DOCSLIB.ORG

Farr Rossman 2017.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farr Rossman 2017.Pdf 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon ***Tell us why you value the fungal databases*** Data for Puccinia hieracii Puccinia hieracii (Röhl.) H. Mart. 1817 (Urediniomycetes, Uredinales) Puccinia eriophylli H. Jacks. 1918 Note: as 'eriophyllii' Puccinia flosculosorum (Alb. & Schwein.) Röhl. Puccinia sejuncta Syd. 1903 Notes: Autoecious; on Asteraceae. Distribution: Cosmopolitan. Updated prior to 1989 Fungus­Host ­ 924 records were found using the criteria: name = Puccinia hieracii and its synonyms Puccinia eriophylli: Eriophyllum lanatum: Idaho ­ 2, 44,Oregon ­ 44, Eriophyllum nevinii California ­ 3, Eriophyllum sp. California ­ 94,Oregon ­ 94,Wyoming ­ 94, Puccinia flosculosorum: Cnicus sp.: North Dakota ­ 430, Puccinia hieracii: Achyrophorus ciliatus: USSR ­ 36214, Achyrophorus radicatus Chile ­ 6792, Achyrophorus sp. Chile ­ 6792, Acroptilon repens Turkey ­ 45814, Agoseris apargioides California ­ 25284, Agoseris aurantiaca Colorado ­ 489,Idaho ­ 44,Montana ­ 44,Washington ­ 44, 38654,Wyoming ­ 3680, Agoseris cuspidata Wisconsin ­ 2738, Agoseris elata Washington ­ 44, 38654, Agoseris glauca Arizona ­ 3487,Canada ­ 7870, 8376,Colorado ­ 2,Idaho ­ 44,Montana ­ 44,Oregon ­ 44,Washington ­ 44, 2705, 38654,Wyoming ­ 2, 3680, Agoseris gracilens Utah ­ 24331, Agoseris gracilens var. greenei Utah ­ 24331, Agoseris gracilenta Washington ­ 38654, Agoseris grandiflora California ­ 2705, 3395,Montana ­ 44,Washington ­ 44, 38654, Agoseris heterophylla California ­ 3163, 3395, 25284,Utah ­ 24331,Washington ­ 44, 38654, Agoseris parviflora Utah ­ 2, Agoseris scorzonerifolia California ­ 2705, 3395, Agoseris sp. Argentina ­ 11172,Arizona ­ 94,California ­ 94, 25284,Central states ­ 94,Washington ­ 94, 38654,Western states ­ 94, Agoseris taraxacifolia Utah ­ 24331, Agoseris turbinata Montana ­ 44, Arnica frigida USSR ­ 36214, Atractylodes chinensis China ­ 8097, Atractylodes macrocephala China ­ 8097, Carduus sp. Italy, Sicily ­ 45968, Carlina sp. Italy, Sicily ­ 45968, Carlina vulgaris Italy, Sicily ­ 45968, Centaurea affinis Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea aucheri Iran ­ 6855, Centaurea behen Iran ­ 6855, Centaurea carduiformis Turkey ­ 45814, Centaurea cheirolopha Turkey ­ 45814, Centaurea diffusa Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea hyalolepis Cyprus ­ 39286, Centaurea iberica Greece ­ 5985, Centaurea jacea Bulgaria ­ 29774,Czechoslovakia ­ 8224,Denmark ­ 39293,Finland ­ 6276, 39293,Norway ­ 10330, 39293, 39300,Poland ­ 11280, 44009,Sweden ­ 39293,Ukraine ­ 42264, Centaurea lycopifolia Turkey ­ 45814, Centaurea macrocephala Poland ­ 44009,Turkey ­ 45814, https://nt.ars­grin.gov/fungaldatabases/new_allView.cfm?whichone=all&thisName=Puccinia%20hieracii&organismtype=Fungus&fromAllCount=yes 1/11 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon Centaurea mucronifera Turkey ­ 45814, Centaurea nigra Norway ­ 10330, 39293, 39300,United Kingdom ­ 36425, Centaurea parilica Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea phrygia Bulgaria ­ 29774,Finland ­ 6276,Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Centaurea phrygia subsp. austriaca Finland ­ 39293,Norway ­ 10330, 39300, 39333, Centaurea phrygia subsp. pseudophrygia Denmark ­ 39293,Finland ­ 6276, 39333,Norway ­ 10330, 39293, 39300, Centaurea rhenana Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea ruthenica Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Centaurea rutifolia Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea salonitana Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea scabiosa Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea solstitialis Bulgaria ­ 29774,Iran ­ 6855,Turkey ­ 45814,Ukraine ­ 42264, Centaurea sp. Finland ­ 6276, Centaurea stenolepis Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea tagana Algeria ­ 17151, Centaurea uniflora subsp. nervosa Bulgaria ­ 29774, Centaurea virgata Iraq ­ 23619, Centaurea ×jacea­nigra Norway ­ 10330, 39300, Chondrilla juncea Bulgaria ­ 29774,Poland ­ 11280, 44009,Turkey ­ 45814, Cichorium endivia Argentina ­ 11172,Australia ­ 6765, 6767, 6801,Brazil ­ 5819, 34636,California ­ 94,Connecticut ­ 94, 10667,Denmark ­ 39293,Greece ­ 8187,Italy, Sicily ­ 45968,Massachusetts ­ 94,Norway ­ 10330,New York ­ 94,United Kingdom ­ 36425, Cichorium intybus Australia ­ 6732, 6767,Balearic Islands ­ 39294,Bulgaria ­ 29774,California ­ 94, 3163, 25284,Canada ­ 7870, 8376,Chile ­ 6791, 6792,China ­ 38671, 39922,Connecticut ­ 94, 10667,Denmark ­ 39293,Greece ­ 8187,Idaho ­ 44,Iraq ­ 23619,Massachusetts ­ 3774,New Zealand ­ 9855,Norway ­ 10330,New York ­ 94,Oregon ­ 44, 94,Pennsylvania ­ 94, 39011,Poland ­ 11280, 36996, 44009,South Africa ­ 6959, 34234,Sweden ­ 39293,Turkey ­ 45814,Ukraine ­ 42264,United Kingdom ­ 36425,Vermont ­ 94, 3774, 10667, 40421,Washington ­ 44, 94, 38654,Wisconsin ­ 94, Cichorium pumilum Canary Islands ­ 39288,Greece ­ 8187,Turkey ­ 45814, Cichorium sp. Australia ­ 38245,Massachusetts ­ 10667, Cnicus arvensis Vermont ­ 40421, Cnicus sp. Greece ­ 8187, Crepis acuminata California ­ 94, 3774,Colorado ­ 2, 38,Idaho ­ 44,Montana ­ 44,Oregon ­ 44,Utah ­ 24331,Washington ­ 44, 94, 38654,Western states ­ 94, Crepis acuminata var. pleurocarpa California ­ 3163, Crepis atribarba Canada ­ 7870,Idaho ­ 44, Crepis bakeri Oregon ­ 3774, Crepis crocea China ­ 38671, Crepis flexuosa China ­ 25205, 38671, 39922, Crepis glauca Utah ­ 24331, Crepis intermedia Utah ­ 24331,Washington ­ 44,Wyoming ­ 3774, Crepis modocensis Idaho ­ 44, Crepis occidentalis California ­ 94,Utah ­ 3774, 24331,Washington ­ 94,Western states ­ 94, Crepis parviflora Iraq ­ 23619, Crepis pleurocarpa California ­ 25284, Crepis runcinata California ­ 94,Canada ­ 7870,Montana ­ 44,Oregon ­ 44,Utah ­ 24331,Washington ­ 44, 94, 38654,Western states ­ 94, Crepis scopulorum Utah ­ 24331, Crepis sp. California ­ 94, 25284,China ­ 38671,Himalaya ­ 29947,Washington ­ 94,Western states ­ 94, Doronicum austriacum Bulgaria ­ 29774,Poland ­ 11280, Doronicum carpaticum Poland ­ 11280, Doronicum columnae Bulgaria ­ 29774, Doronicum orientale Norway ­ 10330, 39300, 39333,Poland ­ 11280, 44009,Sweden ­ 39333, Eriophyllum sp. California ­ 25284, Hedypnois cretica Algeria ­ 27207, Helichrysum sp. Australia ­ 6767, Hieracium aboense Finland ­ 11181, Hieracium albertinum Idaho ­ 44,Montana ­ 2, 44, 3774,Washington ­ 44, Hieracium albiflorum Alaska ­ 84, 2626,California ­ 2524, 2705, 3163, 3395,Idaho ­ 44,Montana ­ 44,Oregon ­ 44, 3774,Washington ­ 44, 38654,Wyoming ­ 2, Hieracium alpicolum Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium alpinum Poland ­ 11280, 42127, 44009, Hieracium amplexicaule Spain ­ 40282, Hieracium andinum Chile ­ 6792, Hieracium antarcticum Argentina ­ 11172,Falkland Islands ­ 40347, https://nt.ars­grin.gov/fungaldatabases/new_allView.cfm?whichone=all&thisName=Puccinia%20hieracii&organismtype=Fungus&fromAllCount=yes 2/11 1/3/2017 All data for a single taxon Hieracium argillaceum Bulgaria ­ 29774,Poland ­ 11280, Hieracium atratum Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Hieracium aurantiacum Texas ­ 94, Hieracium auricula Finland ­ 11181,Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium barbatum Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Hieracium bauhini Germany ­ 44827,Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium bifidum Bulgaria ­ 29774,Poland ­ 11280, 42127, 44009,Ukraine ­ 36202, 42264, Hieracium boreale Romania ­ 12208,United Kingdom ­ 5577, Hieracium bupleuroides Poland ­ 11280, 42127, 44009, Hieracium caesium Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium caespitosum Lithuania ­ 34393, Hieracium canadense Canada ­ 6965, 8376, 24672,Connecticut ­ 10667,Iowa ­ 10325, 22592,Idaho ­ 44,Massachusetts ­ 10667,Maine ­ 10667,Montana ­ 44,Rhode Island ­ 10667,South Dakota ­ 43,Washington ­ 44, 38654,Wisconsin ­ 2798, 3774, Hieracium carpetanum Spain ­ 40275, 40282, Hieracium castellanum Spain ­ 40275, 40282, Hieracium chilensis Argentina ­ 11172,Chile ­ 6792, Hieracium columbianum Washington ­ 38654, Hieracium crocatum India ­ 5823, Hieracium cyllenaeum Greece ­ 8187, Hieracium cymosum Armenia ­ 12349,Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium cymosum subsp. sabinum Greece ­ 8187, Hieracium djimilense Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium erosulum Spain ­ 10344, 40282, Hieracium fendleri Arizona ­ 241, 3487, Hieracium florentinum Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium gracile California ­ 2705, 3395,Oregon ­ 44,Washington ­ 44, 3774, 38654, Hieracium hoppeanum Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium irasuense Costa Rica ­ 39910, Hieracium japonicum Japan ­ 6973, 22586, Hieracium koernickeanum Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium krameri China ­ 8097, Hieracium lachenalii Poland ­ 42127, 44009,Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium laevicaule Poland ­ 44009, Hieracium laevigatum Czech Republic ­ 40436,Poland ­ 11280, 36996, 44009,Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium mendocinum Argentina ­ 11172, Hieracium mexicanum Mexico ­ 6908, Hieracium murorum Austria ­ 46241,Bulgaria ­ 29774,Europe ­ 41311,Germany ­ 42067, 46241,Lithuania ­ 34393,Poland ­ 11280, 24119, 42127, 44009,Russia ­ 39293,Spain ­ 18974,Ukraine ­ 36202, 42264,United Kingdom ­ 5577, Hieracium nigrescens Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Hieracium olympicum Turkey ­ 45814, Hieracium orimeles United Kingdom ­ 36425, Hieracium pannonicum Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium pannosum Bulgaria ­ 29774,Turkey ­ 45814, Hieracium pannosum subsp. pannosum Greece ­ 8187, Hieracium patagonicum Chile ­ 23301, Hieracium pazense Bolivia ­ 11172, 19108, Hieracium perpropinquum United Kingdom ­ 36425, Hieracium pilosella Bulgaria ­ 29774,Lithuania ­ 34393,Portugal ­ 40282,Romania ­ 12208,Spain ­ 18974,United Kingdom ­ 5577, Hieracium pilosella var. incanum Spain ­ 40275, 40282, Hieracium pilosella var. pulchellum Spain ­ 40275, 40282, Hieracium pilosum Germany ­ 42067, Hieracium praealtum Bulgaria ­ 29774, Hieracium prenanthoides Poland ­ 11280, 44009, Hieracium pulmonarioides Poland ­ 44009, Hieracium racemosum Bulgaria ­ 29774,Greece ­ 8187,Romania ­ 12208, Hieracium racemosum subsp. crinitum Greece ­ 8187, Hieracium racemosum subsp. italicum
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Habitat Restoration in Eastern Washington Wine Vineyards
    NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY By KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Entomology MAY 2019 © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _______________________________ David James, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________ Elizabeth Beers, Ph.D. _______________________________ Joan Davenport, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Lorraine Seymour and Gerry Lauby for their expertise, their organizational skills, their excellence as sounding boards, and hopefully their ability to pass some of that on to me. I thank Cole Provence and my family who were always supportive. I thank all the people who helped me with my statistics, especially Bernardo Chaves. I thank the computer technician who saved my computer’s data and my life. I thank Michael Aquilino. He knows what he did. Finally, I’d like to thank everyone who served on my committee, as well as Laura Lavine, for their guidance along the way. iii NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Abstract by Katharine Denise Buckley, Ph.D. Washington State University May 2019 Chair: David James Perennial crop systems such as wine grapes have begun using cover crops and hedgerows to increase beneficial insects and promote sustainable vineyard management in areas such as New Zealand and California.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Species with Similar Ranges Confined to Similar Habitats in a Landscape?
    Preslia, Praha, 67:25-40, 1995 25 Are species with similar ranges confined to similar habitats in a landscape? Jsou druhy s podobnými areály vázány v krajine na podobná stanovište? Milan C h y t r Ý Department oj Systematic Botany and Geobotany, Masaryk University, Kotlárská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic Chytrý M. (1995): Are species with similar ranges confined to similar habitats in a landscape?• Preslia, Praha, 67:25-40. Corre]ations between the environment (topography, soil factors, canopy cover) and the proportion of plant species with different geographical distributions were studied in the deep crystalline valley of the Dyjerrhaya river on the Czech-Austrian border. Modified classification of species ranges into range types (Arealtypen) of Meuse] et Jager (1992) was used. It is suggested that there is a correlation between the performance of particular range types and certain types of environments. The main trends in the data are summarized in a model based on the canonical correspondence analysis. K e y w o r d s: Plant-environment relationships, phytogeography, canonical correspondence analysis, Dyjerrhaya river valley, podyjírrhayatal Nationa] Park, Czech Republic Introduction The classifjcation of species geographical patterns is a challenging problem in phytogeography. Species ranges with similar shape, size, and geographical confinement to some part of the Earth are grouped into range types (Arealtypen, see Wangerin 1932, Meusel 1943, Holub et Jirásek 1967). It is supposed that species belonging to particular range types are characterized by specific environmental requirements and the classification of a species' range into a range type suggests that the species is confined to a specified environment (Meusel et Jager 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Plant List Douglas County by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Douglas County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 29 Angelica arguta Sharp-tooth angelica Apiaceae 809 Angelica canbyi Canby's angelica Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 997 Lomatium canbyi Canby's desert-parsley Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 474 Osmorhiza chilensis Sweet-cicely Apiaceae 264 Osmorhiza occidentalis Western sweet-cicely Apiaceae 1044 Osmorhiza purpurea Purple sweet-cicely Apiaceae 492 Sanicula graveolens Northern Sierra) sanicle Apiaceae 699 Apocynum androsaemifolium Spreading dogbane Apocynaceae 813 Apocynum cannabinum Hemp dogbane Apocynaceae 681 Asclepias speciosa Showy milkweed Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho PM Technical Note 2B (Revise): Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho - Spokane, Washington ______________________________________________________________________________ TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 2B OCTOBER 2011 REVISION Plants for Pollinators in the Inland Northwest Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Pamela Pavek, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Richard Fleenor, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Mark Stannard, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Pullman, Washington Tim Dring, State Biologist, NRCS, Spokane, Washington Jim Cane, Bee Biology and Systematics Lab, ARS, Logan, Utah Karen Fullen, State Biologist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Loren St. John, Manager, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS Plant Materials Center, Aberdeen, Idaho Brownbelted bumble bee (Bombus griseocollis) visiting a blanketflower (Gaillardia aristata). Pamela Pavek The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide guidance for the design and implementation of conservation plantings to enhance habitat for pollinators including: bees, wasps, butterflies, moths and hummingbirds. Plant species included in this document are adapted to the Inland Northwest, which encompasses northern Idaho, northeastern Oregon and eastern Washington. For species adapted to southern Idaho, southeastern Oregon, northern Nevada and northern Utah, refer to Idaho Plant Materials Technical Note 2A. For lists of species adapted to western Washington and western Oregon, refer to the Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List for Web Page
    Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 Common name Botanical name Family origin big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Aceraceae native box elder Acer negundo var. californicum Aceraceae native common water plantain Alisma plantago-aquatica Alismataceae native upright burhead Echinodorus berteroi Alismataceae native prostrate amaranth Amaranthus blitoides Amaranthaceae native California amaranth Amaranthus californicus Amaranthaceae native Powell's amaranth Amaranthus powellii Amaranthaceae native western poison oak Toxicodendron diversilobum Anacardiaceae native wood angelica Angelica tomentosa Apiaceae native wild celery Apiastrum angustifolium Apiaceae native cutleaf water parsnip Berula erecta Apiaceae native bowlesia Bowlesia incana Apiaceae native rattlesnake weed Daucus pusillus Apiaceae native Jepson's eryngo Eryngium aristulatum var. aristulatum Apiaceae native coyote thistle Eryngium vaseyi Apiaceae native cow parsnip Heracleum lanatum Apiaceae native floating marsh pennywort Hydrocotyle ranunculoides Apiaceae native caraway-leaved lomatium Lomatium caruifolium var. caruifolium Apiaceae native woolly-fruited lomatium Lomatium dasycarpum dasycarpum Apiaceae native large-fruited lomatium Lomatium macrocarpum Apiaceae native common lomatium Lomatium utriculatum Apiaceae native Pacific oenanthe Oenanthe sarmentosa Apiaceae native 1 Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 wood sweet cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae native mountain sweet cicely Osmorhiza chilensis Apiaceae native Gairdner's yampah (List 4) Perideridia gairdneri gairdneri Apiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers of Twin Pillars North Trail, Bingham Springs, Trail Station
    Wildflowers of Twin Pillars North Trail, Bingham Springs, Trail Station Meadows & upper Desolation Canyon Mill Creek Wilderness & Ochoco National Forest Data from personal observations & Data Provided by the Oregon Flora Project & Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria Taxa with a question mark have been found within 10 miles of this site but not yet documented onsite. Last updated May 28, 2018 Common Name Scientific Name Family ____ Black Elderberry Sambucus racemosa v. melanocarpa Adoxaceae ____ Bulbil Onion Allium geyeri v. tenerum Amaryllidaceae ____ Tolmie's Onion Allium tolmiei v. tolmiei Amaryllidaceae ____ Gray’s Lovage Ligusticum grayi Apiaceae ____ Slender-fruited Lomatium Lomatium leptocarpum Apiaceae ____ Gray's Desert Parsley Lomatium papilioniferum ? Apiaceae ____ Common Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae ____ Western Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza occidentalis Apiaceae ____ Gairdner’s Yampah Perideridia gairdneri Apiaceae ____ Sierra Snakeroot Sanicula graveolens Apiaceae ____ Mountain Dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium Apocynaceae ____ False Solomon Seal Maianthemum racemosum ssp. amplexicauleAsparagaceae ____ Star-flowered False Solomon SealMaianthemum stellatum Asparagaceae ____ Hyacinth Cluster-lily Triteleia hyacinthina ? Asparagaceae ____ Yarrow Achillea millefolium Asteraceae ____ Pale Agoseris Agoseris glauca v. glauca Asteraceae ____ Sagebrush Agoseris Agoseris parviflora Asteraceae ____ Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea Asteraceae ____ Pussytoes Antenaria sp. Asteraceae ____ Woodrush Pussytoes Antennaria
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamiak Butte
    Checklist of Plants from Kamiak Butte (List alphabetical by genera within major groups) Ferns Cheilanthes gracillima lace lip-fern Cystopteris fragilis brittle bladder-fern Polypodium hesperium polypody Polystichum munitum swordfern Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern; brake fern Conifers Abies grandis grand fir Larix occidentalis western larch Pinus ponderosa ponderosa pine Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir Flowering plants Acer negundo box elder Achillea millefolium yarrow Agoseris heterophylla false dandelion Alyssum alyssoides alyssum Amelanchier alnifolia serviceberry Anaphalis margaritacea pearly-everlasting Anemone piperi windflower Antennaria luzuloides woodrush pussytoes Antennaria microphylla rosy pussytoes Antennaria racemosa raceme pussytoes Anthemis cotula mayweed, chamomile Apocynum androsaemifolium spreading dogbane Arabis sparsiflora sicklepod rockcress Arctostaphylos uva-ursi bearberry, kinnikinnik Arenaria congesta ballhead sandwort Arenaria microphylla bigleaf sandwort Arnica cordifolia heart-leaf arnica Artemisia absinthium wormwood Aster conspicuus showy aster Aster occidentalis western mountain aster Astragalus arrectus Palouse milkvetch Astragalus canadensis Canadian milkvetch Athysanus pusillus sandweed Balsamorhiza sagittata arrowleaf balsamroot Barbarea orthoceras American watercress Berberis repens creeping Oregon grape Besseya rubra red besseya Bromus brizaeformis rattlesnake grass Bromus carinatus California brome Bromus japonicus Japanese brome Bromus tectorum downy cheatgrass Bromus vulgaris Columbia brome
    [Show full text]
  • Plants, Volume 1, Number 1 (August 1979)
    Desert Plants, Volume 1, Number 1 (August 1979) Item Type Article Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 02/10/2021 01:18:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/528188 Volume I. Number 1. August 1979 Desert Published by The University of Arizona for the Plants Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum Assisting Nature with Plant Selection4 Larry K. Holzworth Aberrant Sex -Ratios in Jojoba Associated with Environmental Factors 8 Serena L. Cole 'J. G. Lemmon & Wife,' Plant Explorers in Arizona, California, and Nevada12 Frank S. Crosswhite 'Extinct' Wire -Lettuce, Stephanomeria schottii (Compositae), Rediscovered in Arizona after More Than One Hundred Years22 Elinor Lehto Southwestern Indian Sunflowers23 Gary Paul Nabhan Transition from a Bermudagrass Lawn to a Landscape of Rock or Gravel Mulch 27 Charles Sacamano Preliminary Evaluation of Cold- hardiness in Desert Landscaping Plants at Central Arizona College29 William A. Kinnison Effects of the 1978 Freeze on Native Plants of Sonora, Mexico33 Warren D. Jones The Severe Freeze of 1978 -79 in the Southwestern United States37 The National Climate Program Act of 197840 Reviews42 Arboretum Progress46 R. T. McKittrick Volume 1. Number 1. August 1979 Published by The University of Arizona Desert Plants for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum The Severe Freeze of 1978 -79 in the Contents Southwestern United States37 Correspondents: Editorial Barrie D. Coate, Saratoga Horticultural Foundation; Dara E. Emery, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden; Louis C. Assisting Nature with Plant Selection 4 Erickson, Botanic Gardens, University of California, River- Larry K. Holzworth, USDA Soil Conservation side; Wayne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Hoverfly Cheilosia Urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    USDA iiillllllllll United States Department of Field release of the hoverfly Agriculture Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Marketing and Regulatory Syrphidae) for biological Programs control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Field release of the hoverfly Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae) for biological control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]