The Chiastic Structure of Matthew 17:14–20:34
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi ISSN: (Online) 2305-0853, (Print) 1018-6441 Page 1 of 9 Original Research Between the Mount of Transfiguration and Jerusalem and beyond: The chiastic structure of Matthew 17:14–20:34 Author: In this article, a chiastic structure in Matthew 17:14–20:34 is identified, evaluated and discussed. 1 Jacob J. Scholtz This structure highlights the movements of Jesus between the Mount of Transfiguration and Affiliation: Jerusalem as he is on his way to the cross to provide forgiveness of sins. However, this chiastic 1Discipline Group Old and structure may also be considered in its wider, prophetic context. The structure of Matthew New Testament, Faculty of 17:14–20:34 fits into the larger thought or movement of Matthew 16:28–25:46. This shows Jesus’ Theology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa movements from the Mount of Transfiguration to Jerusalem and beyond — not only during his first advent, but also at his second coming. Corresponding author: Jacob Scholtz, [email protected] Introduction Dates: Received: 23 Oct. 2016 Using different organising principles to analyse a text such as the Gospel of Matthew will plausibly Accepted: 06 Mar. 2017 result in the identification of different structures for the same passage. From a structuring perspective, Published: 09 May 2017 however, Matthew 16–20 (or parts thereof) is in a class of its own, especially regarding the boundaries 1 How to cite this article: of this section. Does a new section start at 16:13 or at 16:21 and, if so, does it extend to 17:27, to 19:1, Scholtz, J.J., 2017, ‘Between or perhaps even as far as 20:34? Or should 13:53–17:27 rather be viewed as a long narrative section, the Mount of Transfiguration followed by a discourse in 18:1–35 and then by a narrative extending to 20:34, or to 22:46 or perhaps and Jerusalem and beyond: The chiastic structure of even as far as 23:39? Few other passages elicit as many different views regarding its structure as Matthew 17:14–20:34’, In die Matthew 16–20 (or parts thereof) does. Table 1 presents at least seven different ways, based on Skriflig 51(1), a2211. https:// various theories about its structure, in which this passage could be depicted. doi.org/10.4102/ids. v51i1.2211 Not all analyses of text structure are the result of an overarching organising principle. Some Copyright: topical studies focus on the structuring of the contents of individual sections without necessarily © 2017. The Authors. stating how such sections or their structure fit into the larger thought or movement of Matthew’s Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Gospel as a whole (cf. Bauer 1988:11). For example, and relevant to Matthew 16–20, McClister Creative Commons (1996:549–558) sees a chiastic structure in 17:22–20:19, but does not say how this links up with the Attribution License. surrounding chapters of Matthew or the Gospel as a whole. Be that as it may, all these different structuring proposals clearly show that the first criterion of Blomberg (1989:5) for detecting an extended chiasmus has been met, as there is ‘a problem in perceiving the structure of the text in question, which more conventional outlines fail to resolve’. The first purpose of this article is to identify, evaluate and briefly discuss a chiastic structure in 17:14–20:34. The second purpose is to show how this chiastic structure fits into the larger thought or movement of 16:28–25:46. This may, perhaps, help to identify an overarching structuring principle. A chiastic structure in Matthew 17:14–20:34 identified and evaluated After being declared God’s unique Son, and having again veiled his glory (cf. 17:1–13), Jesus moves down the Mount of Transfiguration and towards Jerusalem, where he will be betrayed, suffer, die and be resurrected on the third day, ‘thus establishing a pattern of humility for his followers’ (Carson 1995:395).2 Between the glorious transfiguration and ultimate glory in Read online: Jerusalem lies a path of suffering, humility and service, but, finally, rewards in the Kingdom. Scan this QR code with your That 17:14–20:34 can be viewed as a rhetorical unit is evidenced by two miracles that smart phone or mobile device 1.References to Matthew will be indicated only by chapter and verse numbers. to read online. 2.The glory of the Son of God was veiled at his incarnation and again on the Mount of Transfiguration. http://www.indieskriflig.org.za Open Access Page 2 of 9 Original Research Table 1: The implications of different organising principles for the structure of Matthew 16–20. Organising principle Key Proponents Implications for the structure of Matthew 16–20 (or parts thereof) Narrative-plot outline ‘From that time Jesus began’ (Ἀπὸ τότε Kingsbury (1975:1–37), Bauer (1988:97) 16:21–20:34 ἤρξατο ὁ Ἰησοῦς – 4:17; 16:21) Markan and/or geographical approach Overall plan of Mark and/or geographical France (2007:xii–xiii, 2–5) 16:21–20:34; movement or Morris (1992:vii–viii) 13:53–18:35 & 19:1–20:34 Narrative–discourse outline ‘When Jesus had finished’ (Καὶ ἐγένετο ὅτε Toussaint (1980:24–30) 13:54–16:12; 16:13–19:2; & 19:3–20:34; ἐτέλεσεν ὁ Ἰησοῦς, 7:28; 11:1; 13:53; 19:1; 26:1) or Carson (1995:51, 55), Turner (2008:8–10) 13:53–17:27; 18:1–19:2 & 19:3–23:39 Chiastic structure Large-scale chiasmus using the narrative- Ellis (1974:viii–ix), 13:53–17:27; 18:1–35; & 19:1–22:46; or discourse sequence Combrink (1983:71), 16:21–20:34; or Derickson (2006:426) 13:53–17:27; 18:1–35; & 19:1–23:39 Other: a) Combination of approaches Narrative-plot and narrative-discourse Blomberg (1992:24–25) 16:21–17:27; 18:1–35; & 19:1–22:46 b) Rhetorical/Pesher Ten citations of Isaiah as thematic cores Patrick (2010:43, 71–72) 14:1–16:12; 16:13–21:11 c) Greek drama Prologue, parodos, 5 episodes and epode McCuistion (2013:39) 13:54–17:27; 18:1–35; & 19:1-25:46 A. Rebuke and mercy: healing of demoniac 17:14–18 B. Private instrucon to disciples: faith, praying, fasng 17:19–20[21] C. Jesus foretells his death and resurrecon 17:22–23 D. Sons of the king and the temple tax 17:24–27 E. Entering the kingdom: humility and greatness 18:1–4 F. Stumbling blocks 18:5–9 G. Despise no lile one (parable) 18:10–14 H. Binding and loosing 18:15–20 I. Forgiveness and healing (parable) 18:21–19:2 H'. Binding and loosing 19:3–12 G'. Forbid no lile one 19:13–15 F'. Stumbling block (possessions) 19:16–22 E'. Entering the kingdom: possible only with God 19:23–26 D'. Labourers of the owner of the vineyard (parable) 19:27–20:16 C'. Jesus foretells his death and resurrecon 20:17–19 B'. Private instrucon to disciples: suffering, serving, ruling 20:20–28 A'. Rebuke and mercy: healing of two blind men 20:29–34 FIGURE 1: The chiastic structure in Matthew 17:14–20:34. serve as inclusios, namely a Messianic miracle at the The chiastic structure start of this section and another specific miracle that Based on the perceived parallel passages (to be discussed Jesus performed at the end of it (17:14–18; 20:29–34; later), the chiastic structure (or rhetorical arrangement) that cf. 19:2).3 The rhetorical situation is marked by, first, the has been identified is shown in Figure 1. journey motif or travelogue with movement down from the Mount of Transfiguration before going up to Jerusalem, together with other geographical markers (17:22, 24; 19:1; Evaluation of the chiastic structure 20:17, 29); second, explicit predictions by Jesus of his To a person with a chiastic hammer, everything looks like a death and resurrection (17:22–23; 20:17–19); third, various parallel nail. How can one avoid ‘imagining chiasmus where incidents about humility and being reconciled (or not) to it was never intended’? (Blomberg 1989:5). As noted in the God or fellow believers through forgiveness (18:1–4; introduction, the first of nine criteria identified by Blomberg 18:5–9; 18:10–14; 18:15–20; 18:21–19:2; 19:3–12; 19:13–15; (1989) has been met, but the remaining eight criteria are used 19:16–22; 19:23–26); and fourth, references to greatness, to evaluate the identified chiastic structure: rewards and authority in the Kingdom (17:19–20[21]; (2) There must be clear examples of parallelism between the two 18:1–4; 19:27–20:16; 20:20–28). ’halves‘ of the hypothesized chiasmus ... (3) Verbal (or grammatical) parallelism as well as conceptual (or structural) 3.Fruchtenbaum (2016:143–155) highlights three miracles performed by Jesus that were ‘different from anything else that had ever been performed’, namely the parallelism should characterize most if not all of the corresponding healing of a Jewish leper (8:2–4), the casting out of a demon that causes muteness (12:22–45; cf. [17:21]) and the healing of persons born blind (Jn 9:1–41). The pairs of subdivisions. ... (4) The verbal parallelism should involve Jews of that time held that these miracles could only be performed by the central or dominant imagery or terminology, not peripheral or Messiah, hence they are called ‘Messianic miracles’ (cf.