DOCSLIB.ORG

Lindsey Lightowler Senior Wildlife Conservation Officer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lindsey Lightowler Senior Wildlife Conservation Officer Lindsey Lightowler From: Tony Serjeant Sent: 14 September 2020 12:41 To: Paul Martinson Cc: Vanessa Jackson; Planning Subject: R/66/93A Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, DL8 4TX Paul, Thank you for re-consulting me recently on this application. My views remain the same as those expressed in my response made to you on 12 February 2020. Regards, Tony Tony Serjeant Senior Wildlife Conservation Officer Direct: 01756 751627 Switchboard: 0300 456 0030 Website Facebook Twitter Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority Colvend | Hebden Road | Grassington Skipton | North Yorkshire | BD23 5LB 1 Gail Dent From: Aidan Ball-Albessard Sent: 20 August 2020 11:44 To: Paul Martinson; Planning Cc: Gaby Rose Subject: Planning Consultation - Application R66/93A at Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, DL8 4TX Hi Paul/ Planning, Parish folder:\\yorkshiredales\ydnpadata\Planning\Parishes\Carlton Highdale R66\093\93A Photos: X:\Planning\Parishes\Carlton Highdale R66\Photo Library\Ings barn coverdale Heritage Significance c.1848 1 1892 1910 Ing Lathe was possibly built in the first half of the 19th century. It is shown on the OS maps with a different (smaller) extension to the east than exists today. The current rear extension was built after 1910 in 2 traditional solid-wall construction, so most likely in the first half of C20. There is a ‘shelf’ of protruding stones to the left part on the roadside (original) elevation; their function is unclear, and the Streetview photos do not show a blocked opening underneath. It looks like the masonry has been repointed in recent years – this may have covered up some evidence also. There is a blocked up opening on the roadside towards the centre of the elevation that could possibly have been an ‘entrance’, although it is very unlikely that the road level would have as low as the GF level of the barn. The existing opening on this elevation was a forking hole which was later inserted (jamb stones don’t relate to coursing of masonry). The north east elevation has a larger FF taking-in door which looks original (no obvious disturbance in the masonry). Internally on the south (former external) wall of the original barn there were two openings making it a Type C barn – one door would have lead to the shippon, the other to the hay mew. The current extension was built to increase the size of the shippon. Proposals • Rooflights - the current number and layout of the rooflights would have a negative visual impact on the barn. The rooflight above proposed bedroom 3 is not justified because of the light provided by the taking-in door. The rooflight above the proposed stair would be harmful in particular as it would be highly visible from the road; the staircase does not require natural daylight. The third rooflight above the extension is also not justified as the room has 3 windows; moreover, the door can also be used as a source for daylight. • Enlarge southeast [west on drawing is incorrect] windows – the plans show two windows enlarged on this elevation. This would have an unnecessary harmful impact on the heritage significance of the barn, as the agricultural openings would be changed to domestic-proportion windows. Repairs/ replacements should match the existing windows. • Partially reinstating blocked opening with a half window - this would harm the readability of the barn as the blocked opening is already ‘incomplete’, and the proposed works would fragment it more, so it would become very unreadable. If they want to make use of it, they need to unblock the whole thing and employ an opaque panel to the top (like on gable elevation, but the other way round) • Inserting new GF window to north east gable – The would have a negative impact on the heritage significance as it confuses how the barn was used. The double-storey mews would only have an intake hole on the FF. • Altering ground level to north east – this would have a negative impact because the barn built into the hillside is a key feature to how the barn functioned. The slope would have provided a practical level to fork hay, clear waste etc. • Inserting door to north east elevation of extension – this is not justified as there is already an opening to the extension. The loss of masonry and introduction of a new feature would be harmful to the significance of the barn. • Insertion of flue to rear – acceptable • Creation of new boundary walling – this has a very negative impact on the heritage significance of the barn as it takes the field barn element away; the new enclosure should therefore be a lightweight fence, and it is also recommended to reduce the area; there doesn’t need to be a fence next to any barn walls if it is not a usable space in between. • New driveway - this could also be reduced in size Kind regards, Aidan 3 Gail Dent From: Johnston, Janice <[email protected]> Sent: 18 August 2020 15:54 To: Planning Subject: Consultation response < This e-mail was classified as: OFFICIAL > Proposal: Full planning permission for conversion of barn to form 1 No. three bedroom local occupancy dwelling/holiday let Address: Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley Planning Reference R/66/93A Service Request Reference 20/01336/PLANYD Memorandum in reply from: Environmental Health Services With regard to the above application, I consider it unlikely that there will be an adverse impact from nuisance on the amenity of the area. The applicant has not provided any information on the previous potentially contaminative uses of the barn and surrounding area for agricultural purposes. The barn is located in an area with a maximum radon potential of greater than 30%. The applicant has stated that the barn is provided with a water supply, which it is assumed will be from a private source, given the location of the buildings. The applicant will have to have the supply risk assessed by Richmondshire District Council Environmental Health due to the proposed use as holiday accommodation. Recommendations I recommend that the following conditions be attached to any approval: 1 No development shall be commenced until an assessment of the risks posed by contamination, carried out in line with the Environment Agency’s Land Contamination: Risk Management (LCRM), has been submitted to and approved by the local planning authority. If deemed necessary a scheme for the remediation of any contamination shall be submitted and approved by the local planning authority before any development occurs. The development shall not be occupied until the approved remediation scheme has been implemented and a verification report detailing all works carried out has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. 2 If contamination is found or suspected at any time during development that was not previously identified all works shall cease and the local planning authority shall be notified in writing immediately. No further works (other than approved remediation measures) shall be undertaken or the development occupied until an investigation and risk assessment carried out in accordance with the Environment Agency’s Land Contamination: Risk Management (LCRM), has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Where remediation is necessary a scheme for the remediation of any contamination shall be submitted and approved by the LPA before any further development occurs. The development shall not be occupied until the approved remediation scheme has been implemented and a verification report detailing all works carried out has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Informative The Private Water Supplies (England) Regulations 2016 (as amended) categorise any private water supply used for a commercial enterprise (such as holiday accommodation, bed and 1 breakfast, food production etc.) as a Regulation 9 supply. This Regulation requires the water supply to be risk assessed and monitored on an annual basis. Failure to do so may lead to service of a Notice restricting the use of the supply. If your property falls within this category and it has not already been assessed/monitored, you must contact Richmondshire District Council Environmental Health for further advice. Regards Janice Johnston 18 August 2020 Environmental Health Richmondshire District Council Janice Johnston Environmental Health Officer Richmondshire District Council t: 01748900903 e: [email protected] w: www.richmondshire.gov.uk The information contained in this email is confidential. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please inform the sender immediately and delete it and all copies from your system. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Richmondshire District Council. All e-mail traffic may be subject to monitoring/recording in accordance with relevant legislation. Richmondshire District Council, Mercury House, Station Road, Richmond, North Yorkshire, DL10 4JX. 2 NYFRS Reference: Premises: 00392584 Harrogate Fire Station Job: 1209424 Skipton Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 4LE When telephoning please ask for: A Tipling Tel: 01423 857840 Fax: 01423 522403 Email: [email protected] 17 August 2020 Dear Sir or Madam The Occupier, Barn at Ing Laithe, Braidley, Horsehouse, Leyburn, DL8 4TX FIRE SAFETY - COMMUNICATION WITH THE PLANNING AUTHORITY Receipt is acknowledged of your planning communication: Dated: 29th July 2020 Plans No: R/66/93A Your communication has been dealt with as follows: At this stage in the planning approval process the North Yorkshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner Fire and Rescue Authority have no objection/observation to the proposed development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inaugural Junior Doctor Awards Launched by Trust
    February 2019 StaffMatters Inaugural Junior Doctor Awards launched by Trust e know that our “There are four categories in junior doctors work which doctors can be nominated Mike Proctor, Chief Wincredibly hard, in - including rising star and often under very testing team player. The fifth category Executive, said: circumstances, and contribute is to recognise the efforts of an ❝ Junior doctors greatly to the safe and high- educational or clinical supervisor are some of the quality care that the Trust who consistently goes the extra provides for its patients. mile in pursuit of supporting unsung heroes of In recognition of this, the junior doctors to succeed.” healthcare, often first ever Trust Junior Doctor Anyone can submit a Awards have been launched. nomination by completing the balancing the bulk Lisa Smith, Guardian of Safer online nomination form, available of a hospital’s day Working and Chair of Junior nature of junior doctors’ training, on Staff Room/Recognition and to day legwork Doctor Forum, explained: “The they are often overlooked in Awards. Nomination close at Junior Doctor Forum (JDF) has organisational efforts to appreciate midnight 15 March 2019. alongside their been working hard behind staff and that a culture promoting Lisa added: “On behalf of the ongoing training. the scenes to improve the regular, positive feedback and JDF, we hope staff will take the These awards aim working lives and experience learning from excellence currently time to show their appreciation of being a junior doctor in this exists only in small pockets. for the hard work junior doctors to highlight some Trust - and one of the actions These factors can leave junior put in during their stay in the of the great work is to reward excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Council of Governors (Meeting Held in Public)
    Agenda Council of Governors (Meeting held in Public) 11 March 2020 Malton Rugby Club at 1.30pm 1 Good Meeting Etiquette KEY POINTS Good meeting behaviour contributes to good meeting outcomes. Effective meetings need forethought and preparation. Listening, respecting your colleagues’ right to express their views and making your points constructively are the cornerstones of good meeting etiquette. The checklist below includes activities you could go through at the start of your meeting. They give you a clear summary of what everyone should expect to be able to do, and how they can expect to be treated. ASK YOURSELF, HAVE I... read and understood the minutes and papers? checked the agenda? made notes on what I want to say? got written responses to anything I’ve been asked to address? arranged to be there for the whole meeting? TELL YOURSELF, I WILL... actively participate ensuring I stick to the point, but do not dominate the meeting. really listen to what people say. compliment the work of at least one colleague. try to make at least one well prepared contribution but not repeat what someone else has said. remember it is about representing members and not bring personal experiences to the meeting. ENVIRONMENT can I hear/see everything that is going on? is my phone switched off? Our vision is to be collaborative leaders in a system that provides great care to our communities. 2 COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS MEETING The programme for the next meeting of the Council of Governors will take place: On: 11 March 2020 In: Malton Rugby Club,
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Banks Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I
    Karen Banks From: Grace Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 10:01 To: Andrew Bishop; Planning; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning Application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom Farm, West Burton, North Yorkshire, DL8 4UL I object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton on visual impact grounds. Grace Maddan 1 Karen Banks From: Humphrey Maddan <[email protected]> Sent: 05 February 2021 08:47 To: Planning; Andrew Bishop; [email protected]; localplan Subject: Planning application R/85/514/GDO Adambottom farm West Burton Leyburn DL8 4UL Dear Planners, I strongly object to the proposed mast at West Scrafton. I think there are many reasons why it is unwise to accept 5G modernisation at the cost of the world class Yorkshire Dales. Here are a few: 1) Economically - the business cases I've viewed about the benefits to do with IoT does simply not stack up in having a meaningful benefit to our communities. Faster internet yes - see next point: 2) Technically - fibre optic would be hugely preferable as a solution to faster internet - due to speed and precision with no visual collateral. 3) Aesthetically - I would hope that individuals responsible for stewarding the Yorkshire Dales are conscious of how rare a landscape they are able to either preserve or change. 4)Environmentally - I think the effect on pollinators and species (not to mention humans) seems to be relatively unquantified. Therefore in light of the other areas, there is no reason to bring this risk to our community. I realise that it must be a hard decision - but please scrutinise your motives in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Moubray of Killerby CHARGES This Is the Time of Unexampled Grain, It Pi Ay Ho Wo 1 Th While to an Interesting Sidelight on T:Ho Inn
    2<itll, IdaQ Wednesday, April 26th. MoO. (GNALL. RICHMOND BOY ON Death Mrs M M with start. Plough up the Bad Grass °f - - Memories of Durham NEW FortiphonoNo.19! Irsdav son SHOPBREAKING "t ° 1 - Moubray of Killerby CHARGES This is the time of unexampled grain, it Pi ay ho wo 1 th while to An interesting sidelight on t:ho Inn. a fact which pleasantly sur­ DEAF progress in faniuing. Our land is have a count of the number of wire- Durham of 150 years ago has been prised them since their experience of more fertile than it lias ever been worms that the soil contains. This, 1 A 12-year-old Richmond boy east by discoveries made in the taverns elsewhere, especially in hear more, more clearly The death of Mrs May Marianne Yorks and Lanes, had not been a —our crops yield more abundantly, indeed, is less important than it already on probation for two years Yorkshire village of Tadcaster a our cows give more milk, our herds used to be, since seed corn may now Moubray, of Killerby, near Catter- for a larceny offence in February, happy one. Previously mast of and at greater distance I quarter of a century ago, and now ard Hocks are 'healthier than at be dressed with a material that ick Village, took place. Born in pleaded guilty at the Juvenile Court these inns had been described as receiving expert consideration' for This new All-in-one Fortiphonc No. 19 brings still any time in Jiistdry. ^loreover, gives the crop a large measure of 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu Ard O Ublic of D C Mee Irec Eting Tors G
    Board of Directors (Public Meeting) Wednesday 29 November 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING The programme for the next meeting of the Board of Directors will take place: On: Wednesday 29 November 2017 In: The Boardroom, Foundation Trust Headquarters, 2nd Floor Administration Block, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York, YO31 8HE TIME MEETING LOCATION ATTENDEES 8.00am – NED Monthly Boardroom, York Hospital NEDs 9.30am Meeting 9.30am – Financial Recovery Boardroom, York Hospital Board of Directors 10.30am Board Meeting 10.30am – Board of Directors Boardroom, York Hospital Board of Directors 11.30am meeting held in private 11.45am – Board of Directors Boardroom, York Board of Directors 1.15pm meeting held in Hospital Members of the public Public 2.00pm – Lord Carter Session Boardroom, York Hospital Board of Directors 4.00pm To be a valued and trusted partner within our care system delivering safe effective care to the population we serve. Board of Directors (Public) Agenda SUBJECT LEAD PAPER PAGE TIME 1. Apologies for absence and quorum Chair Verbal - 11.45 – To receive any apologies for absence 11.55 Mr J Taylor 2. Declaration of Interests Chair A 09 To receive any changes to the register of Directors’ declarations of interest, pursuant to section 6 of Standing Orders. 3. Minutes of the meeting held on 27 Chair B 15 September 2017 To receive and approve the minutes from the meeting held on 27 September 2017 4. Matters arising from the minutes and Chair Verbal - any outstanding actions To discuss any matters or actions arising from the minutes 5. Patient Story Chief Verbal - 11.55 Executive – To receive the details of a patient letter 12.05 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond (Yorks) Area Constituency Committee
    Please note date and time of meeting Agenda Meeting: Richmond (Yorks) Area Constituency Committee Venue: Remote live broadcast meeting via Microsoft Teams Date: 8th January 2021 at 2pm Pursuant to The Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020, this meeting will be held using video conferencing with a live broadcast to the Council’s YouTube site. Further information on this is available on the committee pages on the Council website - https://democracy.northyorks.gov.uk/ The meeting will be available to view once the meeting commences, via the following link - www.northyorks.gov.uk/livemeetings Recordings of previous live broadcast meetings are also available there. 1. Chairman’s welcome and introductions – including apologies for absence 2. Minutes of the meeting held on 25th November 2020 (Pages 4 to 15) 3. Any Declarations of Interest 4. Public Questions or Statements Members of the public may ask questions or make statements at this meeting if they have given notice and provided the text to Daniel Harry of Democratic Services (contact details below) no later than midday on Tuesday 5 January 2021. Each speaker should limit themselves to 3 minutes on any item. Members of the public who have given notice will be invited to speak:- Enquiries relating to this agenda please contact Daniel Harry Tel: 01609 533531 or e-mail [email protected] Website: www.northyorks.gov.uk OFFICIAL at this point in the meeting if their questions/statements relate to matters which are not otherwise on the Agenda (subject to an overall time limit of 30 minutes); when the relevant Agenda item is being considered if they wish to speak on a matter which is on the Agenda for this meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta-Scts 2012
    JOINT ANNUAL MEETING ACTA -SCTS 2012 at The Manchester Central Conference Centre Wednesday 18th - Friday 20th April 2012 Association for Society for Cardiothoracic Cardiothoracic Surgery Anaesthetists in Great Britain and Ireland www.acta.org.uk www.scts.org ACTA & SCTS JOINT ANNUAL MEETING 2012 The Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists and The Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland 2012 ANNUAL MEETING & CARDIOTHORACIC FORUM 18-20 April 2012 Manchester Central Conference Centre Dr Donna Greenhalgh (2011-2012), Chairman, ACTA Professor David Taggart (2010-2012), President, SCTS Contents International Guests 3 National Guests 4 Manchester Central Hall Plan 5 Outline Programme 6 Meeting Programme 10 Abstracts 61 The Patrick Magee Medal Competition 275 Authors’ Index 279 Exhibitors List 287 Exhibition Floor Plan 288 Exhibition Catalogue 289 General Information 317 Committees 321 Meeting History 330 1 ACTA-SCTS JOINT MEETING • Manchester Central Conference Centre Association of Cardiothoracic Society for Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The Royal College of Surgeons of England Churchill House, 35 Red Lion Square, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields London WC1R 4SG London WC2A 3PE Tel: +44 (0) 020 7092 1726 Tel: +44 (0) 20 7869 6893 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7092 1730 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7869 6890 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.acta.org.uk www.scts.org All best endeavours will be made to present the programme as printed. However the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetists and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland reserve the right to alter or cancel without prior notice any of the arrangements, timetables, plans or other items relating directly or indirectly to the meeting for any cause beyond their reasonable control.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming the Way We Care for Older People
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust THANK YOU AWARDS Celebrating our remarkable people Page 3 TRANSFORMING THE Way WE CARE FOR OLDER PEOPLE Spring 2016 A magazine for staff Welcome Innovative partnership I hope you managed to have some well- earned rest over the Christmas and New Year period as 2015 was certainly an exceptionally busy year right across the BEGIns to transForM Trust. Despite this, on top of providing good quality care you also helped deliver some impressive changes to the way we work. Some of the amazing OLDER PEopLE’S carE achievements were showcased at the Trust Thank You Awards and you can read more about that in this edition of the LINK. IN SHEFFIELD We are currently awaiting the results of our successful partnership between that patients have a better chance of retaining Care Quality Commission inspection which health services and social care independent living if they are discharged home involved a huge effort from everyone across is enabling older patients to as soon as they no longer need hospital care. the organisation. As soon as we have the A be discharged home from hospital in outcome I will be letting you all know. “We are fortunate in Sheffield to have a more timely way and with real time hospital and community services within one We have taken a huge step on our journey support to enable them to continue Trust and to have excellent relationships with to transform the way we deliver care and living independently at home. Sheffield City Council’s social care services, operate by investing in new technology to The innovative model means that elderly GPs and commissioners which has enabled support what we do on a daily basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbour Response Summary
    Neighbour Response Summary Planning Application Ref: R/85/51A/GDO Location: Land to the south east of existing agricultural buildings off High Lane,West Scrafton,Leyburn Proposed Development: Application for prior approval under Part 16 of Schedule 2 to the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended by the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) (Amendment) (no.2) Order 2016 and in accordance with the electronic communications code under the Telecommunications Act 1984 Schedule 2 as amended by the Communications Act 2003 for the installation of a 17m wooden utility Pole (15m above ground level) with mobile communications antenna and equipment cabinet Case Officer: Andrew Bishop Valid Date: 08-Dec-2020 Application Type: GDO - Prior Approval Telecommunications Neighbour Responses Harriet Corner 1,Coverham Abbey,Coverham Abbey,Middleham,Leyburn,North Yorkshire,DL8 4RL Having spoken to next door neighbours to this application at Moorhen Farm,they tell me that there is excellent broadband and 4g service ALREADY in this particular part of the Dale,so why is this trial of any benefit to residents of Coverdale? Harriet Corner 1,Coverham Abbey,Coverham Abbey,Middleham,Leyburn,North Yorkshire,DL8 4RL I am writing,having already commented several times on your planning portal for this application (which I gather has crashed) to express my strong objection to this mast. Firstly,how can the YDNP,who are meant to be protectors of this unbelievably precious Dale,think that it is alright for this trial to take place,with its masts and ancillary infrastructure. The ecology and birdlife in the SSSi next door to this site includes a nesting site for a hen harrier,amongst many other rare species and the damage that EMF exposure would do to this could be catastrophic and irreversible.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Yorkshire Quaker History
    Researching Yorkshire Quaker history A guide to sources Compiled by Helen E Roberts for the Yorkshire Quaker Heritage Project Published by The University of Hull Brynmor Jones Library 2003 (updated 2007) 1 The University of Hull 2003 Published by The University of Hull Brynmor Jones Library ISBN 0-9544497-0-3 Acknowledgements During the lifetime of this project, numerous people have contributed their time, enthusiasm and knowledge of Quaker history; I would like to thank those who volunteered to undertake name indexing of Quaker records, those who participated in the project conferences and those who offered information to the project survey. In particular I am grateful for the continued support and encouragement of Brian Dyson, Hull University Archivist, and Oliver Pickering, Deputy Head of Special Collections, Leeds University Library, as well as the other members of the project steering group. Thanks are due to the staff of the following archive offices and libraries whose collections are covered in this guide: Cumbria Record Office, Kendal, Doncaster Archives Department, Durham County Record Office, East Riding Archives and Records Service, Huddersfield University Library, Lancashire Record Office, Leeds University Library Department of Special Collections, the Library of the Religious Society of Friends, Sheffield Archives, West Yorkshire Archive Service, York City Archives and the Borthwick Institute of Historical Research, University of York, and to the archivists at Bootham School and The Mount School, York, and Ackworth School. The support of the Friends Historical Society, the Quaker Family History Society and the Quaker Studies Research Association is also acknowledged. The project received valuable assistance from the Historical Manuscripts Commission, through the good offices of Andrew Rowley.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Wensleydale Notes
    UPPER WENSLEYDALE NOTES April 2020 Sue Harpley Because of the Covid-19 restrictions it was decided not to distribute the April issue of the Newsletter and it is unclear when we will be able to go into print again. There were a number of articles that could not be deferred to a later issue so we have included them in this document. It is not a formal issue of the Newsletter and contains no adverts. We hope you find the contents useful and entertaining. Note to Postal subscribers :- the renewal date for your postal subscription in 2021 will take account of how many issues have been missed during 2020. We hope that all our readers stay safe and healthy. Covering Upper Wensleydale from Wensley to Garsdale Head plus Walden and Bishopdale, Covering UpperSwaledale Wensleydale from from Keld Wensley to Gunnerside to Garsdale plus Cowgill Head, within Upper Walden Dentdale. and Bishopdale, Swaledale from Keld to Gunnerside plus Cowgill in Upper Dentdale. Guest Editorial riverside. Wensleydale & Trees In about 1850 a Wensleydale man noted that when he was a small boy in 1800 it was known I love trees, even the Ash tree which in various that a squirrel could get on a tree in Leyburn and places in the country is called ‘Widow’s Ash’. If was able to stay up high on the trees and only workers are in a field and it is lightning, they go get down to the ground when he arrived at and stand underneath a tree. Without any Hawes. But later on such was the number of warning or noise the Ash drops a huge bough trees being felled in the 19th Century, the often killing those below.
    [Show full text]