DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1812.09264V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 21 Dec 2018 [email protected] Orsodn Uhr .R Anderson R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1812.09264V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 21 Dec 2018 D.R.Anderson@Keele.Ac.Uk Orsodn Uhr .R Anderson R Draft version December 24, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 The discovery of WASP-134b, WASP-134c, WASP-137b, WASP-143b and WASP-146b: three hot Jupiters and a pair of warm Jupiters orbiting Solar-type stars D. R. Anderson,1 F. Bouchy,2 D.J.A. Brown,3,4 A. Collier Cameron,5 L. Delrez,6,7 M. Gillon,6 J. I.Gonzalez´ Hernandez´ ,8,9 C. Hellier,1 E. Jehin,6 M. Lendl,2,10 P. F. L. Maxted,1 M. Neveu-VanMalle,2 L. D. Nielsen,2 F. Pepe,2 M. Perger,11, 12 D. Pollacco,3,4 D. Queloz,2,7 J. Rey,2 D. S´egransan,2 B. Smalley,1 B. Toledo-Padron´ ,8,9 A.H.M.J.Triaud,13 O. D. Turner,2 S. Udry,2 and R.G. West3,4 1Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK 2Observatoire de Gen`eve, Universit´ede Gen`eve, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 3Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 4Centre for Exoplanets and Habitability, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 5SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, Fife KY16 9SS, UK 6Space sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, Universit´ede Li`ege, Li`ege 1, Belgium 7Cavendish Laboratory, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK 8Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 9Universidad de La Laguna, Departamento de Astrof´ısica, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 10Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria 11Institut de Ci`encies de l’Espai, Campus UAB, C/Can Magrans s/n, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 12Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain 13School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK ABSTRACT We report the discovery by WASP of five planets orbiting moderately bright (V = 11.0–12.9) Solar-type stars. WASP-137b, WASP-143b and WASP-146b are typical hot Jupiters in orbits of 3–4d and with masses in the range 0.68–1.11 M . WASP-134 is a metal-rich ([Fe/H] = +0.40 0.07]) G4 star orbited by two warm Jup ± Jupiters: WASP-134b (M = 1.41 M ; P = 10.1 d; e = 0.15 0.01; T = 950K) and WASP-134c (M sin i P Jup ± eql P = 0.70 M ; P = 70.0 d; e = 0.17 0.09; T = 500K). From observations of the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect Jup ± eql of WASP-134b, we find its orbit to be misaligned with the spin of its star (λ = 44 10 ). WASP-134 is a rare − ± ◦ example of a system with a short-period giant planet and a nearby giant companion. In-situ formation or disc migration seem more likely explanations for such systems than does high-eccentricity migration. Keywords: planets and satellites: individual (WASP-134b, WASP-134c, WASP-137b, WASP-143b, WASP- 146b) 1. INTRODUCTION observes only one or two transits, ephemerides may be re- As we near a tally of 200 planetsdiscoveredby ourground- covered by combining the TESS data with the long baseline based transit survey WASP (Pollacco et al. 2006), TESS is of the aforementioned surveys (Yao et al. 2018). Though each of those surveys is multi-site, even single-site obser- arXiv:1812.09264v1 [astro-ph.EP] 21 Dec 2018 ushering in the era of space-based wide-field transit surveys (Ricker et al. 2014). TESS will provide an important test vations would be effective in following up TESS’s single- of the completeness of WASP, as well as of similar surveys transit detections (Cooke et al. 2018). Thus ground-based such as KELT (Pepper et al. 2007), HATNet and HATSouth projects such as TRAPPIST (Gillon et al. 2011; Jehin et al. (Bakos 2018). 2011), NGTS (Wheatley et al. 2018) and SPECULOOS Considering that during its nominal mission TESS will (Delrez et al. 2018) stand to play an important role, as does observe most of its target fields for only 27 days, it faces a ESA’s CHEOPS satellite (Broeg et al. 2013), which is sched- challenge to discover planets with periods longer than half uled for launch in late 2019. that duration. For some of those planets for which TESS Warm Jupiters (orbital period P = 10–200d) are more diffi- cult to find than are hot Jupiters, due to their lower geometric transit probability, less frequent transits, and longer transit Corresponding author: D. R. Anderson durations. Also, they may be inherently less common (e.g. [email protected] Santerne et al. 2016). Considering only ‘Jupiters’ (planets 2 Anderson et al. 1.05 with mass MP > 0.3 MJup), the TEPCat database lists 416 hot Jupiters (P < 10d), but only 37 Jupiters in the range P = 1 10–20d (Southworth 2011). 0.95 ff Relative flux Longer-period planets are certainly worth the e ort re- 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 quired to find them: to gain an understanding of the diversity of exoplanets, their various formation and evolution histories, 1 bulk and atmospheric compositions, etc., we must populate a wide region of parameter space. Specifically, by measuring the orbital eccentricities and stellar obliquities of planets in 0.98 the tail end of the hot-Jupiter period distribution, where tides are weak, it may be that we can explain hot Jupiter migration 0.96 (e.g. Anderson et al. 2015a). Relative flux While it is common for a hot Jupiter to have a mas- sive companion in a wide orbit (e.g. Howard et al. 2012; 0.94 Neveu-VanMalle et al. 2016; Triaud et al. 2017), no hot Jupiters are known to have close companions (with the no- 0.92 table exception of WASP-47b; Hellier et al. 2012; Becker et al. 0.98 0.99 1 1.01 1.02 2015). Conversely, half of warm Jupiters are flanked by small companions, which Huang et al. (2016) interpreted as indi- −1 cating that warm Jupiters formed in situ. 50 We report here the discovery by the WASP survey of five planets orbiting Sun-like stars. In three systems we detect a single hot Jupiter and in the fourth system we detect two 0 warm Jupiters. We measure the orbital eccentricity of both warm Jupiters and the stellar obliquity of the inner planet. Relative radial velocity / m s −50 2. OBSERVATIONS 0.98 0.99 1 1.01 1.02 From periodic dimmings seen in their SuperWASP-North 150 and WASP-South lightcurves (Pollacco et al. 2006; top panel of Figs. 1 to 4), we identified each star as a candidate −1 100 host of a transiting planet using the techniques described in Collier Cameron et al. (2006, 2007). We conducted pho- 50 tometric and spectroscopic follow-up observations using var- ious facilities at the ESO La Silla observatory: the EulerCam 0 imager and the CORALIE spectrograph,both mountedon the −50 1.2-m Swiss Euler telescope (Lendl et al. 2012; Queloz et al. 2000), the 0.6-m TRAPPIST-South imager (Gillon et al. −100 2011; Jehin et al. 2011), and the HARPS-S spectrograph on Relative radial velocity / m s the 3.6-m ESO telescope (Pepe et al. 2002). We obtained ad- −150 ditional data using the HARPS-N spectrograph on the 3.6-m 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Telescopio Nazionale Galileo at the Observatorio del Roque Orbital phase de los Muchachos (Cosentino et al. 2012). We provide a summary of our observations in Table 1. Figure 1. WASP-134b discovery data. Top panel: WASP lightcurve folded on the transit ephemeris and binned with a bin width of We obtained lightcurves from the time-series images using 10 min. Second panel: Transit lightcurves from WASP (grey), standard differential aperture photometry (second panel of TRAPPIST-South (green) and EulerCam (blue), offset for clarity, Figs. 1 to 4). We computed radial-velocity (RV) measure- binned with a bin width of 2 min (10 min for WASP), and plotted ments from the CORALIE and HARPS spectra by weighted chronologically with the most recent lightcurve at the bottom. The cross-correlation with a G2 binary mask (Baranne et al. best-fitting transit model is superimposed. Third panel: The RVs 1996; Pepe et al. 2002). We detected sinusoidal variations in from HARPS-S (brown) and HARPS-N (green) showing the ap- the RVs with semi-amplitudes consistent with planetary mass parent anomaly during transit, along with the best-fitting Rossiter- McLaughlin (RM) effect model. Bottom panel: The RVs from companions and that phase with the WASP ephemerides CORALIE (blue), HARPS-S and HARPS-N, with the best-fitting (bottom panel of Figs. 1 to 4). The lack of correlation be- eccentric orbital model. WASP-134 reached high airmass by the end of each photometric and spectroscopic transit sequence. A low-density hot Jupiter in a near-aligned orbit 3 Table 1. Summary of observations 1.05 a b 1 Facility Date Nobs Notes WASP-134 0.95 Relative flux WASP 2008 Jun–2010 Oct 28 614 400–700 nm 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 TRAPPIST-South 2014 Sep 05 678 I + z 1.02 TRAPPIST-South 2014 Oct 26 284 I + z Euler/EulerCam 2016 Sep 25 338 NGTS filter 1 Euler/CORALIE 2014 Jul–2018 Oct 33 orbit ESO3.6/HARPS-S 2015 Jun–2015 Aug 10 orbit ESO3.6/HARPS-S 2015 Aug 16 17 transit 0.98 TNG/HARPS-N 2018 Aug 16 47 transit WASP-137 0.96 WASP 2008 Jul–2010 Dec 17 463 400–700 nm TRAPPIST-South 2014 Nov 10 577 I + z Relative flux 0.94 Euler/EulerCam 2014 Nov 14 303 Gunn r TRAPPIST-South 2014 Dec 27 709 I + z 0.92 TRAPPIST-South 2015 Sep 03 982 I + z; MF Euler/CORALIE 2014 Sep–2017 Jan 32 orbit WASP-143 0.9 WASP 2009 Jan–2012 Apr 32 995 400–700 nm 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 TRAPPIST-South 2015 Jan 31 767 blue-blocking 100 Euler/EulerCam 2015 Feb 15 199 NGTS filter Euler/EulerCam 2015 Mar 06 178 NGTS filter −1 TRAPPIST-South 2016 Feb 09 843 blue-blocking; MF 50 Euler/CORALIE 2014 Feb–2017 May 22 orbit WASP-146 WASP 2008 Jun–2011 Nov 54 839 400–700 nm 0 Euler/EulerCam 2014 Nov 18 190 NGTS filter TRAPPIST-South 2014 Nov 18 791 blue-blocking Euler/EulerCam 2015 Jul 17 150 NGTS filter −50 TRAPPIST-South 2015 Jul 17 874 blue-blocking; MF Euler/CORALIE 2014 Jul–2016 Oct 16 orbit Relative radial velocity / m s a The dates are ‘night beginning’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Hot Subdwarf-White Dwarf Super-Chandrasekhar Candidate
    A hot subdwarf–white dwarf super-Chandrasekhar candidate supernova Ia progenitor Ingrid Pelisoli1,2*, P. Neunteufel3, S. Geier1, T. Kupfer4,5, U. Heber6, A. Irrgang6, D. Schneider6, A. Bastian1, J. van Roestel7, V. Schaffenroth1, and B. N. Barlow8 1Institut fur¨ Physik und Astronomie, Universitat¨ Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany 2Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK 3Max Planck Institut fur¨ Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85748 Garching bei Munchen¨ 4Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 5Texas Tech University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Box 41051, 79409, Lubbock, TX, USA 6Dr. Karl Remeis-Observatory & ECAP, Astronomical Institute, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany 7Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, USA *[email protected] ABSTRACT Supernova Ia are bright explosive events that can be used to estimate cosmological distances, allowing us to study the expansion of the Universe. They are understood to result from a thermonuclear detonation in a white dwarf that formed from the exhausted core of a star more massive than the Sun. However, the possible progenitor channels leading to an explosion are a long-standing debate, limiting the precision and accuracy of supernova Ia as distance indicators. Here we present HD 265435, a binary system with an orbital period of less than a hundred minutes, consisting of a white dwarf and a hot subdwarf — a stripped core-helium burning star.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extragalactic Distance Scale
    The Extragalactic Distance Scale Published in "Stellar astrophysics for the local group" : VIII Canary Islands Winter School of Astrophysics. Edited by A. Aparicio, A. Herrero, and F. Sanchez. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1998 Calibration of the Extragalactic Distance Scale By BARRY F. MADORE1, WENDY L. FREEDMAN2 1NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, Infrared Processing & Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Observatories, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena CA 91101, USA The calibration and use of Cepheids as primary distance indicators is reviewed in the context of the extragalactic distance scale. Comparison is made with the independently calibrated Population II distance scale and found to be consistent at the 10% level. The combined use of ground-based facilities and the Hubble Space Telescope now allow for the application of the Cepheid Period-Luminosity relation out to distances in excess of 20 Mpc. Calibration of secondary distance indicators and the direct determination of distances to galaxies in the field as well as in the Virgo and Fornax clusters allows for multiple paths to the determination of the absolute rate of the expansion of the Universe parameterized by the Hubble constant. At this point in the reduction and analysis of Key Project galaxies H0 = 72km/ sec/Mpc ± 2 (random) ± 12 [systematic]. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE LECTURES CEPHEIDS BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE OBSERVED PROPERTIES OF CEPHEID
    [Show full text]
  • Not Surprising That the Method Begins to Break Down at This Point
    152 ASTRONOMY: W. S. ADAMS hanced lines in the early F stars are normally so prominent that it is not surprising that the method begins to break down at this point. To illustrate the use of the formulae and curves we may select as il- lustrations a few stars of different spectral types and magnitudes. These are collected in Table II. The classification is from Mount Wilson determinations. TABLE H ~A M PARAIuAX srTATYP_________________ (a) I(b) (C) (a) (b) c) Mean Comp. Ob. Pi 10U96.... 7.6F5 -0.7 +0.7 +3.0 +6.5 4.7 5.8 5.7 +0#04 +0.04 Sun........ GO -0.5 +0.5 +3.0 +5.6 4.3 5.8 5.2 Lal. 38287.. 7.2 G5 -1.8 +1.5 +3.5 +7.4 +6.3 +6.2 7.3 +0.10 +0.09 a Arietis... 2.2K0O +2.5 -2.4 +0.2 +1.0 1.3 +0.2 0.8 +0.05 +0.09 aTauri.... 1.1K5 +3.0 -2.0 +0.5 -0.4 +1.9 +0.5 0.7 +0.08 +0.07 61' Cygni...6.3K8 -1.8 +5.8 +7.7 +8.2 9.3 8.9 8.8 +0.32 +0.31 Groom. 34..8.2 Ma -2.2 +6.8 +9.2 +10.2 10.5 10.4 10.4 +0.28 +0.28 The parallaxes are computed from the absolute magnitudes by the formula, to which reference has already been made, 5 logr = M - m - 5. The results are given in the next to the last column of the table, and the measured parallaxes in the final column.
    [Show full text]
  • Milan Dimitrijevic Avgust.Qxd
    1. M. Platiša, M. Popović, M. Dimitrijević, N. Konjević: 1975, Z. Fur Natur- forsch. 30a, 212 [A 1].* 1. Griem, H. R.: 1975, Stark Broadening, Adv. Atom. Molec. Phys. 11, 331. 2. Platiša, M., Popović, M. V., Konjević, N.: 1975, Stark broadening of O II and O III lines, Astron. Astrophys. 45, 325. 3. Konjević, N., Wiese, W. L.: 1976, Experimental Stark widths and shifts for non-hydrogenic spectral lines of ionized atoms, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 5, 259. 4. Hey, J. D.: 1977, On the Stark broadening of isolated lines of F (II) and Cl (III) by plasmas, JQSRT 18, 649. 5. Hey, J. D.: 1977, Estimates of Stark broadening of some Ar III and Ar IV lines, JQSRT 17, 729. 6. Hey, J. D.: Breger, P.: 1980, Stark broadening of isolated lines emitted by singly - ionized tin, JQSRT 23, 311. 7. Hey, J. D.: Breger, P.: 1981, Stark broadening of isolated ion lines by plas- mas: Application of theory, in Spectral Line Shapes I, ed. B. Wende, W. de Gruyter, 201. 8. Сыркин, М. И.: 1981, Расчеты электронного уширения спектральных линий в теории оптических свойств плазмы, Опт. Спектроск. 51, 778. 9. Wiese, W. L., Konjević, N.: 1982, Regularities and similarities in plasma broadened spectral line widths (Stark widths), JQSRT 28, 185. 10. Konjević, N., Pittman, T. P.: 1986, Stark broadening of spectral lines of ho- mologous, doubly ionized inert gases, JQSRT 35, 473. 11. Konjević, N., Pittman, T. P.: 1987, Stark broadening of spectral lines of ho- mologous, doubly - ionized inert gases, JQSRT 37, 311. 12. Бабин, С.
    [Show full text]
  • Jason A. Dittmann 51 Pegasi B Postdoctoral Fellow
    Jason A. Dittmann 51 Pegasi b Postdoctoral Fellow Contact Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT Kavli Institute: 37-438f 617-258-5928 (office) 70 Vassar St. 520-820-0928 (cell) Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] Education Harvard University, Cambridge, MA PhD, Astronomy and Astrophysics, May 2016 Advisor: David Charbonneau, PhD • University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ BS, Astronomy, Physics, May 2010 Advisor: Laird Close, PhD • Recent 51 Pegasi b Postdoctoral Fellow July 2017 – Present Research Earth and Planetary Science Department, MIT Positions Faculty Contact: Sara Seager Postdoctoral Researcher Feb 2017 – June 2017 Kavli Institute, MIT Supervisor: Sarah Ballard Postdoctoral Researcher July 2016 – Jan 2017 Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University Supervisor: David Charbonneau Research Assistant Sep 2010 – May 2016 Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University Advisors: David Charbonneau Publication 16 first and second authored publications Summary 22 additional co-authored publications 1 first-authored publication in Nature 1 co-authored publication in Nature Selected 51 Pegasi b Postdoctoral Fellowship 2017 – Present Awards and Pierce Fellowship 2010 – 2013 Honors Certificate of Distinction in Teaching 2012 Best Project Award, Physics Ugrd. Research Symp. 2009 Best Undergraduate Research (Steward Observatory) 2009 – 2010 Grants Principal Investigator, Hubble Space Telescope 2017, 10 orbits Awarded “Initial Reconaissance of a Transiting Rocky (maximum award) Planet in a Nearby M-Dwarf’s Habitable Zone” Principal Investigator,
    [Show full text]
  • Stars and Their Spectra: an Introduction to the Spectral Sequence Second Edition James B
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89954-3 - Stars and Their Spectra: An Introduction to the Spectral Sequence Second Edition James B. Kaler Index More information Star index Stars are arranged by the Latin genitive of their constellation of residence, with other star names interspersed alphabetically. Within a constellation, Bayer Greek letters are given first, followed by Roman letters, Flamsteed numbers, variable stars arranged in traditional order (see Section 1.11), and then other names that take on genitive form. Stellar spectra are indicated by an asterisk. The best-known proper names have priority over their Greek-letter names. Spectra of the Sun and of nebulae are included as well. Abell 21 nucleus, see a Aurigae, see Capella Abell 78 nucleus, 327* ε Aurigae, 178, 186 Achernar, 9, 243, 264, 274 z Aurigae, 177, 186 Acrux, see Alpha Crucis Z Aurigae, 186, 269* Adhara, see Epsilon Canis Majoris AB Aurigae, 255 Albireo, 26 Alcor, 26, 177, 241, 243, 272* Barnard’s Star, 129–130, 131 Aldebaran, 9, 27, 80*, 163, 165 Betelgeuse, 2, 9, 16, 18, 20, 73, 74*, 79, Algol, 20, 26, 176–177, 271*, 333, 366 80*, 88, 104–105, 106*, 110*, 113, Altair, 9, 236, 241, 250 115, 118, 122, 187, 216, 264 a Andromedae, 273, 273* image of, 114 b Andromedae, 164 BDþ284211, 285* g Andromedae, 26 Bl 253* u Andromedae A, 218* a Boo¨tis, see Arcturus u Andromedae B, 109* g Boo¨tis, 243 Z Andromedae, 337 Z Boo¨tis, 185 Antares, 10, 73, 104–105, 113, 115, 118, l Boo¨tis, 254, 280, 314 122, 174* s Boo¨tis, 218* 53 Aquarii A, 195 53 Aquarii B, 195 T Camelopardalis,
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report
    IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report Eric Mamajek (chair, USA) WG Members: Juan Antonio Belmote Avilés (Spain), Sze-leung Cheung (Thailand), Beatriz García (Argentina), Steven Gullberg (USA), Duane Hamacher (Australia), Susanne M. Hoffmann (Germany), Alejandro López (Argentina), Javier Mejuto (Honduras), Thierry Montmerle (France), Jay Pasachoff (USA), Ian Ridpath (UK), Clive Ruggles (UK), B.S. Shylaja (India), Robert van Gent (Netherlands), Hitoshi Yamaoka (Japan) WG Associates: Danielle Adams (USA), Yunli Shi (China), Doris Vickers (Austria) WGSN Website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/ ​ WGSN Email: [email protected] ​ The Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) consists of an international group of astronomers with expertise in stellar astronomy, astronomical history, and cultural astronomy who research and catalog proper names for stars for use by the international astronomical community, and also to aid the recognition and preservation of intangible astronomical heritage. The Terms of Reference and membership for WG Star Names (WGSN) are provided at the IAU website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/. ​ ​ ​ WGSN was re-proposed to Division C and was approved in April 2019 as a functional WG whose scope extends beyond the normal 3-year cycle of IAU working groups. The WGSN was specifically called out on p. 22 of IAU Strategic Plan 2020-2030: “The IAU serves as the ​ internationally recognised authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and their surface features. To do so, the IAU has a number of Working Groups on various topics, most notably on the nomenclature of small bodies in the Solar System and planetary systems under Division F and on Star Names under Division C.” WGSN continues its long term activity of researching cultural astronomy literature for star names, and researching etymologies with the goal of adding this information to the WGSN’s online materials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Planets
    The Fate of Planets Eva Villaver Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Dpto. Física Teórica, Módulo 15, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. As a star evolves off the Main Sequence, it endures major structural changes that are capable of determining the fate of the planets orbiting it. Throughout its evolution along the Red Giant Branch, the star increases its radius by two orders of magnitude. Later, during the Asymptotic Giant Branch, it loses most of its initial mass. Finally, during the Planetary Nebulae phase, it emits intense radiation before ultimately beginning its fade as a white dwarf. We show how the several competing processes (stellar mass-loss, gravitational and frictional drag, tidal forces, planet accretion and evaporation) affect the survival of planets around evolved stars. Keywords: Planets, Evolved Stars, Giant and White Dwarf stars PACS: 97.82.j, 97.10.Me, 97.20.Li PLANET'S FATE BEYOND THE MAIN SEQUENCE The Red Giant Branch Phase Once the nuclear burning has been exhausted in the core, low- and intermediate mass stars evolve into the Red Giant Branch (RGB) phase. During the RGB, hydrogen burning continues in a shell outside the helium core, which now, devoid of energy sources, is contracting and heating up. The stellar evolution timescales (in the absence of significant mass loss) are set by the rate of consumption of the nuclear fuel. As the core contracts the envelope expands and cools. The stellar effective temperature decreases while the star’s radius and luminosity increase. There are several competing processes that affect the orbital distance between the star and the planet as the star evolves off the Main Sequence (MS): the changes in the mass of both the planet and the star (M˙p and M˙∗ respectively), the gravitational and frictional drag (Fg and Ff ), and the tidal force.
    [Show full text]
  • GTO Keypad Manual, V5.001
    ASTRO-PHYSICS GTO KEYPAD Version v5.xxx Please read the manual even if you are familiar with previous keypad versions Flash RAM Updates Keypad Java updates can be accomplished through the Internet. Check our web site www.astro-physics.com/software-updates/ November 11, 2020 ASTRO-PHYSICS KEYPAD MANUAL FOR MACH2GTO Version 5.xxx November 11, 2020 ABOUT THIS MANUAL 4 REQUIREMENTS 5 What Mount Control Box Do I Need? 5 Can I Upgrade My Present Keypad? 5 GTO KEYPAD 6 Layout and Buttons of the Keypad 6 Vacuum Fluorescent Display 6 N-S-E-W Directional Buttons 6 STOP Button 6 <PREV and NEXT> Buttons 7 Number Buttons 7 GOTO Button 7 ± Button 7 MENU / ESC Button 7 RECAL and NEXT> Buttons Pressed Simultaneously 7 ENT Button 7 Retractable Hanger 7 Keypad Protector 8 Keypad Care and Warranty 8 Warranty 8 Keypad Battery for 512K Memory Boards 8 Cleaning Red Keypad Display 8 Temperature Ratings 8 Environmental Recommendation 8 GETTING STARTED – DO THIS AT HOME, IF POSSIBLE 9 Set Up your Mount and Cable Connections 9 Gather Basic Information 9 Enter Your Location, Time and Date 9 Set Up Your Mount in the Field 10 Polar Alignment 10 Mach2GTO Daytime Alignment Routine 10 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR NEW SETUPS OR SETUP IN NEW LOCATION 11 Assemble Your Mount 11 Startup Sequence 11 Location 11 Select Existing Location 11 Set Up New Location 11 Date and Time 12 Additional Information 12 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR MOUNTS USED AT THE SAME LOCATION WITHOUT A COMPUTER 13 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR COMPUTER CONTROLLED MOUNTS 14 1 OBJECTS MENU – HAVE SOME FUN!
    [Show full text]
  • Planets and Exoplanets
    NASE Publications Planets and exoplanets Planets and exoplanets Rosa M. Ros, Hans Deeg International Astronomical Union, Technical University of Catalonia (Spain), Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias and University of La Laguna (Spain) Summary This workshop provides a series of activities to compare the many observed properties (such as size, distances, orbital speeds and escape velocities) of the planets in our Solar System. Each section provides context to various planetary data tables by providing demonstrations or calculations to contrast the properties of the planets, giving the students a concrete sense for what the data mean. At present, several methods are used to find exoplanets, more or less indirectly. It has been possible to detect nearly 4000 planets, and about 500 systems with multiple planets. Objetives - Understand what the numerical values in the Solar Sytem summary data table mean. - Understand the main characteristics of extrasolar planetary systems by comparing their properties to the orbital system of Jupiter and its Galilean satellites. The Solar System By creating scale models of the Solar System, the students will compare the different planetary parameters. To perform these activities, we will use the data in Table 1. Planets Diameter (km) Distance to Sun (km) Sun 1 392 000 Mercury 4 878 57.9 106 Venus 12 180 108.3 106 Earth 12 756 149.7 106 Marte 6 760 228.1 106 Jupiter 142 800 778.7 106 Saturn 120 000 1 430.1 106 Uranus 50 000 2 876.5 106 Neptune 49 000 4 506.6 106 Table 1: Data of the Solar System bodies In all cases, the main goal of the model is to make the data understandable.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report / Rapport Annuel / Jahresbericht 1996
    Annual Report / Rapport annuel / Jahresbericht 1996 ✦ ✦ ✦ E U R O P E A N S O U T H E R N O B S E R V A T O R Y ES O✦ 99 COVER COUVERTURE UMSCHLAG Beta Pictoris, as observed in scattered light Beta Pictoris, observée en lumière diffusée Beta Pictoris, im Streulicht bei 1,25 µm (J- at 1.25 microns (J band) with the ESO à 1,25 microns (bande J) avec le système Band) beobachtet mit dem adaptiven opti- ADONIS adaptive optics system at the 3.6-m d’optique adaptative de l’ESO, ADONIS, au schen System ADONIS am ESO-3,6-m-Tele- telescope and the Observatoire de Grenoble télescope de 3,60 m et le coronographe de skop und dem Koronographen des Obser- coronograph. l’observatoire de Grenoble. vatoriums von Grenoble. The combination of high angular resolution La combinaison de haute résolution angu- Die Kombination von hoher Winkelauflö- (0.12 arcsec) and high dynamical range laire (0,12 arcsec) et de gamme dynamique sung (0,12 Bogensekunden) und hohem dy- (105) allows to image the disk to only 24 AU élevée (105) permet de reproduire le disque namischen Bereich (105) erlaubt es, die from the star. Inside 50 AU, the main plane jusqu’à seulement 24 UA de l’étoile. A Scheibe bis zu einem Abstand von nur 24 AE of the disk is inclined with respect to the l’intérieur de 50 UA, le plan principal du vom Stern abzubilden. Innerhalb von 50 AE outer part. Observers: J.-L. Beuzit, A.-M.
    [Show full text]