Lindsey Lightowler
From: Tony Serjeant Sent: 14 September 2020 12:41 To: Paul Martinson Cc: Vanessa Jackson; Planning Subject: R/66/93A Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, DL8 4TX
Paul,
Thank you for re-consulting me recently on this application. My views remain the same as those expressed in my response made to you on 12 February 2020.
Regards,
Tony
Tony Serjeant Senior Wildlife Conservation Officer Direct: 01756 751627 Switchboard: 0300 456 0030
Website Facebook Twitter
Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Colvend | Hebden Road | Grassington Skipton | North Yorkshire | BD23 5LB
1 Gail Dent
From: Aidan Ball-Albessard Sent: 20 August 2020 11:44 To: Paul Martinson; Planning Cc: Gaby Rose Subject: Planning Consultation - Application R66/93A at Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, DL8 4TX
Hi Paul/ Planning,
Parish folder:\\yorkshiredales\ydnpadata\Planning\Parishes\Carlton Highdale R66\093\93A
Photos: X:\Planning\Parishes\Carlton Highdale R66\Photo Library\Ings barn coverdale
Heritage Significance
c.1848
1 1892
1910
Ing Lathe was possibly built in the first half of the 19th century. It is shown on the OS maps with a different (smaller) extension to the east than exists today. The current rear extension was built after 1910 in 2 traditional solid-wall construction, so most likely in the first half of C20. There is a ‘shelf’ of protruding stones to the left part on the roadside (original) elevation; their function is unclear, and the Streetview photos do not show a blocked opening underneath. It looks like the masonry has been repointed in recent years – this may have covered up some evidence also. There is a blocked up opening on the roadside towards the centre of the elevation that could possibly have been an ‘entrance’, although it is very unlikely that the road level would have as low as the GF level of the barn. The existing opening on this elevation was a forking hole which was later inserted (jamb stones don’t relate to coursing of masonry). The north east elevation has a larger FF taking-in door which looks original (no obvious disturbance in the masonry). Internally on the south (former external) wall of the original barn there were two openings making it a Type C barn – one door would have lead to the shippon, the other to the hay mew. The current extension was built to increase the size of the shippon.
Proposals • Rooflights - the current number and layout of the rooflights would have a negative visual impact on the barn. The rooflight above proposed bedroom 3 is not justified because of the light provided by the taking-in door. The rooflight above the proposed stair would be harmful in particular as it would be highly visible from the road; the staircase does not require natural daylight. The third rooflight above the extension is also not justified as the room has 3 windows; moreover, the door can also be used as a source for daylight. • Enlarge southeast [west on drawing is incorrect] windows – the plans show two windows enlarged on this elevation. This would have an unnecessary harmful impact on the heritage significance of the barn, as the agricultural openings would be changed to domestic-proportion windows. Repairs/ replacements should match the existing windows. • Partially reinstating blocked opening with a half window - this would harm the readability of the barn as the blocked opening is already ‘incomplete’, and the proposed works would fragment it more, so it would become very unreadable. If they want to make use of it, they need to unblock the whole thing and employ an opaque panel to the top (like on gable elevation, but the other way round) • Inserting new GF window to north east gable – The would have a negative impact on the heritage significance as it confuses how the barn was used. The double-storey mews would only have an intake hole on the FF. • Altering ground level to north east – this would have a negative impact because the barn built into the hillside is a key feature to how the barn functioned. The slope would have provided a practical level to fork hay, clear waste etc. • Inserting door to north east elevation of extension – this is not justified as there is already an opening to the extension. The loss of masonry and introduction of a new feature would be harmful to the significance of the barn. • Insertion of flue to rear – acceptable • Creation of new boundary walling – this has a very negative impact on the heritage significance of the barn as it takes the field barn element away; the new enclosure should therefore be a lightweight fence, and it is also recommended to reduce the area; there doesn’t need to be a fence next to any barn walls if it is not a usable space in between. • New driveway - this could also be reduced in size
Kind regards,
Aidan
3 Gail Dent
From: Johnston, Janice
< This e-mail was classified as: OFFICIAL >
Proposal: Full planning permission for conversion of barn to form 1 No. three bedroom local occupancy dwelling/holiday let Address: Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley Planning Reference R/66/93A Service Request Reference 20/01336/PLANYD
Memorandum in reply from: Environmental Health Services
With regard to the above application, I consider it unlikely that there will be an adverse impact from nuisance on the amenity of the area.
The applicant has not provided any information on the previous potentially contaminative uses of the barn and surrounding area for agricultural purposes. The barn is located in an area with a maximum radon potential of greater than 30%.
The applicant has stated that the barn is provided with a water supply, which it is assumed will be from a private source, given the location of the buildings. The applicant will have to have the supply risk assessed by Richmondshire District Council Environmental Health due to the proposed use as holiday accommodation.
Recommendations I recommend that the following conditions be attached to any approval: 1 No development shall be commenced until an assessment of the risks posed by contamination, carried out in line with the Environment Agency’s Land Contamination: Risk Management (LCRM), has been submitted to and approved by the local planning authority. If deemed necessary a scheme for the remediation of any contamination shall be submitted and approved by the local planning authority before any development occurs. The development shall not be occupied until the approved remediation scheme has been implemented and a verification report detailing all works carried out has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
2 If contamination is found or suspected at any time during development that was not previously identified all works shall cease and the local planning authority shall be notified in writing immediately. No further works (other than approved remediation measures) shall be undertaken or the development occupied until an investigation and risk assessment carried out in accordance with the Environment Agency’s Land Contamination: Risk Management (LCRM), has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Where remediation is necessary a scheme for the remediation of any contamination shall be submitted and approved by the LPA before any further development occurs. The development shall not be occupied until the approved remediation scheme has been implemented and a verification report detailing all works carried out has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.
Informative The Private Water Supplies (England) Regulations 2016 (as amended) categorise any private water supply used for a commercial enterprise (such as holiday accommodation, bed and 1 breakfast, food production etc.) as a Regulation 9 supply. This Regulation requires the water supply to be risk assessed and monitored on an annual basis. Failure to do so may lead to service of a Notice restricting the use of the supply.
If your property falls within this category and it has not already been assessed/monitored, you must contact Richmondshire District Council Environmental Health for further advice.
Regards
Janice Johnston 18 August 2020 Environmental Health Richmondshire District Council
Janice Johnston Environmental Health Officer Richmondshire District Council t: 01748900903 e: [email protected]
w: www.richmondshire.gov.uk
The information contained in this email is confidential. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform the sender immediately and delete it and all copies from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Richmondshire District Council.
All e-mail traffic may be subject to monitoring/recording in accordance with relevant legislation.
Richmondshire District Council, Mercury House, Station Road, Richmond, North Yorkshire, DL10 4JX.
2
NYFRS Reference: Premises: 00392584 Harrogate Fire Station Job: 1209424 Skipton Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 4LE
When telephoning please ask for: A Tipling Tel: 01423 857840 Fax: 01423 522403
Email: [email protected]
17 August 2020
Dear Sir or Madam
The Occupier, Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, Horsehouse, Leyburn, DL8 4TX
FIRE SAFETY - COMMUNICATION WITH THE PLANNING AUTHORITY
Receipt is acknowledged of your planning communication:
Dated: 29th July 2020 Plans No: R/66/93A
Your communication has been dealt with as follows:
At this stage in the planning approval process the North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner Fire and Rescue Authority have no objection/observation to the proposed development. The North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner Fire and Rescue Authority will make further comment in relation to the suitability of proposed fire safety measures at the time when the building control body submit a statutory Building Regulations consultation to the Fire Authority.
The majority of information we collect regarding business fire safety is non-personalised information, however any personal data we collect will be managed in accordance with our Privacy Notice which can be viewed on our website, www.northyorksfire.gov.uk/ about- us/yourdata.
Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Yoredale Bainbridge Leyburn North Yorkshire DL8 3EL Sprinklers Save Lives, Sprinklers Save Lives, Sprinklers Save Lives, Sprinklers Save Lives, Sprinklers Save Lives www.northyorksfire.gov.uk
Under the Regulatory Reform Order 2005 we are obliged to publish a public register of enforcement action which can be viewed via our website, www.northyorksfire.gov.uk/about- us/key-documents/links-registers.
Should you require further information please contact the officer whose name appears at the head of the letter.
Yours faithfully
A Tipling
NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL BUSINESS and ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONSIDERATIONS and RECOMMENDATION
Application No: R/66/93A full planning permission for conversion of barn to form 1 No. three Proposed Development: bedroom local occupancy dwelling/holiday let Location: Barn at Ing Laithe Braidley DL8 4TX Applicant: Mrs Barbara Johnston
CH Ref: Case Officer: Ian Beighton Area Ref: Tel: 01609 780 780
County Road No: E-mail: [email protected]
Yorkshire Dales National Park To: Date: 29 July 2020 Authority Yoredale, Bainbridge DL8 3EL FAO: Paul Martinson Copies to:
The Local Highway Authority recommends that the following Conditions are attached to any permission granted:
MHC-03 New and altered Private Access or Verge Crossing
The development must not be brought into use until the access to the site has been set out and constructed in accordance with the ‘Specification for Housing and Industrial Estate Roads and Private Street Works” published by the Local Highway Authority and the following requirements:
The crossing of the highway verge must be constructed in accordance with the approved details and Standard Detail Number E1 Var (Construction Depths Only) and the following requirements.
• Any gates or barriers must not be able to swing over the existing highway. LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONSIDERATIONS and RECOMMENDATION Continuation sheet:
Application No: R/66/93A
• The final surfacing of any private access within 2 metres of the public highway must not contain any loose material that is capable of being drawn on to the existing public highway.
• Measures should be provided to enable vehicles to enter and leave the site in a forward gear.
All works must accord with the approved details.
Reason for Condition
To ensure a satisfactory means of access to the site from the public highway in the interests of highway safety and the convenience of all highway users.
MHi-C New and altered Private Access or Verge Crossing
Notwithstanding any valid planning permission for works to amend the existing highway, you are advised that a separate licence will be required from North Yorkshire County Council as the Local Highway Authority in order to allow any works in the existing public highway to be carried out.
The Local Highway Authority will also be pleased to provide the detailed constructional specifications referred to in this condition.
MHC-05 Visibility Splays
There must be no access or egress by any vehicles between the highway and the application site until splays are provided giving clear visibility of 70 metres in an easterly direction and 90 metres in a westerly direction measured along the channel line of the major road from a point measured 2 metres down the centre line of the access.
In measuring the splays, the eye height must be 1.05 metres and the object height must be 0.6 metres.
Once created, these visibility splays must be maintained clear of any obstruction and retained for their intended purpose at all times.
Reason for Condition
In the interests of highway safety LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONSIDERATIONS and RECOMMENDATION Continuation sheet:
Application No: R/66/93A
MHi-D Visibility Splays – (MHC-05)
An explanation of the terms used above is available from the Local Highway Authority.
MHC-09B Provision of Approved Access, Turning and Parking Areas
No part of the development must be brought into use until the access, parking, manoeuvring and turning areas for all users have been constructed in accordance with the details approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and as shown on Drawing Number AFR / P 1265 / D3 Revision E.
Once created these areas must be maintained clear of any obstruction and retained for their intended purpose at all times.
Reason for Condition
To provide for appropriate on-site vehicle facilities in the interests of highway safety and the general amenity of the development.
MHC-15B Construction Phase Management Plan
No development must commence until a Construction Management Plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Construction of the permitted development must be undertaken in accordance with the approved plan.
The Plan must include, but not be limited, to arrangements for the following in respect of each phase of the works:
1. The parking of contractors’ site operatives and visitor’s vehicles clear of the highway.
2. Areas for storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development clear of the highway.
Reason for Condition
In the interest of public safety and amenity LOCAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONSIDERATIONS and RECOMMENDATION Continuation sheet:
Application No: R/66/93A
MHi-R Statutory Processes
There shall be no site clearance, demolition, excavation or depositing of material in connection with the construction of the development until details of the proposed works to underpin or otherwise amend the wall of the property immediately adjacent to the Public Highway have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Highway Authority.
This will require an application to be made to the Highway Authority for ‘Technical Approval’ of the proposed design / works.
MHi-S Doors and Windows Opening over the Highway
You are advised to ensure that any doors and windows on the elevation of the building adjacent to the existing highway are constructed and installed such that they do not open over the public highway for a height of 2.4 metres from the level of the adjacent highway.
Above 2.4 metres no part of an open door or window must come within 0.5 metres of the carriageway. Any future replacement doors and windows should also comply with these dimensions.
Note To Planner
The tree which is situated in the plot just to the west of the proposed vehicular access causes an impediment to visibility for drivers emerging onto the Highway.
It is asked that the applicant makes arrangements to remove any low lying branches so as to maximise visibility and to maintain this improved visibility in perpetuity.
Signed: Issued by: Richmond Highways Office Gatherley Road Industrial Estate Brompton On Swale North Yorkshire Ian Beighton DL10 7JQ
For Corporate Director for Business and Environmental Services e-mail: [email protected]