DOCSLIB.ORG

How the Kent Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy Has Been Developed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How the Kent Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy Has Been Developed How the Kent Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy has been developed Annex 2 Prepared by Kent Waste Partnership January 2007 KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 HOW THE SRATEGY WAS DEVELOPED 4 2.1 WHO WAS INVOLVED IN DEVELOPING THE STRATEGY? 4 2.2 STAGES IN STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT 4 3 OFFICER ENGAGEMENT 5 3.1 OFFICER WORKSHOPS 5 3.2 WHO WAS INVOLVED? 5 3.3 MEETING DETAILS 5 4 MEMBER ENGAGEMENT 6 4.1 KENT WASTE FORUM MEETINGS 6 4.1.1 WHO WAS INVOLVED? 6 4.1.2 MEETING DETAILS 6-7 4.2 MEMBER BRIEFINGS 7 4.2.1 MEETING DETAILS 7 5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 8 5.1 KENT WASTE OPEN FORUM MEETINGS 8 5.2 WHO WAS INVOLVED? 8 5.3 MEETING DETAILS 8-11 6 WIDER COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 12 6.1 COMMUNITY DISCUSSION GUIDE 12 6.2 COMMUNITY GROUP MEETINGS 12 6.2.1 MEETING DETAILS 12 7 STRATEGY PUBLICITY 13 7.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENTS 13 7.2 CONSULTATION ARTICLES 14 7.3 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL WEBSITE 14 7.4 MEDIA COVERAGE 14 7.5 RESPONSE METHODS 15 8 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL 16 KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 2 1. INTRODUCTION This annex summarises the way in which the Kent Waste Local Authorities have prepared their Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy (the Strategy). It contains information on: • Who was Involved in Developing the Strategy; • Officer Engagement; • Member Engagement; • Community Sector Engagement; • Wider Community Engagement; • Strategy Publicity; • Sustainability Appraisal. KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 3 2. HOW WAS THE STRATEGY DEVELOPED? 2.1 WHO WAS INVOLVED IN DEVELOPING THE STRATEGY? Kent’s Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy (JMWMS) has been developed through the Kent Waste Forum (KWF) over a number of phases from September 2005 through to November 2006. The Kent Waste Forum comprises of elected members from each of the twelve District and Borough Councils in Kent, the County Council, the Association of Parish Councils, the Environment Agency and ReMaDe Kent and Medway. Representatives from Medway Unitary Authority also attend, and input into Strategy development. The KWF meets roughly three times a year to discuss current and future issues. Support in developing the Strategy was provided by Environmental Resources Management Ltd (ERM) funded by Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The JMWMS strategy has been developed in parallel to the Waste Development Framework (WDF), which focuses on the planning and site procurement aspect of waste management in Kent. The WDF consultation ran concurrently with the JMWMS consultation, with many participants commenting on both. 2.2 STAGES IN STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT The key stages of the Strategy development are illustrated below: Figure 1 – The Strategy Process The Strategy Process Working Principles Criteria (for each tier of hierarchy) Development of ACTION ACTION of Development Reduction & Re-Use Recycling & Composting PLANS Residual Waste Final Objectives & Targets Annex A provides a detailed timeline of the Strategy progression. KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 4 3. OFFICER ENGAGEMENT 3.1 OFFICER WORKSHOPS From August 2005 until April 2006 a series of officer workshops involving representatives from each of the twelve Districts, Boroughs and KCC were run by ERM to develop the draft Strategy. These workshops ensured that all authorities were in agreement and involved when developing the policies. The workshops provided each Authority the time and opportunity to offer their detailed views. 3.2 WHO WAS INVOLVED? There were a number of workshops covering each topic. At least one officer from each of the District and Borough Councils and KCC attended a workshop on each theme. 3.3 MEETING DETAILS • Four ‘Visioning’ workshops were held on 30th August 2005, 9th September 2005, 12th September 2005 and 15th September 2005. As a result of these workshops a set of objectives and important principles were developed. These objectives and principles provided a draft vision for how waste should be managed in Kent in the future. • Three ‘Waste Minimisation and Recycling and Composting’ workshops were held on 7th November 2005, 10th November 2005 and 11th November 2005. The waste growth rate and strategic recycling options, including kerbside collections, were discussed at these meetings. • Three ‘Residual Waste’ workshops were held on 21st November 2005, 22nd November 2005 and 23rd November 2005. This workshop focused on the residual waste technology options available to increase capacity and recovery in Kent. • Four ‘Finding the Way Forward’ workshops were held on 19th April 2006, 21st April 2006 and 28th April 2006. The overall objective of these meetings was to develop the Headline Strategy and the policies within it. KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 5 4. MEMBER ENGAGEMENT 4.1 KENT WASTE FORUM The existing Kent Waste Forum (KWF) steered the process of Strategy development and were used as a vehicle to engage members’ views as representatives of the people of Kent. The meetings involved the presentation of key Strategy information with the opportunity for further discussion. 4.1.1 Who was Involved? Invitees to the KWF meetings included: elected Members and officers from each of the Kent District and Borough councils and Kent County Council and community representatives such as Kent Association of Parish Councils, Medway Council, ReMaDe Kent and Medway and The Environment Agency. 4.1.2 Meeting Details Six KWF meetings were held at specific stages of Strategy development. • 13th October 2005, East Malling Research Centre. Introduction to the Strategy and presentation by ERM consultancy. The Working objectives of the Strategy were agreed. • 13th December 2005, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. Overview of waste minimisation, recycling and residual options, presented by ERM. Copies of the Baseline Report for the Strategy were distributed to all authorities. • 9th March 2006, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. The Strategy timescales were reviewed. ERM discussed their plans to work with individual authorities’ officers in April 2006 and to hold workshops at the end of April with the aim to gain a consensus on waste minimisation, recycling, composting and residual waste options. It was decided that a ‘Headline Strategy’ should be prepared by May 2006. It was agreed that the Headline Strategy should be shared as a consultation draft with the Kent Waste Open Forum representatives during June/July 2006. It was decided that the revised Headline Strategy and Action Plan would be available for adoption for each authority at the end of September 2006. • 5th July 2006, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. The draft consultation Strategy was discussed and agreed upon. The group was informed of the accessibility of the public consultation process and the surrounding publicity. ERM presented the timetable of the next stages of the Strategy development. The development of action plans was addressed. • 19th September 2006, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. An update on the consultation process was given, with details of publicity undertaken. It was noted that all information from the consultation will inform the Headline Strategy and Action Plans. • 16th November 2006, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 6 ERM presented on the consultation responses. Following the consultation feedback, amendments to the Headline Strategy where agreed. The KWF agreed that the Strategy should now be accepted for adoption. 4.2 MEMBER BRIEFINGS Member briefings and roundtable discussions were held to provide Members with the opportunity to discuss the Strategy with ERM and raise any issues. The events provided education and information about the Strategy development. 4.2.1 Meeting Details • June 2005 This briefing introduced the Members to the Strategy process. • 29th November 2005. This briefing offered Members the chance to address issues that were emerging in the preparation of the draft Strategy. • 13th December 2005. During this Member briefing ERM presented the progress so far and the next steps in the Strategy development. • 12th June 2006. At this Member briefing the key features of the draft Headline Strategy were discussed, with particular reference made to recycling and composting targets. KENT WASTE PARTNERSHIP 7 5. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 5.1 KENT WASTE OPEN FORUM MEETINGS Kent Waste Open Forum (KWOF) meetings were held for the key stakeholders in waste management to ensure that the Strategy was informed by a broad range of views. These interactive sessions were held to engage further stakeholder participation. 5.2 WHO WAS INVOLVED? Invitees to the KWOF meetings included: elected Members and officers from each of the Kent District and Borough councils and Kent County Council. Representatives from the voluntary, community and waste industry sectors, the Environment Agency, neighbouring authorities, Parish councils and the local community were also invited to attend. 5.3 MEETING DETAILS Three KWOF were held at key stages of the Strategy development. • 13th October 2005, University of Greenwich Conference Centre, Kings Hill, West Malling. The first meeting focused on the strategy vision and principles. It was agreed that a clear waste management vision statement was necessary for Kent. The group discussed options, initiatives and targets with regards to waste minimisation, recycling and composting. The group evaluated the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme and different waste technology options. • 9th March 2006, University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South East Bedfordshire
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2007 Post-determination & Research Version 4.1 South East Bedfordshire Bedford (E.09.3101) SP94305245 AIP database ID: {571EF0F6-021A-41D1-9133-52A0EAFE31D4} Parish: Turvey Postal Code: MK43 8DB ALL SAINTS' CHURCH, TURVEY Archaeological Observation & Recording Ingham, D Bedford : Albion Archaeology , 2007, 4pp, colour pls, figs Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology A watching brief was undertaken on groundwork associated with improvements. No features or deposits of archaeological significance were discovered, probably due to the fact that the service trenches were not deep enough to encounter archaeological remains. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: UD OASIS ID :albionar1-35955 Mid Bedfordshire (E.09.3102) SP92173930 AIP database ID: {3B436FB9-431E-4FCF-BFF1-CDB7FE4267DC} Parish: Hulcote and Salford Postal Code: MK17 8BU M1 BROUGHTON BROOK OUTFALL M1 Broughton Brook Outfall, Bedfordshire Turner, I Bedford : Albion Archaeology, 2007, Work undertaken by: Albion Archaeology A programme of archaeological observation, investigation and recording was undertaken by Albion Archaeology on engineering works at the M1 Broughton Brook outfall, Bedfordshire. The site lies within an area of archaeological potential, in the vicinity of cropmarks possibly dating to the later prehistoric or Roman periods. Other significant archaeological remains are also located in the surrounding landscape. The engineering works comprised the excavation of a foundation trench for a penstock, and the re-profiling of a length of drainage ditch. No archaeological features, deposits or artefact were revealed during the engineering works. Deep excavations were only carried out for the penstock foundation trench where only geological deposits were encountered. Any potential remains present in the vicinity of the drainage ditch were unlikely to be revealed due to the limited nature of the works in that area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vanguard Way
    THE VANGUARD WAY (NORTH TO SOUTH) From the suburbs to the sea! SECTION 6 Poundgate to Blackboys (6th edition 2019) THE VANGUARD WAY ROUTE DESCRIPTION and points of interest along the route SECTION 6 Poundgate to Blackboys COLIN SAUNDERS In memory of Graham Butler 1949-2018 Sixth Edition (North-South) This 6th edition of the north-south route description was first published in 2019 and replaces previous printed editions published in 1980, 1986 and 1997, also the online 4th and 5th editions published in 2009 and 2014. It is now only available as an online resource. Designed by Brian Bellwood Published by the Vanguards Rambling Club 35 Gerrards Close, Oakwood, London, N14 4RH, England © VANGUARDS RAMBLING CLUB 1980, 1986, 1997, 2009, 2014, 2019 Colin Saunders asserts his right to be identified as the author of this work. Whilst the information contained in this guide was believed to be correct at the time of writing, the author and publishers accept no responsibility for the consequences of any inaccuracies. However, we shall be pleased to receive your comments and information of alterations for consideration. Please email [email protected] or write to Colin Saunders, 35 Gerrards Close, Oakwood, London, N14 4RH, England. Cover photo: Holy Trinity Church in High Hurstwood, East Sussex. cc-by-sa/2.0. © Dave Spicer Vanguard Way Route Description: Section 6 SECTION 6: POUNDGATE TO BLACKBOYS 11.1 km (6.9 miles) This version of the north-south Route Description is based on a completely new survey undertaken by club members in 2018. This section is an idyllic area of rolling countryside and small farms, mostly in open countryside and pastures.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Development Society Limited Is a Not-For-Profit Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England & Wales No.5011634
    railse no. 128 June 2015 Railfuture in London and the South East quarterly branch newsletter The independent campaign for a better passenger and freight rail network Terminal decline of diesels Refreshing electrification London terminals – a group of 14 mainline stations The most recent Network Rail strategy on electrification spread around Zone 1, all but one of which are fully was the Network RUS published back in October 2009. equipped for electric traction, yet half of them are still Since September 2012 the Network RUS Working invaded by noisy, smelly and polluting diesel trains. Group: Electrification ‘refresh’ remit has been to review That’s not to mention the diesels’ higher operating and options for further electrification over the next 30 years, maintenance costs, and generally poorer performance and consider a priority for delivery. A consultation draft in terms of reliability and acceleration. Railfuture has is expected imminently, postponed from pre-purdah. long advocated the various benefits of electric traction. The drivers for further electrification are seen as: ~ reduced rolling stock leasing, maintenance and operating costs; ~ reduced infrastructure maintenance costs; ~ improved rolling stock reliability; ~ reduced journey times and potential reduction in rolling stock requirement; ~ shorter freight routeings and potential release of capacity through more consistent train performance; ~ ability to haul greater freight loads; ~ enhancing capacity on un-electrified routes through cascade of diesel rolling stock; ~ increased network availability through provision of diversionary routes; ~ lower emissions and reduced noise; ~ compliance with environmental policy legislation. The shape of things to come – IEP train for Paddington The ‘Smelly Seven’ stations are: Euston – Virgin’s Voyagers King’s Cross – Grand Central and Hull Trains London Bridge – Southern’s Turbostars, to Uckfield Marylebone – the only all-diesel London terminus Paddington – all, except Heathrow Express/Connect St.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Guidance for Residents
    Kent County Council Waste Management Guide to household waste disposal Guidance document for residents September 2019 4 kent.gov.uk This document can be made available in other formats or languages. To request this, please email [email protected] or telephone 03000 421553 (text relay service 18001 03000 421553). This number goes to an answer machine, which is monitored during office hours. Or write to: Kent County Council, Diversity & Equality Team Room G37, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ 2 Contents Responsibility for Waste Background Information 4 Roles of Authorities in Kent & Current Performance 5 Waste Segregation 6-17 Household Waste Recycling Centres 18-20 Conclusion 21 Waste Collection Authority Contacts 22 Quicklinks 23 Kent County Council Waste Management Mission Our Ambition is to deliver a high quality household waste disposal service, whilst remaining cost- effective for the people of Kent, with an emphasis on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and achieving zero landfill 3 Collection and disposal of waste Background Information Kent County Council (KCC) works in partnership with the Kent District and Borough Councils to find the best solution for the household waste that requires disposal. The aim of this document is to provide clear guidance to residents so they can dispose of their waste in a way that is in line with the Waste Hierarchy enabling waste to be reduced, reused or recycled where possible; and waste being sent for incineration or landfill is as minimal as possible. Prevention Most preferred Preparing for re-use Recycling Other recovery Disposal Least preferred 4 Roles of authorities in Kent District and Borough Councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCAs) and they are responsible for collecting household waste from residents’ houses, referred to as kerbside collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 2019-20
    Authority Monitoring Report 2019 -20 Dover District Local Plan Supporting document DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Contents Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 6 2 Local Plan Progress 9 New Dover District Local Plan 9 Evidence Base Update 10 3 Monitoring of Current Policies 14 Adopted Planning Policies 14 Effectiveness of Development Management Policies 28 4 Five Year Housing Land Supply 34 Five Year Housing Land Supply Calculation 34 5 Strategic Sites 37 Dover Waterfont 37 Dover Mid Town 37 Connaught Barracks 38 Whitfield Urban Expansion 38 White Cliffs Business Park 39 6 Infrastructure 42 Community Infrastructure Levy 42 Monitoring S106 Agreements 42 7 Duty to Co-operate 49 The Duty to Co-operate in Practice 49 Community Consultation 64 8 Neighbourhood Planning 67 9 Conclusion 69 Appendices 1 Monitoring Indicators 71 2 Housing Information Audit 2019/20 78 3 Infrastructure Delivery Table 96 4 Appendix 4 Parish Services and Facilities 106 DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Executive Summary 2 DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW AMR 2019-20 Executive Summary 3 Executive Summary DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN REVIEW 4 Executive Summary Executive Summary 2019/20 HOMES DELIVERED TYPES OF HOMES SHOWING WHERE MOST HOMES PERMITTED 2019/20 WERE DELIVERED IN 2019/20 IN DESCENDING ORDER IN DESCENDING ORDER Dover 3-BED 1,109 = Aylesham PLANNING = Rural 2-BED APPLICATIONS DETERMINED 4-BED Deal 1-BED PLANNING APPLICATIONS 442 HOMES DELIVERED 2019/20 92%OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS 442442 APPROVED S106 CONTRIBUTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for Dover District Neighbourhood Forums 2015-2016
    Protocol for Dover District Neighbourhood Forums 2015-2016 INTRODUCTION 1. Kent County Council and Dover District Council are committed to finding ways to inform, consult and involve local residents. The Dover District Neighbourhood Forums are fundamental to our approach of involving local people in shaping the places in which they live and work. 2. There are five Neighbourhood Forum covering different areas of the district (following the KCC electoral boundaries). These are: o Deal & Walmer Neighbourhood Forum: Middle Deal, Mill Hill, North Deal and Walmer. o Dover North Neighbourhood Forum: Aylesham, Eythorne, Great Mongeham, Guston, Langdon, Nonington, Northbourne, Ringwould with Kingsdown, Ripple, St.Margaret’s at Cliffe, Sutton and Tilmanstone. o Dover Town Neighbourhood Forum: Buckland, Castle. Maxton Elms Vale and Priory, St.Radigunds, Tower Hamlets and Town and Pier. o Dover West Neighbourhood Forum: Alkham, Capel-Le-Ferne, Denton with Wootton, Hougham Without, Lydden, River, Shepherdswell with Coldred, Temple Ewell and Whitfield. o Sandwich Area Neighbourhood Forum: Ash, Eastry, Goodnestone, Preston, Sandwich, Sholden, Staple, Stourmouth, Wingham, Woodnesborough and Worth. 3. The purpose of the Neighbourhood Forums is to: o Engage with local residents, businesses and other community groups in the district; o Provide a key consultative mechanism between all the councils and with the public on policies, plans and strategies; o Assist councillors and other agencies to listen to and respond to their communities; o Discuss an issue of local importance or concern or resolve specific issues; o Advise the council’s cabinet and scrutiny committees on issues of interest or concern in their area TERMS OF REFERENCE 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Area 3.Cdr
    Area 3: Wormshill to Area 3: Wormshill to Landscape Character Areas Landscape Character Areas Otterden North Downs Otterden North Downs Area: From west of the Physical Influence Key Characteristics: A249 to the eastern The chalk landform is very dominant here, with an exhilarating, large-scale boundary of the Borough, character that is reinforced by the medium to large-scale field pattern. The 2 including Bicknor, topography is dramatically undulating, except in the vicinity of Bicknor, with , high, rolling chalk downland Wormshill and Frinstead; extensive views both north and south. The cruciform war memorial, carved dominates; northwards from into the chalk above Lenham, is visible over an extensive area. Harrietsham to the , less extensive dip slope; Borough boundary. , Historical and Cultural Influences wide arable fields contained Although there are few settlements of any size, hamlets such as Otterden by dense woodland belts; have Old English place names (Otter's people rather than to do with otters) , network of small, often and are long established, unlike the central part of the North Downs dip sunken, narrow lanes; Area 3 slope. Wormshill means 'Woden's Hill', dedicated to the chief of the , Teutonic gods. This variant dates from the 13th century. occasional dramatic extensive views over the 5 Low Weald. 4 6 7 Scale Bar 5 Chestnut coppice with oak standards 0 1 2 4 8 km Torry Hill Park lies 1¼ miles east of Frinstead village. This private family home, a copy of the original Georgian building, lies within a 930ha/2,300 Landscape Character acre estate with extensive mid-19th century parkland and 4ha of largely This continuation of the North Downs dipslope is characterised by the very undulating topography, with a very small 20th century garden.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Governance Committee, 13/07
    Despatched: 03.07.15 GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE 13 July 2015 at 6.00 pm Conference Room, Argyle Road, Sevenoaks AGENDA Membership : Chairman: Cllr. Pett Vice -Chairman: Cllr. Ms. Tennessee Cllrs. Dr. Canet, Clack, Halford, Layland and London Pages Contact Apologies for Absence 1. Minutes (Pages 1 - 4) To agree the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 26 February 2015 as a correct record. 2. Declarations of Interest Any interest not already registered 3. Actions arising from the last meeting (if any) 4. Overview of Governance Committee (Pages 5 - 8) Christine Nuttall Tel: 01732 227245 5. The Local Authorities (Standing (Pages 9 - 20) Christine Nuttall Orders)(England)(Amendment) Regulations 2015 - Tel: 01732 227245 Appointment and Dismissal of Senior Officers 6. KCC Boundary Review - Response to Consultation (Pages 21 - 92) Christine Nuttall Tel: 01732 227245 7. Work Plan (Pages 93 - 94) EXEMPT ITEMS (At the time of preparing this agenda there were no exempt items. During any such items which may arise the meeting is likely NOT to be open to the public.) To assist in the speedy and efficient despatch of business, Members wishing to obtain factual information on items included on the Agenda are asked to enquire of the appropriate Contact Officer named on a report prior to the day of the meeting. Should you require a copy of this agenda or any of the reports listed on it in another format please do not hesitate to contact the Democratic Services Team as set out below. For any other queries concerning this agenda or the meeting please contact: The Democratic Services Team (01732 227241) Agenda Item 1 GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting held on 26 February 2015 commencing at 7.00 pm Present : Cllr.
    [Show full text]
  • Milstead, Sittingbourne
    Milstead, Sittingbourne The Coach House Milstead Sittingbourne Kent ME9 0SE Description Ground Floor • Bedroom 12'4 x 11'4 • Hallway (3.76m x 3.45m) • Living Room • Bedroom 20'8 x 13'0 11'10 x 10'3 (6.30m x 3.96m) (3.61m x 3.12m) • Shower Room • Bathroom 9'5 x 7'7 7'9 x 5'10 (2.87m x 2.31m) (2.36m x 1.78m) • Dining Room External 12'5 x 12'2 (3.78m x 3.71m) • Dovecot • Kitchen • Driveway 13'10 x 9'2 (4.22m x 2.79m) • Gardens • Pantry First Floor Please note, this property has oil fired • Landing central heating and private drainage. • Bedroom 20'8 x 13'0 (6.30m x 3.96m) • Bedroom 12'0 x 9'1 (3.66m x 2.77m) Property Aesthetically beautiful, this four-bedroom converted coach house property offers spacious and very well presented accommodation throughout. Set in a lovely plot with lawned garden, patio/terrace with access from the living room and parking to the front; this house is sure to delight even the most discerning of buyers. The accommodation in brief comprises; entrance hallway, well-appointed kitchen featuring a multi-fuel Rayburn, separate dining room with multi-fuel stove, downstairs shower room with a large walk-in shower and under floor heating. The spacious living room which has double doors leading out to the garden terrace and multi-fuel stove. Upstairs there are four spacious bedrooms and family bathroom. Also worthy of particular note is the Grade II Listed square Dovecot which dates back to 1823 which is inscribed in the stone plaque over the doorway.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex County Council Local Transport Plan Rail Development
    East Sussex County Council Local Transport Plan Rail Development Strategy Why do we need a rail strategy? The current Local Transport Plan contains an outline strategy which focusses on the rail network as a local transport system for East Sussex, together with some specific investment targets for the network. However the last free-standing rail strategy for East Sussex was produced in 1990, and it has not been reviewed substantially since then. Important changes in transport policy have taken place in that period, including the far-reaching privatisation of the rail industry. In the context of the continuing uncertainties surrounding the industry, and the Government’s commitment to invest £30bn in rail by 2011, it is now appropriate to develop a new, free-standing rail strategy. Background Two indicators of economic difficulties in East Sussex are insufficient job opportunities for local residents in the coastal areas and an over-reliance on the service sector as a wealth generator. The new rail strategy is aimed at addressing these through improved links to areas where there is a surplus of job opportunities, and, as part of a robust freight strategy for the area, exploring opportunities for freight on rail with the local business community. A key element of the strategy is aimed stimulating the economy of the East Sussex Rural Priority Area through improvements to the Hastings-Rye-Ashford line. The road network in East Sussex is under stress, particularly in the coastal strip where peak spreading is occurring, with important sections of the coastal road network operating at or near design capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Interurban Bus | Time to Raise the Profile V 1.0 | Introduction
    Interurban Bus Time to raise the profile March 2018 Contents Acknowledgements Foreword 1.0 Introduction . 1 2.0 The evolution of Interurban Bus services . 3 3.0 Single route Interurban services (case studies) . 19 4.0 Interurban Bus networks . 35 5.0 Future development: digital and related technologies . 65 6.0 Conclusions and recommendations. 79 Annex A: TrawsCymru network development history and prospects. .A1 Annex B: The development history of Fife’s Express City Connect interurban bus network . A4 Annex C: Short history of Lincolnshire's interurban bus network . A6 www.greengauge21.net © March 2018, Greengauge 21, Some Rights Reserved: We actively encourage people to use our work, and simply request that the use of any of our material is credited to Greengauge 21 in the following way: Greengauge 21, Title, Date Acknowledgements Foreword The authors (Dylan Luke, Jim Steer and Professor Peter White) are grateful to members of the The importance of connectivity in shaping local economic prosperity is much discussed, both in Omnibus Society, who facilitated researching historic records at its Walsall Library. terms of digital (broadband speeds) and personal travel – for instance to access job markets or to reach increasingly ‘regionalised’ key services. Today’s policy makers are even considering re-opening We are also grateful to a number of individuals and organisations whose kind assistance has long closed branch railways to reach places that seem remote or cut off from jobs and opportunity. been very useful in compiling this report. Particular thanks go to David Hall (Network Manager) in respect of the TrawsCymru case study; Sarah Elliott (Marketing Manager) of Stagecoach East Here we examine a mode of transport that is little understood and often over-looked.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Religious Change Final Version.Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Le Baigue, Anne Catherine (2019) Negotiating Religious Change: The Later Reformation in East Kent Parishes 1559-1625. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/76084/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Negotiating Religious Change:the Later Reformation in East Kent Parishes 1559-1625 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies University of Kent April 2019 Word Count: 97,200 Anne Catherine Le Baigue Contents Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Acknowledgements...…………………………………………………………….……………. 3 Notes …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Maps ……..……….……………………………………………………………………………….…. 4 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Chapter 1: Introduction to the diocese with a focus on patronage …….. 34 Chapter 2: The city of Canterbury ……………………………………………………… 67 Chapter 3: The influence of the cathedral ………………………………………….
    [Show full text]