DOCSLIB.ORG

Johnny Doo, NASA Working Group #4 [email protected] [email protected] 260 494 0891

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Johnny Doo, NASA Working Group #4 Rex@Five-Alpha.Com Jdoo@Ivr-Global.Net 260 494 0891 Rex Alexander CC: Johnny Doo, NASA Working group #4 [email protected] [email protected] 260 494 0891 Again, I must say, I am jealous of what you have done, and will do, over the next 20 years. BUT… to help YOUR career, I offer the following for your consideration and benefit: 1) Regarding anything and everything VTOL… the highest, top-level issue is the bottom line COST of: development, acquisition, MAINTENANCE, guaranteed operation, piloting, insurance to cover failures, and PUBLIC OPINION. 2) The KEY point of this new tech, in this world run by President Trump (especially in his re-election… no matter what YOUR political orientation is) is: The key point is that anything (EVERYTHING) we must do has to be to generate massive, game changing, blue-collar/unionized-labor population employment increases (defining the world overpopulation), building stuff for EXPORT, going to places where “Global Warming” climate change will happen, but where they will not have the funds, or talents, to deal with all the problems it will certainly bring… E-VTOL is NOT for Billionaire executives in San Jose to move their bodies faster in their aero-taxicabs, jumping over all those who must drive to work… THAT is the worst form of “first mission” application of radical new tech and will guarantee the doom of the URBAN Mobility focus of all this stuff… THERE IS NO MARKET for the dreams of a few billionaires, who are funding this stuff to cover the first $100 billion needed to make that URBAN taxi stuff mentality (UAM) work… RATHER, there will be a trillion dollar/year market for the EXPORT of lots of CHEAP VTOL “vehicles” (not “commercial aircraft” for human mobility) to deal with: wildfires, hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, jungles, floods, swamps, droughts, desert-sand- dune movements, mountain (land slide) avalanches, riots, famine, mass starvations, pandemics, massive unmanaged migrations of the poorest-of-the-poor, most of whom think dying in any war gets them to heaven faster. Global CLIMATE CHANGE is GOOD (for future of E-VTOLs). We, (VTOLers) are the solution to that unstoppable problem, not by replacing jet-fuel with battery packs, but by redirecting “AVIATION” to “hover”. Climate change will certainly happen; (it certainly did to get the monkeys out of the trees and learn to run on their hind legs between African grass land wild fires 3 million years ago and eat burnt bison), and always has, and will always massively affect life on this planet. There is NO way to prevent, or reverse, the warming of our air/ocean/land masses. So, therefore, VTOLs are to deal with REAL emergencies and tragedies, and not make this crowded, over-populated, mega-urbanized, global economy run faster and faster and farther and farther… If we get the right VTOLs developed, the world will DE-URBANIZE… and people will live in entirely new ways. We no longer need to travel from A to B faster since we have optical fiber, 5G communications, super resolution massive displays to digitally simulate classrooms, retail stores, business offices and MOST of what the world’s government offices do with rather useless people.. (Pushing bits around from one terminal to another). So… when YOU are on the positive side of this stuff, please rant loud and clear that we are building a new industry that is labor intensive, for making products that are cheap (due to obvious, radical technologies) to be exported, or even assembled anywhere in the world. THAT is the killer POSITIVE BOTTOM LINE Economics and Politics!!!! 3) GOD (Generators Of Diversity) gave us VTOL technology, not to go farther, faster from A to B… and also: NOT just to TAKE OFF… from some Vertiport…(yet to operate under standards that you know better than most) … The key, mind-blowing human benefit of going VERTICAL is the HOVER function… and especially for the few minutes in prep to LAND… ANYWHERE, (assuming it can be nearly silent with no Jet-turbine based E-power generator). ANY landing is a good landing… especially if you really don’t need all that “infrastructure” that was created for winged vehicles that crash to the ground when they stop going forward… AGAIN, it is NOT about TAKING OFF quickly, it is all about LANDING in a small space, when/ where needed… It is NOT about LANDING at an FAA/City- Gov. approved Vertiport at some hospital… It is about landing within 100 feet of a disaster event area (people drowning, generating pandemic body counts, just after the bullets stop in a Hong Kong riot of college students)… I live about a mile from a major hospital with a certified chopper landing “pad” and almost never hear a chopper flying over my place which is in a direct flight line to the big city. Seldom does a chopper bring in hurting people; mostly it is for some richer guy going from THIS hospital to some better hospital for extra-special treatments. So… the focus must be on the REASON for flying in the first place, and THAT is to HOVER over something with guaranteed certainty of available flight time, aero-stability in bad weather, very high traffic locations and times… AGAIN, the “V” is for LANDING, not taking off… that should massively affect the definition of everything you can say about “INFRASTRUCTURE”… Excuse me for thinking in terms that you are an expert, (also I hate “vertiports”) 4) Now for the real reason I write this: Sitting on my bathroom porcelain throne this AM, I found the answer to your question about getting HYDROGEN into the “infrastructure” (especially if done in a big city context)… and my ANSWER is based on the design of the craft. In all planes I have flown in: Cessna 172, DC-3, Piper Cherokee, and even an unmaxed 737, the issue of defining everything is based on how much FUEL (over-riding the cargo/payload stuff) you have, how fast it burns away, and how far you can go, and ESPECIALLY how long you can stay in the air near your destination…. SO… the key solution to the Hydrogen fuel delivery issue is the design of a craft that was based from the git-go on a MASSIVE amount of FUEL, (and not how many bodies can be crammed into those uncomfortable seats). Re VTOL, the crafts should not be based on brain-dead battery power, that when it goes OUT… it’s game over. They should be based on VERY LARGE tanks of fuel (really CHEAP fuel eventually), that are NOT designed with the problem of their volumetric space demands that can screw with drag and lift and airspeed, and CG changes, and availability of refueling (in flight or at some ground port). The killer of all that you know about UAM is that FAST recharging of expensive batteries that have very limited life times (re flights before replacement) is a BAD idea (since the VERTIPORTS are NOT filled with hangars like most of the general aviation airports I have flown from). Translating this into the solution… if Hydrogen is the idea fuel (mostly for its energy content per KILO) then there is no reason not to design a craft from scratch that carries 100 times more H2 than needed for a single mission objective. NOT just 5-10 gallons of liquid H2 (good for many Public Service mission statements), but up to 1,000 gallon equivalents of liquid H2 for the NEXT concept of a VTOL… That is: the refueling is done like my car, once a week, and NOT per flight… since the craft could/should be in the air for 12 hours continuously, far from some H2 liquid gas station… So, when H2-based , fuel cell power feeds a smaller pack of batteries, and ultra-capacitors and Cryogenically cold electrical energy storage techniques using super-conducting magnets. And rather than having some emergency parachute strong enough to help a VTOL that is in trouble, the damn craft could have an inflatable bladder that could provide a small H2 buoyancy+ (lift) that keeps the craft in air and off the ground. BUT, I assume you were also thinking that liquid H2 is very expensive, and has to be trucked around to the Vertiport filling stations (not at all VERTIPORTS IMHO)… H2 has to be made from electrocution of water, with the electricity coming from environmental energy (wind/solar)… being generated continuously, and in volumes way beyond the need for several weeks of flight capabilities… HENCE the key NEW tech has to be about how the VTOL vehicle stores hundreds of gallons of H2… hence the importance of CRYOGENIC FLUX CAPACITOR thinking. 5) The BIG DEAL for me about H2, is that in any of those climate change caused mission requirements, referred to above, the first thing to go down is the grid based power line, hence no plug-in Epower to run pumps to transfer petroleum based fuels to feed old tech trucks to haul loads, (or recharge all those electric car/aircraft batteries). My most important experience was in 1968, flying around the Amazon jungle (as a fake co-pilot) in a DC-3 that was more a cargo vehicle, bringing petroleum fuel in 55-gal drums, to power motor cycles deep in the jungle. That was in 1968, GOT IT??? YET, even then I knew that for lots of flights in the jungle, a NEW fuel concept has to be the source of energy to fly from one river over to another in some VTOL like craft. Do-it-yourself FUEL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Java Based Distributed Learning Platform
    Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering A 5 (2016) 580-598 D doi:10.17265/2162-5298/2016.11.006 DAVID PUBLISHING The Environmental and Ethical Issues of Nuclear Power and Ionizing Radiation Hayrettin Kilic The Green Think Tank of Turunch Foundation, Hoboken, N.J 07030, USA Abstract: As we enter the new millennium, population explosion, increasing worldwide energy demands and rapid global increase in ionizing radiation are all now threatening our fragile environment like no other time in known history. There is an urgent need for research and education to focus on the complex and direct link between ionizing radiation and its irreversible impact on the environment. Hence, nuclear energy and ionizing radiation issues can no longer be viewed in isolation. Historical facts and official reports prove that a code of ethics did not previously exist in nuclear industry: the risks of ionizing radiation are too great and unpredictable. Elimination of existing man-made ionizing radiation sources in this century is untenable and unsustainable. The intent of this paper is to review and demonstrate that „Atoms for Peace‟ is a false and unethical enterprise, and offers insights into the social and ethical aspects of ionizing radiation as a result of nuclear power development. The unethical nature of nuclear weapons, along with risk perception and ethical dilemmas of atom for peace, nuclear weapon tests, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the International Court of Justice‟s opinion and the World Economic Forum-Global Risk Landscape will be discussed. Key words: Nuclear energy, ethical issues, ionizing radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal, Summer 2017, Volume 31, No. 2
    SUMMER 2017 Volume 31, No. 2 AFRP 10-1 Features Improving Resource Management in the Afghan Air Force ❙ 4 Lt Col Jonathan D. Ritschel, USAF Ms. Tamiko L. Ritschel The Coming Close Air Support Fly-Off ❙ 17 Lessons from AIMVAL–ACEVAL Lt Col Steven Fino, PhD, USAF Break the Paradigm ❙ 39 Prepare Airpower for Enemies’ “Most Likely Course of Action” H. Mark Clawson Critical Thinking Skills in USAF Developmental Education ❙ 52 Col Adam J. Stone, USAF Departments 68 ❙ Views Toward a US Air Force Arctic Strategy ❙ 68 Col John L. Conway III, USAF, Retired The Last Prop Fighter ❙ 82 Sandys, Hobos, Fireflies, Zorros, and Spads Maj Gen Randy Jayne, USAF, Retired Data You Can Trust ❙ 91 Blockchain Technology Col Vincent Alcazar, USAF, Retired Defeating Small Civilian Unmanned Aerial Systems to Maintain Air Superiority ❙ 102 Lt Col Thomas S. Palmer, USAF Dr. John P. Geis II, Colonel, USAF, Retired 78 ❙ Commentary Social Media and the DOD ❙ 119 Benefits, Risks, and Mitigation Lt Col Dieter A. Waldvogel, USAF, PhD Editorial Advisors Dale L. Hayden, Director, Air Force Research Institute Lt Gen Bradley C. Hosmer, USAF, Retired Prof. Thomas B. Grassey, US Naval Academy Lt Col Dave Mets, PhD, USAF, Retired, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (professor emeritus) Reviewers Dr. Christian F. Anrig Col John Jogerst, USAF, Retired Swiss Air Force Navarre, Florida Dr. Bruce Bechtol Col Wray Johnson, USAF, Retired Angelo State University School of Advanced Warfighting Marine Corps University Dr. Kendall K. Brown NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Mr. Charles Tustin Kamps USAF Air Command and Staff College Col Steven E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications ISSN NUMBER: 2407-9677 - DOI: 10.30958/Ajmmc Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 Download the Entire Issue (PDF)
    The Athens Journal of (ATINER) Mass Media and (ATINER) Communications Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020 Articles Front Pages HÉRICA LENE & FRANCISCA DA SILVA The Indiciary Paradigm as Methodology for Researches in Brazilian History of Communication JUDITH SYLVESTER President Trump and the Mother of All Bombs – Quickly Forgotten GRACE IEMBER ANWEH Gender Roles Representation in Television Advertisements: Implications for the Nigerian Girl-Child and Role Modelling TUONG-MINH LY-LE How Vietnamese Stakeholders View Current SocialMedia Use in Crisis Communication in Vietnam i ATHENS INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH A World Association of Academics and Researchers 8 Valaoritou Str., Kolonaki, 10671 Athens, Greece. Tel.: 210-36.34.210 Fax: 210-36.34.209 Email: [email protected] URL: www.atiner.gr (ATINER) Established in 1995 (ATINER) Mission ATINER is a World Non-Profit Association of Academics and Researchers based in Athens. ATINER is an independent Association with a Mission to become a forum where Academics and Researchers from all over the world can meet in Athens, exchange ideas on their research and discuss future developments in their disciplines, as well as engage with professionals from other fields. Athens was chosen because of its long history of academic gatherings, which go back thousands of years to Plato’s Academy and Aristotle’s Lyceum. Both these historic places are within walking distance from ATINER’s downtown offices. Since antiquity, Athens was an open city. In the words of Pericles, Athens“…is open to the world, we never expel a foreigner from learning or seeing”. (“Pericles’ Funeral Oration”, in Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War).
    [Show full text]
  • 7/5/77 [1] Folder Citation: Collection
    7/5/77 [1] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: 7/5/77 [1]; Container 29 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff%20Secretary.pdf THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON July 1, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO THE PRESIDENT FROM: ACHSAH NESMITH SUBJECT: Presidential Medal of Freedom You made me very proud when you chose Dr. King for your first Medal of Freedom. Your choices this time return this award to its proper place as the highest civilian award this nation gives. When I wrote a memo suggesting Dr. King I was told he had died too long ago, but I'm glad in this case you decided not to let past oversights keep you from doing some­ thing that sould have been done long ago. Not long before Ralph McGill died he told me that he wished I had succeeded in persuading them in 1966 to go with you, that would have been the right thing to do. I don't thing he ever said that to many people because he was bound in that election by old loyalties and he was not a man to turn his back on people in hindsight. But it meant a lot that he said it to me, because he meant a lot to me. He was one of the recipients of this award who gave it honor in the past, I think, and I believe he would have been proud that a Georgia-born President gave it to a fellow-Georgian in this case. I was proud to have been able to write the draft citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)
    I MODERN COMBAT AIRCRAFT (1945 – 2010) Modern Combat Aircraft (1945-2010) is a brief overview of the most famous military aircraft developed by the end of World War II until now. Fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters are presented by the role fulfilled, by the nation of origin (manufacturer), and year of first flight. For each aircraft is available a photo, a brief introduction, and information about its development, design and operational life. The work is made using English Wikipedia, but also other Web sites. FIGHTER-MULTIROLE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed General Dynamics 001 1944 3 011 1964 27 P-80 Shooting Star F-111 Aardvark Republic Grumman 002 1946 5 012 1970 29 F-84 Thunderjet F-14 Tomcat North American Northrop 003 1947 7 013 1972 33 F-86 Sabre F-5E/F Tiger II North American McDonnell Douglas 004 1953 9 014 1972 35 F-100 Super Sabre F-15 Eagle Convair General Dynamics 005 1953 11 015 1974 39 F-102 Delta Dagger F-16 Fighting Falcon Lockheed McDonnell Douglas 006 1954 13 016 1978 43 F-104 Starfighter F/A-18 Hornet Republic Boeing 007 1955 17 017 1995 45 F-105 Thunderchief F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Vought Lockheed Martin 008 1955 19 018 1997 47 F-8 Crusader F-22 Raptor Convair Lockheed Martin 009 1956 21 019 2006 51 F-106 Delta Dart F-35 Lightning II McDonnell Douglas 010 1958 23 F-4 Phantom II SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No.
    [Show full text]
  • E:\D Drive\Subhash Yadav\Center
    NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS NUCLEAR SECURITY: A FORTNIGHTLY NEWSLETTER FROM CAPS Vol 13, No. 7, 01 Feb 2019 OPINION – Bhopinder Singh Hype and Scepticism Prevails over China’s New CONTENTS ‘Mother of All Bombs’ OPINION All global conflicts since the Second World War NUCLEAR STRATEGY have necessitated the exclusive deployment of BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE “conventional” weapons. The psychology of sovereign power fuels the quest for developing NUCLEAR ENERGY the “big-bigger-biggest” phenomenon in weapons NUCLEAR COOPERATION among the most powerful militaries in the world. URANIUM PRODUCTION Even though the operational nuclear weapons and NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION technology have been around since the 1940s, NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT the global non-proliferation treaties and non-use commitments have ensured that the parallel NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT development of “conventional” weaponry that still skirts the various provisions, deterrence and All global conflicts since the Second World War protocols on nuclear weapons usage, continues have necessitated the exclusive deployment of unabated. “conventional” weapons. Even though the operational nuclear The obvious race to While China and India have weapons and technology have been develop the most powerful pledged a NFU stand on around since the 1940s, the global non- non-nuclear-bomb had led nuclear weapons, the more proliferation treaties and non-use to the famous “Daisy belligerent states like commitments have ensured that the Cutter”, or the BLU-82, in Pakistan, Israel and North parallel development of “conventional” the US. This 6.8-ton high- Korea have declined to weaponry that still skirts the various intensity monstrosity was commit to a “NFU” stand, provisions, deterrence and protocols extensively airdropped in as a means to posture on nuclear weapons usage, continues the conflict zones of aggressive-deterrence unabated.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermobaric Weapon
    Thermobaric weapon From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Explosive that uses oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a high-temperature explosion Blast from a US Navy fuel–air explosive used against a decommissioned ship, USS McNulty , 1972 A thermobaric weapon, aerosol bomb, or vacuum bomb[1] is a type of explosive that uses oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a high-temperature explosion. In practice, the blast wave typically produced by such a weapon is of a significantly longer duration than that produced by a conventional condensed explosive. The fuel–air explosive (FAE) is one of the best-known types of thermobaric weapon. Most conventional explosives consist of a fuel–oxidizer premix (black powder, for example, contains 25% fuel and 75% oxidizer), whereas thermobaric weapons are almost 100% fuel, so thermobaric weapons are significantly more energetic than conventional condensed explosives of equal weight. Their reliance on atmospheric oxygen makes them unsuitable for use underwater, at high altitude, and in adverse weather. They are, however, considerably more destructive when used against field fortifications such as foxholes, tunnels, bunkers, and caves—partly due to the sustained blast wave and partly by consuming the oxygen inside. Many types of thermobaric weapons can be fitted to hand-held launchers.[2] Contents • 1 Terminology • 2 Mechanism • 2.1 Fuel–air explosive • 2.1.1 Effect • 3 Development history • 3.1 German developments • 3.2 Soviet and Russian developments • 3.3 U.S. developments • 3.4 BEAC Spanish thermobaric bomb project • 4 History • 4.1 Military use • 4.2 Terrorist use • 5 See also • 6 References • 7 External links Terminology[edit] The term thermobaric is derived from the Greek words for "heat" and "pressure": thermobarikos (θερμοβαρικός), from thermos (θερμός), hot + baros (βάρος), weight, pressure + suffix -ikos (-ικός), suffix - ic.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form for FY11
    2011 ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM (Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2011) CORPORATE OFFICE 8585 Chemin Côte-de-Liesse Saint-Laurent, Québec June 16, 2011 Canada H4T 1G6 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CORPORATE STRUCTURE OF CAE ..................................................................................4 1.1 Name, Address and Incorporation ..................................................................................4 1.2 Inter-corporate Relationships..........................................................................................5 2. OVERVIEW OF CAE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ITS BUSINESS ...........................5 2.1 Overview.........................................................................................................................5 2.2 Geographic and Segment Revenues and Locations ........................................................7 2.3 CAE’s vision...................................................................................................................9 2.4 Our strategy and value proposition ...............................................................................10 2.5 Industry Overview and Trends......................................................................................16 2.6 Research and Development...........................................................................................17 2.7 Production and Services................................................................................................20 2.8 Specialized Skills and Knowledge................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Endowment-2016-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT IMPACT Contents 5 Joint Letter from the Chairman of the Board and the President and CEO 6 Advancing the Long Blue Line 10 Developing Leaders of Character and Courage 12 Falcon Stadium Renovation 14 Graduate Support 17 Year in Review 20 Academic Support 22 Financial Summary 24 Board of Directors 3 Thousands of graduates, family and friends share a commitment to the Air Force Academy and its mission to shape and train officers of character whose lives reflect the Core Values of Integrity First, Service Before Self, and Excellence in All We Do. Through generous, private philanthropy, Academy supporters like you have stood behind our cadets, increasing the margin of excellence that helps them become successful Air Force officers, joining the ranks of the Long Blue Line. 4 5 6 LETTER from the Board Chair & CEO The Air Force Academy is a unique proving ground for young men and women who aspire to serve as officers in the United States Air Force. It’s a first tier academic institution that challenges cadets to excel and prepares them to apply the knowledge they acquire in the modern profession of arms. The Academy is a cherished alma mater for thousands of graduates who endured to follow the Long Blue Line. The USAFA Endowment is proud to serve The Academy must always be as a conduit of support for many projects and programs that enhance the margin of ready to sharpen its academic focus excellence that keeps the Academy on top and change direction quickly to as a military training ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Warning Newsletter July 2019
    Early Warning July 2019 Taylor Fravel Named Director of the MIT Security Studies Program After 13 years as SSP Director, Barry Posen will be stepping down and Taylor Fravel, Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science, will be taking over the role. Fravel studies international relations, with a focus on international security, China, and East Asia. Posen will continue his research and teaching responsibilities at MIT, and he will continue leading the Grand Strategy, Security, and Statecraft Fellows Program. SSP Senior Congressional and Executive Branch Staff Seminar This year, the Security Studies Program hosted its 20th annual Senior Congressional and Executive Branch Staff Seminar from April 17-19, 2019. “Regions and Rivals: American Strategy in a Time of Uncertainty” marked this year’s theme, focusing on the current political and geographical unrest across the various hot spots across the globe. Outside experts, along with MIT faculty examined the nuclear and geographical threats affecting US interests. The seminar brought 25 staffers, representing the U.S. House and Senate, along with analysts from the Congressional Research Service, the Department of State, and the Department of Defense to MIT’s campus to take part in the intensive three-day seminar. Keynote speakers included Kathleen Hicks, Senior Vice President, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, Director, International Security Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and Karl Eikenberry, Director, U.S.-Asia Security Initiative, Stanford University. The group also visited Lincoln Lab for a tour and briefings on various initiatives. A more extensive report will be included in the upcoming SSP annual report which is expected to be published in early fall.
    [Show full text]
  • President Trump and the Mother of All Bombs – Quickly Forgotten
    Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications- Volume 6, Issue 1 – Pages 23-42 President Trump and the Mother of All Bombs – Quickly Forgotten By Judith Sylvester When the United States military dropped the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) in Nangarhar Province in Afghanistan in April 2017 both the news media and social media also blew up – but only for a couple of weeks. Nicknamed the "Mother of All Bombs," MOAB is the largest non-nuclear bomb ever dropped in combat. It literally came out of the blue, shocking not only the tunnels in Afghanistan it was meant to destroy, but briefly the entire world. Donald Trump was in his first 100 days as president of the United States. Because President Trump took no credit for the decision to drop MOAB, whether the action was taken for military or political purposes remains an open question. International media were more graphic in their description of the bomb’s destruction and provided more reactions from Afghan leaders. As many as 95 ISIS fighters were reported killed, with no civilians reported killed. US media that support President Trump reported the use of MOAB in more patriotic terms than less supportive media. A Crimson Hexagon software analysis of social media posts reveal that "fear" was the overwhelming emotion expressed. Twitter was the No. 1 source of comments. International sources were more likely than American sources to predict that a new, non-nuclear weapons race among major world military powers, would result. Keywords: Afghanistan, bomb, Massive Ordnance Air Blast, Trump Introduction When the United States military dropped the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) in Nangarhar Province in Afghanistan on April 13, 2017, both the news media and social media also blew up.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History Jun 2017
    Page 1 A Quarterly Publication JUNE 2017—ISSUE NO. 13 U3A NUNAWADING MILITARY HISTORY GROUP Battle of Passchendaele (Third Ypres) 2017 Program for Term 2 & Part 3 Thu, 1 Albert The Crusades an After mid-1917, and following mutinies in the over-strained French Army, the British Forces had to assume an June Isaacs Alternative View even greater role in the war on the Western Front. For Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig, the British commander- in-chief, this provided an opportunity to launch an offensive that he had long wanted. Attacking from Ypres in Thu, 8 Ian Military Conse- Belgium, he planned to drive the Germans from the surrounding dominant ridges and even hoped to reach the June Taylor quences of Code Belgian coast. Following on the success at Messines in June, he unleashed his great attack on 31 July 1917. Breaking Fighting went on, often in appalling weather and despite crippling losses, until November. Finally, with the army Thu, Reg Mystery Topic stuck in muddy fields churned up by the artillery fire, the bloody offensive came to an untidy close. Many would 15 Roberts afterwards call this offensive, actually a series of battles, after the name of the village that had become the last June objective – 'Passchendaele'. MENIN ROAD AND POLYGON WOOD Thu, Brian Life and Times of The Australian infantry divisions joined the Third Battle of Ypres which had been going on since 31 July when 22 Mates a War PHotogra- they took part in the battle of Menin Road on 20 September 1917. Fortunately a change in the weather brought June pher for them better fighting conditions.
    [Show full text]