DOCSLIB.ORG

Additional 100+ Ships Move Into Philippine EEZ Since May, Bringing Total to 238

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Additional 100+ Ships Move Into Philippine EEZ Since May, Bringing Total to 238 Additional 100+ Ships Move Into Philippine EEZ Since May, Bringing Total To 238 Analysis By Simularity June 20, 2021 © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Tracking Likely Chinese Ships In The Contested Spratlys 250 Between mid-May and mid-June 2021, The number of ships within 200 the Union Banks increased from 9 to 236 and the number of ships 150 near Gaven Reef in Tizard Bank decreased Whitsun Union Banks from 234 to 71. 100 Gaven The number of ships in the Philippine EEZ 50 increased from 129 to 238, an increase of more than 100 ships. 0 March April May June © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved June 17, 2021 Thitu Reef: 11 Ships Thitu (Pag- Asa) Island As of June 17, 2021, Outside PHL EEZ approximately 238 ships are in the Demarcation of the Philippine EEZ Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Tizard Bank: 71 Ships Gaven Reef Inside PHL EEZ Whitsun Reef Hughes Reef Union Banks: Imagery credit: European Space 236 Ships Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing Johnson data Reef © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Union Banks Areas With Ships June 17, 2021 1 Union Banks Is 2 Located Entirely Within The Philippine EEZ Area 1 – 11 Area 2 – 144 Area 3 – 19 Area 4 – 19 Area 5 – 43 5 Total Ships In Union Banks: 236 Imagery credit: EuropeanImagery Space credit: Agency European – produced Space Agency from ESA – produced remote sensing from ESA data remote sensing data © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Union Banks Area 1-11 ships June 17, 2021 7 1 Detail 3 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Union Banks Area 2 – 144 Ships June 17, 2021 29 5 19 44 42 3 Detail 2 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved ESA remote sensing data Union Banks Area 3 – 19 Ships 8 June 17, 2021 8 3 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced Detail from ESA remote sensing data © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Union Banks Area 4 – 19 Ships 1 June 17, 2021 5 4 Detail 7 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data 2 © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Union Banks Area 5 – 43 Ships 7 June 17, 2021 7 Detail 29 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced Detail from ESA remote sensing data © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Tizard Banks Area With Ships Philippine EEZ Demarcation June 17, 2021 Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Tizard Bank Area – 71 Ships June 17, 2021 17 17 1 17 2 1 16 Detail Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data Philippine EEZ © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Demarcation 11 Ships At Thitu Reef June 17, 2021 Thitu Reef Ship Count 40 30 20 10 Ship Count 0 June 17, 2021 Thitu (Pag-Asa) Island 11 © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data Simularity’s monitoring process Simularity is a software company that uses AI and Geospatial data to determine when significant changes have happened to an area. Our software, Automated Image Anomaly Detection System (AIADS), enables us to automate the scanning of large areas, such as the South China Sea, for unusual activity. Our South China Sea monitoring project helps us demonstrate the value of our software. We check for new Sentinel 2 imagery of the South China Sea every week. When new images arrive, they are automatically downloaded Imagery credit: European Space Agency – produced from ESA remote sensing data and analyzed by AIADS. This anomaly heat map was generated by AIADS. It is shown A human analyst then reviews the results of the overlaid onto a European Space Agency Sentinel 2 image. The AIADS analysis, an “anomaly heat map” that anomalies are the red squares. After reviewing the imagery, our highlights significant changes in red. By looking analyst then drew the pink polygons around the areas that need at the new image, the anomaly heat map, further investigation. and historical images, our human analyst determines where there are changes that High resolution imagery was obtained for these areas, and deserve a closer look. Those are indicated in Allsource Analysis helped interpret what those high resolution this report with the red polygons. images revealed. Running AIADS on free Sentinel 2 imagery makes it possible for us to inexpensively monitor a very large area. Please contact us at [email protected] to © Copyrightchat 2021 Simularity. about All Rights your Reserved monitoring project. Republish Permissions Republish Rights are given to all accredited news agencies as follows: • Any cropped images from the report can be published with the condition that image credits associated with the images are also published • Entire pages/slides from the report can be published as is • Credit for the entire report must be given to Simularity Inc. For further questions, interview requests, or exclusive report projects please contact [email protected] © Copyright 2021 Simularity. All Rights Reserved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Position Paper on ROC South China Sea Policy
    Position Paper on ROC South China Sea Policy Republic of China (Taiwan) March 21, 2016 1. Preface The Nansha (Spratly) Islands, Shisha (Paracel) Islands, Chungsha (Macclesfield Bank) Islands, and Tungsha (Pratas) Islands (together known as the South China Sea Islands) were first discovered, named, and used by the ancient Chinese, and incorporated into national territory and administered by imperial Chinese governments. Whether from the perspective of history, geography, or international law, the South China Sea Islands and their surrounding waters are an inherent part of ROC territory and waters. The ROC enjoys all rights over them in accordance with international law. This is indisputable. Any claim to sovereignty over, or occupation of, these areas by other countries is illegal, irrespective of the reasons put forward or methods used, and the ROC government recognizes no such claim or occupation. With respect to international disputes regarding the South China Sea, the ROC has consistently maintained the principles of safeguarding sovereignty, shelving disputes, pursuing peace and reciprocity, and promoting joint development, and in accordance with the United Nations Charter and international law, called for consultations with other countries, participation in related dialogue and cooperative mechanisms, and peaceful 1 resolution of disputes, to jointly ensure regional peace. 2. Grounds for the ROC position History The early Chinese have been active in the South China Sea since ancient times. Historical texts and local gazetteers contain numerous references to the geographical position, geology, natural resources of the South China Sea waters and landforms, as well as the activities of the ancient Chinese in the region. The South China Sea Islands were discovered, named, used over the long term, and incorporated into national territory by the early Chinese, so even though most of the islands and reefs are uninhabited, they are not terra nullius.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-09-13 "Since Time Immemorial": China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea Chung, Chris Pak Cheong Chung, C. P. (2013). "Since Time Immemorial": China's Historical Claim in the South China Sea (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27791 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/955 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY “Since Time Immemorial”: China’s Historical Claim in the South China Sea by Chris P.C. Chung A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2013 © Chris Chung 2013 Abstract Four archipelagos in the South China Sea are territorially disputed: the Paracel, Spratly, and Pratas Islands, and Macclesfield Bank. The People’s Republic of China and Republic of China’s claims are embodied by a nine-dashed U-shaped boundary line originally drawn in an official Chinese map in 1948, which encompasses most of the South China Sea. Neither side has clarified what the line represents. Using ancient Chinese maps and texts, archival documents, relevant treaties, declarations, and laws, this thesis will conclude that it is best characterized as an islands attribution line, which centres the claim simply on the islands and features themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Claim of Sovereignty Over Spratly and Paracel Islands: a Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 23 | Issue 3 1991 China's Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Teh-Kuang Chang, China's Claim of Sovereignty over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective, 23 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 399 (1991) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol23/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. China's Claim of Sovereignty Over Spratly and Paracel Islands: A Historical and Legal Perspective Teh-Kuang Chang* I. INTRODUCTION (Dn August 13, 1990, in Singapore, Premier Li Peng of the People's Re- public of China (the PRC) reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Xisha and Nansha Islands.1 On December. 29, 1990, in Taipei, Foreign Minis- ter Frederick Chien stated that the Nansha Islands are territory of the Republic of China.2 Both statements indicated that China's claim to sov- ereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands was contrary to the claims of other nations. Since China's claim of Spratly and Paracel Islands is challenged by its neighboring countries, the ownership of the islands in the South China Sea is an unsettled international dispute.3 An understanding of both * Professor of Political Science, Ball State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Are China's Maritime Militia Ships At
    Exposed! Here are China’s Maritime Militia Ships at Whitsun Reef By Andrew S. Erickson and Ryan D. Martinson Erickson is a Professor of Strategy in the Naval War College’s China Maritime Studies Institute and a visiting scholar at Harvard’s John King Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies. Martinson is a researcher in the China Maritime Studies Institute at the Naval War College. 29 March 2021 The views expressed here are those of the authors alone. The are based solely on analysis of publicly-available open sources. They do not represent the policies or estimates of the U.S. Navy, the U.S. government, or any other organization with which they are associated. Geography • Jiangmen (江门市) is a City in Guangdong (pop. 4.5 million) • Taishan City (台山市, pop. 941,000) is administered by Jiangmen Taishan Shadi Bay By Andrew S. Erickson and Ryan D. Martinson The “Fancheng Nine” Trawlers # Name MMSI # Length (m) Power (kW) 1 Yuetaiyu 18000 412472778 62.8 1,224 2 Yuetaiyu 18111 412472779 62.8 1,224 3 Yuetaiyu 18222 412472781 62.8 1,224 4 Yuetaiyu 18333 412472782 62.8 1,224 5 Yuetaiyu 18555 412472783 62.8 1,224 6 Yuetaiyu 18666 412472884 62.8 1,224 7 Yuetaiyu 18777 412472885 62.8 1,224 8 Yuetaiyu 18888 412472883 62.8 1,224 9 Yuetaiyu 18999 412472882 62.8 1,224 Yuetaiyu 18999 For image of Yuetaiyu 18999, see http://www.gshi.cn/news_view.asp?id=338 By Andrew S. Erickson and Ryan D. Martinson The “Fancheng Nine” Trawlers March 15, 2017: Fancheng Fisheries and Guangxin Shipbuilding sign contract for nine “backbone” Spratly boats Yuetaiyu 18000 undergoes sea trials (October 2017) Sources: http://www.gshi.cn/news_view.asp?id=276 http://www.gshi.cn/news_view.asp?id=323 By Andrew S.
    [Show full text]
  • China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
    A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines Against China: Arguments Concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Xiamen University Institutional Repository 322 China Oceans Law Review (Vol. 2015 No. 1) The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines against China: Arguments concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands Yann-huei SONG* Abstract: On March 30, 2014, the Philippines submitted its Memorial to the Arbitral Tribunal, which presents the country’s case on the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the merits of its claims. In the Memorial, the Philippines argues that Mischief Reef, Second Thomas Shoal, Subi Reef, Gaven Reef, McKennan Reef, Hughes Reef are low-tide elevations, and that Scarborough Shoal, Johnson Reef, Cuarteron Reef, and Fiery Cross Reef are “rocks”, therefore these land features cannot generate entitlement to a 200-nautical-mile EEZ or continental shelf. This paper discusses if the claims made by the Philippines are well founded in fact and law. It concludes that it would be difficult for the Tribunal to rule in favor of the Philippines’ claims. Key Words: Arbitration; South China Sea; China; The Philippines; Low tide elevation; Island; Rock; UNCLOS I. Introduction On January 22, 2013, the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter “the Philippines”) initiated arbitral proceedings against the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter “China” or “PRC”) when it presented a Note Verbale1 to the Chinese * Yann-huie Song, Professor, Institute of Marine Affairs, College of Marine Sciences, Sun- yet Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan and Research Fellow, Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Spratly Islands Administered by the Individual States of the Region and the Boundaries of Claims Versus the Exclusive Econom
    The Spratly Islands administered by the individual states of the region and the boundaries of claims versus the exclusive economic zones and the boundaries of the continental shelf 0 25 50 75 100 km 0 25 50 75 100 NM 2009 VIETNAM 1974 Northeast Cay Southwest Cay Block Claim Vietnam Petroleum South Reef West York Island Thitu Island Subi Reef Irving Reef Flat Island Loaita Cay Nanshan Island Lankiam Cay Loaita Island a e Centre Cay Petley Reef S Itu Aba Island Sand Cay Gaven Reef a Namyit Island n i Discovery Great Reef 1979 Hughes Reef Mischief Reef h Sin Cowe Island C (Union Banks) Grierson Reef Collins Reef Higgens Reef Second Lansdowne Reef Thomas Shoal h Johnson South Reef t u Fiery Cross Reef First o Bombay Castle S Thomas Shoal 2009 2009 (London Reefs) PHILIPPINES Central Reef Pearson Reef Pigeon Reef 1979 West Reef Cuarteron Reef East Reef Alison Reef Ladd Reef Cornwallis South Reef Spratly Island Commodore Reef Prince of Wales Bank Barque Canada Reef Erica Reef Investigator Shoal Alexandra Bank Mariveles Reef Prince Consort Bank Amboyna Cay Grainger Bank Rifleman Bank Ardasier Reef Vanguard Bank Swallow Reef 1979 1979 The boundaries of the claims in the South China Sea have not been precisely delimited. This is their approximate location, presented for illustrative purposes only. for illustrative location, presented delimited. This is their approximate precisely not been Sea have the claims in the South China The boundaries of : MALAYSIA © / Reservation LEGEND Areas of land (islands, cays, reefs, rocks): Submerged areas and areas only partly above water: Boundaries of claims submitted by: Boundaries of the exclusive economic zones delimited pursuant to the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague issued in 2016 (case number 2013–19) and in line with the UNCLOS, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas
    Maritime Issues in the East and South China Seas Summary of a Conference Held January 12–13, 2016 Volume Editors: Rafiq Dossani, Scott Warren Harold Contributing Authors: Michael S. Chase, Chun-i Chen, Tetsuo Kotani, Cheng-yi Lin, Chunhao Lou, Mira Rapp-Hooper, Yann-huei Song, Joanna Yu Taylor C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF358 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover image: Detailed look at Eastern China and Taiwan (Anton Balazh/Fotolia). Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Disputes over land features and maritime zones in the East China Sea and South China Sea have been growing in prominence over the past decade and could lead to serious conflict among the claimant countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthen Coordination on Countering Maritime Coercion Ashley Townshend and Toby Warden
    STRENGTHEN COORDINATION ON COUNTERING MARITIME COERCION ASHLEY TOWNSHEND AND TOBY WARDEN 66 Context and background tance and information-sharing initiatives to illuminate countries to push back more effectively on grey zone China’s coercive activities.11.4 Such efforts should be activities.11.8 This could extend to widening the role of the Australia and the United States should strengthen expanded and improved through closer strategic coor- US Coast Guard to train and exercise with Indo-Pacific coordinated efforts to counter Chinese grey zone dination within the alliance. counterparts.11.9 activities in maritime Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Over the past decade, China’s use of maritime coer- The second line of effort involves the provision of direct cion has undermined security, sovereignty and stability The Biden administration operational and intelligence support to partners on the frontline of Chinese coercion. Such measures are within Australia’s immediate region, and contributed to Biden’s national security team appears highly supportive intended to increase the stakes for Beijing should it seek the expansion of its strategic influence. These activities of this agenda. The National Security Council’s (NSC) to disrupt lawful maritime activities and help regional have intensified during COVID-19. Chinese naval and Coordinator for the Indo-Pacific, Kurt Campbell, has states defend their maritime rights more effectively. coastguard vessels are intimidating their Southeast Asian advocated strengthening multinational thresholds and This could include an expansion of coordinated patrols equivalents, disrupting fishing ships and hydrocarbon penalties for low-level coercion.11.5 Similarly, US Deputy and presence activities by allied navies and coast- exploration platforms, and supporting maritime militias Secretary of Defense, Kathleen Hicks, has emphasised 11.1 guards in order to prevent coercion, assure partners in disputed waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Spratly Islands
    R i 120 110 u T4-Y5 o Ganzhou Fuqing n h Chenzhou g Haitan S T2- J o Dao Daojiang g T3 S i a n Putian a i a n X g i Chi-lung- Chuxiong g n J 21 T6 D Kunming a i Xingyi Chang’an o Licheng Xiuyu Sha Lung shih O J a T n Guilin T O N pa Longyan T7 Keelung n Qinglanshan H Na N Lecheng T8 T1 - S A an A p Quanzhou 22 T'ao-yüan Taipei M an T22 I L Ji S H Zhongshu a * h South China Sea ng Hechi Lo-tung Yonaguni- I MIYAKO-RETTO S K Hsin-chu- m c Yuxi Shaoguan i jima S A T21 a I n shih Suao l ) Zhangzhou Xiamen c e T20 n r g e Liuzhou Babu s a n U T Taichung e a Quemoy p i Meizhou n i Y o J YAEYAMA-RETTO a h J t n J i Taiwan C L Yingcheng K China a a Sui'an ( o i 23 n g u H U h g n g Fuxing T'ai- a s e i n Strait Claimed Straight Baselines Kaiyuan H ia Hua-lien Y - Claims in the Paracel and Spratly Islands Bose J Mai-Liao chung-shih i Q J R i Maritime Lines u i g T9 Y h e n e o s ia o Dongshan CHINA u g B D s Tropic of Cancer J Hon n Qingyuan Tropic of Cancer Established maritime boundary ian J Chaozhou Makung n Declaration of the People’s Republic of China on the Baseline of the Territorial Sea, May 15, 1996 g i Pingnan Heyuan PESCADORES Taiwan a Xicheng an Wuzhou 21 25° 25.8' 00" N 119° 56.3' 00" E 31 21° 27.7' 00" N 112° 21.5' 00" E 41 18° 14.6' 00" N 109° 07.6' 00" E While Bandar Seri Begawan has not articulated claims to reefs in the South g Jieyang Chaozhou 24 T19 N BRUNEI Claim line Kaihua T10- Hsi-yü-p’ing Chia-i 22 24° 58.6' 00" N 119° 28.7' 00" E 32 19° 58.5' 00" N 111° 16.4' 00" E 42 18° 19.3' 00" N 108° 57.1' 00" E China Sea (SCS), since 1985 the Sultanate has claimed a continental shelf Xinjing Guiping Xu Shantou T11 Yü Luxu n Jiang T12 23 24° 09.7' 00" N 118° 14.2' 00" E 33 19° 53.0' 00" N 111° 12.8' 00" E 43 18° 30.2' 00" N 108° 41.3' 00" E X Puning T13 that extends beyond these features to a hypothetical median with Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitsun Reef
    Whitsun reef April 1, 2021 In news : Recently, Philippine authorities announced that many of the Chinese fishing vessels that have been moored near the disputed Whitsun Reef in the Spratly Islands A brief note on the issue China’s aggressive expansion in the region has found a new ground, Whitsun Reef, where more than two hundred Chinese vessels are currently moored through the area, which comes under the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). China’s claim However, China claims the reef under their nine-dash line and says that the vessels stationed since March 7 and are fishing boats seeking refuge during bad weather and not Chinese maritime militia as reported. What was phillipines response? The Philippine Coast Guard, however, is not shying away from taking a hard stance. Currently, Philippine military aircrafts and navy are monitoring the situation daily, and China has been warned that there will be an increased military presence to conduct ‘sovereignty patrols’ Previous evidences of China’s aggressiveness The Philippines is of the concern that if China is successful with its moves, the Philippines may lose another fishing ground, similar to what happened in 2012 when China took control of Scarborough Shoal. In April last year, China sank a Vietnamese fishing vessel and also disrupted Malaysian oil exploration. This prompted the United States to deploy aircraft and navy vessels to assess the situation. Dispute between China & Philippines over the South China sea China and the Philippines, along with other Southeast Asian countries, have long been part of disputes over sovereign claims over the region’s islands, reefs and seabeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Briefing
    International Boundaries Research Unit MARITIME BRIEFING Volume 2 Number 1 The Spratly Islands Dispute: Who’s On First? Daniel J. Dzurek Maritime Briefing Volume 2 Number 1 ISBN 1-897643-23-3 1996 The Spratly Islands Dispute: Who’s On First? by Daniel J. Dzurek Edited by Clive Schofield International Boundaries Research Unit Department of Geography University of Durham South Road Durham DH1 3LE UK Tel: UK + 44 (0) 191 334 1961 Fax: UK +44 (0) 191 334 1962 E-mail: [email protected] www: http://www-ibru.dur.ac.uk The Author Daniel J Dzurek works as an international boundary consultant for oil companies, map makers, and law firms. Formerly, he was a research associate at the East-West Center in Honolulu and served in the US Department of State as Chief of the Spatial, Environmental, and Boundary Analysis Division in the Office of the Geographer. While at State, he authored five issues of Limits in the Seas, participated in three negotiating sessions on the Russia-US maritime boundary treaty, and assisted in the US submission to the ICJ in the Gulf of Maine Case. He has published extensively on maritime boundary issues. The opinions contained herein are those of the author and are not to be construed as those of IBRU. Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Physical Geography 1 3. Definitional Problems 3 3.1 Where are the Spratly islands? 3 3.2 When is Chigua Reef not Chigua Jiao? 4 4. History of Claims 7 4.1 Before the Twentieth Century 7 4.1.1 China 7 4.1.2 Vietnam 8 4.2 Early Twentieth Century 9 4.3 Aftermath of World War II 10 4.3.1 Republican
    [Show full text]