DOCSLIB.ORG

Mill, Method, and the Art of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mill, Method, and the Art of Life The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Beaumont, Tim John. 2016. Mill, Method, and the Art of Life. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493435 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Mill, Method, and the Art of Life A dissertation presented by Tim John Beaumont to The Department of Government in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2016 © 2016 Tim Beaumont All rights reserved. Advisor: Richard Tuck Tim John Beaumont Mill, Method, and the Art of Life Abstract For John Stuart Mill, the art to which all others lie subordinate is “the Art of Life, in its three departments, Morality, Prudence or Policy, and Aesthetics; the Right, the Expedient, and the Beautiful or Noble, in human conduct and works.” Though “the reasonings which connect the end or purpose of every art with its means, belongs to the domain of Science”, he tells us, “the definition of the end itself belongs exclusively to Art, and forms its peculiar province.” This thesis uses analytical methods, de dicto and de re interpretation, and rational reconstruction, to unlock the fundamental axiological and existential premises at the heart of Mill’s Art of Life. In so doing it reveals the way in which these premises simultaneously: combine with Mill’s political science to help to produce his favored synthesis of liberalism, socialism, and democracy; threaten to destabilize this synthesis from within; and point the way towards a stable resolution. For Mill, the Art of Life is a search for the appropriate quasi-Platonic balance between Morality, Nobility, and Prudence, with Morality leading without dominating the remainder. In consequence, an Art of Life, as thus conceived, can fail in any of three ways, corresponding to the assignment of undue scope to any one department at the expense of the others. In the case of Prudence, Mill warns that a narrow egoism can lead one to instrumentalize, and thereby become alienated from, the activities and people that give one’s life meaning. Life meaning is best found by self-improvement (Nobility) in ways which benefit others (Morality). However, for this meaning to be self-sustaining, and immune from analytical subversion, Nobility and Morality must be cultivated emotionally as well as intellectually. Some Marxist critics have questioned whether Mill’s Art achieves such a balance, by suggesting that its high-minded Nobility and Morality is a veneer for crude class egoism (Prudence). By contrast, a more Nietzschean concern is that a hedonistic Art of Life falsifies the self-interest iii (Prudence) of suffering creators, on the one hand, and favors painless cultural mediocrity (Ignobility), on the other. While Mill’s qualitative ranking of pleasures can block the second concern, his attendant commitment to a qualitative ranking of pains may appear to exacerbate the first. However, it is shown that the real concern should be that these qualitative rankings generate a de re commitment to a quasi- Schopenhauerian, and nihilistically negative, devaluation of the world. This conclusion is reinforced by an examination of Mill’s writings on religion and theodicy, which reveals Mill’s de dicto commitment to contradictory global evaluations of the world as such. This axiological contradiction at the heart of Mill’s Art of Life raises the question of whether his system should be reconstructed so as to resolve the contradiction by affirming or rejecting the global nihilistic devaluation. It may appear that Mill’s occasional optimism, and progressive political principles, require an anti-nihilistic axiological foundation. However, we see that the latter actually destabilizes his political synthesis, by generating an immanent rationale for allowing the promotion of higher culture to trump universal rights to security, thereby allowing Nobility to trump Morality in the Art of Life. By contrast, a nihilistic resolution of the contradiction provides a surprisingly strong foundation for his progressive political philosophy, and a route to reconciling Nobility with Morality. On the one hand, Mill’s theory of punishment renders a nihilistic devaluation of the world compatible with life-affirmation, and frees his Utilitarianism from having to ‘pass sentence on existence’. And on the other, a nihilistic devaluation opens the door to reconciling Mill’s robust defense of a universal right to security, and refusal to support slavery as a means to promoting higher culture, with his willingness to promote higher forms of life at the price of popular discontent, and restrictions on majoritarian democracy. If the highest pains outrank the highest pleasures, they devalue the world while opening the door to a form of Morality which prioritizes their minimization or elimination. However, this is also a form of Morality with the Nobility to promote the cultivation of individuals capable of the highest pleasures, when the only price to be paid consists of the ire, offense, or ressentiment of those Mill refers to as ‘the herd’. iv CONTENTS Abstract iii Acknowledgments xi INTRODUCTION: MILL’S ART OF LIFE AND SYSTEMATIC THOUGHT 1 CHAPTER 1: METHODOLOGICAL INTRODUCTION HISTORICAL PHILOSOPHY AND THE ART OF INTERPRETATION 12 Introduction: From the Art of Life to Interpretive Method PART I: Methodological Prolegomena 17 (A) First- and Second-Order Intellectual History 19 (A.1) The Belief-Claim Distinction 19 (A.2) Belief and Claim Attribution 22 (A.2.A) Skinner on Claim Attribution 23 (A.2.B) Belief Attributions and Metaphysical Interpretationalism 25 (A.3) Behavioral Patterns and Kinds of Belief 30 (A.4) Ideational Commensurability 37 (B) Historical Philosophy I: System Construction 38 (B.1) Brandom on Inferential Significance and Context 38 (B.2) De Dicto System Construction 40 (B.2.A) The Corpus as Inferential Context 40 (B.2.B) The Role of Formal Argumentation 43 (B.3) De Re System Construction 45 (B.3.A) De Re Attribution 46 (B.3.B) Cohen on Field Analysis and Philosophical Disagreement 47 (C) Historical Philosophy II: System Reconstruction 50 (C.1) From System Construction to System Reconstruction 50 (C.2) Evaluating Reconstructions 54 (C.3) System Reconstruction and ‘Man’s Preciousness to Man’ 57 v PART II: Thesis Summary 62 (A) Methodological Applications 63 (B) The Role of Mill’s Art of Life in his Philosophical System 69 CHAPTER 2: DE DICTO SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION I THE ELEMENTS OF MILL’S TELEOLOGICAL ETHICS 73 Introduction 73 (A) What is Hedonism? 75 (B) Motivational Hedonism 76 (C) Normative Hedonism I: Value, Welfare, and Happiness 79 (C.1) Value Hedonism and Welfare Hedonism 79 (C.2) Felicific Hedonism 81 (D) Mill’s Normative Epistemology 82 (E) Normative Hedonism II: Qualitative and Quantitative Value Hedonism 88 (E.1) Quantitative Hedonism 88 (E.2) Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism 90 (F) The Art of Life 97 (G) Utilitarianism and the Life of Morality 99 (H) Mill’s Formal Theory of Justice and Rights 103 CHAPTER 3: DE DICTO SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION II MILL’S PHILOSOPHY OF HIS MENTAL CRISIS 107 Introduction 107 (A) Doubts about the Intelligibility of Mill’s Account of his Mental Crisis 110 (A.1) The Individual Nihilism Objection to Hedonistic Monism 111 (A.2) The Specter of Nihilism in Mill’s Account of his Mental Crisis 112 (B) Alternative Methodological Approaches for Interpreting Mill’s Autobiography 115 (B.1) Reasons for Methodological Skepticism 116 (B.1.A) The Historical Unreliability of the Autobiography 116 (B.1.B) The ‘Joint Authorship’ of the Autobiography 117 (B.2) Autobiography as Political Theory 118 vi (C) Mill on the pursuit and attainment of goods 120 (C.1) The Eating-Fullness Analogy 123 (C.2) Seeking a Disanalogy 124 (C.2.A) Attempt 1 124 (C.2.B) Attempt 2 127 (C.3) The Feedback and Significance Theses 128 (C.4) The Role of Excellence and the Common Good 130 (C.5) Feedback, Higher Pleasure, and Meaning in Life 132 (C.6) The Solution to the Pursuit-Attainment Puzzle 133 (D) Mill’s Anti-Instrumentalism & Practical Anti-Hedonism 134 (D.1) The Logic of Anti-Instrumentalism 138 (D.2) The Logic of Practical Anti-Hedonism 140 (D.2.A) The Argument 140 (D.2.B) Formal Analysis 141 (D.3) Mill’s Anti-Instrumentalism & Practical Anti-Hedonism as a Response to his Crisis: A Provisional Explanation 142 (D.4) Mill on the Relationship between Happiness, Pleasure, and Objects 143 (D.4.A) Pleasure in Objects 144 (D.4.B) Aiming for Pleasure in Objects without Aiming for Happiness 145 (D.5) Instrumentalism and Practical Hedonism as Causes of the Crisis 151 (D.5.A) Hedonic Ineffectiveness 152 (D.5.B) Hedonic Counter-productiveness – the ‘Danger’ of Analysis 154 (E) Qualifying Mill’s Practical Hedonism and Opposition to Analysis 157 (E.1) Reasons for Interpretive Caution 158 (E.1.A) Falsehood 158 (E.1.B) Can people not be both happy and analytical? 158 (E.1.C) Does Mill recommend self-delusion? 158 (E.2) Qualifying Mill’s Practical Anti-Hedonism 159 (F) Mill’s Autobiography and his Art of Life 161 vii CHAPTER 4: DE DICTO SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION III MILLER’S ‘MARXIAN’ CRITIQUE OF MILL’S NORMATIVE EPISTEMOLOGY
Recommended publications
  • The "Urgrundrecht'?: Human Dignity, Moral

    The "Urgrundrecht'?: Human Dignity, Moral

    IS THE RIGHT TO LIFE OR IS ANOTHER RIGHT THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHT – THE “URGRUNDRECHT”?: HUMAN DIGNITY, MORAL OBLIGATIONS, NATURAL RIGHTS, AND POSITIVE LAW Josef Seifert Abstract: Moral obligations and basic human rights must be distinguished from each other and from positive rights and laws. Ethics and basic human rights rest on human dignity. The right to life is shown to be a natural and “absolute right,” but it is also in a certain sense the absolutely foundational concrete human right (Urgrundrecht) grounded in ontological dignity: all other human rights presuppose necessarily human life while human life has no more fundamental foundation in other goods but constitutes their ground. Other ideas about the most foundational right (such as the habeas corpus) are less foundational for the reason that they are more insignificant, can be suspended, are not immune to emergency states, such that their violation is not under all circumstances a grave violation. Moreover, they presuppose the right to life. These rights also refer only to a small sector of humanity, not applying to babies or comatose patients. The right to life is held by all human beings without exception, it is unrenounceable. For these and many other reasons the right to life is in an important sense the most fundamental right, in accordance with the first point of view for determining which is the most basic human right: Which right refers to the most basic good that is the condition of all others? However, there are two other points of view to determine the most basic right: The second point of view is expressed in the question: “Which human right is the most universal and comprehensive one and includes all others?” This is not true of the right to life which does not say anything about any other right.
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J

    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
  • Liberalism After Communitarianism1 Charles Blattberg Professor of Political Philosophy Université De Montréal Introduction

    Liberalism After Communitarianism1 Charles Blattberg Professor of Political Philosophy Université De Montréal Introduction

    Liberalism after Communitarianism1 Charles Blattberg Professor of Political Philosophy Université de Montréal Introduction Since the beginning of the modern age, there have been political thinkers who complain about its over-emphasis on the individual. Others have raised concerns about the dangers associated with too much community. One version of this dispute is reflected in the ‘liberal-communitarian debate’, which arose within anglophone political philosophy during the 1980s. The liberals were led by John Rawls, along with Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, and T.M. Scanlon. And the communitarian critique of their work was advanced by, among others, Alasdair MacIntyre, Michael Sandel, Charles Taylor, and Michael Walzer. As we might expect, since the publication of the writings of both groups, some have seen fit to declare one side or other of the debate the victor. But we should assume that none of the leading participants saw their exchanges in such merely competitive terms. After all, serious thinkers know that theirs is a higher – because ultimately philosophical – calling. We can understand the debate as arising primarily around Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (1999; originally published in 1971). The book defends what he considers to be the key principles of liberalism. To Rawls, we should endorse that political order which matches what rational citizens would freely choose from ‘the original position’. This is the perspective attained by stepping behind a hypothetical ‘veil of ignorance’, which conceals individuals’ knowledge of their capacities or social position. By imagining ourselves behind such a veil, we are said to be able to deliberate in a truly representative manner, and so ‘regard the human situation not only from all social but also from all temporal points of view’ (Rawls 1999: 514).
  • A Crossroads, Not an Island: a Response to Hanoch Dagan

    A Crossroads, Not an Island: a Response to Hanoch Dagan

    Michigan Law Review Online Volume 117 Article 9 2019 A Crossroads, Not an Island: A Response to Hanoch Dagan Zoë Hitzig Harvard University E. Glen Weyl RadicalxChange Foundation Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online Part of the Law and Economics Commons Recommended Citation Zoë Hitzig & E. G. Weyl, A Crossroads, Not an Island: A Response to Hanoch Dagan, 117 MICH. L. REV. ONLINE 117 (2019). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online/vol117/iss1/9 This Commentary is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review Online by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CROSSROADS, NOT AN ISLAND: A RESPONSE TO HANOCH DAGAN Zoë Hitzig* & E. Glen Weyl** Hanoch Dagan critiques Radical Markets for insufficient attention to the value of autonomy. While most of his concrete disagreements result from miscommunications, he appears sympathetic to a theory of autonomy that is more widespread, and deserves response. Human agency is fundamentally social, and individuality is primarily constituted by the unique set of social connections and identities one adopts. In this sense, flourishing individuals are crossroads of different communities, not self- sufficient islands. Beyond any welfarist benefits, a fundamental value of Radical Markets is that they aim to instantiate the social nature of identity and empower agency through diverse community. Obsessed, bewildered By the shipwreck Of the singular We have chosen the meaning Of being numerous.
  • Chastity As a Virtue

    Chastity As a Virtue

    religions Article Chastity as a Virtue Hwa Yeong Wang College of Confucian Studies and Eastern Philosophy, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Seonggyungwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03063, Korea; [email protected] Received: 26 April 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: This paper analyzes two philosophers’ views on chastity as a virtue, comparing Song Siyeol, a Korean neo-Confucian philosopher of the east, and David Hume, a Scottish philosopher. Despite the importance in and impact on women’s lives, chastity has been understated in religio-philosophical fields. The two philosophers’ understandings and arguments differ in significant ways and yet share important common aspects. Analyzing the views of Song and Hume helps us better understand and approach the issue of women’s chastity, not only as a historical phenomenon but also in the contemporary world, more fully and deeply. The analysis will provide an alternative way to re-appropriate the concept of chastity as a virtue. Keywords: chastity; Song Siyeol; David Hume; virtue; gender; Korean neo-Confucianism 1. Introduction Chastity, understood as a commitment or disposition to remain innocent of extramarital sexual intercourse, has been considered a virtue among human beings for a long time, not only in traditional societies but in contemporary societies as well.1 The value of chastity has been recognized since very early times and regardless of geographical location; it was an important virtue in ancient Greece and China, for example. This duty of chastity remains widespread in contemporary societies, which, in general, take monogamy as the moral standard regarding intimate human relationships. In a number of countries, the violation of chastity is recognized as unlawful and has consequences within the penal system.2 The virtue of chastity, however, has been discussed one-sidedly and almost always as “female” chastity.
  • Outstanding Universal Value Standards for Natural World Heritage

    Outstanding Universal Value Standards for Natural World Heritage

    Outstanding Universal Value Standards for Natural World Heritage A Compendium on Standards for inscriptions of Natural Properties on the World Heritage List IUCN Protected Areas Programme - World Heritage Studies About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world fi nd pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN works on biodiversity, climate change, energy, human livelihoods and greening the world economy by supporting scientifi c research, managing fi eld projects all over the world, and bringing governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,000 government and NGO members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 60 offi ces and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org This study is produced as part of IUCN’s role as advisory body to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention on natural heritage. IUCN Programme on Protected Areas Rue Mauverney 28 CH-1196 Gland Switzerland www.iucn.org/wcpa The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily refl ect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2008 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
  • Ecclesiology in the Church of England: an Historical and Theological Examination of the Role of Ecclesiology in the Church of England Since the Second World War

    Ecclesiology in the Church of England: an Historical and Theological Examination of the Role of Ecclesiology in the Church of England Since the Second World War

    Durham E-Theses Ecclesiology in the Church of England: an historical and theological examination of the role of ecclesiology in the church of England since the second world war Bagshaw, Paul How to cite: Bagshaw, Paul (2000) Ecclesiology in the Church of England: an historical and theological examination of the role of ecclesiology in the church of England since the second world war, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4258/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Ecclesiology in the Church of England: an historical and theological examination of the role of ecclesiology in the Church of England since the Second World War The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should i)C published in any form, including; Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent.
  • 40-Autumn 2003.Indd

    40-Autumn 2003.Indd

    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 40 / Autumn 2003 / £5.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Heir to the New Liberals? Ed Randall John Rawls Appreciation of a Liberal philosopher Patrick Jackson, Ian Crowe Biographies Loulou Harcourt and Edmund Burke J. Graham Jones ‘A real triumph for my old friend’ The Times fooled by Lloyd George interview Adrian Slade Architect of political realism Interview with David Steel David Boyle Hilaire Belloc and the Liberal revival Distributism revisited Liberal Democrat History Group TEN YEARS OF LIBERAL HISTORY his issue of the Journal of Our underlying aim has never How they Liberal History, number 40, really changed, though – to pro- used to look: Tmarks the tenth anniversary mote the study and research of Newsletter of the publication originally Liberal history, whether relating number 1, known as the Liberal Democrat to the Liberal Party, SDP, Liberal Newsletter History Group Newsletter, then the Democrats or, more broadly, 10 – our first Journal of Liberal Democrat History, British (and sometimes foreign) special, on and operating under its current Liberalism. We wanted both to ‘Liberals title since the beginning of 2003. remind party members of their and the First I think it is true to say that party’s history, and to promote World War’ those of us involved in launching its study and research – generally – and the the Liberal Democrat History a neglected topic – amongst all first Journal Group in 1988 – inspired by the those interested, whether aca- of Liberal Liberal History Group in the demics or not. Democrat pre-merger Liberal Party – had We hope you find the Journal History, no idea that we would end up of Liberal History helps you in one nunber 17.
  • Bringing Liberalism and Communitarianism Closer

    Bringing Liberalism and Communitarianism Closer

    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2001 Bringing Liberalism and Communitarianism Closer Paul Frazier Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Frazier, Paul, "Bringing Liberalism and Communitarianism Closer" (2001). Master's Theses. 5022. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/5022 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRINGING LIBERALISMAND COMMUNITARIANISM CLOSER by Paul Frazier A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Philosophy Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April2001 Copyright by Paul Frazier 2001 BRINGINGLIBERALISM AND COMMUNIT ARIANISM CLOSER Paul Frazier, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2001 The question that divides liberalism and communitarianism is: should the state exist to protect individuals and individual rights or for the good of society as a whole? This thesis suggests that this is the wrong question to ask. Individuals are not isolated and different fromtheir communities, but are products of social settings. This does not mean, however, that individual freedom and individual rights are compromised. Rather, the only way for an individual to be an autonomous agent and to make free choices is within a society. Rights for individuals, then, must come from within a social setting. Therefore, the individual is intertwined with a society and we cannot view a just society as simply focusingon one or the other.
  • No.406 1988-1989 the PETERITE

    No.406 1988-1989 the PETERITE

    THE PETERITE No.406 1988-1989 THE PETERITE 1988-1989 No. 406 Contents PAGE PAGE Commemoration 2 Cricket 32 G.C.S.E. Results 6 Rugby 35 ' David Cummin 8 Hockey 40 Senior Common Room 9 Boat Club 42 • Chapel 14 Tennis 44 The Weather 15 Squash 47 Careers 15 Cross Country . 49 Music 16 Netball 50 Community Service . 18 Swimming 52 Societies 19 Athletics 53 School Trip 21 Oxford Cup 54 Combined Cadet Force 22 Archives 55 House Notes 24 Old Peterite Club 58 Commemoration 1989 Head Master's Report It was Lord Melbourne, the young Queen Victoria's first prime minister, who said, 'It is tiresome to hear education discussed, tiresome to educate and tiresome to be educated'. Not a few of you may be tempted to agree with him as, at the end of another busy school year and in a rather stuffy Sports Centre, you see me once again rise to deliver my annual Commemoration report. However, I hope that you will not find the proceedings too tedious:, this is an important if final occasion in the school calendar which allows us to welcome honoured visitors, to be edified by our guest of honour's words, to thank those who have done so much to make the year successful and to note the many and varied achievements of our pupils in academic and in other areas. My first duty is to tell you of the Dean's regrets in being unable this year to preside at Commemoration. However, I I am thereby provided with the opportunity of thanking you, Mr.
  • Beyond Political Liberalism

    Beyond Political Liberalism

    Beyond Political Liberalism Toward a Post-Secular Ethics of Public Life Troy Dostert University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana © 2006 University of Notre Dame Press 00 dost (i-x/1-14) Final iii 9/13/06 2:20:04 PM Copyright © 2006 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dostert, Troy Lewis, 1968– Beyond political liberalism : toward a post-secular ethics of public life / Troy Dostert. p. cm. Based on the author’s thesis (doctoral)—Duke University. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. isbn-13: 978-0-268-02600-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-268-02600-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Political ethics. 2. Religion and politics. 3. Liberalism—Religious aspects. 4. Religious pluralism—Political aspects. I. Title. bj55.d64 2006 172—dc22 2006023895 ∞ The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. © 2006 University of Notre Dame Press 00 dost (i-x/1-14) Final iv 9/13/06 2:20:05 PM Introduction One of the most pressing dilemmas in contemporary political theory con- cerns how we should conceive of political life in light of the challenges posed by moral diversity. When citizens with widely divergent ethical or religious convictions clash in public debate, how can we approach such disagreements constructively? How can we work toward a stable and legitimate basis
  • ATINER's Conference Paper Series PHI2012-0180 Kant and The

    ATINER's Conference Paper Series PHI2012-0180 Kant and The

    ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: PHI2012-0180 Athens Institute for Education and Research ATINER ATINER's Conference Paper Series PHI2012-0180 Kant and the Categorical Imperative William O’Meara Professor of Philosophy James Madison University USA 1 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: PHI2012-0180 Athens Institute for Education and Research 8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece Tel: + 30 210 3634210 Fax: + 30 210 3634209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr URL Conference Papers Series: www.atiner.gr/papers.htm Printed in Athens, Greece by the Athens Institute for Education and Research. All rights reserved. Reproduction is allowed for non-commercial purposes if the source is fully acknowledged. ISSN 2241-2891 13/09/2012 2 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: PHI2012-0180 An Introduction to ATINER's Conference Paper Series ATINER started to publish this conference papers series in 2012. It includes only the papers submitted for publication after they were presented at one of the conferences organized by our Institute every year. The papers published in the series have not been refereed and are published as they were submitted by the author. The series serves two purposes. First, we want to disseminate the information as fast as possible. Second, by doing so, the authors can receive comments useful to revise their papers before they are considered for publication in one of ATINER's books, following our standard procedures of a blind review. Dr. Gregory T. Papanikos President Athens Institute for Education and Research 3 ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: PHI2012-0180 This paper should be cited as follows: O’Meara, W.