DOCSLIB.ORG

Technological Innovation in Credibility Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technological Innovation in Credibility Assessment Technological Innovation in Credibility Assessment Todd Mickelsen CEO May 25, 2021 Copyright © Converus Inc. 2021 The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, both a medical student at the University of California at Berkeley and a police officer of the Berkeley Police Department in Berkeley, California, invents the first modern-day polygraph. Origin of the Name Polygraph 3 Machine in which multiple ("poly") signals from sensors attached to a subject are recorded on a rolled sheet of moving paper ("graph"). Polygraph Adopted by the FBI in 1939 4 u Sensors § Respiration § Pulse § Blood pressure § Skin conductance The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology University of Utah scientists and internationally renowned polygraph experts, Dr. John C. Kircher and Dr. David C. Raskin, computerize the polygraph. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, both a medical student at the University of California at Berkeley and a police officer of the Berkeley Police Department in Berkeley, California, invents the first modern-day polygraph. Invention of the Computerized Polygraph 6 u More than a move from an analog device to a computer u New, more effective test protocols and methods were developed u Dr. Kircher created the first algorithm for scoring a polygraph Pr(Deceptive) = 1 / ( 1 + exp( b0 + b1X1 + b2X2 + … + bkXk )) The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology University of Utah scientists and internationally renowned polygraph experts, Dr. John C. Kircher and Dr. David C. Raskin, computerize the polygraph. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C. Kircher, Doug both a medical student Hacker and other at the University of scientists discover that California at Berkeley cognition-based and a police officer of detection of deception is the Berkeley Police possible through Department in Berkeley, involuntary changes in California, invents the the eyes with greater first modern-day than 80% accuracy. polygraph. The Ocular-Motor Deception Test (ODT) 8 Dr. John Kircher Dr. Doug Hacker Dr. Dan Woltz Dr. Anne Cook Dr. David Raskin u Sought a fast, automated, non-contact and accurate way to “screen” subjects u World-renowned, widely published with 9 peer-reviewed studies on ODT The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology Converus announces University of Utah the worldwide release scientists and of EyeDetect — the internationally world’s first ocular- renowned polygraph motor lie detection test experts, Dr. John C. that assesses credibility Kircher and Dr. David C. by measuring Raskin, computerize the involuntary eye polygraph. behavior. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C. Kircher, Doug both a medical student Hacker and other at the University of scientists discover that California at Berkeley cognition-based and a police officer of detection of deception is the Berkeley Police possible through Department in Berkeley, involuntary changes in California, invents the the eyes with greater first modern-day than 80% accuracy. polygraph. 10 86 to 88% accurate Non-Contact 15 to 30-minute test Results < 5 minutes Automated & Consistent Secure & Incorruptible u 1000’s of Tests in 50+ languages Portable u 600+ Customers in 50 Countries u Customers running 1000’s monthly Cost-effective Trained in 4 hours The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology Converus announces University of Utah the worldwide release scientists and of EyeDetect — the internationally world’s first ocular- renowned polygraph motor lie detection test experts, Dr. John C. that assesses credibility Kircher and Dr. David C. by measuring Raskin, computerize the involuntary eye polygraph. behavior. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C. Kircher, Doug Converus releases the both a medical student Hacker and other EyeDetect Multi-issue at the University of scientists discover that Comparison Test (MCT) California at Berkeley cognition-based Protocol. MCT scores up and a police officer of detection of deception is to four relevant issues in the Berkeley Police possible through a single test and also Department in Berkeley, involuntary changes in accurately identifies the California, invents the the eyes with greater issue that caused the first modern-day than 80% accuracy. candidate to fail the polygraph. test. Multi-Issue Comparison Test (MCT) 12 u R1: Have you used illegal drugs in the past 2 years? u R2: Have you committed a serious crime act, as an adult? u R3: Do you have unreported, work-related discipline? u R4: Do you have ties to foreign terrorists? “In my 42 years of working with deception detection technologies, the discovery of predictors that accurately pinpoint which questions were answered deceptively is one of the most significant experiences in my career.” Dr. John C. Kircher The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology Converus releases an Converus announces University of Utah audio-only MCT test for the worldwide release scientists and those that cannot read. of EyeDetect — the internationally world’s first ocular- renowned polygraph Converus releases motor lie detection test experts, Dr. John C. EyeDetect+ 1.0, which that assesses credibility Kircher and Dr. David C. measures ocular data as by measuring Raskin, computerize the well as polygraph-like involuntary eye polygraph. physiological data. behavior. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C. Kircher, Doug Converus releases the both a medical student Hacker and other EyeDetect Multi-issue at the University of scientists discover that Comparison Test (MCT) California at Berkeley cognition-based Protocol. MCT scores up and a police officer of detection of deception is to four relevant issues in the Berkeley Police possible through a single test and also Department in Berkeley, involuntary changes in accurately identifies the California, invents the the eyes with greater issue that caused the first modern-day than 80% accuracy. candidate to fail the polygraph. test. Audio Multi-Issue Comparison Test (AMCT) 14 u Example T/F Statements § As to the money reported missing, I took it. § Regarding the theft of the vehicle, I am responsible. 15 Physio Tracker measures u Electrodermal Activity (EDA) u Cardiovascular Activity u PPG (photoelectric plethysmograph) u Blood volume pulse (BVP) u Heart rate (BPM) u Respiration derived from PPG 16 An approved lie detector is an “…instrument that records continuously, visually, permanently, and simultaneously changes in cardiovascular, respiratory and electrodermal patterns as minimum instrumentation standards and is used to render a diagnostic opinion as to the honesty or dishonesty of an individual.” Law Defines Lie Detector as Polygraph Converus Vision 17 Be the leading technology provider of credibility assessment solutions The 100-Year Evolution of Credibility Assessment Technology Converus releases an Converus announces University of Utah audio-only MCT test for the worldwide release scientists and those that cannot read. of EyeDetect — the internationally world’s first ocular- renowned polygraph Converus releases motor lie detection test experts, Dr. John C. EyeDetect+ 1.0, which that assesses credibility Kircher and Dr. David C. measures ocular data as by measuring Raskin, computerize the well as polygraph-like involuntary eye polygraph. physiological data. behavior. 1991 2014 2020 1921 2003 2019 2021 John Augustus Larson, John C. Kircher, Doug Converus releases the 100 years after the both a medical student Hacker and other EyeDetect Multi-issue invention of the first at the University of scientists discover that Comparison Test (MCT) modern-day California at Berkeley cognition-based Protocol. MCT scores up polygraph, Converus and a police officer of detection of deception is to four relevant issues in announces the the Berkeley Police possible through a single test and also release of EyeDetect+ Department in Berkeley, involuntary changes in accurately identifies the 2.0, the world’s first California, invents the the eyes with greater issue that caused the fully automated first modern-day than 80% accuracy. candidate to fail the polygraph. polygraph. test. 19 Version 2.0 The World’s First Automated Polygraph u Automated u Accurate u Less Intrusive 20 Video What’s Unique and 21 New in V2.0? u Automated Test Process u Optimized Test Protocol u Accuracy up to 90% u No Blood Pressure Cuff u Advanced Activity Pad u EyeDetect+ Manager 22 Automated Test Process Automated Test Process 23 u Administered by EyeDetect Station V3/V4 with digital voice, managed by proctor u The data is analyzed and scored by the EyeDetect Station u Trained polygraph examiners perform pre and post test interviews if needed u Trained examiners create, modify and load tests onto the EyeDetect Station + 24 Optimized Test Protocol Hybrid MCT Protocol (HMCT) 25 u Combines polygraph + ocular-motor measures in an optimal, patented*way Test Characteristics Phase 1 Phase 2 Optimization Automated polygraph Automated Ocular-motor Test Psychological mechanism Emotion Cognition Stimuli Yes/No questions True/False statements Stimulus modality Auditory + Visual Visual Interstimulus interval 22 seconds 2-4 seconds Number of stimuli 11 x 3 48 x 2 Instruction No requirement to answer Required to answer quickly and quickly accurately * U.S. Patent Pending for protocol to “Detect Deception Using Oculomotor, Cardiovascular, Respiratory and Electrodermal Measures”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Justice in a Brave New World?
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2020 Justice in a Brave New World? Jean R. Sternlight University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the Evidence Commons Recommended Citation Sternlight, Jean R., "Justice in a Brave New World?" (2020). Scholarly Works. 1306. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/1306 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 APRIL 2020 NUMBER 1 Article Justice in a Brave New World? JEAN R. STERNLIGHT As science fiction has become reality, we should consider the implications of our new technologies for our system of justice. In addition to DNA, we are now regularly using cameras, geo-tracking, facial recognition software, brain scans, computers, and much more to discern and record our physical and mental surroundings. Existing technology and more we cannot yet imagine will increasingly take the place of often unreliable evidence, such as that provided by eyewitnesses. Yet, we have given far too little thought as to how these advances should impact our civil and criminal dispute resolution systems. Historically, many justice systems have emphasized the importance of finding the truth. Our new forms of technology will arguably help us discover the truth, and thereby potentially enhance justice. Upon reflection, however, it is not clear that our scientific innovations will necessarily yield greater truth, much less justice.
    [Show full text]
  • European Polygraph 2017 No 3
    EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED QUARTERLY Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University EUTOPEAN POLYGRAPH Journal o f Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of pol­ ygraph examinations. These include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysi­ ology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews published in European Polygraph solely reflect the experience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Their publication does not imply any form of endorsement on be­ half the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, often contradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergey Aleskovski (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) Genrikas Nedveckis (Vilnius, Lithuania) Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) Publisher Council Polona Selic (Ljubljana, Slovenia) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) Krakow University Igor Usikov (Kiev, Ukraine) Klemens Budzowski Jennifer M.C. Vendemia (Columbia, United States) Maria Kapiszewska Jan W idacki (Krakow, Poland) Zbigniew Maciqg Daniel T. Wilcox (Birmingham, United Kingdom) Jacek M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocular-Motor Methods for Detecting Deception: Effect of Countermeasures
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Monika Kupcová Ocular-Motor Methods for Detecting Deception: Effect of Countermeasures. Supervisor: prof. PhDr. Tomáš Urbánek, Ph.D. Consultant: John C. Kircher, Ph.D. 2017 I hereby declare that I wrote this thesis on my own. I have acknowledged all sources used and have cited these in the reference section. In Brno, 30.11.2017 ……………………………… Monika Kupcová ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank professor John C. Kircher who has been a wonderful mentor. I am beyond grateful for his immense knowledge and for his guidance through writing this thesis: encouraging my ideas, helping me with the software, guiding me through the data analysis, and much more. I have asked him countless questions and I cannot thank enough for every answer I have always been given. I would like to thank professor Tomáš Urbánek for his support of my ideas from the very beginning. The door to his office was always open whenever I ran into a trouble spot or had a question. I must express deep gratitude to my parents for providing me with unfailing support and continuous encouragement throughout my years of study and through the process of writing this thesis. This would not have been possible without them. Thank you. Last, but not least, I would like to thank all the participants that participated in the experiment and to all the undergraduate students who served as the secretary confederates in the experiment. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 I. THEORETICAL PART .............................................................................................. 7 Deception detection ....................................................................................................... 7 Lay people vs. professionals ................................................................................... 8 Application of deception detection ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rps Degree College Balana (Mahendergarh)-123029
    RPS DEGREE COLLEGE BALANA (MAHENDERGARH)-123029 Lab Manual Geography (B.A 3rd Semester) Department of Geography Content Sr. No. Name of the Experiment 1. Measurement of Temperature 2. Measurement of Rainfall 3. Measurement of Air Pressure 4. Measurement of Humidity 5. Representation of Temperature and Rainfall Line Graph Bar Graph Combine line And Bar Graph Polygraph 6. Isopleths Isopleths Map 7. Weather Map Weather Symbols 8. Chain and Tape Survey 1. Measurement of Temperature: A temperature is an objective comparative measurement of hot or cold. It is measured by a thermometer. Several scales and units exist for measuring temperature, the most common being Celsius (denoted °C; formerly called centigrade), Fahrenheit (denoted °F), and, especially in science, Kelvin(denoted K). Here a equation for three unit- 0 ْ C=32 ْ F=273K 2. Measurement of Rainfall: Rain is liquid water in the form of droplets that have condensed from atmospheric water vapor and then precipitated—that is, become heavy enough to fall under gravity. Rain is a major component of the water and is responsible for depositing most of the water on the Earth. It provides suitable conditions for many types of ecosystems, as well as water for hydroelectric power plants and crop irrigation. Three types of Rainfall Orographic Rainfall Convectional Rainfall Cyclonic Rainfall A rain gauge (also known as an udometer, pluviometer, or an ombrometer) is an instrument used by meteorologists and hydrologists to gather and measure the amount of liquid precipitation over a set period of time. Types of rain gauges include graduated cylinders, weighing gauges, tipping bucket gauges, and simple buried pit collectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice in a Brave New World?
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2020 Justice in a Brave New World? Jean R. Sternlight Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Sternlight, Jean R., "Justice in a Brave New World?" (2020). Connecticut Law Review. 441. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/441 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 APRIL 2020 NUMBER 1 Article Justice in a Brave New World? JEAN R. STERNLIGHT As science fiction has become reality, we should consider the implications of our new technologies for our system of justice. In addition to DNA, we are now regularly using cameras, geo-tracking, facial recognition software, brain scans, computers, and much more to discern and record our physical and mental surroundings. Existing technology and more we cannot yet imagine will increasingly take the place of often unreliable evidence, such as that provided by eyewitnesses. Yet, we have given far too little thought as to how these advances should impact our civil and criminal dispute resolution systems. Historically, many justice systems have emphasized the importance of finding the truth. Our new forms of technology will arguably help us discover the truth, and thereby potentially enhance justice. Upon reflection, however, it is not clear that our scientific innovations will necessarily yield greater truth, much less justice. The products of our technology will inevitably be subject to human interpretation and argument, and justice has always been about far more than truth. This Article argues that we should focus on three critically important issues as we consider how to redesign our system of justice to accommodate our new technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From: Version: Accepted Version Publisher: SAGE Publications DOI
    Bunn, Geoffrey (2019) “Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?” The Lie Detector, The Love Machine and the Logic of Fantasy. History of the Human Sciences, 32 (5). pp. 135-163. ISSN 0952-6951 Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/623385/ Version: Accepted Version Publisher: SAGE Publications DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119867022 Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk “Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?” The Lie Detector, The Love Machine and the Logic of Fantasy Geoffrey C. Bunn1 Abstract One of the consequences of the public outcry over the 1929 St Valentine’s Day massacre was the establishment of a Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory at Northwestern University. The photogenic “Lie Detector Man”, Leonarde Keeler, was the Laboratory’s poster boy and his instrument the jewel in the crown of forensic science. The press often depicted Keeler gazing at a female suspect attached to his “sweat box”; a galvanometer electrode in her hand, a sphygmomanometer cuff on her arm and a rubber pneumograph tube strapped across her breasts. Keeler’s fascination with the deceptive charms of the female body was one he shared with his fellow lie detector pioneers, all of whom met their wives – and in William Marston’s case his mistress too – through their engagement with the instrument. Marston employed his own “Love Meter”, as the press dubbed it, to prove that “brunettes react far more violently to amatory stimuli than blondes”. In this paper I draw on the psychoanalytic concepts of fantasy and pleasure to argue that the female body played a pivotal role in establishing the lie detector’s reputation as an infallible and benign mechanical technology of truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconventional Methods for Selecting Human Resources- Polygraph and Honesty (Integrity) Tests
    UDC 005.953.2:159.9.072 Professional paper Maja PANOVA∗) Kiril POSTOLOV∗∗) UNCONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR SELECTING HUMAN RESOURCES- POLYGRAPH AND HONESTY (INTEGRITY) TESTS Abstract A polygraph (a lie detector) and honesty (integrity) tests are unconventional methods for selecting human resources in companies. They are used for testing employees’ honesty and integrity by detecting the veracity of their answers, as well as for detecting people who are predisposed to immoral behavior. Since the companies have confronted with loss and waste made by the employers with immoral behavior, they are using more and more honesty and integrity tests to detect the employers who act immorally and irresponsibly. Some of the companies don’t have trust in the traditional standardized tests for selecting human resources and therefore they’ve decided for using unconventional methods for selecting human resources. The polygraph has been still used in America besides it has restricted use by law. Nowadays, the honesty (integrity) tests have been used intensively because of the criticism of the polygraph and its restricted use. Key words: polygraph, honesty (integrity) tests, immoral behavior JEL classification: M54 ∗) M.Sc., Ss. Cyril & Methodius University, Republic of Macedonia, e-mail: [email protected] ∗∗) PhD, “University Ss. Cyril and Methodius University-Skopje”, e-mail: [email protected] Economic Development No.3/2015 p.(367-378) Introduction Testing people’ honesty and integrity is done with polygraph (lie detector) and written tests in order to assess whether candidates behave immorally. The polygraph is a lie detector and it verifies the truthfulness of candidates’ statements. The polygraph tests are used as a selective method to test the truthfulness of applicant’s statements and for a choice of new employees in the government, banks, treasury, jewelry’s and workplaces which are attractive to potential robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Badań Poligraficznych
    Jan W idacki HISTORIA BADAŃ POLIGRAFICZNYCH Jan Widacki HISTORIA BADAŃ POLIGRAFICZNYCH Kraków 2017 Rada Wydawnicza Krakowskiej Akademii im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego: Klemens Budzowski, Maria Kapiszewska, Zbigniew Maciąg, Jacek M. Majchrowski Recenzja: dr hab. Marek Leśniak Publikacja częściowo dofinansowana ze środków przeznaczonych na działalność statutową Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Stosunków Międzynarodowych (numer projektu WPAiSM/DS/12/2015-KON) ISBN 978-83-65208-74-3 Copyright© by Jan Widacki Kraków 2017 Żadna część tej publikacji nie może być powielana ani magazynowana w sposób umożliwiający ponowne wykorzystanie, ani też rozpowszechniana w jakiejkolwiek formie za pomocą środków elektronicznych, mechanicznych, kopiujących, nagrywających i innych, bez uprzedniej pisemnej zgody właściciela praw autorskich Spis treści W stęp............................................................................................................................13 Rozdział I. Zagadnienia wstępne......................................................................... 17 1.1. Kłamstwo.............................................................................................................17 1.2. Pierwsze próby rozpoznawania kłam stw a.....................................................21 1.3. Pierwsze oceny zachowania i mimiki osoby przesłuchiwanej oraz uczestniczącej w przeszukaniu................................................................ 24 Rozdział II. Pierwsze naukowe podstawy detekcji kłamstwa.......................27 2.1. Psychologia
    [Show full text]
  • European Polygraph 2019, Volume 13, Number 3 (49)
    European Polygraph PUBLISHED QUARTERLY Volume 13 2019 Number 3 (49) Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph Journal of Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of pol- ygraph examinations. These include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysi- ology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews published in European Polygraph solely reflect the experience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Their publication does not imply any form of endorsement on be- half the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, often contradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergei Aleskovskyi (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Tuvya T. Amsel (Tel Aviv, Israel) Avital Ginton (Tel Aviv, Israel) Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Publisher Council Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski James Matte (Williamsville, USA) Krakow University Alexandr B. Pielenicyn (Moscow, Russia) Klemens Budzowski Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) Maria Kapiszewska David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) Zbigniew Maciąg Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) Jacek M. Majchrowski Gintaras Švedas (Vilnius, Lithuania) Igor Usikov
    [Show full text]
  • El Estudio De Las Mentiras Verdaderas
    COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EL ESTUDIO DE LAS MENTIRAS VERDADERAS Reseña sobre abusos con el polígrafo BENJAMÍN DOMÍNGUEZ TREJO Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, y CNDH MÉXICO, 2004 Primera edición: noviembre, 2004 ISBN: 970-644-404-1 © Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos Periférico Sur 3469, esquina Luis Cabrera, Col. San Jerónimo Lídice, C. P. 10200, México, D. F. Diseño de portada: Flavio López Alcocer Impreso en México CONTENIDO PRÓLOGO ...................................................................... 7 PRESENTACIÓN ............................................................... 11 INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................... 19 HISTORIA MÍNIMA DE LA SIMULACIÓN ENTRE LOS HUMANOS ............................................................ 27 ¿POR QUÉ SE DESARROLLÓ EL POLÍGRAFO SÓLO EN NORTEAMÉRICA .................................................... 31 ESTUDIOS PIONEROS SOBRE LAS EMOCIONES ...................... 35 GÉNERO Y POLÍGRAFO..................................................... 43 EL ESTUDIO DE LOS CRIMINALES AUTÉNTICOS .................... 47 EL USO GENERALIZADO DEL POLÍGRAFO ............................ 55 PROCEDIMIENTOS DEL POLÍGRAFO .................................... 59 LA EROSIÓN DE LA CONFIANZA MUTUA ............................. 67 [5] LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICO-PSICOLÓGICA Y LA DEFENSA DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES ............................. 71 ESTUDIOS DE LABORATORIO SOBRE LA DETECCIÓN DE LA SIMULACIÓN ..................................................... 89
    [Show full text]
  • CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: Cybercrime and Forensic Invest
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE CODE: CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: Cybercrime and Forensic Investigation NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE CODE: CSS 810 COURSE TITLE: CYBERCRIME AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION CYBERCRIME AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION Course Writer/Developer Dr Macpherson Uchenna Nnam, AEFUNAI Course Coordinator Prof. Sam Obadiah Smah CSS, FSS NOUN. Course Editor Dr Ayokunle Olumuyiwa Omobowale Sociology Department University of Ibadan Nigeria Programme Leader Dr. Dickson Ogbonnaya Igwe CSS, FSS NOUN MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL BACKGROUND TO CYBERSPACE AND CYBERCRIME Unit 1: Understanding the Concepts of Cyberspace and Cybercrime Unit 2: Types/Forms of Cybercrime Unit 3: Effects of Cybercrime Unit 4: Prevention and Control of Cybercrime Unit 5: Obstacles to the Prevention and Control of Cybercrime MODULE 2: THEORIES OF CYBERCRIME AND CYBER CRIMINOLOGY Unit 1: Space Transition Theory Unit 2: Rational Choice Theory Unit 3: Routine Activities Theory Unit 4: Social Learning Theory Unit 5: Fraud Triangle Theory MODULE 3: INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL BACKGROUND TO FORENSIC SCIENCE/INVESTIGATION Unit 1: Definition and Origin of Forensic Science/Investigation Unit 2: Scope/Units/Branches of Forensic Science/Investigation Unit 3: Role of Forensic Investigation and Evidence in the Criminal Justice System Unit 4: Basic Features of Cybersecurity Strategies Unit 5: Challenges of Forensic Investigation and Prosecution of Cybercrimes MODULE 4: FORENSIC SCIENCE/INVESTIGATION
    [Show full text]
  • European Polygraph 2020, Volume 14, Number 1 (51)
    EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY 2020 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 (51) ANDRZEJ FRYCZ MODRZEWSKI KRAKOW UNIVERSITY EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY 2020 VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 (51) ANDRZEJ FRYCZ MODRZEWSKI KRAKOW UNIVERSITY EUROPEAN POLYGRAPH PUBLISHED SEMI-ANNUALLY Journal of Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University European Polygraph is an international journal de- voted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries, and book reviews on the subject of polygraph examinations. Th ese include jurisprudence, forensic sciences, psychology, forensic psychology, psychophysiology, psychopathology, and other aspects of polygraph examinations. Opinions expressed in articles and book reviews pub- lished in European Polygraph solely refl ect the expe- rience and expertise of their respective Authors and Reviewers. Th eir publication does not imply any form of endorsement on behalf the Editors and Publishers who provide space for the presentation of, oft en con- tradictory, views and discussion of positions. Editorial Board Sergei Aleskovskyi (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Publisher Council Tuvya T. Amsel (Tel Aviv, Israel) of the Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Avital Ginton (Tel Aviv, Israel) Krakow University Don Grubin (Newcastle, United Kingdom) Klemens Budzowski Charles R. Honts (Boise, United States) Maria Kapiszewska Frank S. Horvath (East Lansing, United States) Zbigniew Maciąg Donald Krapohl (Fort Jackson, United States) Jacek M. Majchrowski James Matte (Williamsville, USA) Alexandr B. Pielenicyn (Moscow, Russia) Office Jerzy Pobocha (Szczecin, Poland) ul. Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1C; David C. Raskin (Homer AK, USA) 30-705 Kraków (Poland) Tuvia Shurany (Jerusalem, Israel) e-mail: [email protected] Gintaras Švedas (Vilnius, Lithuania) www.polygraph.pl Igor Usikov (Kyiv, Ukraine) Jennifer M.C. Vendemia (Columbia, United States) Copyright© by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Jan Widacki (Krakow, Poland) Krakow University Daniel T.
    [Show full text]