INSTITUT F¨UR INFORMATIK Frederic Pascal Sautter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INSTITUT F¨UR INFORMATIK Frederic Pascal Sautter INSTITUT FUR¨ INFORMATIK der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Munchen¨ AFRAMEWORK FOR OBSERVING THE PARALLEL EXECUTION OF RUST PROGRAMS Frederic Pascal Sautter Masterarbeit Aufgabensteller Prof. Dr. Franc¸ois Bry Betreuer Prof. Dr. Franc¸ois Bry, Thomas Prokosch Abgabe am 07. Juni 2019 2 Erklarung¨ Hiermit versichere ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstandig¨ verfasst habe und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel verwendet habe. Munchen,¨ den 07. Juni 2019 Frederic Pascal Sautter i ii Abstract With computing hardware evolving, processors incorporate more and more processing units. As the number of simultaneously possible computations steadily increases, devel- oping efficient and reliable parallel applications becomes essential in order to take full ad- vantage of the additional computing power. The young programming language Rust aims to ease the development of such high-performance applications. In contrast to Fortran, C, and C++, languages common in the high-performance computing domain, Rust combines low-level control of resources with strong safety guarantees. However, existing parallel performance analysis tools such as Score-P, TAU, and Vampir lack support for Rust. This work presents the design and implementation of the tRust framework, which al- lows observing the execution of parallel Rust applications. This framework provides a modified Rust compiler for the automated insertion of probes into the observed program and its dependencies. A run-time library enables the transmission of observation data to a central collector application for persistent storage. This centrally collected data allows for extensive analysis of the run-time behavior of the program. The tRust framework is evaluated using three different benchmark applications, each targeting one of three common parallelism libraries in Rust. The experiments suggest good performance of the tRust framework. More important is the fact that tRust allows program- mers to precisely retrace program execution of concurrent and parallel Rust programs with libraries that implement parallel paradigms not immediately available in the established HPC programming languages Fortran, C, and C++. iii iv Zusammenfassung Durch laufende Weiterentwicklung von Rechnerhardware erhalten Prozessoren immer mehr parallel arbeitende Recheneinheiten. Da dadurch die Zahl der simultan moglichen¨ Berechnungen steigt, wird die Entwicklung von effizienten und zuverlassigen¨ parallelen Programmen unerlasslich,¨ um die zusatzliche¨ Rechenkapazitat¨ voll auszuschopfen.¨ Die junge Programmiersprache Rust versucht die Entwicklung solcher hochperformanter An- wendungen zu erleichtern. Im Gegensatz zu den Sprachen Fortran, C und C++, die bei der Programmierung von Hochleistungsrechnern vorwiegend eingesetzt werden, kombiniert Rust hardwarenahen Zugriff mit starken Sicherheitsgarantien. Jedoch, fehlt bei existieren- den parallelen Leistungsanalysewerkzeugen, Score-P, TAU und Vampir die Unterstutzung¨ fur¨ Rust. Diese Arbeit legt den Entwurf und die Umsetzung des tRust Frameworks dar, mit dem der Ablauf paralleler Rust-Anwendungen uberwacht¨ werden kann. Das Werkzeug stellt einen modifizierten Rust Compiler zur Verfugung,¨ der das automatisierte Einfugen¨ von Analyseinstruktionen in das zu uberwachte¨ Programm und dessen Abhangigkeiten¨ ermoglicht.¨ Eine Laufzeitbibliothek ermoglicht¨ das Ubertragen¨ der Uberwachungsdaten¨ an eine zentrale Sammelanwendung fur¨ die persistente Speicherung. Diese zentral abge- legten Daten konnen¨ in weiterer Folge fur¨ die ausfuhrliche¨ Analyse des Programmablaufs genutzt werden. Das vorgestellte tRust Werkzeug wird anhand von drei unterschiedlichen Testanwen- dungen beurteilt, wobei jede Anwendung auf eine von drei gelaufigen¨ parallelen Pro- grammbibliotheken zugeschnitten ist. Die Experimente legen nahe, dass tRust eine ange- messene Leistung erzielt. Wichtiger ist die Tatsache, dass Entwickler die Moglichkeit¨ er- halten, den Programmablauf von nebenlaufigen¨ und parallelen Rust Programmen, die in den ublicherweise¨ im Hochstleistungsbereich¨ eingesetzten Programmiersprachen Fortran, C und C++ nicht unmittelbar zur Verfugung¨ stehen. v vi Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the help and support of many others. First, I want to thank Prof. Dr. Franc¸ois Bry for his valuable advice and guidance through- out this project. The suggestions and the feedback he provided often helped to concentrate on what is essential. I want to express my great gratitude to my advisor Thomas Prokosch for his outstanding support and advice at all times. Whenever I got stuck along the way, Thomas encouraged me by providing useful suggestions and ideas. Particularly, his backing during the many meetings helped to focus on and structure my work. Special thanks go to my parents for their moral support especially in challenging times. Furthermore, I express my heartfelt gratitude to Annabel for her backing at all times. Fi- nally, I thank my friends for taking my mind off things from time to time. vii viii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Rust Programming Language 3 2.1 Selected Syntax Elements . .3 2.2 Ownership and Borrowing . .6 2.3 Concurrency and Parallelism in Rust . 10 2.4 Rust Infrastructure and Compiler . 11 3 Theoretical Foundations 15 3.1 Instrumentation . 15 3.1.1 Source-based Instrumentation . 17 3.1.2 Preprocessor-based Instrumentation . 17 3.1.3 Compiler-based Instrumentation . 18 3.1.4 Wrapper Library-based Instrumentation . 18 3.1.5 Binary Instrumentation . 18 3.2 Architecture of Parallel Performance Tools . 18 3.2.1 Observer . 19 3.2.2 Inspector . 20 3.3 Parallel Libraries and Interfaces . 20 3.3.1 MPI . 20 3.3.2 Crossbeam (Rust) . 21 3.3.3 POSIX-Threads . 22 3.3.4 OpenMP . 22 3.3.5 Rayon (Rust) . 23 3.3.6 Timely Dataflow (Rust) . 24 3.4 Existing Tools . 25 3.4.1 TAU Parallel Performance System . 25 3.4.2 Vampir . 27 3.4.3 Score-P performance measurement infrastructure . 28 4 Framework Design 29 4.1 Technical Implementations of Rust Instrumentation . 30 4.1.1 Wrapper Libraries . 31 4.1.2 Compiler Plugin . 32 4.1.3 Drop-In Compiler . 33 4.2 Run-Time Instrumentation Architecture . 35 4.3 Instrumentation of Rust Source Code . 37 ix x CONTENTS 4.3.1 Import Statements . 37 4.3.2 Global Scope Instructions . 37 4.3.3 Local Scope Instructions . 38 4.3.4 Instrumentation Calls around Functions . 40 4.3.5 Instrumentation Calls around Methods . 41 4.4 Persistent Storage of Trace Data . 42 5 Experiments and Results 45 5.1 Evaluation Environment . 45 5.2 Benchmarks . 46 5.2.1 Creating Vanity Keys . 46 5.2.2 Fractal Calculation . 49 5.2.3 PageRank . 51 6 Conclusion and Future Work 55 A Usage of the tRust Framework 57 A.1 Setting up a Rustup Toolchain . 57 A.2 Description of the Configuration File . 58 B Experiments 59 Bibliography 69 CHAPTER 1 Introduction In recent years computing hardware has evolved to a point where almost every computing device contains parallel hardware. From small embedded systems to computer clusters consisting of thousands of nodes, multi-core processors have become the standard in 2019. Chip manufacturers such as Intel and AMD release processors containing up to 56 [6] or 64 [1] cores respectively. Moreover, many systems contain graphics chips, which are made up of an increasing number of compute units. The number of simultaneously possible com- putations constantly increases. In order to benefit from this additional computing power, appropriate software is required. Software developers need to design applications which effectively leverage parallelism. However, experience has shown that creating reliable and efficient parallel programs is difficult. Parallel computing is significantly more complex, as it introduces new classes of errors such as deadlocks and race-conditions, not possible in serial programs. These errors can be difficult to detect since they often occur under specific circumstances. Developing programming languages designed for the use in concurrent and parallel environments is one approach to enhance reliability and efficiency of parallel programs. Especially since the systems-level languages commonly used for the development of per- formance critical applications, in particular Fortran, C and C++ provide, little to no safety guarantees at all. For this reason, the Rust programming language was developed. Rust incorporates elements of conventional systems programming language as well as elements of modern high-level languages [7]. It combines low-level control of resources with strong safety guarantees. Rust’s expressive static type system enables the compiler to prevent many memory errors and data races. As a consequence, Rust empowers developers to take advantage of modern parallel hardware [42]. While Rust manages to prevent data races there are other errors it cannot prevent, such as bottlenecks occurring when threads are not properly synchronized. Such errors can only be detected at run-time. In order to analyze and further optimize the complex parallel run- time behavior additional tools are required. In the context of high-performance computing (HPC), there already exist sophisticated tools for the analysis of parallel and distributed execution. Tools like Score-P [37], TAU [56], HPCToolkit [18] and Vampir [48] allow the collection of detailed event data during the programs execution. Based on this data it is possible to gain insight into the programs state during execution, providing in-depth infor- mation of its run-time behavior. Accordingly, these tools assist developers in finding most of the remaining
Recommended publications
  • D5.1 Report on Performance and Tuning of Runtime Libraries for ARM
    D5.1 Report on performance and tuning of runtime libraries for ARM Architecture Version 1.0 Document Information Contract Number 288777 Project Website www.montblanc-project.eu Contractual Deadline M12 Dissemintation Level PU Nature Report Coordinator Alex Ramirez (BSC) Contributors Isaac Gelado (BSC), Xavier Martorell (BSC), Judit Gimenez (BSC), Harald Servat (BSC), Bernd Mohr (JUELICH), Daniel Lorenz (JUELICH), Marc Schluetter (JUELICH) Reviewers Chris Adeniyi-Jones (ARM) Keywords compiler, runtime system, parallelism, instrumentation, perfor- mance analysis Notices: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 288777 c 2011 Mont-Blanc Consortium Partners. All rights reserved. D5.1 - Report on performance and tuning of runtime libraries for ARM Architecture Version 1.0 Change Log Version Description of Change v0.1 Initial draft released to the WP5 contributors v0.2 Draft version sent to internal reviewer v1.0 Final version sent to the EU 2 D5.1 - Report on performance and tuning of runtime libraries for ARM Architecture Version 1.0 Contents Executive Summary 4 1 Introduction 5 2 Runtime Libraries 6 2.1 Mercurium compiler . .6 2.1.1 Porting to ARM-v7 . .6 2.1.2 Fortran support . .6 2.2 Nanos++ . .7 2.3 Extrae instrumentation library . .8 2.4 Scalasca support for the ARM platform . .8 3 Performance Analysis and Tuning 11 4 Conclusions 14 3 D5.1 - Report on performance and tuning of runtime libraries for ARM Architecture Version 1.0 Executive Summary In this Mont-Blanc deliverable we present the current status of porting to the ARM architecture of the OmpSs (Mercurium compiler and Nanos++ runtime system), the Extrae instrumentation library and the Scalasca instrumentation facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalasca User Guide
    Scalasca 2.5 User Guide Scalable Automatic Performance Analysis March 2019 The Scalasca Development Team [email protected] The entire code of Scalasca v2 is licensed under the BSD-style license agreement given below, except for the third-party code distributed in the 'vendor/' subdirectory. Please see the corresponding COPYING files in the subdirectories of 'vendor/' included in the distribution tarball for details. Scalasca v2 License Agreement Copyright © 1998–2019 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany Copyright © 2009–2015 German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, Jülich/Aachen, Germany Copyright © 2014–2015 RWTH Aachen University, Germany Copyright © 2003–2008 University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA Copyright © 2006 Technische Universität Dresden, Germany All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: • Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. • Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. • Neither the names of – the Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, – the German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, – the RWTH Aachen University, – the University of Tennessee, – the Technische Universität Dresden, nor the names of their contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DIS- CLAIMED.
    [Show full text]
  • TAU, PAPI, Scalasca and Vampir
    Parallel Performance Evaluation Tools: TAU, PAPI, Scalasca and Vampir Two day tutorial at LLNL Building 453 R1001 (Armadillo), May 26-27, Livermore, CA Sameer Shende [email protected] http://www.paratools.com/llnl09 Outline Slide # • Outline and workshop goals 2 • Part I: TAU: A quick reference 8 • Part II: Introduction to performance engineering 77 • Part III: PAPI 105 • Part IV: TAU 119 • Part V: Vampir/VNG 266 • Part VI: Scalasca/KOJAK 307 • Lab Session: PAPI, TAU, Vampir and Scalasca examples 385 2 1 Outline • Day 1: – Introduction to performance evaluation tools: TAU, PAPI, Scalasca, and Vampir – Hands-on: – TAU instrumentation at routine, loop level, PAPI hardware performance counter data collection, derived metrics, analyzing performance using TAU’s paraprof profile browser, using Performance database (PerfDMF), memory evaluation, leak detection • Day 2: – Scalasca, TAU PerfExplorer, VampirServer – Hands-on: – Scalasca bottleneck detection tools, PerfExplorer, trace visualization, workshop examples including the NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.1 3 Workshop Goals • This tutorial is an introduction to portable performance evaluation tools. • You should leave here with a better understanding of… – Concepts and steps involved in performance evaluation – Understanding key concepts in improving and understanding code performance – How to collect and analyze data from hardware performance counters using PAPI – How to instrument your programs with TAU – Automatic instrumentation at the routine level and outer loop level – Manual instrumentation
    [Show full text]
  • Score-P – a Joint Performance Measurement Run-Time Infrastructure for Periscope, Scalasca, TAU, and Vampir
    VIRTUAL INSTITUTE – HIGH PRODUCTIVITY SUPERCOMPUTING Score-P – A Joint Performance Measurement Run-Time Infrastructure for Periscope, Scalasca, TAU, and Vampir VI-HPS Team VIRTUAL INSTITUTE – HIGH PRODUCTIVITY SUPERCOMPUTING Congratulations!? . If you made it this far, you successfully used Score-P to . instrument the application . analyze its execution with a summary measurement, and . examine it with one the interactive analysis report explorer GUIs . ... revealing the call-path profile annotated with . the “Time” metric . Visit counts . MPI message statistics (bytes sent/received) . ... but how good was the measurement? . The measured execution produced the desired valid result . however, the execution took rather longer than expected! . even when ignoring measurement start-up/completion, therefore . it was probably dilated by instrumentation/measurement overhead SCORE-P AND SCALASCA PERFORMANCE TOOLS TRAINING, NERSC, JULY 26, 2016 2 VIRTUAL INSTITUTE – HIGH PRODUCTIVITY SUPERCOMPUTING Performance analysis steps . 0.0 Reference preparation for validation . 1.0 Program instrumentation . 1.1 Summary measurement collection . 1.2 Summary analysis report examination . 2.0 Summary experiment scoring . 2.1 Summary measurement collection with filtering . 2.2 Filtered summary analysis report examination . 3.0 Event trace collection . 3.1 Event trace examination & analysis SCORE-P AND SCALASCA PERFORMANCE TOOLS TRAINING, NERSC, JULY 26, 2016 3 VIRTUAL INSTITUTE – HIGH PRODUCTIVITY SUPERCOMPUTING BT-MZ summary analysis result scoring % scorep-score scorep_bt-mz_B.8x4.<jobid>/profile.cubex . Report scoring as textual Estimated aggregate size of event trace: 40 GB Estimated requirements for largest trace buffer (max_buf): 6 GB output Estimated memory requirements (SCOREP_TOTAL_MEMORY): 6 GB (warning: The memory requirements cannot be satisfied by Score-P to avoid intermediate flushes when tracing.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiling and Tracing Tools for Performance Analysis of Large Scale Applications
    Available online at www.prace-ri.eu Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe Profiling and Tracing Tools for Performance Analysis of Large Scale Applications Jerry Erikssonb, Pedro Ojeda-Mayb, Thomas Ponweisera,*, Thomas Steinreitera aRISC Software GmbH, Softwarepark 35, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria bHigh Performance Computing Center North (HPC2N), MIT Huset, Umeå Universitet, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden Abstract The usage of modern profiling and tracing tools is vital for understanding program behaviour, performance bottlenecks and optimisation potentials in HPC applications. Despite their obvious benefits, such tools are still not that widely adopted within the HPC user community. The two main reasons for this are firstly unawareness and secondly the sometimes inhibitive complexity of getting started with these tools. In this work we aim to address this issue by presenting and comparing the capabilities of four different performance analysis tools, which are 1) HPCToolkit, 2) Extrae and Paraver, 3) SCALASCA and 4) the Intel Trace Analyzer and Collector (ITAC). The practical usage of these tools is demonstrated based on case studies on the widely used molecular dynamics simulation code GROMACS. Keywords: Performance Analysis, Profiling, Tracing, HPCToolkit, Extrae, Paraver, SCALASCA, ITAC, GROMACS 1. Introduction Background of this work is a survey conducted by the PRACE project in the beginning of 2016. In order to develop links to European Centres of Excellence (CoEs) and to understand their needs with respect to high performance computing, a questionnaire has been developed and circulated to each of eight selected CoEs. The results of this survey are summarised in the PRACE-4IP deliverable D7.3 [1]. One finding of this survey which motivated the present work is that from the CoE’s answers it is evident that still the use of profiling tools for code optimization is not that well established.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Guide Modern Processors
    Best Practice Guide Modern Processors Ole Widar Saastad, University of Oslo, Norway Kristina Kapanova, NCSA, Bulgaria Stoyan Markov, NCSA, Bulgaria Cristian Morales, BSC, Spain Anastasiia Shamakina, HLRS, Germany Nick Johnson, EPCC, United Kingdom Ezhilmathi Krishnasamy, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Sebastien Varrette, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg Hayk Shoukourian (Editor), LRZ, Germany Updated 5-5-2021 1 Best Practice Guide Modern Processors Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 2. ARM Processors ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Architecture ................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1. Kunpeng 920 ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. ThunderX2 .......................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3. NUMA architecture .............................................................................................. 9 2.2. Programming Environment ............................................................................................... 9 2.2.1. Compilers ........................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2. Vendor performance libraries
    [Show full text]
  • CUBE 4.3.4 – User Guide Generic Display for Application Performance Data
    CUBE 4.3.4 – User Guide Generic Display for Application Performance Data April 3, 2016 The Scalasca Development Team [email protected] ii Chapter 0. Copyright Copyright Copyright © 1998–2016 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany Copyright © 2009–2015 German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, Jülich/Aachen, Germany All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are per- mitted provided that the following conditions are met: • Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. • Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. • Neither the names of Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH or German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, Jülich/Aachen, nor the names of their con- tributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIB - UTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITN - ESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDI - NG, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVIC - ES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIB - ILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalasca 2.3 User Guide Scalable Automatic Performance Analysis
    Scalasca 2.3 User Guide Scalable Automatic Performance Analysis May 2016 The Scalasca Development Team [email protected] The entire code of Scalasca v2 is licensed under the BSD-style license agreement given below, except for the third-party code distributed in the 'vendor/' subdirectory. Please see the corresponding COPYING files in the subdirectories of 'vendor/' included in the distribution tarball for details. Scalasca v2 License Agreement Copyright © 1998–2016 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany Copyright © 2009–2015 German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, Jülich/Aachen, Germany Copyright © 2014–2015 RWTH Aachen University, Germany Copyright © 2003–2008 University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA Copyright © 2006 Technische Universität Dresden, Germany All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: • Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. • Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. • Neither the names of – the Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, – the German Research School for Simulation Sciences GmbH, – the RWTH Aachen University, – the University of Tennessee, – the Technische Universität Dresden, nor the names of their contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DIS- CLAIMED.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scalasca Performance Toolset Architecture
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION: PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE Concurrency Computat.: Pract. Exper. 2010; 22:702–719 Prepared using cpeauth.cls [Version: 2002/09/19 v2.02] The Scalasca performance toolset architecture Markus Geimer1, Felix Wolf1,2,3, Brian J.N. Wylie1, Erika Abrah´am´ 3, Daniel Becker1,3, Bernd Mohr1 1 J¨ulich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich, 52425 J¨ulich, Germany 2 German Research School for Simulation Sciences, 52062 Aachen, Germany 3 Computer Science Department, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany SUMMARY Scalasca is a performance toolset that has been specifically designed to analyze parallel application execution behavior on large-scale systems with many thousands of processors. It offers an incremental performance-analysis procedure that integrates runtime summaries with in-depth studies of concurrent behavior via event tracing, adopting a strategy of successively refined measurement configurations. Distinctive features are its ability to identify wait states in applications with very large numbers of processes and to combine these with efficiently summarized local measurements. In this article, we review the current toolset architecture, emphasizing its scalable design and the role of the different components in transforming raw measurement data into knowledge of application execution behavior. The scalability and effectiveness of Scalasca are then surveyed from experience measuring and analyzing real-world applications on a range of computer systems. key words: parallel computing, performance analysis,
    [Show full text]
  • Score-P – a Joint Performance Measurement Run-Time Infrastructure for Periscope, Scalasca, TAU, and Vampir
    Score-P – A Joint Performance Measurement Run-Time Infrastructure for Periscope, Scalasca, TAU, and Vampir Markus Geimer1), Bert Wesarg2) With contributions from Andreas Knüpfer2) and Christian Rössel1) 1)FZ Jülich, 2)ZIH TU Dresden Fragmentation of tools landscape • Several performance tools co-exist • With own measurement systems and output formats • Complementary features and overlapping functionality • Redundant effort for development and maintenance • Limited or expensive interoperability • Complications for user experience, support, training Vampir Scalasca TAU Periscope VampirTrace EPILOG / TAU native Online OTF CUBE formats measurement EuroMPI‘12: Hands-on Practical Hybrid Parallel Application Performance Engineering SILC Project Idea • Start a community effort for a common infrastructure – Score-P instrumentation and measurement system – Common data formats OTF2 and CUBE4 • Developer perspective: – Save manpower by sharing development resources – Invest in new analysis functionality and scalability – Save efforts for maintenance, testing, porting, support, training • User perspective: – Single learning curve – Single installation, fewer version updates – Interoperability and data exchange • SILC project funded by BMBF • Close collaboration PRIMA project funded by DOE EuroMPI‘12: Hands-on Practical Hybrid Parallel Application Performance Engineering Partners • Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany • German Research School for Simulation Sciences, Aachen, Germany • Gesellschaft für numerische Simulation mbH Braunschweig, Germany •
    [Show full text]
  • The Arm Architecture for Exascale HPC
    The Arm Architecture for Exascale HPC EXALAT - Lattice Field Theory at the Exascale Dr. Olly Perks - Principal HPC Engineer [email protected] 17th June 2020 © 2020 Arm Limited (or its affiliates) Arm and our role in HPC © 2020 Arm Limited (or its affiliates) What is Arm? • Arm designs IP (such as the Arm ISA) • We do not manufacture hardware • 32-bit RISC instruction encoding • More simplistic but limiting • AArch64 execution state • Atomic memory ops • Half-precision float • Pointer authentication • A64 instruction set • Type2 hypervisor support • RAS support • Nested virtualization 4 © 2020 Arm Limited (or its affiliates) • Statistical profiling • Complex float Why Arm? Especially for Infrastructure / HPC / Scientific Computing / ML? Hardware Software • Flexibility: Allow vendors to differentiate • All based on the same instruction set • Speed and cost of development • Commonality between hardware • Reuse of software • Provide different licensing • Core - Reference design (A53/A72/N1) • Comprehensive software ecosystem • Architecture - Design your own (TX2, A64FX) • Operating systems, compilers, libraries, tools • Not just vendor - third party too • Other hardware components • NoCs, GPUs, memory controllers • “Building blocks” design • Large community • Everything from Android to HPC • Architecture validation for correctness 5 © 2020 Arm Limited (or its affiliates) Variation in the Processor Market Marvell (Cavium) Ampere (X-Gene) eMag Quicksilver Fujitsu Huawei (HiSilicon) 1616 Amazon (Annapurna) EPI / SiPearl Other PHYTIUM 6 © 2020 Arm Limited (or its affiliates) Each generation brings faster performance and new infrastructure specific features 5nm 7nm+ 7nm Poseidon 16nm Zeus Platform Ares Platform Cosmos Platform Platform “N1” 2021 2020 Today 2018 30% Faster System Performance per Generation + New Features Limited Arm © 2018 © Not Just Hardware Applications Performance Open-source, owned, commercial ISV codes, … Engineering … PBS Pro, Altair IBM LSF, SLURM, Arm Forge (DDT, MAP), Rogue Wave, HPC Toolkit, Schedulers Containers, Interpreters, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Performance Analysis of PFLOTRAN with Scalasca
    Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Large-scale performance analysis of PFLOTRAN 2011-05-26 | 2011-05-26 [email protected] Jülich Supercomputing Centre Brian J. N. Wylie & Mar with Scalasca kus Geimer Overview Dagstuhl challenge ■ PFLOTRAN at large-scale on Cray XT5 & IBM BG/P Scalasca performance analysis toolset ■ Overview of architecture and usage ■ Instrumentation of PFLOTRAN & PETSc ■ Summary & trace measurement experiments ■ Analysis report & trace exploration Scalasca scalability improvement ■ Unification of definition identifiers Conclusions 2011-05-26 | CUG2011 (Fairbanks) Brian J. N. Wylie, Jülich Supercomputing Centre 2 Dagstuhl challenge Demonstrate performance measurement and analysis of PFLOTRAN using “2B” problem dataset and more than 10,000 MPI processes Challenge issued for Dagstuhl seminar 10181 (3-7 May 2010) on “Program development for extreme-scale computing” ■ two months notice with download/build/run instructions ■ accounts/allocations provided by VI-HPS & INCITE/PEAC ■ IBM BG/P (jugene.fz-juelich.de) ■ Cray XT5 (jaguar.nccs.ornl.gov) ■ numerous research groups and vendors presented their results and discussed issues encountered ■ http://www.dagstuhl.de/10181 2011-05-26 | CUG2011 (Fairbanks) Brian J. N. Wylie, Jülich Supercomputing Centre 3 PFLOTRAN 3D reservoir simulator actively developed by LANL/ORNL/PNNL ■ approx. 80,000 lines of Fortran9X, combining solvers for ■ PFLOW non-isothermal, multi-phase groundwater flow ■ PTRAN reactive, multi-component contaminant transport ■ employs PETSc, LAPACK, BLAS & HDF5 I/O libraries ■ 87 PFLOTRAN + 789 PETSc source files ■ parallel I/O tuning via PERI active liaison ■ “2B” input dataset run for 10 timesteps ■ uses 3-dimensional (non-MPI) PETSc Cartesian grid ■ TRAN(sport) step scales much better than FLOW step ■ FLOW step generally faster, but crossover at larger scales 2011-05-26 | CUG2011 (Fairbanks) Brian J.
    [Show full text]