DOCSLIB.ORG

European Polygraph 2019, Volume 13, Number 3 (49)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Polygraph 2019, Volume 13, Number 3 (49) European Polygraph PUBLISHED QUARTERLY Volume 13 2019 Number 3 (49) Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph Journal of Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of pol- ygraph examinations. These include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysi- ology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews published in European Polygraph solely reflect the experience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Their publication does not imply any form of endorsement on be- half the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, often contradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergei Aleskovskyi (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Tuvya T. Amsel (Tel Aviv, Israel) Avital Ginton (Tel Aviv, Israel) Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Publisher Council Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski James Matte (Williamsville, USA) Krakow University Alexandr B. Pielenicyn (Moscow, Russia) Klemens Budzowski Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) Maria Kapiszewska David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) Zbigniew Maciąg Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) Jacek M. Majchrowski Gintaras Švedas (Vilnius, Lithuania) Igor Usikov (Kiev, Ukraine) Jennifer M.C. Vendemia (Columbia, United States) Jan Widacki (Krakow, Poland) Copyright© by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Daniel T. Wilcox (Birmingham, United Kingdom) Krakow University Krakow 2019 Editor-in-Chief Jan Widacki [email protected] Associate Editor Anna Szuba-Boroń e-ISSN 2380-0550 Office ul. Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1C; ISSN 1898-5238 30-705 Kraków (Poland) e-mail: [email protected] European Polygraph offers open access to all www.polygraph.pl its issues: Language Editor Martin Cahn http://www.polygraph.pl https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ep Statistics Editor Tadeusz Stanisz The original of European Polygraph Cover design Joanna Sroka, Oleg Aleksejczuk is its electronic version. EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH Volume 13 • 2019 • Number 3 (49) UDO UNDEUTSCH* Contents 〓 Dear Readers ..............................................................................................117 The actual use of investigative Articlesphysiopsychological examinations in Germany 〓 Jan Widacki: A empts at Lie Detec on Based on Scien fi c Premises on the End of 19 Century and in the First Half of the 20 Century................121 〓 Tuvya Amsel: Plan ng the Seeds of Polygraph’s Prac ce. A Brief Historical review ..............................................................................141 Book review 〓 J.W.: Uskikov I.P., Tschernenko R.V., Komponienty formirovania voprosov sravnieniya. Sbornik spietsialnih voprosov, Kyiv 2019. [Components for phrasing control ques ons], in Russian; 102 pp. ...................................157 116 CONTENTS Report Discussions, polemics 〓 Marcin Gołaszewski: Report from the 54th Seminar of the American Polygraph Associa on .................................................................................161 〓 Certifi cate Impact Factor .....................................................................................167 〓 The Basic Information for Authors ...................................................................169 〓 Rules and regulations concerning publishing papers in European Polygraph .........................................................................................171 〓 Ordering Information .............................................................................................173 EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH Volume 13 • 2019 • Number 3 (49) UDO UNDEUTSCH* Dear Readers, the year 2020 will be the jubilee year marking the centennial of the fi rst practical use of polygraph. Although irregular instances of using instrumental lie detection for criminological purposes had occurred before, it was only the use of polygraph examinationsThe actual by John A.use Larson of to determine investigative the perpetrator of theft s in 1920 that initiatedphysiopsychological the regular practice of using the polygraph. examinations Th e Editorial Board of European Polygraph announces the year 2020 the year of John A.in Larson. Germany To commemorate that anniversary and the memory of John A. Larson, we announce a competition for an article devoted to the pioneer of polygraph research. Selected by the Editorial Board, the best article will be published in European Polygraph. Th e deadline for submissions is the end of February 2020. At the same time, following the idea of our author and regular columnist, Tuvya Amsel PhD, we turned to a group of persons of great merit in polygraph examinations, both academics and practitioners from all over the world, to answer two questions: 1. Suppose you were a polygraph examiner already in the early years of the profession, when the practice was evolving please, outline the foremost changes you have witnessed in the last 100 years. 2. Please, disregard technical instrumental development due to the fact that those were basically developed by out of polygraph professionals and were later harnessed to the polygraph needs. All the answers submitted by the end of January 2020, will be published in the following issue of European Polygraph. 118 DEAR READERS We would like to inform our readers and authors that beginning with 2020, European Polygraph will be published semi-annually. Th e annual volume of our journal will not change, only that instead of quarterly it will now be published semi-annually. We encourage all our readers to publish their works in European Polygraph and kindly ask members of the Editorial Board to promote our journal in their milieus and encourage publication of both experimental studies and descriptions of interesting practical cases. We also request reviews and bibliographic notes on books on polygraph examinations, and reports from conferences and symposia on the subject. European Polygraph belongs to all of us. Th e journal is indexed in several dozens of databases and carries an Impact Factor of 0.63. Professor Jan Widacki Editor-in-Chief of European Polygraph Articles EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH Volume 13 • 2019 • Number 3 (49) DOI: 10.2478/ep-2019-0009 UDO UNDEUTSCH* Jan Widacki* Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Kraków University, Kraków, Poland Attempts at Lie Detection Based onThe Scientifi actual c usePremises of investigative on the End of 19 Century andphysiopsychological in the First Half of the examinations 20 Century Попыткиin Germany выявление лжи на основе научных предпосылок в конце XIX – первой половине XX века Key words: history of lie detection, scientifi c basis of lie detection 1. The word associated test In 1892, in the psychological conference, Hugo Mü nsterberg expressed the belief that it is not a lie that is detected, but the emotions that accompany it (Burtt 1965). Th e Word Association Test proves that the reactions accompanying a lie consist not only of emotions but also a certain intellectual eff ort, necessary on behalf of the lying per- son. It goes without saying and is supported by Trovillo (Trovillo 1938/39) that the fi rst to have described the essence of a test using word associations was Francis Galton (1822–1911) in 1879 (Galton 1879). Later some other researchers, notably Wilhelm Wundt, Max Wertheimer, and Melanie Klein, but also Carl Jung, conducted experi- ments with the test and tried to use it to justify their theories and hypotheses (as ex- * [email protected] © year of fi rst publica on Author(s). This is an open access ar cle distributed under the Crea ve Commons A ribu on-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license h p://crea vecommons.Org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 122 JAN WIDACKI plained below). Th e assumptions of the word association test are as follows: there is someone suspected of having assaulted a woman in a park, snatching her handbag and terrorising her with a knife, and now denies it, claiming that he not only made no as- sault but moreover knows no circumstances of the event. A special list of clues that in- clude such words as “knife”, “park”, and “handbag” is draft ed for him. Th en the suspect is instructed that as the list will be read out to the suspect, who is supposed to answer immediately with the fi rst word that comes to mind on hearing it. Reading the cues one by one, the experimenters measure the time aft er which the subject uttered the word associated with the cue. In advanced laboratory experiments, both of the researcher and the subject spoke to the so-called sound key, in which the airwave produced by the utterance broke an electric circuit, and the sound key was connected to a timer. In more primitive cases, time was measured with a stopwatch. It was assumed that on hearing “the critical words” (in this case, “knife”, “park”, and “handbag”) the person who lies saying that he or she does not know the details of the event will take a longer time to build associations than in the case of the remaining cues. Th at extension of the reaction time is caused by the subject’s self-control, as they control themselves so as not to “spill” some information. Briefl y speaking, in case of the critical queues, a liar (deceptive per- son hiding information) is forced to a greater intellectual eff ort, which fi rstly extends the time of response in a way automatically, and secondly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Justice in a Brave New World?
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2020 Justice in a Brave New World? Jean R. Sternlight University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation Sternlight, Jean R., "Justice in a Brave New World?" (2020). Scholarly Works. 1306. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1306 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 APRIL 2020 NUMBER 1 Article Justice in a Brave New World? JEAN R. STERNLIGHT As science fiction has become reality, we should consider the implications of our new technologies for our system of justice. In addition to DNA, we are now regularly using cameras, geo-tracking, facial recognition software, brain scans, computers, and much more to discern and record our physical and mental surroundings. Existing technology and more we cannot yet imagine will increasingly take the place of often unreliable evidence, such as that provided by eyewitnesses. Yet, we have given far too little thought as to how these advances should impact our civil and criminal dispute resolution systems. Historically, many justice systems have emphasized the importance of finding the truth. Our new forms of technology will arguably help us discover the truth, and thereby potentially enhance justice. Upon reflection, however, it is not clear that our scientific innovations will necessarily yield greater truth, much less justice.
    [Show full text]
  • European Polygraph 2017 No 3
    EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED QUARTERLY Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University EUTOPEAN POLYGRAPH Journal o f Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of pol­ ygraph examinations. These include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysi­ ology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews published in European Polygraph solely reflect the experience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Their publication does not imply any form of endorsement on be­ half the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, often contradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergey Aleskovski (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) Genrikas Nedveckis (Vilnius, Lithuania) Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) Publisher Council Polona Selic (Ljubljana, Slovenia) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) Krakow University Igor Usikov (Kiev, Ukraine) Klemens Budzowski Jennifer M.C. Vendemia (Columbia, United States) Maria Kapiszewska Jan W idacki (Krakow, Poland) Zbigniew Maciqg Daniel T. Wilcox (Birmingham, United Kingdom) Jacek M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocular-Motor Methods for Detecting Deception: Effect of Countermeasures
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Monika Kupcová Ocular-Motor Methods for Detecting Deception: Effect of Countermeasures. Supervisor: prof. PhDr. Tomáš Urbánek, Ph.D. Consultant: John C. Kircher, Ph.D. 2017 I hereby declare that I wrote this thesis on my own. I have acknowledged all sources used and have cited these in the reference section. In Brno, 30.11.2017 ……………………………… Monika Kupcová ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank professor John C. Kircher who has been a wonderful mentor. I am beyond grateful for his immense knowledge and for his guidance through writing this thesis: encouraging my ideas, helping me with the software, guiding me through the data analysis, and much more. I have asked him countless questions and I cannot thank enough for every answer I have always been given. I would like to thank professor Tomáš Urbánek for his support of my ideas from the very beginning. The door to his office was always open whenever I ran into a trouble spot or had a question. I must express deep gratitude to my parents for providing me with unfailing support and continuous encouragement throughout my years of study and through the process of writing this thesis. This would not have been possible without them. Thank you. Last, but not least, I would like to thank all the participants that participated in the experiment and to all the undergraduate students who served as the secretary confederates in the experiment. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 I. THEORETICAL PART .............................................................................................. 7 Deception detection ....................................................................................................... 7 Lay people vs. professionals ................................................................................... 8 Application of deception detection ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rps Degree College Balana (Mahendergarh)-123029
    RPS DEGREE COLLEGE BALANA (MAHENDERGARH)-123029 Lab Manual Geography (B.A 3rd Semester) Department of Geography Content Sr. No. Name of the Experiment 1. Measurement of Temperature 2. Measurement of Rainfall 3. Measurement of Air Pressure 4. Measurement of Humidity 5. Representation of Temperature and Rainfall Line Graph Bar Graph Combine line And Bar Graph Polygraph 6. Isopleths Isopleths Map 7. Weather Map Weather Symbols 8. Chain and Tape Survey 1. Measurement of Temperature: A temperature is an objective comparative measurement of hot or cold. It is measured by a thermometer. Several scales and units exist for measuring temperature, the most common being Celsius (denoted °C; formerly called centigrade), Fahrenheit (denoted °F), and, especially in science, Kelvin(denoted K). Here a equation for three unit- 0 ْ C=32 ْ F=273K 2. Measurement of Rainfall: Rain is liquid water in the form of droplets that have condensed from atmospheric water vapor and then precipitated—that is, become heavy enough to fall under gravity. Rain is a major component of the water and is responsible for depositing most of the water on the Earth. It provides suitable conditions for many types of ecosystems, as well as water for hydroelectric power plants and crop irrigation. Three types of Rainfall Orographic Rainfall Convectional Rainfall Cyclonic Rainfall A rain gauge (also known as an udometer, pluviometer, or an ombrometer) is an instrument used by meteorologists and hydrologists to gather and measure the amount of liquid precipitation over a set period of time. Types of rain gauges include graduated cylinders, weighing gauges, tipping bucket gauges, and simple buried pit collectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in a Brave New World?
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2020 Justice in a Brave New World? Jean R. Sternlight Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Sternlight, Jean R., "Justice in a Brave New World?" (2020). Connecticut Law Review. 441. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/441 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 APRIL 2020 NUMBER 1 Article Justice in a Brave New World? JEAN R. STERNLIGHT As science fiction has become reality, we should consider the implications of our new technologies for our system of justice. In addition to DNA, we are now regularly using cameras, geo-tracking, facial recognition software, brain scans, computers, and much more to discern and record our physical and mental surroundings. Existing technology and more we cannot yet imagine will increasingly take the place of often unreliable evidence, such as that provided by eyewitnesses. Yet, we have given far too little thought as to how these advances should impact our civil and criminal dispute resolution systems. Historically, many justice systems have emphasized the importance of finding the truth. Our new forms of technology will arguably help us discover the truth, and thereby potentially enhance justice. Upon reflection, however, it is not clear that our scientific innovations will necessarily yield greater truth, much less justice. The products of our technology will inevitably be subject to human interpretation and argument, and justice has always been about far more than truth. This Article argues that we should focus on three critically important issues as we consider how to redesign our system of justice to accommodate our new technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From: Version: Accepted Version Publisher: SAGE Publications DOI
    Bunn, Geoffrey (2019) “Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?” The Lie Detector, The Love Machine and the Logic of Fantasy. History of the Human Sciences, 32 (5). pp. 135-163. ISSN 0952-6951 Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/623385/ Version: Accepted Version Publisher: SAGE Publications DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119867022 Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk “Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?” The Lie Detector, The Love Machine and the Logic of Fantasy Geoffrey C. Bunn1 Abstract One of the consequences of the public outcry over the 1929 St Valentine’s Day massacre was the establishment of a Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory at Northwestern University. The photogenic “Lie Detector Man”, Leonarde Keeler, was the Laboratory’s poster boy and his instrument the jewel in the crown of forensic science. The press often depicted Keeler gazing at a female suspect attached to his “sweat box”; a galvanometer electrode in her hand, a sphygmomanometer cuff on her arm and a rubber pneumograph tube strapped across her breasts. Keeler’s fascination with the deceptive charms of the female body was one he shared with his fellow lie detector pioneers, all of whom met their wives – and in William Marston’s case his mistress too – through their engagement with the instrument. Marston employed his own “Love Meter”, as the press dubbed it, to prove that “brunettes react far more violently to amatory stimuli than blondes”. In this paper I draw on the psychoanalytic concepts of fantasy and pleasure to argue that the female body played a pivotal role in establishing the lie detector’s reputation as an infallible and benign mechanical technology of truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconventional Methods for Selecting Human Resources- Polygraph and Honesty (Integrity) Tests
    UDC 005.953.2:159.9.072 Professional paper Maja PANOVA∗) Kiril POSTOLOV∗∗) UNCONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR SELECTING HUMAN RESOURCES- POLYGRAPH AND HONESTY (INTEGRITY) TESTS Abstract A polygraph (a lie detector) and honesty (integrity) tests are unconventional methods for selecting human resources in companies. They are used for testing employees’ honesty and integrity by detecting the veracity of their answers, as well as for detecting people who are predisposed to immoral behavior. Since the companies have confronted with loss and waste made by the employers with immoral behavior, they are using more and more honesty and integrity tests to detect the employers who act immorally and irresponsibly. Some of the companies don’t have trust in the traditional standardized tests for selecting human resources and therefore they’ve decided for using unconventional methods for selecting human resources. The polygraph has been still used in America besides it has restricted use by law. Nowadays, the honesty (integrity) tests have been used intensively because of the criticism of the polygraph and its restricted use. Key words: polygraph, honesty (integrity) tests, immoral behavior JEL classification: M54 ∗) M.Sc., Ss. Cyril & Methodius University, Republic of Macedonia, e-mail: [email protected] ∗∗) PhD, “University Ss. Cyril and Methodius University-Skopje”, e-mail: [email protected] Economic Development No.3/2015 p.(367-378) Introduction Testing people’ honesty and integrity is done with polygraph (lie detector) and written tests in order to assess whether candidates behave immorally. The polygraph is a lie detector and it verifies the truthfulness of candidates’ statements. The polygraph tests are used as a selective method to test the truthfulness of applicant’s statements and for a choice of new employees in the government, banks, treasury, jewelry’s and workplaces which are attractive to potential robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Badań Poligraficznych
    Jan W idacki HISTORIA BADAŃ POLIGRAFICZNYCH Jan Widacki HISTORIA BADAŃ POLIGRAFICZNYCH Kraków 2017 Rada Wydawnicza Krakowskiej Akademii im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego: Klemens Budzowski, Maria Kapiszewska, Zbigniew Maciąg, Jacek M. Majchrowski Recenzja: dr hab. Marek Leśniak Publikacja częściowo dofinansowana ze środków przeznaczonych na działalność statutową Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Stosunków Międzynarodowych (numer projektu WPAiSM/DS/12/2015-KON) ISBN 978-83-65208-74-3 Copyright© by Jan Widacki Kraków 2017 Żadna część tej publikacji nie może być powielana ani magazynowana w sposób umożliwiający ponowne wykorzystanie, ani też rozpowszechniana w jakiejkolwiek formie za pomocą środków elektronicznych, mechanicznych, kopiujących, nagrywających i innych, bez uprzedniej pisemnej zgody właściciela praw autorskich Spis treści W stęp............................................................................................................................13 Rozdział I. Zagadnienia wstępne......................................................................... 17 1.1. Kłamstwo.............................................................................................................17 1.2. Pierwsze próby rozpoznawania kłam stw a.....................................................21 1.3. Pierwsze oceny zachowania i mimiki osoby przesłuchiwanej oraz uczestniczącej w przeszukaniu................................................................ 24 Rozdział II. Pierwsze naukowe podstawy detekcji kłamstwa.......................27 2.1. Psychologia
    [Show full text]
  • El Estudio De Las Mentiras Verdaderas
    COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EL ESTUDIO DE LAS MENTIRAS VERDADERAS Reseña sobre abusos con el polígrafo BENJAMÍN DOMÍNGUEZ TREJO Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, y CNDH MÉXICO, 2004 Primera edición: noviembre, 2004 ISBN: 970-644-404-1 © Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos Periférico Sur 3469, esquina Luis Cabrera, Col. San Jerónimo Lídice, C. P. 10200, México, D. F. Diseño de portada: Flavio López Alcocer Impreso en México CONTENIDO PRÓLOGO ...................................................................... 7 PRESENTACIÓN ............................................................... 11 INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................... 19 HISTORIA MÍNIMA DE LA SIMULACIÓN ENTRE LOS HUMANOS ............................................................ 27 ¿POR QUÉ SE DESARROLLÓ EL POLÍGRAFO SÓLO EN NORTEAMÉRICA .................................................... 31 ESTUDIOS PIONEROS SOBRE LAS EMOCIONES ...................... 35 GÉNERO Y POLÍGRAFO..................................................... 43 EL ESTUDIO DE LOS CRIMINALES AUTÉNTICOS .................... 47 EL USO GENERALIZADO DEL POLÍGRAFO ............................ 55 PROCEDIMIENTOS DEL POLÍGRAFO .................................... 59 LA EROSIÓN DE LA CONFIANZA MUTUA ............................. 67 [5] LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICO-PSICOLÓGICA Y LA DEFENSA DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES ............................. 71 ESTUDIOS DE LABORATORIO SOBRE LA DETECCIÓN DE LA SIMULACIÓN ..................................................... 89
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Innovation in Credibility Assessment
    Technological Innovation in Credibility Assessment Todd Mickelsen CEO May 25, 2021 Copyright © Converus Inc. 2021 The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, both a medical student at the University of California at Berkeley and a police officer of the Berkeley Police Department in Berkeley, California, invents the first modern-day polygraph. Origin of the Name Polygraph 3 Machine in which multiple ("poly") signals from sensors attached to a subject are recorded on a rolled sheet of moving paper ("graph"). Polygraph Adopted by the FBI in 1939 4 u Sensors § Respiration § Pulse § Blood pressure § Skin conductance The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology University of Utah scientists and internationally renowned polygraph experts, Dr. John C. Kircher and Dr. David C. Raskin, computerize the polygraph. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, both a medical student at the University of California at Berkeley and a police officer of the Berkeley Police Department in Berkeley, California, invents the first modern-day polygraph. Invention of the Computerized Polygraph 6 u More than a move from an analog device to a computer u New, more effective test protocols and methods were developed u Dr. Kircher created the first algorithm for scoring a polygraph Pr(Deceptive) = 1 / ( 1 + exp( b0 + b1X1 + b2X2 + … + bkXk )) The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology University of Utah scientists and internationally renowned polygraph experts, Dr. John C. Kircher and Dr. David C. Raskin, computerize the polygraph. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C.
    [Show full text]
  • CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: Cybercrime and Forensic Invest
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE CODE: CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: Cybercrime and Forensic Investigation NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE CODE: CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: CYBERCRIME AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION CYBERCRIME AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION Course Writer/Developer Dr Macpherson Uchenna Nnam, AEFUNAI Course Coordinator Prof. Sam Obadiah Smah CSS, FSS NOUN. Course Editor Dr Ayokunle Olumuyiwa Omobowale Sociology Department University of Ibadan Nigeria Programme Leader Dr. Dickson Ogbonnaya Igwe CSS, FSS NOUN MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL BACKGROUND TO CYBERSPACE AND CYBERCRIME Unit 1: Understanding the Concepts of Cyberspace and Cybercrime Unit 2: Types/Forms of Cybercrime Unit 3: Effects of Cybercrime Unit 4: Prevention and Control of Cybercrime Unit 5: Obstacles to the Prevention and Control of Cybercrime MODULE 2: THEORIES OF CYBERCRIME AND CYBER CRIMINOLOGY Unit 1: Space Transition Theory Unit 2: Rational Choice Theory Unit 3: Routine Activities Theory Unit 4: Social Learning Theory Unit 5: Fraud Triangle Theory MODULE 3: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL BACKGROUND TO FORENSIC SCIENCE/INVESTIGATION Unit 1: Definition and Origin of Forensic Science/Investigation Unit 2: Scope/Units/Branches of Forensic Science/Investigation Unit 3: Role of Forensic Investigation and Evidence in the Criminal Justice System Unit 4: Basic Features of Cybersecurity Strategies Unit 5: Challenges of Forensic Investigation and Prosecution of Cybercrimes MODULE 4: FORENSIC SCIENCE/INVESTIGATION
    [Show full text]
  • European Polygraph 2020, Volume 14, Number 1 (51)
    EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY 2020 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 (51) ANDRZEJ FRYCZ MODRZEWSKI KRAKOW UNIVERSITY EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY 2020 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 (51) ANDRZEJ FRYCZ MODRZEWSKI KRAKOW UNIVERSITY EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY Journal of Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal de- voted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of polygraph examinations. Th ese include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysiology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews pub- lished in European Polygraph solely refl ect the expe- rience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Th eir publication does not imply any form of endorsement on behalf the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, oft en con- tradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergei Aleskovskyi (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Publisher Council Tuvya T. Amsel (Tel Aviv, Israel) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Avital Ginton (Tel Aviv, Israel) Krakow University Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Klemens Budzowski Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Maria Kapiszewska Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Zbigniew Maciąg Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) Jacek M. Majchrowski James Matte (Williamsville, USA) Alexandr B. Pielenicyn (Moscow, Russia) Office Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) ul. Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1C; David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) 30-705 Kraków (Poland) Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) e-mail: [email protected] Gintaras Švedas (Vilnius, Lithuania) www.polygraph.pl Igor Usikov (Kyiv, Ukraine) Jennifer M.C. Vendemia (Columbia, United States) Copyright© by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Jan Widacki (Krakow, Poland) Krakow University Daniel T.
    [Show full text]