Ultimate Guide to Kettlebells
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Study on the Changes in the Number of Participating Athletes in the National Disabled Games Between 2008 and 2012, Using the Latent Growth Model
A Study on the Changes in the Number of Participating Athletes in the National Disabled Games between 2008 and 2012, Using the Latent Growth Model Cheng-Lung Wu, Department of Marine Sports and Recreation, National Penghu University of Science and Technology, Taiwan ABSTRACT This study employed the Latent Growth Model (LGM) to analyze changes in the number of participating athletes in the National Disabled Games from all cities and counties in Taiwan between 2008 and 2012. The aim was to examine the changes and dynamic process of the participating athletes at different times. The result of the study indicates that between 2008 and 2012, the initial average of the number of participating athletes in the National Disabled Games is 53.23, and the average growth is 3.93; the respective t values are 6.78 and 2.81, which are both statistically significant (*p<.05). In other words, the average number of participating athletes in the National Disabled Games in 2008 was 53.23, and continued to grow at an average rate of 3.93 persons per year. There was significant growth in the number of participating athletes between 2008 and 2012 in all cities and counties. In addition, there was significant difference in the growth rates among different cities and counties. Keywords: Latent Growth Model (LGM), physical and mental impairments, National Disabled Games INTRODUCTION It has become a global trend to improve the welfare of the physically and mentally challenged. The degree to which a country is capable of providing adequate care and opportunities for its physically and mentally challenged citizens is also an important index in evaluating its overall development. -
USA Commerical Products Ver. 3.0 CALL: (717) 767-6481 / 1 (800) 358-9675 | FAX: (717) 764-0044 | 3300 Board Rd
USA Commerical Products ver. 3.0 CALL: (717) 767-6481 / 1 (800) 358-9675 | FAX: (717) 764-0044 | 3300 Board Rd. York, PA 17406 www.yorkbarbell.com OUR HISTORY The York Barbell name is synonymous with the essence of weightlifting since its inception. York Barbell Company and its legendary Olympic weightlifting team, The York Barbell Club, wrote a substantial chapter in the biography of weightlifting, equipment development, and nutritional supplement industry. 75 years ago, York Barbell began shaping the fitness industry through product design, education, competition, and athletic sponsorship. Named “Father of World Weightlifting” by the International Weightlifting Federation, Bob Hoffman founded York Barbell in 1932 and immediately began pioneering many of today’s accepted exercise philosophies. As a prolific writer of books and articles, Hoffman tirelessly promoted the benefits of exercise successfully encouraging its practice to the military and the general public. Bob and his beloved York Barbell Company developed among the first lines of exercise equipment in the industry. A pioneer in the health food business, Hoffman introduced a line of nutritional supplements in the early 1950s and developed the first energy bar in 1966. From the decades of the 30’s through the 70’s, York Barbell flexed its muscle with its Olympic lifting teams. The renowned York Barbell Club dominated the Olympic scene with over 40 national championships and numerous Olympic Gold Medalists. Today, the corporate office of York Barbell Company houses the official Weightlifting Hall of Fame and Museum in York, Pennsylvania. Through its long history, York Barbell revolutionized the design of training equipment and products. -
Uplift-Desk-Job.Pdf
Liability and Participation Agreement Uplift Fitness, LLC strongly recommends that recommend and you hereby release Uplift Fit- you consult with your physician before begin- ness and its agents from any and all claims or ning any exercise program or making any die- causes of action, known or unknown, now or in tary changes or undertaking any other activities the future related to participating in activities or described on the website at upliftfit- information described in or arising out of Uplift nessohio.com, or from the social media posts Fitness content. These conditions may include, made by Uplift Fitness. You need to be in good but are not limited to, heart attacks, muscle physical condition to be able to participate in the strains, muscle pulls, muscle tears, broken exercises described in the Uplift Fitness Content bones, shin splints, heat prostration, injuries to including the Uplift Fitness training programs. knees, injuries to back, injuries to foot, or any Specifically, by accepting these terms and pro- other illness or soreness that you may incur, in- ceeding with Uplift Fitness Programs you here- cluding death. by affirm that you are in good physical condi- Uplift Fitness, LLC is not a licensed medical tion and do not suffer from any known disability care provider and represents that it has no exper- or condition which would prevent or limit your tise in diagnosing, examining, or treating medi- participation in vigorous physical activity in- cal conditions of any kind, or in determining the cluding but not limited to: resistance training, effect of any specific exercise on a medical con- body weight calisthenics, cardiovascular train- dition. -
Building the Base of the Strength Pyramid Many People Take the Wrong Approach to Strength Training
Building the Base of the Strength Pyramid Many people take the wrong approach to strength training. Bill Starr says the simple, focused approach is the best way to build strength quickly. By Bill Starr March 2010 Susannah Dy/CrossFit Journal Susannah Dy/CrossFit When constructing any sort of structure, from a simple shed for the back yard to a stadium that will seat 100,000 people, you need to create a solid foundation first. If this isn’t done properly, the structure will not be substantial, nor will it last for very long. 1 of 9 Copyright © 2010 CrossFit, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Subscription info at http://journal.crossfit.com CrossFit is a registered trademark ‰ of CrossFit, Inc. Feedback to [email protected] Visit CrossFit.com Strength Pyramid ... (continued) This same idea applies to the process of developing a Journal Susannah Dy/CrossFit strong body. Time and energy must be spent establishing a firm base. I like to think the pyramids of Egypt were built in this manner: they could only go as high as the foundation would support. The same goes for the human body. In the Beginning, Less Is More While most of those who embark on a mission to make their bodies functionally stronger understand the logic behind this idea, very few put together a program that will satisfy it, mostly because the real reason they started lifting weights was to obtain bigger arms and chests. So, from the onset, their focus is on their upper bodies and not the entire structure. Another mistake many coaches and beginners make in this regard is that they include far too many exercises in the routines. -
The Importance of Load Vector in Physique Enhancement and Sport
The Importance of Load Vector in Physique Enhancement and Sport Training An Excerpt from Advanced Techniques in Glutei Maximi Strengthening Available at www.TheGluteGuy.Com By Bret Contreras, MA CSCS Most experts in the fitness industry fail to recognize the role that the load vector plays in determining hip extensor recruitment during hip extension exercises. As a case in point, most articles written on glutei maximi training recommend axial loaded exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and lunges. But axial exercises are greatly outperformed in glutei maximi mean and peak activation by anteroposterior exercises. I don’t expect the experts to know this, as to my knowledge, I am the first author who is pointing this out scientifically. Although it’s been hinted about by strength coach Mike Boyle in the past and recently inferred (during the time I was writing this book) by vertical jump specialist Kelly Baggett, and although there have been many small-scale EMG studies performed in the scientific literature, to my knowledge a large-scale EMG study involving dozens of advanced and complex hip extension exercises has never been disclosed to the public – until now.1,2 I will discuss specific exercises and EMG data later in this book, but first let’s continue talking about load vectors. I just performed a Google search for “best glute exercises” and the first article that came up was a web document written by Ray Burton, an ISSA Certified Trainer out of Canada, entitled “Glute Exercises – My Top Three Choices.” His top three choices are reverse lunges, sumo squats, and a special step up (a hybrid step-down/assisted pistol movement), which are all axial loaded exercises.3 I’m not trying to pick on Burton, as articles like these are littered throughout the Internet and forums. -
4 Week Home Kettlebell Workout
Weeks 1 & 4 4 WEEK HOME KETTLEBELL WORKOUT Day 1 Full Body Tabata: Day 2 Full Body ARAMP: Perform each exercises for 20 seconds then Perform as many exercises as you can within rest 10 seconds. Repeat Circuit x 3. Rest 90 60 seconds. Rest for 90 seconds after seconds between circuits. completing the full circuit. Repeat Circuit x 4. Circuit 1 ARAMP Circuit Kettlebell Goblet Squat Kettlebell Reverse Lunge w/ Press x 30s side Rest 10 seconds Kettlebell Press Kettlebell Single Arm High Pulls x 30s side Rest 10 seconds Kettlebell Deadlift with Burpee x 60s Kettlebell Plank Drag x 60s Circuit 2 Kettlebell Tricep Extensions x 60s Kettlebell Two Arm Swing Kettlebell Hip Thrusts x 60s Rest 10 seconds Single Arm Row (10s per side) Rest 90s before repeating ARMAP circuit again Rest 10 seconds Circuit 3 Kettlebell Jack Press Day 4 Full Body EMOM: Rest 10 seconds Perform the total number of reps for each Kettlebell Russian Twist exercise Every Minute on The Minute Rest 10 seconds (EMOM). Every minute time frame has a programmed work amount (such as, 10 push Day 3 Full Body Ladder: ups) with the remaining amount of time to be take as rest. Each exercise will start with 6 reps. You will go through all exercises first before you start another round. Each round you add 2 reps to each exercise (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16) until you Minute 0-1 Kettlebell Squat & Press x 12 get to 16 reps per exercise Minute 1-2 Kettlebell Lateral Walks x 12 side Minute 2-3 Kettlebell Renegade Row x 8 side Ladder Circuit (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16) Minute 3-4 Kettlebell Pass-through lunge x 12 Kettlebell Deadlift Minute 4-5 Kettlebell Front Raise x 12 Kettlebell Sit & Press Minute 5-6 Kettlebell Speed Skaters x 12 side Kettlebell Lateral Lunge (per side) Kettlebell Windmills (per side) Repeat all exercises for 5 rounds rest for 30 seconds between rounds Kettlebell Overhead Walking Lunge (per side) Kettlebell Chest Press Rest 90s before repeating again Weeks 2 & 3 4 WEEK HOME KETTLEBELL WORKOUT All four workouts comprise six exercises divided into three supersets, labelled 1A and 1B, 2A and 2B, and 3A and 3B. -
Steve Cotter
Kettlebell Training Steve Cotter HUMAN KINETICS Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cotter, Steve, 1970- Kettlebell training / Steve Cotter. pages cm 1. Kettlebells. 2. Weight training. I. Title. GV547.5.C68 2013 613.713--dc23 2013013814 ISBN-10: 1-4504-3011-2 (print) ISBN-13: 978-1-4504-3011-1 (print) Copyright © 2014 by Steve Cotter All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, the reproduction or utilization of this work in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including xerography, photocopying, and recording, and in any information storage and retrieval system, is forbidden without the written permission of the publisher. This publication is written and published to provide accurate and authoritative information relevant to the subject matter presented. It is published and sold with the understanding that the author and publisher are not engaged in rendering legal, medical, or other professional services by reason of their authorship or publication of this work. If medical or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. The web addresses cited in this text were current as of August 2013, unless otherwise noted. Acquisitions Editor: Tom Heine; Developmental Editor: Laura Pulliam; Assistant Editor: Elizabeth Evans; Copyeditor: Alisha Jeddeloh; Graphic Designer: Joe Buck; Cover Designer: Keith Blomberg; Photograph (cover): © Tono Balaguer/easyFotostock; Photographs (interior): © Human Kinetics; Visual Production Assistant: Joyce Brumfield; Photo Production Manager: Jason Allen; Printer: United Graphics We thank Grinder Gym in San Diego, California, for assistance in providing the location for the photo shoot for this book. -
The Effects of Different Types of Strength Training for Recreational Purposes on the Body Composition and Strength Development of University Students
Asian Journal of Education and Training Vol. 5, No. 2, 381-385, 2019 ISSN(E) 2519-5387 DOI: 10.20448/journal.522.2019.52.381.385 © 2019 by the authors; licensee Asian Online Journal Publishing Group The Effects of Different Types of Strength Training for Recreational Purposes on the Body Composition and Strength Development of University Students Serhat Özbay Faculty of Sport Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey. Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CrossFit and resistance training on maximal strength, isometric strength and strength continuity in recreational student athletes. 28 healthy male volunteer students who were doing sport for recreational purposes participated in the study. After the participants were randomly divided into two groups, strength tests were performed and body composition measurements were taken before and after the 16-week training period. Bench press and squat were applied to determine maximal force; leg and handgrip strength were applied to determine isometric force; pull-up and push-up tests were applied to determine the continuity of strength. Body composition measurements were performed with electronic scales. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0 program. Significance level was accepted as p <0.05. The CrossFit training program included consecutive 5 pull-ups, 10 push-ups and 15 squat exercises for 20 minutes (CrossFit-Cindy). Resistance training program consisted of 3 sets of bench press, lat pull down, leg press, biceps curl and triceps extension exercises with 3 minute intervals using 70% of the weights the participants could perform with pre-determined maximum 1 repetition. The results of the study showed that body fat percentages of both groups decreased significantly, performance variables increased significantly and body weight did not change significantly. -
Sports Quota
http://www.persmin.nic.in/dopt/Chapter%2015%20- %20Sports%20Quota.html DP & AR O.M. NO.14015/1/76-Estt (D)- Dated the 4th August, 1980 Subject: Appointment of meritorious sportsmen to Group C and D posts in relaxation of the procedure. General Scheme Under this Department 's O.M. No. 14/1/72-Estt. (D) dated 28.12.72 orders were issued that the Secretary of the Ministry/Department or the Head of Department under it may recruit a meritorious sportsmen to a class III or class IV service/post (now Group C & D) in the Ministry/Department/Establishment, as the case may be, direct recruitment to which is made otherwise than through a competitive examination held by the Union Public Service Commission, subject to the provisions contained in that O.M. with the coming into being on the Staff Selection Commission, recruitment to group C posts have generally to be made through the Staff Selection Commission. The entire policy of recruitment of sportsmen in various Departments/Offices has since been examined and the following orders are issued for providing for relaxation of recruitment rules to the extent mentioned below:- 1. ELIGIBILITY a. Appointments under these orders can be made of a sportsman considered meritorious with reference to the following criteria :- a. Sportsmen who have represented a State or the country in the National or International competition in any of the games/sports mentioned in the list at Annexure (A). (ii) Sportsmen who have represented their University in the Inter-University Tournaments conducted by the Inter- University Sports Board in any of the sports/games show in the list at Annexure 'A'. -
Wrpf Technical Rulebook
WRPF TECHNICAL RULEBOOK AMERICAS Contents GENERAL RULES OF POWERLIFTING..................................................................................... EQUIPMENT…………………………........................................................................................... ..... WEIGHING IN............................................................................................................................ ORDER OF COMPETITION ....................................................................................................... REFEREE AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE............................................................................... EQUIPPED DIVISION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… . … I. GENERAL RULES OF POWERLIFTING 1.1. General 1.1.1. World Raw Powerlifting Federation (WRPF), is an independent sport organization the main aim of which is to popularize and promote RAW powerlifting in the world. 1.1.2. Technical Rules book of the WRPF is the main document, which identifies basic principles of organizing and running WRPF championships. The athletes, who are performing at the competitions, coaches and officials, must know and abide these rules. 1.1.3. The WRPF recognizes the following lifts in all competitions run under WRPF rules: Full power: Squat, Bench Press, Deadlift; Push-pull (Bench Press and Deadlift); Bench Press Only and Deadlift Only; 1.1.4. Raw and Classic Powerlifting Definition: *The approved costume and equipment allowed for the RAW division competitions will be defined as a non–supportive, -
Comparing Forward and Backward Chaining in Teaching Olympic Weightlifting James W
The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Faculty Publications Winter 1-1-2019 Comparing Forward and Backward Chaining In Teaching Olympic Weightlifting James W. Moore University of Southern Mississippi, [email protected] Laura M. Quintero University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Moore, J. W., Quintero, L. M. (2019). Comparing Forward and Backward Chaining In Teaching Olympic Weightlifting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(1), 50-59. Available at: https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/16319 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS 2019, 52, 50–59 NUMBER 1(WINTER) COMPARING FORWARD AND BACKWARD CHAINING IN TEACHING OLYMPIC WEIGHTLIFTING JAMES W. MOORE AND LAURA M. QUINTERO UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI The popularity of Olympic-style weightlifting in fitness routines is growing, but participating in these exercises with improper technique places lifters at increased risk for injury. Fitness training professionals have developed multiple teaching strategies, but have not subjected these strategies to systematic evaluation, particularly with novice lifters. Two strategies recommended by profes- sional training organizations are akin to forward and backward chaining, which have been shown effective at teaching other novel, complex behaviors. The present study compared these forward- and backward-chaining-like strategies to teach novice lifters “the clean” and “the snatch,” two Olympic weightlifting movements frequently incorporated into high-intensity training programs. -
The Clean Greg Glassman
CrossFit Journal Article Reprint. First Published in CrossFit Journal Issue 11 - July 2003 The Clean Greg Glassman The King of All Exercises Were it not for the snatch, the clean would have but laughable challenges to the title “King of All Exercises.” Oddly, we start our examination of the clean with mention of the snatch, as many of the superlatives attributed to the clean apply equally to the snatch. Clearing the air early with admission of the snatch’s peer status, we can speak more freely of the clean’s unrivaled qualities and need not repeatedly suggest the snatch’s possible exception to the clean’s peerless qualities. Mechanics The clean is a pure bit of functionality. The clean is simply pulling a load from the ground to the shoulders where frequently the object is being readied for lifting overhead. reason, while these are important movements, they are With the clean we take ourselves from standing over an not the clean’s peers. Power is that important. object pulling it, to under it and supporting. (Compare this to the muscle-up where we take ourselves from Developmental Qualities under an object to supporting ourselves over it.) The clean builds immense strength and power but In its finest expression the clean is a process by which this is only the more obvious part of the clean’s story. the hips and legs launch a weight upward from the (This complex movement actually contains within itself ground to about bellybutton height and then retreat two princely exercises – the deadlift and squat.) The under the weight with blinding speed to catch it before clean is unique among weight training exercises in that it has had the time to become a runaway train.