Olympic Park Is Where Names Will Be Made, Records Broken, New Legends Created: It Is Going to Be Centre Stage During the Summer of 2012 – and Long After
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
London 2012- Schedule by Sport
LONDON- 2012 Schedule by sport Opening Ceremony Closing Ceremony Venue: Olympic Park – Olympic Stadium Venue: Olympic Park – Olympic Stadium Dates: Friday 27 July Dates: Sunday 12 August Archery Gymnastics – Trampoline Venue: Lord’s Cricket Ground Venue: North Greenwich Arena Dates: Friday 27 July – Friday 3 August Dates: Friday 3 – Saturday 4 August Athletics Handball Venue: Olympic Park – Olympic Stadium Venue: Olympic Park – Handball Arena; Olympic Park – Dates: Friday 3 – Saturday 11 August Basketball Arena Dates: Saturday 28 July – Sunday 12 August Athletics – Marathon Hockey Venue: London Venue: Olympic Park – Hockey Centre Date: Sunday 5 and Sunday 12 August Dates: Sunday 29 July – Saturday 11 August Athletics - Race Walk Judo Venue: London Venue: ExCel Dates: Saturday 4 and Saturday 11 August Dates: Saturday 28 July – Friday 3 August Badminton Modern Pentathlon Venue: Wembley Arena Venue: Olympic Park and Greenwich Park Dates: Saturday 28 July – Sunday 5 August Dates: Saturday 11 – Sunday 12 August Basketball Rowing Venue: Olympic Park – Basketball Arena and North Venue: Eton Dorney Greenwich Arena Dates: Saturday 28 July – Saturday 4 August Dates: Saturday 28 July – Sunday 12 August Beach Volleyball Sailing Venue: Horse Guards Parade Venue: Weymouth and Portland Dates: Saturday 28 July – Thursday 9 August Dates: Sunday 29 July – Saturday 11 August Boxing Shooting Venue: ExCeL Venue: The Royal Artillery Barracks Dates: Saturday 28 July – Sunday 12 August Dates: Saturday 28 July – Sunday 5 August Canoe Slalom Swimming Venue: Lee -
Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic
5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio Page 47 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 48 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 49 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Summary of Transport Aspect of Olympic Cities Main Olympic Area 89 ㎢ 128 ㎢ 159 ㎢ 155 ㎢ 511 ㎢ Population 4.6 Million 3 Million 7.5 Million 8.2 Million 6.3 Million Main Transit for Rail/Metro Metro/Tram Rail/Metro Metro - 4 BRT Olympic Transport Bus Bus Bus improvement- Metro –line4- Bus Rail-new vehicle Dedicated Lane Some 3 Routes 34 Routes 240km More than 150km Buses 285.7km ITS -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and systems systems systems systems systems -R$65million -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Management Management Management Management Stadium Management Progress? Page 50 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Issues and Key -Size of Olympic Area Rio 2016 has Largest and Widest Main Olympic Area ⇒Minimizing Travel Time with Traffic/Transportation/Transit Mgmt -Core of Venues It will generate traffic of Spectators and Athletes Participants ⇒How to assure the linkage of each Venue and Accommodation -Main Transit Main Transit for Spectators is BRTs connecting with Metro and Rail in Other Cities; Metro or Tram or Rail ⇒ Secure Smooth Traffic On the Road ⇒ Ensure Connection of Different Mode ⇒ Traffic/Transport/Transit Operators Cooperation is most important Page 51 5. -
London 2012 Venues Guide
Olympic Delivery Authority London 2012 venues factfi le July 2012 Venuesguide Contents Introduction 05 Permanent non-competition Horse Guards Parade 58 Setting new standards 84 facilities 32 Hyde Park 59 Accessibility 86 Olympic Park venues 06 Art in the Park 34 Lord’s Cricket Ground 60 Diversity 87 Olympic Park 08 Connections 36 The Mall 61 Businesses 88 Olympic Park by numbers 10 Energy Centre 38 North Greenwich Arena 62 Funding 90 Olympic Park map 12 Legacy 92 International Broadcast The Royal Artillery Aquatics Centre 14 Centre/Main Press Centre Barracks 63 Sustainability 94 (IBC/MPC) Complex 40 Basketball Arena 16 Wembley Arena 64 Workforce 96 BMX Track 18 Olympic and Wembley Stadium 65 Venue contractors 98 Copper Box 20 Paralympic Village 42 Wimbledon 66 Eton Manor 22 Parklands 44 Media contacts 103 Olympic Stadium 24 Primary Substation 46 Out of London venues 68 Riverbank Arena 26 Pumping Station 47 Map of out of Velodrome 28 Transport 48 London venues 70 Water Polo Arena 30 Box Hill 72 London venues 50 Brands Hatch 73 Map of London venues 52 Eton Dorney 74 Earls Court 54 Regional Football stadia 76 ExCeL 55 Hadleigh Farm 78 Greenwich Park 56 Lee Valley White Hampton Court Palace 57 Water Centre 80 Weymouth and Portland 82 2 3 Introduction Everyone seems to have their Londoners or fi rst-time favourite bit of London – visitors – to the Olympic whether that is a place they Park, the centrepiece of a know well or a centuries-old transformed corner of our building they have only ever capital. Built on sporting seen on television. -
The Olympic Movement
OLYMPIC LEGACY 2013 “Creating sustainable legacies 1WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 5 is a fundamental commitment SPORTING LEGACY 13 2 of the Olympic Movement. 1 3SOCIAL LEGACIES 23 Every city that hosts the 4ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACIES 33 Olympic Games becomes a temporary steward of the 5URBAN LEGACIES 45 Olympic Movement. It is a great 6ECONOMIC LEGACIES 55 responsibility. It is also a great 7CONCLUSION 65 opportunity. Host cities capture worldwide attention. Each has a once-in-a-lifetime chance to showcase the celebration of the human spirit. And each creates a unique set of environmental, social and economic legacies that can change a community, a region, and a nation forever.” Jacques Rogge, IOC President International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne / Switzerland Tel. +41 21 621 61 11 – Fax +41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – March 2013 All rights reserved Printing by Didwedo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland 2 3 4 WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 1 A LASTING LEGACY The Olympic Games have the power to deliver lasting benefits which 6 can considerably change a community, its image and its infrastructure. 7 As one of the world’s largest sporting events, the Games can be a tremendous catalyst for change in a host city with the potential to create far more than just good memories once the final medals have been awarded. Each edition of the Olympic Games also provides significant legacies for the Olympic Movement as a whole, helping to spread the Olympic values around the world. -
Lillehammer Olympic Park
LILLEHAMMER OLYMPIC PARK Olympic City: Lillehammer Country: Norway Edition of the Games: 1994 Winter Olympic Games Preliminary remarks As you may have seen, two governance cases are dedicated to Lillehammer. Reasons that support this choice are twofold. First, Lillehammer hosted two editions of the Games. If the latter built upon the former to deliver great Games, it also produced its own legacy and consequently, structures to deal with it. Second, as legacy is about both venues and facilities at one side and education, knowledge transfer and experience sharing at the other side, two different cases were necessary to encompass various ways Lillehammer manages its Olympic legacy(ies). Inherited from the 1994 Games, the Lillehammer Olympic Park is a structure run by the municipality of Lillehammer that takes care of the majority of Olympic venues and events. The Lillehammer Olympic Legacy Sports Centre is an emanation of the Norwegian Sports Federation and Olympic and Paralympic Committee and is a direct legacy of the YOG. Obviously, many bridges and crossovers exist between these structures and collaboration and common understanding are key. The big picture also encloses the Norwegian Top Sports Centre of the Innland region dedicated to elite athletes (Olympiatoppen Innlandet), the University, the Olympic Legacy Studies Centre as well as the remaining Olympic venues run by other municipalities or private companies. With all these partners involved in managing Lillehammer’s Olympic legacy, clusters (venues, events, training, research, etc.) facilitate organisation and legacy management. Toolkit: Keeping the Flame Alive – Lillehammer Olympic Park 1 World Union of Olympic Cities 2019 HOW LEGACY GOVERNANCE STARTED IN LILLEHAMMER Since 1990 Lillehammer & Oppland https://www.olympiaparken.no/en/ • • • WHEN WHERE WEB ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… “The XVII Winter Olympics did not exist. -
The Beijing National Stadium
THE BEIJING NATIONAL STADIUM THERE ARE MANY REASONS TO REMEMBER THE 2008 Area: 254,600 square meters OLYMPIC GAMES, AND ONE OF THESE IS UNDOUBTEDLY THE Track Provider: Mondo Spa IMPRESSIVE EVENTS BROADCASTED TO AUDIENCES Height: 69,2 meters AROUND THE WORLD FROM THE OLYMPIC STADIUM IN Start date of construction: December 24, 2003 BEIJING, A BUILDING UNIVERSALLY DUBBED WITH THE Cost of project: $423 million NICKNAME "THE BIRD'S NEST". Structural engineering: Arup Number of workers: 17,000 Steel used: 44,000 tons Capacity: 80,000/91,000 (2008 Olympic games) Olympic Editions (China) AN ARCHITECTURAL MIRACLE The reason for the name immediately strikes the eye : an intricate system of ties and a complex steel structure makes the building look like a huge nest, that can hold up to 91,000 spectators and has one of the world's fastest athletic tracks. The history of this architectural miracle began with an annoucement issued on December 19, 2002. On March 26, 2003 a team of international experts examined the proposals coming from all over the world. In April, the winner was announced: the swiss Herzog & De Meuron firm, which along with Arup Sport and the China Architecture Design & Research Group would deliver the full project in December 2007. Everything was perfect, up to the last details. On June 28, 2008 a grand opening ceremony drew the curtain on this colossal stage that would for about a month put the Chinese dragon under the worlds’ astonished eyes. THE MYTH Creating a building of this magnitude was not an easy task. In China everything is a symbol and a reference to the past and the National Stadium in Beijing was no different. -
Summer Olympic Games Offical Report London 2012
The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited London 2012 London 2012 Olympic Games Official Report Volume 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SECTION 1: BUILDING A WORLD-CLASS ORGANISATION 13 Introduction 14 Governance, structure and legal support 15 Finance 16 Building the team 18 Workforce Planning and Operations 19 Games Maker volunteers 20 Diversity and inclusion 23 Embedding sustainability 25 Commercial 28 − Procurement 28 − Commercial negotiations and the domestic partner programme 29 − Licensing and retail 30 − Ticketing 31 Brand management and protection 34 SECTION 2: STAGING A GREAT GAMES 35 Introduction 36 Venues 40 − Venue Planning 41 − Venue Development 42 Sport 44 − Sport Competition 44 − Sport Presentation 46 − NOC Services 47 Anti-Doping 48 Medical Services 49 Villages 50 Look 53 Motto 54 Spectator experience 56 Event Services 57 Technology 58 Broadcast 61 Press Operations 62 Games Services 65 − Arrivals and Departures 65 − Accommodation 65 − Logistics 66 − Catering, Cleaning and Waste 67 Health and Safety 68 International Relations 69 Readiness 70 Test events 71 The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited 2 SECTION 3: EVERYONE’s GamES 74 Introduction 75 Communications 78 − Public Relations and Media 80 − Government Relations 81 − Community Relations 82 − Editorial Services 83 − Web and New Media 84 Brand and Marketing 86 − Games emblems 86 − Research and relationships 87 − Mascots 88 Nations and Regions 89 Inspire 90 Education 91 Ceremonies 93 Olympic -
SELECT COMMITTEE on OLYMPIC and PARALYMPIC LEGACY Oral and Written Evidence
SELECT COMMITTEE ON OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC LEGACY Oral and written evidence Contents Active in Time Ltd—Written evidence ................................................................................................. 3 Association for Physical Education (afPE)—Written evidence ......................................................... 8 Big Lottery Fund—Written evidence .................................................................................................. 16 BioRegional—Written evidence ........................................................................................................... 21 Boff, Andrew—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 24 Boggis, Emma—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 35 British Gliding Association (BGA)—Written evidence ................................................................... 49 British Standards Institution (BSI)—Written evidence .................................................................... 51 British Swimming and the Amateur Swimming Association—Written evidence ...................... 55 British Paralympic Association (BPA)—Written evidence ............................................................. 64 Community Safety Social Inclusion Scrutiny Commission—Written evidence ......................... 70 Dorset County Council—Written evidence .................................................................................... -
The Sustainability Gap: a Case Study of Olympic Development
THE SUSTAINABILITY GAP: A CASE STUDY OF OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENT IN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA AND BEIJING, CHINA by ANDREA BLASER A THESIS Presented to the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master of Science September 2008 11 "The Sustainability Gap: A Case Study of Olympic Development in Sydney, Australia and Beijing, China," a thesis prepared by Andrea Blaser in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the Master ofScience degree in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: Mark Gillem, Chair ofthe Examining Committee Date Committee in Charge: Mark Gillem, Chair Deborah Hurtt Liz Carter Accepted by: Dean ofthe Graduate School 111 © 2008 Andrea Blaser iv An Abstract ofthe Thesis of Andrea Blaser for the degree of Master of Science in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation to be taken September 2008 Title: THE SUSTAINABILITY GAP: A CASE STUDY OF OLYMPIC DEVELOPMENT IN SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA AND BEIJING, CHINA Approved: _ Mark Gillem A media uproar occurred in 2006 after a wrecking ball flattened an Imperial-era hutong neighborhood in Beijing. While this kind ofnews story would often be ignored as just another example ofthe Chinese government destroying cultural history in the name ofprogress, the story of Qianmen had a new twist. Not only was Qianmen a protected heritage area under a 2002 Beijing Municipal Government Conservation Plan, but the destruction was said to have happened because ofthe upcoming 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Was the development ofQianmen in step with Olympic ideals and sustainable development? This thesis explores the sustainable development agenda ofthe International Olympic Committee, Agenda 21, in order to analyze the agenda, its impact in driving development policies in host cities Sydney, Australia and Beijing, China, and to what v extent planners incorporated historic preservation into Olympic development policies in both cities. -
A Performance Audit of the Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation
REPORT TO THE UTAH LEGISLATURE Number 2017-08 A Performance Audit of the Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation October 2017 Office of the LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR GENERAL State of Utah STATE OF UTAH Office of the Legislative Auditor General 315 HOUSE BUILDING • PO BOX 145315 • SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5315 (801) 538-1033 • FAX (801) 538-1063 Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee President Wayne L. Niederhauser, Co–Chair • Speaker Gregory H. Hughes, Co–Chair JOHN M. SCHAFF, CIA Senator Gene Davis • Senator Ralph Okerlund • Representative Brian S. King • Representative Brad R. Wilson AUDITOR GENERAL October 17, 2017 TO: THE UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE Transmitted herewith is our report, A Performance Audit of the Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation (Report #2017-08). A digest is found on the blue pages located at the front of the report. The objectives and scope of the audit are explained in the Introduction. We will be happy to meet with appropriate legislative committees, individual legislators, and other state officials to discuss any item contained in the report in order to facilitate the implementation of the recommendations. Sincerely, John M. Schaff, CIA Auditor General JMS/lm Digest of A Performance Audit of the Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation In 1994, the Utah Legislature supported the creation of the nonprofit, Utah Athletic Foundation. That nonprofit currently operates under the name Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation (UOLF or foundation). The Legislature’s purpose in supporting the creation of the foundation was to foster an Olympic legacy and promote winter sports development in the state. After the 2002 Winter Olympic Games, the foundation assumed responsibility for operating and maintaining the Utah Olympic Park assets. -
Sydney Olympic Park
THESIS PROJECT SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK OLYMPIC LEGACY OR BURDEN BY BEN JAMES 2007 AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUBMITTED AS A PARTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE BACHELOR OF PLANNING DEGREE, UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES 2007 ABSTRACT ‘The best Olympic Games ever’ are the words that Olympic organising committees around the world want to hear after they have hosted the Olympic Games. This title can only be held by one host city, and the current holder is Sydney. However, like many host cities in the past, infrastructure built for the Games has not had much of a post-games life. Due to this lack of post-games use, the main Olympic site at Homebush is perceived as a burden on Sydney rather than the unambiguous positive legacy envisaged. Sydney Olympic Park has even been described as a ‘white elephant’. This thesis will look at how the site as a whole has functioned since the Games, with particular reference to underutilisation of the two main stadiums. The potential of the 2002 master plan to inject new uses and vitality into the site is considered. The thesis provides a series of best practice guidelines that could be used by future hosts of similar mega-events to ensure that Games-related infrastructure does not become a burden on the host city. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to thank Peter Williams, who as my thesis advisor provided me with the guidance and assistance that was required for me to complete my thesis. I secondly would like to thank Ellie for her assistance in the reading and formatting of my thesis, as well as her continued support throughout the thesis project. -
Planning for a Sustainable Future
SPORT ADVISORY SERVICES Planning for a Sustainable Future The legacy of sporting venues following major events kpmg.com Cover photo: Péter Szalmás Planning for a Sustainable Future 3 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Appraising recent events ...................................................................................................................8 3. The growing importance of legacy for the International Olympic Committee ���������������������������������11 4. Formulating the most appropriate venue legacy plan – factors and challenges at play ..................12 5. Creative solutions at London 2012 .................................................................................................16 6. The International Swimming Federation (FINA) is taking the initiative �������������������������������������������� 17 7. The case for temporary venues – technical and financial considerations ....................................... 18 8. Emerging themes and conclusion ...................................................................................................22 © 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties,