<<

THE . , [Book . duration the most permanent. It was the duty of an expounder of our to lay this before the student in its true and genuine light: it is the duty of every good Englishman to understand, to revere, to defend it. (11)

CHAPTER IV. OF THE 'S ROYAL FAMILY. The first and most considerable branch of the king's royal family, regarded by the laws of England, is the queen. The queen of England is either queen , , or . The queen regent, regnant, or sovereign, is she who holds the in her own right; as the first (and perhaps the second) Queen Mary, Queen Elizabeth, and Queen Anne; and such a one has the same powers, prerogatives, rights, digni- ties, and duties, as if she had been a king. This was observed in the entrance of the last chapter, and is expressly declared by statute 1 Mar. I, st. 3, c. 1. But the queen consort is the of the reigning king; and she, by virtue of her marriage, is participant of divers prerogatives above other women. (a) And first, she is a public person, exempt and distinct from the king: and not, like other married women, so closely connected as to have lost all legal or separate existence so long as the marriage continues. For the queen is of (a) Finch. L. 86.

(11) By the constitution of the United States the president, who is the federal executive, is chosen by electors, who are themselves chosen by the people of the several states to perform that duty. Each state appoints in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a num- ber of 6lectors equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in congress: Const. art. 2, § 1; and those electors meet in the respective states and vote by ballot for president and vice-president, one of the persons voted for, at least, not being an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; the result of which voting is transmitted to the seat of government, and canvassed in joint convention of the two houses of congress. If no one person have a majority of all the votes cast for president, the house of representatives proceeds immediately to choose a president by ballot, from the persons, not exceeding three, having the highest number of votes; but in this election they vote by states, the representation of each state being entitled to one vote, and a majority of all the states being necessary to a choice. If no person has a majority of all the votes cast for vice-presi- dent, the senate, from the two highest numbers on the list, chooses a vice-president; a majority vote of a quorum of two-thirds of all the senators being requisite to an election. Const. 12th amendment. No person is eligible to either of these offices except a natural born citizen, or one who was a citizen at the time of the adoption of the constitution, and who has attained the age of thirty-five years. Const. art. 2, § 1. In case of the removal of the president from office or of his death, resignation or inability to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the same devolve on the vice-president. Const. art. 2, 1. And in case of vacancy in the office of vice-president, then such powers and duties devolve upon the president pro tern. of the senate, or, if there be no such officer, then upon the speaker of the house of representatives for the time being. 1 Stat. at Large, 239. And if the house of representatives shall not choose a president when the right devolves upon them, by the fourth day of March next following, the vice-president becomes acting president, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the president. Const. 12th amendment. The president and vice-president, like all other civil officers, are subject to be removed from office, on impeachment for and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Const. art. 2, § 4. By the constitution, as originally adopte(, the electors chosen in the states cast their votes for two persons, without designating which was their choice for president and which for vice- president, and the persons having the highest number, if a majority of all, became president, and the one having the next highest number, if a majority, became vice-president; but, when party lines came to be distinctly drawn, so that the candidates of one party, in the absence of intrigue or bad faith, were likely always to receive the same number of votes, the purpose of this scheme of election was wholly defeated, and the constitution, after the exciting election of Mr. Jefferson by the house of representatives, over Mr. Burr, who had been candidate before the people for the second ppsition only, was changed as above shown. 140 Chap. 4.] OF THE QUEEN REGENT. ability to purchase lands, and to convey them, to make leases, to grant copy- holds, and do other acts of ownership, without the concurrence of her ; which no other married can do: (b) a privilege as old as the Saxon era.(c) She is also capable of taking a grant from the king, which no other wife is from her husband; and in this particular she agrees with the Augusta, or pii.ssma regina conjux divi imperatoris of the Roman laws; who according to Justinian, (d) was equally *capable of making a grant to, and receiv- ing one from, the . The queen of England hath separate courts [*21 and offices distinct from the king's, not only in matters of ceremony, but even of ; and her attorney and solicitor general are entitled to a place within the bar of his 's courts, together with the king's counsel.(e) She may like- wise sue and be sued alone, without joining her husband. She may also have a separate property in goods, as well as lands, and has a right to dispose of them by will. In short, she is in all legal proceedings looked upon as a feme sole, and not as a feme covert; as a single, not as a married woman, (f) For which the reason given by Edward Coke is this: because the wisdom of the common law would not have the king, (whose continual care and study is for the public, and circa ardua regni,) to be troubled and disquieted on account of his wife's domestic affairs; and therefore it vests in the queen a power of transacting her own concerns, without the intervention of the king, as if she was an unmarried woman. The queen. hath also many exemptions and minute prerogatives. For instance: she pays no toll; (g) nor is she liable to amercement in any court.(h) But in general, unless where the law has expressly declared her exempted, she is upon the same footing with other subjects; being to all intents and purposes, the king' subject, and not his equal: in like manner as, in the imperial law, "Augusta legibus soluta non est."(i) The queen hath also some pecuniary advantages, which form her a distinct revenue: as in the first place, she is entitled to an ancient perquisite called queen-gold, aurum reginw, which is a royal revenue, belonging to every queen consort during her marriage with the king, and due from every person who hath made a voluntary offering or fine to the king, amounting to ten marks or upwards, for and in consideration of any privileges, grants, licences, pardons, or *other matter of royal favour conferred upon him by the king: and it r*220] is due in the proportion of one tenth part more, over and above the entire L*220 offering or fine made to the king; and becomes an actual debt of record to the queen's majesty by the mere recording of the fine. (k) (1) As, if an hundred marks of silver. be given to the king for liberty to take in mortmain, or to have a fair, market, park, chase, or free-warren: there the queen is entitled to ten marks in silver, or (what was formerly an equivalent denomination) to one mark in gold, by the name of queen-gold, or aurum regince. (1) But no such payment is due for any aids or subsidies granted to the king in parliament or convocation; nor for fines imposed by courts on offenders, against their will; nor for voluntary presents to the king, without any consideration moving from him to the subject; nor for any sale or contract whereby the present revenues or possessions of the crown are granted away or diminished. (m) The original revenue of our ancient queens, before and soon after the con- quest, seems to have consisted in certain reservations or rents out of the demesne lands of the crown, which were expressly appropriated to her majesty, distinct from the king. It is frequent, in domesday book, after specifying the rent (b)4 Rep. 23. (e) Seld. Jan.Angl. 1, 42. The instance meant, loc.citat, Is where Ethelswith, wife to Burghred, king of the Mercians, granted a patent to Cathwals. (d) Cod. 5,16, 26. (e) Seld. tit. hon. 1 6, 7. (F) Finch. L. 86. Co. Litt. 133. (q)Co. Litt. 133. (h)Finch. L. 185. (1) 'f.1, 3,31. (k) -Pryn.Aur. reg. 2. () 12 Rep. Wi. 4 Inst. 358. (m)Ibid. Pryn. 6. Madox, ist. Exch. 242.

(1) [Lord Littleton enters at some length into this subject of fines to the king as one con- siderable source of the royal revenue in the early periods of our Anglo-Norman history, and cites fromMadox a vast number of instances, some indeed ludicrous, but all scandalous and tyrannical, in which fines were paid. Henry II, book 2.] 220 OF THE QUEEN CONSORT. [Book L due to the crown, to add likewise the quantity of gold or other renders reserved to tho queen. (n) These were frequently appropriated to particular purposes; to buy wool for her majesty's use, (o) to purchase oil for her lamps, (p) or to fur- nish her attire from head to foot, (q) which was frequently very costly, as one [*2211 single robe, in the fifth yeai of Henry II, stood the city of London in upwards of fourscore pounds. (r) A practice somewhat similar to that of the eastern countries, where whole cities and provinces were specifically assigned to purchase particular parts of the queen's apparel. (s) And, for a further addition to her income, this duty of queen-gold is supposed to have been origin- ally granted; those matters of grace and favour, out of which it arose, being frequently obtained from the crown by the powerful intercession of the queen. There are traces of its payment, though obscure ones, in the book of domesday, and in the great pipe-roll of Henry the First. (t) In the reign of Henry the Second the manner of collecting it appears to have been well understood, and it forms a distinct head in the ancient dialogue of the exchequer, (u) written in the time of that , and usually attributed to Gervase of Tilbury. From that time downwards it was regularly claimed and enjoyed by all the queen con- sorts of England till the death of Henry VIII; though, after the accession of the Tudor family, the collecting of it seems to have been much neglected: and there being no queen consort afterwards till the accession of James I, a period of near sixty years, its very nature and quantity became then a matter of doubt; and, being referred by the king to the chief justices and chief , their report of it was so very unfavorable, (v) that his consort Queen Anne (though she claimed it) yet never thought proper to exact it. In 1635, 11 Car. I, a time fertile of expedients for raising money upon dormant precedents in our old records (of which ship-money was a fatal instance,) the king, at the petition of his queen, , issued out his writ (w) for levying it; but after- wards purchased it of his consort at the price of ten thousand pounds; finding it, perhaps, too trifling and troublesome to levy. And when afterwards, at the .* 1 restoration, by *the abolition of the military tenures, and the fines that 22 2 were consequent upon them, the little that legally remained of this revenue was reduced to almost nothing at all, in vain did Mr. Prynne, by a treatise which does honour to his abilities as a painful and judicious antiquary, endeavour to excite Queen Catharine to revive this antiquated claim. Another ancient perquisite belonging to the queen consort, mentioned by all our old writers, (x) and, therefore only, worthy notice, is this: that, on the taking of a whale on the coast, which is a royal fish, it shall be divided between the king and queen; the head only being the king's property, and the tail of it the queen's. "De sturgoine observetur, quod rex illum habebit integrum: de balena vero sufficit, si rex habeat caput, et regina caudam." The reason of this whim- sical division, assigned by our ancient records, (y) was, to furnish the queen's wardrobe with whalebone. (2) But farther, though the queen is in all respects a subject, yet, in point of the security of her life and person, she is put on the same footing with the king. It i's equally treason (by the statute 25 Edw. III,) to compass or imagine the death

(n) Bedefordscire Maner. Lestone redd. per annum nxi lib. &c.; ad opu.nwren ii uncas auri.-Hereford- 8cre. In Lene &c consuetud, tpvpoitus maneril veniente domina sua (regina) in maner. prxrjentaret ei x'iii oraw denar. ut eset'lpea ixto anemo. Pryn. Append. to Aur. Beg. 2, 3. (o) iausa coadunandi lanam reglnze. Domesd. iid. (p) ,vita Lundon. Pro oleo ad lampad. reqlncv. (Hag. rot. p. temp. Hen. 1, ibid.) (q) Vicecomes Berkescire, Xvi 1.pro cappa reno. (Mag. rot. pp 19-22 Hen. 11, ibid.) Civitag Lund cordu- banarioregine xx s. (Mag. rot. 2 Hen. I. M Haox,Hist. Exch. 419.) (r) Pro roba ad ous regsew, quaterxx 1. et Vi 8Viii d. (Hag. rot. 5 Hen. HI,ibd. 250.) (s) Solere aiunt barbaros reges Persiarum ac Syrorum- uxoribu civitatee attribuere, ho moao; h4 civitao mullie redimicedumprebeat,hac in col um, kerc innee, &c. (Cic. inVerrem, 1ib.3, cap. 3.) (t) See Madox, Dieceptat. Epistolar.74. Pryn. Aur. Beg. Append. 5. (u) Lib. 2, e. 26. (v) Mr. Prynne, with some appearance of reason, insinuates that their researches were very superficial. (Aur.(. 19Re Rym.. 125.) Fmd. 721. (x) Bracton, 1. 3, c. 3. Britton, c. 17. Flet. 1. 1, c. 45 et 46. (y) Pryn. Aur. Beg. 127.

(2) [The reason is more whimsical than the division, for the whalebone lies entirely in tho head.] Chap. 4.] OF THE PrINtE OF . of our the king's companion, as of the king himself: and to violate, or defile the queen consort, amounts to the same high crime; as well in the per- son committing the fact, as in the queen herself, if consenting. A law of Henry the Eighth (z) made it treason also for any woman, who was not a virgin, to marry the king without informing him thereof: but this law was soon after repealed, (3) it trespassing too strongly as well on natural justice as female modesty. If, however, the queen be accused of any species of treason, she shall, (whether consort or dowager) be tried by the peers of parliament, as Queen Ann Boleyn was in 28 Hen. VIII. The husband of a , as Prince George of was to Queen Anne, is her subject: and may be guilty of high treason against her: but, in the instanse of conjugal infidelity, he is not subjected to the same penal *restrictions, for which the reason seems to be that, if a queen consort *2231] is unfaithful to the royal bed, this may debase or bastardize the heirs to the crown; but no such danger can be consequent on the infidelity of the husband to a queen regnant. A queen dowager is the widow of the king, and, as such, enjoys most of the privileges belonging to her as queen consort. But it is not high treason to con- spire her death, or to violate her chastity, for the same reason as was before alleged, because the succession to the crown is not thereby endangered. Yet still, pro dignitate regali, no man can marry a queen dowager without special licence from the king, on pain of forfeiting his lands and goods. This, Sir Ed- ward Coke (a) tells us, was enacted in parliament in 6 Hen. VI, though the statute be not in print. But she, though an alien born, shall still be entitled to after the king's demise, which no other alien is. (b) A queen dowager, when married again to a subject, doth not lose her regal dignity, as peeresses dowager do their peerage when they marry commoners. For Catherine, queen dowager of Henry V, though she married a private , Owen ap Mere- dith ap Theodore, commonly called , yet, by the name of Catherine, queen of England, maintained an action against the bishop of Carlisle. (4) And so, the queen dowager of Navarre, marrying with Edmond of Lancaster, brother to King Edward the First, maintained an action of dower (after the death of her second husband) by the name of queen of Navarre. (0) The , or heir-apparent to the crown, and also his royal con- sort, and the royal, or eldest daughter of the king, are likewise peculiarly regarded by the laws. For, by statute 25 Edw. III, to compass or conspire the death of the former, or to violate the chastity of either of the latter, are as much high treason as to conspire the death of the king, or violate the chastity of the queen. And this upon the same reason as was before given: because the prince of Wales is next in succession to the crown, and to violate his wife might taint the blood royal with bastardy: and the eldest daughter of the king is also alone inheritable to the *crown, on failure of issue male, and therefore more [*224] respected by the laws than any of her sisters, insomuch that [ 4 upon this, united with other (feudal) principles, while our military tenures were in force, the king might levy an aid for marrying his eldest daughter, and her only. The heir-apparent to the crown is usually made prince of Wales, (5) and (z) Stat. 33 Hen. VIII, c. 21. (a) 2 Inst. 18. See Riley's PIac. Parl. 672. (b) Co. Litt. 31. b. (c) 2 Inst. 50

(3) [This was a clause in the act, which attainted Queen Catharine Howard, and her accom- plices, for her incontinence; but it was not repealed till the 1 Edw. VI, c. 12, which abrogated all treasons created since the memorable statute in the 25 Edw. III.] (4) [The foregoing proposition is not really illustrated by the case of Catherine, inasmuch as her marriage with Tudor was carefully concealed, and not discovered till after her burial, when it produced great public excitement and uproar, as she left four children. It is needless to remind the reader that Tudor proved the ancestor of a new of British sovereigns.] (5) [This creation has not been confined to the heir-apparent, for both Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth were created by their father, Henry VIII, of Wales, each of them at the time (the latter after the illegitimation of Mary) being to the crown. 4 Hume, 113. Edward II was the first prince of Wales. When his father had subdued the kingdom of 143 224 OF THE KING'S CHILDREN. [Book I earl of Chester, by special creation, and investiture; but, being the king's eldest son, he is by of Cornwall, without any new creation. (6) The rest of the royal family may be considered in two different lights, accord- ing to the different senses in which the term royal family is used. The larger sense includes all those who are by any possibility inheritable to the crown. Such, before the revolution, were all the descendants of William the Conqueror, who had branched into an amazing extent, by intermarriages with the ancient . Since the revolution and act of settlement, it means the protestant issue of the Princess Sophia; now comparatively few in number, but which, in pro- cess of time, may possibly be as largely diffused. The more confined sense includes only those, who are within a certain degree of propinquity to the reigning prince, and to whom, therefore, the law pays an extraordinary regard and respect; but, after that degree is past, they fall into the rank of ordinary sub- jects, and are seldom considered any farther, unless called to the succession upon failure of the nearer lines. For, though collateral consanguinty is regarded indefinitely, with respect to inheritance or succession, yet it is and can only be regarded within some certain limits, in any other respect, by the natural consti- tution of things and the dictates of positive law. (e) The younger sons and laughters of the king, and other branches of the royal family, who are not in the immediate line of succession, were therefore little farther regarded by the ancient law, than to give them, to a certain degree, precedence before all peers and public officers, as well ecclesiastical as temporal. [*225] This is done by the statute 31 Hen. VIII, c. 10, *which enacts that no person, except the king's children, shall presume to sit or have place at the side of the cloth of estate in the parliament chamber; and that certain great officers therein named shall have precedence above all , except only such as shall happen to be the king's son, brother, uncle, nephew, (which Sir Edward Coke (f) explains to signify grandson or nepos), or brother's or sister's son. Therefore, after these degrees are past, peers or others of the blood royal are entitled to no place or precedence except what belongs to them by their per- sonal rank or dignity: which made Sir Edward Walker complain, (g) that by the hasty creation of Prince Rupert to be , and of the earl of Lenox to be duke of that name, previous to the creation of King Charles' second son, James, to be duke of York, it might happen that their grandsons would have precedence of the grandsons of the duke of York. Indeed under the description of the king's children his grandsons are held to be included, without having recourse to Sir Edward Coke's, interpretation of ,nephew; and therefore when his late majesty King George II created his grandson Edward, the second son of Frederick, prince of Wales, deceased, duke of York, and referred it to the house of to settle his place and precedence, d) 8 Rep. 1. Seld. Tit. of Hon. 2, 5. e) See Essay on Collateral Consanguinity, in Law Tracts, 4to. Oxon. 1771. (f) 4 Inst. 362. (g) Tracts, p. 301.

Wales, he promised the people of that country, upon condition of their submission, to give them a prince who had been born among them, and who could speak no other language. Upon their acquiescence with this deceitful offer, he conferred the of Wales upon his second son, Edward, then an infant. Edward, by the death of his eldest brother, Al- fonso, became heir to the crown, and from that time, this honor has been appropriated only to the eldest sons or eldest daughters of the of England. 2 Hume, 243.] (6) [The king's eldest living son and heir-apparent takes, under the grant ann. 11 E. III, the dukedom of Cornwall, and retains it during the king, his father's, life: on the accession of such duke to the crown, the vests in the king's eldest son living, and heir-apparent. But, if there be no eldest son and heir-apparent, the dukedom remains with the king, the heir-presumptive in no case being entitled to the dukedom. See 1 Ves. 294; Collin's Bar. 148. The rule may be shortly stated: until a prince be born, the king is seized; but when born, the prince becomes seized in fee of the possessions; nd, except as to presentations to bene- fices, leases generally made by the king are voidable by scire facias, sued at the instance of the prince. See Com. Dig. tit. Roy, Geo. V. Id. 280, 281 ; Ca. Ch. 215. But, as to what leases or grants made by the king shall be good, see stat. 33 Geo. II, c. 10. If the eldest son die, and leave a son, such son would not take; but the duchy reverts to the crown. And there is no minority with reference to the possessions of a .] Chap. 4.] MARRIAGE IN THE ROYAL FAMILY. 225 they certified (h) that he ought to have place next to the late duke of Cumber-' land, the then king's youngest son; and that he might have a seat on the left hand of the cloth of estate. But when, on the accession of his present majesty, those royal personages ceased to take place as the children, and ranked only as the brother and uncle, of the king; they also left their seats on the side of the cloth of estate; so that when the duke of Gloucester, his majesty's second brother, took his seat in the house of peers, (i) he was placed on the upper end of the earl's bench (on which the dukes usually sit) next to his royal highness the duke of York. And in 1718, upon a question referred to all the judges by King George I, it was resolved, by the opinion of ten against the other two, that the education and care of all the king's grandchildren while minors did belong of right to his majesty, as king of this , even during their father's life. (k) But they all agreed, that the care and approbation of their marriages, when grown up, belonged to the king their grandfather. (7) And the judges have more recently concurred in opinion, (1) that this care and approbation extend also to the presumptive heir of the crown; though to what other branches of the royal family the same did extend, they did not find pre- cisely determined. The most frequent instances of the crown's interposition go no *farther than nephews and neices; (m) but examples are not [*226] wanting of its reaching to more distant collaterals. (n) And the stat- ute 6 Henry VI, before mentioned, which prohibits the marriage of a queen dowager without the consent of the king, assigns this reason for it: (8) "because the disparagement of the queen shall give greater comfort and example to other of estate, who are of the blood-royal, more lightly to disparage themselves." (o) Therefore by the statute 28 lIen. VIII, c. 18, (repealed, among other statutes of treasons, by 1 Edw. VI, c. 12,) it was made high treason, for any man to contract marriage with the king's children or reputed children, his sisters or aunts ex parte paterna, or the children of his brethren or sisters; being exactly the same degrees to which precedence is allowed by the statute 31 Hen. VIII, before mentioned. And now, by statute 12 Geo. III, c. 11, no descendant of the body of King George II, (other than the issue of princesses married into foreign families) is capable of contracting matrimony, without the previous consent of the king signified under the great seal; and any marriage contracted without such consent is void. Provided, that such of the said descendants as are above the age of twenty-five may, after a twelvemonth's notice given to the king's privy council, contract and solemnize marriage with- out the consent of the crown; unless both houses of parliament shall, before the expiration of the said year, expressly declare their disapprobation of such intended marriage. And all persons solemnizing, assisting, or being present at, any such prohibited marriage, shall incur the penalties of the statute of prwvmunire. (9) (h) Lords' Journ. 24 Apr. 1760. (1) Lords' Journ. 10 Jan. 1765. (k) Fortesc. Al. 401-440. (1) Lords' Journ. 28 Feb. 1772. (m) See (besides the instances cited in Fortescue Aland) for brothers and sisters; under king Edward II, I Rym. 392, 403 411, 501, 508, 512, 549, 683:-under Henry V. 9 Rym. 710, 711, 741 :-under Edward IV. 11 Ryin. 564, 56, 590, 601 :-under Henry ViII. 13 Rym. 249, 423:-under Edward VI. 7 St. Tr. 3, 8. For nephews and nteces;' under Henry HI. 1 Rym. 852 ;-under Edward I. 2 Rym. 489:-under Edward IH. 5 Rym. 561:-under Richard II. 7 Rym. 264:-under Richard Ill. 12 Rym. 232, 244:-under Henry VHi. 12 Rym. 26, 31. (n) To great neces,* under Edward II. 5 Rym. 575, 644. To first cousins;*under Edward II. 5 Rym. 177. To second and third cotisns; under Edward III. 5 Rym. 729:-under Richard H. 7 Rym. 225:-under Henry VI. 10 Rym. 22:-unuder Henry VIL 12 Rym. 529:-under queen Elizabeth, Camd. Ann. A. D. 1562. To fourth cousins under Henry v11. 12 Rym. 829. To the b/ood-royal In general; under Richard II. 7 Rym. 787. (o) R. Plac. Parl. 672.

(7) A full report of the arguments of the judges may be seen in State Trials, vol. xi. 295. (8) [The occasion of this statute was the marriage of Catharine, mother to Henry VI, with Owen Tudor, a private gentleman. See p. 223.] (9) In 1793 the Duke of Sussex was married while in Rome to the Lady Augusta Murray, without the consent of the crown; and on his return to England caused the marriage to be celebrated anew. Some question was made whether the marriage act could have any force beyond the British dominions, and the king directed a suit for the nullity of the marriage to be instituted. This was done accordingly, and the court of arches declared the marriage absolutely null and void. Heseltine v. Lady Murray, 2 Add. 400. This, however, did not put VOL. I.-19 145