American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals Scholarship & Research 2019 Reimagining Prosecution: In Search of the True Progressive Angela J. Davis American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Reimagining Prosecution: In Search of the True Progressive, 3 UCLA Crim. Just. L. Rev. 1 (2019). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship & Research at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UCLA UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review Title Reimagining Prosecution: A Growing Progressive Movement Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2rq8t137 Journal UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 3(1) Author Davis, Angela J. Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California REIMAGINING PROSECUTION: A Growing Progressive Movement Angela J. Davis About the Author Angela J. Davis is a Professor at American University Washington College of Law and a former director of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia. She thanks Meagan Allen and Philip Green for their research assistance. Abstract Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the criminal justice system. At least ninety percent of all criminal cases are prosecuted on the state level, and in all but five jurisdictions, the chief prosecutor (also known as the district attorney) is an elected official. Most district attor- neys run unopposed and serve for decades. However, in recent years, a number of incumbent district attorneys have been challenged and defeat- ed by individuals who pledged to use their power and discretion to reduce the incarceration rate and eliminate unwarranted racial disparities in the criminal justice system. These so-called “progressive prosecutors” have enjoyed some modest successes, but many have faced challenges—from within and outside of their offices. This Article discusses some of these successes and challenges and proposes guidelines to assist newly-elected district attorneys who are committed to criminal justice reform. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................2 I. Mass Incarceration, Racial Disparities, and the Role of the Prosecutor ...............................................................................3 II. The Election of Progressive Prosecutors .....................................6 A. Kim Foxx ........................................................................................7 B. Larry Krasner ..............................................................................10 C. Dan Satterberg .............................................................................12 © 2019 Angela J. Davis. All rights reserved. 1 2 CJLR 2019:1 III. The Challenges of Progressive Prosecution ............................. 15 A. Larry Krasner .............................................................................. 16 B. Aramis Ayala ................................................................................ 18 C. Rachael Rollins ............................................................................ 19 IV. Implementing a Progressive Agenda ............................................22 A. Defining the Progressive Prosecutor ..........................................22 B. Politics ...........................................................................................22 C. Prior Experience ..........................................................................23 D. Race and Gender .........................................................................24 V. Guidelines for the Progressive Prosecutor ...............................24 A. Communication ...........................................................................24 B. Education and Training ...............................................................25 C. New Leadership and Hiring Policies .........................................26 Conclusion ..................................................................................................27 “If you are really concerned about how the criminal justice system treats African-Americans, the best way to protest is to vote. Do what they just did in Philadelphia and Boston and elect state attorneys and district attorneys who are looking at issues in a new light.”1 —Former President Barack Obama at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, September 7, 2018 Introduction In Berger v. United States,2 the Supreme Court noted that the pros- ecutor’s “interest . in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.” Nonetheless, most prosecutors have focused on seeking convictions in criminal cases. This perspective has greatly contributed to the phenomenon of mass incarceration and its many unjust collateral consequences.3 In recent years, some elected prosecutors have sought to change this narrative by using their power and discretion with the goals of not only enforcing the law, but also reducing mass incarceration, eliminat- ing racial disparities, and seeking justice for all, including the accused. This small but growing movement of so-called “progressive” prosecutors has achieved varying levels of success. Some of these prosecutors report 1. Read Obama’s Full Speech from the University of Illinois, NBC News Chicago (Sept. 7, 2018), https://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/obama-university- of-illinois-full-speech-492719531.html [https://perma.cc/CNS6-65ED]. 2. Berger v. U.S., 295 U.S. 78 (1935). 3. See generally Angela J. Davis, The Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to End Mass Incar- ceration, 44 Hofstra L. Rev. 1063 (2016). REIMAGINING PROSECUTION 3 modest improvements, but many have faced serious challenges from within and outside of their offices. In this Article, I explore this new vision of prosecution, including its successes and challenges. Can progressive prosecutors make significant progress towards the goals of eliminating mass incarceration and unwar- ranted racial disparities? What are the factors that impact their ability to affect change and how can those factors be managed? Part I briefly describes and discusses how prosecutors contribute to mass incarceration and racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Part II discusses the recent movement of elected progressive prosecutors with a focus on three prosecutor offices that have implemented poli- cies to reduce the jail and prison population. Part III examines some of the internal and external challenges faced by prosecutors who have implemented progressive policies. Part IV discusses factors that affect a prosecutor’s ability to implement reforms and proposes guidelines for elected prosecutors who are committed to transforming the existing model of prosecution. I. Mass Incarceration, Racial Disparities, and the Role of the Prosecutor The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world with over 2.1 million people in its prisons and jails.4 Additionally, there are unwarranted racial disparities at every step of the criminal process, from arrest to sentencing. People of color are 37 percent of the general population, yet they make up 67 percent of the prison population.5 Black men are six times as likely to be incarcerated as white men, and Latino men are twice as likely to be incarcerated as white men.6 The phenomenon of mass incarceration in the United States is largely the result of policy decisions made during the past forty years. The War on Drugs and the passage of harsh sentencing laws are among the causes of a 500 percent increase in the number of people in the nation’s prisons and jails.7 The collateral consequences of mass incarceration in- clude disenfranchisement, the loss of public housing and public benefits, difficulty finding employment, separation of families, and fiscal burdens on state and federal budgets. 4. Roy Walmsley, Inst. for Crim. Pol’y Res., World Prison Population List, World Prison Brief 2, 6 (12th ed. 2018), http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/ resources/downloads/wppl_12.pdf [https://perma.cc/748K-WRXH]. 5. Criminal Justice Facts, Sent’g Project, https://www.sentencingproject.org/ criminal-justice-facts (last visited Mar. 6, 2019) [https://perma.cc/VJK4-F848]. 6. Id. 7. Id. See also Lauren Carroll, How the War on Drugs Affected Incarceration Rates, PolitiFact (Jul. 10, 2016), https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ statements/2016/jul/10/cory-booker/how-war-drugs-affected-incarceration-rates [http://perma.cc/X6H8-RKM3] (discussing the validity of claims that the war on drugs led to an incarceration increase that disproportionately affected poor peo- ple and minorities). 4 CJLR 2019:1 Many factors contribute to the racial disparities in the criminal jus- tice system. There are the socioeconomic factors such as poverty, lack of education, and high unemployment in communities of color—all of which are impacted by race discrimination in society as a whole. There is also disproportionate