Stenography and Literature: What Did Western European and Russian Writers Master the Art of Shorthand Writing For? *

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stenography and Literature: What Did Western European and Russian Writers Master the Art of Shorthand Writing For? * Studia Slavica Hung . 64 / 1 ( 201 9 ) 1 – 11 DOI : 10 . 1556 / 060 . 201 9 . 641 0 1 Stenography and Literature: What did Western European and Russian Writers Master the Art of Shorthand Writing For? * IRINA ANDRIANOVA Web - лаборатория Института филологии, Петрозаводский государственный университет, пр. Ленина, д. 33, RU - 185910 Петрозаводск E - mail: [email protected] (Received: 3 March 201 9 ; accepted: 2 June 2019 ) The word stenography is of Greek origin ( στενός ‘ narrow, compact ’ and γράφω ‘ to write ’ ). This is the name of fast handwriting made by means of special signs and acronyms, permi tting a person to listen to oral spee ch and record it simulta - neously, and also to improve writing techniques. Stenography is often taken for steganography , created when the first personal computers appeared ( from Greek στεγανός ‘ covered, concealed , or pro tected ’ and γράφω ‘ to write ’ ), a way of secret conveyance of information by means of keeping the fact of communication secret . At the moment , the latter one is widely in use and studied all over the world (linguistic, digital, network steganography , etc . ) whereas , in contrast, stenography in the age of technological progress is essential for only few numb er of people and became a “ dying art ” (S UMMERS 2011). Two centuries ago , being in fact a “photo” of true speech , stenography caused a revo - lution in the wo rld but its history did not last forever… Having a ppear ed in Ancient Egypt , stenography is already more than 2 , 000 years of age. However, the first public use of stenography in history occurred in 63 B . C. in Ancient Rome. Then , the Senate in Sessions used “Tironian notes” in - vented by Tiro, a personal assistant of the orator Cicero. It was back in the 17th century that the symbolic, word or syllabic stenographic writing changed into a sound, alphabetical writing. Initially, stenography became widespread in England, France, Italy, Germany, and Austria – Hungary at the end of the 18th and the first third of the 19th century. 1 In Russia , stenography found practical use only in the 1860s when the judicial reform was implemented. Bar and jury associations as well a s public hearing were established , and therefore , “specialists in stenography were in demand for keeping records of hearings [ … ] in courts of justice” ( Ю РКОВ - 2 СКИЙ 1969: 56). * The paper was funded by RFBR, project number 17 - 34 - 01075 “ Anna Dostoevska y a ’ s Steno - graphic Records: new materials and findings ”. 1 About the history of stenography in European countries see A NDERSON 1882, B UTLER 1951. 2 About the history of stenography in Russia see Е РШОВ 1880, L OVELL 2015. 0039 - 3363 / $ 2 0 . 00 © 201 9 Akadémiai Kiadó , Budapest 2 Irina Andrianova All over the world , stenography was primarily used at meetings, sessions of stat e and public organizations, legislative, judicial , and other institutions. The in - vention of stenography was “comparable to the invention of printing , which gave an opportunity for the rapid spread of education by accelerating the exchange of ideas” ( Д ЛУСС КИЙ 1874: 25). For European and Russian public of that time , steno - graphy was not just a manner of rapid writing but art and science as well. In the 19th century , it was believed that “in more or less distant future , common writing would be replaced by sho rthand” ( Е РШОВ 1880: 4). “For the first time ever , human beings had a technology that allowed the written word to keep pace with speech and accurately record it” (L OVELL 2015: 291). It significantly saved time and ren - dered invaluable support to people in various activities. Many of those mastered shorthand or engaged professional stenographers to work. For example, the popular English memo i rist Samuel Pepys (1633 – 1703), the physicist and mathematician Isaac Newton (1642 – 1727), the prominent poli - tician, di plomat, and philosopher of the Age of Enlightment Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826), the German zoologist Alfred Brehm (1829 – 1884), the Russian chem - ist Dmitri I. Mendeleev (1834 – 1907), the father of Russian aviation Nikola i Ye . Zhukovsky (1847 – 1921), the geolo gist and paleontologist Vladimir О. Kovalevsky (1842 – 1883), the physiologist Ivan P. Pavlov (1849 – 1936), the agrochemist Dmitri N. Pr y anishnikov (1865 – 1948), theatre directors Konstantin S. Stanislavsky (1863 – 1938) and Nikola i М. Gorchakov (1898 – 1958) , and others. Authors faced a seemingly impracticable task “ to write down everything you think o f ” . They were manual labourers as far as their thoughts “were hanging” at the tip of the pen. The perfection of writing process had an effect on such char - acteristic s of their work as the minimization of physical efforts, time , and paper. M. I. Ivanin ( 1801 – 1874), an inventor of the first shorthand system in Russian, rightly pointed out: “There is no such thing as a poet or a writer who at the mo - ments of inspiration would n o t wish to write down on a paper his impressions and ideas but common writing due to its slowness stifles the imagination, the inspira - tion ceases, and he transfers to the paper just a faint outline of the thoughts inspir - ing him; [ … ] whilst shortha nd can follow every idea, passion, feeling , and expres - sion that is catching on every word and expression quickly” ( И ВАНИН 1858: 20) . The purpose of this research is to reveal the role of stenography in the crea - tive process of European and Russian writers and to draw social attention to the problem of the revival of interest in shorthand and the maintenance of this art . Some researchers have uttered a curious opinion that a skilful approach of using shorthand was applied back in the times of the English poet and playwright W illiam Shakespeare (1564 – 1616). 3 To their mind, his plays were written down i n secret by stenogra phers who used to attend the performances in the Globe Theatre. Those people were sent by rivals in order to get the text of the talented playwright ’ s writings and make them performed on stages of other theatres without the author ’ s permission. Later, the scholars detected a large number of mistakes in the publica - 3 This viewpoint is given in S CHMIDT 1886, A DAMS 1933, D AVIDSON 2009. Studia Slavica Hung . 64 , 201 9 Stenography and Literature : Western European and Russian Writers 3 tions of Shakespeare ’ s plays that might be the result of imperfection of shorthand at that time. If this hypothesis is true, it turns out that readers and spectators in the 21st century can enjoy many works of the great Shakespeare thanks to those ste - nographers - “thieves” of the 16 th and early 17th centuries . Nevertheless, “scholars today seem to overwhelmingly favour other explanations for textual inconsisten - cies in some of Shakespeare ’ s early pr inted works” (F LAVIN ). We know four European writers mastering shorthand who lived and worked in different periods: Daniel Defoe (1660 – 1731), Charles Dickens (1812 – 1870), George Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950) , and Astrid Lindgren (1907 – 2002) . Daniel Defoe, t he a uthor of Robinson Crusoe studied stenography at a dissent - ing academy. “He grew up during the period of greatest repression of nonconform - ists, learned to read on the Bible, as a child piously copied out large sections of it in shorthand when a rumor went around that the High Churchmen were going to con - fiscate the dissenters ’ scriptures” ( D OS P ASSOS 1954: 46 ). Shorthand skills helped Defoe in his further professional activities as a spy, 4 a newsman , 5 and a writer . 6 The prominent novelist Charles Dickens le arnt stenography at the age of 16 to 18 years based on the manual by Thomas Gurney. He practiced it while work - ing as a free lance reporter at Doctors Commons courts from 1829 to 1831, and as a parliamentary reporter from 1831 to 1832 ( for more, see B OWLES 2017a) . It is not a coincidence that one of the brightest Dickensian heroes , David Copperfield has autobiographical features and is a parliamentary stenographer. The writer ’ s personal experience underlies David ’ s story about how he mastered stenography: “I bought an approved scheme of the noble art and mystery of stenography [ … ] and plunged into a sea of perplexity that brought me, in a few weeks, to the con - fines of distraction. The changes that were rung upon dots, which in such a posi - tion meant such a t hing, and in such another position something else, entirely dif - ferent; the wonderful vagaries that were played by circles; the unaccountable con - sequences that resulted from marks like flies ’ legs…” ( D ICKENS 1850: 385) . In the end, David Copperfield (as w ell as his creator) successfully learnt the skills of shorthand: “I have tamed that savage stenographic mystery” ( D ICKENS 1850: 443) . According to Hugo Bowles, “shorthand had become an integral part of his writing practice and although very little of his s horthand survives, he is known to have used it to draft articles, reports, letters, memos, and private notes throughout his writing career” ( B OWLES 2017 a ) . In 1856 , in his letter to Wilkie Collins , Dick - ens wrote: “I daresay I am at this present writing th e best shorthand writer in the world” (H OGARTH – D ICKENS 1893 : 399) . Stenography seems to have helped him in literary activity , too . Researchers believe that stenographic skills had an imp act on Dickens ’ s artistic style character - ized by “orality”, a tendenc y to use a “phonographic turn” , and to prove what they 4 About the activity of Defoe as a spy see, for instance, F URBANK – O WENS 2016. 5 From 1704 to 1713, he alone published the newspaper A Review of the Affairs of Fr ance .
Recommended publications
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/research/westminsterresearch The administrator character from Renaissance humanism to modernism: an examination of the authorial tradition of using characterisation to represent the mundane processes of their contemporary soundings, and as means through which to engage in discourses of power Martin Dempsey Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © The Author, 2015. This is an exact reproduction of the paper copy held by the University of Westminster library. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Users are permitted to download and/or print one copy for non-commercial private study or research. Further distribution and any use of material from within this archive for profit-making enterprises or for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: (http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 1 THE ADMINISTRATOR CHARACTER FROM RENAISSANCE HUMANISM TO MODERNISM An examination of the authorial tradition of using characterisation to represent the mundane processes of their contemporary soundings, and as means through which to engage in discourses of power. MARTIN DEMPSEY A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Note to Users
    NOTE TO USERS Page(s) not included in the original manuscript are unavailable from the author or university. The manuscript was microfilmed as received. This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI Text Unity and Cohesion of Dostoevshy' s Writer's Diary by Peter Sekirin A PhD Thesis Graduate Department of Slavic University of Toronto 1999 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Weilingîcm OtiawaON KlAON4 OaawaON KlAW Canada CaMda The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/£h, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Dissertation Abstract Text Unity and Cohesion of Dostoevsky's A Writer's Diary by Peter Sekinn This is the first rnonographic study of Dostoevsky's Writer's Diary. Fyodor Dostoevsky dedicated ten years of his life to the Diary, which is about 1,200 pages long, and is one of his most important works.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Writer Visible: the Dostoevsky Museum in St
    Making the Writer Visible: the Dostoevsky Museum in St. Petersburg Anna Boldyreva Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: Alexandra Kowalski Daniel Monterescu CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2009 Abstract This project challenges the traditional notion of a museum as a special place that is held by many museum professionals and museum goers, as well as museum sociologists. Instead, it suggests approaching a museum as a set of practices performed by the people who work there. The peculiarity of these practices comes not from some specific qualities of a museum enterprise but from the tools that museum workers have at their disposal. In case of the Dostoevsky Museum such tools are the personal belongings of the writer, by means of which they make such an abstract notion as Dostoevsky’s genius personality visible and their statements about him credible. Key words: museum, material objects, personality, genius. CEU eTD Collection i Pushkin was sitting at his place thinking: "I am a genius, that’s ok. Gogol is a genius too. But Tolstoy is a genius as well; and Dostoevsky, may he rest in peace, - too! When will be the end to all this?" And at that moment it all ended. - Daniil Kharms - CEU eTD Collection ii Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. Sociology as a de-mystification project..................................................................................4 1.0. Mystification vs. de-mystification.......................................................................................................4 1.1. First to de-mystify a laboratory and then the rest of the world.....................................................5 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • N I,—Co-'L\'I Minor Profess©
    DOSTOEVSKY'S CONCEPTION OF LOVE APPROVED: Major Profe»®©ar N i,—Co-'L\'i Minor Profess© #'. ^. r ftMM Direct*** of the Department of English Dean of the Graduate School DOSTOEVSKY'S CONCEPTION OF LOVE THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Marie R. Lewis* B. A. Benton, Texas August, 1965 TABUS or CONTENTS Chmptot L INTRODUCTION I a DOSTOEVSKXAN .LOVE—AN .ASPECT OF THE DICHOTOMY SEEN IN MS LIFE AMD REFLECTS© IN HIS FICTION . , 8 in. TUB INSULTED AMP THE ItOTRED»«A FIRST ' iESOw® or ;fiffWX£iW^F iiovi . u IV. RASKOLNIKDV*S BURDEN OF LOVE 23 V, DOSTOIEVSKY'S DUALITY OF LOVE AS SEEN IN THE IDIOT 45 VL BY LOVE JPOSSESSED 55 VII. SYNTHESIS IN THE BROTHERS KARAMASOV .... 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 93 Ui CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION With one foot resting In nineteenth*century Russia--where the light of English and Western European Romanticism scarcely penetrated- and the other foot reaching across the years for a foothold in the twentieth century, the giant figure of Dostoevsky looms against the horison of man's search for that greatness of mind and spirit which all true art and literature record. Critic# have found it easy to fragment those aspects of Dostoevsky's fiction which support their particular beliefs and to ignore those which do not fit into their own organized systems of thought. He has been acclaimed as a social humanitarian, as a political prophet, as a psychologist, a® a theologian, and as a philosopher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Russian Family in the Works of These Three Authors
    THE CRISIS OF THE RUSSIAN FAMILY IN THE WORKS OF DOSTOEVSKY, TOLSTOY AND CHEKHOV A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Russian Studies at the University of Canterbury by Aliandra Antoniacci University of Canterbury 2015 1 Contents Note on Translation and Transliteration .................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER ONE ...................................................................................................................... 44 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 44 The Family in Crisis in The Diary of a Writer (1876-77)........................................................ 49 The Brothers Karamazov ......................................................................................................... 61 The Karamazov Family............................................................................................................ 65 Relationship of Humans with God in the Family Problematic ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Chekhov Professor Liza Knapp Columbia University
    THE GIANTS OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE : TURGENEV , D OSTOEVSKY , TOLSTOY , AND CHEKHOV COURSE GUIDE Professor Liza Knapp COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY The Giants of Russian Literature Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Chekhov Professor Liza Knapp Columbia University Recorded Books ™ is a trademark of Recorded Books, LLC. All rights reserved. The Giants of Russian Literature: Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Chekhov Professor Liza Knapp Executive Producer John J. Alexander Executive Editor Donna F. Carnahan RECORDING Producer - David Markowitz Director - Matthew Cavnar COURSE GUIDE Editor - James Gallagher Design - Ed White Lecture content ©2006 by Liza Knapp Course guide ©2006 by Recorded Books, LLC 72006 by Recorded Books, LLC Cover image: Leo Tolstoy plowing a field © Clipart.com #UT084 ISBN: 978-1-4281-1294-0 All beliefs and opinions expressed in this audio/video program and accompanying course guide are those of the author and not of Recorded Books, LLC, or its employees. Course Syllabus The Giants of Russian Literature: Turgenev, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Chekhov About Your Professor ................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Lecture 1 Introduction: Fiction, Love, and Death in the Russian Context ............. 6 Lecture 2 Ivan Turgenev: A Russian Novelist at Home and Abroad; Relations in Fathers and Sons ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Literary Conflicts Over the Antinihilist Novel, 1861-1881
    † Designated as an Exemplary Final Project for 2020-21 Russian Literary Conflicts over the Antinihilist Novel, 1861-1881 Muhammad Ali Faculty Advisor: Dr. Martin A. Miller Department of History April 2021 This project was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program in the Graduate School of Duke University. Copyright by Muhammad Ali 2021 Abstract This thesis examines the representation of nihilism in antinihilist and radical novels written in post-emancipation Tsarist Russia, between 1861 and 1881. During this period, nihilism emerged as a social and political phenomenon and contributed not only to the emerging differences between the generation of the “superfluous men” (1840s) and of the prominent literary critics (1860s), but also to the radicalization of a segment of society. As a result, it was actively discussed and debated in most of the literature produced in this period. I have limited my analysis to three of the maJor works written during this time: Ivan Turgenev's Fathers and Sons, Nikolai Chernyshevsky's What Is To Be Done?, and Fyodor Dostoevsky's Demons. Through my analysis of literary conflicts within these novels, I have explicated connections between the novels, identified influences over the authors and explored how representations of nihilism evolved within Russian society during the 1860s and the 1870s. i Table of Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]