Marine Litter Assessment in the Mediterranean 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GHOST GEAR: the ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS Sea Turtle Entangled in Fishing Gear in the Mediterranean Sea © Marco Care/Greenpeace CONTENTS
GHOST GEAR: THE ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS Sea turtle entangled in fishing gear in the Mediterranean Sea © Marco Care/Greenpeace CONTENTS 4 Zusammenfassung 5 Executive summary 6 Introduction 8 Main types of fishing – Nets – Lines – Traps & pots – FADs 11 Ghost gear impacts – Killing ocean creatures – Damaging habitats – Economic and other impacts 13 Current regulations – International agreements and recommendations – Other programmes and resolutions – A cross-sector approach – The need for a Global Ocean Treaty 16 References 2019 / 10 Published by Greenpeace Germany November 2019 Stand Greenpeace e. V., Hongkongstraße 10, 20457 Hamburg, Tel. 040/3 06 18 - 0, [email protected] , www . greenpeace . de Authors Karli Thomas, Dr. Cat Dorey and Farah Obaidullah Responsible for content Helena Spiritus Layout Klasse 3b, Hamburg S 0264 1 Contents 3 DEUTSCHE ZUSAMMENFASSUNG DER STUDIE GHOST GEAR: THE ABANDONED FISHING NETS HAUNTING OUR OCEANS → Rund 640.000 Tonnen altes Fischereigerät inklusive Geisternetzen, Bojen, Leinen, Fallen und Körbe landen jährlich als Fischereimüll in den Ozeanen. → Weltweit trägt altes Fischereigerät zu etwa zehn Prozent zum Plastikeintrag in die Meere bei. → 45 Prozent aller Arten auf der Roten IUCN-Liste hatten bereits Kontakt mit Plastik im Meer. → Sechs Prozent aller eingesetzten Netze, neun Prozent aller Fallen und 29 Prozent aller Langleinen gehen jährlich auf den Ozeanen verloren und enden als Meeresmüll. → Treibnetze, Fallen und Fischsammler (Fish Aggregating Devices, FADs) gehen weltweit am häufigsten als Müll auf den Ozeanen verloren und bergen die meisten Risiken für Meereslebewesen. → Durch FADs sterben 2,8 bis 6,7 Mal mehr Tiere - darunter bedrohte Arten wie Haie – als Beifang als die Zielarten, für die sie eingesetzt werden. -
Ghost Net Impacts on Coral Reefs Time to Complete Lesson: 20-30 Minutes
Ghost (net) Busters Ghost Net Impacts on Coral Reefs Time to complete lesson: 20-30 minutes Purpose of module: This module allows students to simulate the impacts of ghost nets on a coral reef. Students will build a model healthy reef ecosystem, damage it using a ghost net, and then remove it from the reef. Students will conduct a damage assessment caused by the net dragging across the reef using quadrats. Background information: Coral reefs, also known as the rainforests of the sea, are one of the most diverse and ecologically complex marine ecosystems. They are found in warm, tropical waters with high salinity and high light exposure. A coral reef is made up of individual coral polyps that resemble tiny anemones and are attached to the reef. Each coral polyp is less than half an inch in diameter, but they live in colonies which Figure 1: A healthy coral reef system. can expand and take up the size of a small car. Reef building corals have a skeleton made of calcium carbonate, a mineral that is left behind when an individual coral dies. Another coral may settle on that spot and grow on top of the remaining skeleton. This allows a coral reef to grow a few centimeters each year, eventually reaching massive sizes. Coral reefs provide food and shelter for many plants, invertebrates, and fish. It is estimated that at least 25% of all marine life spendCredit: part MostBeautifulThings.net of their life at a coral reef. Coral reefs provide shelter for small fish, and small fish attract larger fish, which in turn attract large predators like sharks. -
Sea Turtle Stranding Response & Rescue 2019 Summary of Results
Sea Turtle Stranding Response & Rescue 2019 Summary of Results, Maui, Hawaiʻi Tommy Cutt, Jennifer Martin MOC Marine Institute 192 Maʻalaea Rd. Wailuku, Hawaiʻi 96793 www.mocmarineinstitute.org 2019 Stranding Summary Maui, Hawaiʻi Contents Background.........................................................................................................................................................3 Team....................................................................................................................................................................4 Partners & Collaborators.....................................................................................................................................4 Sea Turtle Stranding Data...................................................................................................................................5 Map: Stranding Type by Location......................................................................................................................8 Fishing Gear......................................................................................................................................................11 Map: Heat Map of Fishery Interactions............................................................................................................12 Fishing Line Recycling Program......................................................................................................................13 Map: Fishing Line Recycling Bin Locations....................................................................................................14 -
2. the Tyrrhenian Sea Before Leg 1071
2. THE TYRRHENIAN SEA BEFORE LEG 1071 J. P. Rehault2, J. Mascle2, A. Fabbri3, E. Moussat4, and M. Thommeret2 The Tyrrhenian Sea (Fig. 1) is a small triangular marine ba• is bisected by the Marsili Seamount, the largest volcano within sin surrounded by Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and peninsular It• the Tyrrhenian Sea, culminating at 505 m. The Magnaghi, Vav• aly, lying between the Neogene Western Mediterranean Basin ilov, and Marsili volcanoes are tens of kilometers (30-50) in and the Mesozoic Ionian and Levantine Basins (Biju Duval et length. They are similarly elongated and subparallel with their al., 1978). The Tyrrhenian Sea has been, for more than a dec• long axis trending N10°-20°E. ade, the subject of many geophysical and geological explorations summarized by Morelli (1970), Boccaletti and Manetti (1978), Continental Margins Lort (1978), Moussat (1983), Duchesnes et al. (1986), and Re• The northern Sicily and western Calabria continental mar• hault et al. (1984, 1987). The evolution of the Tyrrhenian Sea is gins average 100-120 km in width. They are characterized by a unusual and intriguing in that the basin has developed both system of close-spaced sediment-filled upper slope basins, the back of a subduction-volcanic-arc system (the Calabrian arc) Cefalu, Gioia, and Paola Basins (Perityrrhenian Basins, Selli, and inside of successive collision zones (Alpine and Apennines 1970; Basin and Range System, Hsu, 1978). An arcuate belt of s.l.). Collision is still active both east and south of the Tyrrhe• volcanoes known as the Eolian Islands follows the curve of the nian in the peninsular Apennines and Sicily. -
The Historical Geothermal Investigations of Campanian Volcanoes: Constrains for Magma Source Location and Geothermal Potential Assessment S
GNGTS 2011 SESSIONE 1.3 THE HISTORICAL GEOTHERMAL INVESTIGATIONS OF CAMPANIAN VOLCANOES: CONSTRAINS FOR MAGMA SOURCE LOCATION AND GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT S. Carlino, G. De Natale, C. Troise, R. Somma Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Napoli “Osservatorio Vesuviano”, Napoli, Italy The Campania region is characterized by the presence of the active volcanoes of Phlegrean dis- trict (Campi Flegrei and Ischia calderas), west to the city of Naples, and Somma-Vesuvius to the east. Most of this area is marked by the occurrence of anomalous high heat flow and temperature at very shallow depth (Geothermal gradient: 150-200°C at Campi Flegrei and Ischia respectively; 30°C/km at Vesuvius. Heat flow: Mofete, 160mWm-2; S.Vito and Mt.Nuovo, 160mWm-2; Agnano:120 mWm-2; Ischia western and southern sector, 560-580mWm-2). These features are relat- ed to different causes: the rising of the Moho (~ 20 km of depth) and the thinning of the crust in the central part of the Tyrrhenian Basin, due to the spreading of the sea floor; the migration of magma at a minimum depth of 8-10 km due to the buoyancy forces; the geothermal fluids circulation above the magmatic sources. The study of the geothermal systems of Campanian volcanoes represents an important tool for the understanding of volcano dynamic and associated risk, and also for the quan- tification of the geothermal potential for thermal and electric energy production. Pioneering researches of geothermal resources were carried out in Campanian region since 1930. Such researches were part of the Energy National Plan, aimed to better constrain the geother- mal potential in the volcanic district of Campania (Vesuvius, Campi Flegrei caldera and Ischia Island), and were supported by a Joint Venture between ENEL and AGIP Companies. -
Marine Litter Legislation: a Toolkit for Policymakers
Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Acknowledgments This report was developed by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It was researched, drafted, and produced by Carl Bruch, Kathryn Mengerink, Elana Harrison, Davonne Flanagan, Isabel Carey, Thomas Casey, Meggan Davis, Elizabeth Hessami, Joyce Lombardi, Norka Michel- en, Colin Parts, Lucas Rhodes, Nikita West, and Sofia Yazykova. Within UNEP, Heidi Savelli, Arnold Kreilhuber, and Petter Malvik oversaw the development of the report. The authors express their appreciation to the peer reviewers, including Catherine Ayres, Patricia Beneke, Angela Howe, Ileana Lopez, Lara Ognibene, David Vander Zwaag, and Judith Wehrli. Cover photo: Plastics floating in the ocean The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2016. United Nations Environment Programme. Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers Contents Foreword .................................................................................................. -
In the Wake of Plastics 13-15 October 2015 Don Orione Artigianelli Conference Center, Venice, Italy
Derelict Fishing Gear management system in the Adriatic Region www.defishgear.net In the Wake of Plastics 13-15 October 2015 Don Orione Artigianelli Conference Center, Venice, Italy Preliminary Programme: Tuesday: October 13th 2015 08:15 09:00 Registration 09:00 09:20 Opening and welcome MARINE LITTER Chairs: C. Zeri, G. Pojana 09:20 10:00 Invited lecture F. Galgani L 13.1.1 – Marine Litter in the Mediterranean Sea 10:00 10:20 C. Zeri – Beach Litter in the Southern Adriatic coasts: Results from a fine-scale L 13.1.2 sampling 10:20 10:40 S. Aliani – To strand or not to strand: the fate of plastic debris in coastal currents L 13.1.3 10:40 11:00 C. Mazziotti – The origin of marine litter and its environmental impacts during L 13.1.4 recent decades 11:00 11:30 Coffee break GHOST NETS Chairs: A. Krzan, T. Fortibuoni 11:30 11:50 P. Tutman – Ghost-net fishing along the Croatian coastline; occurrence and L 13.2.1 biological impact on marine biodiversity, a preliminary assesment 11:50 12:10 F. Riccato – First data on ghost fishing gears and other fishing waste in the L 13.2.2 outcrop area of the Gulf of Venice 12:10 12:30 Conference sponsor presentation – MADAtec L 13.2.3 D. Manzini – Hiphenated spectroscopic microanalysis (Raman, colorimetry) 12:30 12.50 M. Angiolillo – Monitoring and assessment of marine debris in a biodiversity L 13.2.4 hotspot in the Northern Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean Sea) 12:50 14:00 Lunch break and Poster session The project is co-funded by the European Union,Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance Derelict Fishing Gear management system in the Adriatic Region www.defishgear.net Tuesday: October 13th 2015 SOCIAL AND ECONOMICAL IMPACTS Chairs: F. -
Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ Via Derelict Fishing Gear
2015 NOAA Marine Debris Program Report Impact of “Ghost Fishing“ via Derelict Fishing Gear 2015 MARINE DEBRIS GHOST FISHING REPORT March 2015 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science – Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 219 Ft. Johnson Rd. Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Office of Response and Restoration NOAA Marine Debris Program 1305 East-West Hwy, SSMC4, Room 10239 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Cover photo courtesy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration For citation purposes, please use: NOAA Marine Debris Program. 2015 Report on the impacts of “ghost fishing” via derelict fishing gear. Silver Spring, MD. 25 pp For more information, please contact: NOAA Marine Debris Program Office of Response and Restoration National Ocean Service 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 301-713-2989 Acknowledgements The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Debris Program would like to acknowledge Jennifer Maucher Fuquay (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) for conducting this research, and Courtney Arthur (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) and Jason Paul Landrum (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for providing guidance and support throughout this process. Special thanks go to Ariana Sutton-Grier (NOAA National Ocean Science) and Peter Murphy (NOAA National Ocean Service, Marine Debris Program) for reviewing this paper and providing helpful comments. Special thanks also go to John Hayes (NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science) and Dianna Parker (NOAA National Ocean Science, Marine Debris Program) for a copy/edit review of this report and Leah L. -
1 Sustainable Use of Marine Resources Focus Group Final Report Submitted to the Marine Biodiversity Working Group 21 Sept 2014
Final Report 21 Sept 2014 Sustainable Use of Marine Resources Focus Group Final Report Submitted to the Marine Biodiversity Working Group 21 Sept 2014 A) Introduction to the Focus Group Aim / objective To examine the sustainability of the current and predicted use of marine resources in Hong Kong, and make recommendations for improvement and/or areas of further study. Scope All uses of the sub-tidal coast and sea within Hong Kong that use biodiversity as an important component of the activity (this excludes activities that simply impact biodiversity such as reclamation and shipping). Relevant Aichi Targets and Articles Target 6. By 2020 all fish and invertebrate stocks and aquatic plants are managed and harvested sustainably, legally and applying ecosystem based approaches, so that overfishing is avoided, recovery plans and measures are in place for all depleted species, fisheries have no significant adverse impacts on threatened species and vulnerable ecosystems and the impacts of fisheries on stocks, species and ecosystems are within safe ecological limits. Target 4. By 2020, at the latest, Governments, business and stakeholders at all levels have taken steps to achieve or have implemented plans for sustainable production and consumption and have kept the impacts of use of natural resources well within safe ecological limits. Target 7. By 2020 areas under agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, ensuring conservation of biodiversity. Target 14. By 2020, ecosystems that provide essential services, including services related to water, and contribute to health, livelihoods and well-being, are restored and safeguarded, taking into account the needs of women, indigenous and local communities, and the poor and vulnerable. -
Mass Failures Scenarios from the Flanks of the Marsili Submarine
Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 21, EGU2019-10621, 2019 EGU General Assembly 2019 © Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Mass failures scenarios from the flanks of the Marsili submarine volcano, Tyrrhenian sea, and consequent tsunami hazard Glauco Gallotti (1), Stefano Tinti (1), Filippo Zaniboni (1), Gianluca Pagnoni (1), and Claudia Romagnoli (2) (1) University of Bologna, DIFA, Geophysics, Bologna, Italy ([email protected]), (2) University of Bologna, BIGEA, Geology, Bologna, Italy The Marsili Seamount (MS) is the biggest volcanic structure in Europe, located in the axial portion of the Marsili Basin, in the southern part of the Tyrrhenian sea. The MS is 70 km long, 30 km wide and about 3000 m high, arising from a depth of - 3500 m to - 500 m. In this work, we present a number of scenarios of possible mass failures occurring on the eastern flank of this structure, covering a broad range of volumes. The landslides are simulated by means of two different numerical models. In one model, that is a new original mechanical model and is implemented in the numerical code UBO-Inter, the moving body is represented by a number of point masses that can be seen as the projection on the sliding surface of the center of mass of the elements the system is discretized into. The other (implemented in the code UBO-Block) is based on the partition of the landslide into a matrix of blocks whose dynamics is computed through a Lagrangian approach. The mass failures modelled for the Marsili have the potential to be tsunamigenic and hence our study may be also seen as a significant contribution to tsunami hazard assessment in the pery-Tyrrhenian region. -
Perspectives of Offshore Geothermal Energy in Italy
EPJ Web of Conferences 54, 02001 (2013) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/ 20135402001 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences - SIF, 2013 Perspectives of offshore geothermal energy in Italy F. B. Armani Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Milano - Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy D. Paltrinieri Eurobuilding S.p.a - Via dell’artigianato 6, 63029 Servigliano (FM), Italy Summary. — Italy is the first European and world’s fifth largest producer of geothermal energy for power generation which actually accounts for less than 2% of the total electricity production of the country. In this paper after a brief intro- duction to the basic elements of high-enthalpy geothermal systems, we discuss the potentialities represented by the submarine volcanoes of the South Tyrrhenian Sea. In particular we focus on Marsili Seamount which, according to the literature data, can be considered as a possible first offshore geothermal field; then we give a sum- mary of the related exploitation pilot project that may lead to the realization of a 200 MWe prototype power plant. Finally we discuss some economic aspects and the development perspectives of the offshore geothermal resource taking into account the Italian energy framework and Europe 2020 renewable energy target. 1. – Introduction Geothermal energy represents one of the most interesting as well as globally less exploited energy sources. In particular among renewables, it benefits from high poten- tialities concerning both low-enthalpy applications and power generation. Regarding the second application, Italy has a well-consolidated know-how. Indeed, in 1904, the This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 2. -
Recreational Fishing in the Baltic Sea Region
PROTECTING THE BALTIC SEA ENVIRONMENT - WWW.CCB.SE RECREATIONAL FISHING IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION Coalition Clean Baltic Researched and written by Niki Sporrong for Coalition Clean Baltic E-mail: [email protected] Address: Östra Ågatan 53, 753 22 Uppsala, Sweden www.ccb.se © Coalition Clean Baltic 2017 With the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community and the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Contents Background ...................................................................................................................4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................5 Summary .......................................................................................................................6 Terminology .................................................................................................................12 Finland (not including Åland1) .....................................................................................15 Estonia ..........................................................................................................................23 Latvia ............................................................................................................................32 Lithuania ......................................................................................................................39 Russia (Kaliningrad region) ..........................................................................................45