 12 31 21,7 15 Ralgath 40148 36442 ’ 76590 6993 620fi 13199 13272 12077 2S349 352 347 699 281 24« 529 0.69 33 36 69 0.5 148 11Z 260 1,0 5 11 1,6 16 Raipur 128028 118448 246476 23976 22429 46405 15298 13961 29259 1668 1570 3238 623 687 1310 0.53 151 186 337 0.7 165 167^ 332 1,1 0 0 0,0 17 Rajnandgaon 44656 42327 86983 4639 4519 9158 11809 11204 23013 23013 137(^ 24383 347 354 701 0.81 ■ 73 74 147 1,6 98 11» 213 0.9 8 15 0,1 18 Surguja 68099 60909 129008 4050 3686 7733 35947 32272 68219 1403 1176 2579 906 842 1 1748 1.35 92 97 189 2,4 482 43d 912 1.3 41 54 95 3,7 Total 754435 688906 1443341 107595 97449 205044 228480 207879 436359 33481 11119 44600 14133 14091 28224 1.96 1747.77 1904.16 3652 1,8 7893.8 74611 153is5 3.5 262 245 507 1.1 Source - House Hold Survey updatton 2008-09 Table - 7 Jnformatio Planning for Out of School Children (6-14 years qtge group) Status Age wise break up of O Q S C 8 Never Enrolled NO District 6-8 years 8-11 years 11-14 years Boys______Girls Total Boys Qirls Total Boys Girls Total 1 Bastar 71 72 143 33 38 71 62 28 90 2 Bijapur 1212 593 1805 589 1315 1904 . 1337 . 1082 2419 3 Bilaspur 3 2 5 0 0 0 10' l f 21 4 Dantewada 887 602 1489 733 '1084 1817 1698 2061 3759 5 Dhamtari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Durg 37 44 81 79 73 152 ’ 111 1V1 222 7* Janjgir_Champa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Jashpur 5 6 10 4 4 8 11 4 15 9 Kanker 34 38 72 29 19 48 21 25 46 10 Kawardha 6 6 12 125 206 331 233 266 499 11 Korba 23 20 43 15 34 18 17 35 12 Korea 1 0 _____ 1 1 4 5 0 1 1 13 Mahasamund 19 • 15 34 14 17 31 18 16 34 J 4 ' Narayanpur 31 14 45 16 3 19 11 13 24 15 Raigarh , 27 25 52 31 22 53 24 27 51 'IS Raipur 56 42 98 75 61 136 81 86 167 17 Rajnandgaon ' 7 » 4' 11 5 ^ '"3 5 20 ^ 25 18 Surpuja ' 11 7 " 18 14' '27 41 22 30 52 Total 2430 1489 ^ 3919 1767 2891 4658 3662 3798 7460 Source - House Hold Survey ypdation 2008-09 Table - 7 Informatio Planning for Out of School Children (6-14 years age group) Status Age wise break up of O O SC S. Drop Out NO District 6-8 years 8-11 years 11-14 years Grand total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total 1 Bastar 1990 2015 4005 1220 1235 2455 1123 1159 2282 4499 4547 9046 2 Bijapur 1544 758 2302 799 1781 2580 1742 1537 3279 7223 7066 14289 3 Bilaspur 403 455 858 269 305 574 357 404 761 1042 1177 2219 4 Dantewada 1447 949 2396 1063 1660 2723 2619 2613 5232 8447 8969 17416 ! 5 Dhamtari 78 80 158 188 131 319 122 105 227 388 316 704 6 Durg 104 94 198 507 590 1097 407 390 797 1245 1302 2547 7 Janjgir_Champa 48 20 68 43 60 103 26 12 38 117 92 209 8 Jashpur 23 28 51 266 252 518 263 229 492 572 522 1094 9 Kanker 97 102 199 335 322 667 281 280 561 797 786 1583 10 Kawardha 159 182 341 582 762 1344 252 355 607 1357 1777 3134 11 Korba 506 607 1113 440 579 1019 383 475 858 1389 1713 3102 12 Korea 59 58 117 173 169 342 202 184 386 436 416 852 13 Mahasamund 211 222 433 238 260 498 193 191 384 693 721 1414 14 Narayanpur 502 504 1006 308 308 616 476 391 867 1344 1233 2577 15 Raigarh 242 242 484 292 293 585 257 221 478 873 830 1703 16 Raipur 213 216 429 628 636 1264 542 601 1143 1595 1642 3237 17 Rajnandgaon 109 90 199 197 196 393 342 334 676 665 647 1312 18 Surguja 699 817 1516 1269 1324 2593 884 812 1696 2899 3017 5916 Total 8434 7439 15873 8817 10863 19680 10471 10293 20764 35581 36773 72354 Source - House Hold chhattlsgarh 2009-10 Number of OOSC with Reasons No.of out of No. of out of school children with reason school Non flexibility House Earning Socio S.No. District children as per Lack of Lack of Migratio in school hold compulsi Failure cultural Others household interest Access n timing and work on reasons survey system of 1 Bastar 9046 377 250 2254 133 4376 1356 274 26 0 2 Bijapur 14289 622 138 597 59 120 346 0 507 11900 3 Bilaspur 2219 181 6 1062 49 648 17 86 50 120 4 Dantewada 17416 1210 594 1353 126 183 ' 799 0 839 12312 Dhamtari 5 ' 704 30 0 531 41 0 90 12 0 0 6 Durg 2547 935 48 448 356 133 512 10 0 105 7 Janjgir_Champa 209 17 0 103 72 2 3 3 9 0 8 Jashpur 1094 35 0 932 36 22 10 37 0 22 9 Kanker 1583 552 384 289 0 132 129 72 0 25 10 Kawardha 3134 376 889 148 238 1248 113 78 15 29 11 Korba 3102 3102 1 12 Korea 852 154 0 597 0 0 101 0 0 0 13 Mahasamund 1414 124 113 479 170 114 191 100 18 105 14 Narayanpur 2577 107 51 729 0 1210 385 79 16 0 15 Raigarh 1703 377 0 735 238 71 123 61 56 42 I 16 Raipur 3237 576 0 1006 250 284 532 276 214 99 17 Rajnandgaon 1312 0 15 395 316 321 86 16 5 158 18 Surguja 5916 476 0 3947 22E 725 139 293 0 110 Total 72354 6149 2488 15605 . 2310 12691 4932 1397 1755 25027 Source - House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Chhattisgarti 2009-10 COVERAGE OF OUT OF SCHOOL CHILDREN UNDER DIFFERENT STRATEGIES No. of Children to be enrolled in other Strategy No. of Out of Schoi Ctilldren propoed to be covered under diff#rent strategies In the Next Year (pi. specify) No. of Total Block/ Municipal No. of OoSC No. of Children No. of No. of No. of Children to S. No. No. of No. of N ig h t No. of Total Area as per HHS to be directly Children to No. of EGS Children to Children to No. o fR B C be enrolled Shelter for D o o rm ito r NRBC Madarsa/ HBE S am tulyata Childre No. of enrolled In be enrolled Centre be enrolled be enrolled Centre in U rb a n y Centre Maktab n to be Centers School In EGS in NRBC In R BC Madarsa/Mak dep rive d enrolled tab 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 1 B a s ta r 9 0 4 6 1 7 4 3 0 0 5 7 0 2 6 6 5 3 3 13 0 0 0 5 0 1 5 0 9 0 4 6 2 B ija p u r . 1 4 2 8 9 1 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 0 191 5 0 9 9 8 3 3 B iia s p u r 2 2 1 9 2 6 0 0 1 7 2 3 7 5 3 7 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 9 4 D a n te w a d a 1 7 4 1 6 2 20 1 0 0 0 0 9 8 0 7 13 4 5 2 1 2 0 6 0 5 D h a m ta ri 7 0 4 5 4 0 0 0 0 600 52 0 050 704 6 D u rg 2 5 4 7 2 1 0 0 0 1 9 3 7 9 3 3 5 0 7 0 0 5 0 2 5 4 7 7 Janjgir_Champa 2 0 9 3 2 0 0 4 3 1 8 4 2 0 0 50 2 0 9 8 J a s h p u r 10 9 4 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 7 5 8 21 0 0 50 2 2 1 0 9 4 9 K a n k e r 1 5 8 3 8 9 8 0 0 261 24 1 6 9 12 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 5 1 5 8 3 10 K a w a rd h a 3 1 3 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 7 9 7 6 7 0 0 50 233 4 3134 11 K o rb a 3 1 0 2 1 4 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 6 3 3 1 00 0 0 50 3 1 0 2 12 K o re a 8 5 2 4 4 5 0 0 1 7 0 9 1 8 0 7 0 0 5 0 7 8 5 2 13 M a h a s a m u n d 1 4 1 4 3 5 0 0 0 3 9 8 12 6 1 6 15 0 0 5 0 14 1 4 14 N a ra y a n p u r 2 5 7 7 0 0 0 1 5 9 7 2 3 7 0 113 0 0 4 8 1 2 5 7 7 15 R a ig a rh 1 7 0 3 7 6 2 0 0 4 8 7 58 3 6 2 18 0 0 5 0 4 2 1 7 0 3 16 R a ip u r 3 2 3 7 2 0 8 8 0 0 2 5 0 5 7 5 0 16 9 0 0 5 0 9 9 3 2 3 7 17 Rajnandgaon 13 1 2 0 0 0 4 6 2 7 4 7 2 0 0 5 0 7 5 3 131 2 18 S u rg u ja 5 9 1 6 8 1 4 0 0 1 0 7 8 3 8 3 6 6 4 134 0 0 50 2 0 0 1 1 0 5 9 1 6 Total 7 2 3 5 4 14419 0 0 7538 355 3 7 9 6 0 1 1 8 2 0 0 7 5 0 6 3 3 289 753 62692 Source • House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 CONTINUING CENTERS FROM PREVIOUS YEAR VO & Source - House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Table - 10 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Data on GER , NER ; Cohort Drop-out, and all Over Repetion Rate Children 6-11 age group Children 11-14 age group S.NO. District Cohort Overall Cohort Overall GER NER GER NER Drop-out Repetition Drop-out Repetition 1 Bastar 104.85 99.89 4.27 5.32 103.65 99.87 8.24 11.76 2 Bijapur 79.00 94.00 40.00 71.00 41.00 90.00 15.00 49.00 3 Bilaspur 111.33 99.57 12.96 2.82 110.89 99.48 9.39 5.09 4 Dantewada 97.06 96.39 41.00 78.00 91.52 91.02 88.96 64.00 5 Dhamtari 104.95 99.52 4.52 4.92 101.44 99.53 6.36 6.04 6 Durg 102.37 99.74 5.16 9.78 102.08 99.57 7.96 11.06 7 Janjgir_Champa 103.41 99.86 3.11 8.27 105.52 99.94 2.93 5.59 8 Jashpur 111.05 99.45 11.87 6.72 104.44 98.96 7.39 10.33 9 Kanker 101.68 98.99 5.81 9.61 98.30 98.52 4.69 14.36 10 Kawardha 100.42 99.71 2.81 7.19 99.75 98.92 2.46 2.49 11 Korba 100.11 99.94 8.89 4.88 100.80 99.90 11.64 8.69 12 Korea 111.31 99.99 1.58 0.94 114.30 98.01 3.20 3.48 13 Mahasamund 101.66 99.27 3.43 1.85 101.64 99.36 3.45 2.01 14 Narayanpur 103.71 99.67 6.35 7.32 103.58 99.59 16.22 14.14 15 Raigarh 103.17 99.94 4.70 10.80 102.80 99.93 3.74 12.73 16 Raipur 101.91 99.66 2.58 3.00 100.35 99.47 2.01 1.00 17 Rajnandgaon 103.09 99.99 10.86 8.44 101.50 99.97 8.51 6.66 18 Surguja 104.97 99.98 2.66 1.37 100.91 99.91 3.21 2.47 State 102.56 99.20 9.59 13.43 99.14 98.44 11.41 12.83 Source - House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Data on completion rates primary gradutes and transition Transition Rate from S.NO. District Completion Rate No.of Primary Gradutes primary to upper primary 1 Bastar 95.73 19596 85.20 2 Bijapur 37.00 4297 50.00 3 Bilaspur 86.68 64726 1 95.78 4 Dantewada 38.00 8237 56.00 5 Dhamtari 93.88 17799.04 97.62 6 Durg 82.69 53198 99.24 7 Jan]gir_Champa 91.73 33477 ' 100.30 8 Jashpur 92.28 12852 95.35 9 • Kanker 90.39 19440 94.04 10 Kawardha 93.90 13453 99.19 11 Korba 88.34 , 5972.8 98.87 12 Korea 94.50 14266 97.55 13 Mahasamund 97.31 25300 99.29 ( 14 Narayanpur 95.17 1571 83.58 15 Raigarh 90.73 24064 96.19 16 Raipur 94.89 86075 96.90 17 Rajnandgaon 88.30 30532 101.79 18 Surciuja 86.89 44591 96.45 Total 87.14 479447 93.89 Source - House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Table-12 Community Training Chhattisgarh No of' No of Total Community No of schools Community Name of Block/ Community S. No. No. of villages Member (Govt arid Member Municipal Area members for 1 Eleligible(@ 4 Aided) Eleligible per Village) (@ 2 per School) Training 1 2 6 1 Bastar ' 1168 4672 3,969 7,938 12,610 2 Bijapur 750 3000 1,019 2,038 5,038 3 Bilaspur 1622 6488 3,629 7,258 13,746 4 Dantewada 604 2416 1,798 3,596 6,012 5 Dhamtari 650 1 1,360 2,720 5,320 V3 2600 O- 6 Durg 1394 5576 3,463 6,926 12,502 7 Janjgir_Champa 915 3660 2,417 4,834 8,494 8 Jashpur 766 3064 2,387 4,774 7,838 9 Kanker 1080 4320, 2,156 4,312 8,632 10 . Kawardha 949 3796 1,570 3,140 6,936 11 Korba 717 2868 2,069 4,138 7,006 12 Korea 657 2628 1,432 2,864 5,492 13 Mahasamund 1145 4580 1,818 3,636 8,216 14 Narayanpur 159 636 522 1,044 1,680 15 Raigarh 1422 5688 3,023 6,046 11,734 16 Raipur 2163 8652 4,675 9,350 18,002 17 Rajnandgaon 1655 6620 2,650 5,300 11,920 18 Surguja 1489 5956 6,0^2 12,144 18,100 Total 19305 77220 46,029 92,058 169,278 Source:Census 2001 and BRC Reports and Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Data on Schools Primary Schools Upper Primary Schools Total V 3 U V I. ■ Unaided Unaided Govt, Unaided Govt, includi Gov. Total Net S.NO. District Gov. Private Gov. Private includin Private Existing including Total ng r M f u u Total aide u i i i e Primary 2:1 Ratio entitleme aided aided g local Recog UPS local bodies local cogn d cogni Schools nt of UPS gnize cog gnize bodies f------1 ! nized 1 Bastar 2828 25 48 0 2901 1105 11 28 0 1144 3933 36 76 0 2853 1427 1116 311 2 Bijapur 829 6 14 0 849 182 2 5 0 189 1011 8 19 0 835 418 184 234 3 Bilaspur 2531 26 280 57 2894 1056 16 199 24 1295 3587 42 479 81 2557 1279 1072 207 4 Dantewada 1436 13 24 8 1481 343 6 16 0 365 1779 19 40 8 1449 725 349 376 Dhamtari 5 903 5 155 0 1063 448 4 88 0 540 1351 9 243 0 908 454 452 2 6 Durg 2296 10 531 88 2925 1146 11 305 33 1495 3442 21 836 121 2306 1153 1157 0 7 Janjgir_Champa 1619 6 254 0 1879 790 2 163 0 955 2409 8 417 0 1625 813 792 21 8 Jashpur 1789 81 121 6 1997 477 40 82 1 600 2266 121 203 7 1870 935 517 418 9 Kanker 1599 6 95 0 1700 550 1 51 0 602 2149 7 146 0 1605 803 551 252 10 Kawardha 1046 8 99 0 1153 516 0 62 0 578 1562 8 161 0 1054 527 516 11 11 Korba 1555 17 182 0 1754 494 3 121 0 618 2049 20 303 0 1572 786 497 289 12 Korea 1003 15 121 3 1142 411 3 108 0 522 1414 18 229 3 1018 509 414 95 13 Mahasamund 1318 25 155 4 1502 469 6 85 2 562 1787 31 240 6 1343 672 475 197 14 Narayanpur 404 13 12 0 429 98 7 6 0 111 502 20 18 0 417 209 105 104 15 Raigarh 2083 14 188 0 2285 917 9 130 0 1056 3000 23 318 0 2097 1049 926 123 16 Raipur 3030 73 500 59 3662 1550 22 374 0 1946 4580 95 874 59 3103 1552 1572 -20 17 Rajnandgaon 1886 4 191 0 2081 758 2 139 0 899 2644 6 330 0 1890 945 760 185 18 Surguja 4302 33 303 0 4638 1717 20 204 0 1941 6019 53 507 0 4335 2168 1737 431 State 32457 380 3273 225 363315 13027 165 2166 SO 15418 45484 545 5439 285 32837 16424 13192 3236 Source - House Hold Survey updation 2008-09 Table14 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 TEACHERS (PRIMARY SCHOOUPRIMARY SECTION) Teachers In Government Aided Teachers in Government Schools Schools % 0 f Total no. of S.No. Female Primary + Prim ary + Primary Primary + P rim a ry+ ' Teachers District Primary Alone Teachers Middle Secondary Alone Middle Secondary 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 Bastar 5704 864 20 80 26 0 6694 26 2 Biiapur 1537 0 0 29 0 0 1566 27 3 BllasDur 8423 0 0 61 37 17 8538 29 4 Dantewada 2697 0 0 35 21 0 2753 31 5 Dhamtari 2677 0 0 44 0 0 2721 39 6 Dura 8250 13 0 1 42 10 0 8315 32 7 Janiqir Champa 4636 0 0 19 8 0 4663 33 8 Jashpur 3742 0 0 229 48 19 4038 37 9 Kanker 3473 81 28 12 0 0 3594 27 10 Kawardha 2744 0 0 33 0 0 2777 27 0 11 Korba 3630 0 0 42 20 0 3692 28 12 Korea 2070 0 0 68 0 0 2138 30 13 Mahasamund 2681 0 0 65 t 0 0 2746 34 14 Naravanpur 276 93 19 5 28 0 421 8 15 Raigarh 4263 40 0 42 0 0 4345 27 16 Raipur 10874 0 0 126 86 0 11086 34 17 Ralnandqaon 5014 0 1 0 26 0 0 5040 31 18 Surguia 8283 13 0 106 17 0 8419 31 TOTAL 80974 1104 67 1064 301 36 83546 30 Source: Planning data 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 REQUIREMENT OF ADDITIONAL TEACHER (PRIMARY) Name of District Teachers in Primary Schools Entitlement of S in g le S tu d e n ts Sanctioned Post® W o rk in g Entitlement Entitlement Teachers P T R w .r.t. P T R w .r.t. T e a c h e r S .N o D is tr ic t Enrolment in of A d d l. of Teachers minimum as per 2 S a n ctio n e d W o rk in g Schools after Govt. Primary U n d e r Te a c h e rs at 1:40 ratio teachers in each U n d e r P osts P o sts Rationalizatio S c h o o ls B y State Total By State To ta l for Primary school 1 ’ SSA SSA n 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 1 4 15 1 Bastar 2 0 1 9 4 0 5 0 4 9 5 8 7 6 7521 2 1 2 3 9 6 4 4 4 4 1 0 2 1 7 8 6 5 8 8 2 1 31 5 7 6 0 2 Bijapur 4 3 1 5 7 1 0 7 9 16 5 8 15 2 4 5 5 2 2 0 7 6 10 1 8 5 1 9 1 5 3 7 2 1 2 8 4 5 0 3 Bilaspur 30 5 7 0 1 7 6 4 3 5 0 6 2 7 3 8 6 3 5 8 3 1 0 9 6 9 484 1 3 5 8 2 8 4 2 3 2 8 3 6 0 0 4 Dantewada 7 7 7 3 8 1 9 4 4 2 8 7 2 2361 ' 113 4 3 4 9 5 1 5 9 8 10 9 9 2 6 9 7 2 2 2 9 142 0 5 Dhamtari 9 9 0 3 0 2 4 7 6 18 0 6 2 7 8 2 7 2 8 3 5 1 0 1960 717 2677 2 8 3 7 0 0 6 Durg 2 8 9 4 8 8 7 2 3 8 6 8 8 8 7 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 9 4 2 5 6 1 2 4 2 1 3 9 8 2 6 3 31 3 5 0 0 7 Janjgir_Champa 1 7 1 4 5 7 4 2 8 7 3 2 3 8 3 1 7 2 2 1 3 5 5 3 0 7 2 4 9 9 2 1 3 7 4 6 3 6 32 3 7 190 0 8 Jashpur 8 2 2 2 5 2056 3578 3994 1373 5 3 6 7 24 0 1 1341 3 7 4 2 15 2 2 0 9 Kanker 8 9 6 1 0 22 4 1 3 2 0 0 3 5 9 5 1 2 0 5 4 8 0 0 2 3 7 9 12 0 3 3 5 8 2 19 2 5 0 10 Kawardha 1 0 4 4 0 0 2 6 1 0 2 6 1 0 3 1 4 8 9 7 6 4 1 2 4 18 5 4 8 9 0 2 7 4 4 2 5 r 38 3 8 0 7 0 11 Korba 1 3 2 3 3 7 330$ 3110 2509 1 1 8 8 3 6 9 7 1 2 4 4 2 11 8 8 3 6 3 0 3 6 3 6 80 0 1 2 Korea 6 7 0 1 1 1 6 7 6 2 0 0 6 2361 6 4 8 3 0 0 9 1 4 7 3 5 9 7 2 0 7 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 13 M ahasam und 1 1 6 6 8 4 2 9 1 8 2 6 3 6 3 0 3 0 7 1 4 3 7 4 4 1967 714 2681 31 4 4 0 14 Narayanpur 1 9 2 4 0 481 8 3 4 3 8 9 3 1 5 700 311 77 388 2 7 5 0 14 3 0 1 5 Ralgarh 1369251 3424 416^ 5241 1008 6 2 4 9 3331 9 7 2 4 3 0 3 2 2 3 2 4 4 7 0 16 Raipur 4 3 2 8 3 ^ 10821 6 0 6 0 6 3 5 0 4 7 3 0 11080 6144 4730 1 0 8 7 4 39 4 0 4 0 0 17 Rajnandgaon 1 6 6 1 3 8 4 1 5 4 7 7 8 0 7 0 7 2 7 0 8 7 7 8 0 4 3 6 8 6 4 6 5 0 1 4 2 1 3 3 18 2 0 0 0 1 8 Surguja 2 9 6 7 6 9 7 4 1 9 8 6 0 4 9 4 0 6 3431 1 2 8 3 7 5 3 3 4 2 9 6 2 8 2 9 6 2 3 3 6 TOTAL 2832675 7 0 8 1 7 71984 79150 28663 107813 54454 276Si 82145 26 3 4 5652 0 Table15 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 TEACHERS (UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOUUPPER PRIMARY SECTION) Teachers in Government Teachere in Oovernment Sch o o ls Aided Schools % 0f Total No. of S.N o. Fem ale Upper Primary U p p e r Upper Primary Te achers District Upper Primary Te achers + Secondary Prim ary + Secondary 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Bastar 2880 375 106 0 3361 20 2 Bijapur 708 71 14 0 793 29 3 Bilaspur 4478 495 36 45 5054 35 4 Dantewada 1238 149 21 0 1408 26 5 Dhamtari 1725 82 23 0 1830 24 6 Durg 4819 1034 13 36 5902 30 7 Janjgir Champa 2831 326 8' 10 3175 31 8 Jashpur 1532 75 165 51 1823 30 9 Kanker 1727 517 2 0 2246 25 10 Kawardha 1218 355 0 0 1573 22 11 Korba 2094 0 0 20 2114 29 12 Korea 1183 91 20 0 1294 32 13 Mahasamund 1835 0 36 0 1871 24 14 Narayanpur 191 20 28 0 239 6 15 Raigarh 3022 253 45 0 3320 27 16 Raipur 5320 1161 118 0 6599 40 17 Rajnandpaon 2651 0 29 0 2680 27 18 Surguja 5347 84 79 0 5510 25 TOTAL 44799 5088 743 162 50792 27 Source: Planning data 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 REQUIREMENT OF ADDITIONAL TEACHER Name of District I Teachers in Upper Primaiv Schools entitlement fcrititfe Students UP Schools after District of Sanctioned Posts W orking m ent Enrolment in Entitlement of PTR w.r.t. PTR w.r.t. Rationalization S .N o Te ach ers of Govt. Upper Teachers at Sanctioned W orking S ch o o ls w ith 2 a t 1 Single A ddl. Prim ary 1:40 Ratio State U n d e r S S A Posts Posts Te acher teacher for State UnderSSA Total To ta l taecher Te ach . S ch o o ls ,ey^rv S ch o o l p rs f p r 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Bastar 68848 1722 3348 2248 2601 4849 1258 1997 3255 14 21 36 55 2 Bijapur 10156 254 1092 390 461 851 383 396 779 12 13 0 46 3 Bilaspur 108688 2718 3168 3544 1736 5280 3237 1736 4973 21 22 0 0 4 Dantewada 19985 500 2058 * 780 862 1642 601 786 1387 12 14 0 88 5 Dhamtari 48723 1219 1- Source: Planning data 2008-09 Table 16 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 TRAINED AND UNTRAINED TEACHERS Primary teachers Upper Primary Teachers Untrained Untrained Those Those Those Those S.No District Working who have who have who have Working Teachers Trained %age who have %age Trained* %age not %age not Teachers received Total received Total received received 60 days 1 60 days 60 days 60 days training training trainina trainina 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Bastar 6588 1978 30.0 3966 644 4610 70 3255 372 11.4 1678 1205 2883 89 2 Bijapur 1537 61 4.0 1402 74 1476 96 779 41 5.3 621 117 738 95 3 Bilaspur 8423 4162 49.4 4169 92 4261 51 4973 2195 44.1 2729 49.00 2778 56 4 Dantewada 2697 282 10.5 229^ 118 2415 90 1387 235 16.9 1047 105 1152 83 5 Dhamtari 2677 544 20.3 1069 1044 2133 80 1807 879 48.6 700 228 928 51 6 Durg 8263 4859 58.8 3404 0 3404 41 5853 4786 81.8 1067 0 1067 18 7 Janjgir Champa 4636 2332 50.3 2108 196 2304 50 3157 661 20.9 2372 124 2496 79 8 Jashpur 3742 554 14.8 2076 1112 3188 85 1607 674 41.9 524 409 933 58 9 Kanker 3582 1103 30.8 2386 93 2479 69 2244 1163 51.8 1010 71 1081 48 10 Kawardha 2744 951 34.7 1616 177 1793 65 1573 332 21.1 1117 124 1241 79 11 Korba 3630 636 17.5 2994 0 2994 '82 2094 595 28.4 1499 0 1499 72 12 Korea 2070 678 32.8 1116 276 1392 67 1274 392 30.8 753 129 882 69 13 Mahasamund 2681 249 9.3 2432 0 2432 91 1835 216 11.8 1619 0 1619 88 14 hJ'arayanpur 3^8 164 42.3 ^24 0 224 58 211 73 34.6 138 0 138 65 15 Raigarh 4303 505 11.7 3798 0 3798 88 3275 1647 50.3 1628 0 1628 50 16 Raipur 10874 3778 34.7 6669 427 7096 65 6481 2947 45.5 3252 282 3534 55 17 Rajnandc^aon 5014 1985 39.6 '2165 864 3029 60 2651 1344 50.7 1050 257 1307 49 18 Surguja 8296 2322 28.0 5^74 0 5974 72 5431 1580 29.1 3851 0 3851 71 Total 82145 27143 33.0 49885 5117 55002 67 49887 20132 40.4 26655 3100 29755 60 * Trained as per NOTE guidelines Source: Planning data 2008-09 ■■ Chhattisgarh 2009-10 EXISTING SCHOOL (GOVERNMENT) INFRASTRUCTURE No. of schools No. of schools No. of schools No. of schools Upper Total No.of Total No. of Gap in class Primary without 0/water without common without girls without access No. of school PS building Primary Schools classrooms rooms as per Schools UPS building SI District facility Toilet facility Toilet ramps without HM sanctioned Schools sacntioned so OISE/actual Sanctioned rooms so far Sanctioned far survey So far P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP So far 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 Bastar 2570 569 3482 2390 587 459 2170 493 2938 1025 1 1912 223 1059 0 1007 1069 753 795 2 Bijapur 58^ 144 784 284 194 40 ’775 138 828 170 809 182 735 829 829 182 182 3 Bilaspur 2300 1001 8349 4052 314 236 1522 306 2134 713 1695 570 1325 1164 559 559 512 556 4 Dahtewada 1276 ■ys 2103 91^ 166 53 1301 301 1460 293 1424, 338 1683 1229 1436 1436 343 343 5 Dhamtari 888 439 2349 1329 137 131 330 80 464 213 528 270 481 552 203 203 212 212 6 burq 2106 1075 6381 3679 218 214 1039 552 1810 850 1745 734 1341 707 157 157 449 449 7 Janjqir Champa 1450 721' 4645 2244 306 273 697 267 1427 619 596 297 1242 1114 440 559 435 468 8 Jashpur 1789 477 3873 1325 268 55 849 311 1560 297 773 213 364 0 725 721 253 254 9 Kanker 1518 548 3742 1501 216 115 1022 299 1444 390 1233 270 402 634 600 519 278 338 10 kawardha 836 516 2583 1587 184 145 572 345 670 347 310 168 730 920 296 413 365 410 11 Korba' 1339 446 3304 2188 146 67 246 52 1531 367 1213 409 694 354 502 502 219 213 12 Korea 953 389 2531 1169 106 79 476 ' 134 741 245 669' 270 189 760 333 372 248 281 13 MaHasamund 1311 469 1881 1283 139 87 377 74 988 188 438 113 611 1297 128 128 236 236 14 Narayanpgr 268 91 299 112 181 50 308 53 417 91 0 0 0 0 115 133 62 66 15 Raigarh 1911 709 5354 2903 162 138 1501 380 1891 537 977 346 928 1672 454 454 480 480 16 Raipur* 2888 1380 10620 5392 848 753 2162 974 2885 1230 1998 750 2461 1104 618 696 866 866 17 Rajnandgaon 1878 752 3980 2083 193 131 588 271 1606 j 585 872 402 694 578 276 385 308 308 18 Surguja 4104 1497 9814 4383 532 264 2799 1080 2947 1127 2637 1040 1991 1427 1699 1923 1143 1143 Total 29971 11548 76074 38822 4897 3290 18734 6110 27741 9287 19829 6595 16195 14247 10377 11058 7344 7600 Source: DISE 2007-08 Table 18 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Information on Govt. Upper Primary Schools Without Furniture No. of UPS UPS Provided TLE No, of Govt. UPS Block/ Municipal Total No. of Balance UPS Enrolment in S.No Sanctioned under under SSA as non OBB without Furniture Area Govt. UPS (6=3-4-5) these Govt. UPS SSA Since 2001 School Since 2001 (Out of Col. 6) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Bastar 1176 722 722 0 ! 454 68848 2 Bijapur 182 104 78 0 78 10156 3 Bilaspur 1056 512 544 0 544 108688 4 Dantewada 343 187 156 0 156 19985 5 Dhamtari 448 214 234 0 234 48723 6 Durg 1147 449 698 0 698 145720 7 Janjgir_Champa 790 442 347 0 348 78513 8 Jashpur 477 259 477 0 218 30463 9 Kanker 550 279 263 0 271 35994 10 Kawardha 516 365 151 0 151 34334 11 Korba 494 213 213 0 281 46861 12 Korea 411 248 163 0 163 27488 13 Mahasamund 469 236 469 0 233 64847 14 Narayanpur 105 62 62 0 43 5917 15 Raigarh 917 482 914 0 435 62602 16 Raipur 1550 866 684 0 684 172674 17 Rajnandgaon . 758 326 758 0 432 74984 18 Surguja 1717 1143 574 0 574 103080 Total 11748 6283 6707 0 5465 1060873 Source: Planning data 2008-09 'Chhattisgarh 2009-10 CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEED (CWSN) No. of CWSN No. of CWSN No. of CWSN NO. of Resource No. of Schools Block/ Municipal No. of CWSN Proposed to Proposed to S .N o . enrolled in teachers to be proposed to be Area Identified cover through cover through Schools apppointed made barrier free EGS HBE* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Bastar 1755 1643 72 12 3 72 2 Bijapur 961 961 0 12 0 14 3 Bilaspur 4280 4160 20 100 4 50 4 Dantewada 18'52 1852 0 12 1 14 5 Dhamtari 1445 1425 0 10 3 20 6 Durg 6102 5997 0 105 8 672 7 Janjgir_Champa 1665 1653 0 12 4 50 8 Jashpur 1'967 1254 0 22 3 45 9 Kanker 2381 2356 20 5 2 33 10 Kawardha 1961 1932 29 0 3 24 11 Korba 1089 1024 0 10 2 0 12 Korea 1524 1517 0 7 2 90 13 Mahasamund 3409 3264 '100 45 3 25 14 Narayanpur 153 143 10 0 0 0 15 Raigarh 3536 2916 0 42 5 1323 16 Raipur 4725 4517 75 133 5 75 17 Rajnandgaon 2728 2672 1 1326 18 Surguja 4620 4510 0 10 6 110 To ta l 46153 43796 326 537 55 3943 * Home Based Education Source: Planning data 2008-09 Table 20 (2) Details of Schools besed on the no of Classrooms Name of State: Chhattlsgarh More than 3 Class Avarage @ Rs 0.075 Up to 3 Class Rooms Total Eligible rooms Lakh SI. Name of Block/ No. Municipal Area Fin Fin (@ Phy (@ Rs.0.05 Phy Rs.0.1 Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Lakh) Lakh) 1 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 Bastar 2718 135.900 421 42.10 3,139 178.000 3,139 235.425 3,139 178.000 2 Bijapur 685 34.250 45 4.50 730 38.75Q 730 54.750 730 38.750 3 Bilaspur 1835 91.750 1466 146.60 3,301 238.350 3,301 247.575 3,301 238.350 4 Dantewada 1503 75.150 98 9.80 1,601 84.950 1,601 120.075 1,601 84.950 5 Dhamtari 783 39.150 544 54.40 1,327 93.550 1,327 99.525 1,327 93.550 6 Durg 1881 94.050 1300 130.00 3,181 224.050 3,18’1 238.575 , 3,181 224.050 7 Janjgir_Champa 1440 72.000 731 73.10 2,171 145.100 2,171 162.825 2,171 145.100 8 Jashpur 2103 105.150 163 16.30 2,266 121.450 2,266 169.950 2,266 121.450 9 Kanker 1441 72.050 625 62.50 2.066 134.550 2,066 154.950 2,066 134.550 10 Kawardha 1157 57.850 195 19.50 1,352 77.350 1,352 101.400 1,352 77.350 11 Korba 1638 81.900 147 14.70 1,785 96.600 1,785 133.875 1,785 96.600 12 Korea 994 49.700 348 34.80 1,342 84.500 1,342 100.650 1,342 84.500 13 Mahasamund 1061 53.050 719 71.90 1,780 124.950 1,780 133.500 1,780 124.950 14 Narayanpur 268 13.400 91 9.10 359 22.500 359 26.925 359 22.500 15 Rai^arh 2333 116.650 287 28.70 2,620 145.350 2,620 196.500 2,620 145.350 16 Raipur 2597 129.850 1671 167.10 4,268 296.950 4,268 320.100 4,268 296.950 17 Rainandgaon 1999 99.950 631 63.10 2,630 163.050 2,630 197.250 2,630 163.050 18 Surguja 3341 167.050 2260 226.00 5,601 393.050 5,601 420.075 5,601 393.050 Tota l 29777 1,488.850 11.742 1174.20 41,519 2,663.050 41,519 3113.925 41,519 2663.050 Source: DISE 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Information regarding Resource Persons for BRC/UBRC/CRC No. of BRP Posts No. of No. of No. of BRPs sanctioned during No. of BRPs No. of BRPs S.No. District Eligible proposed by DPEP & being funded eligible Schools funded by BRPs the state by state (In case of under SSA SSA DPEP district) 1 BASTAR 3969 240 61 179 '61 61 2 BIJAPUR 1019 80 20 57 23 20 3 BILASPUR 3629 200 162 38 28 4 DANTEWADA 1798 140 37 103 37 37 5 DHAMTARI 1360 80 0 85 -5 0 6 DURG 3463 240 240 240 240 7 JANJGIR 2417 180 75 105 75 75 8 JASIHPUR 2387 16'0 ' 64 96 64 64 9 KANKER 2156 140 9 131 9 9 10 l^W A i^D H A 1570 80 21 59 21 21 11 KOR^BA , 2069 100 6 94 6 6 12 KOREA 143'2 ibo 25 75 25 25 13 MAriASAMUND 1818 100 a 123 -23 0 14 r^Af^YANP'UR 522’ 40' 24 16 16 15 r a ig A irh 3023 18tf 66 114 66 66 16 i^1F>UR 4fet5 300 23 277 23 23 17 'f^ j n a n d g a o n 2650 180 42 138 42 42 18 SURGUJA 6072 380 122 258 122 122 Toial 4602d 2920 s W 2080 840 855 Table22 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 COMPUTER AIDED LEARNING (CAL) Block/ Municipal No. of Govt. UP Schools covered No. of teachers No. of Schools to be S .N o . No. of Beneficiaries Area Schools under CA L trained on CAL covered this year 1 2 3 ,4 5 6 7 1 Bastar 1116 40 5401 58 24 2 Bijapur 1011 31 563 29 17 3 Bilaspur 2531 209 14117 209 15 4 Dantewada 1779 58 1083 68 17 5 Dhamtari 448 29 2900 29 24 6 Durg 28 34 2736 14 32 7 Janjgir_Champa 790 14 1130 10 23 8 Jashpur 555 33 1830 66 20 9 Kanker 550 62 2487 69 18 10 Kawardha 516 41 ' 691 40 21 11 Korba 494 33 1650 33 28 12 Korea 411 46 3161 46 22 13 Mahasamund 469 92 6042 82 24 14 Narayanpur 105 11 1157 22 22 15 Raigarh 917 26 4812 107 20 16 Raipur 1550 41 6391 41 27 17 Rajnandgaon 758 47 1783 141 27 18 Surguja 1717 66 5389 55 24 To ta l 15745 913 63323 1119 405 Source: Planning data 2008-09 Table22 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 Information regarding NPEGEL Block/ Municipal No. of M C S in No. of girls S .N o . No. of E B B No. of M CS Total M CS A re a Urban Slums enrolled in MCS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Bastar 12 167 0 167 124788 2 Bijapur 4 52 4 53 37057 3 Bilaspur 10 130 22 152 134524 4 Dantewacia 7 96 6 96 62240 5 Dhamtari 0 0 0 0 0 6 Durg ' 1 16 1 17 ! 19073 7 Janjgir_Champa 1 8 1 8 19674 8 Jashpur 3 30 0 30 19478 9 Kanker 0 0 0 0 0 10 Kawardha 3 43 0 43 53759 11 Kqrba 5 81 8 89 56713 12 Korea 3 42 0 42 39013 13 Mahasamund 0 0 0 0 0 14 Narayanpur 2 22 b 22 12885 15 Raff^arh 2 30 0 30 28737 16 Raipur 6 107 7 114 49559 17 Rajiiandgaon 0 0 0 0 0 18 Surguja 15 195 1 196 65806 TOTAL 74 1019 50 1059 723306 Source: Planning data 2008-09 Table 24 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 information on KGBV Operational, Enrolm ent KGBV sanctioned (IModelwise) Enrolment (Social categorywise) Building Status (Modelwise) (Modelwise) s. No D is tric t 1 II III Total 1 11 III Total 1 II III Total S C S T O B C Muslims BPL Total Completed In Progress 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2i 22 1 Bastar 12 0 0 12 12 0 0 12 1200 d 0 iio o 139 904 96 14 47 1200 1 11 2 Bijapur' 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 500 d 0 500 40 393 67 0 0 500 2 3 3 Bilaspur 9 1 0 10 9 1 0 10 893 50 0 943 327 347 254 15 0 943 5 5 4 Dantewada 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 7 700 d 0 700 36 541 76 0 47 700 2 5 5 Dhamtari 2 0 0 2 2 0 ' 0 2 ■ 197 d 0 197 13 119 65 0 0 197 1 1 6 Durq 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 250 d 0 250 112 29 87 8 14 250 1 2 7 Janiqir Champa 7 0 0 7 7 ___q 0 7 1304 0 0 1304 184 175 340 1 604 1304 6 1 8 Jashpur 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 300 ■ o1 0 300 20 216 64 d d 300 1 2 9 Kanker 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 100 0 d 100 11 75 14 0 0 100 0 1 10 Kawardha 4 d 0 4 4 0 0 4 396 o' 0 396 12 361 23 6 0 396 0 4 11 Korba 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 ' 5 500 0 0 500 47 382 64 7 d 5dd 3 2 12 Korea 4 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 4 400 0 0 400 32 285 72 0 11 400 3 1 13 Mahasamund 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 3 300 0 0 300 99 105 92 4 0 300 3 0 14 Naravanpur 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 200 d 0 200 12 177 11 d d 2dd 1 1 15 Raiqarh 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 200 d 0 200 19 138 43 d 0 200 0 2 16 Raipur 6 1 0 7 6 1 0 7 600 50 0 650 132 300 213 4 1 650 4 3 17 Rainandqaon 18 Surquja 15 1 0 16 15 1 0 1 16 1459 50 1509 72 1168 243 26 1509 4 12 T O T A L 90 3 0 93 90 3 0 93 9499 150 0 9649 1307 5715 1824 53 750 9649 37 £6 Source: Planning data 2008-09 Chhattisgarh 2009-10 FINANCIAL POSITION (As per Audit Report) (SSA) Amount Released Amount received % of Expenditure % of Expenditure State Share due Approved Opening Total Amount Shortfall/excess in Y e a r from other Expenditure against Approved against Available as per GOI Outlay Balance Available state Share GOI State sources Outlay funds release 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2002-03 7543.53 2850.98 900.97 3751.95 2106.37 1 27.92 56.14 2003-04 21219,23 7501.08 2500.36 1653.55 11654.99 7559.21 35.62 64.86 2004-05 35917.02 19597.00 6500.00 4927.97 65.17 31090.14 27444.56 76.41 88.27 2005-06 53729.31 27994,63 10000.00 3253.11 708.35 41956.09 41623.05 ilA l 99.21 2006-07 80390.70 50660.49 15883.25 822.90 859.04 68225.68 63531.25 79.03 93.12 2007-08 75130.14 45558.59 24531.00 4590.54 1180.28 75860.42 05180.69 86.76 85.92 2008-09 86483.50 49597.31 26606.00 8153.45 37.67 84394.42 03539.71 73.47 75.29 Amount Released Amount received % of Expenditure % of Expenditure State Share due Approved Opening Total Amount Shortfall/excess in Year from other Expenditure against Approved against Available as per GOI O Outlay Balance Available state Share GOI State sources Outlay funds release 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2002-03 2003-04 610.86 115.00 38.33 153.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2004-05 3479.33 1189,76 396.58 0.77 1587.11 1980.91 56.93 124,81 2005-06 1338.71 1189.76 396.58 27.01 1613.35 1123.50 83.92 69.64 2006-07 1740.96 521,71 173.90 10.75 706.36 810.25 46.54 11-4.71 2007-08 1313.36 687,01 370.00 8.33 1065.34 1244.38 94.75 116.81 2008-09 720.63 410.00 220.77 82.42 630.77 240.69 33.40 38.16 Table25 Chhattisgarh 2009'10 (KGBV) ■ 1 Amount received % of Expenditure % of Expenditure State Share due Approved Amount Released Opening Total Amount Shortfall/excess in Year from other Expenditure against Approved against Available as per GOI Outlay Balance Available state Share GOI State sources Outlay funds release 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 1133.49 810.33 270.11 0.00 0.00 1080.44 383,39 : 33.82 35.48 2005-06 0.00 0.00 0.00 697.05 0.00 697.05 425,09 0.00 60.98 2006-07 0.00 1240.21 413.39 272.00 0,00 1925.60 88,50 0.00 4.60 2007-08 2034.78 542.09 452.16 1040,58 0.00 2034,83 2034,83 100.00 100.00 2008-09 2841.03 1846.55 600,00 0,00 0.00 2446,55 1471,15 8.47 9.84 (T o ta l) Approved Amount Released Opening Amount received Total Amount % of Expenditure % of Expenditure State Share due Shortfall/excess In Year Expenditure Outlay GOl State Balance from other Available against Approved against Available as per GOI state Share 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 2002-03 7543.53 2850.98 900.97 0,00 0.00 3751.95 2106.37 27,92 56.14 0,00 0,00 2003-04 21830,09 7616,08 2538.69 1653,55 0.00 11808.32 7559.21 35,62 64.86 0,00 0,00 2004-05 40529.84 21597.09 7166.69 4927.97 65.94 33757.69 29808,86 167,17 248.57 0,00 0,00 2005-06 • 55068.02 29184.39 10396.58 3950,16 735,36 44266.49 43171,59 161,39 229.82 0,00 0.00 2006-07 82131.66 52422.41 16470.54 1094,90 869.79 70857.64 1 64430,00 125.57 212.42 0,00 0.00 2007-08 78478.28 46787.69 25353.16 5631.12 1188,61 78960.58 68459.89 281.51 302,73 0.00 0.00 2008-09 90045.15 51853.86 27426.77 8235.87 37,67 87471,74 66251.55 115.34 123,29 0,00 0.00 Table-26 Remedial Teaching - 2009-10 CHHATTISGARH No of No of SI. Govt.and 5 % of Children for District Enrolment No Aided Schools remidial Schools teaching 1 Bastar 3,969 270,788 198 13509 2 Bijapur 1,019 53,313 51 2668 3 Bilaspur 3,629 414,389 181 20668 4 Dantewada 1,798 97,723 90 4892 5 Dhamtari 1,360 147,753 68 7388 6 Durg 3,463 435,208 173 21742 7 Janjglr_Champa 2,417 249,970 121 12514 8 Jashpur 2,387 112,688 119 5618 9 Kanker 2,156 125,604 108 6292 10 Kawardha 1,570 ~ 138,734 79 ^ 6981 11 Korba 2,069 179,198 103 8921 12 Korea 1,432“ ^ 94,499 72 4751 13 Mahasamund 1,818 181,531 91 9087 14 Narayanpur 522 25,157 26 1253 15 Raigarh 3,023 199,527 151 9966 16 Raipur 4,675~" 605,509 234 30308 17 Rajnandgaon 2,650 241,122 133 12102 18 Surguja 6,072 399,839 304 20018 Total 46029 3,972,552 2302 198676 a Proposal for Distribution of Free Text Books (Edu +TWD +Govt. Aided+Madarsa)- Primary level (including EGS and SSA) Table-27 (A) Year 2009-10 S. Name of District S C Boys S T Boys 1 II III IVV Total 1 II III IVV Total 1 Bastar 1037 899 778 734 604 4052 19704 16541 15472 13572 10410 75699 2 Bijapur 333 296 259 226 128 1242 2736 2473 2197 1729 1396 10531 3 Bilaspur 11249 10321 9720 8359 6983 46632 8114 7393 7149 6396 5498 34550 4 Dantewada 558 406 341 266 182 1753 8349 6585 5045 3784 2896 26659 5 Dhamtari 1002 962 969 741 832 4506 2562 2792 2949 2771 2739 13813 6 Durg 5744 5152 5516 5116 4159 25687 4457 4018 4629 4443 4025 21572 7 Janjgir-Champa 7543 6486 5769 5326 5316 30440 3887 3093 3035 2642 2397 15054 8 Ja s h p u r 987 890 822 772 677 4148 8390 7289 7086 6252 5837 34854 9 Kanker 577 531 482 437 406 2433 6481 6095 5520 5097 4720 27913 10 Kawardlia 2228 1766 1670 1585 1246 8495 3090 2604 2407 1994 1623 11718 11 Korba 2577 2280 1946 1735 1535 10073 10117 9277 8104 6989 6162 40649 12 Koriya 762 684 789 709 608 3552 4868 4822 5119 4333 3566 22708 13 IVIahasamund 3603 3536 3433 3220 2647 16439 4914 4223 4169 3648 3312 20266 14 Narayanpur 106 93 80 75 62 416 2099 1763 1649 1446 1109 8066 15 Raigarh 3587 3456 3025 2912 2679 15659 7345 7439 7082 6432 5562 33860 16 Raipur 13618 13351 12167 11491 9759 60386 8313 8149 8477 7261 6141 38341 17 Rajnandgaon 2219 2001 1995 1745 1564 9524 5943 5766 5777 4980 4292 26758 18 Sarguja 2274 2321 2326 2008 1705 10634 24275 22369 22310 18540 15128 102622 Clihattisgarh 60004 55431 52087 47457 41092 256071 135644 122691 118176 102309 86813 565633 Proposal for Distribution of Free Text Books (Edu +TWD +Govt Afded+Ma?larsa)- Primarjf level (including EGS and SSA) Tablo-27 (A) Year 2009-10 S. Name of District AU Girls (SC+ST+OBC+GEN) rota! 1 11" ill IV V Total 1 11 111 VI V Total 1 Bastar 27869 24859 20790 16154 13352 103024 48610 42299 37040 30460 24366 182775 2 sFj^pur 3710 3403 3155 2375 1796 14439 6779 6172 5611 4330 3320 26212 3 Bllaspur 42287 39312 36407 ' 30278 26086 174370 61650 57026 53276 45033 38567 255S52 4 Dantewada 11921 8019 7445 5471 4906 38762 20828 16010 12831 9521 7984 67174 5 bhamtari 10924 10474 10303 10564 10630 52895 14488 14228 14221 14076 14201 71214 6purg 32039 30405 32549 32466 29271 156730 ’ 42240 39576 42694 42025 37455 203989 7 Janjqir-Champa 24784 22844 20646 18569 ____ 104657 36214 32423 29450 26537 25427 150051 8 Jashpur " ’ 11343 11193 10853 9992 8918 52299 20720 19372 18761 17016 15432 91301 9 Kanker 10907 10575 9892 8847 8009 48230 17965 17201 15894 14381 13135 78576 10 Kawardha 13941 10840 11328 10861 6699 53669 19259 15210 15405 14440 9568 73882 11^ korba 20369 19262 16725 14559 12748 83663 33063 30819 26775 23283 20445 134385 12 Koriya 8298 9311 8664 7932 6785 40990 13928 14817 14572 12974 10959 67250 Vi 43 Mahasamund 13289 , 11685 12899 12083 11123 61079 21806 19444 20501 18951 17082 97784 14 Narayanpur 2741 2445 2045 1589 1313 10133 4946 4301 3774 3110 2484 18615 15 Raigarh 18650 18494 17374 16117 ' 14670 ' 85305 29582 29389 27481 25461 22911 134824 16 Raipur 52616 51574 57130 48439 51614 261373 74547 73074 77774 67191 67514 360100 17 Rajnandgaon 18957 20021 19410 16fe44 14356 89388 27119 27788 27182 23369 20212 125670 18 Sarguja" 36303 35839 36349 40364 24256 173111 62852 60529 60985 60912 41089 286367 Ctihattis^afh 360948 341655 333984 303304 264246 1604017 556596 519677 504227 453070 392151 2425721 Table-27 (B) 2009-10 Proposal for Distribution of Free Text Books (Edu +TWD +Govt Aided+Madarsa)- Upper Primary level S. SC Boys ST Boys All Girls Total Name of District No. VI VII VIII Total VI VII VIII Total VI VII VIII Total VI VII VIII Total 1 Bastar 704 582 501 1787 10051 7980 6474 24505 12807 10150 9507 32464 23562 18712 16482 58756 Bijapur i 2 166 62 94 322 1369 984 637 2990 1332 1066 768 3166 2867 2112 1499 647? Bilaspur 3* 5416 4944 4912 15272 4920 4479 4152 13551 19452 18186 17097 54735 29788 27609 26161 83558 ' 4 Dantewada 306 154 171 631 2495 2080 1310 5886 3670 3376 2165 9211 6471 5610 3646 15727 Ohamtarl ' 5 756 633 681 2070 2127 2131 1867 6125 9034 8708 7977 25719 11917 11472 10525 33914 Durg 6 4259 3671 3482 11412 4277 3710 3339 11326 28961 26287 24524 79772 37497 33668 31345 102510 Janjgir-Champa 7 4809 4403 4371 13583 2297 2048 2032 6377 15489 13650 16604 45743 22595 20101 23007 65703 Jashpur 8 577 525 464 1566 5246 4847 4706 147^9 7837 7462 7126 22425 13660 12834 12296 38790 Kanker 9 421 387 343 1151 3721 3531 3253 10505 7071 6691 6170 19932 11213 10609 9766 31588 Kawardt\a W 1028 1005 1225 3258 2073 2111 1697 5881 5441 5383 5166 15990 8542 8499 8088 25129 Korba 11 1960 1787 1506 5253 5958 5400 4539 15897 13058 11665 9774 34497 20976 18852 15819 55647 Koriya 12 542 541 560 1643 3202 3035 2637 8874 6413 5771 5517 17701 10157 9347 8714 28218 Mahasamund 13 2998 2362 2399 7759 3963 3273 2652 9888 10182 9071 8635 27888 17143 14706 13686 45535 Narayanpur 14 67 56 49 172 1073 850 690 2613 1085 861 806 2752 2225 1767 1545 5537 Raigarh 15 2582 2335 2275 7192 5242 4462 4241 13945 14110 12205 12405 38720 21934 19002 18921 59857 Raipur 16 8757 6784 6317 21858 5219 4770 4369 14358 38481 32211 31297 101989 52457 43765 41983 138205 Rajnandgaon 17 1470 1354 1268 4092 4087 3536 3142 10765 13653 12217 11450 37320 19210 17107 15860 52177 18 Sarguja 1519 1490 1254 4263 13219 11808 10212 35239 20640 18963 16612 56215 35378 32261 28078 95717 District 38337 33075 31872 103284 80539 71035 61949 213523 228716 203923 193600 626239 347592 308033 287421 943046 COSTING- SSA, NPEGEL & KGBV SUta Summary - AW PB 2009-10 SSA, Chhattlsgarti - ir«a.awaiiioBwi-i i^nOvMkomtoot 1 Spill Oy«« ham lOM rrMit Amxovm Total Ind. •pW ov*c MMtvtmaM M M 4t Fl»»« PrspoMl JOW-10 fr«»h R*commMd«tlon 204t«10 JC&lb. JBUt. -Cilk. N«w r»rtm«fY ftoM (tar »M chUdran) o< PS to UPS J5 "T35' "398 ISST i N. T««oiw» S«l«/y I.m N w pa N«w TMdian SMiy (K-lll 0.1 eeo 0.336 o .ieao ~ms Try ■ys ■551 -CTsr m ~vm "SlBBg 'o.Sre'0 f1S4 'T3g:a'94' TTiTf i38.»94 0.000 'b'zoib Tm "{W'sio N«w Ul»a T«»Bww a»WY M-lll ■5TO mm OOIV/OI 0.600 b .o W 0.0001 ' 6!b6b -o^agg b.'b&o ig?^ dooo b'bobi 0.000 o.ooc • Dm ilvOASSSSSL 71.37 Ntm AMttml T««ch«f PH. tm il -sm i»biv/bf 'T o S 3 ‘ TgSgg bibob I o.bool 0.0000 o.oOo b.bbo "53ST _a^ps ■a.. ■5:535 -55557 TTTW -S 33T ’ 57r 7BT T 88P -5577 TT55T 69.24 o.oob b.boiS li^0.#3b[ ^0311 ' 15b.93bf j j i i m 1«i,327‘ “ W 0.000b . ; 34 i STm TS " T O s r *375:375' -n sB <64S3<> "s s s r ■ m T 55 5 1042^01 104.2801 3476 ~ f i ill nLalMi iii Mgrtmir 76.908 76.908 56.866 20.240 56.550 t»31 ertOQ« Couriii 2048.500 20465 2048.500 0.0680 20485 __fpoo • Cc m Rm u M (UPX» 1038.428 1038.428 539.632 498.796 18571 1857.100| 185711 1857.100| 18571 1262.828 18571 1262.828 ’is m 4o ^ m f T s m ■ j s i r m •4SB 3T - m m ~3s m "TH Z rTTT ■3T l i ~45S54 '434i :4l ^ ' 49894} ^393.9101 •7I8W 3073.021 49894 3073.021 T m ' m ’’m m - 5 5 m TTSSI 'TSIS " 5m ■5:55T r 233095 " 45S Tg6r i 35o ^ 466.1^1 "51 6000 o bbiibi' '198^ 8' JSL2SS V986>8 387.356 ■5355 -T S im m -S J H e "T75!35i " 75:11 o.bbo 13355? 46t.f90| 2iiilb'At| 466.19^ 0.000 198678 397.386 TSiSTs • f. ftmT0Kt$o9k Pr— Tmd Bo»H(P) o.bbo ' 5:55?T 55 • iTO o -TT555 ?:5555g 7425727 i^328.6tel 24257211 2328.69i( "5l o:o5o' i.o'oosel 2425741 a 24ifS721 23Z8.692 fit* T«u tack (UP) ~5:55o' T o o l b b ^ 0.06268" 943044' 19^1.536 943046 1961.5^41 0.000 i.0b208| 943046 1961.536 ^ 4 3 0 4 6 1961.536 EHHUJ*amaEHja$iim£iEmEHi3ZflKEma m i o.bob 3g i >«7 4290.22813^687671 4290.2281 b:boo 3368787 J*2?2:222 338578?' 4290.228 H. InlanMloni lor Di Hb M 500.064 12619 361.558 138.506 72.30 0.000 46163 553.836 46153| 553.836 0.0120 46153 553.836 46163 553.838 46193 s'sifte — 4(il53l i m •367m M i t i ' f t T i w - m s 0.066 583.838 553.836. SUte Summ»ry - AWPB 2009-10 SSA, Chhattlag«rti SUU Surrnvirv ------^ . ------1------1...... V ....•“! SplH Qh(*r from lOOlJ Over from SOQlJ 6.N. Compofwni IOv« Ft»M OOlJI TbUI Inc1. ilXII OVM Ac »4ivlngi MFro•hPt ul 200a i« T(H«| ItKl •pllloVW 09 1 Fr«.n(tecorrwnei>d«i|ion joot 10 1 Toul me1 • lloot 1 Fin. Unit c o t ftp, . «tv. ^in...... Pi>y, . Fin. Phy, Fin. Phy.] r\n. . ..Fin.,. Fin. h.oiIbrc 0 0.00 i.ooo 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 #0iv/0! »OIV/OI 0.000 0,0t)00i 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4.0000 0 ooool 0 0 000 il.oJcRC 21C 43.72 2.000 ■■ "'147 294,000 -"363 3i7'.7'4"i5' 142 303.321 221 34,402 39 89.81 b 3V40'i o,oboo 0 0.000 0 34.402 0 34,402 2.0000 0 0000 0 34.402 1 l.oal Pitm*ry School (40 cMidrvn) 5a SS.S5 4.660 0 0,000 58 55.546 27 5S.!546 , ii 0.000 "i7' 100.00 ---- 6 2.610 ooobo 1 4 650 1 7 2S6 0 2 eio 4 6500 1 4.650 1 7 260 11.IM Primary School (10 chUdr«n) 341 74.52 2,000 9 18,000 3io 92.516 ------gg 80.516 SW 12.000 16 8t.03 S 12.000! 3,8750 0 0.000 0 12.600 0 12.000 20006 0 o.oool 0 12,000 ll.oJuppw Prtm*^v School * 2 i 367.09 5.170 25 129,2'Sb 4^2 496.3^6 64 454.976 388 41,380 14 91.67 ___i 41.360^ 0.0000 39S 2057^0 398 2099.020 0 41 360 5 1700 190 982.306j 190 1023 660 11 oJ School Buttdlno in 4B 274,40 0 0,000 48 274.400 0 274.400 48 0.000 0 100.00 0 0 000 0,0000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0-000 0.0000 0 oood 0 0,000 {Bluing for Prtnwy School Mncitonotf ll.orjin pravtou* yMn uMor SSA (to 120 25.82 0 0,000 120 25,824 0 25.824 120 0.000 0 100.00 0 0.000 0,0000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.0000 0 O.OOtt 0 0.000 JsulMifv for Prvtwry School Mr>ctton«« ll.oatnprovleuAyMrvurxtor SSA (40 582 397 38 4,650 1306 6072,900 1888 6470,276 962 6439 776 926 30.500 51 99 53 0 30.500 4,6500 365 1697,250 365 1727 750 0 30.500 4.6500 0 0 000 0 30 500 1 Button for Oppar Prtfwy School 11.0M Mhettortod M provtout yMr« undor 996 800.59 5.170 419 2166.230 1415 2766,820 367 2707.595 1028 59 226 27 97.86 0 59 226 0,0000 0 0.000 0 59.226 0 59 226 5 1700 0 o.ooJ 0 59 226 SSA 11.ldAMMon«l CIMO Ko«n{P8) 29ii 506.12 2.666 5785 h 570,000 ^el9i 120>6,11> 5638 120i0.li7 4060 46.000 i s 99.62 6 46.000 o.booo 10012 20024.000 l'0bl2 20076.000 0 46.000 2.0000 3243 e466.00d| 3243 6S32.00C 11.11 AbdWonrt CIBM RoormUPS) 1478 539.46 2.000 4293... 8S86 000 s m 9125,462 i9'i8 91251462... 28*i> .. 0.000 51 6 < 0.000 0,0060 6150 12300.000 6150 12366.000 0 0000 2.0000 2248 4496.00d 2248 4496,000 11.1JjTolUVUrt(wt*(P8) ■ '5 ieo 0.000 6,006 ...... 0 " "4.598 .... ■""0 4.598 0.000 #0l\//0l 0 0.000 • 0.0000 59 14.750 59 14.790 0 0.000 0.0000 0 0 0,000 11.1»S«pVMtGlrteTotM 0 0.01 6,060 0 0,066 D 0,606 0 0.006 0 0.000 «DiO/0! S' 0.000 0.0000 2691 1345.500 2691 1345,500 0 0.000 0.5000 0 O.OOM 0 O.OOC ll.Wwttcf Faculty 0 9.00 0.000 0 0,000 0 .... 9.66ii ■..... "o' 9.002 ------5 6.'b66 "wiW/61 ■ ' ■5 0.000' 0.6600 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 000 0.0000 0 oood 0 0,000 II.ISlBourwlory W»0 0 0,00 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.060 0 0.000 0 0.000 »OIV/OI o" 0.000 0.0000 0. 0.000 0 0.006 0 0.000 ■ b o.ood 0 0,000 11.1«S*pw«torvWitl 0 ■ b.od ....b:(535 ■■■'■■6' 6.000 ■ 0 0.000 0.600 " ' o ' 0.600 #OIV/Of' ....0 0.000 0.6000 6 0.000 0 6.000 0 HllllilkOl o.oool 0 0.000 11.17] etoeVMcatkm 0 o.oi 6.600 0 0.000 0 6.600 0 0.060 0 0.006 «OIV/OI #OIV/OI ' 0.060 0.0666 0 0.600 0 0.000 0 ■■■Hill o.ooq 0 0.000 11.1 J HMd MaotWs ftoom ■ 0 ~ (i.od 0.600 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 ...... '6 — ^d.066 #OIV/Ot «OIV«)! "■ 0.060 0.0600 0 0.000 0 0.060 0 0,000 0 o.ood 0 0.000 11.1l|A4hnm«haU(Raii4enii«l Schoota) 0 0.00 0,006 0 0.600 0 o.dob ' 0 0.060 0 0.000 «OIV/OI •OlV/OI — 5 0,000 6.6660 61 3267.770 61 3267,770 0 0,000 36.0500 61 2199.0SW 61 2199,050 11.2Q|M«»Qrft«i(»lrs(Pr4iTWV} . 0 0.00 0,000 366 450,06^ 'Ci6d 450.064 io< 450.064 165 0.000 si 100.00 01 0,000 0.6000' 393 4>7.742 393 ' 477,742 0 0.000 0 0 0,000 11.21 M«tgr R«lp«ir« (W W Prtnwy) b 0.00 o,'6oo 77 i02,42ii 102.425 ...... 40 162.435 37 ' 0,000 ■100.00 ■" ■ o’ 0,000 0.0000 59 lot .733 59 107,733 0 0.000 0 o.ood 0 0,00c II.iJbala Conoopl (iri Oovt UPS) 0 o.o6 0,250 2'sl 6,250 ' i h d.2io "‘6' 6,250 . ■ ' 25' 6.000 0 "^w;65' . 0 0,000 b.6o6o O' 0.000 6 0.060 0 0.060 0.0000 0 0. ^ 0 0.000 11J»Othtr(Bcundwy SViril) 6 0.00 0.066 •■"■61 0,000 0 0,000 ...... ■■ff' 0.000 o' o,6oo #OIV>/OI ... "S'g 0,600 0.0660 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,0000 0 0 0 000 il.jJrumnur* tor 0«!. UPS »IucI«m» 0 0.00 0.000 0 0.000 6 0.000 6 o.doo 0 0,000 «OfV/OI 0.000 0.0000 0 6.006 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,0050 ...... 6 o.oool 0 0000 Sub ToUtfCMI WwKi) 717S 2i9t.24 12452 2939S.'il9 ^9«31 32293.364 '10436 32069.(76 9196 223.488 63 99.31 ' '0 226.098 20189 41297.086 20169 41623.163 0 226,098 5743 J416(.00« 5743 14394.09S PumNufo for Oovl. gPS 1 1 11.lJNo.i>fChttdr*n 0 6.000 61 6.000 0 0.000 0 6.000 6: 0.000 «oi\//6i #oiv/6i "1 ... ° m 0.0000 27488 137.440 2>4s8' 13/.446 0 0.000 0,0050 14107 70.535 14107 70.535 1 tub ToUMPumKuro! 0 0.000 0! 0.000 0 0.000 . 2 0.000 16 0.006' •cm//oi' «biv/oi - -“0! 0.000 0.000 2t4(8 137.440 27488 137.440 0 0.000 0.005 14107 70.535 '14107 70.535 Sub T*i«) |ClvM*PumHur«l 7119 2898.245 124^2! 29^98.1^1^ 19831 3i2i3.3iM 104li ^2069.(76 9196 221.4«« ' ' 63 69.31 .....'5^ 226.098 6.000 478lrf 41434.496 47877 41666.693 0 i26.0«8 0.005 liiaso 14238.636 19850 14484.(33 laO. T««chht9 L*«mlh9 Cquipmont 1 1 I. OO' tr«1 TLE-Now Pfinwv -121 0.000 ■ 6.20 9 8 'riiS i.iob 8 "■ ' -1261 0.200 ' ' -7 88.88 0,000 0.0000 1 0.206 1 o:260 0 ■ 1 0.200 1 0.20c 12.6SrTie . Now UPPM Prtonorv 0 0.000 o.so ..... 2 S' l'2.!i66' ""2i ' 'i:^.soo ■ li 6,5bo '"^1 12,000 4 4.00 ....”a 0.000 HWEFI 398 ...TS?.o56" 398 199.006 0 190 95.000 190 95.00c iroj^oowrrtfi) 6 6.060 0.00 .0, 6.660 0 b.666 0 d.MO 6 0.000 ■#oiV/di" <^l\>/OI ■ ""a 6.6foo '3 1.500 3 1.560 0 0.660 o,id66 6 0.000 "6 oooc tub r N on Recurring 1 Construction of Building 0 0.00 36.05 9 324.450 9 324.45 9 324,456 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 2 BoundryWall , 0 0.00 1.50 9 13.500 9 13.50 9 13,500 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0,000 C 0,000 0 0,000 0 0,000 ! Boring/Handpump (minimum rates 3 0 0.00 1.00 g 9.000 9 9.00 9 9,000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 4 0 0.00 0.20 9 1.80 9 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 Eleclricily 9 1,800 1,800 0,000 0 0,000 Furnilure/Equipment including kitchen 5 0 0.00 3.00 9 27,000 9 27.00 9 26.994 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 e<)uipment Teaching learning mttlerial and 6 0 0.00 3.50 9 31.500 9 31.50 9 31.500 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 equipment including library books 7 Bedding 0 0.00 0.75 9 6.750 9 6.75 9 6.749 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0,000 Total Non Recurring 0 0.000 9 414.000 9 414.000 9 413.999 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Recurring Costs per annum ! Maintenance per girl student per month 1 0 0.00 9.00 93 819.000 93 819.00 93 638.820 0 0.000 93 823.500 93 823.500 0 0.000 93 823,500 93 823,500 ®Rs.750 Stipend for girl student per month @ Rs. 2 0 0.00 0.60 93 54.600 93 54.60 93 42.580 0 0,000 93 54,900 93 54.900 0 0.000 93 54,900 93 54,900 50 Course books, stationery tjnd other 3 0 0.00 0.60 93 54.600 93 54.60 93 42.588 0 0.000 Educational material ® Rs. 30 per month §5 i 5 § 1 80 0 6 3.666 93 54,900 93 54.900 '-J? 4 Examination fee 0 0.00 0.02 93 1,820 93 1.82 9^ 1.420 0 o,o6o' 93 1,830 93 1,830 0 0.000 93 1,830 93 1.830 5 SaUries: 0 6.00 12.06 93 1116,000 93 1116.o3 93 870.480 6 0,000 93 1116.000 93 1116,000 o' 0.000 93 1116,000 93 iii6;oo6 6 VocBtional training/ spocific skill training 0 0.00 0.50 93 45.700 93 45.70 93 35,646 0 0,000 93 45.900 93 45,900 0 0,000 93 45,900 93 45.900 7 Electricity/water charges 0 0.00 0.60 93 54.640 93 54.84 93 42.775 0 b.odb 93 55.080 93 55,080 0 0,000 93 55,080 93 55.080 Medical care/contingencies & Rs. 750 0.00 0.75 93 68.270 93 68.27 93 53.251 0 0,000 93 68.640 93 68.640 0 0.000 93 68,640 93 68.640 8 child 0 9 0 0.00 0.40 93 36.400 93 36.40 93 28,392 0 0.000 93 36.600 93 36,600 0 0,000 93 36,600 93 36.600 36.600 10 Miscellaneous including maintenance 0 0,00 0,40 93 36,400 93 36.40 93 28,392 0 0.000 93 36.600 93 36.600 0 0,000 93 36,600 93 11 ...... 6 0.00 0.15 93 13.750' 93 13.75 93 10,725 0 o.oob 93 13.800 93 13,600 0 0,000 93 13,800 93 13,800 0,000 93 13.800 13,800 12 PTAs/school functions h 0.00 o .is 93 13.7^0 93 13,7S 93 10'.725 0 o'.5o6 93 13.800 93 13.800 0 93 3T6oo 6 i7 .6 0 0 27,600 0 o,o'o6 fif,06b 9.600 13 Provision of Rent(12 months) 0 6.00 4.6o 13 84,000 18 84.06 13 ^5.526 0 8 8 8 14 0 0.00 0.30 93 27.^' 93 2?.90 93 21,762 ■ ' 6 o.obb 93 27.900 93 27,900 0 0,000 93 27,960 93 27.906 Total Rccuirinfj 6 0.00(3 93 2427.b30' 93 242rj(bO 93 1 8 9 3 . ^ 6 Aiioo 2377.050 93 23^.0 5 0 0 d.o()b 93 23kV.050 931 2354.050 Total (Non-R«uirjng'*'R«urring) 0.000 2841.030 2841.030 2307.082 0.000 2377.050 2377.050 0.000 2359.050 2359,050 ' state Summary on NPEGEL - 2009-10 - 6SA, Chhattisgarh ------rrH'iKKp'pr5v«milBW~" Pr555BrOTS.TII '"T?W»m?n5naTO'J06B-ir------S.N. Component a-jiTvs,™;------AclUmfKMil 200«4« Savlngt r s s m s i s f ^ " ------T n t ------I Votai lr>cl »o«Tb«r" UnK Phy. Fin. Ptiy. Fhi, Phy. Fin. Phy, Fin. _ Phy. Fm, FH UnHeon Phy. Fin. Phy, Fin. Phy. FM. Unit coil Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. coil Phy. NPEGEL NoofEBBs No. of Urtwi tiums No.of clusters wvftred No of etustm in urban «ium« 1 Non Recuirinjs One Time Granl (TLEXibrary, Sports, 0 0 0.000 etc) 0 11.260 0.30 3 i;zoo 3 12.460 3 12.460 0 0.000 O.OOO 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 Model Cluster Grant (MCS) {One Ti.ne 0 0,000 0 0,000 Granl) 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 b Constniction 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Additional Room, Toilet. Drinking; 0 0,000 0 Water, Electrification 0 26.046 2.00 0 2.000 0 28.046 0 28.046 0 0.000 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 c One time Grant for life skill 0 0.000 0.00 3 6.000 3 6.000 3 6.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.0001 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Sub Total (Non-Reauring) 0 37.J0S'' 6 9.200 8 46.506 6 46.606 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.0001 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 RecturinK a Maintenance of MCS 0 0.000 0,30 1059 211.800 1059 211.800 1059 175.794 0 36.006 '0 .3 0 1059 211.8001 1059 211.80 0,30 1059 211.800 1059 211.800 Engaging of Instructor 0 0.000 0.30 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.dod 0 0.000 1 0 0.000 0 0.00 0 0,000 0 0.000 Computer with UPS for MCS 0 0.000 0.30 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o;'ooo 1 0.30 0 0.000 0 0.00 0,30 0 0,000 0 0.000 b Award to School/Teacher 0 0.000 0.30 10S9 52.950 1059 52.950 1059 43.84i9 0 9.002 0.05 1059 52,9501 1059 52,95 0,05 1059 52,950 1059 52.950 Student Evaluation, Alternative School etc. 0 0.000 0.30 1059 211.800 1059 211.800 1059 175.794 0 36.006 0.30 1059 211.800 1059 211,80 0,30 1059 211,800 1059 211.800 d Educational Tour 0 o.doo 0.30 0 0.000 0 O.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.30 0 0.000 0 0.00 0,30 0 0,000 0 0.000 e Teacher Training on gender aspects 0 0.000 0.30 0 O.OOO 0 d.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.00b 0.05 0 0.000 0 0,00 0,05 0 0.000 0 0.000 f L eaning through open schools 0 0.000 0.30 1059 158.850 1059 158.850 1059 73.071 0 85.779 0.30 1059 158.850 1059 158.85 0,30 1059 158.850 1059 158,850 Sub Total (Recuirliif^) 0 b.oob 1059 S35.40b 1059 638.400 ' 1059 4e8.60li ■ft 166i9} " T 0.000 1059 638.4001 1059 635.400 0 1.600 lbS9 635.400 1059 635.400 Additional Incentives (Uniform) Prinnary 0 0.000 0.000 0 o.boo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0. 0.00 0.00 0 115 0 1 8 0 r 0 1150.58 0,00 0,00054 193196 104.326 193196 104,326 Upper Primary 0.00 0 o.oool 0 0.00 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 Sub ToUl ' 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.ood 0 o.ooo b 0 ^ 0 0.000 0 1180.580) 0 1160.580 0 0.001 1931«t 104.328 193196 104.326 Community MobUlsation Management Cost 0 0.000 0.30 1059 41.020 1059 41.020 1059 34.047 0 6,973 0.00 1059 105.9001 1059 105.90 0.00 1059 47.220 1059 47,220 Sub ToUl (ComnuMobi+MKtCosI) 0 (>.00 1ciS9 41.02 1059 41^2 1059 34.0S b b'.sT 0 o.bb 10i!9 lo i^ o 1659 105.90 0 o.bi 1059 47.22 1059 47.22 Totai NPfiGBl 0 37306 10^9 685.620 1059 722.926 1059 5«9.1(S0 0 173.766 0 OMO 1059 1891.8801 1059 1891.880 0 0 1.661 1059 786.946 1059 78fi.»KS Bastar 6ija pu r Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Total incl. spill over Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation S.N. C om po n en t 2009-10 2009-10 Total Incl. spill over Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin, Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 b 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to UPS 0 142 142 0 0,000 0.00000 b 0.000 0 0,000 S u b Total 0 142 142 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New P^New telicJiers Salary SK-IH 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary SK-ll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 1 0 0 426 85.626 426 85,626 0 0,000 0,2010(b 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.03 New UPS teachers Salary Sk-ill o‘ 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 d.ooo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 6 0 b 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New UPS ieachers for UPS sanctioned in \ ' ' 2.05 0 0 0 2002-04 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,70000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 2.06 New AdSiiional Teacher Pri. §K-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.07 New Addl^ teacher - UPS SK-fi 0 (j.ood o.ooo()b 0 b.bbo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.boooo 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-ll 1 0 0.000 b.boodo 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New leachers-sklll W C yan Ilyoti having >40 2.09 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,16800 children 0 0.16800 60 10,080 60 10,080 ' Sul> Total 0 0 .0 0 0 426 85.626 426 85.626 0 0.000 60 10.080 60 10.080 Teacher* Salary (Recurring) 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1885 ISSS.W 1885 1583.400 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,84000 552 463.680 552 463,680 2.11 UPS Teasers Salary SK-ll 0 o'.ooo 0.98006 2 22 1 2176.580 2 2 2 1 izi're.sso 0 0 ,0 0 0 o,986ob 197 193.060 ig V 193,060 2.12 UPS Teachers Sal'aiy SK-III 0 b.ooo; b,8’4000 "58 ’48,720 58 4 fe,720 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.84000 83 69,720 83 69,720 2.16 Additional teacher PS SK-ill 0 o.ood 0.8400b 238 1^ 9.920 23^ 199,92bl 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,84000 0 0,00b b 0 .0 0 0 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-ll 0 0 .0 0 0 b .§ 8 i0 0 b 141 138.180 141 138,180 0 b.bbo 0.9^000 1 0 2 99,960 102' 99.960 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 6 0 .6 6 6 ' b.84b(5b 18l ’ 1^i.040 181 152,040 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,84000 79 66,360 79 66.360 2.18 Para Teacher ® 0 o.ooo' b.'ob'dlbo 0 b,bo(j 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 o'.boo 0.00000 0 0.000 0 b.dbo 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 S u b Total 0 6.6’do 4724 4298.840 *4724 4298.840 0 0.000 1013 892.780 1013 892.780 3 M. Teacher Grant 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0,00500 6694 33,470 6694 33.470 0 0 ,0 0 0 ■ 0,00500 1566 7,830 1566 7,830 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 6:0^0 o.obsbo 3361 16',^05 33^ 1'6,8b5 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,b0500 793 3,965 793i 3.965 S u b To tal 0 o.od6 10055 50.27S 10655 50.275 0 0.000 2359 11.795 2359 11.795 A B. Block Resource Centre ' 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 61 48.312 61 48,312 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,79200 23 18,216 23 18,216 4.02 Furniture Grant 6 0.000 b.sObob 0 b.oob 0 b.ooo 0 o.dbo 0,50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0" 0 ,0 0 0 4.03 Contfngency Grant 0 o.ooo 0.206iDb 12 2.4db 12 2’,46o 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,2 0 0 0 0 4 0.800 4 0,800 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0.()0d d.bgboS 12 1,080 12 1.08b b 0 .0 0 0 o.bbboo 4 0.360 4 0,360 4.05 TLM Grant 0 0.000 o.oSdoo' 12 0 ,^ 0 0 12 0,600 0 b.b'06 o,oSbbo 4 0 ,2 0 0 4 0 ,2 0 0 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 12 52.392 <2 52.3§2 0 0.000 4 19.576 4 19.576 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 6.01 Salary of RP 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.1 boob 0 0.000 "o 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,1 boob 0 0 ,0 0 0 o' 0 ,0 0 0 6.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0.03000 167 5,010 167 5,010 0 0 ,0 0 0 o,o^oob 53 l ' 59b 53 1."59b S.04 Meeting T.A. 0 6.000 0.03600 167 6.b l2 1 6 f 6,0'l2 0 o;ooo 0,03600 53 1,908 53 1.908 5.0S T L M Grant 0 o.o66 b.biobb 167 1,670 1 6 f 1,670 6" 0,000 0,01000 53 0,530 53 0.530 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 167 12.692 i e f 12.692 0 0.000 53 4.028 53 4.028 6 P. Te a c h e rs Tra inin g 6.01 Inservice (10 days at Block level) 0 O.QOO 0.01000 8206 82,060 8200 82.060 0 0,000 0.01000 2168 21,680 2168 21.680 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 b.doo 0.00500 8206 41.030 4 i ,030 0 0,000 0,00500 2168 10,840 2168 10,840 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 b.6“o'6 b.o"3obb 426 li^ ,78$ 12,780 0 0,000 0.03000 60 i , 8bb 6b 1,800 fRs. lakhs) Bastar §IJapur Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Reconvnehdatibn 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C om po n en t Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (60days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 6 0 0 0 1849 110.940 1849 110.940 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 191 11.460 131 11,460 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.0050(j 179 0.895 179 0.895 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 57 0.285 57 0,285 S u b To tal 0 0 .0 0 0 18866 247.705 1886^ 247.i^b5 0 0 .0 0 0 4644 46.065 4644 46.065 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 207 5.856 2071 5,856 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (il) N R B C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 363 10.269 363 1(>,269 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ■ 0 .0 0 0 (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 0 0 .0 0 0 a 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Resldentlal) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 ' 150 15.000 1 ^ 15.000 0 0.000 0,10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 4713 320.484 471^ 320.4^4 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,06800 3548 241.264 3548 241.264 (V i) Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06800 1820 123.760 18^ 123,7fe0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06800 5322 361,896 5322 361,896 S ub Total , 0 0 .0 0 0 7253 475.369 7253 475.369 0 0 .0 0 0 8870 603.160 8870 603.160 a Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 2 0 0 13509 27.018 13509 27.018 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 2 0 0 2668 5,336 2668 5,336 S u b To tal 0 b .o b o 13509 27.018 13509 27.018 0 0 .0 0 0 2668 5.336 2668 5.336 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00096 182775 175,464 182775 175.464 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 26212 25.164 26212 25,164 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00208 58756 1 2 2 ,2 1 ^ 58756 1 2 2 .2 1 2 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00208 6478 13,474 6478 13,474 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 241531 297.676 241531 297.676 0 0 .0 0 0 32690 38.638 32690 38.638 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0.000 0.01200 1755 21.060 1765 21.060 0 0.000 0,01200 961 11,532 961 11,532 S u b To tal 0 Q.OOO 1755 21.060 1755 21.060 0 0 .0 0 0 961 11.532 961 11.532 11 Civil Works 11.01 BRC 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 a 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.02 C R C 0 2.800 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 2.800 0 0 .0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 2.610 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 2,610 0 0 ,0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 1 2 .0 0 0 2.00000 0 0,000 0 1 2 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 41:3§9 §,17909 142 734.140 142 775,500 0 0 ,0 0 0 5,17000 0 0.600 0 0 ,0 0 0 Prefabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.05 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.oop 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for P’rimaiy Scrfiool sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper I’ rimary School sanctioned 11.09 0 2.586 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 2,586 0 0 ,0 0 0 5,17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 in previous years under S S A 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 125 250.000 126 250.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2,00000 75 150.000 75 150.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.12 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,25000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.odo 0 0 ,6 0 0 0,50000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.14 Water Facility 0 0 .0 0 0 0,(30000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o;ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.18 Head Master's Room Q 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.ooci 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.19 Ashramshaia (Residential Schools) 0 0 .0 0 0 36.65000 0 0,000 0 o.boo 0 0 .0 0 0 36.05000 12 432,600 12 432,600 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0,000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0,00000 0 o,ood 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.22 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 Q.OOO 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0()0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ______a O.OQQ 0 .0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. U P S students 0 0 .0 0 0 6 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 .0 6 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Sub Total(Civil Works) 0 61.356 342 1134.140 342 1195.496 0 0 .0 0 0 112 632.600 112 632.600 Furniture for Govt. UPS Bastar j1 Bijapur 1 Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Total Incl. spill over | Spill O v e r from S.N. C o m p o n e n t 2009-10 1 1 2008-091i Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 11 Total incl. spill over Phy. Fin. • Unit cost Phy. Fin. Pfry. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 f d.ood 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Sub Total(Fumlture) 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 o.oob 0 ' 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 Sub TotaF (Civil^Fumiture) 0 61.356 b.00^00 342 1134.140 342 1195.496 0 0.000 0.00500 112 632.600 112 632.600 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE-N ew Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 b.ooo 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 142 71.000 142 71.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 12.03 Other (TLE) ’ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.boooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 S u b Total 0 0.000 142 71.Odd 142 71.000 0 0.000 0 o.doo 0 0.000 13 I. Maintenance Grant 13.01 Maintenance Grant’ 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 3139 178.000 3139 178.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 730 ! 38.750 730 38.750 S u b To tal 0 o.o(^6 3139 178.000 3139 17^000 0 0.000 730 38.750 730 38.750 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0.020b0 2853 57.060 2853 57.060 0 0.000 0.02000 835 16.700 835 16.700 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 o.ooo b.b^oob' 1116 22.320 11'16 22.320 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 184 3.680 184 3.680 S u b Total 0 0.000 3969 T9.380 3969 79.380 b 0.000 loid 20.380 1019 20.380 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, EWiuafion,'Monitoring & 15.01 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 3969 51.597 3969 51.597 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 1019 13.247 1019 13.247 Supervision 0 S u b T o U l 0 0.000 3969 51.597 3969 51.597 9 Q-.QQQ 1019 13.24? 1019 13.247 16 jfisnsgimgntaMB 16.01 Management & MIS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 160.310 0 160.310 0 0.000 0.00000 0 89.240 0 89.240 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 o.boo o.bfiobb 0 149.000 “o1 149.000 b b.obo' 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 0 50.000 U) S u b To tal 0 d.obo 0 309.310 0 309.310 0 0.000 0 139.240 0 139.240 lo 17 G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 o.ooo 0.00000 1 15.000 15.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02|Girls Education 0 b.dob b.b’ddob 1 li.o d b 15.000 0 0.000 0,00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 b.bob' o.ooboo 1 15.000 i'S.dbo 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 I 1 17.04 Computer Education 0 o.obd o.bbobb 1 50.000 50.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 50.000 1 50.000 17.05 Urtsan deprived Children 0 o.obb o.bbbM ' 1 5.000 5.bdo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 5.000 1 5.000 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 1 ibd.bod 100.000 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0.000 o.oooeb 12610 7.566 12610 7.566 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00060 5038 3.023 5038 3.023 S u b Total 0 b.obo 12610 7.566 12610 7.566 0 0.000 5038 3.023 5038 3.023 To ta l S S A 0 61.356 322470 7499.647 7561.002 0 0.000 61241 2590.230 61241 2590.230 19 State Component 19.1 Nilanagement Cost 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 , 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 19.2 R E M S ' ’ 0 o.bob' 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 'd.boo 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 b 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 b'oob 0 b.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Total SSA-^State Component 0 61.356 0.000 61241 259b.23b 61241 2590.230 20 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 167 117.178 167 117.178 0 0.000 0.00000 53 35,330 ''53 35.330 Total NPEGEl 0 0.000 167 117.178 167 W ^.178 0 0 .000 53 35.330' 53 35.330 21 K G B V Total Non Recurring 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 12 306.840 12 306.840 0 0 .0 0 0 25,47000 5 i 127,i35b 5 127.350 Total KGBV 0 0.000 12 306.840 , 1 2 306.840 0 0.000 1 5 127.350 5 127.350 Grand Total (SSA-^NPEGEL'^KGBV) 0 61.356 0 0.000 31299 2752.910 61299 2752.910 (Rs. lakhs) Dantew ada Spill O v e r from 2006-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m p o n e n t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U n it co s t Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0.000 0.00000 6 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 o.ooo 0.00000 0 0.006 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1.03 Upgradation of PS to UPS 0 0.000 o.oodoo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.666 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 S ub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0.000 0.16800 0 0.000 0 0.000 6 6.660 0.16800 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary ^-11 0 0.000 0.20100 6 0.000 0 0.000 6 0.000 0,20100 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.03 New UPS Teacher# Salary Sk-lll 0 o.ooo 6.06060 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 o.doooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New Uf’S teasers for UPS sanctioned in 2.05 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 2002-04 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0.70000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0,000 0 0.000 2.06 New Additional Teacher Pri. SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.or Now Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.b{t New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New teachers-SKIII for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1 0 0 children 0.16800 0.16800 16.800 1 0 0 16.800 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 100 16.800 100 16.800 Teachers Salary (Recurring) 2.10 F'rimary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1118 939.120 ^ 1118 939.120 0 0 .0 0 0 0,84000 1134 952.560 1134 952.560 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 1412 1383.760 1412 13^3,760 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.98000 474 464.520 474 464.520 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 . 8 ^ 0 0 124 104.160 1 2 ? 164.160 0 6 .0 0 0 0,84000 119 99.960 119 99.960 2.15 Additional Teacher PS SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 2465 2070.600 2405 2070.600 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0,98000 1 0 0 98.600 1 0 0 98.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 148 145.040 148 145.040 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1 00 84.006 1 0 0 84.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 121 101.640 121 101.640 2.18 Para Teacher ® 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 O.OOO 0 0 .6 6 6 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00600 6 6 .0 0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Sub Total 0 0.000 5319 4679.640 5319 4679.640 0 0.000 1996 1763.720 1996 1763.720 3 M. T e a c h e r G ra n t 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 8538 42.690 8538 42.690 0 0.660 0.00500 2753 13.765 2753 13.765 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 5054 25.270 505^ 25.270 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 1408 7.040 1408 7.040 S u b Total 0 0.000 135Si2 67.960 13592 67.960 0 0.000 4161 20.805 4161 20.805 4 B. Block Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 38 30.096 38 30.096 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 37 29.304 37 29.304 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 6 0 .0 0 0 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0.20000 10 2 ,0 0 0 10 2.006 0 0 .0 0 0 0,20006 7 1.400 7 1.400 4.04 fleeting T.A. 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 10 0.900 10 6.900 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 7 0.630 7 0,630 4.05 T L M Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 10 0,500 '■ 1 0 0.500 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 7 0.350 7 0.350 S ub To tal 0 0.000 10 33.496 10 33.496 0 0.000 7 31.684 7 31.684 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 6.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 152 4.560 152 4.560 0 0 .0 0 0 6.03000 96 2.880 ' 96 2.880 5.04 Meeting T.A, 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 152 5.472 152 5.472 6 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 96 3.456 96 3.456 5.05 T L M Grant 0 0.000 0.01000 152 1.520 152 1.52(3 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 96 0.960 96 0.960 Sub TotaV 0 0.000 152 11.552 152 11.552 0 0.000 96 7.296 96 7.296 6 P. Te a c h e rs Tra in in g 6.01 Insen/ice (10 days at Block level) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 1 0 0 0 13451 134.510 13451 134,510 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01000 3938 39.380 3938 39.380 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 6 .0 0 0 0.00500 13451 67.255 13451 67.255 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06500 3938 19.690 3938 19.690 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.03000 100 3.000 1 00 3.000 (i'lS. lai(ns) , B ilaspur Dantewada Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Toital incl. spill over S pill O v e r from 2008-09 S.N. C om po nent 2009-10 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. PHy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (60days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06000 141 8.460 141 8,460 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 223 13.380 223 13.380 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 162 0.810 162 0,810 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 103 0.5 l '5 103 0.S 15 S u b To ta l d 0 .0 0 0 27205 211.035 27205 211.035 0 0 .0 0 0 8302 75.965 8302 75.965 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,02829 962 27,215 062 27.215 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (ii) N R B C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 , 761 21,529 761 21.529 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 a 0 ,0 0 0 (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 1 00 5.000 1 00 5.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (iv ) Dormilory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0.10000 2 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 ,0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (P S ) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 350 2 I 8 O 6 350 23.800 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 3936 267.648 3936 267,648 (V i) Bridge Course ResTderitial (U P ) 6 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 6 8 0 0 2 0 1.360 2 0 1,360 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 5871 399.228 5871 399.228 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 2193 78.904 2193 78.904 0 0 .0 0 0 10007 686.876 10007 686.876 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 2 0 0 20668 41,336 20068 41,336 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 4892 9.784 4892 9,784 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 20668 41.336 20668 41.336 0 0 .0 0 0 4892 9.784 4892 9.784 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Bool^P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 255552 245,330 i 55552 245,330 0 0 .0 0 0 0:00096 67174 64.487 87174 g 4 ,48? 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) Q 0:000 0,00206 835B8 173,801 173,801 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00208 15727 3 i 7 i 2 15f271 32,712 S u b To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 39d11Q 418.^31 339’il O 419:131 0 0.000 82901 97.199 82901 97.199 1 " ■' • 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.01200 4280 51.360 4280 51.360 0 0.000 0,01200 1852 22.224 1852 22,224 S u b To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 4280 51.360 4280 51.360 0 0 .0 0 0 1852 22.224 1852 22.224 11 Civil Works 11.01 BR C 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 6 6 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.02 C R C 0 o.c)b6 zdbbdo 0 0 .D 0 6 0 0 .0 0 6 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0,000 0 0.000 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 O' 0 .0 0 0 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .6 6 6 0 0 0 6 :0 6 6 0 0.000 0 0,000 2.OOOOO 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 6 .0 0 0 5,1760b 0 6,ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5 ,1 7 6 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 Prefabricated School Building In Dantewada 11.06 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 '0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0,000 district (600 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0,000 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sariction^ iri 11.08 0 0.000 4,65000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sankibned 11.0S 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5,17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 in previous years under S S A 11.10Additional Class Room(PS) 0 olobo 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 400 800,000 400 800.000 0 0.000 2.00000 175 3'50.006 175 350,000 11.11Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2.00000 107 214,000 i 07 i 14.660 0 0 .0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 1 00 2 0 0 .0 0 0 1 00 2 0 6 .0 6 0 11.12 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,006 0 0 ,6 0 6 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,6 0 6 6 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ''6 “'b.606 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 O.OOO 0 .5 0 6 6 6 0 0:60b 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 O.OOO 11.14 Water Facility 0 o.dod o.ooobd 0 6.666 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 6 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000, 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 0 .0 0 0 o,o0do0 0 6 .0 6 6 0 ,6 6 0 0 0.000 0,00000 ! 6’ 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.18 Head Master's Room 0 d.ddb O,6o(366 0 6 .0 0 6 0 0 .660^ 0 0 .6 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.19 Ashramshaia (Residential Schools^ " 0 0 .0 0 0 36,b5d66 0 0 ,0 6 0 ' 0 .6 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 36.05000 39 1405,950 39 1405,950 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 ,0 0 0 50,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 6 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 43,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 O' 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 6 11.22 B A l^ Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,6 0 0 0 6 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 6 ,6 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0,000 0,00000 0 6 .0 0 0 6 0 .0 6 0 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govl. UPS students 0 o.65() 0.00000 ■'0 6.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.oOo 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ’ o' 0 .0 0 0 Sub ToUKCivil Works 0 0 .0 0 0 507 1014.000 507 1014.000 0 0 .0 0 0 314 1955.950 314 1955.950 Furniture for Govt. UPS ' (Rs. lakhs) ^lla s p u r 1 Dantewada | Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 |1 Total Ind. spill over iSpill Over from 2008-09{1 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 |1 Total incl. spill over | S.N. C o m po n en t ...... Phy. Fin. Unit cost ] Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Sub Total(Fumlture> 0 0.000 0.00500 0 o.ood 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 b.boo b 0.000 Sub Total (Civli+Fumitur«> 0 o.o'bd b.ods6o 507 1014.000 507 1014.000 0 0.000 0.00500 314 1955.950 314 1955.950 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.'ooo 0 ' 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 O.OOO o.oobdo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 o.obo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.00b b o.bbb 13 1. M aintenance Grant 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 3301 238.350 3301 238.350 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 1601 84.950 1601 84.950 S u b Total 0 0.000 3301 238.350 3ison 238.350 0 0.00b 1S01 84.950 1601 84.950 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 2557 51.140 2557 51.140 0 0.000 0.02000 1449 28,980 1449 28.980 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.02000 1072 21.440 107? 21.440 0 0.000 0.02000 349 6.980 349 6.980 S u b Total 0 0.000 3629 72.580 3629 72.580 0 0.000 1798 35.960 1798 35.960 IS K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 3629 47.177 0 0 .0 0 0 0,01300 Supervision 3629 47.177 1798 23.374 1798 23.374 S u b Total 0 0.000 3629 47.177 3629 47.177 0 o.bbb 1798 23.374 1798 23.374 16 Management & M IS' 16.01 Management & MIS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 143.790 1 143.790 0 0.000 0.00000 0 117,000 0 117.000 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0.000 0.00000 0 147.0f00 0 147.000 0 0.000 0.00000 6! 102.000 0 102.000 S u b Total 0| 0.000 1 290.790 1 2^.790 0 0.000 i 0 2i9.bbb 0 219.000 lV G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 Ig.OOO 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooobo 1 15.000 1 15,000 17.04 Computer Education 0 0.000 0.00000 1 50.000 1 50.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 50.000 1 50,000 17.05 Urban deprived Children 0 o.doo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 5.000 1 5.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 5.000 1 5,000 Sub Total Innovation !' b 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 0 0.000 1 1 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 0 0 .0 0 0 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0 .0 0 0 ! 0.00060 ^3746 ' 8.248 13746 8.248 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 6012 3.607 6012 3,607 S ub Total 0 0.000 13746 8.248 13746 8.248 0 0.000 ' 6012 3.607 6012 3.607 To tal S S A 0 0.000 437343 7365.558 7365.558 0 0.000 125838 5155.194 125838 5155.194 19 State Component 19.1 Management Cost 0 q.ooo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ' 19,2 REMS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 i b.ooo (0 0 .0 0 0 0 6 .0 6 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0 .0 0 0 0 b.odo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0 .0 0 0 Total SSA-*-State Component 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 125838 5155.194 125838 5155.194 20 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 152 122.060 152 122.060 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 96 66.951 96 66.951 Total NPEGEL 0 0 .000 152 1^060 152 122.060 0 0 .000 96 66.951 96 66.951 211 KGBV I Total Non Recurring 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 10 248.280 10 248.280 0 0.000 25.47000 7 178.290 7 178.290 T o t a l K G B V 0 0.000 10 248.280 10 248.280 0 0.000 7 178.290 7 178.290 Grand Total (SSA*NPEGEL+KGBV) 0.000 437505 7735.898 7735.898 0 0.600 1 125941 54bb.436 125941 5400.436 — ^ bham tari D urg Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Tottfl incl. spill over Spill Over from S.N. C om po n en t 2009-10 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0.000 ' 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 New Primary Schoollfbr >25 d f lld r ^ ) 0 0 .0 0 0 o .b b o o o 0 b .b o o 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o .d d o 1.03 Upgradatlon of PS to UPS 0 c ).6 6 o 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o .b o o ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 o .o O o 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.02 New UP§ teachers sS a ^ SK-ll' 0 0.000 0.20100 0 o .o o o 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o .b b d 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lil 0 O.obd 0.00000 0 o .o o o ' 0 0.005 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 o.()bo (D.bobob 0 o .b d d 0 o .b o d 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 New U P § teachers for UI^S sanctioned in 2.05 0 2002-04 0 0 .0 0 0 00000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.06 New Additional teacher"Pri. SK-lil 0 'o.ooo 0.00000 0 o .b d o 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-ll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 b .o o o d b 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 i x i i New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o .d o d 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 New teachers-SKlIl for Gyari Jyoti having >45 2.09 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.16800 0 .0 0 0 0,000 children ' 0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 Ttachsrt Sa\arv (Recurring) 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 405 340.200 405 340.200 0 0.000 0.84000 314 263.760 314 263,760 l/J £ i i UPS Teachers Salary sR -lF 0 o":o(i>6 (D.&8l )00 '549 538^020 ' ^ 549 538.020 0 o .o o b 0.9^000 1201 1176.980 1201 1176,980 •-J 2.12 UPS Teachers Saia^ SK-Ill 0 d .b b o 0.84000 87 73.080 ■ ^ 'W 7 l0 8 b 0 0.000 0.84000 146 122,640 U 6 ■f^2.640 2.15 Additional Teacher PS SK-ill 0 o .o d o 0.84000 323 271.320 0 0.000 0.84000 1798 1510,320 1798 1510.320 2.16 Additional Teacher (JPS SK-il "o o .b o b o .b s b b b 180 176.40b 180 176.40d 0 0.000 0.98000 346 339.080 346 339.080 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 0 o .o b o 0.84000 40 33,600 '40 3 ^6 0 0 0 0.000 0.84000 200 168,000 20d 168.dd0 2.18 Para Teacher 4 0 o .b b b c i.o o b o (i 0 d .o d o ■ 0 b .'od o 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 b .b o o o .o o b d (5 0 o .o o d 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o d d o d 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0.000 1584 1432.620 15$4 1432.620 0 0.000 4005 3580.730 4005 3580.780 3 M. Te a c h e r Grant 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 2721 13.605 2721 13.605 0 0.000 0.00500 8315 41,575 8315 41,575 3.02 Upper Prirnary teacher Grant 0 o .o o b 0.00500 i830 9.150 1830 9.150 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 5902 29,510 5902 29,510 S u b Total 0 o .o o d 4551 22.755 4551 22.755 0 0.000 14217 71.085 14217 71.085 A B. Block Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 240 190,080 240 190,080 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 o.soobo 0 d .b o o 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 o 'o d b b 0 ,0 0 0 4.03 Contingency Grant ...... o .b b b o "2 d 6 o b 4 '0.800 '4 0.800 0 0.000 0.20000 12 2,400 l '2 2,400 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 4 0.360 4 0.360 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 12 1,080 12 1,080 4.0S t L m Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 4 0 .2 0 0 4 0 .2 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 12 0,600 12 6 ,6 b b S u b Total 0 0.000 4 1.360 4 1.360 0 0.000 1 2 194.160 12 194.160 £ C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 b.ooo d .ib b o b 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.10000 0 d.ob'D '6 o .o d b 5.02 Contingency Grant 0 o .b b o 0.03000 81 2.430 81 2’.430 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 223 6.690 223 6.690 5.04 Meeting T.A . 0 0.000 0.03600 81 2.916 81 2.916 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 223 8,028 223 8,028 5.0j T L M Grant 0 o.o'bo d.oido'b 81 0.810 81 0.8lb 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 223 2,230 223 2,ii3b S ub Total 0 0.000 81 6.-iS6 81 6.156 0 0.000 223 16.948 223 16.948 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservice (10 days at Block ie v e l)'^ 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 3279 32.790 3279 32.790 0 0.000 0.01000 14217 142.170 14217 142,170 6.02 Inservice (10 days at fluster) ...... 6 0 .0 0 0 o .d d s o o 327b 16.3^5 3279 1%.395 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 14217 71.08d i 4i i V 71,085 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 0 .0 0 0 ' 0.030d0 . 0 0 .0 0 0 ' ■ 'o ’ 6 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 b 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 (Rs. lakhs) b h a m ta ^ Durg Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recomrriendatlon 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t 1 Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (SOdays) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06000 1272 76.320 1272 76,320 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,06000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 6.06 Other (DRG/8RG/CRG) (5days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 85 o !425 85 0.425 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 235 1,175 235 1.175 ' Sub Total 0 0.000 7915 125.930 7915 125.930 0 0.000 28669 214.430 28669 214.430 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,02829 948 26.819 948 26.819 (il) N R B C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 o'.ooo 0 o.ooo 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.02829 989 27,979 989 27.979 (HI) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 31 1.550 31 1,550 0 0 .0 0 0 0,05000 50 2.500 50 2,500 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residentlal) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.10000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 550 37.400 550 37.400 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 133 9,044 133 9,044 ( V i) Bridge Course Residential (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06800 177 12.036 12.036 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 217 14,756 217 14,756 S ub Total 0 0.000 758 50.986 758 50.986 0 0.000 2337 81.098 2337 81.098 S Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 7388 14,776 7388 14,776 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 21742 43.484 21742 43,484 S ub Total 0 0.000 7388 14.776 73B8 14.776 0 0.000 21742 43.484 21742 43.484 9 F. Free Text Bool< 9.01 Free Text Book(P) ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 71214 68,365 71214 68,365 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 203989 195,829. 203989 195,829 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208 33914 70,541 33914 70.541 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208 102510 213,221 102510 213,221 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 105128 138.907 105128 138.907 0 0.000 306499 409.050 306499 409.050 Lr-' 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0.000 0,01200 1445 17.340 1445 17,340 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 2 0 0 6102 73.224 6102 73,224 S u b To tal 0 0.000 1445 17.340 1445 17.340 0 0.000 6102 73.224 6102 73.224 11 Civil Works 11.01 BRC 0 0 .0 0 0 4,00000 0 0.000 0 O.OGO 0 6 .0 0 6 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.02 C R C 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 16,600 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 16,600 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.04 Primary School (10 diildren) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Prefabri«ted School Building in Oantawada 11.06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0.000, 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 previous years under SSA (10 children) Buildirig for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 4.650 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 4,650 previous vears under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sar^ctioned 11.09 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 16.000 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 16,000 in previous years under SSA 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0.000 2.00000 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 300 600.000 300 600,000 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2.00000 100 200.000 1 0 0 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 300 600,000 300 600.000 11.12 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 6 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 o.()ob 0,50006 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0 0,000 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.14 Water Facility 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.600 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0.000 o,bo6oci 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0.000 0,00000 0 6,006 0 0.000 0 0,006 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.17 Electrification 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.18 Head Master's Room 0 o.obo O,O0OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.19 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 0 .0 0 0 36,05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 36.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.22 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0.000 0,00000 ! 0 0 ,0 0 0 5 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 6,600 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Sub TotaKCivil Works) 0 0.000 150 300.000 150 300.000 0 37.250 600 1 2 0 0 .0 0 0 600 1237.250 Pumlture for Govt. UPS Dhamtari | b u rg 1 Spill O v e r fro m 2008-091 Fresh Recommendation TotAl inci. spill over ]rspiil O v e r from 2008-091 S.N. C o m po n en t 2009*10 | 1 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 1 Total incl. spill over Phy. Pin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. ! Fin. Unit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0.000 0,00600 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00500 0 0.06b 0 0,000 Sub Total(Fumitura) 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 d.oob 0 0.000 0.00500 0 r b.obo 0 0.000 Sub Total (Civii+Fumitura) 0 o'.obb o.bbsbo 150 300.000 150 300.000 0 37.250 b.dbsoo 600 1200.000 60b 1237.250 12 0 . Teaching Learning'Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0,000 0 I 0,000 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 b .o o d b.^b c^b o 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.50000 0 0,000 0 0.000 12.03 Other (TL E )' o' 0.000 b .S o b b o 0 o .b b b 0 0.000* 0 o.ooo o.bdbbo 0 0,000 0 0.000 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 1 b 0.000 0 0.000 13 1. Maintenance Grant j 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 O.OOO 0.07500 1327 93.550 1327 93.550 0 0.000 0.07500 1 3181 ^ 224!050 3181 224,050 S u b Total 0 b.obb 1327 iz .5 S o i i ^ ' 93.550 0 0.000 3181 224.050 3181 224.050 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.02000 908 18.160 908 18.160 0 0.000 0,02000 2306 46,120 2306 46.120 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 0.000 o .b i2 d o6 452 9.040 452 9.040 0 0.000 0.02000 1157 23.140 f 157 2^140 S ub To tal 0 0.000 1360 27.200 1^60 27.200 0 0.000 3463 69.260 "3463 69.260 15 K> Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 1360 17.680 0 0 .0 0 0 0,01300 Supervision 0.01300 1360 17.680 3463 45.019 3463 45.019 S ub Total 0 0.000 1360 17.680 1360 17.680 0 0.000 3463 45.019 3463 45.019 16 Management & MIS ...... ' 16.01 Management & n2lS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 85,540 0 85.54Q 0 0.000 0,00000 0 163.670 0 1 163,670 16.02 [©awing Enhanesmeht Programme 0 .0 0 0 1 6:06000 0 48?0b0 0 48.000 0 1 o.ooo 0.00000 0 132.000 0 132.000 S u b to ta l 0 0.000 0 133.540 0 133.540 0 O.OOO 0 295.670 0 ^95.670 ir G. Innovative Activity 17.01 E C C E ' 0 0.006 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 15.000 01 0.000 0,00000 1 15.000 1 15,000 17.02 ^irls Education 0 b .b b o o .b b b b o ' i ' is .'b b b 1 iS.bbo'i 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 1 i 5.o b o i 1 15,000 l t .03 SC/fet Education 0 o .o b b o .b b o b o 1 i^.bbo 1 15.000 o' 0.000 0,00000 1 15.000 1 15,'obo 17.04 Computer Education 6 0.000 0.00000 1 50.000 1 50.b00 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 ,0 6 0 1 50,000 17.C6 Urban deprived'ChUdren 0 0.6W o .o b b o o 1 5.66b 1 5.00 b 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OOOOO 1 5,000 1 5,000 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 1 i c d .o d b 1 100.000 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 lo b .o b b 18 Q. Community Mobilization \ ‘ 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0.000 0,00060 5320 3.192 5320 3.192 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00060 12502 7,501 12502 7,501 S u b Total 0 0.000 5320 3.192 5320 3.192 0 0.000 12502 7.501 12 50i 7.501 To tal S S A 0 b.bbb 1383172 248^.9d2 1383^2 248^.992 0 37.250 407016 6625.759 407016 6663.009 IS State Component 19.1 Management Cost ' 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 19.2 R E M § 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 b .o b o ...... 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.ooo 0,00000 0 b,bbo 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 ,0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Total SSA-i-State Component 0 0.000 138372 2485.992 138372 2485.992 0 37.250 407016 6625.759 407016 6663.009 20 NPEGEL 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0,00000 17 29,493 17 29.493 Votal NPEGEL 0 0.000 1 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 17 29.493 17 29.493 2i KGBV Total Non Reciinin^ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 o,oooOo 0 0.000 0 0.000 Total Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 2 50.940 2 50.940 0 0,000 0.00000 3 76,410 3 76.410 T o t a l K G B V 0 0.000 2 50.940 2 50.940 0 0 .000 3 76.410 3 76.410 Grand Total (SSA'^NPEGEL-^KGBV) 0 0.000 0 37.250 407036 6 7 3 I 6 6 2 ' 407036 6768.912 (Rs. lakhs) Janjgir Jashpur Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommmdatlon 2009-10 Total inci. spill over Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2008-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy, Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 b.oodoo 0 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.dOo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to UPS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S ub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.02 New UPS teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,2 0 1 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.03 New U P S Teachers Salary Sl<-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0 .0 0 0 New U P S teachers for U P S sanctioned in 2.05 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2002-04 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 'o 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.06 New Additional Teacher Pri. SK-lll 0 o.oob 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.07 New AddI, Teacher - UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New teachers-SKIll for Gyan jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 children 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ' S u b T o u t 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Teachers Salary (Recurring ) 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 880 739.200 830 739.200 0 0 .0 0 0 0,84000 1373 1153,320 1373 1153.320 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 d.oob 0.98000 1207 1182.860 1207] 1182.860 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 6 8 8 674,240 6 8 8 674.240 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 98 82.3^0 98 82.320 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 71 59,640 71 59.640 2.15 Additional Teacher PS SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1255 1054.200 1265 1054.200 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 25 24.500 25 24,500 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 843 708.120 843 708.120 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.84000 35 29.400 35 29.400 2.18 Para Teacher ® 0 0 .0 0 0 o.oodoo 0 0.000 0 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 4283 3766.700 42^3 3766.700 0 0.000 2192 1941.100 2192 1941.100 3 M. Te a c h e r G ra n t 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 4663 23.315 4663 23.315 0 0 .0 0 0 •0.00500 4038 20,190 4038 20,190 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 3175 15.875 3175 15.875 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 1823 9.115 1823 9,115 S u b T o U l 0 0.000 7838 39.190 7838 39.190 0 0.000 5861 29.305 5861 29.305 4 B. Block Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 o.ooo 0.79200 75 59.400 75 59.400 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 64 50.688 64 50.688 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.50000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0.20000 9 1.800 9 1.800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 8 1,600 8 1,600 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0.000 0.09000 9 0.810 9 0.810 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 8 0.720 8 0,720 4.05 T L M Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 O.O5O0O 9 0.450 9 0.450 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 8 0,400 8 0.400 S u b Total 0 0.000 9 62.460 9 62.460 0 0.000 8 53.408 8 53.408 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 6.10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 96 2.880 96 2.880 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 8 8 2.640 8 8 2,640 5.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 96 3.456 96 3.456 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 8 8 3,168 8 8 3,168 5.05 TLM Grant 0 0.000 0.01000 96 0.960 96 0.960 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 8 8 0,880 8 8 0.880 S u b To tal 0 0.000 96 7.296 96 7.296 0 0.000 8 8 6 .6 8 8 8 8 6 .6 8 8 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservice (10 days at Block level) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 7518 75.180 7518 75.180 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 4340 43,400 4340 43.400 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 7518 37.590 7518 37.590 0 o.dod 0,00500 4340 21,700 4340 21.700 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,03000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 JanjgTr Ja s h p u r Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Totail incl, spill over Spill Over from S.N. C o m po n en t 2009-10 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin, Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (60days| 0 0.000 0.06000 320 19.200 3 2 0 19,200 0 0.000 0.06000 1521 91.260 1521 91.260 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0.000 0.00500 105 0.525 ' 105 0,525 d 0.000 o.bdsoo S6 0.480 96 0.480 S u b Total 0 0.000 15461 132.495 1 5 4 ^ 132.495 0 0:060 10297 156.840 102i97 156.840 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 Alfi (I) N R B C (P ) 0 o.ooo 0,02829 0 0.000 ...... 0 0,000 0 0.000 0.02829 0 0.000 0 o.ddo (ii) N R B O (U P ) 0 0.000 0.“02829 412 11.655 412 11,655 0 o.ddd 0.02829 0 0.000 0 o.ddd (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0.000 0.05000 200 10.000 200 lO.dOO d 0.000 0.05000 0 0.000 9 0 .0 0 0 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 o.ddd 0 0 ,0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 2dd 2 0 .0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Resid'entiaf (P^') 0 0 .0 6 0 6,06800 84 5.712 84 5.712 0 o.dbo 0.0680d 0 o.bbd d 0 .0 0 0 (Vi) Bridge Course Residential (tlP) 0 0 .0 6 6 0.06800 1 00 6:'8dd 1 0 0 6.800 b d.ddd d.d68dd 758 51.544 758 5’1.544 S u b Total 0.000 796 34.167 706 34.167 0 6.660 958 71.544 ^58 71.544 8 RemediarTeaching 8.01 RemediafY eaching 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 12514 25.028 12514 25.028 0 0 .0 0 0 d.0d200 5618 11,236 5618 11.236 ^ S u b Total 0 0.000 12514 25.02d 12514 25.028 0 0.000 5618 11.236 5618 11.236 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,6o 096 150051 144.049 150051 144,049 d 0 ,0 0 0 0.00096 91301 87,649 913d 1 87.649 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 O.O0(D 0.00208 65703 136.662 6'57'03 136,662 0 8-.0Ge d.00208 38790 80.§83 % m % S u b To tal 0 0.000 215754 280.711 215754 280.711 6 0.000 130091 168.332 130091 168.332 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 1 2 0 0 1665 19.980 1665 19,980 0 O .OdO 0.01200 1967 23.604 1967 23.604 j: S u b Total 0 0.000 1665 19.980 1 6 ^ 19.980 0 0.000 1967 23.604 1967 23.604 11 Civil Works 11.01 B R C 0 0 .0 0 0 4,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.odd 11.02CRC 0 0:700 2,obo66 b ■ ' 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,700 b 0 .0 0 0 2.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 o.ob'b 4,650bb 0 o,bob 0 0,060 0 o.dob' 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 b O .O dd 11.04 Primary StJiool (10 children) 0 o.(5do 2.obc?bo 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o,odo 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.ooo 6 d.ddd 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 0 .6 6 6 5,17000 0 “o.ddb‘ 0 ' 0,60b b 0 .0 0 0 5.17dd0 0 b.obb 0 0 .0 0 0 t>refabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 o.ddddd 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 25.850 4.65000 0 o,odo 0 25.850 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sanctioned 11.OS 0 20.640 5,17000 0 0,000 0 20.640 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 in previous years under SSA 11.1t Additional Class Room(PS) 0 46.6ob 2,6000b 250 500.000 250 546,000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 100 200,000 100 2 0 0 .0 0 0 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 o'.oo'o 2,00000 ' 100 2 0 0 .0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o,odo 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 50 lOd.bbd 11.1J Toiiet/Urinals(PS) d o.odo 6,6o66b ...... 0 ,0 0 0 "0 d.ddd o' 0,000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 d.ddd 11.13 Separate Girls toilet ^ ' 0 '0 .6 0 0 0,50000 0 6,00b 0 d.ddb d d,ddo 0,50ddb 0 0 .0 6 6 ' 0 d.ddd 11.14 Water Facility 0 0 .0 0 0 o,o6b6b 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 d.dod 0 d.ooo 11.1J Boundary Wiall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 . 11.1£ Separation Wall 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.bob d 0 .0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 "0 .0 0 0 o.ohood 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 ii.ie Head Mastei's Room 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 oodb 0 0 .0 0 0 0 d.ooo 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 11.1S Ashramshaia (Residential Schools) 0 '0 :6 0 0 ae.olsdbo 0 d.obo 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 36.050b0 0 b.boo o' o.bbb 11.2C Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 o.odddo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 d,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.odd 0 o.ddd 11.25 BALA Concept (in Govt, UPS) 0 o.obo 0 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ...... 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 d d.ooo 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 d.obO 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 o.odooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o,odd 0 0 .0 0 0 d 0 .0 0 0 d. 06000 0 o.ddd d d.ooo Sub Total(Civil Works] 0 93.190 350 700.000 350 793.190 0 0.000 150 300.000 150 300.000 Furniture for Govt. UPS — 1------Ja n jg ir 1 Ja s h p u r | Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 1 Totat incl. spill over ISpfll O v e r fro m 2008-0911 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 1 Total incl. spill over 1 S.N. C o m p o n e n t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00500 0 0.000 0 0,000 Sub Total(Fumiture) 0 o.ooo 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 Sub Total (Clvil+Fumiture) 0 93.190 0.00500 350 700.000 350 793.190 0 0.000 0.00500 150 300.000 150 300.000 12 O. Teaching Learning Equipment ' ' 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 13 1. M aintenance G ra n t 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 2171 145.100 2171 145.100 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 2266 121.450 2266 121.450 S u b Total 0 0.000 2171 145.100 2171 145.100 0 0.000 2266 121.450 2266 121.450 14 L. SchopI Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.02000 1625 32.500 1625 32.500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 1870 37.400 1870 37.400 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant ‘ 0 0.000 0.02000 792 15.840 792 15.840 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 517 10.340 517 10.340 S u b To tal 0 0.000 2417 48.340 2417 48.340 0 0.000 2387 47.740 2387 47.740 15|K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation^ Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 2417 31.421 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 2387 Supervision 2417 31.421 31.031 2387 31.031 S u b Total 0 0.000 2417 31.421 2417 31.421 0 0.000 2387 31.031 2387 31.031 1ft M anagem ent & MIS 16.01 Management & MIS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 132.620 0 132.620 0 boooi 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 124.330 0 124.330 .i: 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0 .0 0 0 o.oodoo 0 1 1 0 .0 0 0 0 1 1 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 65,000 0 65.000 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 242.620 0 242.620 0 0.000 0 189.330 0 189.330 - r 17 G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0 .0 0 0 o.odooo 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooobo i 15.000 1 15.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.04 Computer Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 50.000 1 50.000 0 o.obo o.ooooo 1 50.000 1 50.000 17.05 Urban deprived Children 0 0.000 0,00000 1 5,000 1 5.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 5.000 1 5.000 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 8494 5.096 8494 5.096 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 7838 4.703 7838 4.703 S ub Total 0 0.000 ! 8494 5.096 8494 5.096 0 0.000 7838 4.703 7838 4.703 To tal S S A 0 93.190 5640.605 5733.795 0 0.000 172109 1 3256.311 172109 3256.311 19 State Component 1 19.1 Management Cost 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 19.2 REMS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 S ub Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 f Total SSA+State Component 0 93.190 0 o.odo 172109 3256.^11 172109 3256.311 20 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ’ 8 6,685 8 6.685 0 0.000 0,00000r 30 20,935 30 20.935 Total NPEGEL 0 0 .000 8 6.685 8 6.685 0 0.000 30 20.935 30 20.935 21 K G B V ' Total Non Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 7 178.290 ■ 1 7 178.290 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 3 76,410 3 76,410 Total KGBV 0 0.000 7 178.290 7 178.290 0 0.000 3 76.410 3 76.410 Grand Total (SSA-^NPEGEL+KGBV) 0 93.190 274281 5918.770 0 0.000 172142 3353.656 172142 3353.656 Kawardha Spill O v e r fro m 2608-09 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Fresh Recommendation 2009*10 Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Incl. soili over Phy. Fin. U n it co st Phy. Fin. Phy, Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 O 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 childreh) 0 0.b(D0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.ooo 0 0 :0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 1.03 Upgradatio'n of PS to U P S 0 0 .6 0 0 0 .6 6 6 0 0 33 O.OO6 33 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 O.06O06 5 0 .0 0 0 5 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 33 33 0 5 5 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 O 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16300 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary'SK-lf 0 d.ood 6 .2 0 1 0 0 99 19.899 99 1§.899 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 1 0 0 15 3 .0 1 6 15 3.015 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 6 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o;ooo O 0.000 0 o'oOO O.OOOOO 0 o.oOO 6 0.000 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0.000 0 .6 0 6 6 0 0 0.000 O 0.000 0 6.000 0.60000 0 0.000 6 0.000 N ^ C)PS teachers for UPS sanctioned in 2.05 0 0 2002-04 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0.000 6 .6 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.06 New Additional Teacher FVi. SK-fil 0 0.000 6 .6 0 0 0 6 0 6.600 O 0 :0 6 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS Sk-ll 0 0.000 0.00000 0 O'.OOO 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 6 0 0.000 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-llI 0 o.boo 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 New teachers-SKIII for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 O 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.16800 0 children 0.16800 0.000 0 0.000 S u b To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 99 19.899 9 9 19.899 0 0 .0 0 0 15 3.015 15 3.015 Teachers Salary (Recuning) ■ 1/^ 2.101 PriiTiary Teachers Salary SK-lli 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1105 928.200 1105 928.200 0 0 .0 6 6 0.84000 592 497.280 592 497.280 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 6.98'6o 6 803 786.940 803 786.940 0 0 .0 6 0 0.98000 1039 1018.220 1039 I6 T 8 .2 2 6 2.12 UPS Teachers Sala'ry SK-III 0 0 .0 6 0 0.84000 31 - 31 26.040 0 0 .6 0 0 0 .8 4 6 0 6 56 4 7 .6 4 0 56 47.040 2.15 Additional^eacher PS SR-III 0 o".66o' 0.84000 100 84.000 ■ 100 g4.o6o 0 O.OOO 0.84000 384 322.560 3841 322.560 2.16 Additionai^eacher UPS SK-II 0 0 .6 0 0 0.98000 '50 4f .000 ■ ■ I g j 49.000 0 0 .6 6 0 0.98000 59 57.820 59 57.'820 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 0 0 .0 6 0 0.84000 20 16.800 20 16.800 0 0.000 0.84000 28 23.520 2 8 23.520 2.18 Para Teacher® 0 0.000 0 .0 0 6 0 0 0 0.000 o 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.ooo o 0.000 0 orooo 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 S ub Total 0 o.odo 2109 1890.980 2109 1890.986 0 0 .0 0 0 2158 1966.~ ka n ke r kaw ardha Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total inci. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (60days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 164 9.840 164 9.840 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 301 18,060 301 18,080 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 131 0.655 131 0.655 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 59 0,295 59 0,295 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 11746 98.605 11746 98.605 0 0 .0 0 0 8473 79.540 8473 79.540 ■ ■ r 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 218 6.167 i218 6.167 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 (ii) N R B C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 1>9 5.064 179 5.064 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0,000 0 0.000 (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.05000 300 15,000 300 15.000 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 200 20.000 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ■ 0 .0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 111 7.548 111 7.548 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 1085 73,780 1085 73.780 (V i) Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 191 12.9§8 191 12.9'88 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 388 26.384 388 26,384 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 899 51.7^7 899 51.767 0 0 .0 0 0 1773 115.164 1773 115.164 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 6292 12.584 6292 12.584 0 0.000 . 0.00200 6981 13,962 6981 13.962 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 6292 12.584 61Z92 12.584 0 0 .0 0 0 6981 13.962 6981 13.962 1 1. 1 1 1 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 78576 75.433 78Sf6 75.433 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00096 73882 70.927 73882 70.927 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 o.obb 0.00'i08 31588 es.Vos 31588 65.703 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00208 25129 52.268 25129 52.268 S ub To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 110164 141.136 110ii64’' 141.136 0 6 .0 0 0 99011 123.195 99011 123.195 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 2 0 0 2381 28.572 2381 28.572 0 0,000 0.01200 1961 23,532 1961 23.532 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 2381 28.572 2381 28.572 0 0 .0 0 0 1961 23.532 1961 23.532 11 Civil Works 11.01 B R C 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 4.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 .0 2 CRC d 5.084 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 5.084 0 0.000 2.00000 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 6 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 O.OOO 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.04 Primary School {10 children) ' ‘ 0 0.000 2.60000 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ' 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 o.doa 5.17000 33 170.610' 33 170.610 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 5 25.850 5 25.850 Prefabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 district (500 sealer) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.85000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sanctioned 11.09 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 in previous years under S S A 1 1 .1 0 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0.000 2.00000 1 00 2 0 0 .0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 1 00 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 1 00 2 0 0 .0 0 0 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0,000 2.00000 50 lOO.OOO 50 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 50 100.000 50 1 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 .1 2 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 d,boo 0,50000 p 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.14 Water Facility 0 6.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 b 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 6 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 11.17 Electrification 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 11.18 Head Master's Room 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000, 11.19 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 o.doo 36.05000 1 36.050 1 36.050 0 0 .0 0 0 36.05000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 1 1 .2 0 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 94.67500 Q 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11 .2 2 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.obo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 '0 0,000 0 0,000 11.23 Other (Boundary Wail) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 6 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 o;obo o.oodoo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 Sub Total(Civil Works) 0 5.084 ' 184 506.660 184 511.744 0 0 . 0 0 0 155 325.850 155 325.850 ruiiiituiu roi oovi. UPS K anker Kawardha S pill O v e r from 2008>09 Freeh Recomrriendatlon Total Ind. spill over S.N. C om po n en t 2009-10 Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Incl. spill over Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. No. of Children 11.25 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 ,0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Sub Total(Fumlture) 0 o.odo o.oosoo 0 O.OGO 0 0.000 0 0.006 0.00500 0 0.000 6 0.000 Sub Total (CIvll'i-Fumiture) 0 5.084 o.oosOo 184 5061660 1«4 511.744 0 0.000 0.00500 155 325.850 155 325.850 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 o.ooo' 0 .5 6 0 0 0 33 16.500 33 16.500 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 5 2.500 5 2.500 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 0 .0 6 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 O.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.oOO 0 0 .0 0 0 S ub T o U l 0 0.000 33 16.500 33 I 6.SOO 0 0.000 5 2.500 5 2.500 13 1. Maintenance Grant 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 2066 134.550 2 0 6 6 134.550 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 1352 77.350 1352 77.350 S ub Total 0 0.000 206^ 134.550 2066 134.550 0 0.606 1352 77.350 1352 V7.356 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.02000 1605 32.100 1605 32.100 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 1054 21.080 1054 21.080 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.62000 551 1 1 .0 2 0 551 1 1 .0 2 0 0 0 .0 0 6 O.O2OOO 516 10.320 ?16 1O.'320 S u b To tal 0 0.000 2156 43.120 2186 43.120 0 0.000 l!570 31.400 1570 31.400 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 2156 28.028 2 1 6 6 28.028 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01300 1570 20.410 1570 20.410 Supervision S u b To tal 0 0.000 2156 28.028 2156 ^8.028 0 0.000 1570 20.410 1570 20.410 16 Sj!§n38m t i ! l 9l§ 16.01 Management & MIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 1 118.680 1 118.680 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 91.110 1 91.110 16’02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0 .0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 1 65.000 1 65.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 i 61.000 1 6 1 .0 0 0 ' S u b To tal 0 0.600 2 183.680 2 183.886 0 0.000 2 152.110 2 152.110 17 G. Innovative Activity ' 17.01 E C C E ' ,0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooboo 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0.000 0.00000 1 1 5 .0 0 0 T l 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 IS.OOO 17.03 SC/ST Edutaiion 0 o.’oSo' 0 .0 0 ^ )0 0 1 15.000 'T 1 5 :0 0 0 0 0.060 o.oOooo 1 15. boo 1 15.000 17.04 Computer Education 0 'OT 6.d6o6b ■( 50.666 1 sd.bdo’ 0 0.000 0.00000 1 50,000 1 50.000 17.05 Urban deprived Children 0 O.OOO 0.06600 1 5.000 ■ ' 1 5.600 0 0.000 0.00000 1 5.000 1 5.000 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 1 166.000 1 100.60^ 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 8632 5.179 8632 5.179 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 6936 4.162 6936 4.162 S u b To ta l 0 0.600 8632 5.179 8632 5.179 0 0.006 6936 4.162 6936 4.162 To ta l S S A 0 5.084 154891 3309.3Sl2 154891 3314.477 0 0.000 136372 3082.552 136372 3082.552 IS State Connponent 19,1 Management Cost 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 19.2 REMS ...... 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 6 ' 0 0.060 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 6 0 0 0 0 .6 6 6 0 0 .0 0 0 Sub Total 1 6 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 o' 0.000 Total SSA'*-State Component 0 5.084 154891 3309:3^2' 1548^1 3 3 1 4 .W 0 0.000 136372 3082.552 136372 3082.552 20 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 43 27.450 43 27.450 Total NPEGEl 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 43 27.450 43 27.450 21 KGBV Total Non Recurring 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Recuning 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 25.470 1 25.470 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 4 101.880 4 101.880 T o t a l K G B V 0 d.odo 1 2S .470 1 25.470 0 0.000 4 101.880 4 101.880 Grand Total (SSA+NPEGEL+KGBV) G 5.084 154892 3334.^62 154882 3339.9471 0 0.000 136419 3211.882 136419 3211.882 ■...... f^orha ...... ■ - ■ korea Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Incl. spill over S.N. C om po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 N ew Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 T 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 '0 0.000 0,000 0,000 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OOOOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to U P S 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 S ub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0.000 0.000 0,000 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0.000 0.20100 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.20100 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .6 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 o.OQobo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New U P S teachers for U P S sanctioned in 2.05 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-04 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0,000 0.000 2.06 N ew Additional Teacher Pri. SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0,000 0 ,0 0 0 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-II 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,000 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-III 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,000 0.000 0,000 New teachers-SKlll for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0,16800 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,16800 25 4.200 25.000 4,200 children 0.000 0 0.000 S u b To tal 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 25 4.200 25 4.200 Teachers Salary (Recurring ) 1 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 932 782.880 9 3 2 782.880 0 0,000 0.84000 628 527,520 628.000 527,520 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0.000 0.98000 636 623.280 636 623.280 0 0.000 0,98000 704 689.920 704.000 689.920 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-lll 0 0.000 0.84000 21 17.640 21 17.640 0 0,000 0.84000 40 33,600 40.000 33.600 2.15 Additional Teacher PS SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 256 215.040 256 215,040 0 0,060 0.84000 20 16,800 20,000 16.800 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-II 0 0.000 0.98000 289 283.220 289 283,220 0 0.000 0.98000 20 19,600 20,000 19.600 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 20 16.800 20 16,800 0 0 .0 0 0 0,84000 127 106.680 127,000 106.680 2.18 Para Te acher ® 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 o.dot) 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0,000 0.000 S ub Total 0 0.000 2154 1^8.860 2154 1938.860 0 0.000 1539 1394.120 1539 1394.120 3 M. Teacher Grant A OC/JO J.Vl riimary i oacnor vjrani u U.uUU U.UU9UU 10.4DU 009^ ift1 o.^ w v U U.UUUA A A A AU.UUOUU A A C A A00 11 uA .oC Qy uA •1lu A .oA Qy uA 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 2114 10.570 2114 10.570 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00500 1294 6,470 ###### 6,470 S u b Total 0 o.obo 5806 29.030 5806 29.030 0 0.000 3432 17.160 3432 17.160 1 4 B. Blocl( Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 6 4.752 6 4.752 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.79200 25 19.800 25.000 19.800 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0,50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,000 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0,20000 5 1 .0 0 0 5 I.OOO 0 0.000 0.20000 5 1 ,0 0 0 5,000 1,000 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0 .0 0 0 0,09000 5 0.450 5 0.450 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.09000 5 0,450 5.000 0.450 4.05 T L M Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0,05000 5 0.250 5 0.250 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 5 0,250 5.000 0.250 S u b Total 0 0.000 5 6.4S2 T 6.452 0 0.000 5 21.500 5 21.500 S C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.10000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0.16000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 89 2,670 89 2.670 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 70 2 ,1 0 0 70.000 2 .1 0 0 5.04 Meeting T.A. ' 0 o.ood 0.03600 89 3.204 89 3.204 0 6 .0 0 0 0.03600 70 2,520 70.000 2,520 5.05 T L M Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 o.oiooo 89 0.890 89 0.890 0 6,600 0 .0 1 0 0 0 70 0,700 70.000 0,700 S ub Total 0 0.000 89 6.764 89 6.764 0 0.000 70 5.320 70 5.320 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservice (10 days at Block level) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 5806 58.060 5806 58.060 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 3027 30,270 ttUilStilt 30,270 /\ OQ A C 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 O.QQO U.UUOUO vOUOCQAfi 29.03006 AOA 5800confs U U.UUUA A A A U.UUOUUA A A C A A A 0 7 lO . lO O •1lO . *1 lO O 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 6 .0 0 0 0.03000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 25 0,750 25.000 0.750 Korba ...... - ■' Korea Spill Over from 2008-09 Total incl. spill over S.N. C om po n en t Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Incl. spill over Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (SOdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06000 405 24.300 405.000 24.300 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0.600 0.00500 94 0.470 94 0.470 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00500 75 0.375 75.000 0.375 S ub To tal 0 0.000 11706 87.560 11706 87.560 0 0 .0 0 0 6559 70.830 6559 70.830 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE 1 (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,02829 114 3.225 114.000 3.225 (ii) fijRBC (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02^29 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.obo 0,02829 70 1.980 7b'.bbo 1.980 (Hi) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(RQsidential) 0 0.000 0.10000 2 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 ' 2 0 0 2 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 1133 77.044 1133 77.044 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06800 110 7.480 1 1 0 .0 0 0 7.480 (V i) Bridge Course Residential (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 500 34.000 500 34.000 0 o.oob 0.06800 80 5.440 80.000 5.440 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 1833 131.044 1833 131.644 0 0.000 374 18.125 374 18.125 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0.000 0.00200 8921 17.842 8921 17.842 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 2 0 0 4751 9.502 9.502 S ub To ta l 0 0.000 8921 17.842 8921 17.842 0 0.000 4751 9.502 4751 9.502 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text E|ool<(P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 134385 129.010 134305 129.010 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00096 67250 64.560 ###### 64.560 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208 5 5 ^ 7 115.746 55647 115.746 0 o.Ooo 0,00208 28218 ^ 8.693 ###### 5^693 S u b To tal 0 0.000 190032 244.755 190032 244.755 0 0.000 95468 123.253 95468 123.253 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0,000 0.01200 1089 13.068 1089 13.068 0 0.000 0,01200 1524 18.288 ###### 18.288 S u b To tal 0 0.000 1089 13.068 1089 13.068 0 0.000 1524 18.288 1524 18.288 11 Civil Works 11.01 BRC 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.02 C R C 0 0.000 2.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0,000 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.boo 0 .0 0 0 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 b.ooo 4.65000 0 o.bbo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 .0 0 0 b.oob 0 .0 0 0 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 zb b o b b 0 b.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 2,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooo 0 .0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 0 .0 0 0 s.i'^bob 0 b.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5,17000 1 ° b.boo o.obo o.oob i^refabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.ooo; 0,00000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 O.ODO previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School' sanctioned 11.09 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5,17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 in previous years under S SA 0 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0.000 2.00000 150 300.000 150 300.000 0 0.000 2.00000 36 72.000 36.000 72.000 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2.00000 50 1 0 0 .0 0 0 50 1 0 0 .0 0 0 b 0 .0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 '153 306.000 153.000 306.000 11.12 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.obb 0 .0 0 0 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 0.000 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 b.bbo 11.14 W ater Facility 0 o.odo O.OOODO 0 o.oob “ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 o.obb o.obO' o.obo 11.1S Boundary Walt 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 T o.bbo o' 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 b.oob' 0 .0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 . . . . O.bo'd o.obooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 0.0(DO 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 b.boo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00000 0 0.000 o.Obb o.ooo 11.18 Head Master’s Room 0 d.oob b.bobbo 0 o.boo 0 O.OOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.18 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 0.000 36.0sb00 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 36,05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooo' 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 O.OOO 1 ' 0 o.obo 0 0 .0 0 0 76.420b b 0 b.ooo 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 18,46000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.22 BALA Condept (in Govt. UPS) 0 o.bbo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.oob 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 0.000 d.oobbo 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 b 0 .0 0 0 0,00000 b 0.000 0.000 0 .0 0 0 Sub TotaKCivH Works 0 0.000 200 400.000 200 400.000 0 0.000 189 378.000 ^8'9 378.000 Furniture fpr Govt. UPS (Rs. lakhs) K orba Korea Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2008-10 Total )ncl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.26 No. of Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 14107 70.535 ifftftflifff 70.535 Sub Total(Fumitur«) 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 14107 70.535 14107 70.535 Suti Total (CIvil'f Furniture) 0 0.000 0.00500 200 400.000 200 400.000 0 0.000 0.00500 14286 448.535 14296 448.535 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TI.E - New Primary 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 '0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 o.ooo O.OOOOO 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 13 1. IMalntenance Grant 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 1785 96.600 1785 96.600 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 1342 84.500 IIIIIIIIII If 84.500 S u b Total 0 0.000 1785 96.600 1785 96.600 0 0.000 1342 84.500 1342 84.500 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 o.doo 0 .0 2 0 0 0 1672 31.440 1572 31.440 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 1018 20.360 20.360 14.02 Upper Pi^imary School Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 , 497 9.940 497 9.940 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 414 8.280 414.000 8.280 S u b To tal 0 0.000 2069 41.380 2069 41.380 0 0,000 1432 28.640 1432 28.640 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 2069 26.897 0 0 .0 0 0 ###### Supervision 0.01300 2069 26.897 0.01300 1432 18.616 18.616 S u b Total 0 0.000 2069 26.897 2069 26.897 0 0.000 1432 18.616 1432 18.616 • 16 Management & MIS 16.01^Management & MIS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 100.960 0 100.960 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 87.220 1 ,0 0 0 87.220 16.0Z Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0.000 0.00000 0 65.000 * 0 65.000 0 0 .0 0 0 56.20000 1 50.000 1 .0 0 0 50.000 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 165.960 0 165.960 0 0.000 2 137.220 2 137.220 171G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OOOOO 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 .0 0 0 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 .0 0 0 15.000 17.03 SC/St Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 .0 0 0 15.000 17.04 Computer Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 50.000 1 50.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 50.000 1 ,0 0 0 50.000 17.05 Urtjan deprmd Chlldrsfi 0 o.bod o.od'odo 1 5.^00 i 5.G06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 5.000 1 .0 0 0 5.000 Sub Total Innovation I 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization c 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 7006 4.204 7006 4.204 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 5492 3.295 HMM tt 3.295 S ub To tal 0 0.000 7006 4.204 7006 4.204 0 0.000 5492 3.295 5492 3.295 To tal S S A 0 0.000 234765 3310.416 2 3 4 7 ^ 3310.416 0 0.000 137744 2503.105 137744 2503.105 19 State Component 19.1 Management Cost 0 0.000 0.00000 b 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 19.2 R EM S 0 o.boo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.obb 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 Total SSA+State Component 0 0.000 234765 3310.416 234705 3310.416 0 0.000 137744 2503.105 137744 2503.105 20 N P E G E L 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 89 66.043 '8 9 66.043 0 0.000 0.00000 42 29.901 42.000 29.901 Total NPEGEL 0 0 .000 89 66.043 ' 99 66.043 0 0.000 42 29.901 42 29.901 21 KGBV Total Non Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o'.obo 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Total Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 5 127.350 5 127.350 0 0 .0 0 0 25.47000 4 101.880 4.000 101.880 T o t a l K G B V 0 0.000 5 127.350 5 127,350 0 0.000 4 101.880 4 101.880 Grand Total (SSA-t^NPEGEL-^KGBV) 0 0.000 234859 3503.809 234859 3503.809 0 0.000 137790 2634.886 137790 2634.886 Mahasamund Narayanpur Spill O v e r fri>m S.N. C o m po n en t 2008-09 Fresh Recommencfation 2009-10 Total incl. spill oyer dpili O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 To ta l incl. SDill ove r P hy. Fin. U nit p ost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. N ew S cho ol 1.01 New Primary School (for to children) 10 25 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 hJew Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OOOOO 1 0 .0 0 0 1 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to U PS 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 5 0 .0 0 0 5 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 '5 0 .0 0 0 5 0 .0 0 0 S ub To ta l 0 6 6 0 5 5 2 N. Te a c h e rs Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 2 0.336 2 0.336 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 o.c^oo O.20TOO 15 3.015 15 3.015 0 0.606 0 .2 0 1 0 0 15 3.015 15 3.015 2.03 New U P S Teachers Salary Sl<-lll 0 o.o'Oo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 6 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.066 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 fJe w ljP § teacFTers for^UPS sanctioned in 2.05 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 2002-C|4 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.06 New Additional Teacher Pri. Sk-lTT 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-II 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - U^S SK-lil 0 0.000 0.06006 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New teachers-SKlil for Gyan jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 children S u b To tal 0 0.000 17 3.351 17 3.351 0 0.000 15 3.015 15 3.015 Teachers Salary (Recurring) 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 256 215.040 266 215.040 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 302 253.680 302 253.680 2.11 UPS Teacf|ers Salary SK-II 0 0.000 0.98060 631 618.386' 631 618)380 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 189 185.220 189 185.220 2.12 U p 'S teachers Salary SK-III 0 o.bo6 o.846boi 77 64.680 f r 64.680 0 0 .0 0 0 0,84000 10 8.466 10 8.400 2.15 Additional teacher PS Si^-ill 0 b.666 0.8^000 458 384.^20 458 384.720 0 o.Ooo 0.84000 13 10.920 13 10.920 2.16 Additional TeacRer UPS SK-II 0 0.666 0.98000 2 0 0 196.000' 260 196.(366 6 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 11 10.780 11 10.780 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 45 3*7.866 45 37.h00 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 16 13.440 16 13.440 2.18 Para Teacher® 0 o.OoO 0.0W500 0 6.000 0 6.006 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 6 6.606 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.060 0 0.600 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S ub To tal 0 0.000 1667 1516.620 1667 1516.620 0 0.000 541 482.440 541 482.440 3 M. Te a c h e r G rant 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 2746 13.730 2^46 13.730 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 421 2.105 421 2.105 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 1871 9.355 18?T , 9.355 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00566 239 1.195 239 1.165 S u b Total 0 0.000 4617 23.085 4617 2i085 0 0.000 660 3.300 660 3.300 4 B. Block Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0.000 0.79200 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.79200 16 12.672 16 12.672 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0.20000 5 1.000 5 1 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 O.2O0OO 2 0.400 'i 0.400 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 . 5 0.450 5 0.450 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 2 0.180 2 0.180 4.oe T L M Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 o .o 5o 6o 5 0.25b 5 0.250 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 2 0 .1 0 0 2 0 .1 0 0 S u b To ta 0 0.000 5 1.700 5 1.700 0 0.000 2 13.352 2 13.352 C. Cluster Resource Centre 0 .0 0 0 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 5.o : 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 118 3.540 118 3.540 0 0.606 0.03000 2 2 0.660 22 0.660 5.04 Meeting T.A. 0 o.ood 0.03666 118 4.'248 ' 118 4'.248 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 2 2 0.7Q2 22 0,>92 0 .2 2 0 0 ,2 2 0 5.0! T L M Grant 0 6.0001 0.61*060 118 1.1601 118 1.180 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 ' 2 2 22 S u b T o ta 1 0 O.OOG1 118 8.968 118 8.968 0 0.000 22 1.672 22 1.672 P. Teachers Training 6.011 Inservice (10 days at Block level) 0' 0 .0 0 0 1 0 .0 1 0 0 0 4617 46.1701 4017 46.170 0 0.000 0.01000 660 6.600 660 6,600 6.02! Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 0 .0 0 0 1 0.00560 4617 23.085 ' 4617 ^3.’0'85 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 660 3.3O0 660 3,300 6.o:I New Recruit Trained (30days) 0i 0.0001 0.03000 17 0.510 17 0.510 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 15 0.450 15 0,450 (Rs. lakhs) Ma^asamund Narayanpur S pill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-0S Fresh Recommendation Total incl. spill over S.N. Com po n en t 2009-10 2009-10 Phy. Fin . Unit cost Phy. Rn. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (SOdays^ 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 123 0.615 123 0.615 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 24 0 .1 2 0 24 0 .1 2 0 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 9374 70.380 9374 70.380 0 0 .0 0 0 1359 10.470 1359 10.470 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (1) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 226 6.394 226 6.394 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 96 2.716 96 2.716 (ii> N R B C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 172 4.866 172 4.866 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 63 1.782 63 1.782 (ill) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.05000 150 7.500 150 7.500 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (IV) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.10000 50 5.000 50 5,000 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 370 ’ 25.160 370 25.160 0 0 .0 0 0 0,06800 1542 104.856 1542 104.856 (VI) Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 246 16.728 246 16.728 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 828 56.304 828 56.304 S u b To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 1164 60.647 1 1 ^ 60.647 0 0 .0 0 0 2579 170.658 2579 170.658 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0.000 0.00200 9087 18.174 9087 18.174 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 1253 2.506 1253 2.506 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 9087 18.174 9087 18.174 0 0 .0 0 0 1253 2.506 1253 2.506 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 97784 93.873 97784 93.873 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00096 18615 17.870 18615 17.870 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0!0020i3 45535 94.713 46535 94,713 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208 5537 11.517 5537 11,517 S u b To tal 0 0 .0 0 0 143319 188.585 143319 198.585 0 0 .0 0 0 24152 29.387 24152 29.387 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0 .0 0 0 - 0 ,0 1 2 0 0 3409 40.908 3409 40.908 0 0.000 0,01200 153 1.836 153 1,836 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 3409 40.908 3409 40.908 0 0 .0 0 0 153 1.836 153 1.836 11 Civil Works 11.01 BRC 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.02 C R C 0 9.218 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 9.218 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 4 .6S 000 1 4.650 1 4.650 0 o.ooo 4.65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 2.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.08 Upper Primary School 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 ! 5 25.850 5 25.850 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 5 25.850 5 25.850 Prefabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4,65000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4,65000 0 0.000 0 0.000 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for Upper Primary School sanctioned 11.09 0 0 .0 0 0 5,17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5,17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 in previous years under S S A 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 1 00 2 0 0 .0 0 0 100 200.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 ,0 0 0 0 0 32 64.000 32 64,000 11.11Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 1 00 2 0 0 .0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 13 26.000 13 26,000 11.12Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 '■ b 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 0 0.000 0.5Q000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.14 Water Facility 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0.000 o.ooood 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.18 Head Master’s Room 1 0 0.000 0.00000 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.19 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 o.doo 36.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 36.05000 7 252.350 7 252.350 0 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 o,ooo6o 6 0 ,0 0 0 0 d.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 d.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 11.22 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0.000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 0,000 0.00000 '0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Sub TotaKCivil Works) 0 9.218 20i5 430.500 206 439.718 0 0 .0 0 0 57 368.200 57 368.200 Furniture for Govt. UPS Mahasamund Narayanpur S pill d v e r fr S.N. C om po n en t 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 I Total incl. spill over S pill O v e r from 2008-091 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 1 Total incl. sdIII o v e r t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 Sub Total(Fumiture) 0 0.000 6.66506 0 6.066 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 Sub Total (Civil-i-Furnlturej 0 9.218 6.06560 1 206 430.566 206 439.718 0 0.000 0.00500 57 368.200 57 368.200 12 0 . Teaching Learning lEquipment 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0.000 0.20000 1 0.200 1 0.200 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0 0.000 12.02 TL6 - New Upper Primary 0 o.bdo 0.5OO6O 5 2.506 5 2.500 0 0.000 0.50000 5 2,500 5 2.500 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 0.000 0.00600 0 0.000 0 o.bbo 0 0.606’ 0,00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 • S u b Total 0 d.odo 6 2.706 6 2.700 0 6.000 5 2.500 5 2.500 13 1. Maintenance Grant 13.01' MaihtenanoeGrant ' 0 0.000 0.07500 1780 124.950 1780 124.950 0 0.000 0.07500 359 22.500 359’ 22.500 S u b To tal 0 0.000 1780 124.956 1780 124.950 0 0.000 359 22.506 359 22.566 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 b.ooo 0.02000 1343 26.860 1343 26.860 0 0.000 0.02000 417 8,340 417 8.340 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 orooo 0.02066 475 9.500' 475 9.500 0 0.000 0,02000 105 2.100 105 2.100 S u b Total 0 0.066 ' 18liB 36,360 18^8 36.360 0 0.000 522 10.440 522 16.440 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, HAonitorin^ & 15.01 0 0.000 0.01300 1818 23.634 1818 23.634 0 0.000 0.01300 522 6.786 522 6.786 Supervision S ub Total ' 0 0.000 1818 23.634 1818 23.634 0 0.000 522 6.786 522 6.786 1§ MinagsmsntftMII 16;01 Mana^ment'S. MIS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 102.700 0 102.700 0 0.000 0,00000 0 36.953 0 36.953 Learning Enhancement Programme 0.000 0 0 55.000 0 0.000 ■o'obobo 6 25.000 0 2§.000 16.02 1 ° 0.00060 55.000 S u b Total! 0! 0.000 0 157.766 0 157.700 6 0.000 0 61.953 0 61.953 IT G. Innovative Activity 1 17.01 ECCE 0 0.000 0.00000 ^ 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0.000 0:06666 1 15.000 iS.obo 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15,000 1 15.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 6.000 0.00000 1 15.066 15.0001 0 o.bool 0.06060 1 fs.obo 1 15.000 17.04 Computer Education , 0 o'oob' o.oeboo 1 50.000 1 50.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 50.000 1 50.000 17.05 Urban deprived Children 0 6.66b 0.00000 1 5.000 1 5.000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 5,000 1 5.60b Sub Total Innovation 0 b.6o6 1 100.666 1 100.000 6 0.066 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 1.008 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization ' 0 0.000 0.00060 8216 4'.930 8216 4.930 0 0.000 0.00060 1680 1,008 1680 S ub Total 0 0.600 8216 4:936 8216 4.930 6 0.000 1680 1.008 1686 1.008 To tal SSA 0 9.218 186622 2813.192 2822.410 6 0.000 33882 1292.023 33882 1292.023 1S State Component 0.000 19.1 Management Cost 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 19.2 REMS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.066 S u b To tal 0 6.000 0 o.ood 0 oJobo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 Total SSA'*'State Component 0 9.218 ■ ■ ■ ■ I I I 0.666 33882 1292.023 3388:^ 1292.623 16.681 22 ' 16.681 2C1 N P E G E L 01 6.*000 0.00000 0.000 ■ 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 22 Total NPEGEI G1 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 22 16.681 22 16.681 21I K G D V 0.000 0 6.000 Total Non Recuninj( 01 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 25.47000 2 50.940 2 50.940 Total Rectininf! 01 0.000 25.47000 3 76.410 3 76.410 0 0.000 T o t a l K G B V c1 0.000 3 7^.410 3 76.410 0 0.000 2 50.940 2 50.940 33906 1359.645 Grand Total (SSAt^NPEGEL-i-KGBV) ( ) 9.216 0.000 33906 1359.645 l^aigarh R aipur Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy, Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to U P S 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.20100 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 New U P S teachers for U P S sanctioned in 2.05 2002-04 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 6 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.06 New Additional Teacher Pri. SK-Ilt 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-II 0 b.ooo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 New teachers-SKIII for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 children 0.16800 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 I" Teachers Salary (Recuning) 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 906 761.040 906 761.040 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 1230 1033.200 1230 1033.200 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 o.doo' 0.98000 1332 1305.366 1332 1305.360 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 2335 2307.900 2355 2307.900 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-III 0 o.ooo' 0.84000 108 90.720 i d s 90.720 0 o;ooo 0.84000 243 204.120 243 204.120 2.16 Additional Teacher PS SK-III 0 6 .0 0 0 0.84000 1 02 85.680 1 0 ? 85.680 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 3500 2940.000 3500 2940,000 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 1 0 0 98.000 100 98.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98000 923 904.540 923 904.540 2.17 Additional Teacher U P S SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 100 84.000 100 84.000 0 o.obo 0.84000 1 6 0 84.000 1 0 0 84,000 2.18 Para Teacher® 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 6 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 .0 6 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 S u b To tal 0 o.obb 2648 2424.806 2648 2424.800 0 0 .0 0 0 8351 7473.760 8351 7473.760 3 M. Te a c h e r Grant 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 4345 21.725 4345 21.725 0 0.000 0.00500 11086 55.430 11086 55.430 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 3320 16.600 3320 16.600 0 0.000 0.00500 6599 32.995 6599 32.995 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 7665 38.325 7605 38.32S 0 0 .0 0 0 17685 88.425 17685 88.425 4 B. Blocl( Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0.000 0.79200 66 52.272 6 6 52.272 0 0.000 0.79200 23 18.216 23 18.216 4.02 Furniture CSrant 0 0.000 0.50000 0 6 .0 0 6 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,50000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0.20000 9 1.800 9 '1.86o 0 ' 0 .0 6 0 0.20000 15 3.000 15 3.000 4.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0.000 0.09000 9 0.810 9 'O.8IO 0 0.000 0.09000 15 1.350 15 1.350 4.0S T l M Grant 0 o.'odo 6.0^000 9 0.450 9 0.450 0 0.000 0.05000 15 0.750 15 0.750 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 9 55.332 9 55.332 0 0 .0 0 0 15 23.316 15 23.316 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 .6 0 0 0.10000 0 0.000 0 0.000 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0 .6 3 6 6 0 105 3.150 105 3.150 0 0.000 0.03000 262 7.860 262 7.860 5.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0.000 0.03600 105 3.780 105 3.780 0 0.000 0.03600 262 9.432 262 9.432 5.od T L M iSrant 0 0.000 0.01000 , 105 1.050 1 0 6 1.050 0 0.000 0.01000 262 2.620 262 2.620 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 105 7.980 IOS 7.980 0 0 .0 0 0 262 19.912 262 19.912 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservlce (10 days at Block level) 0 0.000 0.01000 7665 76.650 7665 76.650 0 0.000 0.01000 16976 169.760 16976 169.760 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 0.000 0.00500 7665 38.325 766^ 38.325 0 0.000 0.00500 16976 84.880 16976 84.880 . 6.03 New Recruit Trained (30days) 0 0.000 0.03000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.03000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Riigam RaVour Spill O v e r from 2008-09 §:N . Component Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total Ind. spill over Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total inci. soili over Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained ^60davs) 0 0.000 0.06000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.06000 709 42.540 709 42.540 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (Sdays) 0 o.ooo 0"0Ci50'0 114 0.S70 114 0.570 0 0.000 0.00500 277 1.385 277 1.385 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 15444 115.545 1 5 4 ^ 115.545 0 0.000 34938 298.565 34938 298.565 7 nterventlons for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (') N R B C (P ) 0 0.000 0.02829 405 11.457 405 11.457 0 0.000 0.02829 700 19.803 700 19.803 (ii) N h B C (U P ) 0 0.000 0.02829 82 2.320 ...... 82 2.320 0 o.ooo 0.02829 0 0.000 ...... ' 6 0.000 (ii>) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0.000 0.05000 200 10.000 200 10.000 0 0.000 0.05000 100 5.000 100 5.000 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0.000 0 ‘ 0.000 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0.000 0 0.000 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0.000 0.06800 215 14.620 215 14.620 0 0.000 0.06800 0 0.000 0 0.000 (VI) Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0.000 0.06800 147 9.996 147 9.996 0 0.000 0.06800 800 54.400 800 54.400 S u b Total 0 0.000 1649 48.393 1049 48.393 0 0.00b 1600 79.203 I606 79.203 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0.000 0.00200 9966 19.932 9966 19.932 0 0.000 0.00200 30308 60,616 30308 60.616 S ub To tal 0 0.000 9966 19.932 19.932 0 o.0(ib 30308 60.616 35308 60.616 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0.000 0.00096 1134824 129.431 134824 129.431 0 0.000 0.00096 360100 345,696 360100 345.696 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 o.doo 0.00208 5^857 124.503 5 9 8 ^ 124.503 0 0.000 0.00208 138205 287.466 138205 287.466 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 1§ 4 ||1 2§3.§34 6 8.060 4§830S 833.162 4§830S 633.162 10H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0.000 0.01200 3536 42.432 3536 42.432 0 0.000 0.01200 4725 56.700 4725 56.700 , S ub Total 0 0.000 3536 42.432 3536 42.432 0 0.000 4725 56.700 4725 56.700 11 Civil Work* 11.01 BR C 0 0.000 4.00000 0 O.OOO 0 0.000 0 0.000 4.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.02 CRC 0 O.OOO 2.00000 b d.bob 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.00000 0 0.000 0 o.ooo 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 d.66d 4.65000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 b.bbo 4.65000 d 0.000 b o.bob 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 o.ooo' 2.00000 0 o.obo 0.000 0 0.000 2.obbbb 6 ' o.bbo 0 o.bbo 11.05 0 0.000 5.ti7b(30 0 O.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 5.17000 9 0.000 0 0.000 Prefabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 ' 0 0.000 4.65000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4.65000 0 0.000 0 0,000 previous years under SSA (4Q children) Building for Upper Primary School sanctioned 11.OS 0 o.ooo 5.17000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 20.000 5.17000 0 0.000 0 20,000 in previous years under S SA 11.1C Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0.000 2.00000 300 600.000 300 600.000 0 0.000 2.00000 400 800.000 400 800,000 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2.00000 4bo sbo^.obo 400 800.000 0 0.000 2.00000 200 400.000 200 400,000 i i . i : Toilet/Urinals(PS) 0 O.OOO o.sodob 0 'o.Oob 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 i i . i : J Separate Girls Toilet 0 0.000 o .50o"o 6 ‘ 0 o'bdo ' 0 o.ooo 0 o.bbo 0.50000 0 0.000 0 0,000 11.1^I Water Facility d 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 1 1 .K 5 Boundary Wall 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.bob 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 1.K S Separation Wall 0 0.000 b.o6o(5o 0 b.bbb 0 0.000 0 0.000 o'.ooooo 0 0.000 0 0,000 o.ooo 11.1'r Electrification 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.bbo 0 1 1.K3 Head Master's Room 0 0.000 o.boboo 0 o.ooip 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 11.H} Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 o;ooo 36.05000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 36,05000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.2(1 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0.000 o.ooooo 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 11.2'1 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11.2;2 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0.000i 0,00000 c1 0.0001 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00000 0 o.bob 0 0.000 0.000 11.2;J Other (Boundary Wall) 0' 0.0001 o.ooooo 01 0.0001 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.obb 0 0.000 0.000 11.2-i Furniture for Govt. UPS students 01 O.DOO1 o.ooooo 01 0.0001 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 1220.000 Sub TotaKCIvll Works ) 0 0.0001 7001 1400.0001 roo 1400.000> 0 20.000 600 1200.000 600 Furniture for Govt. UPS ------^— (Rs. lakhs) Raigarh i 1 R aipur 1 Spill O v e r fro m 2008-09 Fresh Reconimehdation 2009-10 1 Tortai incf. spin over ISpill Over from 2008-09>1 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 1 Total inci. spill over 1 S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin, P W . Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. ■ 11.25 No. of Children 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 Sub Total(Fumiture; 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0,000 Sub Total (OvII-i’Fumiture! 0 0.000 0.00500 700 1400.000 700 1400.000 0 20.000 0.00500 600 1200.000 600 1220.000 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primalv 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0 0.000 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary b 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 13 1. M aintenance G ra n t 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 2620 145.350 2620 145.350 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 4268 296.950 4268 296.950 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 2620 145.3§0 2620 145.350 0 0.000 4268 296.950 4268 296.950 U L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 2097 41.940 2097 41.940 0 0.000 0.02000 3103 62.060 3103 62.060 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 0.000 0.02000 926 18.520 '9 2 6 18.520 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 0 1572 31.440 1572 31.440 ....1 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 3023 60.460 3023 60.460 0 0.000 4675 93.500 4675 93.500 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 3023 39.299 0] 0 .0 0 0 Supervision 0.01300 3023 39.299 0.01300 4675 60.775 4675 60.775 __1 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 3023 39.299 3023 39.299 0 0.000 4575 60.775 4675 60.775 16 IMartagement & MIS 16.011 Management & MIS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 133.160 0 133.160 0 0.000 0.00000 ______1 189.090 1 189.090 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0.000 0.00000 0 99.0001 0 99.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 215.000 1 215.000 S u b To tal 0 0.000 0 232.160 0 232.160 0 0.000 2 404.090 2 404.090 ' 1 1 r: 17 G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.006 0 0 .0 0 0 15.00006 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 15.000 1 15.000 0 0 .0 0 0 15.00000 1 15.-990 1 15.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 O.QOO .... 9:99980 1 ' m oo 1 is.eee 6 0 .0 0 0 15.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 ^ 7.84 6offipu'{af ielucation 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 1 50.000 1 50.000 0 0 .0 0 0 50.00000 1 50.000 1 50.000 17.06 Urban deprived Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 1 5.000 5.000 ^ 0 0 .0 0 0 5.00000 1 5.000 1 5.000 Sub Total innovation 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 11734 7.040 11734 7.040 0 0 .0 0 0 'O.OOO6O 18002 10.801 18002 10.801 S u b To tal I 0 0.000 11734 1 7.040 ; 11734 7.040 0 0.000 18002 10.801 18002 10.801 To ta l S S A 0 0 .0 6 6 0 20.000 628412 10899.776 628412 10919.776 19 istate C o m p o n e n t 19.1 Management Cost d 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 19.2 REMS 0 0.600 o.ododo 0 0 ^00 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 O.O0O6O 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 o.obo 0 0.000 0 b.ooo 0 0.000 0 0,000 Total SSA-*-State Component 0 0.000 4996^82 4990.982 I 0 20.000 628412 10899.776 628412 10919.776 20 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ooooo 30 22.107 30 22.107 0 0 .0 0 0 0.60000 114 83.328 114 83.328 Total NPEGEL 0 0.000 30 2Z 107 30 22.107 0 0,000 114 83.328 114 83.328 21KGBV Total Non Recurring 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 6.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Total Recurring 0 0.000 1 2^47000 2 50.940 2 50.940 0 0.000 0.00000 7 175.470 7 175.470 T o t a l K G B V 0i o.obd 2 50.940 2 50.940 0 0.000 7 175.470 7 175.470 Grand Total (SSA*NPEGEL+KGBV> 0 1 0.000 6 20.000 628533 11158.574 628533 11178.574 Surqiiia Spill Over from 2098-09 §:N= Gomponent Fresh RscommahdMon 2008<10 Total Ind.spillover Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. soill over Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy- Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. New School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 1.03 Upgradation of PS to UPS 0 olooo 0.00000 0 6.006 0 O.OOO 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 ■' S u b Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0.000 0.16800 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.16800 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.02 New UPS teachers isalary SK-ll 0 o.odo O.20i0O ...... 6 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.20100 0 O.OOO 6 0.000 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 0.000 o.ooooo 0 O.OO6 0 o.obo 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 o.oo'o o.ooooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0,000 New UP§ teachers fof'UPS sanctioned in 2.05 0 0.000 0 0.000 2002-04 Q 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 2.06 New Addrtio’nal te 'a ch w Pri, SK-lll 0 0.000 o.o'odbd 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0,000 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-ll 0 0.000 0.00066 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 o.obboO 0 0.000 0 o.ooo 2.08 New Addl. teacher - UPS SK-lll 0 6.000 0.00060 0 0.000 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 O.'OOOOO 0 0.000 6 0.000 New teachers-SKlll for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 0.16800 0 0.000 0 355 children 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.16800 59.640 355 59.640 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 355 59.640 355 § § :§ ^ TSIEtlerS § a la iy {RScurrlnf) 2.10 Primary Tsa ^«rs iSat«y Sk-tll 0 0.000 0.64000 552 463.680 552 463.680 0 0.000 0.84000 3054 2565.360 3054 2565.360 2.11 UPS Teachers Salary gk-ll 0 o.ooo 0.98066 , 793 77^. 1^6 7^ 777.140 0 0.000 0.98000 3329 3262.420 3329 3262.420 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-lil 0 o.ooo o .84o66 131 1’10.040 131 110.040 0 0.000 0,84000 100 84^,000 100 ^ 4.600 2.15 Additional Teacher PS SK-lil 0 o.o’bo 0.840o6 1 ^ 6 131’.040 156 131.040 0 0.000 0.84000 377 316.680 377 316,680 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-ll 0 o.65o 0.98000 25 24.506 25 24.500 b 0.000 0.986oO' 70 68.660 '70 '68.600 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-III * 0 ' o.obb 0.84000 50 42.606 50 , 42.00b 0 0.000 0.84000 65 54.600 65 54.600 2.18 Para Teacher® 0 o.ooo o.ooooo’ 0 0.000 0 O.OOO 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 d.ooo 0.00000 0 0.006 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0,060 O' 0.000 S u b Total 0 O.OOQ 1707 1548.400 1707 1548.4db 0 o.doo 6995 6351.660 6995' 6351.860 3 M. Teacher Grant 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.000 0.00500 5040 25.200‘ 5040 25.200 0 0.000 0.00500 8419 42.095 8419 42.095 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 o.ooo 0.00500 2 6 8 0 h.46(5 2 6 8 0 13.400 0 0.000 0.00500 5510 27,550 5510 2>.550 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 7720 38.606 7720 38.600 0 0.000 13929 69.645 13929 69.645 4 B. Block (Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0.000 0.79200 1 42 33.264 42 33.264 0 0.000 0.79200 122 96,624 122 96.624 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.50000 0 O.OOO 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.50000 0 0,000 0 o.doo 4.03 (iontingehcy Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 9 1.800 9 1.800 0 0.000 0.20000 19 3.800 19 3.800 4.04 Meeting T.A, 0 0 .0 0 0 0.09000 9 0.810 9 0.810 0 0.000 0.09000 19 1,7f0 19' 1,710 4.05 T L M Grant 0 o.ooo 0.05060 9 O.450 9 0.450 0 0.000 0.05000 19 O.950 19 0.950 S u b Total 0 0.000 9 3 ^ 3 2 4 9 36.324 0 0.000 19 103.084 19 103.084 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP ■ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.ooc 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.02 Furniture Grant 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0.066 0 6.666 0 0,000 0.10000 0 o.o'bb O' 0,066 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03060 129 3.870 129 3.876 0 0.000 0,03000 239 7,170 23S 7.170 5.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0.000 0.03600 129 4.644 129 4.64^ 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03600 239 8.604 239’ 8.604 5.0S T L M Grant ...... 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 129 1.290 i2 9 1.290 0 0 .0 0 0 0.01000 239 2,390 239 2,390 S u b Total 0 0.000 129 9.804 129 9.804 0 0.000 239 18.164 239 18.164 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservico (10 days at Block level) 0 0.000 0.01000 6599 65.990 6599 65.990 0 0,000 0,01000 13929 139,290 13929 139,290 6.02 Inservica (10 days at Cluster) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 6599 32.995 6599 32.995 0 o,obo 0.00500 13929 69.645 13929 69',645 6.02 New Recruit Trained (30days) ^ .... 0 0.606 0.03000 6 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0,03000 355 10.650 356 10.650 (Rs. lakhs) l^ajnandgaoh Surguja Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recomnwndation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m p o n e n t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (SOdays) 0 0 .0 0 0 (i.06000 1121 67.260 1 ^ 2 1 67.260 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06000 0 0,000 0 0.000 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) (5days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 138 0,690 138 0.690 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 258 1,290 258 1.290 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 14457 166.935 14457 166.935 0 0 .0 0 0 28471 220.875 28471 220.875 ! 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 257 7,271 257 7,271 0 0 .0 0 0 0,02829 898 25.404 898 25,404 (ii) N R 8 C (U P ) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02829 205 5,799 205 5,799 0 0 ,0 0 0 0,02829 180 5,092 180 5.092 (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0,05000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.05000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.10000 0 0.000 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 ,0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 ,0 0 0 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 47 3,196 47 3,196 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.06800 2558 173,944 2558 173,944 (vl Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.06800 1106 75,208 1106 75,208 Sub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 509 16.266 509 16.266 0 0 .0 0 0 4942 299.649 4942 299.649 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0.000 0.00200 1 2 1 0 2 2A.204 1 2 1 0 ? 24.204 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 20018 40,036 20018 40,036 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 1 2 1 0 2 24.204 1 2 1 0 ^ 24.204 0 0 .0 0 0 20018 40.036 20018 40.036 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 6 .0 0 0 0.00096 125670 120,643 125670 120.643 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00096 286367 274,912 286367 274,912 9.02 Free text Book (UP) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208 52177 108,528 52177 108.528 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00208i 95717 199.091 95717 199,091 Sub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 17784^ 229. i r i 177847 229,171 0 0 .0 0 0 382084 474.004 382084 474.004 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0.000 0.01200 2728 32.736 2728 32.736 0 0.000 0.01200 4620 55,440 4620 55.440 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 2728 32,736 2728 32.736 0 0 .0 0 0 4620 55.440 4620 55.440 11 Civil Works 11.01 B R C 0 0 .0 0 0 4.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,6 0 0 4.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.02 C R C ' 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 6 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 L , - - . 9 9:999 199999 0 0.000 e 6 .6 6 6 11.-83 Prii7? i f y § ^ 88l ( 40 « f R ) ' 6 6 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 ____ i 0,000 0 0.000 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 o.boo 2 .0 0 6 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 6 ,6 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Prefabricated School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 district (500 seater) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 ' previous years under SSA (10 children) Building for Primary School sanctioned in 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 4.65000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 previous years under SSA (40 children) Building for tipper Primary School sanctioned 11.09 0 0 .0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 5.17000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 in previous years under S S A 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0.000 2 .0 0 0 0 0 175 350.000 175 350.000 0 0 ,0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 400 800.000 400 800.000 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 0.000 2.00000 150 300.000 150 300,000 6 6,000 2.OOOOO 200 400.000 2 0 0 400.000 11.12 ToileUUrinals(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o.ooo 6 0 ,0 0 0 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.13 Separate Girls Toilet 6 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.50000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.14 Water Facility 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 o.bbo 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.18 Head Master's Room 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 p 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 72.100 11.19 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 0 .0 0 0 36.05000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 36.05000 2 72.100 2 0 .0 0 0 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 11.22 BALA Concept (in Govt. UPS) 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 0.000 0,60666 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students 0 (J.ood 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,6 6 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Sub Total(Civil Works) 0 0.000 325 650.000 325 650.000 0 0 .0 0 0 602 1272.100 602 1272.100 Furniture for Govt. UPS 1 ...... Rajnandaaon | Surguja I s p illo v e r fro m - I § .N . C o m pp n en t 2008 09 Fresh Recommendation 2009>10 | Total incl. spill over 1Spill O v e r from 2008-091 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 [ Total Incl. spill over Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Unit cost j Nhy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0.000 0,00500 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0,000 0 0.000 Sub Total(Fumitur6) 0 0.000 0.00500 0 o.dod 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 6 o.doo Sub Total (CivlKFumiture) 0 o.bbo o.dosoo 325 65o:odb 325 650.0db 0 0.000 0.00500 602 1272.100 602 1272.100 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primaiy 0 0.000 0.20000 0 0.000 0 o.dOd 0 d .o o o 0.20000 0 o .o o o 0 0.000 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0,000 o .s o b d d 0 o .d o d ’ 0 o .d d O 0 0,000 0.50000 0 o .d b b ' 0 0.000 12.03 Other (TLE) ’ 0 0.000 o.ooood 0 0.000 0 d.ddb 0 0.000 o.ooood 0 o.dOd 0 0.000 • Sub Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 13 L Maintenance Grant 13.01 \4aintenance Grant 0 0.000 0.07500 2630 163.050 2630 163.050 0 0.000 0.07500 5601 393.050 5601 393,05d S u b To tal 0 o'.ooo 2630 163.050 2630 163.05b 0 0.000 5601 393.050 6601 393.05d 14 L. School Grant 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 0,000 0.02000 1890 37.800 1890 37.800 0 0.000 0.02000 4335 86.700 4335 86.7d 0 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant d o.dod 0.02000 760 15,200 760 15,200 0 0.000 0.02000 1737 34.740 17^7 34.740 S u b To tal 0 0.000 2650 53.000 2660 53.000 0 0.000 6072 121.440 6b72 121.440 15 k. Research and Evaluation Research', Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 Supervision 0 0.000 0.01300 2650 34.450 12660 34,450 0 0.000 0.01300 6072 78.936 6072 78.936 S u b To tal 0 0.000 2650 34.450 2650 34.450 0 0.000 6072 78.936 6072 78.936 16 Management & MIS 16.01 Management & MIS 0 0.000 0.00000 0 134,600 0 134,600 0 0.000 0.00000 1 219.300 1 m m 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme e 0-,QQQ 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 §§,609 0 §§,083 0.000 0.00000 1 i 99,d o d 1 199.000 S u b To tal 0 6.000 0 1^9.^d0 0 199.60b 0 0.000 2 418.300 2 418.300 17 G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0,000 0.00000 1 ^ 15,000 1 15,000 0 0.000 0.00000 1 15.000 1 15.000 17.02 Girls Education 0 0.000 0,00000 1 i5.o6d V 15,000 0 o.doo 0.00000 1 15,d 00 1 is.ddd 17.03 Sd'/ST Education 0 o.bod' d.ddodo' 1 iS.ddd i 5,o b d ' 0 0,000 o.bdddd 1 15,000 1' 1 5 .6 6 0 17.04 Computer Education 0 0,000 o,oddbd 1 50,'dod T 50.000 0 o,6dd o.doooo' 1 so.oob r' 5 0 .0 0 6 17.05 Urban deprived (Children 0 o.oool o.doWo^ 1 s'doo 1 s.ooo 0 0.000 dbddoo' 1 5.000 1 5 ,0 0 0 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 loo.bbb 0 0.000 1 100.000 1 100.000 1 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0.000 0.00060 11920 7.152 11920 7,152 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 18100 10,860 18100 10,860 S u b Total 0 0.000 11920 7.152 11920 7.152 0 0.000 18100 10.860 18100 iQ.iseo To ta l SSA 0 o:oo6 237384 3309.692 2373^4 3309.692 0 0.000 498122 10086'.882 498122 19 State Component 19.1 Management Cost 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 o.doooo 0 0.000 0 0.000 19.2 REMS 6 0.000 0,00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.00000 0 O.ddO d o.ddd S u b Total 0 o.bod 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.bbd 0 0.000 0 o.bob Total SSA^-State Component d 0.000 0.000 498122 10086.882 498122 20 NPEGEL 0 0,000 0.00000 orodo 0 0,000 0 d.ddd 0,00000 196 142.803 '196 142,'803 Total NPEGEI 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 196 14Z803 196 142.803 21 KGPV 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0 0.000 Total Non Recurrint! 0 0,000 0,00000 0 d,ooo 0 O.OdO 0 . d d 405.900 Total Recurring 5 0 0,000 o.bdodd 0 0,000 0 0,000 d 0.000 0.00000 16 405 9 16 T o t a l K G B V 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 ' 0.000 0 0.000 16 405.900 16 405.900 Grand Total (SSA*NPEGEL+KGBV) 0 o.doo 0.000 498334 10635.58i^ 49833*4 10635.585 (Rs. lakhs) State (!iomponent Grand Yotal S pill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over Spill O v e r from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total incl. spill over S.N. C o m po n en t Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 1 A. Now School 1.01 New Primary School (for 10 to 25 children) 0 b.OQO o.ooo(bo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1.02 New Primary School (for >25 children) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 ,0 0 0 1 0 ,0 0 0 1.03 Upgradation of PS to UPS 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Qj 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 190 0 ,0 0 0 190 0 .0 0 0 S u b To tal 0 0 0 0 191 191 2 N. Teachers Salary 2.01 New PS New Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0.16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 6 0 .0 0 0 3.19 2 0,336 2 0,336 2.02 New UPS Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0,21600 0 ' 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 3.83 570 114,570 570 114,570 2.03 New UPS Teachers Salary Sk-lll 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0,060 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 2.04 New Head Master Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 6:0066b 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 New UPS teachers for UPS sanctioned in 2.05 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1.40 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2002-04 Additional Teacher Against PTR 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0.000 .0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,000 0 0.000 2.06 New Additional Teacher Pri. SK-III 0 0.000 0,00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.07 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-II 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 2.08 New Addl. Teacher - UPS SK-lil 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.ocio 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 New teachers-SKIII for Gyan Jyoti having >40 2.09 0 .0 0 0 0,16800 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 3.19 540 90.720 540 90,720 children 0 S u b To tal 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 1 2 205.626 1 1 1 2 205.626 Teachers Salary (Recurring) 1 iT', 2.10 Primary Teachers Salary SK-III 0 0 .0 0 0 0,84000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 15.96 17218 14463.120 17218 14463,120 2.11 U P S Teachers Salary SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98400 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 18.62 19760 19364,800 19760 19364.800 2.12 UPS Teachers Salary SK-III 6 0 ,0 6 0 0.84000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ' 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 15.96 1603 1346.520 1603 1346,520 2.1S Additional Teacher PS SK-III 0 0.000 0.84000 0 0 .0 6 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 15,96 11445 9613.800 11445 9613,800 2.16 Additional Teacher UPS SK-II 0 0 .0 0 0 0.98400 0 0,006 0 0.060 0 0 .0 0 0 18,62 2789 2733.220 2789 2733,220 2.17 Additional Teacher UPS SK-Ill 0 0 .0 0 0 0.84000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 15.96 2170 1822.800 2170 1822.800 2.18 Para Teacher® 0 0,000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,00 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 2.19 Other Salary Arriers 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0.660 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 S u b To ta l 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 54985 49344.260 54985 49344.260 3 M. Teacher Grant ' 3.01 Primary Teacher Grant 0 0.006 0.00500 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,10 83546 417.730 83546 417,730 3.02 Upper Primary Teacher Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .1 0 50792 253.960 50792 253.960 S u b Total 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 134338 671.690 134338 671.690 4 B. Block Resource Centre 4.01 Salary of Resource Persons 0 0 ,0(30 0.79200 0 o.odo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 15,05 868 687.456 868 687,456 4.02 Furniture Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 0.000 6 0.000 0 0.000 9.50 0 0,000 0 0,000 4.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.600 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 3.80 146 29,200 146 29,200 4.0^ l^eeting T.A. 0 0.000 0.09000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.060 1.71 146 13,140 146 13.140 4.05 T L M Grant 0 0.000 0.05000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.95 146 7.300 146 7,300 S ub Total 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 146 737.096 146 737.096 5 C. Cluster Resource Centre 5.01 Salary of RP 0 0,006 0,00000 0 6,00c) 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,00 0 0,000 0 0,000 5.O2I Furniture Grant 6 0,000 0,10000 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 o.ooo 1,90 0 0.000 0 0,000 5.03 Contingency Grant 0 0.000 0,03000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0.57 2169 ' 65.070 2169 65,070 5.04 Meeting T.A. 0 0,000 0,03600 0 0.000 0 0,000 0 0,000 0.68 2169 78,084 2169 78,084 5.05 T L M Grant 0 0.000 0,01000 0 0.066 0 0,000 0 0,000 0.19 2169 21,690 2169 21,690 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 2169 164.844 2169 164.844 6 P. Teachers Training 6.01 Inservice (10 days at Block level) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,19 126121 1261.210 126121 1261.210 6.02 Inservice (10 days at Cluster) 0 0 ,0 0 0 0.00500 0 o;6o6 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,10 126121 630,605 126121 630,605 6.03 New Recruit Trained ( 30days) 0 0 .0 0 0 0.03000 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0.57 1112 33.360 1 1 1 2 33,360 (Hs. lakhs) ...... State Component brand Total Spill Ovefffdm 2008-09 Fresh Recdmrfiendatiori Total incl. spill over Spill Over from 2008-09 Fresh Recommendation’ Total incl, spit) over §.N. C o m po n en t 2009-10 2009-10 Phy. Fin. U n it co st Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. U nit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 6.04 Untrained (60days) 0 0.000 0.06000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.060 1.14 8217 493.020 8217 493.020 6.06 Other (DRG/BRG/CRG) ( 5days) 6 o!6oo 0.00500 d o.oeb 0 d.ooo 0 0.0001 0.10 2315 11.575 2315 11.575 S u b Total , d o.boo 0 0.000 0 o.odo 0 o.odo 263886 2429.770 263886 2429.770 7 Interventions for Out of School Children 7.01 AIE (i) N R B C (P ) 0 0.000 0.02829 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.54 5031 142.327 5031 142,327 (il) N R B C (U P ) 0 0.000 0.02829 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.ood 0.54 3476 98.336 3476 98.336 (iii) Seasonal Hostels for Migrants (Residential) 0 0.000 0.05000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.95 1131 56.550 1131 56.550 (iv) Dormitory for Tribal Students(Residential) ' 0 0.000 0.10000 0 0.000 0 6.000 0 0.000 1.90 1200 120,000 1200 120.000 (V) Bridge Course Residential (PS) 0 0.000 0.0685b 0 o.ddd 0 o.ood 0 0.000 1,29 20485 1392.980 20485 1392.980 |vi) Bridge Course Residential (UP) 0 0.000 0.06800 0 b.dod 0 o.dSo 0 0.000 1.29 18571 1262.82^ l'8571 1262.828 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 6.000' 0 d.ooo 0 0.000 49894 3073.021 49894 3073.021 8 Remedial Teaching 8.01 Remedial Teaching 0 0.000 0.00200 0 o.ood 0 0.000 0 0.000 0,04 138678 397.356 198678 397,356 S ub Total 0 0.000 0 0.066 0 o.ood 0 0.000 198678 397.356 198678 397.356 9 F. Free Text Book 9.01 Free Text Book(P) 0 0.000 0.00096 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.02 2425721 2328.692 2425721 2328,692 9.02 Free Text Book (UP) 0 0.000 0.002'Od 6 o.ood 0 o.doo 0 0.000 0.04 943046 1961.536 943046 1961,536 S ub Total 0 0.000 0 d.ooo d 0.000 0 0.000 3368767 4290.228 3368767 4290.228 10 H. Interventions for Disabled Children 0 0.000 0.01200 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.23 46153 553.836 46153 553,836 S ub Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 46153 553.836^ 46153 553.836 11 Civil Works 11.01 B R C 0 0.000 4.00000 0 0.000 0 o.doo 0 0.000 76.00 6 0.000 0 0.000 11.02 CRC 0 o".dob 2'.ododd 0 o.ood 0 0.000 0 34.402 38.00 0^ b.ddo 0 34,402 11.03 Primary School (40 children) 0 0.000 4.65000 0 0.000 0 o.obo 0 2.610 88.35 1 4.650^ 1 7.260 11.04 Primary School (10 children) 0 o.do6 2.00000 0 0.060' 0 0.000 d 12.000 38.00 0 o.odo 0 12,000 11.05 Upper Primary School 0 0 .6 6 6 5.17b6d 0 0.000 0 o.boo 0 41.360 98.23 190 982.300 190 1023,660 Prefabricate'd School Building in Dantewada 11.06 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 district (500 seater) 0.000 0.00000 0 0.000 0.00 0.000 0 0.000 Biiilcjing for Primary School sanctioned in 11.07 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 previous years under SSA (10 children) 0.000 0.00000 0.000 0 0,00 Building for Primary 'School sanctioned iri 11.08 0 0 .0 0 0 4.65000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 30.500 88,35 0 0 .0 0 0 0 30.500 previous years under SSA ^40 children) Building for Upper Primary ^"chool sanctioned 11.09 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0,000 0 59.226 98.23 0 .0 0 0 0 59.226 in previous years under S S A 5.17000 0 0.000 0 11.10 Additional Class Room(PS) 0 0 .0 0 0 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 46.000 38.00 3243 6486.000 3243 6532.000 11.11 Additional Class Room(UPS) 0 o.dod 2.60606 0 b.odb 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 38.0d 2248 4496.000 22'48 4496.000 11.12 Toilet/Urinals(PS) 6 o.ooo 0.6600b 0 o.ddd d 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0,75 0 0 .0 0 0 0 o.doo 11.13 Separate Girls toilet 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50000 0 o.doo 0^ 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 9,50 0 o.odo 0 b.bdo 11.14 Water Facility 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OO6OO 0 o.ddd’ b 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 o.od 0 0-dod 0 b.ooo 11.15 Boundary Wall 0 o.doo’ o.bdo'ob 0 o.ood 0^ 0.000 0 O.odo oVod 0 d.obb 0 0 .0 0 0 11.16 Separation Wall 0 b.66d o.ooo'od 0 0.000 0 0.000 “ 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 11.17 Electrification 0 0 .0 0 0 o.doooo 0 o.doo d 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 O.OO 0 o.odo d 0 .0 0 0 11.18 Head Master's Room ■ 6 0.000 0.00000 0 o’.ddd’ 0 0 .0 0 0 o' 0 .0 0 0 O.oo 0 d.o66 ' d 0 .0 0 0 11.19 Ashramshala (Residential Schools) 0 o.bdo' d 0.060 0 0.000 0 0.066 702.47 61 2199.6’55" 61 2199.050 11.20 Major Reipairs (Primary) 0 o.doo o.'ooddo o"^ o.odo"^ 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 221.10 0 o.ood 0 0 .0 0 0 11.21 Major Reipairs (Upper Primary) 0 o.odo 0.00000 0 o.ddd 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 61.46 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 11.22 BALA Concept (in Go^. UPS) 0 d.o6d 0.00000 0 0.000 o' 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 o.dd 0 o.'do6 0 o.obo 11.23 Other (Boundary Wall) 0 o.o6d o:oobod o' o.dbd 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 o.ood 0 0 .0 0 0 11.24 Furniture for Govt. UPS students d d.o5o 0.00^00 0^ 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.boo 0.01 0 d.ooo O' 0 .0 0 0 Sub Totat(Clvll Works) 6 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 226.098 5743 14168.0d6 5743 14394.098 Furniture for Govt. UPS (Rs. lakhs) State domponent Grand Total Spill Over from 2OO8-09 Fresh Recommendation 2009-10 Total ind- #PiH over Spill Over from 2003-C 9 Fresh Recommendation 2009- t 0 Total Incl. spill over S.N. C o m p o n e n t Phy. Fin. U ntt co st Phy. R n . Phy. fin . Phy. Fin. Unit cost Phy. Fin. Phy. Fin. 11.25 No. of Children 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .1 0 14107 70.535 14107 70.535 Sub Total(Fumlture; 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.10 14107 70,535 14107 70.535 Sub Total (CiviHFumiture] 0 0.000 0.00500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 226.098 0.10 19850 14238.535 19850 14464.633 12 0 . Teaching Learning Equipment 12.01 TLE - New Primary 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 3.80 1 0 .2 0 0 1 0 .2 0 0 12.02 TLE - New Upper Primary 0 0 .0 0 0 o.soooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 9.50 190 95.000 190 95.000 12.03 Other (TLE) 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.50 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 191 95.200 191 95.200 13 1. Maintenance Grant 13.01 Maintenance Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.07500 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1.43 41519 2663.050 41519 2663.050 S u b Total 0 o.obo 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 41519 2663.050 41519 2663.050 14 L. School Grant '1 " 14.01 Primary School Grant 0 O.OOQ 0 .0 2 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0,38 32837 656.740 32837 656.740 14.02 Upper Primary School Grant 0 0 .0 0 0 0.02000 0 0.000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.38 13192 263.840 13192 263,840 S ub To ta 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 46029 920.580 46029 920.580 1 15 K. Research and Evaluation Research, Evaluation, Monitoring & 15.01 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Supervision 0.01300 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0.25 46029 598.377 46029 598.377 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 o.ooo 0 0.000 46029 598.377 46029 598.377 16 Management & MIS 16.01 M a n a g e m e n t & i\/IIS 0 ' 0 .0 0 0 o.ooobo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 .0 0 6 2230.273 6 2230,273 16.02 Learning Enhancement Programme 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.ood 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 56.20 5 1702.000 5 , 1702,000 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 11 3932.273 11 3932.273 17 G. Innovative Activity 17.01 ECCE 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 15.00 18 270.000 18 270,000 17.02 Girls Education 0 o.ooo 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 15.00 18 270.000 18 270.000 17.03 SC/ST Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0.000 16.00 18 270.000 18 270.000 17.04 Computer Education 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 50.00 18 900.000 18 900.000 17.05 Urban deprived Children 0 0.000 0.00000 0 o.ooo 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 5.00 18 90.000 18 90,000 Sub Total Innovation 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 18 1800.000 18 1800.000 18 Q. Community Mobilization 18.1 Q. Community Mobilization 0 0 .0 0 0 0.00060 0 o.ooo b 0.000 0 0,000 0,01 169278 101.567 w § m 101.567 S u b To ta l 0 0.000 9 m o 0 0.000 0 a.eee 169278 101.567 169278 101.567 Total S S A 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 226.098 4443053 86217.309 4443053 86443.407 19 State Component 465.855 465,855 1 9 ,1 Management Cost 0 0.000 0.00000 0 465.855 0 465.855 0 0.000 0.00 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 1 9 .2 R E M S 6 0.000 0.00000 0 0,000 0 0.000 0 0.000 465.855 465.855 S u b Total 0 0.000 0 465.855 0 465.855 0 0.000 0 0 4443053 86683.164 4443053 86909.262 Total SSA*State Component______0 0.000 0 465.855 0 465.855 . .. L .. . 9 226.098 0 .0 0 0 ' 0 0 .0 0 0 0.60 1059 786.946 1059 786.946 2 0 NPEGEL 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 O.OOO 0 1059 786.946 Total NPEGEL 0 0 .000 0 0 .0 00 0 0 .000 0 0.000 1059 786.946 2 1 KGBV 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 Total Non Recurring 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 280.17 93 2359.050 93 2359.050 Total Recurring 0 0.000 0.00000 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 93 2359.050 93 2359.050 T o t a l KGBV 0 o.ocio 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 4444205 89829.160 4444205 90055.257 Grand Total (SSA*NPEGEL-fKGBV) 0 o!ooo 0 465.855 0 465.855 0 226.098