DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Development AGENDA ITEM I-2 Community Development STAFF REPORT City Council Meeting Date: 3/23/2021 Staff Report Number: 21-065-CC Regular Business: Authorize the city manager to negotiate a scope of work and fee and execute an agreement with the M- Group for the housing element (2023-2031) update and related work Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the city manager to negotiate a scope of work and fee, not to exceed $982,000, and execute a contract with the M-Group for the housing element (2023-2031) update and related rezonings, and the preparation of an environmental justice element, safety element update, Fiscal Impact Analysis and environmental impact report. Policy Issues The components of the housing element update will consider a number of land use, environmental and housing policies. Background Under California law every jurisdiction in the State is required to update the housing element every eight years and have it certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD.) The housing element is one of seven State-mandated elements (or topic areas) of a General Plan for all jurisdictions in California, and requires local governments to adequately plan to meet their existing and project housing needs for all income levels. The City’s current housing element was last adopted in April 2014 and covers the planning period from 2015-2023. The next cycle’s deadline for jurisdictions in the Bay Area, which is set by HCD, is January 2023, and covers planning period for 2023-2031. Recognizing the complexity, importance and time-intensive nature of the housing element process and its related work, the City Council unanimously supported the initiation of the housing element as one of its top five project priorities for fiscal year (FY) 2020-21 August 18, 2020. Subsequently, on November 10, 2020, the City Council amended the FY 2020-21 budget by $1.69 million for the housing element and its work related. This expenditure includes up to $1.5 million for the project components and the partial-year funding for 2.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) personnel, including recruitment for the community development director position. The City Council has continued to express support for the housing element as a priority, most recently during its discussion on goals and priorities March 9, 2021. The housing element must be consistent with the City’s general plan and updated for compliance with State law and include City goals, policies and implementing programs to facilitate the construction of new housing and preservation of existing housing to meet the needs across all economic levels of the City. The City’s anticipated housing allocation for the next planning period is approximately 3,000 units, which is a 358 percent increase from the last housing element cycle. Menlo Park is not alone in seeing a large increase in City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org Page I-2.1 Staff Report #: 21-065-CC its housing allocation. The project is complex and is anticipated to consist of multiple components, including the following: • Conduct robust public engagement process to ensure that the project reflects the community’s goals and values; • Update the housing element, including addressing affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH) and other State mandates; • Amend the land use element, the zoning ordinance and/or rezone property to demonstrate compliance with the City’s regional housing needs allocation (RHNA); • Develop an environmental justice element (SB 1000) to advance equity and address potential environmental health risks in the City; • Update safety element to address climate adaptation and resiliency strategies in compliance with State law (SB 379); and • Prepare a fiscal impact analysis and environmental impact report to inform the public and decision- makers of potential financial and environmental impacts of the project. The housing element update process must be inclusive, and develop policies and programs that are measurable and achievable. This update process is an opportunity to take a deeper dive at historical land use practices and look toward the future through a lens of equity and sustainability while still achieving a certified housing element. Analysis Consultant selection process Choosing the right consultant to lead this effort is a key first step. The consultant team must not only be subject matter experts, but also be able build trust, effectively communicate ideas, and use innovative strategies to engage a diverse set of community stakeholders. In December 2020, staff issued a request for qualifications (RFQ) to seek a “prime consultant” to work with the City to assemble and manage a team of qualified subconsultants to accomplish the project. The City received statement of qualifications from two highly qualified firms and then requested proposals from each firm. The housing element update consultant request for proposals (RFP) is included as Attachment A. In February 2021, the City Council authorized the creation of a housing element interview panel, which represented varied community interests and perspectives from the City Council, Commissions and staff. The objective of the interview panel was to provide a recommendation on a preferred consultant to the City Council. The panel was comprised of the following members: • City Councilmember Cecilia Taylor • City Councilmember Jen Wolosin • Planning Commission Chair Henry Riggs • Planning Commissioner Chris DeCardy • Housing Commission Chair Karen Grove • Deputy Director of Community Development – Housing Rhonda Coffman • Assistant Community Services Director Adriane Lee-Bird The panel interviewed each firm and subsequently sought additional information from each firm based upon aspects of their proposal and a need to dive deeper into key topic areas. Each team brought great experience and different strengths, making a recommendation very difficult. The panel believed that additional community input would be valuable in the process, and follow-up meetings with the firms were City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org Page I-2.2 Staff Report #: 21-065-CC scheduled. The following members formed the smaller interview group, which participated in a focus group exercise with each firm: • City Councilmember Taylor • City Councilmember Wolosin • Planning Commissioner Michele Tate • Pastor Arturo Arias Following the exercise, the smaller group recommended the M-Group as the preferred consultant for not only their experience, but also their new perspectives it could bring to the process. The group also highlighted areas of the scope that should be enhanced and further developed as staff negotiates the scope of work, keeping in mind the overall budget. The two key areas are public engagement and the creation of an advisory committee, which are discussed in more detail in the proposed scope of work and budget section below. Proposed scope of work and budget The project is proposed to be led by the M-Group, who will manage a number of subconsultants to provide technical expertise for the various components. Table 1 identifies the consultant team members proposed by the M-Group and Attachment B is the draft scope of work that was included in the firm’s proposal. The proposed fee, inclusive of a 10% administrative fee for managing subconsultants and a 10 percent contingency fee to be used only with City approval, is $982,011. The proposal also includes a variety of optional items for an all-inclusive fee total of $1,195,216. By comparison, the proposal submitted by Baird + Driskell totaled $799,101 without a contingency or administrative fee. Table 1: Consultant team Consultant Project components Lead consultant; housing element, M-Group environmental justice element and safety element ESA Environmental impact report Hexagon Transportation (EIR) BAE Fiscal impact analysis The proposed work plan consists of five major tasks, which is further detailed by subtasks and deliverables. To successfully complete the project by December 2022, the timeline assumes that tasks will be conducted concurrently. The five major tasks are: • Task 1 – Project administration • The lead consultant will manage the project and subconsultants and collaborate with staff to deliver the project on time and within budget. • Task 2 – Community engagement strategy • Staff and the consultant team will develop a robust community engagement plan that includes strategies and techniques for broad participation, a list of expected meetings, events and activities, and their desired outcomes. The community engagement strategy needs to be innovative and inclusive, making sure that information is accessible and input can be provided in multiple ways. • Task 3 – Housing element and related work • The City is working in collaboration with other jurisdictions in San Mateo County as part of 21 elements on the preparation of the housing element. The M-Group will coordinate with staff and 21 City of Menlo Park 701 Laurel St., Menlo Park, CA 94025 tel 650-330-6600 www.menlopark.org Page I-2.3 Staff Report #: 21-065-CC elements to prepare, at a minimum, the required components for a certified housing element. These tasks include, but are not limited to, a review and evaluation of current housing element, a housing needs assessment, an assessment of fair housing, analysis of non-governmental and governmental constraints, site inventory and analysis, and rezoning of sites to accommodate the City’s housing allocation. • Task 4 – Environmental justice and safety elements • The preparation of the environmental justice element is a new chapter of the general plan and will address past practices that have disproportionately affected low-income residents, communities of color and immigrant communities, and focus on strategies and polices to help ensure the future health and well-being of the entire community. The environmental justice element is anticipated to encompass topics related to pollution, food access, access to public parks and other community facilities, public transit, climate change, education, housing and civic engagement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minutes New York State Racing and Wagering
    MINUTES NEW YORK STATE RACING AND WAGERING SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2000 A meeting of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board was held on Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 11:30 a.m. at the Racing & Wagering Board’ s Albany Office located at 1 Watervliet Avenue Extension, Albany, New York. The meeting was called to order at 11:40 a.m. In Attendance Were: Michael J. Hoblock, Jr., Chairman Joseph Neglia, Member Bennett Liebman, Member Edward Martin, Executive Director Nicole Thuillez, Secretary to the Board Robert Feuerstein, General Counsel Tom Casaregola, Director of Audits and Investigations Joe Lynch, Chief of Racing Operations Also in Attendance Were: Dianne Landor, NYSR&WB Nicole Robilotto, NYSR&WB Rick Goodell, NYSR&WB Heather Bennett, Bennett Firm Bill Heller, Thoroughbred Times Bill Crowell, Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P.C. Tom Precious, Blood Horse/Buffalo News PUBLIC COMMENTS: No public comments were made. A. The Board approved the minutes of the Board meeting held on January 21, 2000 B. ITEMS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, DENIED OR DEFERRED BY THE CHAIRMAN 1. BUFFALO RACEWAY REQUEST TO SIMULCAST FREEHOLD RACEWAY For entry into the minutes, on January 25, 2000, approval was granted for the request by Buffalo Raceway to simulcast Freehold Raceway in New Jersey. This approval covers both Freehold race meetings contested during the year 2000. 2. BUFFALO RACEWAY REQUEST TO EXPORT SIMULCAST TO WESTERN OTB For entry into the minutes, on January 25, 2000, approval was granted for the request for the three-month Buffalo Raceway simulcast contract with the Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Report Concar Passage Mixed-Use Project PA18-052
    Final Environmental Impact Report Concar Passage Mixed-Use Project PA18-052 Prepared by the In Consultation with July 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2.0 Summary of Draft EIR Public Review Process .............................................................. 2 Section 3.0 Draft EIR Recipients ...................................................................................................... 3 Section 4.0 Responses to Draft EIR Comments ................................................................................ 4 Section 5.0 Draft EIR Text Revisions ............................................................................................. 61 Appendix A: Draft EIR Comment Letters Concar Passage Mixed-Use Project i Final EIR City of San Mateo July 2020 SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document, together with the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), constitutes the Final SEIR for the Concar Passage Mixed-Use Project. PURPOSE OF THE FINAL EIR In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, this Final EIR provides objective information regarding the environmental consequences of the proposed project. The Final EIR also examines mitigation measures and alternatives to the project intended to reduce or eliminate significant environmental impacts. The Final SEIR is intended to be used by the City of San Mateo and any Responsible Agencies in making decisions regarding the project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15090(a), prior to approving a project, the lead agency shall certify that: (1) The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; (2) The Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the lead agency, and that the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR prior to approving the project; and (3) The Final EIR reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballot Measure Money, 2004
    T A K I N G T H E I N I T I A T I V E : B A L L O T M E A S U R E M O N E Y , 2 0 0 4 By T H E I N S T I T U T E O N M O N E Y I N S T A T E P O L I T I C S A P R I L 2 0 0 6 833 NORTH LAST CHANCE GULCH, SECOND FLOOR • HELENA, MT • 59601 PHONE 406-449-2480 • FAX 406-457-2091 • E-MAIL [email protected] www.followthemoney.org T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Overview .................................................................................................3 Methodology ................................................................................5 Gambling .................................................................................................6 Tort Laws on Trial ................................................................................. 25 Taking on Tobacco................................................................................. 44 Taking Aim at Hunting and Fishing........................................................ 51 Out of Time: Term Limit Extensions Fail............................................... 56 Appendix A: Ballot Measure Contributions by State .............................. 62 O V E R V I E W Across the country in the 2003 and 2004 elections, voters decided a plethora of issues brought directly to the ballot, ranging from whether gambling should be allowed or expanded to whether limits should be placed on lawsuits or on the definition of marriage. In 32 states, legislatures either placed referenda on the ballot or citizens took the initiative to place their own measures before voters. The result: voters across the country had the opportunity to approve or reject more than 130 proposals to change state laws or constitutions through the ballot process.
    [Show full text]
  • Eden Vol13 No2 2010
    Journal of the California Garden & Landscape History Society Vol. 13 No. 2 • Summer 2010 The Other McLaren: Part I Marlea Graham t is likely that my first awareness of John McLaren having had a son who I was involved in the nursery trade stemmed from finding an article on ―San Mateo County Nurseries‖ written by local historian Donald Ringler in 1972 for La Peninsula, the journal of the San Mateo His- torical Association.1 To the left of the title page, under the photograph of D.O. Mill‘s head gardener, a Scot named Laughlin McLain dressed in full Highland regalia, was this caption: ―Scottish gardeners seem to have been popular in early San Mateo days. One of John McLaren‘s assistants was William Brown who had been a gardener at Buckingham Palace. His home was on the site of present Bay Meadows [racetrack] and the Brown & MacRorie Nursery preceded the one in which McLaren‘s son was a partner (see Mr. Ringler‘s article).‖ This interesting statement was not touched on in Mr. Ringler‘s article, and the editor‘s name was not mentioned in the jour- nal. Ringler said only that ―Another prominent nursery of the early twentieth century was the MacRorie-McLaren Co. in San Mateo. Donald McLaren, the McLaren partner of the firm, was son of the noted John McLaren who planned Golden Gate Park. The nursery gained fame by erecting the first steel-frame commercial greenhouse on the Pacific Coast. It This family photograph was published in covered twenty thousand square feet.‖ Aikman's biography, Boss Gardener: The Life and Times of John McLaren (1988).
    [Show full text]
  • MIG's Scope of Work
    parkside at brisbane village precise plan City of BrisbaneCalifornia scope of work, budget and schedule City Council September 17, 2015 800 Hearst Avenue | Berkeley, CA 94710 510-845-7549 | www.migcom.com In association with: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. | Strategic Economics Table of Contents Project Understanding Section 1 Work Program Section 2 Project Staffing Section 3 Project Budget Section 4 Project Schedule Section 5 Statement of Qualifications Section 6 References Section 7 Resumes Appendix SECTION ONE 1 Project Understanding Project Understanding The Parkside at Brisbane Village area includes Nestled along the slopes of the San Bruno Mountains and approximately 25 acres of public and private properties overlooking San Francisco Bay, Brisbane is a distinct place strategically positioned between central Brisbane, Crocker committed to retaining its small-town quality amid Industrial Park and the primary gateway into Brisbane. The the busy urban landscape. Residents value the sense Parkside at Brisbane Village Precise Plan will: of community, cultural diversity, parks and open space, and mountain and ocean views, along with the natural • Lay the foundation for future private and public environment and resources that contribute to the cohesion investment; and character of this community of nearly 4,500 residents. • Provide guidance for the use of underutilized City-owned The City of Brisbane is taking definitive steps to enhance properties; its central core that serves as a community gathering • Beautify the physical appearance of the City entry; place, and to create new housing opportunities close to • Improve pedestrian and vehicular circulation; local shops and Community Park. Through preparation of the Parkside at Brisbane Village Precise Plan, the City will • Attain economic and design opportunities for the establish a clear vision and the zoning regulations that will Brisbane Village Shopping Center/bank site; and move that vision toward reality.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Utilities
    SECTION 4.8: UTILITIES 4.8 UTILITIES Introduction This section describes existing conditions (including regulations) relating to utilities occurring or potentially occurring in the Corridor Plan Area, and potential impacts to water supply, wastewater, and solid waste services that could occur with implementation of the Corridor Plan and the Bay Meadows Specific Plan Amendment (Bay Meadows project). Mitigation measures for any significant impacts are also identified. This assessment was prepared using information obtained from utility providers in the project area and published documents pertaining to the project area. Throughout the existing conditions section, discussion of the Corridor Plan Area includes the Bay Meadows project site. Therefore, the terms “project area” and “project location” refer to both the Corridor Plan Area and the Bay Meadows project site. However, a separate discussion of existing conditions and impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Bay Meadows project is provided. Existing Conditions Corridor Plan Area Water Supply California Water Service Company (Cal Water) The project area is within the City of San Mateo, which receives water service from the California Water Service Company (Cal Water). The City is within Cal Water’s Mid-Peninsula District, which serves more than 120,000 people in the cities of San Mateo and San Carlos, including over 31,000 residential and nearly 4,000 commercial connections. Within the Cal Water service area, single-family and multi-family residences account for 87.8 percent and 1.6 percent of water connections, respectively, and commercial connections total 9.3 percent. Industrial, government, and construction uses are small, at 1.3 percent (Cal Water, 2003b).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada, Reno Reno at the Races
    University of Nevada, Reno Reno at the Races: The Sporting Life versus Progressive Reform A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Emerson Marcus Dr. William D. Rowley/Thesis Advisor May 2015 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by EMERSON MARCUS Entitled Reno At The Races: Sporting Life Versus Progressive Reform be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS William D. Rowley, Ph.D., Advisor Elizabeth Raymond, Ph.D., Committee Member Greta de Jong, Ph.D., Committee Member Alicia Barber, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School May, 2015 i Abstract The thesis examines horse race betting in the state of Nevada from 1915 to 1931 and how two opposing forces — sporting life and progressive reform — converged as state lawmakers passed progressive gambling legislation. While maybe not a catalyst, this legislation began Nevada’s slippery slope to becoming a wide-open gambling state. It examines how the acceptance of horse race betting opened the door for more ambitious forms of gambling while other states eventually followed Nevada’s lead and passed similar horse race betting law during the Great Depression. While other western states followed suit and legalized horse race betting during the Great Depression, month-long race meetings in Reno disbanded, as Nevada opened itself to wide-open gambling. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgments iii I. Introduction 1 II. Gamblers, Turfites, Sports in a Changing State 8 From the Shadow of the Comstock 13 Crisis on the Turf 24 A True Sport 33 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Racing Performance in the American Quarter Horse Samuel T
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1987 Genetics of racing performance in the American Quarter Horse Samuel T. Buttram Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Biostatistics Commons Recommended Citation Buttram, Samuel T., "Genetics of racing performance in the American Quarter Horse " (1987). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 11670. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/11670 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17"x 23" black and white photographic print.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeders' Awards and the Gambler's Corner Solution James Ahern And
    Breeders’ Awards and the Gambler’s Corner Solution James Ahern and Jay E. Noel1 Paper presented at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Meeting Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 29-July1, 2000 Copyright 2000 by James Ahern and Jay E. Noel. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appear on all such copies. 1 James Ahern and Jay E. Noel are Professors in the Agribusiness Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. Contact person: James Ahern at [email protected]. Thanks are given to the California Thoroughbred Breeders Association for providing data and funding for this research. California has had a Thoroughbred breeders awards program since 1933. The intent of the program is to encourage the production of Thoroughbred horses and provide an incentive for that production. The program rewards breeders of horses, stallion owners, and owners of registered California bred (CB) horses. Many Thoroughbred racing states encourage the production of racing animals by incentives to producers or breeders of potential racehorses. California horse racing was reintroduced after a legal ban in 1933 by ballot initiative with a declared intent (§19401 (b)) of “encouragement of agriculture and the breeding of horses” (Deerings California Codes). At that time the state introduced a breeders’ (mare owners) incentive program for winning horses at what is now a relatively low rate, equivalent to 3% of the winner’s purse. State statutes say that was implemented to fulfill the encouragement part of the law (California Statutes, 1933).
    [Show full text]
  • Erin Murphy's Research Shoots Holes in Our Hopes for High-Tech Evidence
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, ScHOOL OF LAW SPRING 2008 VOL. 40, NO. 1 PLUS: JESS JACKSON RIDES AGAIN High-stakes horse racing and reform with Boalt’s most famous vintner. 34 Is DNA BULLISH IN CHINA A Boalt think tank gets down to business in China’s supercharged Bulletproof? private equity market. 18 DATA THEFT Erin Murphy’s research How a Boalt professor helped shoots holes in our hopes a Boalt alumnus raise the privacy for high-tech evidence. PAGE 28 protection bar. 22 TRANSCRIPT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, UPDATE YOUR ADDRESS COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING Email: [email protected] Sybil Wyatt Web: www.law.berkeley.edu/alumni/updates EDITOR Phone: 510.642.1832 Jared Simpson U.S. Mail: SENIOR STAFF WRITER University of California, Berkeley Andrew Cohen School of Law 2000 Center Street, Suite 400 ASSISTANT EDITOR Berkeley, CA 94704-7220 Colleen Raspberry CONTRIBUTORS VISIT WWW.LAW.BERKELEY.EDU Jon Jefferson John Birdsall Fred Sandsmark Transcript is published by the University Jeff Bleich ’89 Kara Platoni Colleen Raspberry Bonnie Azab Powell of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Communications & Marketing Department. CONTRIBUTING ARTISTS ORIGINAL DESIGN BY Jim Block Kevin Irby Arno Ghelfi, © 2008 Regents of the University of California. Bart Nagel Randy Pollak l’atelier Starno All rights reserved. TRANSCRIPT SPRING 2008 VOL. 40 CONTENTS NO. 1 FEATURES Bullish in China . 1. 8 Boalt’s business law think tank has partnered with China insider Howard Chao ’80 to tackle the country’s nascent public equity market . By Fred Sandsmark Into the Breach . 22. How a word to the wise from a Boalt expert to a Boalt alumnus altered the cybersecurity landscape .
    [Show full text]
  • Saudis Not Ready to Pay Maximum Security=S
    TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 2020 SANDIN OUT TO A FLYER WITH PICO D=ORO SAUDIS NOT READY TO PAY by Jessica Martini MAXIMUM SECURITY=S Gerry Sandin, who grew up near Bay Meadows Racetrack and played Little League with future trainer Bill Morey, always knew CONNECTIONS he wanted to own racehorses one day. The California native finally made the dream a reality when he purchased a son of Curlin at the OBS March 2-Year-Olds in Training Sale this year and he was cheering the colt on from his Bay Area home when Pico d=Oro became his first winner while breaking his maiden in stakes company in the Runhappy Juvenile S. at Ellis Park Sunday. AThat was my first win and it happened to be a stakes win,@ Sandin, a global operations manager for Apple, said while still savoring the victory Monday afternoon. AIt was a pleasant surprise--I was on a high for the second half of Sunday, it was tough to go to sleep last night.@ Sandin traces his love of racing back some three decades to time spent at Bay Meadows as a kid. Cont. p3 IN TDN EUROPE TODAY Maximum Security | Jockey Club of Saudi Arabia GOFFS ORBY YEARLING CATALOGUE OUT by Bill Finley The catalogue for the 2020 Goffs Orby Yearling Sale has been The Jockey Club of Saudi Arabia (JCSA) announced Monday released. Click or tap here to go straight to TDN Europe. that it will continue to withhold payment from the $20-million Saudi Cup to the connections of Maximum Security (New Year=s Day) as it continues to investigate the circumstances surrounding the horse and former trainer Jason Servis.
    [Show full text]
  • City of San Mateo Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site
    2016 Qualifications City of San Mateo Request for Request for Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site RFQ City of San Mateo 330 W. 20th Ave. San Mateo, CA 94403 (650) 522-7223 This page left intentionally blank City of San Mateo Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site Summary of Request for Qualifications The City of San Mateo (“City”) is seeking qualified and experienced developers to develop the City-owned 1 acre property (“Property”) located at the northeastern corner of Delaware Street and 28th Avenue, as affordable multi-family rental housing units. The property is located in the Bay Meadows Phase II Specific Plan Amendment area, which consists of 83 acres master planned to include a mixed use transit oriented development including approximately 1,066 residential units, 750,000 square feet of class A office space, and 93,000 square feet other commercial/retail, as well as 15 acres of new public parks and three acres of other privately owned open space consisting of pedestrian corridors and a town square. The City seeks a developer who is experienced, financially creative and capable of developing and managing quality affordable family rental housing. This Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) contains the City’s objectives for the property and development parameters, instructions governing the submittals, the requirements to be eligible for consideration, general evaluation criteria, and other requirements to be met by each submittal. This RFQ is a solicitation of competitive submittals that best serves the
    [Show full text]