DOCSLIB.ORG

Comments on a Notorious Verd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comments on a Notorious Verd ! ! ! "! Introduction “Comments on a notorious verdict: The trial of Lula” might be the most important judicial document published in Brazil for decades. The present selection of articles came to exist after a spontaneous movement, and significant enough as well, of Brazilian and foreign lawyers who carefully verified the verdict rendered in the extent of the procedure which was processed at the 13ª Vara Federal de Curitiba, in the case that was known at the media as “the Guarujá triplex”. Beyond the unprecedented aspect of the criminal conviction of an ex-President in political circumstances, in thesis not comparable to last century Brazilian dictatorships, the verdict, which in large scale was expected as a non-surprising closure of this criminal process, provoked immediate reaction between the ones who read it and were committed only with the purpose of trying to understand the reasons why Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is being punished for the criminal acts of passive corruption and illicit asset laundering. The certainty of conviction was a fact. Admirers and opponents of the ex-President were aware that there wouldn’t be another verdict. The hesitation was in knowing the conviction reasons, normative requirement of the 1988 Constitution, which by the inevitable political repercussions of the cited procedure, showed the 1987-1988 Constituent’s right act when lifting the decision foundations to the constitutional warranty level of the process. Only recently, after twenty years of an intense judicial battle starred by Fernando Fernandes, by coincidence Paulo Tarciso Okamoto’s lawyer, who is a defendant together with the ex- President in this “Guarujá triplex” case, it was achieved to accomplish the Federal Supreme Court decision, bringing the trials audios to be known which the Superior Military Court (SMC) recorded during 1964-1985 dictatorship. The cited trials, now made public, reveal the democratic virtues of the process publicity and of the decisions motivation. Sentences like “I’m going to take a revolutionary decision, leaving the law aside, because he can’t be convicted in any ways by the law”, said in the trials, by the highest judicial authorities, military and civil, in a secret environment, now known by all who take the effort of listening the audios of that session. The motivation on the decisions and the publicity of the trials are the peaceful weapons of the State of Law against arbitrations and abuses, besides providing the courts with the opportunity of bigger quality and efficiency in the duty of rectifying convictions considered unfair, despite rendered in accordance with the sincere belief that the law was applied to the case. In addition, the judges work, as an expression of the regulated republican activity by a scrupulous group of material and procedural judicial rules, is subjected to be known and evaluated not only by the direct recipients of the verdict. Each person, interested in the luck of an equal subjected to a criminal prosecution, disposes of means and resources to promote a true archeology of the reasons by which someone is convicted or acquitted. The publicity of the process and the decisions motivation work as shields against that type of justification cited above, common at that time at the Superior Military Court (SMC), typical of political trials. In cases in which the condition of the political process isn’t covered by the criminal way with which it presents itself, is by means of scrutiny of the magistrate’s reasons that the citizenship is felt protected or threatened. 3 If the motifs of an occasional conviction correspond to what the actual judicial body predicts and the penal law is being applied in accordance with the dominant understanding of the group of concepts and produced notions by the so called penal dogmatic in Brazil, it is justifiable to assume the conviction and, so, its right action will depend on the rectification of the magistrate’s judgment about the proof evaluation, which must have been produced in an environment of rigorous rules compliance of the due process of law. However, if the concepts and canonical notions of the Brazilian Penal law are put away and, besides, the warranties of this process are vulnerable, the judge appealing to proof evaluation criteria and other procedural practices at least highly questionable, the common converts itself into exception and the alert signs, in the defense of the State of Law, must be set immediately. In the hypothesis there is an expressive consensus that the foreign law apparently substitutes ours, operating itself the phenomenon which Elisabetta Grande calls symbolic circulation of judicial models arising from different scopes of judicial culture and different areas of Law itself.1 The handling of concepts and notions followed this conviction path, reverberating particular convictions and formed presumptions in penal matter with nonconformity concerning the fact analysis supported by proofs. However it is about a simple presentation of the book, it is important to clarify the reader of the meaning, in terms of danger to individuals’ liberties, of converting the exception into rule, as in my opinion it is clear that the conviction is of choice of the magistrate. About the subject Janaina Matida underlines: “The judicial presumption isn’t other but the reasoning about the facts done by the judge; it’s expected that existed in judicial systems in which the directive of free and rational valuation is in force, because it is the judge’s duty to value the proofs with enough information (or not) for the determination of the occurred facts under debate. Its quality is directly attached to the empirical generalization selected by him; so if the generalization is not universal, it, by definition carries the possibility of exception. Therefore, the reasoning construction must attend to demonstrate that the individual case is the rule and not the exception.”2 The condemning reasoning that holds itself on the exception rhetorically appeals to foreign judicial models and incorrectly translates penal concepts – as it jumps to the eyes in the ex- President’s conviction for corruption – making a dead letter of the impossibility of gender transplants warning3, it would provoke a vivid reaction among the Law scholars. The true team of jurists, female and male professors, lawyers and intellectuals who closely followed the process, mobilized themselves when realized the exceptionality in the style and arguments used by the criminal judge in the cited decision. 1 GRANDE, Elisabetta. Imitação e direito: hipóteses sobre a circulação dos modelos. Tradução de Luíz Fernando Sgarbossa. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris, 2009. 2 MATIDA, Janaina. Em defesa de um conceito jurídico de presunção. Tese doutoral. 2017. (Ainda não foi publicada). 3 Por todos: HENDLER, Edmundo S. Derecho. Derecho penal y procesal penal de los Estados Unidos. Buenos Aires: Ad-hoc, 2006. p. 45. 4 Thus, the entire process – and not only the verdict – was written out on the articles the reader has on one’s hands and that are of exclusive responsibility of each author. The hundreds of texts details the procedure, clarifies what rules are actually in force and how they coincide in the case. According to the articles’ authors’ opinions, these rules weren’t attended and its non attendance lead to a rendered unfair decision. It’s relevant to notice that on times of public trial and corresponding publicity of the motivation there is no more space to not applying the law to condemn. Something similar, whatsoever, subverts the logic and would hardly be acceptable especially in this period of political instability and judicial insecurity. Questioning each argument, from its inadequacy to its legal procedures and to the current interpretation configured the method which authors used to verify if and in what measure the due process of law was violated or respected. The probability of the ex-President’s condemnation and its confirmation are more than mere convictions of an extremely problematic process under any perspective. The reader has with oneself more than the work of one hundred and twenty one authors in the version of this book in Portuguese, “Comentários a uma Sentença Anunciada: O Processo Lula” and sixty-five authors in this English version, portrayed on one hundred and three articles which subdue all aspects of the long verdict to the judicious exam that the penal science, Constitutional Law and other knowledge areas consider fundamental to claim the State of Law in Brazil. “Comments on a notorious verdict: The trial of Lula” is a type of Letter of commitment to Citizenship, Democracy and the State of Law. Trusting that the courts will make justice to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is to believe that the statement of the 1970s trials, at the Superior Military Court (SMC) – “I’m going to take a revolutionary decision, leaving the law aside, because he can’t be convicted in any ways by the law” – is definitely buried between us. If there are no crimes, and there aren’t any, the absolution is the only possible decision. In the name of all the authors I thank all who brought this judicial document to life, to this Letter of Commitment to Citizenship, Democracy and the State of Law. Without the exceptional, courageous and determined Professors Carol Proner, Gisele Cittadino, Gisele Ricobom and the combative, tireless Professor João Ricardo Dornelles, what would be the individual resentment concerning the injustice of such a transcendent decision wouldn’t leave place to a document of which is expected to be of effective contribution for the re- establishment of the Empire of Law, with the absolution of the ex-President Lula. Thank you very much, Carol Proner, Gisele Cittadino, Gisele Ricobom e João Ricardo Dornelles. As Miguel Littín once said, clandestine while in Chile, to Garcia Marques: there are acts apparently courageous, but deep down they are a commitment to civic dignity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supremo Tribunal Federal
    Supremo Tribunal Federal Extrato de Ata - 31/08/2016 Inteiro Teor do Acórdão - Página 137 de 138 PLENÁRIO EXTRATO DE ATA AÇÃO DIRETA DE INCONSTITUCIONALIDADE 2.404 PROCED. : DISTRITO FEDERAL RELATOR : MIN. DIAS TOFFOLI REQTE.(S) : PARTIDO TRABALHISTA BRASILEIRO PTB ADV.(A/S) : PAULA ANDREA FORGIONI (105464/SP) ADV.(A/S) : MARCIA LYRA BERGAMO (002197/DF) INTDO.(A/S) : PRESIDENTE DA REPÚBLICA INTDO.(A/S) : CONGRESSO NACIONAL AM. CURIAE. : ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE EMISSORAS DE RÁDIO E TELEVISÃO - ABERT ADV.(A/S) : GUSTAVO BINENBOJM (83152/RJ) E OUTRO(A/S) AM. CURIAE. : AGÊNCIA DE NOTÍCIAS DOS DIREITOS DA INFÂNCIA - ANDI AM. CURIAE. : INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS - INESC ADV.(A/S) : TAMARA AMOROSO GONÇALVES (257156/SP) AM. CURIAE. : CONECTAS DIREITOS HUMANOS ADV.(A/S) : FLÁVIA XAVIER ANNENBERG (310355/SP) AM. CURIAE. : INSTITUTO ALANA ADV.(A/S) : EKATERINE SOUZA KARAGEORGIADIS (236028/SP) E OUTRO(A/S) Decisão: Após os votos dos Senhores Ministros Dias Toffoli (Relator), Luiz Fux, Cármen Lúcia e Ayres Britto, julgando procedente a ação para declarar a inconstitucionalidade da expressão “em horário diverso do autorizado”, contida no art. 254 da Lei nº 8.069/90, pediu vista dos autos o Senhor Ministro Joaquim Barbosa. Impedido o Senhor Ministro Gilmar Mendes. Falaram, pela Advocacia-Geral da União, a Dra. Grace Maria Fernandes Mendonça, Secretária-Geral de Contencioso; pelo amicus curiae Associação Brasileira de Emissoras de Rádio e Televisão – ABERT, o Dr. Gustavo Binenbojm; pelos amici curiae, Agência de Notícias dos Direitos da Infância-ANDI, Instituto de Estudos Socioeconômicos-INESC, Conectas Direitos Humanos e Instituto Alana, a Dra. Eloisa Machado de Almeida, e, pelo Ministério Público Federal, o Procurador-Geral da República, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Supreme Court Full Text of the Decision - ADI 4306 / DF
    Unofficial Translation Federal Supreme Court Full Text of the Decision - ADI 4306 / DF 12/20/2019 PLENARY SESSION DIRECT ACTION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY 4306 FEDERAL DISTRICT REPORTER : JUSTICE EDSON FACHIN PLAINTIFF(S) : NATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF COMMERCE OF GOODS, SERVICES AND TOURISM (CNC) ATTORNEY(S) : NEUILLEY ORLANDO SPINETTI DE SANTA RITA MATTA AND OTHERS DEFENDANT(S) : GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO DEFENDANT(S) : LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO AMICUS CURIAE : ACT - TOBACCO CONTROL, HEALTH PROMOTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION (ACT - PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE) ATTORNEY(S) : CLARISSA MENEZES HOMSI AND OTHERS AMICUS CURIAE : ARY FRAUZINO FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH AND CONTROL ATTORNEY(S) : FRANCISCO DE ASSIS GARCIA AND OTHERS AMICUS CURIAE : NATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF WORKERS IN TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY - CONTRATUH ATTORNEY(S) : AGILBERTO SERÓDIO AND OTHER(S) SUMMARY: DIRECT ACTION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY. CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. LAW NO. 5517 OF 2009, OF RIO DE JANEIRO. PROHIBITION OF SMOKING PRODUCTS IN COLLECTIVE ENVIRONMENTS. LEGITIMATE EXERCISE OF THE STATES COMPETENCE TO SUPPLEMENT FEDERAL LEGISLATION. VIOLATION TO FREE ENTERPRISE. INEXISTENCE. ACTION DISMISSED. 1. In cases in which the doubt about legislative competence falls upon a norm that covers more than one theme, the interpreter must accept an interpretation that does not limit the competence held by the smaller entities to dispose of a certain matter. 2. Because federalism is an instrument of political decentralization that aims to realize fundamental rights, if the federal or state law clearly indicates, in a necessary, adequate, and reasonable manner, that the effects of its application exclude the power of complementation held by the smaller entities, it is possible to rule out the presumption that, in the regional sphere, a certain subject must be regulated by the larger entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Second Edition Vol
    BRAZILIAN FEDERAL SUPREME COURT MAY 2021 CASE LAW COMPILATION COVID-19 SECOND EDITION VOL. 1 BRAZILIAN FEDERAL SUPREME COURT CASE LAW COMPILATION COVID-19 SECOND EDITION VOL. 1 MAY 2021 SECRETARIAT GENERAL OF THE PRESIDENCY INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS OFFICE PEDRO FELIPE DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS RICARDO NEIVA TAVARES CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE PRESIDENCY GRAPHIC AND EDITORIAL PRODUCTION PATRÍCIA ANDRADE NEVES PERTENCE FLÁVIA CARVALHO COELHO ARLANT NEIR DOS REIS LIMA E SILVA GENERAL OFFICE EDMUNDO VERAS DOS SANTOS FILHO PROOFREADING ANA VALÉRIA DE OLIVEIRA TEIXEIRA SECRETARIAT OF MAJOR STUDIES, FLÁVIA TRIGUEIRO MENDES PATRIOTA RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION JULIANA ROLIM NOBRE MAIA MANAGEMENT JULIANA SILVA PEREIRA DE SOUZA ALEXANDRE REIS SIQUEIRA FREIRE NAYSE HILLESHEIM OFFICE OF INFORMATION DIFFUSION COVER AND GRAPHIC DESIGN THIAGO GONTIJO VIEIRA FLÁVIA CARVALHO COELHO ARLANT EDITORIAL STAFF NEIR DOS REIS LIMA E SILVA ALEXANDRE REIS SIQUEIRA FREIRE ROBERTO HARA WATANABE ANA VALÉRIA DE OLIVEIRA TEIXEIRA DIAGRAMMING FERNANDO CARNEIRO ROSA FORTES ROBERTO HARA WATANABE FLÁVIA TRIGUEIRO MENDES PATRIOTA JEAN FRANCISCO CORRÊA MINUZZI JOSÉ ROBERTO SOTERO DE MELLO PORTO LÍVIA GIL GUIMARÃES PEDRO FELIPE DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS THIAGO GONTIJO VIEIRA Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) (Supremo Tribunal Federal — Biblioteca Ministro Victor Nunes Leal) Brasil. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Case law compilation [recurso eletrônico] : Covid-19 / Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. – 2nd ed. rev. and updated. Brasília : STF, Secretaria de Altos Estudos, Pesquisas e Gestão da Informação, 2021. eBook (v.1, 92 p.) Sustainable Development Goals. Os casos da primeira edição foram atualizados com relevantes Informações e agrupados em sete diferentes categorias. Modo de acesso: < www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/cms/ publicacaoPublicacaoTematica/anexo/case_law_compilation_covid19_2.pdf>.
    [Show full text]
  • Estado, Sociedade E Direito / Coordenadores, Lilian Rose Lemos Rocha
    1 Lílian Rose Lemos Rocha Miguel Gualano de Godoy Gabriel R. Rozendo Pinto Leandro Soares Nunes CADERNOS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO ESTADO, SOCIEDADE E DIREITO Organizadores: Gabriel R. Rozendo Pinto Iago Farias Lora João Vitor S. Lopes Leandro Soares Nunes Naiara Ferreira Martins Rafael de Almeida Guimarães Rodrigo Gonçalves Ramos de Oliveira Brasília 2017 CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE BRASÍLIA - UniCEUB Reitor Getúlio Américo Moreira Lopes INSTITUTO CEUB DE PESQUISA E DESENVOLVIMENTO - ICPD Diretor João Herculino de Souza Lopes Filho Diretor Técnico Rafael Aragão Souza Lopes CURSO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO Coordenadora Lilian Rose Rocha Lemos Projeto Gráfico André Luís César Ramos Diagramação Biblioteca Reitor João Herculino Capa UniCEUB/ACC Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Caderno de pós-graduação em direito : estado, sociedade e direito / coordenadores, Lilian Rose Lemos Rocha... [et al.] ; [organizadores] – Gabriel R. Rozendo Pinto... [et al.]. – Brasília: UniCEUB : ICPD, 2017. 48 p. ISBN 978-85-61990-74-9 1. Jurisdição constitucional. I. Centro Universitário de Brasília. II. Título. CDU 342.4 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca Reitor João Herculino Centro Universitário de Brasília – UniCEUB SEPN 707/709 Campus do CEUB Tel. (61) 3966-1335 / 3966-1336 SUMÁRIO PREFÁCIO .................................................................................. 04 APRESENTAÇÃO ........................................................................ 05 RE 636559/SP: DAS CONTRIBUIÇÕES DA SOCIEDADE PARA A ANÁLISE DOS
    [Show full text]
  • Machado Associados Newsletter
    Machado Associados Newsletter STF’s trial related to the inclusion of the ICMS on the PIS/COFINS taxable basis On the trial of Extraordinary Appeal No. 574706 by the Full Bench of the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court, which began yesterday, it was discussed the non-inclusion of the ICMS on the PIS/COFINS taxable basis . Of the current ten Justices, eight rendered votes and the score shows 5 x 3 in favor of the taxpayers’ thesis . It is highly likely that, on the session of March 15, 2017, the trial is concluded favorably to the merits, despite a possible discussion regarding the setting up of a date for the decision to take effect. After both parties presented their oral arguments, the voting commenced with Justice Rapporteur Carmen Lúcia, who voted to grant the taxpayer’s appeal to not include the ICMS on the PIS/COFINS taxable basis, stating, in summary, that amounts that will be transferred should not fall within the concept of revenue. Subsequently, Justice Edson Fachin voted in the sense that the ICMS should be included in the PIS/COFINS taxable basis, denying the extraordinary appeal, which vote was followed by Justices Luis Roberto Barroso and Dias Toffoli. Following the vote of the Justice Rapporteur, Justice Rosa Weber, Justice Luiz Fux, Justice Ricardo Lewandowski, and Justice Marco Aurélio voted to grant the taxpayer’s appeal, establishing that the ICMS should not be included on the PIS/COFINS taxable basis. However, when only Justices Gilmar Mendes and Celso de Mello were left to take their votes, the trial was suspended and will be resumed on the session to be held on March 15.
    [Show full text]
  • LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR a DAILY PUBLICATION of the DIALOGUE Wednesday, April 12, 2017
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR A DAILY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org Wednesday, April 12, 2017 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TODAY’S NEWS Diego Arria Director, Columbus Group ECONOMIC Devry Boughner Vorwerk Corporate VP, Global Corporate Affairs Is Venezuela’s Argentina Cargill Joyce Chang Expecting $14 Bn Global Head of Research, Government in Investment JPMorgan Chase & Co. W. Bowman Cutter This Year Former Partner, Domestic and foreign compa- E.M. Warburg Pincus Irreparably Broken? nies are expected to invest the Dirk Donath Senior Partner, money, making good on previously Catterton Aimara announced investments, said Barry Featherman the head of the government’s Senior Director, Investment and Trade Promotion International Government Affairs, Agency. Gilead Sciences Page 3 Marlene Fernández Corporate Vice President for Government Relations, BUSINESS Arcos Dorados Peter Hakim China Southern President Emeritus, Inter-American Dialogue Airlines Begins Donna Hrinak Flights to Mexico President, Boeing Latin America The inaugural fl ight was the fi rst Jon Huenemann Violent protests, like the one pictured a week ago, have become a regular occurrence this Vice President, U.S. & Int’l Affairs, month in Venezuela. // Photo: Democratic Unity Roundtable. to be operated to Latin America by Philip Morris International a domestic Chinese carrier. James R. Jones Venezuela has been roiled by multiple protests this month, Page 2 Chairman, ManattJones Global Strategies with tens of thousands of anti-government demonstrators Craig A. Kelly marching in Caracas. The unrest was sparked after the POLITICAL Director, Americas International Q Gov’t Relations, Exxon Mobil country’s Supreme Court effectively dissolved the country’s Brazilian Supreme John Maisto legislature but then reversed the move following widespread condem- Court Justice OKs Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supremo Tribunal Federal
    Supremo Tribunal Federal EMB.DECL. NO HABEAS CORPUS 193.726 PARANÁ RELATOR : MIN. EDSON FACHIN EMBTE.(S) :LUIZ INACIO LULA DA SILVA ADV.(A/S) :CRISTIANO ZANIN MARTINS E OUTRO(A/S) EMBDO.(A/S) :SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DECISÃO: 1. Relatório. Trata-se de questão que agora vem de ser exposta no habeas corpus impetrado em 3.11.2020 em favor de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, no qual se aponta como ato coator o acórdão proferido pela Quinta Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça nos autos do Agravo Regimental no Recurso Especial n. 1.765.139, no ponto em que foram refutadas as alegações de incompetência do Juízo da 13ª Vara Federal da Subseção Judiciária de Curitiba para o processo e julgamento da Ação Penal n. 5046512- 94.2016.4.04.7000, indeferindo-se, por conseguinte, a pretensão de declaração de nulidade dos atos decisórios nesta praticados. A impetração é recente (3.11.2020), e pela vez primeira assim apresentada originalmente em relação à ação penal em tela, suscita teses e precedentes que, no âmbito do Supremo Tribunal Federal, foram moldando a definição da competência da 13ª Vara Federal da Subseção Judiciária de Curitiba até o tempo presente. O tema, com efeito, diante de situações similares julgadas pelo Tribunal, nada obstante nos quais restei vencido, atingiu desenvolvimento que propicia, superado o ciclo de maturação temática, análise das respectivas alegações aqui deduzidas. Levei a efeito presentemente no último recesso (a partir de 19 de dezembro e durante o mês de janeiro deste ano de 2021) exame dessa matéria (posta em termos originais na impetração de novembro de 2020), cotejando a linHa evolutiva de seus contornos nesses últimos anos, e ao começo desse período forense restou possível concluir e agora apresentar, em sede dessa prestação jurisdicional, a resposta racional e sistemática à impetração e suas alegações, como sustentam na inicial e petições.
    [Show full text]
  • YOUR EXCELLENCY FATOU BENSOUDA, PROSECUTOR of the INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PARTIDO DEMOCRÁTICO TRABALHISTA – PDT, Registe
    YOUR EXCELLENCY FATOU BENSOUDA, PROSECUTOR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PARTIDO DEMOCRÁTICO TRABALHISTA – PDT, registered under Federal Tax CNPJ/MF No. 00.719.575/0001-69, having its registered office at SAFS - Quadra 02 - Lote 03 (behind the ItaMaraty annex building), Plano Piloto - Brasília/DF, ZIP Code 70042-900, herein, represented by its national president, CARLOS ROBERTO LUPI, Brazilian, single, adMinistrator, bearer of identity card No. 036289023, registered under Federal Tax NuMber CPF/MF No. 434.259.097-20, with eMail address: [email protected] and its registered office at SAFS - Quadra 02 - Lote 03 (behind the ItaMaraty annex building), Plano Piloto - Brasília/DF, ZIP Code 70.042-900, respectfully coMes, through its undersigned Counsel, constituted by power of attorney attached (doc. 01), before Your Excellency, based on articles 15.1 and 53 of the RoMe Statute, to present COMPLAINT against JAIR MESSIAS BOLSONARO, Brazilian President, brazilian, Married, with address at Palácio da Alvorada, SPP Zona Cívico- AdMinistrativa, Brasília, Distrito Federal, ZIP Code 70.150-000, for the criMe against huManity described in article 7, iteM “k”, of the RoMe Statute, endangering the Brazilian people and the world population, as will be duly proved in the following topics. 1 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS I.I LEGAL COUNSEL AND NOTICES The present legal counsel will assist the Plaintiff regarding nuMerous CriMinal attitudes engaged by Mr. Jair Messias Bolsonaro, President of the Federative RepubliC of Brazil. The Plaintiff, Partido DeMoCrático Trabalhista (PDT) will be represented in this coMplaint by the following attorneys, duly registered in the Brazilian Bar Association - OAB: WALBER DE MOURA AGRA (registered under OAB/PE No.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawfare (Or, Simply, War)
    ! ! ! "! 978-987-722-309-5 Introduction “Comments on a notorious verdict: The trial of Lula” might be the most important judicial document published in Brazil for decades. The present selection of articles came to exist after a spontaneous movement, and significant enough as well, of Brazilian and foreign lawyers who carefully verified the verdict rendered in the extent of the procedure which was processed at the 13ª Vara Federal de Curitiba, in the case that was known at the media as “the Guarujá triplex”. Beyond the unprecedented aspect of the criminal conviction of an ex-President in political circumstances, in thesis not comparable to last century Brazilian dictatorships, the verdict, which in large scale was expected as a non-surprising closure of this criminal process, provoked immediate reaction between the ones who read it and were committed only with the purpose of trying to understand the reasons why Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is being punished for the criminal acts of passive corruption and illicit asset laundering. The certainty of conviction was a fact. Admirers and opponents of the ex-President were aware that there wouldn’t be another verdict. The hesitation was in knowing the conviction reasons, normative requirement of the 1988 Constitution, which by the inevitable political repercussions of the cited procedure, showed the 1987-1988 Constituent’s right act when lifting the decision foundations to the constitutional warranty level of the process. Only recently, after twenty years of an intense judicial battle starred by Fernando Fernandes, by coincidence Paulo Tarciso Okamoto’s lawyer, who is a defendant together with the ex- President in this “Guarujá triplex” case, it was achieved to accomplish the Federal Supreme Court decision, bringing the trials audios to be known which the Superior Military Court (SMC) recorded during 1964-1985 dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Nudge Against Covid-19
    COORDINATION AND ORGANIZATION: : Saulo José Casali Bahia Carlos Eduardo Behrmann Rátis Martins Rodolfo Pamplona Filho FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC TIMES AUTHORS: Adriano Sant’Ana Pedra Hilda Ledoux Vargas Agenor de Souza Santos Sampaio Neto Julio Cesar de Sá da Rocha Alessandra Oitaven Pearce Liliane Nunes Mendes Lopes Aloísio Cristovam dos Santos Júnior Luciano Martinez Amanda Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos Mario Jorge Lima Ana Paula da Silva Sotero Marta Carolina Giménez Pereira Antonio Sá da Silva Mirtha Lorena Giménez Pereira Bruna Franco Ricardo Maurício Freire Soares Clóvis Reimão Saulo José Casali Bahia Daniel Oitaven Pearce Pamponet Miguel Stephanie Silva Fábio Periandro de Almeida Hirsch Valdir Ferreira de Oliveira Junior Gabriel Dias Marques da Cruz Welliton da Silva Santos PRESENTATION: Carlos Eduardo Behrmann Rátis Martins PREFACE: Saulo José Casali Bahia AFTERWORD: Rodolfo Pamplona Filho São Paulo - SP Editora IASP | IASP, Publisher 2020 1 ISBN 978-65-87082-10-3 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES IN CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC TIMES Edition and Distribution of IASP PUBLISHER The authors of this work enjoy the widest freedom of opinion and criticism. They are responsible for the ideas and concepts emitted in their work. Instituto dos Advogados de São Paulo - IASP CNPJ 43.198.555/0001-00 Av. Paulista, 1294 - 19º andar - CEP 01310-915 São Paulo - SP - Brasil Founded on November 29, 1874 Site: www.iasp.org.br E-mail: [email protected] ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Total or partial reproduction is prohibited, by any means or process, especially by graphic, microfilm, photographic, reprographic, phonographic, videographic systems. Memorization and / or total or partial recovery, as well as the inclusion of any part of this work in any data processing system, is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR a DAILY PUBLICATION of the DIALOGUE Wednesday, February 8, 2017
    LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR A DAILY PUBLICATION OF THE DIALOGUE www.thedialogue.org Wednesday, February 8, 2017 BOARD OF ADVISORS FEATURED Q&A TODAY’S NEWS Diego Arria Director, Columbus Group POLITICAL Devry Boughner Vorwerk Corporate VP, Global Corporate Affairs What Is the Long- U.S. Lawmakers Cargill Seek Sanctions Joyce Chang Global Head of Research, Term Impact of the Against Offi cials JPMorgan Chase & Co. W. Bowman Cutter in Venezuela Former Partner, Petrobras Scandal? A bipartisan group of 34 legis- E.M. Warburg Pincus lators called on U.S. President Dirk Donath Donald Trump to sanction Senior Partner, Catterton Aimara Venezuelan offi cials responsible for corruption and human rights Barry Featherman Senior Director, abuses. International Government Affairs, Page 2 Gilead Sciences Marlene Fernández Corporate Vice President for BUSINESS Government Relations, Arcos Dorados Workers at Peter Hakim Escondida Mine President Emeritus, Inter-American Dialogue Plan to Strike Donna Hrinak Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Edson Fachin (pictured) was tapped last week to handle Thursday President, Boeing Latin America cases related to the Petrobras corruption case following the death last month of Justice Teori Jon Huenemann Zavascki. // File Photo: Brazilian Government. Talks between workers and mine Vice President, U.S. & Int’l Affairs, owners over a benefi t package Philip Morris International The number of suspects in Brazil’s massive Petrobras broke down. James R. Jones corruption case is expected to double following confes- Page 3 Chairman, ManattJones Global Strategies sions from former executives of construction conglomerate Q POLITICAL Craig A. Kelly Odebrecht, the case’s lead prosecutor said Jan. 26. How Director, Americas International Gov’t Relations, Exxon Mobil well are the country’s judiciary and prosecutors handling the case? How Prosecutors John Maisto does the recent sudden death of Supreme Court Justice Teori Zavascki, Seek Arrest of Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Edição De Legislação* Notícias Tjerj* Notícias Stf*
    Rio de Janeiro, 17 de junho de 2015 - Edição nº 98 SUMÁRIO Outros Links: Edição de Legislação Julgados Indicados Notícias TJERJ Embargos infringentes Notícias STF Embargos infringentes e de nulidade Atos Oficiais Notícias STJ Informativo do STF nº 788 (novo) Informes de Referências Doutrinárias Notícias CNJ Informativo do STJ nº 562 (novo) Sumários-Correntes de Direito Avisos do Banco Ementário (nova edição) Súmula da Jurisprudência TJERJ Revista Jurídica do Conhecimento PJERJ Revista Direito em Movimento(EMERJ) Conflito de Competência - Eficácia Vinculante : Aviso 15/2015, Aviso nº 25/2015 ,Aviso 29/2015 e Aviso 33/2015 EDIÇÃO DE LEGISLAÇÃO* Lei nº 13.134, de 16.6.2015 - Altera as Leis no 7.998, de 11 de janeiro de 1990, que regula o Programa do Seguro-Desemprego e o Abono Salarial e institui o Fundo de Amparo ao Trabalhador (FAT), no 10.779, de 25 de novembro de 2003, que dispõe sobre o seguro-desemprego para o pescador artesanal, e no 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991, que dispõe sobre os planos de benefícios da Previdência Social; revoga dispositivos da Lei no 7.998, de 11 de janeiro de 1990, e as Leis no 7.859, de 25 de outubro de 1989, e no 8.900, de 30 de junho de 1994; e dá outras providências. Fonte: Presidência da República VOLTAR AO TOPO NOTÍCIAS TJERJ* Sábado, 20 de junho, é dia de Justiniano e Teodora no 'Por Dentro do Palácio' Mutirão carcerário vai analisar prisões provisórias do estado do Rio Exposição 'Mulher, Direito e Sociedade: o feminino na construção da Justiça' no Fórum de Itaboraí Jornada de Direito Civil debate o tema Doações Desembargadores negam recurso de banco em processo de cobrança indevida Fonte: DGCOM VOLTAR AO TOPO NOTÍCIAS STF* Ministro Edson Fachin é empossado no STF Em sessão solene realizada no Plenário do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), nesta terça-feira (16), tomou posse como novo ministro da Corte o advogado Luiz Edson Fachin.
    [Show full text]