International Collaboration in Space Solar Physics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PPS04-02 Room:A03 Time:May 27 12:25-12:45 International collaboration in space solar physics TSUNETA, Saku1¤ 1ISAS/JAXA Before coming to ISAS on April, 2013, I had worked for the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan as an astronomer, and had been involved in 4 satellites, 2 balloons, and 2 sounding rocket experiments. I have been observing the sun with these missions in the past 30 years. I started my career with hard X-ray and gamma ray instrumentation in 1970s in ISAS Hinotori solar satellite as a graduate student, then moving to the development of the soft X-ray telescope with NASA in 1980s for ISAS Yohkoh mission, proceeding to the visible light space telescope again developed with NASA from late 1990s for ISAS Hinode satellite. I had proposed the basic concepts of both the Yohkoh and the Hinode missions with my colleagues. Solar physics has been enjoying the golden age in the past 25 years with Yohkoh and Hinode. In particular, very successful Yohkoh changed the dim scenery of the discipline, and paved the way for series of space solar missions thereafter. Yohkoh and GEOTAIL would be the ﬁrst two missions for which NASA decided to work with Japan in a signiﬁcant way. That happened as early as 1986. Missions such as Hinode, Suzaku, ASCA, GEOTAIL and Yohkoh were tremendous success affecting not only that disciplines but to all space science. International collaboration as a means to combine assets scattered in the world namely good people, technology and money has to be pursued ever more in this turbulent era for the sake of science. ISAS/JAXA is always seeing for collaboration with international partners for any ISAS/JAXA missions. We are also eager to participate in missions led by foreign agencies. Keywords: Space Science 1/1.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

XIII Publications, Presentations
XIII Publications, Presentations 1. Refereed Publications E., Kawamura, A., Nguyen Luong, Q., Sanhueza, P., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: First Results from Aasi, J., et al. including Fujimoto, M.-K., Hayama, K., Kawamura, High Angular Resolution Observations toward the HL Tau Region, S., Mori, T., Nishida, E., Nishizawa, A.: 2015, Characterization of ApJ, 808, L3. the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Classical Quantum ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravity, 32, 115012. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Ao, Y., Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Hatsukade, B., Matsuda, Y., Iono, D., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Astrophysical Implications ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Observations of the Strongly of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914, ApJ, 818, L22. Lensed Submillimeter Galaxy HATLAS J090311.6+003906 at z = Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific 3.042, ApJ, 808, L4. Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Observation of ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Kurono, Lett., 116, 061102. Y., Tatematsu, K.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Observations of Asteroid 3 Juno at 60 Kilometer Resolution, ApJ, Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, GW150914: Implications 808, L2. for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Binary Black Alonso-Herrero, A., et al. including Imanishi, M.: 2016, A mid-infrared Holes, Phys.
[Show full text]
Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer Launch Press
PRess KIT/DECEMBER 2009 Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer Launch Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................................. 3 Quick Facts ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Mission Overview .................................................................................................................................. 5 Why Infrared? ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Science Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 12 Spacecraft ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Science Instrument ............................................................................................................................. 19 Infrared Missions: Past and Present ............................................................................................... 23 NASA’s Explorer Program ................................................................................................................. 25 Program/Project Management .......................................................................................................... 27 Media Contacts J.D. Harrington
[Show full text]
Building the Coolest X-Ray Satellite
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Building the Coolest X-ray Satellite 朱雀 Suzaku A Video Guide for Teachers Grades 9-12 Probing the Structure & Evolution of the Cosmos http://suzaku-epo.gsfc.nasa.gov/ www.nasa.gov The Suzaku Learning Center Presents “Building the Coolest X-ray Satellite” Video Guide for Teachers Written by Dr. James Lochner USRA & NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD Ms. Sara Mitchell Mr. Patrick Keeney SP Systems & NASA/GSFC Coudersport High School Greenbelt, MD Coudersport, PA This booklet is designed to be used with the “Building the Coolest X-ray Satellite” DVD, available from the Suzaku Learning Center. http://suzaku-epo.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Table of Contents I. Introduction 1. What is Astro-E2 (Suzaku)?....................................................................................... 2 2. “Building the Coolest X-ray Satellite” ....................................................................... 2 3. How to Use This Guide.............................................................................................. 2 4. Contents of the DVD ................................................................................................. 3 5. Post-Launch Information ........................................................................................... 3 6. Pre-requisites............................................................................................................. 4 7. Standards Met by Video and Activities ...................................................................... 4 II. Video Chapter 1
[Show full text]
Solar Flares
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150005791 2019-08-31T11:04:12+00:00Z Solar Flares Sabrina Savage (NASA/MSFC) Heliophysics System Observatory (HSO) • Fleet of solar, heliospheric, geospace, and planetary satellites designed to work independently while enabling large-scale collaborative investigations. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/missions/ Heliophysics System Observatory (HSO): http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/missions/ The Sun in Layers Converts 4 million tons of matter into energy every second. Core is as dense as lead. Interplay between magnetic pressure and gas (plasma) pressure. 15 000 000 ∘C “Mysteries of the Sun”: NASA / Jenny Mottar Sun Facts: http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/ The Sun in Layers 15 000 000 ∘C European Space Agency (ESA) Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) “Mysteries of the Sun”: NASA / Jenny Mottar Sun Facts: http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/ Sunspots & Active Regions 1625 May: Christoph Scheiner 2014 April 14: SDO HMI 6173 A European Space Agency (ESA) / Royal Observatory Belgium (ROB) NOAA Active Regions: SolarMonitor.org PROBA2 Science Center (ROB): http://proba2.sidc.be/ Sunspots & Active Regions Formation 4500 A 193 A 131 A SDO / AIA 2014 Apr 13 - 15 JHelioviewer — Explore the Sun: http://jhelioviewer.org/ Sunspots & Active Regions Hinode SOT: NASA / JAXA / NAOJ Sunspot Magnetic fields ~ 3000-6000 times stronger than Earth’s field. Magnetic pressure dominates gas pressure in spot, thus inhibiting convective flow of heat. JHelioviewer SDO / AIA 2014 Apr 04 SOT (CN line 3883 A); 2007 May 2 SOHO animation gallery SOT Picture of the Day (POD): http://sot.lmsal.com/pod?cmd=view-gallery Sunspots & Active Regions Solar Dynamics Observatory (GSFC) Jewel Box: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a004100/a004117/ Sunspots & Active Regions Courtesy of Milo Littenberg Sunspots & Active Regions “SDO Jewel Box” Solar features as seen with 10 different filters (i.e., plasma at different temperatures).
[Show full text]
Smallsat Solar Axion X-Ray Imager (SSAXI)
SSC18-VII-02 SmallSat Solar Axion X-ray Imager (SSAXI) Jaesub Hong Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-496-7512 [email protected] Suzanne Romaine, Christopher S. Moore, Katharine Reeves, Almus Kenter Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Cambridge, MA 02138; 617-496-7719 [email protected] Brian D. Ramsey, Kiranmayee Kilrau NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35812; 256-961-7784 [email protected] Kerstin Perez Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139; 617-324-1522 [email protected] Julia Vogel, Jaime Ruz Armendariz Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94550; 925-424-4815 [email protected] Hugh Hudson Space Science Laboratory UC Berkeley, CA 94720; 510-643-0333 [email protected] ABSTRACT The axion is a promising dark matter candidate as well as a solution to the strong charge-parity (CP) problem in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Therefore, discovery of axions will have far-reaching consequences in astrophysics, cosmology and particle physics. We describe a new concept for SmallSat Solar Axion X-ray Telescope (SSAXI) to search for solar axions or axion-like particles (ALPs). Axions or ALPs are expected to emerge abundantly from the core of stars like the Sun. SSAXI employs Miniature lightweight Wolter-I focusing X-ray optics (MiXO) and monolithic CMOS X-ray sensors to form a sensitive X-ray imaging spectrometer in a compact package (~10 x 10 x 60 cm). The wide energy range (~0.5 – 5 keV) of SSAXI is suitable for capturing the prime spectral feature of axion-converted X-rays (peaking at ~3 – 4 keV) from solar X-ray spectra.
[Show full text]
Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
[Show full text]
MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL
MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
[Show full text]
Science Vision Draft
A Science Vision for European Astronomy ASTRONET SVWG DRAFT December 19, 2006 ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The role of science in society . ............................. 1 1.2 Astronomy . ........................................ 3 1.3 Predicting the future .................................... 5 1.4 This document ........................................ 6 2 Do we understand the extremes of the Universe? 7 2.1 How did the Universe begin? . ............................. 8 2.1.1 Background . .................................... 8 2.1.2 Key observables . ............................. 9 2.1.3 Future experiments . ............................. 9 2.2 What is dark matter and dark energy? . ......................... 10 2.2.1 Current status .................................... 10 2.2.2 Experimental signatures . ............................. 11 2.2.3 Future strategy . ............................. 12 2.3 Can we observe strong gravity in action? . ..................... 13 2.3.1 Background . .................................... 13 2.3.2 Experiments . .................................... 15 2.4 How do supernovae and gamma-ray bursts work? . ................. 17 2.4.1 Current status .................................... 17 2.4.2 Key questions .................................... 18 2.4.3 Future experiments . ............................. 19 2.5 How do black hole accretion, jets and outﬂows operate? . .......... 20 2.5.1 Background . .................................... 20 2.5.2 Experiments . .................................... 21 2.6 What do we learn
[Show full text]
YOHKOH SXT XPE Catalogue: a Description
YOHKOH SXT XPE Catalogue: A Description X-ray Plasma Ejections (XPEs) are dynamical events seen in the solar corona in X-rays. They establish a wide range of macroscopic motions of a magnetized plasma with different morphology, kinematics and physical conditions, usually associated with solar flares. The catalogue contains all XPEs, known for us, observed by the Soft X-ray Telescope (Tsuneta et al., 1991) during the whole time interval of Yohkoh operation, i.e. between 1991 October 1 and 2001 December 14. There are three main surveys of events that we used in our catalogue: 1. Kim et al. (2005) which contains 137 events observed between 1999 April and 2001 March. 2. Ohyama (2009) with 53 events that occurred between 1991 October and 1998 August. The survey was prepared for the aim of statistical research (Ohyama & Shibata, 2000), but it was not published. 3. Chmielewska (2010) which reports 116 events observed mainly within two time inter- vals: 1998 September – 1999 March and 2001 April – 2001 December that were not systematically searched before. We incorporated also 65 XPEs reported in other scientific papers as well as in the elec- tronic bulletin YOHKOH SXT Science Nuggets (http://www.lmsal.com/YPOP/Nuggets/). In summary, our catalogue contains 368 events. We qualified events to the catalogue on the basis of the SXT observations exclusively. For this reason, we omitted some X-ray ejections from years 1991-2001 that are known according to observations made with other instruments alone, like the Yohkoh Hard X-ray Telescope, e.g. Hudson et al. (2001). The general arrangement of the catalogue is a matrix of years and months of observations.
[Show full text]
Low Altitude Solar Magnetic Reconnection, Type III Solar Radio Bursts, and X-Ray Emissions Received: 11 January 2015 I
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Low Altitude Solar Magnetic Reconnection, Type III Solar Radio Bursts, and X-ray Emissions Received: 11 January 2015 I. H. Cairns 1, V. V. Lobzin1,23, A. Donea2, S. J. Tingay3, P. I. McCauley1, D. Oberoi4, R. T. Accepted: 18 December 2017 Dufn1,3,5, M. J. Reiner6,7, N. Hurley-Walker3, N. A. Kudryavtseva 3,8, D. B. Melrose1, J. C. Published: xx xx xxxx Harding1, G. Bernardi9,10,11, J. D. Bowman12, R. J. Cappallo13, B. E. Corey13, A. Deshpande14, D. Emrich 3, R. Goeke15, B. J. Hazelton16, M. Johnston-Hollitt17,3, D. L. Kaplan18, J. C. Kasper10, E. Kratzenberg13, C. J. Lonsdale13, M. J. Lynch3, S. R. McWhirter13, D. A. Mitchell19,3, M. F. Morales16, E. Morgan15, S. M. Ord3,10, T. Prabu14, A. Roshi20, N. Udaya Shankar14, K. S. Srivani15, R. Subrahmanyan14,20, R. B. Wayth 3,21, M. Waterson3,22, R. L. Webster19,21, A. R. Whitney13, A. Williams 3 & C. L. Williams15 Type III solar radio bursts are the Sun’s most intense and frequent nonthermal radio emissions. They involve two critical problems in astrophysics, plasma physics, and space physics: how collective processes produce nonthermal radiation and how magnetic reconnection occurs and changes magnetic energy into kinetic energy. Here magnetic reconnection events are identifed defnitively in Solar Dynamics Observatory UV-EUV data, with strong upward and downward pairs of jets, current sheets, and cusp-like geometries on top of time-varying magnetic loops, and strong outfows along pairs of open magnetic feld lines. Type III bursts imaged by the Murchison Widefeld Array and detected by the Learmonth radiospectrograph and STEREO B spacecraft are demonstrated to be in very good temporal and spatial coincidence with specifc reconnection events and with bursts of X-rays detected by the RHESSI spacecraft.
[Show full text]
Possibilities and Future Vision of Micro/Nano/Pico-Satellites - from Japanese Experiences
CanSat & Rocket Experiment(‘99～） Hodoyoshiハイブリッド-1 ‘14 ロケット Possibilities and Future Vision of Micro/nano/pico-satellites - From Japanese Experiences Shinichi Nakasuka University of Tokyo PRISM ‘09 CubeSat 03,05 Nano-JASMINE ‘15 Contents • Features of Micro/nano/pico-satellites • Japanese History and Lessons Learned – CanSat to CubeSat “First CubeSat on orbit” – From education to practical applications – Important tips for development • Visions on Various Applications of Micro/nano/pico-satellites • University Space Engineering Consortium (UNISEC) and International Collaborations Micro/nano/pico-satellite “Lean Satellite” Micro-satellite: 20-100kg Nano-satellite: 2-20kg Pico-satellite: 0.5-2kg Japanese Governmental Satellites ALOS-1: 4 ton ASNARO: 500 kg Kaguya: 3 ton Hayabusa: 510 kg Motivation of Smaller Satellites Current Problem of Mid-large Satellites ALOS 4.0 (4t) Trend towards 3.5 larger satellites Weight SELENE ・Enormous cost >100M$ 3.0 (3t) ・Development period >5-10 years 2.5 ・Conservative design （ton 2.0 ・Almost governmental use ・No new users and utilization ideas ）・Low speed of innovation 1.5 10-50M$ Micro 1.0 Small-sat /Nano /Pico 0.5 Sat 0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 <50kg Introduce more variedGEO new players intoOTHERS space. 1-5M$ Innovation by Micro/nano/pico satellites (<100kg) 超小型衛星革命 Education Remote sensing Telescope Weather Bio-engineering Re-entry Rendezvous/ Communication Space Science Atmosphere Exploration High Resolution. docking Universty/venture companies’ innovative idea and development process <10M$
[Show full text]
Sdo Sdt Report.Pdf
Solar Dynamics Observatory “…to understand the nature and source of the solar variations that affect life and society.” Report of the Science Definition Team Solar Dynamics Observatory Science Definition Team David Hathaway John W. Harvey K. D. Leka Chairman National Solar Observatory Colorado Research Division Code SD50 P.O. Box 26732 Northwest Research Assoc. NASA/MSFC Tucson, AZ 85726 3380 Mitchell Lane Huntsville, AL 35812 Boulder, CO 80301 Spiro Antiochos Donald M. Hassler David Rust Code 7675 Southwest Research Institute Applied Physics Laboratory Naval Research Laboratory 1050 Walnut St., Suite 426 Johns Hopkins University Washington, DC 20375 Boulder, Colorado 80302 Laurel, MD 20723 Thomas Bogdan J. Todd Hoeksema Philip Scherrer High Altitude Observatory Code S HEPL Annex B211 P. O. Box 3000 NASA/Headquarters Stanford University Boulder, CO 80307 Washington, DC 20546 Stanford, CA 94305 Joseph Davila Jeffrey Kuhn Rainer Schwenn Code 682 Institute for Astronomy Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie NASA/GSFC University of Hawaii Max Planck Str. 2 Greenbelt, MD 20771 2680 Woodlawn Drive Katlenburg-Lindau Honolulu, HI 96822 D37191 GERMANY Kenneth Dere Barry LaBonte Leonard Strachan Code 4163 Institute for Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Naval Research Laboratory University of Hawaii Center for Astrophysics Washington, DC 20375 2680 Woodlawn Drive 60 Garden Street Honolulu, HI 96822 Cambridge, MA 02138 Bernhard Fleck Judith Lean Alan Title ESA Space Science Dept. Code 7673L Lockheed Martin Corp. c/o NASA/GSFC Naval Research Laboratory 3251 Hanover Street Code 682.3 Washington, DC 20375 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Greenbelt, MD 20771 Richard Harrison John Leibacher Roger Ulrich CCLRC National Solar Observatory Department of Astronomy Chilton, Didcot P.O.
[Show full text]