DOCSLIB.ORG

Mid-Term Review – Laos SAFE Ecosystems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mid-Term Review – Laos SAFE Ecosystems Mid-Term Review – Laos SAFE Ecosystems Sustainable Forest and Land Management in the Dry Dipterocarp Forest Ecosystems of Southern Lao PDR a project of: Government of Laos Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Global Environment Facility (GEF) April 7, 2020 Prepared by: Eugenia Katsigris, Managing Director, Parnon Group Latsany Phakdisoth, National Consultant Laos SAFE Ecosystems Project Mid-Term Review Basic Project/ MTR Information and Acknowledgements Basic Project Information Official Project Title: Sustainable Forest and Land Management in the Dry Dipterocarp Forest Ecosystems of Southern Lao PDR Country: Lao People’s Democratic Republic Region: Asia Pacific UNDP PIMS# 5448 GEF Project ID# 6940 IP and Other Project Partners: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and its Department of Forests (DOF); Savannakhet Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office (PAFO); District Agriculture and Forestry Offices (DAFOs) of Xonaboully, Songkhone, Thapangthong, Phine, and Phalangxay GEF Operational Focal Area: Multi-focal area --- (1) SFM (Sustainable Forest Management); (1) BD (Biodiversity), and (3) LD (Land Degradation) GEF Strategic Programs: Focal Area Strategic Objective Strategic Program under Focal Area Objective BD-1 Improve sustainability of protected area Program 1: Improving financial sustainability and systems effective management of the national ecological infrastructure Program 2: Nature’s last stand: expanding the reach of the global protected area estate LD-3 Reduce pressures on natural resources by Program 4: Scaling-up sustainable land management managing competing land uses in broader through the landscape approach landscapes SFM-1 Maintained Forest Resources: Reduce Program 1: Integrated land use planning the pressures on high conservation value Program 2: Identification and maintenance of high forests by addressing the drivers of conservation value forests deforestation SFM-3. Restored Forest Ecosystems: Reverse Program 7: Building technical and institutional the loss of ecosystem services within degraded capacities to identify degraded forest landscapes and forest landscapes monitor forest restoration. Program 8: Integrating SFM in landscape restoration. MTR Team Members Eugenia Katsigris, Managing Director of Parnon Group: International Consultant Latsany Phakdisoth, National Consultant MTR Timeline Mission: October 28 – November 8, 2019 Vientiane and Savannakhet Province, including Savannakhet Provincial Seat, Ong Mang Center and Ong Mang Protected Area/ Xonnabouly District, Songkhone District, and Thapangthong District Main Work: October 15, 2019 – January 13, 2020 (from start of document review to full draft report) Reviews of Draft Report and Finalization (first round of comments): Dec. 30, 2019 – March 6, 2020 Reviews of Draft Report and Finalization (second round of comments): March 6 – April 7, 2020 i Laos SAFE Ecosystems Project Mid-Term Review Acknowledgements The mid-term review (MTR) team is highly appreciative of the contributions of the many stakeholders who supported the MTR through generous contributions of their time, effort, and insights during, before, and after the mission. In particular, the Laos SAFE Ecosystems project team and project leadership at the national, provincial, and local levels provided great help with coordinating and facilitating the mission and shared their insights via in-depth consultations with us. This includes, at the national-level, the staff of the Vientiane-based PMU and involved officials from the Department of Forestry. At the provincial level, this includes staff of the Savannakhet-based PMU and involved officials from the Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office (PAFO). At the local level, it includes staff of the Ong Mang Center and involved officials from the District Agriculture and Forestry Offices (DAFOs) of the five project districts. We are also greatly appreciative of the villagers in the five villages in the Ong Mang Protected Area that were visited during the mission: They took time to meet with us, explain their experience with and views on the project, and show us relevant sites within their villages. UNDP leadership and team members were also extremely helpful to the MTR team, including those from UNDP Laos CO, who met with us multiple times to discuss the aims and preliminary findings of the MTR, and the UNDP-GEF RTA, who provided greatly valued input. We would also like to thank both national and provincial level officials from government entities other than the aforementioned that took the time to meet with us and share with us their roles in the project and their input on project results. Finally, we would also like to thank the consultants, consulting organizations, and other experts who took the time to explain their work for the project to us and/or share their expertise. In sum, we thank all the individuals who shared their insights with us and helped facilitate our mission and document review work and fulfill our requests for additional information. If this report is in the end able to support valuable course correction as hoped, improving project results and their sustainability for the nation and world, it will be the aggregate contributions of these individuals that will have made this possible. Specific organizations and individuals are noted with more detail in the realized mission and consultation schedule provided in Annex 1. We wish to thank all of those listed as well as some who participated in meetings or site visits whose names are not included. ii Laos SAFE Ecosystems Project Mid-Term Review Contents Basic Project/ MTR Information and Acknowledgements .................................................. i Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Definitions ........................................................................ iv Project Information Table .................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction to MTR ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Project Description and Background Context ................................................................. 5 2.1 Background Context ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Project Basic Design ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Project History and Implementation Arrangements .............................................................................. 12 3. Assessment of Project Relevance and Design ............................................................... 14 3.1 Relevance .............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Design Quality, including Results Framework/Logframe .................................................................... 17 4. Project Results Overall and Main Concerns .................................................................. 21 5. Component 1 Results: Policy, Compliance, and Enforcement Capacity ...................... 40 6. Component 2 Results: Sustainable Forest Management and Protected Area Expansion ........................................................................................................................................... 44 7. Component 3 Results: Incentives and Financing for Biodiversity Conservation and Forest Protection ................................................................................................................ 49 8. Sustainability of Results ................................................................................................ 54 9. Implementation and Adaptive Management ................................................................. 55 9.1 Management Arrangements/ Institutional ............................................................................................. 55 9.2 Work Planning ...................................................................................................................................... 59 9.3 Finance: Expenditure Analysis and Co-financing................................................................................. 60 9.4 Other Implementation: M&E, Stakeholder Engagement, Communications, and Gender ............................................................................................................................... 88 10. Conclusions, Lessons, and Recommendations ............................................................ 90 10-1. Conclusions and Lessons ................................................................................................................... 90 10-2. Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 97 Annex 1. Mid-Term Review Interviews and Site Visits – Realized Schedule ............... 106 Annex 2. Master Interview Guide ................................................................................... 109 Annex 3. Documents Reviewed ...................................................................................... 112 Annex 4. Proposed Revised Project Results Framework ...............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRATIC UNITY PROSPERITY Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry POVERTY REDUCTION FUND PHASE III ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (January – December 2019) Suspended bridge, Luangphakham to Nongkham village, Long district, Luangnamtha province (January 2020) Nahaidiao Rd, P.O.Box 4625, Vientiane, Lao PRF Tel: (+856) 21 261479 -80 Fax: (+856) 21 261481, Website: www.prflaos.org January 2018 ABBREVIATIONS AWPB Annual Work Plan and Budget AFN Agriculture for Nutrition CD Community Development CDD Community Driven Development CF Community Facilitator CFA Community Force Account CLTS Community-Lead Total Sanitation DAFO District Agriculture and Forestry Office Deepen CDD Deepen Community Driven Development DPO District Planning Office DRM Disaster Risks Management DSEDP District Social Economic Development Plan EM Energy and Mine FRM Feedback and Resolution Mechanism FNG Farmer Nutrition Group GESI Gender Equity and Social Inclusion GOL Government of Lao GIS Geography information system GPAR Governance Public Administration Reform HH Household(s) HR Human Resource IE Internal Evaluation IEC Information, Education, Communication IGA Income Generating Activities IFAD International Fund for Agriculture Development IFR Interim Un-Audited Financial Report KBF Kum Ban Facilitator KDPs Kum Ban Development Plans KPIs Key Performance Indicators LAK Lao Kip (Lao Currency) LN Livelihood and Nutrition LWU Lao Women Union LYU Lao Youth Union M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MIS Management information system MNS Minutes
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Phuthai Textiles
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings Textile Society of America 2004 Contemporary Phuthai Textiles Linda S. McIntosh Simon Fraser University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf Part of the Art and Design Commons McIntosh, Linda S., "Contemporary Phuthai Textiles" (2004). Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. 481. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/481 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Textile Society of America at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Contemporary Phuthai Textiles Linda S. McIntosh Simon Fraser University [email protected] © Linda S. McIntosh 2004 The hand-woven textiles of the Phuthai ethnic group continue to represent Phuthai identity but also reflect exposure to foreign elements such as through trade and changes in the regional political power. If one asks a Phuthai woman what is Phuthai dress, she will answer, sin mii lae suea lap lai, or a skirt decorated with weft ikat technique and a fitted blouse of indigo dyed cotton, decorated with hand-woven, patterned red silk. Despite the use of synthetic dyes readily available in the local markets, many women still grow indigo and cotton, and indigo-stained hands and the repetitious sounds of weaving are still found in Phuthai villages. This paper focuses on the Phuthai living in Savannakhet Province, Laos, but they are also found in Khammuan, Bolikhamsay, and Salavan provinces of Laos as well as in Thailand and Vietnam.1 Contemporary refers to textile production in the last thirty years but particularly in the last ten years after the liberalization of the Lao government policies and the return of private business and tourism after the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Working for Health in the Lao People's Democratic Republic, 1962-2012
    YEARS Working for Health in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic 5 1962–2012 Fifty Years Working for Health in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic 1962–2012 WHO Library Cataloguing in the Publication Data Fifty years: working for health in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 1962-2012 1. Delivery of healthcare. 2. Health services. 3. Laos. 4. National health programs. 5. Primary health care. I. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. ISBN 978 92 9061 601 6 (NLM Classification: WA 530) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People's Democratic Republic
    Thematic Interpretation Plan Savannakhet Province Lao People’s Democratic Republic GMS-Sustainable Tourism Development Project in Lao PDR Lao National Tourism Administration Prepared by: Linda Susan McIntosh, PhD Candidate Thematic Interpretation and Textile Specialist 33 Soi 1 Sukhumvit Road Klongtoey-nua, Wattana What is Thematic Interpretation? Thematic Interpretation is the practice of verbal and non-verbal communication, using illustrated and non-illustrated techniques to present complex subject matter in an interesting and engaging way. One model of Thematic Interpretation is TORE™ = Thematic, Organized, Relevant, and Enjoyable “Successful interpretation provokes people to think. Their thinking creates meanings in their own minds. Themes can stay with us, even when we forget the smaller facts that support them. Strong themes stick in our minds, some of them forever”. Themes, because they are whole ideas, are expressed in the same form as information already stored in our minds. So when we communicate a theme effectively we give visitors something they can readily relate, self-appropriate, and incorporate into their thinking. Themes are ideas not topics: Examples of Themes: An Example of a Topic: • Birds are a fascinating group of animals • Birds because of their special adaptations for flight. • Native birds everywhere are in a fight for their lives because of overdevelopment and Having a theme helps us prepare educational and promotional materials. It makes our job a lot easier because with a theme we able to understand what to include and not include in a presentation to visitors. 2 SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL - Background The SAVANNAKHET HISTORIC TRAIL is a new tour circuit consisting of historic, cultural and natural attractions, situated along the East-West Corridor in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • LAO: Greater Mekong Subregion Corridor Towns Development Project
    Initial Environmental Examination July 2012 LAO: Greater Mekong Subregion Corridor Towns Development Project Prepared by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and Savannakhet Provincial Department of Natural Resources for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 August 2012) Currency Unit – kip (KN) KN1.00 = $0.00012 $1.00 = KN8,013 ABBREVIATIONS DBTZA – Dansavanh Border Trade Zone Authority DED – detailed engineering design DoF – Department of Forestry DPRA – Development Project Responsible Agency DPWT – District Public Works and Transport Office DNREO – District Natural Resource and Environment Office EA – environmental assessment EIA – environment impact assessment ECA – Environmental Compliance Audit ECC – Environmental Compliance Certificate ECO – Environmental Control Officer EMP – environment monitoring plan EMMU – Environment Management and Monitoring Unit ESD – Environment and Social Division ESIA – Environment and Social Impact Assessment ESO – environmental site officer EA – executing agency EWEC – East-West Economic Corridor FDI – foreign direct investment FGD – focus group discussion FS – Forest Strategy FYSEDP – Five Year Socio Economic Development Plan GDP – gross domestic product GMS – Greater Mekong Subregion GoL – Government of Lao PDR IA – implementing agency IEE – initial environmental examination IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature IWRM – Integrated Water Resource Management Lao PDR – Lao People’s Democratic Republic LFA – Land and Forest Allocation LWU – Lao Women Union
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Nurture Photo Credit: Jittinee Khienvichit, USAID Annual Report, Year 2: FY2017: October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017
    USAID Nurture Photo Credit: Jittinee Khienvichit, USAID Annual Report, Year 2: FY2017: October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 Cooperative Agreement Number: No. AID-486-A-16-00001 USAID/RDMA, Attn: Robin Martz, AOR Submitted by Kamden Hoffmann, Chief of Party, USAID Nurture [email protected] Contents Acronym List .......................................................................................................................................... iv Project Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 New and Existing Sub-Award Status ....................................................................................................... 6 Major Impacts and Accomplishments by Intermediate Result ............................................................... 8 Intermediate Result 1: Improved IYCF and WASH Behaviors ............................................................. 8 Intermediate Result 2: Improved use of quality nutrition and nutrition-sensitive WASH Services/Facilities .............................................................................................................................. 11 Community Service Delivery ......................................................................................................... 11 WASH Product Delivery................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (I) Towards Participatory Forest Management in Laos
    Towards Participatory Forest Management in Laos —Laos Country Report 2003— (i) (ii) Towards Participatory Forest Management in Laos —Laos Country Report 2003— Editor in chief HYAKUMURA Kimihiko and Editors INOUE Makoto Martinus Nanarg HARADA Kazuhiro KOMATSU Kiyoshi Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Kanagawa, Japan (iii) Published by Institute for Global Environmental Strategies 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Miura, Kanagawa, 240-0115, JAPAN Printed by Sato Printing Co. Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Cover (upper left) Local people and cardamom, Ngoi District, Luang Phabang Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Cover (upper right) Swidden land and paddy field, Nambak District, Luang Phabang Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Cover (lower left) Elephant and people, Nambak District, Luang Phabang Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Cover (lower right) Women carrying fuel wood, Pakeng District, Oudomxay Province. Photo credit: MORIMOTO Takashi Back Cover1 River in the morning, Phalanxai District, Savannakeht Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko. Back Cover2 Wild konjak potato and local people: Nambak District, Luang Phabang Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Back Cover3 Threshing the rice, Atsaphone District, Savannakhet Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Back Cover4 Ceremony in the spiritual forest, Atsaphone District, Savannakhet Province. Photo credit: HYAKUMURA Kimihiko Back Cover5 Fallow land and swidden land, Pakbeng District, Oudomxay Province, Photo credit: MORIMOTO Takashi All Right Reserved © 2004 The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Although every effort is made to ensure objectivity and balance, the printing of a book or translation does not imply IGES endorsement or acquiescence with its conclusions or the endorsement of IGES financers. IGES maintains a position of neutrality at all times on issues concerning public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Acleda Bank Branch in Laos
    ACLEDA BANK BRANCH IN LAOS NO. OFFICE NAME ADDRESS TEL / FAX / E-MAIL #372, Corner of Dongpalane and Dongpaina Te l: (856)-21 264 994/264 Road, Unit 21, Phonesavanh Neua Village, 998 Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Lao Fax: (856)-21 264 995 1 HEADQUARTERS PDR. E-mail: Website: www.acledabank.com.la [email protected] SWIFT Code: ACLBLALA m.la P.O. Box: 1555 #091, Nongborn Road, Unit 06, Nongchan Village, Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Tel : (856)-21 285 199 VIENTIANE Lao PDR. Fax: (856)-21 285 198 2 BRANCH Website: www.acledabank.com.la E-mail: SWIFT Code:ACLBLALA [email protected] P.O Box: 1555 Lao-Thai friendship road, unit 10, Saphanthong Nuea village, Sisattanak district, Tel : (856)-21 316 SAPHANTHONG Vientiane capital, Lao PDR. Fax: (856)-21 285 198 3 SERVICE UNIT Website: www.acledabank.com.la E-mail: SWIFT Code:ACLBLALA [email protected] P.O Box: 1555 # 415, Khamphengmeuang Road, Unit 30, Thatluang Tai Village, Xaysettha District, Te l: (856)-21 265 847, XAYSETTHA Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR. Fax: (856)-21 265 848 4 BRANCH Website: www.acledabank.com.la, E-mail: SWIFT Code: ACLBLALA [email protected] P.O Box: 1555 #118, Thongkhankham Road, Unit 09, Thongtoum Village, Chanthabouly District, Tel : (856)-21 254 124 CHANTHABOULY Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Fax : (856)-21 254 123 5 BRANCH Website: www.acledabank.com.la E-mail: SWIFT Code:ACLBLALA [email protected] P.O Box: 1555 #29, Phonetong-Dongdok Road, Unit 04, Saynamngeun village, Xaythany District, Tel : (856)-21 720 520 Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008
    Preliminary Gibbon Status Review for Lao PDR 2008 J.W. Duckworth December 2008 This work was carried out with funding from the Arcus Foundation. Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008 This review is a work in progress for the conservation of gibbons in Lao PDR. It is intended to be updated periodically. Any comment on this document, including further records, would be gratefully received by the author and by Fauna & Flora International, at the addresses below. Citation: J. W. Duckworth, 2008, Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008, Fauna & Flora International, Unpublished report. Author: J. W. Duckworth, PO Box 5773, Vientiane, Lao PDR Email: [email protected] Date: December 2008 For more information or to send further comments contact: Paul Insua-Cao Fauna & Flora Asia-Pacific Programme, 340 Nghi Tam, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84-(0)43-719 4117 Fax: +84-(0)43-719 4119 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo of a captive young yellow-cheeked crested gibbon by Monty Sly. All views expressed within are the author’s alone unless attributed otherwise and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Fauna & Flora International. While the authors and editors strive for rigour and accuracy in presenting this report, Fauna & Flora International make no representations as to completeness, suitability or validity of any information contained, and will not be liable for any errors or omissions. The editors and Fauna & Flora International take no responsibility for any misrepresentation of material resulting from translation of this report into any other language. Reproduction of any part of this report for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Education (Girls) Project
    Completion Report Project Number: 29288 Loan Number: 1621 July 2008 Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Basic Education (Girls) Project CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – kip (KN) At Appraisal At Project Completion 30 April 1998 31 July 2007 KN1.00 = $0.000419 $0.000104 $1.00 = KN2,383.50 KN9,550 ABBREVIATIONS CCED – committee for community education and development DEB – district education bureau DNFE – Department of Non-Formal Education EA – executing agency EMIS – education management information system EQIP – Education Quality Improvement Project GDP – gross domestic product GEMEU – Gender and Ethnic Minorities Education Unit Lao PDR – Lao People’s Democratic Republic MOE – Ministry of Education NGO – nongovernment organization NRIES – National Research Institute for Educational Science PES – provincial education service PWG – project working group RRP – report and recommendation of the President TA – technical assistance TTC – teacher training center NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2008 ends on 30 September 2008. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars Vice President C. Lawrence Greenwood, Jr. Operations 2 Director General A. Thapan, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Director G.H. Kim, Lao Resident Mission (LRM), SERD Team leader K. Chanthy, Senior Project Implementation Officer, LRM, SERD Team member S. Souannavong, Assistant Project Analyst, LRM, SERD iii CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. EVALUATION OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 2 A. Relevance of Design and Formulation 2 B. Project Outputs 4 C. Project Costs 7 D. Disbursements 7 E. Project Schedule 7 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Investments in Urban Water Supply 1999 – 2014
    68608 Public Disclosure Authorized Lao People’s Democratic Republic Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Review Public Disclosure Authorized Final dated December 15, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department East Asia and Pacific Region This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective September 13, 2010) Currency Unit = Lao Kip (LAK) LAK 1,000 = US$0.122 LAK 8,196.7 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR October 1 – September 30 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank NPNL Nampapa Nakhon Luang AFD Agence Française de NPSEs Nam Papa State Enterprises Developpement NRW Non revenue water BOT Build-Operate-Transfer NSEDP National Socio-Economic DHO District Health Office Development Plan DHUP Department of Housing and NT Nam Theun Urban Planning NUSDSIP National Urban Sector DPWT Department of Public Works Development Strategy and and Transportation Investment Plan GDP Gross Domestic Product O&M Operation and Maintenance GFS Gravity Fed System OBA Output-Based Aid GRET Group of Research and ODA Official Development Technological Exchange Assistance HH Households PM Decree Prime Minister Decree IMT Implementation and PPP Public-Private Partnership Maintenance Team PRF Poverty Reduction Fund IWG Infrastructure Working Group SNV Netherlands Development JICA
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Emergency Report Format
    We are responsive Lao PDR 2019 Flooding Emergency Response Report January 2020 Table of contents: 1. PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF DISASTER ............................................................................................. 5 3. NEED ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................. 6 4. COORDINATION MECHANISM......................................................................................... 6 5. RELIEF RESPONSE................................................................................................................ 6 6. EARLY RECOVERY PHASE ................................................................................................. 7 7. PROCUREMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD ......................................................... 8 8. BENEFICIARIES ACCOUNTABILITY ................................................................................ 8 9. POST MONITORING QUALITY ....................................................................................... 11 10. BUDGET FOR EXPENDING IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE .......................................... 11 11. ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................. 11 1. Project Summary Project Name Lao PDR Flooding Emergency Response 2019 213246 relief phase PBAS Project # 213441 early recovery phase Declaration
    [Show full text]