On Rewriting Reconstruction History Author(S): Howard K. Beale Source: the American Historical Review, Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
On Rewriting Reconstruction History Author(s): Howard K. Beale Source: The American Historical Review, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Jul., 1940), pp. 807-827 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the American Historical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1854452 . Accessed: 04/03/2011 13:42 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and American Historical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org ON REWRITING RECONSTRUCTION HISTORY1 FOR many yearsboth Northernersand Southernerswho wroteon Reconstructionwere dominatedby sectionalfeelings still embittered by the Civil War. Men of the postwardecades were more concerned with justifyingtheir own positionthan theywere with painstakingsearch fortruth. Thus HilaryHerbert and his corroboratorspresented a South- ern indictmentof Northernpolicies, and Henry Wilson's historywas a brieffor the North.Few Southernerswere writing history. Northern historianslong acceptedthe thesisof Radical Republicansthat Radicals had saved theUnion bytheir Reconstruction program, that their Demo- craticopponents were traitors,and thatAndrew Johnson was a drunk- ard and an incompetent.A much-neededrevision came at about the turnof the century,associated principally with Rhodes and the "Dun- ning school".For the firsttime meticulous and thoroughresearch was carriedon in an effortto determinethe truthrather than to prove a thesis.The emphasisof the Dunning schoolwas upon the harm done to the South by Radical Reconstructionand upon the sordidpolitical and economicmotives behind Radicalism.Rhodes and the Dunning group drew a pictureof a South that-but for outsideinterference- mighthave made a happyand practicalreadjustment suited to thenew social,economic, and politicalorder. Rhodes, however, while crediting the President'sfaults to weaknessrather than to wickedness,yet ac- ceptedthe older pictureof AndrewJohnson and blamed his mistakes for much of the disasterthat overtook the South. Then still another group rehabilitatedJohnson. Dewitt rewrotethe storyof the impeach- mentas earlyas 1902.2 Schouler'slast volume,which appeared in 1913, carriedthe revisionfurther.3 In the twentiesa groupof historianscom- pleted the processwith severaldetailed studies of Johnson'scareer.4 About the same timeBowers gave the publichis rathersuperficial but 1 Based on a paper read at a mcetingof the SouthernHistorical Association oi November3, 1939. 2 David MillerDewitt, The Impeachmentand Trial of AndrewJohnson (New York, I 903). 3 JamesSchouler, History of the UnitedStates of Americaunder the Constitution, Vol. VII (New York,I913). 4 RobertW. Winston,Andrew Johnson,Plebeian and Patriot(New York, 1928); Lloyd Paul Stryker,Andrew Johnson: A Studyin Courage (New York, 1936); George FortMilton, The Age of Hate (New York, I930). 807 8o8 Howard K. Beale widelyread study of theperiod.5 His workwas basedon theserious studyof the revisionists.It acceptedtheir reinterpretations. But it departedso farfrom the older pro-Republican point of viewthat it becamealmost a Democraticcampaign document. Feeling that the pendulumhad swungtoo far, several younger historians have initiated a newrevision. As faras ithas gone, this latest rewriting seems to stand uponsubstantial ground. Yet its point of view has not become "classic", as theDunning reinterpretation did.The ideasof theDunning school stilllargely influence writing on theReconstruction period. It would seem thatit is now timefor a youngergeneration of Southernhistorians to ceaselauding those who "restoredwhite supre- macy"and insteadto beginanalyzing the restorationists' interests to see justwhat they stood for in opposingthe Radicals. Such a studyof Reconstructionwill certainly rehabilitate some of the Radical leaders in theSouth, even as theequally denounced President of the United States was rehabilitateda few years ago. A constituentfor whom Sumner had obtaineda Freedmen'sBureau appointment once wrote Sumner from theSouth: "After six months of intimate association I have determined on thestartling proposition that a manis notnecessarily a saint because black,nor a devil,because white." 6 Even Northernhistorians would universallyaccept this once "startling proposition". Yet someof them have approacheddangerously near to its converse.In acceptingthe terms"carpetbagger" and "scalawag"historians have almost inevitably acceptedcertain contemporary biases along with the suggestive names. Is it not timethat we studiedthe history of Reconstructionwithout firstassuming, at leastsubconsciously, that carpetbaggers and Southern whiteRepublicans were wicked, that Negroes were illiterate incom- petents,and thatthe whole white South owes a debtof gratitudeto therestorers of "whitesupremacy"? Some younghistorians, most of themSoutherners, have already answeredthis question affirmatively byproceeding to writehistory in a new spirit.Just as Rhodes,Dunning, Dunning's pupils, and others of theDunning school rendered a servicea generationago by careful researchesinto political sources and by writingwith an attitudefreed fromthe war animositiesof theirfathers, so anothernew generation has begunto retellthe story in termsof the economic and socialforces at workand withoutthe preconceptions that limited the earlier group. Of the Dunningschool itself a few,like MildredThompson, Flem- 5 Claude G. Bowers,The TragicEra (Cambridge,Ig2g). 6 j. C. Beecherfrom Summerville, South Carolina, to CharlesSumner, OCt. 25, 1867, SumnerMSS., LXXIV, WidenerLibrary, Harvard University. On RewritingReconstruction History 809 ing,and Garner,delved into social and economiclife, though without seeingits full implication; Miss Lonn and MissThompson, to a certain extent,and Garner,notably, escaped from the restrictingframes of referenceof theothers.7 Years ago AlexMathews Arnett led the way in reinterpretationof Georgia Bourbons.8 Among the younger historians to whomwe mustturn for reinterpretation areFrancis B. Simkins,C. Vann Woodward,Horace Mann Bond,Vernon L. Wharton,Paul Lewinson,Roger W. Shugg,James S. Allen.And there is one,no longer young,W. E. BurghardtDu Bois,whose race and socialphilosophy givehis work, Black Reconstruction,9 freshness. Du Bois'svolume is far too wordy;it is distortedby insistenceupon moldingfacts into a Marxianpattern.10 Yet in describingthe Negro'srole Du Bois has presenteda massof material,formerly ignored, that every future his- torianmust reckon with. Allen's application of Marxiantheory to the periodhas also forcedupon those of us whodo notaccept his general interpretationcertain important modifications of our own pointsof view." From a non-Marxianpoint of view Shugghas describedin one statethe class struggle between merchants and planters,on theone hand,and smallfarmers and laborers,on theother, and has pointed out thatthis conflict began in -ante-bellum days and continuedthrough Populism.'2Lewinson pioneered ten years ago in restudyingthe Negro's placein Southernhistory.'3 Wharton, a native Mississippian, in a study of theNegro in hisstate from i86o to I89o, haspresented facts that are 7 Ella Lonn, of course, like several othersof the group, was not a studentof Dunning's,but she is nonethelessone of themost distinguished members of the "Dunning school". 8 The PopulistMovement in Georgia: A View of the "AgrarianCrusade" in the Light of Solid-SouthPolitics (New York, i922). 9 New York, 1935. 10 Some Marxistswould disown Du Bois. Yet his interpretationhe owes to Marx's influence.Perhaps it would be fairerto Marx to call Du Bois a quasi-Marxist. 11 Recanstruction(New York, I937). 12 Originsof Class Strugglein Louisiana: A Social Historyof WhiteFarmers and Laborersduring Slavery and after,I840-I875 (University,La., I939). Unfortunately, thoughhe does an admirablejob in tracingthe class struggleand its implications,Shugg merelymentions casually in passingmany of the most importantfactors, such as cor- ruptionunder the Conservativesbefore Radicals came intopower, the relationof business to government,the profitthat respectable Southern whites made fromRadical corruption, the failureof the Radicals to accomplishimportant social reforms,and theireffect upon education.This is a pitysince he has broughtsuch fine understanding to thedevelopment of his major thesis.Furthermore, by his failureto carryhis studyon throughthe days of the restorationistsup to the full floweringof Populism,he failsto shed the lighton