Chief Risk Officer — the New Domain for Actuaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chief Risk Officer — the New Domain for Actuaries Article from: Risk Management July 2005 – Issue 5 Risk Management Q July 2005 CRO Interviews Chief Risk Officer —The New Domain for Actuaries by Dorothy L. Andrews and Ken Seng Tan new frontier is unfolding on the geog- An Interview with Douglas W. raphy of insurance and it is yielding Brooks, FSA, FCIA, MAAA, A fertile ground for actuaries with tal- B.Math – Sun Life Financial ent, vision and a strong sense of responsibility. Risk management, sometimes called Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), and often inclusive of Operational Risk Management, is not a new concept to fields such as banking, manufacturing, informational technology and telecommunications. Even the armed forces have policies and procedures to mitigate opera- tional risks. So, why has it taken the insurance industry so long to recognize the need to install risk surveil- lance systems? And to appoint a team with full- time responsibilities to steer companies clear of activities that jeopardize the ability of insurer’s Dorothy L. Andrews, ASA, to make good on all those promises made to pol- MAAA, is second vice pres- icyholders? It may not be important to find the ident, risk management, Douglas W. Brooks attended the University of with Transamerica answers to these questions, but who is better Waterloo in mathematics and actuarial science, Reinsurance in Charlotte, suited to the task of risk management than actu- joining Mutual Life after graduation. At Mutual N.C. She can be reached aries—after all, studying and hedging risk Life (later Clarica), he spent a number of years at Dorothy.Andrews@ comes so naturally to us. However, we as actuar- in actuarial positions in group pension, comput- transamerica.com. ies no longer live in a world where C1, C2, C3 er systems and the individual division. In the in- and C4 risk can be our only focus. The environ- dividual division, he had increasing ment and our policyholders are more dynamic, responsibility for product design, pricing and with characteristics now studied using sophisti- dividends for individual insurance products, cated stochastic models. This alone charts the along with financial analysis and projections of course we must all follow into new territory and individual division products. He was heavily in- provides the impetus for developing effective volved with a number of acquisitions, including tools and prudent policies to mitigate risks that the acquisition of Prudential of England’s would adversely affect company value. Canadian business. This article is a conversation with four eminent In 1997, Brooks accepted a position as chief actuaries—Douglas Brooks of Sun Life actuary, overseeing the actuarial aspects of the Financial, Tony Coleman of Insurance Australia company’s demutualization, as well as the role Ken Seng Tan, ASA, Ph.D, Group, Beverly Margolian of Manulife Financial of the appointed actuary for the company. is Canada Research Chair and Craig Raymond of Hartford—discussing Additionally, he was involved with the acquisi- Associate Professor in their rise to the rank of Chief Risk Officer (CRO). tions of MetLife’s Canadian operation and Sun quantitative risk manage- The goal of this conversation is to guide others Life’s reinsurance business. In 2000, he was ment at the University of through the process of establishing CRO topogra- appointed senior vice president and chief ac- Waterloo in Ontario, phies in their companies. tuary, and added responsibilities for capital Canada. He can be reached management, risk management and internal at [email protected]. Let’s get started. audit. In June 2002, Brooks was appointed Q Page 4 July 2005 Q Risk Management vice president and CRO at Sun Life, upon the approaches to comprehensively measure and acquisition of Clarica, where he has accounta- manage on a consistent basis. bility for developing an enterprise-wide framework for risk management. 4. What is the mission statement of the of- fice of the CRO in your company? Brooks has acquired a number of industry in- The mission is to contribute to shareholder volvements, which include: involvement with value by providing a framework to ensure the or- actuarial education committees, the CLHIA ganization makes appropriate risk-adjusted committee on solvency and capital, and within business decisions. the Canadian Institute of Actuaries as a member of the CIA committee on the role of the 5. What do you see as your number one Appointed Actuary; past chairman of the Life challenge as CRO? Practice Committee of the Canadian Institute of Prioritization—putting the emphasis in the Actuaries; current chair of the CIA Committee areas that need the most attention while doing so on Risk Management and Capital as part of an integrated whole. Requirements and a member of the CIA’s Board of Directors, as well as leading a committee on 6. How would you describe the risk man- source of earnings disclosure. He is also on the agement function’s relationship with the Council of the SOA Risk Management Section. various business units in your company today? How has it evolved? What chal- Let’s look at his responses to our interview ques- lenges remain? tions: The company is operationally decentralized, and There“ are a number 1. It is clear that risk management is a its various businesses are quite different in nature much more important topic at your com- and business model. Therefore, what works in one of gaps inherent in pany today than several years ago. What business may not work in another. Building tech- traditional approaches do you see as the primary motivations for nical expertise in developing markets where re- to risk management, elevating the enterprise risk management sources are scarce and retention is challenging is function in your company? particularly difficult. which tend to be There are a number of reasons for the increased focused on individual 7. What risks get the most attention and importance of enterprise risk management. risks. These include the ever-increasing nature of both why? our products and the market instruments with Risks are prioritized based on assessments of which to hedge their risks, as well as an increas- probability and severity. The company has a lot ingly challenging regulatory environment. of equity exposure given its significant wealth ” management businesses and variable annuity 2. Who has sponsored the initiative? and segregated fund businesses. Legal and regu- Senior management and the board have spon- latory risk is also significant given the current en- sored the development of risk management as a vironment, particularly in the United States. function within the organization. 8. Creating a risk culture is part of the en- 3. How does your experience make the terprise risk management process. transition into this position easier, and Describe where your company is in the what gaps have you recognized? process, and what are some of the biggest Business experience is critical to building an ef- challenges? fective enterprise risk framework. There are a Culture is the single most important factor in the number of gaps inherent in traditional ap- success of enterprise risk management. Given the proaches to risk management, which tend to be sponsorship of risk management by the board and focused on individual risks. So, aggregation of senior management, there is a high level of risks and reflection of diversification is some- awareness of the importance of risk management. thing that hasn’t had a lot of attention or tools One challenge is to develop a “measure” of cul- with which to measure its impact. Operational ture to provide a basis for assessing improvement. risk is also an area that lacks tools and continued on page 6 Q Page 5 Q Risk Management Q July 2005 CRO Interviews Chief Risk Officer — The New 13. What type of reporting is routinely Domain for Actuaries done? What’s your vision for the future as Q continued from page 5 it relates to risk position reporting? We report on both financial and operational risks. 9. What functions are included in your port- This includes analysis of income sensitivities to folio of risk management responsibilities? market risks, as well as the effectiveness of hedg- The risk management function is accountable for ing programs and assessments of operational developing a framework within which all risks of risks. My vision would be to provide an overall pic- the organization are consistently measured. ture of the company’s risk profile, on a consistent These include financial risks, as well as opera- basis, with trending of key risk indicators. tional risks. The corporate role involves develop- ing the framework, communicating it, developing 14. What qualifications does someone tools if capabilities do not exist elsewhere and then need to function as a risk professional in monitoring and reporting on the management of your department? risks in the organization. Risk management requires different perspectives to be effective. The primary qualifications are an 10. Do you have a risk policy, and if so, understanding of the business and an inquiring what was your process for setting it up? mind—perhaps even healthy skepticism. Some We have a number of risk policies for the man- roles require specific technical expertise—actuar- agement of financial and operational risks, in- ial backgrounds are useful because of the training cluding risk tolerances. Policies are developed in the insurance-based businesses, but other skills “ by the corporate “function owners,” including I believe that risk add to the mix. risk management. management is a 15. What do you see as the future impot- vital function in any 11. What are some of the main regulatory tance and prospects for the office of the organization, guidelines you need to be cognizant of in CRO? performing your duties as CRO, or to what particularly financial I believe that risk management is a vital function extent does the Sarbanes-Oxely Act help to in any organization, particularly financial insti- institutions.
Recommended publications
  • Calpers Board Education Program Risk and Compliance
    CalPERS Board Education Program Risk and Compliance Bob Yetman University of California, Davis Outline • Setting the Stage – The Risk Management Process – Integrated Model: Three Lines of Defense – Board Oversight • Enterprise Risk Management – Strategy and Risk – Risk Models – Assessment • Compliance – Integrated Culture – Compliance Governance – Assessment 2 Setting the Stage: The Risk Management Process Setting the Stage: Board Oversight of the Risk Management Process • Boards are responsible for overseeing the processes and controls that reduce residual risk to acceptable levels • Discussion: What is residual risk? • Management is responsible for designing, implementing, and testing those systems • Part of a Board’s responsibility is to come to an understanding of whether Management’s risk processes and controls are satisfactory and sufficient 4 Risk Management • Risk can be thought of as the product of two dimensions: – The probability of a loss (likelihood) – The cost of a loss • A loss can be thought of as reductions in assets or increases in liabilities • Not all losses are financial • Discussion: Discuss some important risks for CalPERS – What is the probability? – What is the potential cost (financial and non-financial)? 5 The Three Lines of Defense 1: Operational – Day to day management and staff operations – Everyone plays a role, everyone owns a piece of internal control, not just the auditors 2: Risk Management and Compliance – Internal risk management structure and efforts (enterprise system) 3: Audit and Assurance – Internal
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Committee Charter
    RISK COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK CHARTER ~ ~ Supervising the Management of Risk of the Bank ~ ~ Main Responsibilities: • Approving the Enterprise Risk Framework (ERF) and related risk category frameworks and policies that establish the appropriate approval levels for decisions and other measures to manage risk to which the Bank is exposed • Reviewing and recommending the Bank’s Enterprise Risk Appetite Statement for approval by the Board and overseeing the Bank’s major risks as set out in the ERF • Reviewing the Bank’s risk profile and performance against Risk Appetite • Providing a forum for "big-picture" analysis of an enterprise view of risk including considering trends, and current and emerging risks Independence is Key: • the Committee is composed entirely of independent directors • the Committee meets regularly without management present • the Committee has the authority to engage independent advisors, paid for by the Bank, to help it make the best possible decisions on risk management Composition and Independence, Experience and Authority The Committee shall be composed of members of the Board of Directors in such number as is determined by the Board with regard to the by-laws of the Bank, applicable laws, rules and regulations and any other relevant consideration. In this Charter, “Bank” means The Toronto-Dominion Bank on a consolidated basis. No member of the Committee may be an officer or retired officer of the Bank. Every member of the Committee shall be independent of the Bank within the - 2 - meaning of applicable laws, rules and regulations and any other relevant consideration as determined by the Board of Directors, including the Bank’s Director Independence Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandate of the Chair of the Investment and Risk Management Committee
    MANDATE OF THE CHAIR OF THE INVESTMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Appointment La Caisse’s Board of Directors appoints one of the independent members of the Board to serve as Chair of the Investment and Risk Management Committee. The Chair of the Board may not be appointed Committee Chair. Role of the Chair The Committee Chair sees to the proper functioning of the Committee meetings. The Chair exercises leadership and rigour in the position’s functions so that the Committee can carry out its mandate. The Committee Chair ensures that all new members have the knowledge they require to exercise their functions on the Committee and offers them any required training. Main responsibilities The responsibilities of the Chair of the Investment and Risk Management Committee include: a) presiding at Committee meetings and ensuring that they are efficient and productive; b) seeking a consensus while encouraging frank, complete discussions; c) fostering a team spirit on the Committee; d) developing, in collaboration with the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Risk Officer and Head of Depositor Relationships and the Secretary, agendas for the Committee meetings; e) establishing, in advance and in collaboration with the Chair of the Board, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary, the annual schedule of Committee meetings; f) ensuring, in collaboration with the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Risk Officer and Head of Depositor Relationships and the Secretary, that the presentations and reports made
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Chief Risk Officer (CRO) on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Practices: Evidence from Malaysia
    International Business & Economics Research Journal – November 2010 Volume 9, Number 11 The Effect Of Chief Risk Officer (CRO) On Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Practices: Evidence From Malaysia Wan Norhayate Wan Daud, Universiti Darul Iman, Malaysia Ahmad Shukri Yazid, Universiti Darul Iman, Malaysia Hj Mohd Rasid Hussin, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia ABSTRACT This study investigates the level of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) adoption within the Public Listed Companies (PLCs) in Malaysia and the influence of Chief Risk Officers (CROs) on ERM practices. Included in this particular study is a comprehensive survey on 500 companies from the main board of public listed companies in the Malaysian Bourse. Key findings of this research work reveal that only 42% of the companies surveyed have completely adopted ERM and based on regression analyses, the „quality‟ of CROs has a strong influence on the level of ERM adoption within the PLCs involved in the survey. Keywords: Enterprise Risk Management, Quality of Chief Risk Officers, Corporate Governance 1 INTRODUCTION n this particular century, major corporations inevitably face an array of risks which also include operational risk, market risk, reputational risk and compliance risk, which appear to be receiving much attention to businesses and industries nowadays. In this regard, major corporations of Malaysia were also Ideeply affected by the poor management of risks during the Financial Crisis of 1997 (Yazid & Muda, 2006). Consequently, stakeholders‟ expectations for senior executives and board of directors to effectively manage all risks that face the company/organization tend to increase. In response to the increasing number and types of risks today‟s companies/organizations face, leading corporations in the United States (US) such as General Electric (GE), Wal-Mart, Bank of America and IBM, have all begun to adopt Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) for effective management of risks (Drew et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Compliance Corner by Compliance Professionals, for Compliance Professionals
    Compliance Corner By Compliance Professionals, For Compliance Professionals. The Intersection of Compliance and Enterprise Risk Management: Similarities, Differences, and Opportunities By Cyndi Baily, Medical Metrics Inc Over the past 15 years, the idea of what constitutes operations, and mission as well as reduce redundancies and an effective compliance program has changed. increase efficiencies in risk identification, management, and Historically, many organizations viewed compliance as a set prevention. of policies with in-person training delivered to employees. It wasn’t a program, it was a set of rules. The best tie in to the Similarities business was usually some input on the policies and participa- ERM and compliance have similar responsibilities, goals, and tion in the training. objectives. A common definition for ERM is: That was then. This is now. Modern compliance functions A process, effected by an entity’s Board of Directors, are expected to act as trusted advisors closely collaborating management and other personnel applied in strategy [sic] with the various business units in health care organization so setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify poten- that the compliance function can appropriately identify and tial events that may affect the entity, and manage risks to minimize compliance risk for the overall organization. be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance Similarly, over the last several years, the importance of enter- regarding the achievement of entity objectives.2 prise risk management (ERM) for U.S. organizations has devel- According to ASHRM, key components of a health care orga- oped and matured, primarily in response to a number of highly nization’s ERM strategy include identification and manage- public corporate scandals such as Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and ment of uncertainty, assessment of risk/readiness, employing others.
    [Show full text]
  • St Andrew's Group Risk Committee Charter
    Risk Committee Charter St Andrew’s Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd St Andrew’s Life Insurance Pty Ltd St Andrew’s Australia Services Pty Ltd Version 6.0 11 May 2021 RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER Approver Board of Directors – St Andrew’s Group of Companies Owner St Andrew’s Board & Company Secretary Functional Owner Company Secretary Hierarchy Classification Level 1 Policy Cross-referenced documents ICCAP Policy Reinsurance Policy Risk Appetite Statement Executive Management Committee Charter Revision History Version Approval Date Author Description 2 22 February Company Secretary Annual Revision of Policy and 2016 amendments to meet requirements of the BOQ Group Policy Framework 3 20 February Company Secretary Annual Revision of Policy and 2017 amendments to meet requirements of the BOQ Group Policy Framework 4 19 February Company Secretary Annual Revision of Policy 2018 5 17 July 2019 Company Secretary Annual Revision of Policy 6 19 February Company Secretary Revision of Policy following Governance 2020 Review 7 11 May 2021 Company Secretary Annual Revision of Policy RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER Contents 1 Scope ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Committee of the Board .......................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Committee .............................................................................................. 4 Objectives ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swissquote-Annual-Report-2020.Pdf
    ◚⯎ ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Financial Report Corporate Governance Report Remuneration Report Sustainability Report swissquote.com SWISSQUOTE IS NOT A TYPICAL SWISS BANK. Our history, ambition and DNA comes from the world of creativity, software develop- ment and the empowerment of investors. These values still remain central to Swissquote. Annual Report 2020 Key figures 2 Swissquote share 4 Our vision 6 Our values 8 Global offices 10 Report to the shareholders 12 FINANCIAL REPORT 16 Consolidated financial statements 20 Report of the statutory auditor on the consolidated financial statements 114 Statutory financial statements 119 Proposed appropriation of retained earnings 126 Report of the statutory auditor on the financial statements 127 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 130 REMUNERATION REPORT 166 Report of the statutory auditor on the Remuneration Report 190 Supplementary regulatory disclosures 191 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 196 Global offices 227 The Swiss leader in online banking www.swissquote.com Annual Report 2020 1 Key figures 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Number of accounts 410,248 359,612 329,100 309,286 302,775 % change 14.1% 9.3% 6.4% 2.2% 30.9% Net new money in CHFbn 5.3 4.6 3.1 2.7 6.1 % change 16.3% 46.3% 14.8% -55.3% 394.5% Client assets in CHFm ¹ 39,773 32,241 23,822 24,112 18,557 % change 23.4% 35.3% -1.2% 29.9% 54.7% Employees 805 722 662 593 550 % change 11.5% 9.1% 11.6% 7.8% 5.0% 1 Including assets that are not held for custody purposes, but for which the technology of the Group gives clients access to the stock market and/or that are managed by Swissquote.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Perspectives: Risk Oversight
    Board Perspectives: Risk Oversight Positioning the CRO for Success Issue 6 When it is appropriate for a chief risk officer (CRO) or an equivalent senior risk executive to be in place, Elements of Ineffective CRO Positioning both the board of directors and management – not to mention the company’s shareholders – have a stake • Not viewed as a peer with line-of-business in that executive’s success. Now is the time for the leaders in ALL respects organization to consider a fundamental question: Is • No direct reporting line to the board that executive, as well as risk management in general, • Belief by board, senior management and positioned to be successful within the organization? operations personnel that managing risk falls Key Considerations to a single person or function (versus an Like all C-suite executives, the CRO has a difficult organizational imperative) job. To be effective, he or she must have a prominent • Entangled in the minutiae of managing and meaningful voice in the C-level dialogue. At the compliance crucial moment when someone must play a contrarian • Constantly fighting turf issues with entrenched role to protect the shareholders’ interests, how can a silos CRO go against a CEO who holds all the cards rela- tive to the CRO’s career – progression, salary, bonus, • Risk management not valued as an equal etc.? And if the CEO doesn’t believe in the value of discipline to opportunity pursuit risk management – as was the case with some lead- • Risk management compensated based on ers of financial institutions with a business model that line-of-business results was all about volume and growth leading up to the • Risk management seen as a compliance financial crisis – it’s game over.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate and Risk Governance, Comptroller's Handbook
    Comptroller’s Handbook Safety and Soundness Capital Asset Sensitivity to Other Adequacy Quality Management Earnings Liquidity Market Risk Activities (C) (A) (M) (E) (L) (S) (O) Corporate and Risk Governance Version 2.0, July 2019 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Washington, DC 20219 Version 2.0 Contents Contents Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1 Risks Associated With Corporate and Risk Governance .............................................. 3 Strategic Risk .......................................................................................................... 4 Reputation Risk ....................................................................................................... 4 Compliance Risk ..................................................................................................... 4 Operational Risk ..................................................................................................... 5 Corporate Governance ............................................................................................................6 Board’s Role in Corporate Governance ........................................................................ 6 Board Composition, Qualifications, and Selection ................................................. 7 Leadership Structure of the Board .......................................................................... 9 Outside Advisors and Advisory Directors .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Risk & Regulation Summit
    7TH ANNUAL EARLY BIRD £1,399* register by RISK EMEA 2018 13 April FINANCIAL RISK & REGULATION SUMMIT TOPICS TO BE ADDRESSED IN 2018 24-25 APRIL | CITY OF LONDON KEYNOTE SESSIONS Regulation and Fragmentation | Liquidity | Geopolitical climate and Brexit NEW FOR 2018: INNOVATION IN RISK MANAGEMENT Blockchain & Cryptocurrencies | AI/Machine Learning | Strategic business models | FinTech | Cyber defenses | Payments landscape STRATEGIC BALANCE SHEET MANAGEMENT Regulation | Recovery and Resolution | TLAC and MREL | IFRS 9 | Capital | TRIM | Stress testing | Ring fencing HEAR FROM MORE THAN 60 CROs & HEADS OF RISK INCLUDING: CREDIT RISK VICTORIA SAPORTA MARC MEYER IAN ROBERTS EBBE NEGENMAN ANDREW EDWARDS Interest Rates | Financial crime | Counterparty credit risk Executive Director, Prudential Policy Chief Operations Officer Chief Credit Officer CRO CRO, Commercial Banking | Corporate loan market | Brexit | IRRBB | LGD | IFRS 9 Bank of England HSBC RBS Aegon Bank Lloyds Banking Group | IRB model | SA-CCR | CCPs MICHAEL SPITZ JEFF SIMMONS ED JENKINS JON HUGHES SUE KEAN CEO, Co Head of MD, Head of ERM Global Head of Wholesale Credit & Managing Director Chief Risk Officer PRE EVENT MASTERCLASS – APRIL 23 Blockchain/ DLT Lab Bank of Tokyo Market Risk Goldman Sachs Old Mutual Main Incubator GmbH, Mitsubishi UFJ HSBC Blockchain Bootcamp: Application in the Commerzbank Group financial industry SIMON GADD PHILIP BEST JAMES COULSON RORY CONWA ADRIAN BURBANKS Group CRO Wealth CRO Chief Compliance Officer Chief Compliance Officer EMEA Deputy Chief Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh Charter for the Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors
    FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF PITTSBURGH CHARTER FOR THE ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS January 2021 Purpose The Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“Committee”) is a committee of the Board of Directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh that assists the Board with the oversight of bank-wide risk and risk tolerance issues. The Committee promotes effective management of enterprise risks and is intended to work in tandem with the other Board committees that are assigned oversight of specific risks. The Committee oversees the Bank's enterprise risk management framework to determine if the resources and composition of risk activities are commensurate with the extent and complexity of the Bank’s business activities. In this role the Committee shall: Oversee an appropriate enterprise-wide risk management program that is commensurate with the Bank’s capital structure, risk appetite, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk-related factors; Receive and review regular reports from the Bank’s Chief Risk Officer. The Chief Risk Officer shall report regularly to the Committee on significant risk exposures and related controls, changes to risk appetite, risk management strategies, results of risk management reviews, and emerging risks. The Chief Risk Officer shall also report regularly on the Bank’s compliance with, and the adequacy of, its current risk management policies and procedures, and shall recommend any adjustments to such policies and procedures that he or she considers necessary or appropriate; Periodically review the capabilities for, and adequacy of resources allocated to, enterprise-wide risk management; Consider Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) implications when making risk decisions, even in those areas that are not traditionally associated with D&I.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization Structure and Enterprise-Wide Risk Management
    Organizing a Financial Institution to Deliver Enterprise-Wide Risk Management By Kaan H. Aksel PricewaterhouseCoopers Everyone seems to be talking about enterprise-wide risk management (ERM): boards of directors, management, regulators, the business press. It has achieved the status of a buzz word among financial institutions and even in other types of companies. The two underlying premises make sense: The first premise is that risks are often interrelated. Consider, for example, a bank that has an active program to securitize loans. As a result of securitization, the credit risk may decline, while the operational risks and risks to the bank’s reputation may increase. The second underlying premise of ERM is that risk management should be approached in a consistent, balanced, and integrated manner. The advantages to an integrated approach are many. First and foremost is the impact of enterprise-wide risk management on the bottom line. If ERM is effective, it should help reduce the volatility of the company’s earnings, thus enhancing shareholder value. With an organized approach to risk, a firm can better manage its risks and returns to make more informed decisions about capital and investments. For example, two different lines of business may have achieved equal profit at different levels of credit risk or operational risk; once the different risk levels are identified, they can become a factor in future strategic decisions. Much of the current dialogue about ERM focuses on two areas: systems to measure exposures across an organization and ways of measuring the integration of market and credit risk. Progress has been made along both of these lines.
    [Show full text]