The Influence of Historical and Potential Future Deforestation on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Influence of Historical and Potential Future Deforestation on The Journal of Hydrology 369 (2009) 165–174 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhydrol The influence of historical and potential future deforestation on the stream flow of the Amazon River – Land surface processes and atmospheric feedbacks Michael T. Coe a,*, Marcos H. Costa b, Britaldo S. Soares-Filho c a The Woods Hole Research Center, 149 Woods Hole Rd., Falmouth, MA 02540, USA b The Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-000, Brazil c The Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil article info summary Article history: In this study, results from two sets of numerical simulations are evaluated and presented; one with the Received 18 June 2008 land surface model IBIS forced with prescribed climate and another with the fully coupled atmospheric Received in revised form 27 October 2008 general circulation and land surface model CCM3-IBIS. The results illustrate the influence of historical and Accepted 15 February 2009 potential future deforestation on local evapotranspiration and discharge of the Amazon River system with and without atmospheric feedbacks and clarify a few important points about the impact of defor- This manuscript was handled by K. estation on the Amazon River. In the absence of a continental scale precipitation change, large-scale Georgakakos, Editor-in-Chief, with the deforestation can have a significant impact on large river systems and appears to have already done so assistance of Phillip Arkin, Associate Editor in the Tocantins and Araguaia Rivers, where discharge has increased 25% with little change in precipita- tion. However, with extensive deforestation (e.g. >30% of the Amazon basin) atmospheric feedbacks, Keywords: brought about by differences in the physical structure of the crops and pasture replacing natural vegeta- Amazon tion, cause water balance changes of the same order of magnitude as the changes due to local land surface Discharge processes, but of opposite sign. Additionally, changes in the water balance caused by atmospheric feed- Numerical models backs are not limited to those basins where deforestation has occurred but are spread unevenly through- Deforestation out the entire Amazon by atmospheric circulation. As a result, changes to discharge and aquatic environments with future deforestation of the Amazon will likely be significant and a complex function of how much vegetation has been removed from that particular watershed and how much has been removed from the entire Amazon Basin. Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Introduction and floods routinely disrupt communication, commerce, econom- ics, health and ecology over wide areas of the watershed (Marengo The Amazon River system provides habitat for one of the et al., 2008a,b). With increasing population and infrastructure world’s most diverse aquatic environments and is central to the within the Amazon, future variability and changes to stream flow existence of millions of people. It provides nearly all, domestic are likely to create more frequent and larger disruptions. and commercial transportation in the region. For example, there Global economic and regional population and development are no roads connecting Manaus, an important industrial city of pressures have resulted in high rates of deforestation in the Amazon about 1.2 million people in the center of the Amazon, with the ma- River basin (Achard et al., 2002; Fearnside and Graça, 2006; Kaim- jor population centers in northeastern and southern Brazil. The riv- owitz et al., 2004) and about 17% of the Amazon basin (excluding er also provides drinking water, livelihood, and protein in the form the Tocantins) has been deforested by 2007, mostly in the eastern of fish to the majority of the population of the Amazon. Addition- and southern portion of the basin (Fearnside, 1993; INPE, 1999, ally, major infrastructure investments are planned for the Amazon 2000; Nepstad et al., 1999; Skole et al., 1994; Skole and Tucker, basin, including hydroelectric dams, mining and industrial devel- 1993)(Fig. 1). Cattle ranching is the single largest use of cleared opment, and waterways for barge traffic (Carvalho et al., 2001; land in the Amazon, covering about 75% of total deforested area Laurance et al., 2001). These social, ecological, and economic actors (Faminow, 1998; Margulis, 2003) and herd size in the Amazon has all depend on a stable Amazon River system. doubled since 1996 from about 15 million to 30 million head Despite the popular view that the Amazon contains a near lim- (Nepstad et al., 2006; Simon and Garagorry, 2005). However, soy- itless supply of water, extreme climate events such as droughts bean production, primarily for export as animal feed to Europe and China (Nepstad et al., 2006), has become more important in the last decade and new land is now being converted directly from * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 508 540 9900; fax: +1 508 540 9700. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.T. Coe). cerrado and forest for soybean production. Recent deforestation 0022-1694/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.043 166 M.T. Coe et al. / Journal of Hydrology 369 (2009) 165–174 Fig. 1. Vegetation cover of the Amazon basin with three land covers classes, tropical evergreen forests (green), Cerrado (beige), and agriculture (yellow) shown for potential vegetation (CTL) as reconstructed by Ramankutty and Foley (1998), vegetation distribution of the year 2000 (MOD) as estimated by Eva et al. (2002), and two scenarios for the year 2050 by Soares-Filho et al. (2006) with strong governance of deforestation (GOV) and relatively weak governance (BAU). rates reflect the global demand for Brazilian beef and soybeans with catchment to 17% in the pasture catchment. The second paired about 22,000 km2 deforested each year between 2000 and 2004 experiment compares two 1.2 km2 catchments, Colosso and Açú- (INPE, 2004). Economic conditions and recent trends suggest that Mirim, in Central Amazonia (Trancoso, 2006), concluding that the high rates of Amazonian deforestation for cattle and soybean runoff coefficient increases from 21% in the forest catchment to production will continue well into the future (Alencar et al., 2004; 43% in the pasture catchment. At the large scale, studies in the Carvalho et al., 2001; Kaimowitz et al., 2004; Laurance et al., Tocantins and Araguaia Rivers of eastern Amazonia conclude that 2001; Soares-Filho et al., 2004, 2006). The last 5 months of 2007 rapid land cover changes since 1960 are associated with about a saw a record 7000 km2 of deforestation in the Amazon. 25% increase in the annual mean discharge despite no significant The land surface of the Amazon is coupled to its rivers, streams change in precipitation (Coe et al., 2008; Costa et al., 2003). There- and wetlands, through hydrological processes. Human land cover fore, in eastern Amazonia land cover change appears to have and land use changes influence the quantity of surface water re- already significantly reduced evapotranspiration and increased sources by: Changing how incoming precipitation and radiation runoff and discharge. are partitioned among sensible and latent heat fluxes, runoff, and This reduction in evapotranspiration is a consequence of the river discharge (Bonan et al., 2004; Costa and Foley, 1997; Li land surface processes involved in the exchange of energy and et al., 2007) and altering regional and continental scale precipita- water from the biosphere to the atmosphere. The pastures, with tion patterns (Costa and Foley, 2000; Delire et al., 2001; Dickinson higher albedo, lower leaf area, lower roughness length and shal- and Henderson-Sellers, 1988; Malhi et al., 2008b; Nobre et al., lower roots, usually have a lower evapotranspiration rate than 1991). the forest, particularly during the dry season. Changes in the water and energy balance work at a variety of Global and meso-scale climate model studies indicate, however, time and space scales and the combined influences on the river dis- that once deforestation in the Amazon basin occurs on a very large charge are complex. Observations at micro (<1 km2) or meso scale (>100,000 km2), atmospheric feedbacks may significantly re- (100 s km2) spatial scales in the global tropics and extra-tropics duce regional precipitation. Replacement of forest with higher al- indicate that deforestation reduces evapotranspiration and in- bedo, less water-demanding crops and pastures leads to reduced creases stream flow because of the reduced leaf area index, de- net surface radiation, decreased moisture convergence over the ba- creased root density and depth, and increased soil compaction sin, decreased water recycling, and reduced precipitation (Costa (Bruijnzeel, 1990; Costa, 2005; Sahin and Hall, 1996; Scanlon and Foley, 2000; Dickinson and Henderson-Sellers, 1988; Malhi et al., 2007). Two microscale, paired experiments in Amazonia con- et al., 2008b; Nobre et al., 1991). Recent studies that evaluated firm the results obtained outside of the Amazon. The first paired the effects of partial deforestation on the climate of the region experiment compares two catchments of areas <0.01 km2 in Fazen- (Costa et al., 2007; Sampaio et al., 2007) found that significant da Vitória, eastern Amazonia (Moraes et al., 2006), and found that changes in precipitation occur only after more than 40% of the the ratio of runoff to precipitation increases from 3% in the forest Amazon basin is deforested. M.T. Coe et al. / Journal of Hydrology 369 (2009) 165–174 167 These two processes lead to competing influences on the stream inherent in that data; (2) Understanding the importance of contin- flow, with decreased local evapotranspiration consistent with in- ued and future efforts to reduce deforestation on the local and re- creased discharge and reduced regional precipitation consistent gional health of the Amazon River; continued efforts to reduce with decreased discharge (Costa, 2005; D’Almeida et al., 2006, deforestation can be strengthened by knowledge of the scale of dis- 2007).
Recommended publications
  • Icthyofauna from Streams of Barro Alto and Niquelândia, Upper Tocantins River Basin, Goiás State, Brazil
    Icthyofauna from streams of Barro Alto and Niquelândia, upper Tocantins River Basin, Goiás State, Brazil THIAGO B VIEIRA¹*, LUCIANO C LAJOVICK², CAIO STUART3 & ROGÉRIO P BASTOS4 ¹ Laboratório de Ictiologia de Altamira, Universidade Federal do Para – LIA UFPA e Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação – PPGBC, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Campus Altamira. Rua Coronel José Porfírio 2515, São Sebastião, Altamira, PA. CEP 68372-040, Brasil; [email protected] ² Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Departamento de Ecologia, ICB, UFG, Caixa postal 131, Goiânia, GO, Brasil, CEP 74001-970. [email protected] 3 Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais e Ações IPAAC Rua 34 qd a24 Lt 21a Jardim Goiás Goiânia - Goiás CEP 74805-370. [email protected] 4 Laboratório de Herpetologia e Comportamento Animal, Departamento de Ecologia, ICB, UFG, Caixa postal 131, Goiânia, GO, Brasil, CEP 74001-970. [email protected] *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: In face of the accelerated degradation of streams located within the Brazilian Cerrado, the knowledge of distribution patterns is very important to aid conservation strategies. The aim of this work is to increase the knowledge of the stream’s fish fauna in the State of Goiás, Brazil. 12 streams from the municipalities of Barro Alto and Niquelândia were sampled with trawl nets. During this study, 1247 fishes belonging to 27 species, 11 families, and three orders were collected. Characiformes comprised 1164 specimens of the sampled fishes, the most abundant order, while Perciformes was the less abundant order, with 17 collected specimens. Perciformes fishes were registered only in streams from Niquelândia. Astyanax elachylepis, Bryconops alburnoides and Astyanax aff.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Composition of Phytoplankton in Madeira River
    G.J.B.A.H.S.,Vol.3(1):110-119 (January – March,2014) ISSN: 2319 – 5584 BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF PHYTOPLANKTON AND PHYTOPERIPHYTON IN THE MADEIRA RIVER BASIN, AMAZON, BRAZIL Fabio Aprile1, Assad J. Darwich2, Pedro A. S. Mera2, Rosaluz Tavera3 & Karla K. do A. Serique2 1 Western of Pará Federal University - Ufopa. Av. Marechal Rondon s/n Santarém - PA 68040-070 Brazil. 2 National Institute of Research of Amazonian - Inpa. Av. André Araújo 2936 Manaus - AM 69060-001 Brazil. 3 Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, DF 04510 México. 4 Post-graduation Program of the National Institute of Research of Amazonian – Inpa. Abstract Floristic composition, abundance, richness and many other ecological patterns of phytoplankton and phytoperiphyton were studied in the Madeira River basin, between the Abunã River and Porto Velho City (Rondônia - Brazil), taking into account the hydrological period of the region. The results were correlated with abiotic factors, + + 2+ 2+ - 3- including the nutrients Na , K , Ca , Mg , N-NO3 , P-PO4 and chlorophyll-a. 283 taxa on the Madeira River and 327 taxa in the tributaries were identified belonging to six divisions and nine taxonomic classes. It was observed a considerable complexity in floristic composition, with a greater contribution from the division Chlorophyta, especially during the high water periods, when there was greater species richness recorded. Ecological indexes and statistical analysis confirmed strong seasonal pattern and differentiation between the species present in the white and clear waters. Keywords: floristic composition, diversity index, species richness, landscape ecology, Amazonia. 1. Introduction The Madeira River basin is located in the southwestern Amazonian region, and draining an enormous watershed frequently covered by Tropical Rain- Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME in the AMAZON BASIN: a Typology for Research, Policy and Action
    IGARAPÉ INSTITUTE a think and do tank SP 47 STRATEGIC PAPER 47 PAPER STRATEGIC 2020 AUGUST ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME IN THE AMAZON BASIN: A Typology for Research, Policy and Action Adriana Abdenur, Brodie Ferguson, Ilona Szabo de Carvalho, Melina Risso and Robert Muggah IGARAPÉ INSTITUTE | STRATEGIC PAPER 47 | AUGUST 2020 Index Abstract ���������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction ������������������������������������������������������ 2 Threats to the Amazon Basin ���������������������������� 3 Typology of environmental crime ����������������������� 9 Conclusions ���������������������������������������������������� 16 References ����������������������������������������������������� 17 Annex 1: Dimensions of Illegality ��������������������� 17 Cover photo: Wilson Dias/Agência Brasil IGARAPÉ INSTITUTE | STRATEGIC PAPER 47 | AUGUST 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME IN THE AMAZON BASIN: A Typology for Research, Policy and Action Igarape Institute1 Abstract There is considerable conceptual and practical ambiguity around the dimensions and drivers of environmental crime in the Amazon Basin� Some issues, such as deforestation, have featured prominently in the news media as well as in academic and policy research� Yet, the literature is less developed in relation to other environmental crimes such as land invasion, small-scale clearance for agriculture and ranching, illegal mining, illegal wildlife trafficking, and the construction of informal roads and infrastructure that support these and other unlawful activities� Drawing on
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Landscapes in the Amazon and Congo Basin
    Sustainable Landscapes in the Amazon and Congo Basin ISSUE The Amazon and the Congo Basin are the world’s two largest remaining areas of tropical rainforests, covering 1.1 billion hectares. These forests have high levels of endemism and they harbor more than 200,000 million tons of carbon. Because they represent a large expanse of continuous forest, the Amazon and the Congo Basin exert a regional and global influence on climatic and rainfall patterns. Both ecosystems are also home to forest-dependent people (local communities and Indigenous People) with significant traditional knowledge of forests management. Sustainably managing the Amazon and the Congo Basin forests therefore remains a considerable challenge for humanity. Population growth, the extension of agriculture, energy development, mining and oil extraction, and the associated infrastructure to support this expansion are all placing increased pressures on ecosystems. Fragile governance and the absence of adequate institutions, policies, incentives, and land- use planning undermine the development of effective responses by Government and the private sector. More than 40% of the rainforest remaining on Earth Equally important, the Amazon plays a critical regional is found in the Amazon and it is home to at least 10% and global role in climate regulation. Amazon forests of the world’s known species. The Amazon River help regulate temperature and humidity, and are linked accounts for roughly 16% of the world’s total river to regional climate patterns through hydrological discharge into the oceans. The Amazon River flows cycles that depend on the forests. The Amazon for more than 6,600 km and, with its hundreds of contains 90-140 billion metric tons of carbon, the tributaries and streams, contains the largest number of release of even a portion of which could accelerate freshwater fish species in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Boreal Forests
    Forest Area Key Facts & Carbon Emissions Russia’s Boreal Forests from Deforestation Forest location and brief description Russia is home to more than one-fifth of the world’s forest areas (approximately 763.5 million hectares). The Russian landscape is highly diverse, including polar deserts, arctic and sub-arctic tundra, boreal and semi-tundra larch forests, boreal and temperate coniferous forests, temperate broadleaf and mixed forests, forest-steppe and steppe (temperate grasslands, savannahs, and shrub-lands), semi-deserts and deserts. Russian boreal forests (known in Russia as the taiga) represent the largest forested region on Earth (approximately 12 million km2), larger than the Amazon. These forests have relatively few tree species, and are composed mainly of birch, pine, spruce, fir, with some deciduous species. Mixed in among the forests are bogs, fens, marshes, shallow lakes, rivers and wetlands, which hold vast amounts of water. They contain more than 55 per cent of the world’s conifers, and 11 per cent of the world’s biomass. Unique qualities of forest area Russia’s boreal region includes several important Global 200 ecoregions - a science-based global ranking of the Earth’s most biologically outstanding habitats. Among these is the Eastern-Siberian Taiga, which contains the largest expanse of untouched boreal forest in the world. Russia’s largest populations of brown bear, moose, wolf, red fox, reindeer, and wolverine can be found in this region. Bird species include: the Golden eagle, Black- billed capercaillie, Siberian Spruce grouse, Siberian accentor, Great gray owl, and Naumann’s thrush. Russia’s forests are also home to the Siberian tiger and Far Eastern leopard.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fisheries Resource Use and Status in the Madeira River Basin (Brazil, Bolivia, and Peru) Before Hydroelectric Dam Completion
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE 2018, VOL. 0, NO. 0, 1–21 https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2018.1463511 Review of Fisheries Resource Use and Status in the Madeira River Basin (Brazil, Bolivia, and Peru) Before Hydroelectric Dam Completion Carolina R. C. Doria a,b, Fabrice Duponchelleb,c, Maria Alice L. Limaa, Aurea Garciab,d, Fernando M. Carvajal-Vallejosf, Claudia Coca Mendez e, Michael Fabiano Catarinog, Carlos Edwar de Carvalho Freitasc,g, Blanca Vegae, Guido Miranda-Chumaceroh, and Paul A. Van Dammee,i aLaboratory of Ichthyology and Fisheries – Department of Biology, Federal University of Rond^onia, Porto Velho, Brazil; bLaboratoire Mixte International – Evolution et Domestication de l’Ichtyofaune Amazonienne (LMI – EDIA), Iquitos (Peru), Santa Cruz (Bolivia); cInstitut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD), UMR BOREA (IRD-207, MNHN, CNRS-7208, Sorbonne Universite, Universite Caen Normandie, Universite des Antilles), Montpellier, France; dIIAP, AQUAREC, Iquitos, Peru; eFAUNAGUA, Institute for Applied Research on Aquatic Resources, Sacaba- Cochabamba, Plurinational State of Bolivia; fAlcide d’Orbigny Natural History Museum, ECOSINTEGRALES SRL (Ecological Studies for Integral Development and Nature Conservation), Cochabamba, Plurinational State of Bolivia; gDepartment of Fisheries Science, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil; hWildlife Conservation Society, Greater Madidi Tambopata Landscape Conservation Program, La Paz, Bolivia; iUnit of Limnology and Aquatic Resources (ULTRA), University of San Simon, Cochabamba, Bolivia
    [Show full text]
  • Pay for Performance and Deforestation: Evidence from Brazil ∗
    Pay For Performance and Deforestation: Evidence from Brazil ∗ Liana O. Andersony Torfinn Hardingz Karlygash Kuralbayeva§ Ana M. Pessoa{ Po Yin Wongk May 2021 Abstract We study Brazil’s Bolsa Verde program, which pays extremely poor households for forest conservation. Using a triple difference approach, we find that the program keeps deforestation low in treated areas. In terms of reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, the program benefits are valued at approximately USD 335 million between 2011 and 2015, about 3 times the program costs. The treatment effects increase in the number of beneficiaries and are driven by action on non-private prop- erties. We show suggestive evidence that the BV program provides poor households with incentives to monitor and report on deforesta- tion. (JEL I38, O13, Q23, Q28, Q56) ∗The project is funded by the Research Council of Norway (project number 230860). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. We thank Andre de Lima for his expert assistance with maps and spatial data. We also thank participants at various conferences and seminars for very helpful comments and discussions. We are particularly thankful to Kelsey Jack, our discussant at the NBER SI Environment and Energy Economics 2019, for very detailed comments and suggestions. Remaining potential errors are our own. yNational Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters (CEMADEN) zDepartment of Economics and Finance, University of Stavanger Business School §Department of Political Economy, King’s College London {National Institute for Space Research (INPE) kResearch Department, The Hong Kong Monetary Authority 1 1 Introduction The threat of climate change and the emergence of global climate polices have increased the world community’s attention to conservation.1 A crit- ical (and classical) question is how to best achieve conservation in devel- oping countries with weak enforcement mechanisms and limited financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relevance of the Cerrado's Water
    THE RELEVANCE OF THE CERRADO’S WATER RESOURCES TO THE BRAZILIAN DEVELOPMENT Jorge Enoch Furquim Werneck Lima1; Euzebio Medrado da Silva1; Eduardo Cyrino Oliveira-Filho1; Eder de Souza Martins1; Adriana Reatto1; Vinicius Bof Bufon1 1 Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, km 18, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil, 70670-305. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Cerrado (Brazilian savanna) is the second largest Brazilian biome (204 million hectares) and due to its location in the Brazilian Central Plateau it plays an important role in terms of water production and distribution throughout the country. Eight of the twelve Brazilian hydrographic regions receive water from this Biome. It contributes to more than 90% of the discharge of the São Francisco River, 50% of the Paraná River, and 70% of the Tocantins River. Therefore, the Cerrado is a strategic region for the national hydropower sector, being responsible for more than 50% of the Brazilian hydroelectricity production. Furthermore, it has an outstanding relevance in the national agricultural scenery. Despite of the relatively abundance of water in most of the region, water conflicts are beginning to arise in some areas. The objective of this paper is to discuss the economical and ecological relevance of the water resources of the Cerrado. Key-words: Brazilian savanna; water management; water conflicts. INTRODUCTION The Cerrado is the second largest Brazilian biome in extension, with about 204 million hectares, occupying 24% of the national territory approximately. Its largest portion is located within the Brazilian Central Plateau which consists of higher altitude areas in the central part of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic South America Section 1 MAIN IDEAS 1
    Name _____________________________ Class __________________ Date ___________________ Atlantic South America Section 1 MAIN IDEAS 1. Physical features of Atlantic South America include large rivers, plateaus, and plains. 2. Climate and vegetation in the region range from cool, dry plains to warm, humid forests. 3. The rain forest is a major source of natural resources. Key Terms and Places Amazon River 4,000-mile-long river that flows eastward across northern Brazil Río de la Plata an estuary that connects the Paraná River and the Atlantic Ocean estuary a partially enclosed body of water where freshwater mixes with salty seawater Pampas wide, grassy plains in central Argentina deforestation the clearing of trees soil exhaustion soil that has become infertile because it has lost nutrients needed by plants Section Summary PHYSICAL FEATURES The region of Atlantic South America includes four What four countries make countries: Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and up Atlantic South America? Paraguay. A major river system in the region is the _______________________ Amazon. The Amazon River extends from the _______________________ Andes Mountains in Peru to the Atlantic Ocean. The _______________________ Amazon carries more water than any other river in _______________________ the world. The Paraná River, which drains much of the central part of South America, flows into an estuary called the Río de la Plata and the Atlantic Ocean. The region’s landforms mainly consist of plains and plateaus. The Amazon Basin in northern Brazil What is the Amazon Basin? is a huge, flat floodplain. Farther south are the _______________________ Brazilian Highlands and an area of high plains _______________________ called the Mato Grosso Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Planning in the Amazon Basin: Challenges from Resilience Thinking
    Copyright © 2020 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Ruiz Agudelo, C. A., N. Mazzeo, I. Díaz, M. P. Barral, G. Piñeiro, I. Gadino, I. Roche, and R. Acuña. 2020. Land use planning in the Amazon basin: challenges from resilience thinking. Ecology and Society 25(1):8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11352-250108 Insight, part of a Special Feature on Seeking sustainable pathways for land use in Latin America Land use planning in the Amazon basin: challenges from resilience thinking Cesar A. Ruiz Agudelo 1, Nestor Mazzeo 2,3, Ismael Díaz 3, Maria P. Barral 4,5, Gervasio Piñeiro 6, Isabel Gadino 3, Ingid Roche 3 and Rocio Juliana Acuña-Posada 7 ABSTRACT. Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes of Eastern Bolivia and the Madeira Headwaters
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 143 HANDBOOK OF SOUTH AMERICAN INDIANS Julian H. Steward, Editor Volume 3 THE TROPICAL FOREST TRIBES Prepared in Cooperation With the United States Department of State as a Project of the Interdepartmental Committee on Scientific and Cultural Cooperation Extraído do volume 3 (1948) Handbook of South American Indians. Disponível para download em http://www.etnolinguistica.org/hsai UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1948 For aale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Goyernment Frintinc Office. Washington 25, D. C. TRIBES OF EASTERN BOLIVIA AND THE MADEIRA HEADWATERS By Alfred Metraux THE CHIQUITOANS AND OTHER TRIBES OF THE PROVINCE OF CHIQUITOS TRIBAL DIVISIONS AND LANGUAGES It is extremely difficult to obtain a clear picture of the linguistic affili- ations or even of the exact locations of the tribes of the region known as the Province of Chiquitos, bordered on the south by the Chaco desert, on the east by the Paraguay River and by the marshes of its upper course, on the west by the Rio Grande (Guapay River), and on the north by a line more or less corresponding to lat. 15° W. (map 1, No. 2 ; map 4). The chronicles of the Conquest, the official documents and reports of local authorities, and later the letters and accounts of the Jesuits teem with names of tribes and subtribes, but seldom mention their linguistic affiliation and even their location. From the beginning of the Conquest, the Indians of the area just defined have been called Chiquito, "the small ones," irrespective of their linguistic family or culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 8(3): 592-594, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution N
    Check List 8(3): 592-594, 2012 © 2012 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution N ISTRIBUTIO New records of fishes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi) from D the Upper Tapajós River Basin 1 1 1, 2* RAPHIC G Fernando C. P. Dagosta , Murilo N. L. Pastana and André L. H. Esguícero EO G N 1 Universidade de São Paulo - FFCLRP, Laboratório de Ictiologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Biologia. Avenida dos Bandeirantes, 3900. CEP O 14040-901. Ribeirão Preto, SP, [email protected]. 2 Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga. CEP 04218-970. São Paulo, SP, Brazil. OTES * Corresponding author. E-mail: N Abstract: Sartor Tatia intermedia Sartor The firstTatia report intermedia of (Anostomidae) and (Auchenipteridae) for the Upper Tapajós River Basin are presented here. is very rare on collections, and is reported only from the Trombetas, Tocantins and Upper Xingu river basins. is registered in the upper reaches of the Araguaia, Tocantins, Xingu, and Capim rivers, tributaries of the lower Amazon River in Brazil, northwards to the Suriname coastal rivers and the Essequibo River in Guyana. S. tucuruiense Since freshwater fishes are embedded within a It differs from by body depth (18.1-19.8 vs. terrestrial landscape that limits dispersal within and 23-25.9% of SL), caudal peduncle length (15-18.1 vs. 18.5- among drainage basins it can provide unique opportunities 20% of SL), caudal peduncle depth (8.6-9.8 vs. 10.4-11.2% for the identificationet al.of distribution patterns, which may of SL), interorbital width (38-41.8 vs.
    [Show full text]