DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Reports APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Reports Cultural Resources Study for the Fullerton College Facilities Master Plan Program EIR, City of Fullerton, Orange County, California Prepared for: North Orange County Community College District 1830A West Romneya Drive Anaheim, California 92801 Contact: Richard Williams, District Director Facilities Planning and Construction Prepared by: Sarah Corder, MFA; Samantha Murray, MA; Kara R. Dotter, MSHP; and Adriane Dorrler 38 North Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 AUGUST 2017 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Cultural Resources Study for the Fullerton College Facilities Master Plan Program EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................... IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ XI 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description.................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Facilities Master Plan Elements .................................................................. 2 1.3 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................ 21 1.3.1 Federal....................................................................................................... 22 1.3.2 State........................................................................................................... 23 1.3.3 Local ......................................................................................................... 27 2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH .......................................................................................31 2.1 CHRIS Records Search ......................................................................................... 31 2.1.1 Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies ................................... 31 2.1.2 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources .................................................. 33 2.2 Native American Coordination ............................................................................. 37 2.3 Building Development Research .......................................................................... 38 3 HISTORIC CONTEXT ...................................................................................................39 3.1 City of Fullerton Historical Overview .................................................................. 41 3.2 Fullerton College Historical Overview ................................................................. 43 3.2.1 Fullerton College Beginnings ................................................................... 43 3.2.2 The Great Depression and World War II .................................................. 44 3.2.3 Postwar Expansion on Campus ................................................................. 45 3.2.4 Politics and Social Change........................................................................ 47 3.2.5 Economic Uncertainty .............................................................................. 47 3.2.6 Diversity and Expansion ........................................................................... 48 3.3 Campus Development and Expansion .................................................................. 48 3.3.1 Original Campus Master Plan (1935–1942) ............................................. 48 3.3.2 Taylor and Conner’s Campus Expansion Master Plan (1953–1965)........ 58 3.3.3 Blurock’s Campus Expansion Projects (1965–1984) ............................... 69 3.3.4 Chapman and Wilshire School Acquisition (1980–1984) ........................ 72 3.3.5 Chapman Avenue Residential Acquisitions (1980s, 1990s) ..................... 76 9422.0001 iii August 2017 Cultural Resources Study for the Fullerton College Facilities Master Plan Program EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 3.4 Campus Architectural Styles................................................................................. 76 3.4.1 Spanish Colonial Revival (1915–1940) .................................................... 76 3.4.2 Craftsman (1905–1930) ............................................................................ 78 3.4.3 PWA/WPA Moderne (1933–1944)........................................................... 80 3.4.4 Mid-Century Modern (1933–1965) .......................................................... 80 3.4.5 New Formalism (1954–1970s) ................................................................. 82 3.4.6 International Style (c. 1925–present) ........................................................ 83 3.5 Campus Architects ................................................................................................ 84 3.5.1 Harry K. Vaughn (1882–1962) ................................................................. 84 3.5.2 Ralph D. Cornell (1890–1972) ................................................................. 85 3.5.3 Donald Beach Kirby, Architect (1905–1980) ........................................... 85 3.5.4 William Henry Taylor, Architect (1912–1995) ........................................ 86 3.5.5 William E. Blurock, Architect (1922–2012)............................................. 87 4 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY ..........................................................................89 4.1 Methods................................................................................................................. 89 4.2 Description of Surveyed Resources ...................................................................... 89 5 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ..............................................................................111 5.1 Fullerton Junior College Campus Historic District ............................................ 111 5.1.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 117 5.1.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 120 5.1.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 121 5.1.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 123 5.2 Mid-Century Modern Campus Expansion Historic District ............................... 124 5.2.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 127 5.2.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 130 5.2.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 131 5.2.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 132 5.3 Wilshire Junior High School Historic District .................................................... 133 5.3.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 134 5.3.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 138 5.3.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 138 5.3.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 140 5.4 325–327 North Newell Place .............................................................................. 141 5.4.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 141 9422.0001 iv August 2017 Cultural Resources Study for the Fullerton College Facilities Master Plan Program EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 5.4.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 143 5.4.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 144 5.4.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 145 5.5 420 East Chapman Avenue ................................................................................. 145 5.5.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 145 5.5.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 147 5.5.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 149 5.5.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 150 5.6 416 East Chapman Avenue ................................................................................. 150 5.6.1 NRHP/CRHR Evaluation Criteria .......................................................... 150 5.6.2 Local Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................ 152 5.6.3 Integrity Considerations .......................................................................... 154 5.6.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 154 5.7 418 East Chapman Avenue ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities
    -::, » . .• f Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish or Mexican Authorities Prepared by the Staff of the State Lands Commission ----- -- -·- PREFACE This report was prepared by Cris Perez under direction of Lou Shafer. There were three main reasons for its preparation. First, it provides a convenient reference to patent data used by staff Boundary Officers and others who may find the information helpful. Secondly, this report provides a background for newer members who may be unfamiliar with Spanish and Mexican land grants and the general circumstances surrounding the transfer of land from Mexican to American dominion. Lastly, it provides sources for additional reading for those who may wish to study further. The report has not been reviewed by the Executive Staff of the Commission and has not been approved by the State Lands Commission. If there are any questions regarding this report, direct them to Cris Perez or myself at the Office of the State Lands Commission, 1807 - 13th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. ROY MINNICK, Supervisor Boundary Investigation Unit 0401L VI TABLE OF CONTENlS Preface UI List of Maps x Introduction 1 Private Land Claims in California 2 Missions, Presidios, and Pueblos 7 Explanation of Terms Used in This Report 14 GRANTS OF LAND BY COUNTY AlamE:1da County 15 Amador County 19 Butte County 21 Calaveras County 23 Colusa County 25 Contra Costa County 27 Fresno County 31 Glenn County 33 Kern County 35 Kings County 39 Lake County 41 Los Angeles County 43 Marin County 53 Mariposa County 57 Mendocino County
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Architectural Theory Is the First Critical History of a Ma Architectural Thought Over the Last Forty Years
    a ND M a LLGR G OOD An Introduction to Architectural Theory is the first critical history of a ma architectural thought over the last forty years. Beginning with the VE cataclysmic social and political events of 1968, the authors survey N the criticisms of high modernism and its abiding evolution, the AN INTRODUCT rise of postmodern and poststructural theory, traditionalism, New Urbanism, critical regionalism, deconstruction, parametric design, minimalism, phenomenology, sustainability, and the implications of AN INTRODUCTiON TO new technologies for design. With a sharp and lively text, Mallgrave and Goodman explore issues in depth but not to the extent that they become inaccessible to beginning students. ARCHITECTURaL THEORY i HaRRY FRaNCiS MaLLGRaVE is a professor of architecture at Illinois Institute of ON TO 1968 TO THE PRESENT Technology, and has enjoyed a distinguished career as an award-winning scholar, translator, and editor. His most recent publications include Modern Architectural HaRRY FRaNCiS MaLLGRaVE aND DaViD GOODmaN Theory: A Historical Survey, 1673–1968 (2005), the two volumes of Architectural ARCHITECTUR Theory: An Anthology from Vitruvius to 2005 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2005–8, volume 2 with co-editor Christina Contandriopoulos), and The Architect’s Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010). DaViD GOODmaN is Studio Associate Professor of Architecture at Illinois Institute of Technology and is co-principal of R+D Studio. He has also taught architecture at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design and at Boston Architectural College. His work has appeared in the journal Log, in the anthology Chicago Architecture: Histories, Revisions, Alternatives, and in the Northwestern University Press publication Walter Netsch: A Critical Appreciation and Sourcebook.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019, Volume 65, Number 2
    The Journal of The Journal of SanSan DiegoDiego HistoryHistory The Journal of San Diego History The San Diego History Center, founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928, has always been the catalyst for the preservation and promotion of the history of the San Diego region. The San Diego History Center makes history interesting and fun and seeks to engage audiences of all ages in connecting the past to the present and to set the stage for where our community is headed in the future. The organization operates museums in two National Historic Districts, the San Diego History Center and Research Archives in Balboa Park, and the Junípero Serra Museum in Presidio Park. The History Center is a lifelong learning center for all members of the community, providing outstanding educational programs for schoolchildren and popular programs for families and adults. The Research Archives serves residents, scholars, students, and researchers onsite and online. With its rich historical content, archived material, and online photo gallery, the San Diego History Center’s website is used by more than 1 million visitors annually. The San Diego History Center is a Smithsonian Affiliate and one of the oldest and largest historical organizations on the West Coast. Front Cover: Illustration by contemporary artist Gene Locklear of Kumeyaay observing the settlement on Presidio Hill, c. 1770. Back Cover: View of Presidio Hill looking southwest, c. 1874 (SDHC #11675-2). Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Copy Edits: Samantha Alberts Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life.
    [Show full text]
  • OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES
    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT A. Torrance and Garden City Movement: The plan for the original City of Torrance, known as the Olmsted Tract, owes its origins to a movement that begin in England in the late 19th Century. Sir Ebenezer Howard published his manifesto “Garden Cities of To-morrow" in 1898 where he describes a utopian city in which man lives harmoniously together with the rest of nature. The London suburbs of Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City were the first built examples of garden city planning and became a model for urban planners in America. In 1899 Ebenezer founded the Garden City Association to promote his idea for the Garden City ‘in which all the advantages of the most energetic town life would be secured in perfect combination with all the beauty and delight of the country.” His notions about the integration of nature with town planning had profound influence on the design of cities and the modern suburb in the 20th Century. Examples of Garden City Plans in America include: Forest Hills Gardens, New York (by Fredrick Law Olmsted Jr.); Radburn, New Jersey; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Baldwin Hills Village, in Los Angeles, California and Greenbelt, Maryland. Fredrick Law Olmsted is considered to be the father of the landscape architecture profession in America. He had two sons that inherited his legacy and firm. They practiced as the Olmsted Brothers of Brookline Massachusetts. Fredrick Law Olmsted Junior was a founding member of The National Planning Institute of America and was its President from 1910 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Backgrounds of Range Land Use in California
    While accounts of contemporary Historical Backgrounds of Range Land Use travelers are of great value in giv- ing us an appraisal of the general in California nature of the forage cover at the time California was being settled L. T. BURCHAM they afford few details of its bo- Senior Forest Technician, Ccrlifomia Division of Forestry, tanical composition or floristic Sawamento, California. characteristics. It is to early bo- tanical collections that we must In the year 1769 a group of Pedro Fages said: “For flocks and turn for these details. They range Spaniards was riding northward herds there are excellent places all the way from fragmentary col- from San Diego, through the Coast with plenty of water and abun- lections such as those of the Ranges, in search of the Port of dance of pasture” (Fages, 1937). Beechey voyage to the more com- Monterey. Members of that party, At San Luis Obispo, he wrote, prehensive work of the Pacific an expedition led by Don Gaspar “Abundant water is found in every railroad surveys (Hooker and Ar- de Portola, were the first Euro- direction, and pasture for the cat- nott, 1841; Torrey, 1856). In a peans to gain any extensive, accu- tle, so that no matter how large sense early plant collections are rate knowledge of California. On the mission grows to be . the quite disappointing to a range Tuesday, July 18, 1769, one of land promises sustenance” (Fages, man. They were made almost these men, Miguel Costanso, wrote : 1937). But perhaps none of these wholly to serve taxonomic or other “The place where we halted was accounts excelled the simple elo- special purposes; they are chiefly exceedingly beautiful and pleasant, quence of Fray Juan Crespi, who records of occurrence, yielding but a valley remarkable for its size, wrote : “There is much land and meager information as to relative adorned with groves of trees, and good pasture” (Engelhardt, 1920), abundance and area1 distribution covered with the finest pasture .
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Subdivision of South Park
    The Historic 8ubdivision of oouth Park J! :l .~~ ,..., ,, ...,,,.,., -:'/ / · ~ ,_•·s=D:.......__ _....:::::~~~;;;;;_~-'// ., illi .\ ; fl \.-~-·.t ?,·(~;.....•~;::-•. :~'~t;~" ··... =-··· . ~ . ~u~c~·r:s~l,!'..,,. \~ ~< -~-~ :~)--~r-~~tJ!Ff.~~-=-/ . ~\'·i?., ~-~~/,,: P.O. Box 3571 ~-.:..- . ~;:ch~+",;, ~> -, ' ' ,,-~~~1~r~_ ;&~ ~i1 · l'.: San Diego , California 92163 ·4· ·;4, l! f'7 '/ ; "i . t:. ..; ' -~-:t.. (619) 297-9327 -"--h ,.:l.: l .J ·, • ·. ~ ' ~~~L~~:~ --~~i¥';".:·~r~f!":-·-~ 1 :; ......J. -._.- ...-... .,... .lp- ~-~-~~.2.i.. - - . ---· :.. '~~~~ - ~ ~~} ~ave Our tteril88e Or(janisalion &OliO presents The llisloric8ubdivision of 8outh Park A selected lislin8 of Iiislorically and Archileclurally &i8niftcanl liomes in cooperalion with ooulh Park Maintenance and E>eautificalionCommillee a commillee of the Grealer Golden !iii! Community Developmenl Corporation with support of a 8ranl from the Cily of &n Die8o Commissionof Arls 0 Cullure Table of Contents Foreword .................... ....................... ................................. ............ 1 South Park, San Diego, California .............................. ................ .. 2 Builders and Architects .................... .................... .......................... 3 The Historic Subdivision of South Park ........................... .......... .. 6 Our cover is reproduced from an article on South Park homes printed in the San Diego Union, January 1, 1912. ii iii foreword by Suzanne Lawrence President of SOHO For over twenty-three years Save Our Heritage Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Assessment 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed-Use Project Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for City of Burbank 150 North Third Street Burbank, California 91502 Contact: Daniel Villa, Senior Planner prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 August 2020 Please cite this report as follows: Madsen, A., M. Strother, B. Campbell-King, S. Treffers, and S. Carmack 2020 Cultural Resources Assessment for the 3700 Riverside Drive Mixed Use Project, City of Burbank, Los Angeles County, California. Rincon Consultants Project No. 19-08998. Report on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton. Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ............................................................................. 1 Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains ................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location and Description ........................................................................................ 3 Personnel ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture As Environmental Medicine
    188 84lH ACSA ANNUAL MEETING DESlGNlDESlGN STUDIO 1996 Architecture as Environmental Medicine PHILLIP G.MEAD Newschool of Architecture INTRODUCTION under Caesar Augustus, because a portion of his book The Ten Books on Architecture is devoted in depth to military breach- What is the practice of architecture? How does the public ing machines and fortification design. perceive what we do and how does that differ from the way Vitruvius, as a military engineer, was essentially a castle we view ourselves? Are we artists whose ultimate goal is to maker; thus his thinking was protective in nature. Architects express the "spirit of the age" or are we plan coordinators who add a touch of zeitgeist here and there for effect. As are, in a way, castle makers who provide protection from the creators concerned with the influence buildings and land- elements, casualties, and criminal activities. Shelter, our scapes have on the public's well being and as licensed primary form of protection, is a form of preventative medi- professionals sworn to secure the health, safety and welfare cine. Likewise our skin protects our bodies from countless of the public, it's time to acknowledge a part of us that we numbers of parasitic viruses and germs. But Vitruvius' have failed to recognize or promote, that of "environmental thdung wasn't limited to protection alone; it also included physicians." Our history is rich with medical associations. ideas of sustainability (not the kind of sustainability that The first recorded architect,Irnhotep (designer ofbgZoser's focuses on responsible ecological energy production and pyramid) was also aphysician who after his death became the consumption, but sustainability as biological nourishment).
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Jour nal of Volume 56 Winter/Spring 2010 Numbers 1 & 2 • The Journal of San Diego History San Diego History 1. Joshua Sweeney 12. Ellen Warren Scripps 22. George Washington 31. Florence May Scripps 2. Julia Scripps Booth Scripps Kellogg (Mrs. James M.) 13. Catherine Elizabeth 23. Winifred Scripps Ellis 32. Ernest O’Hearn Scripps 3. James S. Booth Scripps Southwick (Mrs. G.O.) 33. Ambrosia Scripps 4. Ellen Browning Scripps (Mrs. William D.) 24. William A. Scripps (Mrs. William A.) 5. Howard “Ernie” Scripps 14. Sarah Clarke Scripps 25. Anna Adelaide Scripps 34. Georgie Scripps, son 6. James E. Scripps (Mrs. George W.) (Mrs. George C.) of Anna and George C. 7. William E. Scripps 15. James Scripps Southwick 26. Baby of Anna and Scripps 8. Harriet Messinger 16. Jesse Scripps Weiss George C. Scripps 35. Hans Bagby Scripps (Mrs. James E.) 17. Grace Messinger Scripps 27. George H. Scripps 36. Elizabeth Sweeney 9. Anna Scripps Whitcomb 18. Sarah Adele Scripps 28. Harry Scripps (London, (Mrs. John S., Sr.) (Mrs. Edgar B.) 19. Jessie Adelaide Scripps England) 37. John S. Sweeney, Jr. 10. George G. Booth 20. George C. Scripps 29. Frederick W. Kellogg 38. John S. Sweeney, Sr. 11. Grace Ellen Booth 21. Helen Marjorie 30. Linnie Scripps (Mrs. 39. Mary Margaret Sweeney Wallace Southwick Ernest) Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation
    Golden HHI Planned District Historic Preservation Study and Evaluation Prepared for the City of San Diego Planning Department and Historical Site Board by CIANI AND SOMERVILLE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Architectural and Historic Preservation Consultants La Jolla, California April, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUMEl 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology 2 3. Historical Background 15 4. Evaluation 24 5. Recommendations and Conclusions 31 6. List of Maps 35 1. Bibliography and References 36 8. Acknowledgements 40 it CONTENTS OF VOLUME II HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY Russ Blvd. B Street Broadway A Street C Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME III HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY E Street Avenido Cerro Gordo 20th Street F Street Treat Street 21st Street Glendale Ave. 19th Street CONTENTS OF VOLUME IV HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY 22nd Street 25th Street 28th Street 23rd Street 26th Street 24th Street 27th Street iii Vicinity k c.., .,K 'l: \[\ C; 'N '" ~ ~ '"II) corcmado GOLDEN HILL PLANNED DISTRICT jv 1 Introduction TIlerefore, our review of the cultural context is a summary of work by others, and is provided TIlis survey has been conducted for the City of San as an overview of the social history of the Diego Planning Department and the community of greater Golden Hill area. Golden Hill, with special consideration for the perceived goal of producing a canprehensive evalua­ TIlis study of the Planned District provides tion and documentation of all cultural resources an assessment of the architectural styles and located within the Golden Hill Planned District. periods of the survey area, and an evaluation TIle canpletion of this survey brings the community of significance arrong the surveyed sites, objects, a step closer to irrplerrenting the goals of the and structures.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
    The Journal of Volume 56 Summer 2010 Number 3 • The Number Journal of San Diego History 56 Summer 2010 Volume San Diego History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; PRESERVE A SAN DIEGO TREASURE membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Your $100 contribution will help to create an endowment for Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The Journal of San Diego History The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American Please make your check payable to The San Diego Foundation. Indicate on National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed the bottom of your check that your donation is for The Journal of San Diego Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. History Fund. The San Diego Foundation accepts contributions of $100 and up. Your contribution is tax-deductible. The San Diego Foundation 2508 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92106 (619) 235-2300 or (858) 385-1595 [email protected] Cover: Earliest known sketch from the perspective of Presidio Hill showing the presidio ruins, Mission Valley, the San Diego River emptying into San Diego Bay, Old Town, and Point Loma drawn by William Birch McMurtrie, artist on board the U.S.
    [Show full text]