Referendum Campaign Broadcasts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Referendum Campaign Broadcasts Ymgynghoriad ar y meini prawf dyrannu arfaethedig ar gyfer Darllediadau Etholiadol y Pleidiau 2015 Canlyniad yr Ymgynghoriad Chwefror 2015 Sicrhau bod pawb sy'n talu ffi'r drwydded yn cael y gorau o'r BBC bbc.co.uk/bbctrust Canlyniadau'r ymgynghoriad Cefndir Mae’n ofynnol i’r BBC, o dan delerau Siarter a Chytundeb 2006, sicrhau bod materion gwleidyddol dadleuol a materion sy’n ymwneud â pholisi cyhoeddus yn cael sylw diduedd. Cynhelir yr etholiadau canlynol ar 7 Mai 2015: - yr Etholiad Cyffredinol - etholiadau llywodraeth leol Lloegr (gan gynnwys etholiadau maer) Cyn yr etholiadau, bydd y BBC yn cyhoeddi'r meini prawf y bydd yn eu defnyddio i ddyrannu Darllediadau Etholiadol y Pleidiau (DEPau) yng nghyswllt yr etholiadau hyn. Y meini prawf Caiff y meini prawf eu datblygu gan Weithrediaeth y BBC ac fe'u cyflwynir i'r Ymddiriedolaeth i gael eu cymeradwyo. Ymddiriedolaeth y BBC yw corff llywodraethol y BBC. Mae'n gorff ar wahân i Weithrediaeth y BBC, ac yn annibynnol arno. Gweithrediaeth y BBC sy'n gyfrifol am reoli'r BBC o ddydd i ddydd. Yr Ymddiriedolaeth hefyd yw'r corff apelio terfynol ym mhroses cwynion y BBC. Mae'r Ymddiriedolaeth wedi dirprwyo awdurdod i'r Pwyllgor Safonau Golygyddol ("y Pwyllgor") ar gyfer cymeradwyo meini prawf dyrannu DEP y Pwyllgor1. Roedd y meini prawf drafft a luniwyd gan y BBC ar gyfer yr etholiadau hyn fel a ganlyn: Darllediadau Etholiadol y Pleidiau - meini prawf dyrannu Etholiad Cyffredinol 2015 ac Etholiadau Lleol (Lloegr) Yr Etholiad Cyffredinol Gwasanaethau’r BBC sy’n cynnwys Darllediadau Etholiadol y Pleidiau: Bydd DEPau yn cael eu darlledu yn y wlad berthnasol ar: BBC One a BBC Two, BBC Radio Scotland, BBC Radio Nan Gaidheal (sy'n darlledu yn yr iaith Aeleg), BBC Radio Wales, BBC Radio Cymru (sy’n darlledu yn yr iaith Gymraeg) a BBC Radio Ulster. Meini Prawf Trothwy ar gyfer DEPau Bydd plaid wleidyddol gofrestredig sydd ag ymgeiswyr yn sefyll mewn o leiaf un o bob chwech o’r seddau sy’n cael eu hymladd mewn etholiad mewn gwlad yn gymwys i gael un darllediad gwleidyddol yn y wlad honno. 1 http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/about/how_we_operate/committees/2014/ esc_tor.pdf Felly: yn Lloegr, bydd plaid wleidyddol yn gymwys i gael un DEP os bydd ganddi ymgeisydd mewn lleiafswm o 89 o seddau. yn yr Alban, bydd plaid wleidyddol yn gymwys i gael un DEP os bydd ganddi ymgeisydd mewn lleiafswm o 10 o seddau. yng Nghymru, bydd plaid wleidyddol yn gymwys i gael un DEP os bydd ganddi ymgeisydd mewn lleiafswm o 7 o seddau. yng Ngogledd Iwerddon, bydd plaid wleidyddol yn gymwys i gael un DEP os bydd ganddi ymgeisydd mewn lleiafswm o 3 o seddau. Meini Prawf ar gyfer DEPau Ychwanegol Efallai y bydd plaid wleidyddol gofrestredig sy’n bodloni'r maen prawf trothwy yn gymwys i gael un neu ragor o ddarllediadau gwleidyddol ychwanegol mewn gwlad os gall ddangos y bu ganddi neu fod ganddi lefelau sylweddol o gefnogaeth ymysg etholwyr yn y wlad honno. Etholiadau Cyffredinol, 7 Mai 2015 Ni fydd darllediadau gwleidyddol ar wahân ar gyfer etholiadau lleol. Y Comisiwn Etholiadol Fel sy’n ofynnol dan adran 11(3) o Ddeddf Pleidiau Gwleidyddol, Etholiadau Refferenda 2000, cafodd y meini prawf drafft ar gyfer dyrannu DEPau eu hanfon at y Comisiwn Etholiadol am sylwadau. Nododd y Comisiwn: "Mae'n ymddangos bod y dull hwn yn gyson â'r dull sydd wedi'i ddefnyddio yn y gorffennol" a chadarnhaodd nad oedd wedi canfod unrhyw faterion y byddai'n awgrymu eu newid. Fe wnaeth y Pwyllgor gadw barn y Comisiwn Etholiadol mewn cof wrth ystyried y meini prawf. Yr Ymgynghoriad Ar 04 Tachwedd 2014, cyhoeddodd yr Ymddiriedolaeth ei hymgynghoriad ar feini prawf dyrannu arfaethedig y Bwrdd Gweithredol ar gyfer DEPau. Roedd dogfen ymgynghori’r Ymddiriedolaeth yn gofyn y ddau gwestiwn isod: • A yw meini prawf dyrannu arfaethedig Darllediad Etholiadol y Pleidiau yn briodol yn eich barn chi? Esboniwch pam. • A oes gennych chi unrhyw sylwadau eraill am feini prawf dyrannu arfaethedig Darllediad Etholiadol y Pleidiau? Ymgynghoriad Ymddiriedolaeth y BBC tudalen 2 Ymatebion Cafodd yr Ymddiriedolaeth 61 ymateb i'r ymgynghoriad, ac roedd 58 ohonynt gan unigolion. Roedd y tri arall gan y sefydliadau canlynol: • Y Gymdeithas Ddemocrataidd • Y Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol • Mebyon Kernow / The Party for Cornwall Edrychwch ar Atodiad 1 i weld ymatebion y sefydliadau hyn. Cyn gwneud penderfyniad ynghylch meini prawf arfaethedig y Bwrdd Gweithredol, fe wnaeth y Pwyllgor ystyried yr holl ymatebion i’r ymgynghoriad a phwyso a mesur yr holl bwyntiau perthnasol a godwyd. Ystyriodd hefyd yr esboniadau a gafodd gan y Bwrdd Gweithredol ynglŷn â nifer o bwyntiau. Ceir crynodeb isod o’r prif bwyntiau a godwyd yn ymatebion yr ymgynghoriad, ynghyd â sylwadau’r Bwrdd Gweithredol a phenderfyniad y Pwyllgor. Ymatebion ynghylch diffiniad o 'lefelau sylweddol' o gefnogaeth Mae'r meini prawf drafft yn cynnwys "maen prawf ychwanegol" sy'n nodi y bydd pleidiau gwleidyddol sy'n bodloni'r "maen prawf trothwy' yn gymwys i gael un DEP neu fwy os gallant ddangos "lefelau sylweddol o gefnogaeth etholiadol yn y gorffennol a / neu’r presennol". Roedd deg o'r ymatebion i'r ymgynghoriad wedi nodi bod angen esbonio'r term "lefelau sylweddol" yn well. Disgrifiodd un unigolyn y geiriad presennol fel un "rhy amwys i fod yn ddefnyddiol." Disgrifiodd y Gymdeithas Ddemocrataidd y maen prawf ychwanegol fel un "gwan iawn ac yn agored i'w ddehongli." Honnodd ymateb arall nad oedd yn glir faint fyddai uchafswm nifer y DEPau ychwanegol. Gofynnodd sawl ymateb a fyddai modd nodi rhifau yn y meini prawf. Safbwynt y Bwrdd Gweithredol mewn ymateb i'r pryder hwn oedd y byddai unrhyw ymgais i osod diffiniadau llym neu fformiwla fathemategol ar gyfer pob maen prawf yn peri'r risg o gyfyngu ar allu'r BBC i wneud penderfyniadau priodol o ran newidiadau mewn amgylchiadau gwleidyddol na fyddai modd eu rhagweld ar adegau. Nododd y Bwrdd Gweithredol hefyd fod y term "lefelau sylweddol o gefnogaeth etholiadol" wedi hen ennill ei blwyf a fod y rheini sy’n gymwys i gael DEP yn ei ddeall. Ymgynghoriad Ymddiriedolaeth y BBC tudalen 3 Penderfyniad y Pwyllgor Roedd y Pwyllgor yn sylweddoli pwysigrwydd tegwch a thryloywder wrth roi'r maen prawf dyrannu ar waith. Roedd y Pwyllgor hefyd yn sylweddoli, ac ystyried natur hyblyg y cyd-destun gwleidyddol, ei bod yn hollbwysig caniatáu lefelau priodol o hyblygrwydd i'r Pwyllgor Gweithredol, yn ogystal â rhoi meini prawf ar waith y byddai modd eu haddasu yn y cyd-destun hwnnw. Ac ystyried yr holl dystiolaeth ac ymatebion, daeth y Pwyllgor i’r casgliad bod y term "lefelau sylweddol" o gefnogaeth etholiadol wedi hen ennill ei blwyf a’i fod yn cael ei ddeall gan y rheini sy’n gymwys i gael Darllediad Etholiadol y Pleidiau a’i bod yn briodol mabwysiadu’r maen prawf hwn mewn perthynas â'r etholiadau hyn. Ystyriodd y Pwyllgor p'un ai a ddylid nodi uchafswm nifer y DEPau posibl yn y meini prawf ond derbyniwyd nad oedd hyn yn ymarferol o ganlyniad i ystod o ffactorau perthnasol, megis ym mha wlad y byddai'r DEP yn cael ei ddarlledu, nifer y pleidiau sy'n gymwys i gael DEPau yn y wlad honno, yn ogystal â nifer y slotiau trawsyrru a'r dyddiau darlledu sydd ar gael. Ymatebion ynghylch Mebyon Kernow/Party for Cornwall Cafwyd 6 cyfrannwr ar y mater hwn, gan gynnwys y blaid ei hun ac un person a nododd ei fod yn aelod o'r blaid. Cyflwynodd y blaid y pwyntiau canlynol: a) mae'r meini prawf trothwy ar gyfer cyflwyno ymgeiswyr yn un o bob chwech o’r seddau sy'n cael eu hymladd mewn etholiad mewn gwlad yn annheg, yn hurt ac yn annemocrataidd gan fod hyn yn mynnu bod yn rhaid i Mebyon Kernow gyflwyno ymgeisydd nid yn unig yn y chwe sedd yn rhanbarth Cernyw (lle mae'r blaid yn sefyll) ond hefyd mewn 83 o seddau ychwanegol y tu allan i Gernyw (yn Lloegr) er mwyn cael DEP. Nid yw'n iawn eithrio Mebyon Kernow pan mae'n cyflwyno ymgeisydd yn yr holl etholaethau sydd ar gael yn rhesymol iddi; b) yng Ngogledd Iwerddon, yr Alban a Chymru, dim ond mewn 3, 10 a 7 o seddau yn y drefn honno y mae'n rhaid i'r pleidiau gwleidyddol gyflwyno ymgeisydd, sydd wedi arwain at ddyrannu DEP i bleidiau gwleidyddol bach mewn etholiadau diweddar; c) ym mis Ebrill 2014 fe wnaeth Llywodraeth y DU gydnabod pobl Cernyw fel lleiafrif cenedlaethol drwy Gonfensiwn Fframwaith Cyngor Ewrop ar Ddiogelu Lleiafrifoedd Cenedlaethol. Mae Mebyon Kernow yn dadlau bod hyn yn cryfhau Ymgynghoriad Ymddiriedolaeth y BBC tudalen 4 cais y blaid i sicrhau bod plaid genedlaethol Cernyw yn cael ei thrin yr un fath â phleidiau yng Nghymru, Gogledd Iwerddon a'r Alban. Yn ogystal â hyn, roedd ymatebion eraill ynghylch sefyllfa Mebyon Kernow yn dadlau: a) bod y meini prawf arfaethedig yn golygu mai'r prif bleidiau sy'n dal i gael y sylw a bod hyn yn gwahaniaethu yn erbyn pleidiau bach fel Mebyon Kernow, sydd wedi cael cyfran uchel o'r bleidlais yn y gorffennol; b) bod nifer yr ymgeiswyr sy'n ofynnol er mwyn sicrhau DEP yn rhy ganolog; c) y gallai gorsafoedd radio lleol (nad ydynt yn cynnwys DEPau ar hyn o bryd) gynnwys DEPau d) ei bod yn ymddangos bod Ymddiriedolaeth y BBC wedi llwyddo i ganfod ateb ymarferol a theg mwy neu lai yn y gwledydd y gellid ei ddefnyddio fel model ar gyfer ateb mwy lleol. Yn ei ymateb, nododd y Bwrdd Gweithredol y pwyntiau canlynol— a) byddai'n anodd gweithredu DEPau rhanbarthol, yn bennaf gan nad yw ardaloedd trawsyrru gwasanaethau darlledu'r BBC yn mapio'n gywir ar ffiniau etholiadol, felly byddai'r bobl sy'n cael DEPau rhanbarthol yn cynnwys y rheini mewn ardaloedd etholiadol lle nad yw'r blaid ranbarthol yn cyflwyno ymgeisydd, ac (i'r gwrthwyneb) efallai na fyddai modd i bobl mewn ardal etholiadol
Recommended publications
  • Opposition Policies on Identity Cards
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2010/04/15/opposition-policies-on-identity-cards/ Opposition policies on identity cards ID cards are a key point of difference between the main parties. Both the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives have pledged to scrap them, while Labour will continue with their plans to introduce them. The LSE Identity Project has been following developments in the UK’s Identity Policy since the early days of the Identity Cards Bill in 2005. Here, Dr Edgar A. Whitley and Dr Gus Hosein from the LSE Identity Project analyse the Labour Party’s manifesto comment on identity cards. Of the published manifestos, so far only the Labour party intends to continue with identity cards for UK nationals. Details of identity card policies for all other published manifestos (as of 14 April 2010) are listed below (alphabetically): • The Alliance Party (NI) would be sceptical towards ID cards; • The Alliance for Green Socialism will “scrap ID cards and databases of personal information”; • The British National Party “reject ID cards” • The Communist Party calls for “an end to prolonged detention without charge, house arrest and plans for ID cards and full restoration of the rights of assembly, protest and free speech”; • The Conservative Party argues that “Labour’s approach to our personal privacy is the worst of all worlds – intrusive, ineffective and enormously expensive” and states that they will “scrap ID cards, the National Identity Register and the Contactpoint database”; • The Democratic Unionist Party believes that “Plans to introduce ID cards should be scrapped” because “they are too expensive and will not tackle terrorism or illegal immigration” • The Green Party will not have ID cards which “are an unnecessary invasion of our privacy and will do nothing to prevent crime and terrorism”.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornishness and Englishness: Nested Identities Or Incompatible Ideologies?
    CORNISHNESS AND ENGLISHNESS: NESTED IDENTITIES OR INCOMPATIBLE IDEOLOGIES? Bernard Deacon (International Journal of Regional and Local History 5.2 (2009), pp.9-29) In 2007 I suggested in the pages of this journal that the history of English regional identities may prove to be ‘in practice elusive and insubstantial’.1 Not long after those words were written a history of the north east of England was published by its Centre for Regional History. Pursuing the question of whether the north east was a coherent and self-conscious region over the longue durée, the editors found a ‘very fragile history of an incoherent and barely self-conscious region’ with a sense of regional identity that only really appeared in the second half of the twentieth century.2 If the north east, widely regarded as the most coherent English region, lacks a historical identity then it is likely to be even more illusory in other regions. Although rigorously testing the past existence of a regional discourse and finding it wanting, Green and Pollard’s book also reminds us that history is not just about scientific accounts of the past. They recognise that history itself is ‘an important element in the construction of the region … Memory of the past is deployed, selectively and creatively, as one means of imagining it … We choose the history we want, to show the kind of region we want to be’.3 In the north east that choice has seemingly crystallised around a narrative of industrialization focused on the coalfield and the gradual imposition of a Tyneside hegemony over the centuries following 1650.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Regionalism and Regionalisation Inn the United Kingdom
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Regionalism after regionalisation : Spain, France and the United Kingdom Schrijver, F.J. Publication date 2006 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Schrijver, F. J. (2006). Regionalism after regionalisation : Spain, France and the United Kingdom. Vossiuspers. http://nl.aup.nl/books/9789056294281-regionalism-after- regionalisation.html General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 88 Regionalism and regionalisation inn the United Kingdom Thee different constituent parts of the United Kingdom, Scotland, Wales, Englandd and Northern Ireland, each with their own characteristics, are well- known,, if only through their separate participation at football or rugby tour- naments.. Still, until very recendy none of those regions had a regional gov- ernmentt or regional elections, and the United Kingdom was among the most centralisedd states in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and European Emerging Values: the Right to Decide
    DEMOCRACY AND EUROPEAN EMERGING VALUES: THE RIGHT TO DECIDE COORDINATED BY GERARD BONA LANGUAGE REVIEW BY EMYR GRUFFYDD CENTRE MAURITS COPPIETERS 2015 Contents Foreword 6 Introduction 8 LAKE OR RIVER 14 THE POLITICAL CARTOONING OF CORNISH SELF-DETERMINATION 22 SELF-DETERMINATION AND WALES 44 TOWARDS SOVEREIGN FAROE ISLANDS 54 ABOUT TRANSYLVANIA 62 THE UDBYOUTH : HOW TO BE YOUNG, BRETON AND LEFT-WING WITHOUT AUTONOMY? 72 THE AUTONOMY GENERATION 80 SELF-DETERMINATION AND THE SILESIAN ISSUE 84 THE VALENCIAN COUNTRY AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION 96 LIBERTY FOR BAVARIA 106 SOVEREIGNTY TO BUILD A GALIZA WITH THE PROMISE OF WORK AND A FUTURE FOR OUR YOUNG PEOPLE 112 “UNTIL ECONOMIC POWER IS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE, THEN THEIR CULTURE, GAELIC OR ENGLISH, WILL BE DESTROYED” 124 FLANDERS: ON THE ROAD TO BELGIAN STATE REFORM NUMBER 7 132 THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN THE CATALAN COUNTRIES: 146 THE RIGHT TO DECIDE OF THREE COUNTRIES AND THEIR NATION This publication is financed with the support of the European Parliament (EP). THE MORAVIAN RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION 154 The EP is not responsible for any use made of the content of this publication. The editor of the publication is the sole person liable. THE ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN THE SELF-DETERMINATION PROCESS OF ARTSAKH 164 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. THE YOUTH, PIONEERS IN THE SELF-DETERMINATION OF SOUTH TYROL? 178 This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information CENTRE MAURITS COPPIETERS 188 contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • MK Manifesto 2015 Master Copy
    VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for the 2015 General Election VOTE FOR CORNWALL … and a new approach to politics Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall Manifesto for 2015 General Election MK POLICY STATEMENTS Mebyon Kernow - the Party for Cornwall is a modern and progressive political party. It is a party of principle, campaigning for a better deal for Cornwall and a fairer, more equitable World. We exist to fight for ALL the people of Cornwall, with a political programme that puts Cornwall first and offers an alternative to the London-based parties. We will play our part in building a confident and outward-looking Cornwall, that has the power to take decisions for itself. To achieve this, our detailed policies are founded on the core values of prosperity for all, social justice and environmental protection. CAMPAIGN PLEDGES 2015 For this election campaign, Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall is focussing on 12 key campaign objectives: Greater self-government for Cornwall Fair funding for Cornwall An end to austerity politics Decent public services for all A strategy for a sustainable economy A fair tax system Planning in and for Cornwall Affordable homes for local people A Climate Change Act for Cornwall A more just and peaceful World A reformed Europe Recognition for Cornwall Greater self-government for Cornwall Mebyon Kernow believes that the historic nation of Cornwall, with its own distinct identity, language and heritage, has the same right to self-determination as other constituent parts of the UK, such as Scotland and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Club: 2021 English Local Elections Briefing
    English Local Elections 6 May 2021 This briefing contains a detailed summary of the candidates standing for election in the English local elections, to be held on 6 May 2021. This data includes by-elections in England, but does not cover the estimated 2,000 town and parish councils holding elections on 6 May.1 The data is drawn from 4,115 Statements of Persons Nominated published by English councils on 8-9 April 2021, and was manually collected and checked by Democracy Club’s nationwide network of volunteers. All numbers reflect our database as of 13 April 2021. The full candidate CSV datafiles can be downloaded from our Candidates database. Details of candidates per party and ward can be found here. Democracy Club would like to thank the hundreds of people who volunteered their time between 8-12 April 2021 to collect the data which made this analysis possible. Voters can get locally specific information at WhoCanIVoteFor.co.uk. About Democracy Club Democracy Club is a Community Interest Company which builds digital tools to support everyone’s participation in UK elections. We believe that information about upcoming elections should be easy to find, especially online. Our free and accessible tools and databases are used by millions of UK voters each year. Democracy Club works closely with local government, and is a data provider to The Electoral Commission. Democracy Club’s vision is of an electoral system which is fit for the digital age. 1 Town and parish councils estimate courtesy of the National Association of Local Councils. 1 Key summary ● Combining scheduled elections and by-elections, exactly 5,000 councillors are to be elected on 6 May.
    [Show full text]
  • County and European Elections
    County and European elections Report 5 June 2009 and Analysis County and European elections Report and 5 June 2009 Analysis County and European elections 5 June 2009 3 Contents 5 Acknowledgements 7 Executive summary 9 Political context 11 Electoral systems 13 The European Parliament elections 27 The local authority elections 39 The mayoral elections 43 National implications 51 A tale of two elections 53 Appendix 53 Definition of STV European Parliament constituencies 55 Abbreviations County and European elections 5 June 2009 5 Acknowledgements The author, Lewis Baston, would like to thank his colleagues at the Electoral Reform Society for their help in compiling the data from these elections, particularly Andrew White, Hywel Nelson and Magnus Smidak in the research team, and those campaign staff who lent their assistance. Beatrice Barleon did valuable work that is reflected in the European sections. Thank you also to Ashley Dé for his efforts in bringing it to publication, and to Tom Carpenter for design work. Several Regional Returning Officers, and Adam Gray, helped with obtaining local detail on the European election results. Any errors of fact or judgement are my own. County and European elections 5 June 2009 7 Executive summary 1. In the European elections only 43.4 per cent 9. Many county councils now have lopsided supported either the Conservatives or Labour, Conservative majorities that do not reflect the the lowest such proportion ever. While this was balance of opinion in their areas. connected with the political climate over MPs’ expenses, it merely continues a long-term 10. This is bad for democracy because of the trend of decline in the two-party system.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Author's Draft of a Paper Submitted for Publication in Nations
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences School of Nursing and Midwifery 2016-04-08 The fragmentation of the nation state? Regional development, distinctiveness, and the growth of nationalism in Cornish politics Willett, J http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5273 10.1111/nana.12188 Nations and Nationalism Wiley All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. This is the author’s draft of a paper submitted for publication in Nations and Nationalism 2016 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nana.12188 The Fragmentation of the Nation State? Regional Development, Distinctiveness, and the Growth of Nationalism in Cornish Politics. Abstract Stateless nations across the EU have become increasingly vocal and confident in asserting a desire for autonomy, devolved governance, and independence. Meanwhile, identity politics has become a key factor of contemporary European regional development, with utility as a social, economic and governance tool. Culture has become a resource for regional branding to attract inward investment and differentiate in terms of competitiveness. The paper considers whether the utility of identity to regional development might provide an explanation for the growing confidence of EU stateless nations. We use the case study of Cornwall to explore the correlation, arguing that economic regionalism has provided a space for the articulation of national identities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Cartooning of Cornish Self- Determination
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences Peninsula Medical School 2015-09-18 Cornish Self-determination: a semiotic analysis of political cartooning Tredinnick-Rowe, JF http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15988 Centre Maurits Coppieters All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. DEMOCRACY AND EUROPEAN EMERGING VALUES: THE RIGHT TO DECIDE COORDINATED BY GERARD BONA LANGUAGE REVIEW BY EMYR GRUFFYDD CENTRE MAURITS COPPIETERS 2015 Contents Foreword 6 Introduction 8 LAKE OR RIVER 14 THE POLITICAL CARTOONING OF CORNISH SELF-DETERMINATION 22 SELF-DETERMINATION AND WALES 44 TOWARDS SOVEREIGN FAROE ISLANDS 54 ABOUT TRANSYLVANIA 62 THE UDBYOUTH : HOW TO BE YOUNG, BRETON AND LEFT-WING WITHOUT AUTONOMY? 72 THE AUTONOMY GENERATION 80 SELF-DETERMINATION AND THE SILESIAN ISSUE 84 THE VALENCIAN COUNTRY AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION 96 LIBERTY FOR BAVARIA 106 SOVEREIGNTY TO BUILD A GALIZA WITH THE PROMISE OF WORK AND A FUTURE FOR OUR YOUNG PEOPLE 112 “UNTIL ECONOMIC POWER IS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE, THEN THEIR CULTURE, GAELIC OR ENGLISH, WILL BE DESTROYED” 124 FLANDERS: ON THE ROAD TO BELGIAN STATE REFORM NUMBER 7 132 THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN THE CATALAN COUNTRIES: 146 THE RIGHT TO DECIDE OF THREE COUNTRIES AND THEIR NATION This publication is financed with the support of the European Parliament (EP).
    [Show full text]
  • Cornish Nation No
    STANDING UP FOR CORNWALL Our pledges to you Mebyon Kernow – the Party for Cornwall is a United Kingdom. This situation has been greatly political party with a difference. MK is based in worsened by the cuts from recent governments. Cornwall and exists to win a better deal for all MK councillors will: the people of our nation. We have no political masters in Westminster to please and will Campaign for decent levels of funding for always fight for the best interests for our area. local government, hospitals and social care, schools and our vital public services. MK is also leading the campaign for the devolution of meaningful powers to Cornwall Oppose the latest (Sustainability and through the creation of a National Assembly of Transformation Plan) reorganisation of the Cornwall. National Health Service, which reinforces the £264 million under-funding of the local Restore faith in local government NHS and threatens community hospitals. Mebyon Kernow believes that councils should Push for a Commission to investigate the serve the best interests of local communities, full extent of Government under-funding of but it is a sad fact that they are increasingly Cornwall and its communities. becoming just an agency of central government, imposing London-centric diktats onto the Protect the less-well-off and the people of Cornwall. vulnerable MK councillors will: Mebyon Kernow is committed to a just and fair society, in which we combat poverty and social Be passionate and hard-working champions deprivation, and tackle ills such as in-work for their local area and Cornwall as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 European Election Results for London
    2009 European election results for London Data Management and Analysis Group 2009 European election results for London DMAG Briefing 2009-07 July 2009 Gareth Piggott ISSN 1479-7879 DMAG Briefing 2009-07 1 2009 European election results for London DMAG Briefing 2009-07 July 2009 2009 European election results for London For more information please contact: Gareth Piggott Data Management and Analysis Group Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA Tel: 020 7983 4327 e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Greater London Authority, 2009 Source of all data: Regional Returning Officers All maps are © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. (Greater London Authority) (LA100032379) (2009) Data can be made available in other formats on request In some charts in this report colours that are associated with political parties are used. Printing in black and white, can make those charts hard to read. ISSN 1479-7879 This briefing is printed on at least 70 per cent recycled paper. The paper is suitable for recycling. 2 DMAG Briefing 2009-07 2009 European election results for London List of tables, charts and maps Page Turnout Map 1 Turnout 2009, by borough 5 Map 2 Change in turnout 2004-2009, by borough 5 Result Table 3 Summary of election results 1999-2009, London 5 Table 4 Order of winning seats, London 2009 6 Figure 5 Shares of votes, 2009, London and UK 7 Figure 6 Share of vote for main parties by UK region, 2009 8 London voting trends 1999-2009 Figure 7 Share of votes for main parties, UK 1999 to 2009 8 Figure 8
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Campaign Spending at the 2009 European Parliamentary
    Report on campaign spending at the 2009 European Parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom and local elections in England March 2010 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Electoral Commission: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] © The Electoral Commission 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 European Parliamentary election campaign expenditure by political parties 2 Overview 4 Great Britain expenditure 5 Party expenditure (per category) 14 Northern Ireland expenditure 19 3 European Parliamentary election controlled expenditure by recognised third parties 24 4 European Parliamentary election expenditure by individual candidates 26 5 Expenditure incurred during unitary and English county elections 27 Appendices Appendix A: Parties (including Northern Ireland) that contested the European Parliamentary elections in 2004 and 2009 28 Appendix B: Expenditure categories 30 1 Introduction 1.1 The Electoral Commission’s aim is to instill integrity and public confidence in the democratic process. One of our key objectives is to ensure integrity and transparency of party and election finance. We also have a statutory duty to report on elections.1 This report provides details and analysis of the campaign expenditure incurred by political parties, third parties and candidates at the June 2009 European Parliamentary elections and also candidates at local elections in England in 2009. 1.2 This report is informed by the political parties’ campaign expenditure returns, candidates’ election expenditure returns and previous reports2 published by the Commission on the European Parliamentary elections. 1.3 The report is divided into four sections.
    [Show full text]