Fossil Fool Bulletin 1:29 • 19 June 2018Fool

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fossil Fool Bulletin 1:29 • 19 June 2018Fool SPONSORED BY Page 1 Fossil • Fossil Fool Bulletin 1:29 • 19 June 2018Fool KNITTING NANNAS AGAINST GAS Bulletin Fossil fools in the spotlight this week: A resource for people working to end the fossil fuel era in Australia Published by Eve Sinton • [email protected] FFB 1:29 • 19 JUNE 2018 Debunked: report exposes myth of gas as a clean transition fuel By Matt Maiorana & FFB tion and consumption can deliver a transition A new report report, ‘Debunked: to a cleaner energy sys- The G20 Clean Gas Myth’ focuses on tem has centred around fossil gas development in the G20 the issue of methane and debunking the myth of fossil gas leakage. Methane, the as a clean transition fuel. The report primary hydrocarbon finds that the concept of fossil gas as contained in fossil gas, is a “bridge fuel” to a stable climate is a highly potent green- a myth. Emissions from existing gas house gas (GHG) when fields, alongside existing oil and coal vented or leaked to the development, already exceed car- atmosphere. bon budgets aligned with the Paris Agreement. Studies have found that methane leakage Even if all coal mines were shut levels can be much down tomorrow, the gas and oil in higher for gas produced via fracking than for take the world beyond the carbon bud- conventionally produced already-developedget for a 50% chance fields at staying alone would below gas. If elevated levels of 1.5ºC of global warming. methane are leaked in Despite this reality, G20 countries are the process of producing projected to host investment of over and delivering fossil gas US$1.6 trillion in new gas projects to consumers, then its by 2030. If this happens, emissions emissions advantage unlocked through 2050 would make it over coal for power generation or other uses the Paris Agreement, which has been is reduced or negated, extremelysigned by alldifficult G20 members. to meet the goals of and the bridge fuel idea is mistaken. Australia among top five offenders to power the plants that chill the gas LNG export: Making a bad problem worse Five countries – the United States, Rus- estimated that six to ten percent of the sia, Australia, China, and Canada – are intogas processed LNG. Where is requiredfossil gas for is used, powering it is projected to be responsible for 75% of gas that is cooled to -162 degrees to the plant. There is also energy re- capital expenditures in gas production Liquifiedreduce volume Natural and Gas facilitate (LNG) is shipping fossil in G20 countries from 2018-2030. As shale gas production has grown – quiredamount for to shippingthe full lifecycle and regasification. emissions across oceans. On arrival the liquefied So,of producing the LNG process and using adds fossil a significant gas. enabled by the development of hydrau- gasdestination. is generally regasified to be further lic fracturing (fracking) and horizontal transported by pipeline to its final If methane leakage is not kept at very drilling – much of the controversy over As might be expected, this intense low levels – well below 2 percent, whether increased fossil gas produc- process requires a lot of energy. Elec- tricity and fossil gas are generally used • Continued p2 • P 2: Adani wants • P 3: Govt reports that • P 4: Inside 10bn litres of water mining dries out Hunter the news Page 2 • Fossil Fool Bulletin 1:29 • 19 June 2018 Debunked: dangerous Adani: 10 billion litres of Suttor transitional fuel myth • Continued from p1 River water up for grabs, no EIS depending on shipping distance and may result in increased GHG emis- othersions. factors – replacing coal with LNG New gas locks in emissions The problem with building a lot of new fossil gas capacity is that the companies investing in gas infrastruc- ture expect to operate their plants for decades to come. Power plants and re- lated infrastructure like pipelines and investments that require decades of LNG terminals are multibillion-dollar investing today expects to retire the Plans by Adani to avoid a full Federal of the surrounding region of Central operationinfrastructure to turn earlier a profit. than Nobody 30 years environmental impact assessment Queensland is in drought. of their plans to take 10 billion litres into its lifetime at minimum, while “Adani are saying this take of water of river water in Central Queensland many power plants operate for much is not part of a large scale coal mining are dangerous, and undermine Fed- longer. This means that gas plants built project, which is absurd, and should be eral environment laws. over the next few years could still be slapped down by the Federal Environ- operating beyond 2050, when emis- Adani recently submitted a referral ment Minister who should demand a sions from the power sector must be under the Federal Environment Pro- full environmental impact statement. nearing zero. tection and Biodiversity Conservation The myth of fossil gas as a “bridge” to Federal water trigger undermined a stable climate does not stand up to Scheme which will extract 10 billion Actlitres 1999 of water for the from North the GalileeSuttor RiverWater to “This move by Adani will also under- run the Carmichael coal mine. mine the Federal water trigger and date has focused on methane leakage, allow other mining companies to fol- scrutiny.the data showsWhile muchthat the of GHGthe debate emissions to In its referral, Adani claims that the low suit and take and use river water just from burning the fossil gas itself scheme is not captured by the Federal without proper Federal environment are enough to overshoot climate goals. water trigger and says that it is not assessment. a controlled action, which means it “This is yet another example of Adani rather than increase it, and the fact would not require an Environmental Impact Statement. making things up as they go along - Wethat must methane reduce leakage fossil willgas combustionnever be they got approval for a huge coal mine reduced to zero only makes this task Carmel Flint, spokesperson for Lock without knowing where they were more urgent. the Gate Alliance said “Adani is trying going to get their water from, and are This report is one of two published to sneak through a massive 10 billion now trying to push through their wa- simultaneously that question the litre water scheme, including a dam ter plan without any transparency. and pipeline, without a full environ- ongoing push for expanding fossil gas “Adani is also suggesting that it will production in G20 countries. mental impact assessment under Federal environment laws. make water available to other Galilee It was produced by: Oil Change Interna- Basin coal mines from the scheme in tional in collaboration with African Climate “If the Federal Minister approves this, the future, which suggests that they it will be yet another special deal for might triple the amount of water taken Movement on Debt & Development, Christian Adani that hangs Queensland farmers, - all without any proper assessment or Reality Project, Amazon Watch, Asian Peoples’ local communities and the environ- public consultation” she said. HealthAid, Earthworks, of Mother Engajamundo,Earth Foundation, Food Leave & Water it ment out to dry, at a time when most inEurope, the Ground Food & Initiative, Water Watch, Legambiente, Greenpeace, Obser - vatori del Deute en la Globalització, Platform, Dr Wayne Somerville is well known in the Northern Rivers, earth, UK Youth Climate Coalition, urgewald, and NSW, for his involvement with the Bentley Blockade. 350.org.Rainforest Action Network, Re:Common, Stand. His new book, Shallow Thought, Deep Mind: What The report can be downloaded here: you need to succeed, thrive and make the world http://priceofoil.org/2018/06/11/debunked-g20-clean-gas- myth/ better, is for everyone who takes on life’s challenges and dreams of brighter tomorrows. The partner report, ‘Debunked: The The book can be purchased from website Promise of Argentina’s Vaca Muerta www.drwaynesomerville.com for $24.99 which includes Shale Play postage anywhere in Australia and GST. The e-book version is http://priceofoil.org/debunked-vaca-muerta available on Amazon. An audio book is coming. ,’ is available at: Page 23 • Fossil Fool Bulletin 1:29 • 19 June 2018 Government report: massive water drawdown from mining could affect up to 30% of the Hunter region The Commonwealth government has released its Hunter Bioregional Assessment, revealing that 25% of the Hunter could already have been affected by groundwater drawdown caused by mining. Another 5% of the region is likely to be affected if proposed new mines proceed. The report also indicates that there has been impacts on river systems, particularly in the Goulburn River catchment, and reveal the extensive impact that the Bylong coal mine would have on groundwater if it was approved. Lock the Gate Alliance spokesperson shows that a massive area of the GeorginaHunter Valley Woods is experiencing said, “This report negative impacts from coal mining with almost 25% of the region potentially already affected by groundwater drawdown from mining. “This represents a risk to agriculture in the region, and is even more con- cerning during a drought like the one we are experiencing at present when farmers are under pressure already and reliant on groundwater. New mines, expansions proposed “The report shows that the 17 pro- posed new mines and expansions in the region will only make things worse never be allowed in the Bylong Valley very likely (greater than 95% chance) for our groundwater, with water losses - to occur at distances of 5km from mine expected in the Singleton, Muswell- ment to acknowledge this new infor- sites. andmation we’re and calling reject on the the mine.” NSW Govern The Bioregional Assessment reveals brook and Jerry’s water sources.” that the groundwater drawdown from Highlights from the report •water Water sources.
Recommended publications
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metung Urban Design Framework
    METUNG URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK COASTAL TOWNS DESIGN FRAMEWORK VOLUME 3 MARCH 2007 Copyright © Meinhardt Infrastructure & Environment Pty Ltd 2007 Disclaimer Information in this document is current as of March 2007. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing the document, Meinhardt accepts no liability for loss or damages incurred as a result of reliance placed upon its content. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Meinhardt. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................1 2. PROJECT SCOPE AND APPROACH ..............................................2 3. SETTLEMENT STUDY AREA ..........................................................5 3.1 REGIONAL INFLUENCES ................................................................5 3.2 SETTLEMENT DESCRIPTION .........................................................6 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................12 4.1 STATE / REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ........................................12 4.2 EAST GIPPSLAND PLANNING SCHEME ........................................15 4.3 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ............................................................18 5. COMMUNITY VIEWS ........................................................................19 5.1 CONSULTATION PROGRAM ............................................................19 5.2 KEY MATTERS FROM COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ..........................20 6. URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK PRINCIPLES
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Climate Change Publics: Cultivating Sustainability and Justice in the Pioneer Valley
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses November 2015 Emerging Climate Change Publics: Cultivating Sustainability and Justice in the Pioneer Valley Vanessa Adel University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Adel, Vanessa, "Emerging Climate Change Publics: Cultivating Sustainability and Justice in the Pioneer Valley" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 489. https://doi.org/10.7275/7499596.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/489 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EMERGING CLIMATE CHANGE PUBLICS: CULTIVATING SUSTAINABILITY AND JUSTICE IN THE PIONEER VALLEY A Dissertation Presented by VANESSA ADEL Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2015 Department of Sociology © Copyright by Vanessa Adel 2015 All Rights Reserved Emerging Green Publics: Cultivating Sustainability and Justice in the Pioneer Valley A Dissertation Presented By VANESSA ADEL Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________________ Millie Thayer, Chair _______________________________________________ Joya Misra, Member _______________________________________________ Leslie King, Member ______________________________ Michelle Budig, Chair Department of Sociology DEDICATION To my children. For a better future. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you Millie Thayer, the chair of my dissertation committee. I am so honored and humbled to have been your student. Thank you for your always thoughtful and provocative comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Mallacoota Urban Design Framework
    MALLACOOTA URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK COASTAL TOWNS DESIGN FRAMEWORK VOLUME 3 MARCH 2007 Copyright © Meinhardt Infrastructure & Environment Pty Ltd 2007 Disclaimer Information in this document is current as of March 2007. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing the document, Meinhardt accepts no liability for loss or damages incurred as a result of reliance placed upon its content. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Meinhardt. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................1 2. PROJECT SCOPE AND APPROACH ..............................................2 3. SETTLEMENT STUDY AREA ..........................................................5 3.1 REGIONAL INFLUENCES ................................................................5 3.2 SETTLEMENT DESCRIPTION .........................................................6 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................12 4.1 STATE / REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ........................................12 4.2 EAST GIPPSLAND PLANNING SCHEME ........................................15 4.3 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ............................................................18 5. COMMUNITY VIEWS ........................................................................19 5.1 CONSULTATION PROGRAM ............................................................19 5.2 KEY MATTERS FROM COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ..........................21 6. URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK PRINCIPLES
    [Show full text]
  • TCC Policy Manual 2021
    Tatura Children’s Centre Policy Manual 2021 “Tatura Children’s Centre acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land on which we work and live and recognise their continuing connection to lands, waters and the Community. We pay respect to Elders, past, present and emerging” Tatura Children’s Centre is a child safe organisation and is commited to the safety of all children and young people. We have zero tolerance for child abuse and aim to provide a safe, supportive and welcoming environment where all children can flourish. TABLE OF CONTENTS POLICY Page NQS Nat Law Nat Reg TCC Philosophy 6-7 7.2.1 QA 7- SERVICE MANAGEMENT 8 Background Information 9 6,7 173 Hours of operation and Services provided 10 6,7 173 Media 11-12 6,7 Governance- TCC Committee of Management 13-18 7.3 161, 174 118, 117A- Determining the Responsible person\Nominated supervisors 117C, 150 present, TCC’S Educational Leader appointment and assessment of criminal histories QA1- EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM & PRACTICE 19 168 73-76 National Quality Framework Overview- Q.I.P 20 6,7 168 73-76, 254 TCC’s Early Childhood Curriculum and Routines 21 1-7 168 73-76 QA 5- ACCESS TO CARE 22 157 Confidentiality, Privacy and Records 23-24 7.3 175 181-183 Priority of Access 25 6,7 84, 157,183 Social Justice- Inclusion, equity, reducing discrimination 26 1 Enrolment process for families 27 6.1 175 158, 161, 162, 177 Waiting List 28 6 Review of Care – Non working parents 29 6 Orientation process for families 30 6.1 QA 7- FEES- SERVICE MANAGEMENT 31 Collection of Fees 32 7.3 Child Care Subsidy
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION TUESDAY, 2 FEBRUARY 2021 hansard.parliament.vic.gov.au By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable LINDA DESSAU, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable KEN LAY, AO, APM The ministry Premier........................................................ The Hon. DM Andrews, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Education and Minister for Mental Health .. The Hon. JA Merlino, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Resources ....................... The Hon. J Symes, MLC Minister for Transport Infrastructure and Minister for the Suburban Rail Loop ....................................................... The Hon. JM Allan, MP Minister for Training and Skills and Minister for Higher Education .... The Hon. GA Tierney, MLC Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development and Minister for Industrial Relations ........................................... The Hon. TH Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Roads and Road Safety . The Hon. BA Carroll, MP Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change and Minister for Solar Homes ................................................ The Hon. L D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Child Protection and Minister for Disability, Ageing and Carers ...................................................... The Hon. LA Donnellan, MP Minister for Health, Minister for Ambulance Services and Minister for Equality .................................................... The Hon. MP
    [Show full text]
  • Croajingolong National Park Management Plan
    National Parks Service Croajingolong National Park Management Plan June 1996 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT This Management Plan for Croajingolong National Park is approved for implementation. Its purpose is to direct all aspects of management in the Park until the Plan is reviewed. A Draft Management Plan was published in June 1993. A total of 36 submissions were received. Copies of the Plan can be obtained from: Cann River Information Centre Department of Natural Resources and Environment Princes Highway CANN RIVER VIC 3809 Information Centre Department of Natural Resources and Environment 240 Victoria Parade EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Further information on this Plan can be obtained from the NRE Cann River office (051) 586 370. CROAJINGOLONG NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN National Parks Service DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT VICTORIA JUNE 1996 ã Crown (State of Victoria) 1996 A Victorian Government Publication This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1986. Published June 1996 by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Victoria. National Parks Service. Croajingolong National Park management plan. Bibliography. ISBN 0 7306 6137 7. 1. Croajingolong National Park (Vic.). 2. National parks and reserves - Victoria - Gippsland - Management. I. Victoria. Dept of Natural Resources and Environment. II. Title. 333.783099456 Note: In April 1996 the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (CNR) became part of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). Cover: Looking east from Rame Head (photograph K.
    [Show full text]
  • Paynesville Report.Indd
    PAYNESVILLE URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK COASTAL TOWNS DESIGN FRAMEWORK VOLUME 3 MARCH 2007 Copyright © Meinhardt Infrastructure & Environment Pty Ltd 2007 Disclaimer Information in this document is current as of March 2007. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing the document, Meinhardt accepts no liability for loss or damages incurred as a result of reliance placed upon its content. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Meinhardt. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................1 2. PROJECT SCOPE AND APPROACH ..............................................2 3. SETTLEMENT STUDY AREA ..........................................................5 3.1 REGIONAL INFLUENCES ................................................................5 3.2 SETTLEMENT DESCRIPTION .........................................................7 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................14 4.1 STATE / REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ........................................14 4.2 EAST GIPPSLAND PLANNING SCHEME ........................................17 4.3 PREVIOUS STRATEGIC PLANNING STUDIES ...............................21 4.4 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ............................................................24 5. COMMUNITY VIEWS ........................................................................26 5.1 CONSULTATION PROGRAM ............................................................26 5.2 KEY MATTERS FROM COMMUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • East Gippsland Shire Council Submission Page 1 of 24 Table of Contents
    Submission to Parliament of Victoria – Economic and Infrastructure Committee INQUIRY INTO ISSUES RELATING TO LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES IN VICTORIA September 2012 (note: submission extension granted) East Gippsland Shire Council Submission Page 1 of 24 Table of Contents PURPOSE .......................................................................................................4 CONTEXT........................................................................................................4 CONTRIBUTIONS ...........................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................5 LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS BEING CARRIED OUT6 East Gippsland Shire Council Investment in Economic Development ......6 East Gippsland Economic Development Discretionary Fund....................7 East Gippsland Economic Development Advisory Board .........................7 Agreements and Partnerships ..................................................................7 APPROPRIATE ROLE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN GENERATING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW THE ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THIS AREA WITH THE STATE GOVERNMENT; .......8 East Gippsland Economic Development Strategic Plan ...........................8 Supporting Small Business.......................................................................9 EXAMINE WHETHER THE ROLE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN RURAL AND REGIONAL AREAS HAS DIFFERENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASKS TO
    [Show full text]
  • East Gippsland Shire Council’S Submission in Regard to the Above Matter
    Contact: Fiona Weigall Telephone No: (03) 51539500 Email: [email protected] 24 August 2011 Ms Yuki Simmonds Executive Officer Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee Parliament House Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Dear Ms Simmonds Re: Submission – Inquiry into Greenfields Mineral Exploration and Project Development in Victoria Please find enclosed East Gippsland Shire Council’s submission in regard to the above matter. Council wishes to thank you for the opportunity to submit comments and appreciates the extension of time granted to do so. Should you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact Fiona Weigall, Manager Major Projects and Economic Development on 03 5153 9500. Yours sincerely STEVE KOZLOWSKI Chief Executive Officer Enc: Submission to Parliament of Victoria Economic Development & Infrastructure Committee INQUIRY INTO THE BENEFITS AND DRIVERS OF GREENFIELDS MINERAL EXPLORATION AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IN VICTORIA August 2011 Contents 1 Purpose ...........................................................................................................................................3 2 Context ............................................................................................................................................3 3 Scope of East Gippsland Shire Council’s response to the inquiry:........................................4 3.1 East Gippsland Overview ..................................................................................................4 3.2 The East Gippsland Economy
    [Show full text]
  • East Gippsland
    EAST GIPPSLAND NEW FORMAT PLANNING SCHEME REPORT OF THE PANEL AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 1998 EAST GIPPSLAND NEW FORMAT PLANNING SCHEME REPORT OF THE PANEL AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAY ROOKE (CHAIR) ELIZABETH JACKA BRIAN HARPER NOVEMBER 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Panel............................................................................................. 1 2. STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Profile of the Shire ............................................................................. 3 2.2 Strategic Issues................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 Community Needs and Development................................. 5 2.2.2 Economic Activity, Employment and Access ..................... 6 2.2.3 Conservation and Natural Resources .................................. 7 2.2.4 Future Land Use and Development..................................... 8 3. RESPONSE TO THE TERMS OF REFERENCE...................................................... 9 3.1 Consistency......................................................................................... 9 3.2 Municipal Strategic Statement....................................................... 11 3.3 Local Planning Policy Framework ................................................ 15 3.4 Zones, Overlays and Schedules....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Coastal Council VCC Annual Report 2017 18
    Victorian Coastal Council Annual Report 2017–18 Published by the Victorian Coastal Council 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, 3002, Victoria July 2018 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Melbourne 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Victorian Coastal Council logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Impact Digital Pty Ltd, Brunswick, VIC 3056 ISSN 1327-659X ISSN 2203-9414 (Online) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone DELWP Customer Service Centre 136 186, email customer. [email protected], via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.vcc.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Photo Acknowledgements VCC, DELWP, Coastcare Victoria and Sue Raverty. Contact Victorian Coastal Council office for further information.
    [Show full text]