DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared for Terra Pacis Environmental (Pty) Ltd By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared for Terra Pacis Environmental (Pty) Ltd By 1 R. Archaeological Impact Assessment FOR THE PROPOSED KYA SANDS EXTENSION 104 PROJECT, GAUTENG Prepared For Terra Pacis Environmental (Pty) Ltd By TEL: +27 82 373 8491. E –MAIL [email protected] VERSION 1.0 20 May 2015 VERSION 2.0 Revised 24 June 2016 2 CLIENT: Terra Pacis Environmental (Pty) Ltd CONTACT PERSON: Paula Tolksdorff Office No: (011) 781-7800 Cell No: 082 376 2497 Fax No: (011) 447-7100 Email: [email protected] SIGNATURE: ____________________________ LEADING CONSULTANT: Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC CONTACT PERSON: Jaco van der Walt Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting Professional Member of the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologist (#159) I, Jaco van der Walt as duly authorised representative of Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC, hereby confirm my independence as a specialist and declare that neither I nor the Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC have any interest, be it business, financial, personal or other, in any proposed activity, application or appeal in respect of which the client was appointed as Environmental Assessment practitioner, other than fair remuneration for work performed on this project. SIGNATURE: ______________________________ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site name and location: Kya Sand Extension 104 is a proposed Light Industrial Development located on Holding 4 and 6 of the Trevallyn Agricultural Holdings, Kya Sands, Gauteng. Purpose of the study: Phase 1 Archaeological Impact Assessment to determine the presence of cultural heritage sites and the impact of the proposed project on these resources within the study area. 1:50 000 Topographic map: 2627 BB Environmental Consultant: Terra Pacis Environmental (Pty) Ltd Developer: Columbia Falls Properties 121 (Pty) Ltd Heritage Consultant: Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC (HCAC) Contact person: Jaco van der Walt Tel: +27 82 373 8491 E –mail [email protected]. Date of Report: 20 May 2015 Findings of the Assessment: HCAC was appointed to assess the study area in terms of the archaeological component of Section 35 of the NHRA as part of the basic assessment for the project. No raw material suitable for stone tool manufacture occurs in the study area and no ceramics or stone walls attributed to the Iron Age were recorded. Similarly no sites of archaeological significance were recorded by other studies in the area (e.g. Coetzee (2008) and van Schalkwyk (2013). No further mitigation prior to construction is recommended in terms of Section 35 for the proposed development to proceed. In terms of the built environment of the area (Section 34), no standing structures older than 60 years occur within the study area. From the 1943 topographic map of the study area it is clear that no historical features occurred in the area. In terms of Section 36 of the Act no burial sites were recorded in the study area. However if any graves are located in future they should ideally be preserved in-situ or alternatively relocated according to existing legislation. Due to the subsurface nature of archaeological remains and the fact that graves can occur anywhere on the landscape, it is recommended that a chance find procedure is implemented for the project as part of the EMP The study area is surrounded by industrial and residential developments and no significant cultural landscapes or viewscapes were noted during the fieldwork. Due to the lack of significant heritage features in the study area there is from an archaeological point of view no reason why the development cannot commence based on approval from SAHRA. 4 Disclaimer: Although all possible care is taken to identify sites of cultural importance during the investigation of study areas, it is always possible that hidden or sub-surface sites could be overlooked during the study. Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC and its personnel will not be held liable for such oversights or for costs incurred as a result of such oversights. Copyright: Copyright of all documents, drawings and records – whether manually or electronically produced – that form part of the submission, and any subsequent reports or project documents, vests in Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC. None of the documents, drawings or records may be used or applied in any manner, nor may they be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever for or to any other person, without the prior written consent of Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC. The Client, on acceptance of any submission by Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC and on condition that the Client pays to Heritage Contracts and Archaeological Consulting CC the full price for the work as agreed, shall be entitled to use for its own benefit and for the specified project only: . The results of the project; . The technology described in any report; . Recommendations delivered to the Client. 5 CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION.................................................................................. 8 1.1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................ 8 1.1.1 Phase 1 - Desktop Study ......................................................................... 8 1.1.2 Phase 2 - Physical Survey ....................................................................... 8 1.1.3 Phase 3 - Reporting ................................................................................ 8 1.2 Archaeological Legislation and Best Practice .............................................. 9 1.3 Description of Project Site ..................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Location Data ...................................................................................... 10 2 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... 12 2.1 Phase 1 - Desktop Study ....................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Literature Search ................................................................................. 12 2.1.2 Information Collection .......................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Consultation ........................................................................................ 12 2.1.4 Google Earth and Mapping Survey.......................................................... 12 2.1.5 Genealogical Society of South Africa ....................................................... 12 2.2 Phase 2 - Physical Survey ..................................................................... 12 2.3 Assumptions and Limitation ................................................................... 12 3 NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 13 4 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY AREA13 4.1 Databases Consulted ............................................................................ 13 4.1.1 Wits Archaeological Database ................................................................ 13 4.1.2 South African Heritage Resources Agency Report Mapping Project .............. 13 4.1.3 Genealogical Society and Google Earth Monuments .................................. 13 4.2 Archaeological and Historical Information Available .................................. 13 4.2.1 Historiography and Methodology ............................................................ 13 4.2.2 Historical background of the area ........................................................... 13 4.2.3 Johannesburg ...................................................................................... 14 4.2.4 History of Kya Sands .................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2.5 Archaeology of the Area ........................................................................ 14 5 HERITAGE SITE SIGNIFICANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES .................... 15 5.1 Field Rating of Sites ............................................................................. 16 6 BASELINE STUDY-DESCRIPTION OF SITES ........................................................ 16 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .......................................................... 21 8 PROJECT TEAM ........................................................................................................... 22 9 STATEMENT OF COMPETENCY ................................................................................ 23 10 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 24 6 FIGURES Figure 1: Locality Map indicating the proposed study area. ......................................................... 11 Figure 2: Eastern section of study area. ............................................................................................... 18 Figure 3: South eastern section of the study area. .......................................................................... 18 Figure 4: Study area viewed from the north. ..................................................................................... 18 Figure 5: Central portion of the study area. ....................................................................................... 18 Figure 6: Google image of the deviation that was surveyed marked in blue with track logs in black. ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7.5. Identified Sites of Significance Residential Buildings Within Rosettenville (Semi-Detached, Freestanding)
    7.5. Identified sites of significance_Residential buildings within Rosettenville (Semi-detached, freestanding) Introduction Residential buildings are buildings that are generally used for residential purposes or have been zoned for residential usage. It must be noted the majority of residences are over 60 years, it was therefore imperative for detailed visual study to be done where the most significant buildings were mapped out. Their significance could be as a result of them being associated to prominent figures, association with special events, design patterns of a certain period in history, rarity or part of an important architectural school. Most of the sites identified in this category are of importance in their local contexts and are representative of the historical and cultural patterns that could be discerned from the built environment. All the identified sites were given a 3A category explained below. Grading 3A_Sites that have a highly significant association with a historic person, social grouping, historic events, public memories, historical activities, and historical landmarks (should by all means be conserved) 3B_ Buildings of marginally lesser significance (possibility of senstive alteration and addition to the interior) 3C_Buildings and or sites whose significance is in large part significance that contributes to the character of significance of the environs (possibility for alteration and addition to the exterior) Summary Table of identified sites in the residential category: Site/ Description Provisional Heritage Implications
    [Show full text]
  • The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, the Early Days. Compiled by René
    The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, The Early Days. Compiled by René de Villiers. Proclamation of The Reserve The Klip Riviersberg Nature Reserve, or the reserve for short, has always had a special place in the hearts and minds of the people living along its borders and is safe to say that most of the residents in Mondeor feel that way about it. It was certainly the case in the early days of the reserve, and I count myself among them. Since the very early days the Klipriviersberg Nature Reserve Association (KNRA) had been arranging guided walks in the reserve, and with the modest finances at its disposal strove to keep alien vegetation in check, combat fires, arrange guided walks and bring the reserve to the attention of the greater Johannesburg and the rest of the country. One of its earliest projects was to lobby, successfully, for the formal proclamation of the area as a nature reserve. For the record, it was proclaimed on 9th October 1984 in terms of section 14 of the Nature Conservation Ordinance (Ordinance 12 of 1983); Administrator’s Notice 1827. It comprises Erf 49 Alan Manor, Erf 1472 Mondeor, Erf 1353 Kibler Park and Ptn 14 of the Farm Rietvlei 101. All of these erven belong to the (then) Johannesburg City Council Parks and Recreation Department. Portion 17 of the farm Rietvlei 101 which falls within the fenced borders of the reserve, belongs to the University of the Witwatersrand. In all its endeavours the KNRA has done a sterling job and we owe a large debt of gratitude to those early pioneering committees and members in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Johannesburg Spatial Development Framework 2040
    City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality Spatial Development Framework 2040 In collaboration with: Iyer Urban Design, UN Habitat, Urban Morphology and Complex Systems Institute and the French Development Agency City of Johannesburg: Department of Development Planning 2016 Table of Contents Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Existing Spatial Structure of Johannesburg and its Shortcomings ........................................ 11 2.2. Transformation Agenda: Towards a Spatially Just City ......................................................... 12 2.3. Spatial Vision: A Compact Polycentric City ........................................................................... 12 2.4. Spatial Framework and Implementation Strategy ................................................................ 17 2.4.1. An integrated natural structure .................................................................................... 17 2.4.2. Transformation Zone ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pikitup Waste Facilities-Private Recyclers
    Sector Class Waste_Focus Management Existing/Proposed Company Name/ Site Name City Longitude Latitude Physical Address Materials Recycled Equipment Depot Region CIP/Pikitup_ref Pikitup Landfill assigned Column3 Priority Co-Operatives Recycling Pikitup Existing ABNP/BFGA Coop Johannesburg 28,038314 -26,231728 Robinson Deep Landfill. Turffontein Road, Turfontein SOUTHDALE F Robinson Deep / Goudkoppies Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Allie Street Garden Site Johannesburg 27,885747 -26,299961 Allie Street Eldorado Park Ext 9 No Recycling, Green Waste, Occasional Waste AVALON G Goudkoppies/Ennerdale Recycling Company Recycling Private Existing Amalgamated Metals Recycling Johannesburg 27,865584 -26,153144 2849 Albertina Sisulu Road,Cnr Nywerheid Manufacta RoodepoortMetals ROODEPOORTC Marie Louise Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Ashanti Garden Site Johannesburg 27,979519 -26,195217 Ashanti Street (RE 560) Coronationville Plastic only. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow, Green Waste, OccasionalWATERVAL WasteB Robinson Deep Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Ashburton Garden Site Johannesburg 27,982678 -26,212214 Ashburton Street, Riverlea Cardboard. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow, Green Waste, OccasionalWATERVAL WasteB Robinson Deep Depot Logistics Pikitup Existing Avalon Depot Johannesburg 27,877553 -26,289331 Calandula Street, Klipspruit West AVALON D Goudkoppies/Ennerdale Garden Site Recycling Pikitup Existing Babiana Garden Site Johannesburg 27,960594 -26,203431 Babiana Street, Riverlea Cardboard. Builders' Rubble 1 x Wheelbarrow,
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION O Attribution — You Must Give Appropriate Credit, Provide
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=Research%20Output (Accessed: Date). Characterizing selected invasive plants in the Klipriviersberg Nature Reserve using field based spectroradiometer data By: Bambo Dubula (201378775) A Minor Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of MSc in Environmental Management in the Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy studies. In the Faculty of Science At the University of Johannesburg Supervisor: Dr Solomon G. Tefsamichael Co-Supervisor: Dr Isaac T. Rampedi October 2015 Abstract The Klipriviersberg Nature Reserve has proportionally large number of invasive plant species (Morné Britz, personal communication). Management of these species currently focuses on conspicuous woody species and less attention is placed on smaller plant species that are likely to threaten biodiversity. This can potentially result in more costly and labour intensive management programmes if imminent environmental threats are not timeously identified. The use of timely spatial distribution maps aids in improving invasive plant management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORDER of APPEARANCES Urban Renewal in Johannesburg Mpho Matsipa
    THE ORDER OF APPEARANCES Urban Renewal in Johannesburg By Mpho Matsipa A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Nezar Alsayyad, Chair Professor Greig Crysler Professor Ananya Roy Spring 2014 THE ORDER OF APPEARANCES Urban Renewal in Johannesburg Mpho Matsipa TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract i Acknowledgements ii List of Illustrations iii List of Abbreviations vi EAVESDROPPING 1 0.1 Regimes of Representation 6 0.2 Theorizing Globalization in Johannesburg 9 0.2.1 Neo‐liberal Urbanisms 10 0.2.2 Aesthetics and Subject Formation 12 0.2.3 Race Gender and Representation 13 0.3 A note on Methodology 14 0.4 Organization of the Text 15 1 EXCAVATING AT THE MARGINS 17 1.1 Barbaric Lands 18 1.1.1 Segregation: 1910 – 1948 23 1.1.2 Grand Apartheid: 1948 – 1960s 26 1.1.3 Late Apartheid: 1973 – 1990s 28 1.1.4 Post ‐ Apartheid: 1994 – 2010 30 1.2 Locating Black Women in Johannesburg 31 1.2.1 Excavations 36 2 THE LANDSCAPE OF PUBLIC ART IN JOHANNESBURG 39 2.1 Unmapping the City 43 2.1.1 The Dying Days of Apartheid: 1970‐ 1994 43 2.1.2 The Fiscal Abyss 45 2.2 Pioneers of the Cultural Arc 49 2.2.1 City Visions 49 2.2.2 Birth of the World Class African City 54 2.2.3 The Johannesburg Development Agency 58 2.3 Radical Fragments 61 2.3.1 The Johannesburg Art in Public Places Policy 63 3 THE CITY AS A WORK OF ART 69 3.1 Long Live the Dead Queen 72 3.1.2 Dereliction Can be Beautiful 75 3.1.2 Johannesburg Art City 79 3.2 Frontiers 84 3.2.1 The Central Johannesburg Partnership 19992 – 2010 85 3.2.2 City Improvement Districts and the Urban Enclave 87 3.3 Enframing the City 92 3.3.1 Black Woman as Trope 94 3.3.2 Branding, Art and Real Estate Values 98 4 DISPLACEMENT 102 4.1 Woza Sweet‐heart 104 4.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan (IDP) 2019/20 Review
    INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2019/20 REVIEW Advancing Diphetogo CITY OF JOHANNESBURG IDP 2019/20 REVIEW Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 1 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 5 Johannesburg today ........................................................................................................... 7 Vision, Mission and Values Proposition ............................................................................ 8 Vision ............................................................................................................................. 8 Mission .......................................................................................................................... 8 Five Growth and Development Outcomes ...................................................................... 8 Nine Strategic Priorities ................................................................................................. 8 Message from the Executive Mayor ................................................................................... 9 Message from the City Manager ...................................................................................... 10 Introduction to the 2019/20 IDP Review ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Historical Overview of the Corridors of Freedom
    APPENDIX A_Historical overview of the Corridors of Freedom By Clive Chipkin Geology & Topography GEOLOGY and the 19-century World Market determined the locality of Johannesburg. TOPOGRAPHY contributes significantly to the sense of place, the genius loci, in a region of low hills and linear ridges. Gatsrand, 30 Km to the South; Suikerbosrand, 30 Km to the South East; the Klipriviersberg immediately to the South. In the foreground are the parallel East- West scarps and residue hills of the area magically named the Witwatersrand, looking northwards across a panorama of rolling country and gently sloping valleys to the Magaliesberg horizon – all part of the multiple Johannesburg immersion. Fig. 168 Section of topographical map of Johannesburg. (Source: Office of Surveyor General, Cape Town, surveyed in 1939) The great plains of the continental plateau enters the town-lands: the Houghton- Saxonwold plain north of the ridges and Doornfontein to Turffontein plain occupying the space between the Braamfontein high ground and the Klipriviersberg. The spaciousness – a word used by the visiting geographer JHG Lebon (1952:An Introduction to Human Geography) – of the landscape means that Johannesburg, unlike Durban and Cape Town can expand in almost any direction but after a century plus decades of urban growth, it is our delectable ridges that remain repositories of ancientness. The north facing Parktown ridge with its extension on the Westcliff promontory and its continuation as the Houghton and Orange Grove escarpment to the east 244 Monika Läuferts le Roux & Judith Muindisi, tsica heritage consultants Office: 5th Avenue, 41 – Westdene – 2092 – Johannesburg; Tel: 011 477-8821 [email protected] form a decisive topographical feature defining the major portion of the Northern Suburbs as well and the ancient routes of the wagon roads to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • The Term "Grassland" Second Only to the Well-Known Fynbos Biome
    GRASSLANDS AROUND THE WORLD Grasslands cover 40% of the earth’s non-ice bound terrestial surface and are home to over 1 billion people. They contain biodiversity of global significance and provide ecosystem goods and services that support human life. However, temperate grasslands across the world are one of the biomes most impacted by anthropogenic activities. The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment highlighted that globally more than 70% of the grasslands biome had lost its natural cover by 1950. An additional 15,4 % has been lost since then. GRASSLANDS IN SOUTH AFRICA The grasslands biome is the second largest biome in South Africa, covering 29% of South Africa and occurring in 8 provinces including Gauteng, Limpopo, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga, KwaZulu- Natal, Free State, North West and the Northern Cape. Grasslands in South Africa have high species richness and high turnover of biodiversity across the landscape. The South African grasslands are a very old, complex and slowly evolved system with indigenous species diversity The term "grassland" second only to the well-known fynbos biome. The grasslands also play a vital role in water creates the impression production.The term ‘grasslands’ creates the impression that the biome consists only of grass species. In fact, only one in six plant species in the biome is a grass. The remainder includes that the biome consists bulbous plants such as arum lilies, orchids, red-hot pokers, aloes, watsonias, gladioli, ground only of grass species. orchids and undergorund trees. There are also many other species, such as blue cranes, swallows, habitats and ecosystems that form an important part of the grasslands biome, including rivers In fact, only one in six and wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop17 Tour Brochure
    COP 17 TOUR INFORMATION SOUTH AFRICA TOUR PACKAGES SOUTH AFRICA These tours are offered at a cost with different packages available. SOWETO HALF DAY TOUR: R690pp FULL DAY WITH LUNCH: R895pp Soweto is a symbol of the New South Africa, caught between old squatter misery and new prosperity, squalor and an upbeat lifestyle, it’s a vibrant city which still openly bears the scars of the Apartheid past and yet shows what’s possible in the New South Africa. This tour is innovative and highly diverse with customised experiences allowing you the opportunity to touch South Africa. TOUR INCLUDES: Return Hotel Transfer. Entrance fees to Hector Pieterson Museum and Mandela Museum. Visit an informal settlement and photographic restaurant. Walk through the Regina Mundi Church. CONTINUED… SOWETO HALF DAY TOUR: R690pp FULL DAY WITH LUNCH: R895pp TOUR INCLUDES (CONTINUED): - Drive along Vilakazi Street. - Visit Freedom Square and Freedom Charter Memorial. - See the homes of Nobel peace prize winner Archbishop Emeritus. - Desmond Tutu and Winnie Madikizela- Mandela. - Visit a local shebeen and taste a beer drunk by the people of Soweto if your older than 18 years. Learn to make your own Amagwinya (Fat Cakes) from Mum B’s kitchen Bottled water. SOWETO BICYCLE AND BUS TOUR: R900 PER PERSON TOUR INCLUDES: - Return Hotel Transfer. - Entrapast Soccer City. - Visit Meadowlands. - Light Lunch & Bottled Water. - Entrance fee to Hector Pieterson Museum. - Soweto Bicycle Tour: 1-1.5 Hours. - Visit the Mzimhlope Hostel. - Ride along Vilakazi Street to Mandela House Museum. - Nobel Peace Prize winner Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu. CONTINUED… SOWETO BICYCLE AND BUS TOUR: R900 PER PERSON TOUR INCLUDES (CONTINUED): - Walk through the Regina Mundi Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauteng Johannesburg Main Seat of Johannesburg Central Magisterial
    # # !C # # # ## ^ !C# !.!C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # !C# # # # # # !C # ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # !C # # !C # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # ## # !C # # # # # !C # # # # # # # #!C # !C # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # !C # # ^ # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # ##^ !C # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # ## # # # #!C # !C# # # ##!C # # # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ !C # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C !C # # # # # # # # !C # # #!C # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # ### !C # # !C # # # # !C # ## ## ## !C # # !C # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # !C ## # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # !C !C### # # # ## # !C # # # # # !C# # # # # # # !C # # # # !C # ^ # # # !C # ^ # # ## !C # # # !C #!C ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # #
    [Show full text]