DOCSLIB.ORG

A Vision of Humanity United

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Vision of Humanity United Vol 457|12 February 2009 BOOKS & ARTS Darwin and his family would have celebrated the end of colonial slavery, depicted in this 1834 illustration. BODLEIAN LIBRARY OXFORD/THE ART ARCHIVE ARCHIVE ART OXFORD/THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY A vision of humanity united A controversial new reconstruction of Charles Darwin’s life suggests his family’s campaign against slavery influenced his belief that all humans evolved from a single ancestor, explains W. F. Bynum. Lewis Carroll wrote of this new reading of Darwin’s life and values. of Researches, later known as Voyage of the a mythical island whose They will not be disappointed. In Darwin’s Beagle, without realizing how much human inhabitants made a pre- Sacred Cause, Desmond and Moore assimilate slavery affected his sensitivities. He feared carious living by taking in the relevant secondary literature, but also go that his book might be censored in the United each other’s laundry. Most much further. They offer us a new reading of States, where slavery was a major political and books on Charles Darwin Darwin’s life and scientific work, based on two economic issue. in his bicentennial year well-known facts about him: he felt physical Desmond and Moore have reconstructed will probably follow suit, repackaging what a revulsion when con- Darwin’s life and sci- troop of Darwin scholars have uncovered from fronted by cruelty and Darwin’s Sacred Cause: Race, Slavery and ence through the his extensive archives and writings. The more he loathed slavery. the Quest for Human Origins lenses of these two books that have been written on a subject, the Darwin’s hasty exit by Adrian Desmond and James Moore themes. This approach easier it seems to be to write a new one. But from the surgical thea- Allen Lane/Houghton Mifflin: 2009. has many pay-offs. Darwin’s Sacred Cause is an exception. tre, while a student in 512 pp/448 pp. £25/$30 First, it enlarges our Readers of Adrian Desmond and James Edinburgh, is a classic knowledge of Dar- Moore’s earlier biography, Darwin (Michael anecdote of his early years. Even necessary win’s circle. He came from a family with ardent Joseph, 1991) — and of Desmond’s subsequent pain, such as that caused by operations before anti- slavery sentiments. Darwin’s grandfather, Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High anaesthetics were available, was more than he Josiah Wedgwood, produced the most power- Priest (Penguin, 1998) — will expect much from could bear. And no one can read his Journal ful image of the British anti-slavery campaign: 792 © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved NATURE|Vol 457|12 February 2009 DARWIN 200 OPINION a jasperware medallion of 1787, depicting a Darwin certainly owned and read carefully of the two men were famously presented slave in chains, which bore the motto ‘Am I many of Prichard’s books, especially his together at a meeting of the Linnean Society in not a Man and a Brother?’ (pictured, right). Researches into the Physical History of Man- 1859. The authors provide good evidence for Darwin’s sisters, aunts, uncles and cousins all kind, a monumental work of erudition that was this, although there is rather more on sexual wholeheartedly supported the ‘sacred cause’ transmuted from his University of Edinburgh selection in the first edition of On the Origin of with their energies and their money. The MD thesis (1808) to a single volume (1813), Species than the uninitiated reader would con- authors mine correspondence, pamphlets and and finally, in its last incarnation, into a five- clude from Darwin’s Sacred Cause. monetary contributions to dissect this fam- volume encyclopaedic compendium of biology, ily concern in a detail never before achieved, linguistics, ethnology and physical anthropol- Back to his roots and demonstrate convincingly that Darwin ogy. Prichard was a Quaker-turned-Evangelical The ‘analogy of nature’ presupposes that all absorbed these family values. Anglican, and certainly no evolutionist. Never- domestic plants and animals — humans as well This concentration on Darwin’s abiding belief theless, he was an ardent believer in the unity as pigeons, dogs and sheep — are varieties of in the unity of the human races, in the wake of of mankind, marshalling all the evidence he a single original species. Prichard assumed it a rising tide of polygenism — the belief that could that all human races were derived from was true, and Darwin strove manfully to fol- humans were divided into different races with a single stock. Prichard invoked what he low in his footsteps. Darwin’s researches separate origins — encourages us to rethink called the ‘analogy of nature’, by on pigeons were a tour de force, his relationships with his acquaintances and which he meant that humans, and never written about with colleagues. The doughty Harriet Martineau, similar to domestic animals more force than here. The his brother Erasmus’s friend, becomes not (dogs, sheep, cattle), vary case for dogs was more just a source of Malthusian commentary, but far more than species complicated, and his an ardent critic of the iniquities of American in the wild. Man- conclusion, in On the slavery, based on first-hand experience during kind, like the dog, is Origin of Species, that a long visit to the United States. Darwin’s com- domesticated, and our domestic dogs plex association with Charles Lyell is shown therefore capable of are descended from to have very deep and complicated roots. We wide variation. more than one spe- know that Darwin was extremely disappointed Given the impor- cies, was a problem with Lyell’s reception of On the Origin of Species. tance Darwin placed — especially given Desmond and Moore dissect correspondence on domestication as the importance of his during Lyell’s first two trips to North America, a model of biological notion of descent with where the patrician geologist was wined and variation, the symmetry variation. On Desmond dined by aristocratic slaveholders in the Ameri- of their arguments is stark. and Moore’s reading of can South. Their analysis of these years in the Darwin noted at the back of his values, with its commit- 1840s is both amusing and moving, as Darwin one of his volumes of Prichard, ment to human unity, dogs goaded Lyell to see beyond the polite trappings ‘How like my Book all this will be’. presented a real difficulty. of southern society to the harsh realities on The comment is famous and has been var- The natural culmination of this vol- which it was based. iously interpreted by historians. Desmond and ume is Darwin’s Descent of Man and Selection Moore argue that Darwin intended his treat- in Relation to Sex (Murray, 1871). Desmond A personal evolution ment of human variation, albeit within an evo- and Moore reinforce their point that Dar- LIBRARY GALLERIES, UK/BRIDGEMAN ART HOUSE, HULL CITY MUSEUMS AND ART WILBERFORCE Desmond and Moore also invite us to recon- lutionary context, to read much like Prichard’s. win’s concern with sexual selection had some sider Darwin’s attitude to the naturalist Louis The extensive documentation contained in their of its origins in his abiding belief in the fun- Agassiz. His rejection of Darwin’s central mes- book makes this interpretation plausible. Cer- damental unity of the human races, but even sage in On the Origin of Species is well known, tainly Darwin found in his ethnological reading these authors cannot rehabilitate Darwin’s but we can now see the deep roots of Darwin’s much appeal to the ‘analogy of nature’ among disappointing discussion of human descent. antipathy to this Harvard apostle of polygenism, those wanting to account for human variation as During the 1850s and 1860s, evidence for who wrote an introduction to the most promi- being on a par with the variation still produced the antiquity and early history of humans nent racist tract in antebellum America, Types among domestic animals. had been established. Too many of Darwin’s of Mankind by J. C. Nott and G. R. Gliddon Prichard argued that skin colour varies with leading ideas were still grounded in his own (1854). According to Desmond and Moore, the degree of ‘civilization’, and proposed that amazingly creative period in the late 1830s. Darwin canvassed first the zoologist James Adam was black. He also had a notion of sexual After On the Origin of Species, much of Dar- Dana at Yale, and then, when Dana proved too selection, whereby ideas of beauty, different in win’s innovative research was in botany; it is much in Agassiz’s shadow, the botanist Asa specific cultural contexts, would have reinforced as if he wanted most of all simply to be in his Gray at Harvard, to act as his undercover agent racial variations. Darwin, too, in Desmond and own garden. ■ in Agassiz’s America. They argue that Agassiz’s Moore’s account, saw sexual selection as the W. F. Bynum is emeritus professor of the history polygenism, rather than his espousal of con- key to varieties of mankind. They suggest that of medicine at University College London, Gower tinental, idealist modes of thinking, was what Darwin abandoned a chapter on the races of Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. He is author of The Darwin found especially odious. man in his planned book on natural selection History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction and This account of Darwin’s personal evolu- because he felt he needed more information editor of a new edition of On the Origin of Species. tion also alters the focus on the important on sexual selection. In the event, the planned e-mail: [email protected] influences on his thinking.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Article Full Text PDF (646KB)
    BOOK REVIEWS ism was condemned by a Friend in "his denunciation of the Church's 'adulterous connection' with the state." He "abominated the 'fornicating' Church, indicting it for the The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, 'filthy crime of adultery' with aristocratic government, and Reform in Radical London. Adrian Desmond. which had left it with the 'stigma of disgrace' to degenerate 1989. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. into 'an inflictor of misery... a destroyer of moral principle 503 p. $34.95 cloth. ... a subverter of the good order of society.'" Desmond focuses our attention midway between the In a counterattack, the conservative scientists avowed French Revolution and the appearance of Darwin's Origin "that the new crop of foul fruits being harvested in Britain, of Species, the score of years around 1830. He describes the treason, blasphemy, and riots, was the result of a diseased political, social, and scientific ferment in radical London 'speculative science' spawned by the French Revolution." that fueled an evolving appreciation of natural law rather The radicals were accused of "inciting the working classes." than divine creation to explain the what, when, why, and There were to be "fatal consequences of an atheistic self- how of the living world. Signs of its emergence appeared developing nature for the authority of kings and priests." "when the first wave of Scottish students arrived in Paris The Radicals as physiologists "explained higher organic after Waterloo" around 1820 where "they found Jean- wholes by their physico-chemical constituents, while as Baptiste Lamarck, at seventy-one, tetchy, pessimistic, and democrats they saw political constituents, voters, em- losing his sight." A more liberal medical education was powered to sanction a higher authority: a delegate to act available in Roman Catholic France than in Calvinistic in their interest." Organisms derived their existence by Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing the Dinosaur: Richard Owen's Response to Robert Edmond Grant Author(S): Adrian J
    Designing the Dinosaur: Richard Owen's Response to Robert Edmond Grant Author(s): Adrian J. Desmond Source: Isis, Vol. 70, No. 2 (Jun., 1979), pp. 224-234 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/230789 . Accessed: 16/10/2013 13:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 150.135.115.18 on Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:00:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Designing the Dinosaur: Richard Owen's Response to Robert Edmond Grant By Adrian J. Desmond* I N THEIR PAPER on "The Earliest Discoveries of Dinosaurs" Justin Delair and William Sarjeant permit Richard Owen to step in at the last moment and cap two decades of frenzied fossil collecting with the word "dinosaur."' This approach, I believe, denies Owen's real achievement while leaving a less than fair impression of the creative aspect of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Address Commemorating Darwin
    Presidential Address Commemorating Darwin The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Browne, Janet. 2005. Presidential address commemorating Darwin. The British Journal for the History of Science 38, no. 3: 251-274. Published Version 10.1017/S0007087405006977 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3345924 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA BJHS 38(3): 251–274, September 2005. f British Society for the History of Science doi:10.1017/S0007087405006977 Presidential address Commemorating Darwin JANET BROWNE* Abstract. This text draws attention to former ideologies of the scientific hero in order to explore the leading features of Charles Darwin’s fame, both during his lifetime and beyond. Emphasis is laid on the material record of celebrity, including popular mementoes, statues and visual images. Darwin’s funeral in Westminster Abbey and the main commemorations and centenary celebrations, as well as the opening of Down House as a museum in 1929, are discussed and the changing agendas behind each event outlined. It is proposed that common- place assumptions about Darwin’s commitment to evidence, his impartiality and hard work contributed substantially to his rise to celebrity in the emerging domain of professional science in Britain. During the last decade a growing number of historians have begun to look again at the phenomena of scientific commemoration and the cultural processes that may be involved when scientists are transformed into international icons.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet Browne
    Janet Browne 1. Personal details Janet Elizabeth Bell Browne History of Science Department Harvard University Science Center 371 1 Oxford Street Cambridge MA 02138, USA Tel: 001-617-495-3550 Email: [email protected] 2. Education and degrees B.A.(Mod) Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, 1972. M.Sc. History of Science, Imperial College, London, 1973. Ph.D. History of Science, Imperial College, London, 1978, “Charles Darwin and Joseph Dalton Hooker: studies in the history of biogeography”. (Keddey-Fletcher Warr Scholarship of the University of London, 1975-78; British Academy 3 year PhD studentship) MA (Hon) Harvard University, 2006 Honorary DSc Trinity College Dublin, 2009 3. Professional History 1978--79, Visiting researcher, History of Science Department, Harvard University. 1979--80, Wellcome Fellow, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London. 1980--83, Research Assistant (3 year staff appointment), Wellcome Institute/ University College, London. 1983--91, Associate Editor of Correspondence of Charles Darwin and Senior Research Associate, Cambridge University Library (1990--91). 1983--93, Part-time Lecturer, MSc History of Science, UCL/Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London. 1 1993, Lecturer in History of Biology, Wellcome Centre for the History of Medicine, London. 1996, Reader in History of Biology, University College London. 1996-7, Senior Visiting Research Fellow King’s College Cambridge (stipendiary, by open competition). 2002, Professor in the History of Biology, University College London. 2006- present Aramont Professor in the History of Science, Harvard University 2008- 12 Senior Research Editor USA, Darwin Correspondence Project 2009-14 Harvard College Professor (for excellence in undergraduate teaching) 2009 Assistant chair, Department History of Science, Harvard University, 2010- Chair, Department History of Science, Harvard University 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Darwin Industry H
    Ubs 0 THE DARWIN INDUSTRY H MAURAC. FLANNERY,DEPARTMENT EDITOR 0 0- I 'vejust finished reading CharlesDarwin: The Power these circumstances,it's not surprising that it doesn't Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/68/3/163/53566/4451956.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 of Place, the second volume of Janet Browne's (2002) have the depth of Browne'swork. 0 biography of Darwin, and what strikes me is how There were seven years between the publication of Browne manages to make his story fresh and gripping the two volumes, and the intense researchBrowne did even though the basic facts are well-known, at least to is evident. For example, she gives a thorough descrip- biologists. I had heard raves about the first volume, tion of the reviews of Originof Species(1859) after its CharlesDarwin: Voyaging(1995), but I put off readingit publication.There were over 300 of them, so this is not for a long time, because like its successor, it is well over an insignificant task. Also, she puts these articles into 500 pages long. Did I really want to devote that much the context of Victorianpublication trends. The reviews Ii time and brain power, even to Darwin?After all, I had were numerous because there was obviously great read Adrian Desmond and James Moore's (1991) interest in the book, but also because there had been a Darwin. Admittedly,it was a one-volumebiography, but proliferationof journals at this time due to improve- it did run to more than 700 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does Science Say About Race? by Sara Joan Miles, Ph.D
    What Does Science Say About Race? By Sara Joan Miles, Ph.D. Observant of public behavior and attentive to public discourse over recent years, I have particularly noted two areas of conflict: (1) the value of science and (2) the concept of race. This leads me to believe that PASTCF members would be interested in and helped by having an historical perspective and discussion of current ways science regards race. As an historian of science, I have studied how ideologies and cultural attitudes have influenced scientific thought through the years. I have learned that aspects of these views often remain with us, and we need to understand how old ideas can still influence current thinking. Writing about ancient Greek and Roman thinkers, Denise Eileen McCoskey stated, “[They] did not consider human biology or skin color the source of racial identity, although the belief that human variation was determined by the environment or climate persisted throughout antiquity. Ancient ethnographic writing provides insight into ancient racial thought and stereotypes in both the Greek and Roman periods. Race in the Greek world centered in large part around the emergence of the category of Greek alongside that of barbarian.”1 In those cultures, the idea of race was based on how civilized they were, i.e., how much they behaved and acted and valued things like we do. Many ancient thinkers believed that physical differences were simply due to geography and climate. By the Middle Ages, this classical idea was joined to an interpretation of the role of Noah’s three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth in the biblical narrative of Genesis 9-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Sede Amministrativa: Università Degli Studi Di Padova Dipartimento Di Filosofia
    Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di filosofia ___________________________________________________________________ CORSO DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FILOSOFIA CICLO XXXI TITOLO TESI DARWIN’S CONTRIVANCES: ORCHIDS, EVOLUTION AND SCIENTIFIC ETHICS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE OF XIX CENTURY Coordinatore: Ch.mo Prof. Francesca Menegoni Supervisore: Ch.mo Prof. Fabio Grigenti Dottorando : Antonio Danese INDEX 0 INTRODUCTION 5 0.1 Topic 5 0.2 Why Orchids? 9 0.3 Structure of the work 12 1 THE DARWINIAN THEORY 14 1.1 The origin of the origin of species 14 1.2 The first concept of species 16 1.3 The renouncement of immutability and the problem of classification 18 1.4 Variation 23 1.5 The ecological context and the tree of life 26 1.6 New way of observing nature 28 2 FORERUNNERS OF DARWIN IN THE BOTANICAL FIELD 29 2.1 Cell and transmutation 31 2.2 The molecular basis for the development of life sciences 31 2.3 The starting points for Darwinian botany 33 3 THE WORK ON PLANT SCIENCES 35 3.1 The botanist Darwin 36 3.2 The movements of climbing plants 40 3.3 The insectivorous plants 43 3.4 Cross-self fertilisation 45 3.5 The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species 46 3.6 The power of movement in plants 49 4 ORCHIDS IN VICTORIAN AGE 52 4.1 Classification of new species of orchids 53 4.2 Linnaeus 54 4.3 Orchids, society, and literature 56 4.4 Darwin and orchids 59 5 THE ORIGIN OF On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Gap: Did Darwin Avoid Publishing His Theory for Many Years?
    Notes Rec. R. Soc. (2007) 61, 177–205 doi:10.1098/rsnr.2006.0171 Published online 27 March 2007 MIND THE GAP: DID DARWIN AVOID PUBLISHING HIS THEORY FOR MANY YEARS? by JOHN VAN WYHE* Christ’s College, Cambridge CB2 3BU, UK It is widely believed that Charles Darwin avoided publishing his theory of evolution for many years. Many explanations have been proposed to identify Darwin’s reasons or motives for doing so. This essay demonstrates that Darwin’s delay is a recent historiographical theme for which there is no clear evidence, and indeed is overwhelmingly contradicted by the historical evidence. It is also shown that Darwin’s belief in evolution was not a secret before publication. Instead of a man afraid of his secret theory’s being revealed to his prejudiced contemporaries, it is demonstrated that Darwin was understandably very busy and began his species book when he had completed work in hand, just as he had intended all along. This essay therefore rewrites a fundamental chapter in the story of Darwin’s life and work as usually told. Keywords: Charles Darwin; evolution; ‘Darwin’s delay’; historiography Considering that Darwin became an evolutionist in 1837.one would think that he would rush this, the most important theory in biology, to the printer as quickly as possible. Instead, he postponed publication for twenty years and was forced into action only by circumstances. Why this incredible procrastination? Ernst Mayr1 The very existence of Darwin’s two-decade delay has raised a fundamental question: Why did he refrain from publishing his theory of evolution for so long? Was it simply that he had scientific business to finish, or did fears of ostracism stay the squire’s hand? Adrian Desmond2 It is widely believed that Charles Darwin avoided publishing his theory of evolution, begun in the 1830s, until 1858 when Alfred Russel Wallace hit on a strikingly similar theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Deceived by Orchids: Sex, Science, fiction and Darwin
    BJHS 49(2): 205–229, June 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016 doi:10.1017/S0007087416000352 First published online 09 June 2016 Deceived by orchids: sex, science, fiction and Darwin JIM ENDERSBY* Abstract. Between 1916 and 1927, botanists in several countries independently resolved three problems that had mystified earlier naturalists – including Charles Darwin: how did the many species of orchid that did not produce nectar persuade insects to pollinate them? Why did some orchid flowers seem to mimic insects? And why should a native British orchid suffer ‘attacks’ from a bee? Half a century after Darwin’s death, these three mysteries were shown to be aspects of a phenomenon now known as pseudocopulation, whereby male insects are deceived into attempting to mate with the orchid’s flowers, which mimic female insects; the males then carry the flower’s pollen with them when they move on to try the next deceptive orchid. Early twentieth-century botanists were able to see what their predecessors had not because orchids (along with other plants) had undergone an imaginative re-creation: Darwin’s science was appropriated by popular interpreters of science, including the novelist Grant Allen; then H.G. Wells imagined orchids as killers (inspiring a number of imitators), to produce a genre of orchid stories that reflected significant cultural shifts, not least in the presentation of female sexuality. It was only after these changes that scientists were able to see plants as equipped with agency, actively able to pursue their own, cunning reproductive strategies – and to outwit animals in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Science FBC Student Notes.Pages
    EVOLUTION AND SCIENCE David Cloud Way of Life Literature www.wayofife.org Copyright 2015 Tese studies are from An Unshakeable Faith: An Apologetics Course, 2015 edition. Outline Introduction History of Evolution Darwin Skeptics Today Natural Selection Mutations Billions of Years Ape Men Fossil Record Introduction THE FIERCE BATTLE Churches are losing the youth. An Answers in Genesis survey found that two-thirds of children and teens who regularly attend “conservative” churches are gone by college age. According to an email survey I took in 2010 the average number of youth who drop out of churches that responded is 50%. Titus 1:9-12; we must shut the mouths of the skeptics by refuting their error. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE To protect you Te frst use of apologetics not to convince the unbeliever but to protect the believer, his family, and fellow believers. 1 When we are grounded in apologetics, we are not confused when we hear arguments by evolutionists, atheists, new agers, and cultists, either in person, in print, on the radio or television, or on the Internet. When we visit natural history museums we can see through the error of the displays. Churches must prepare the people to face the onslaught of end-time skepticism and apostasy, but most churches aren’t doing this. Tere are two common failings: (1) churches not careful enough about salvation; (2) churches not serious enough about training and discipleship. It is time to put away more of the games and get serious about these things. To prepare you to help other believers Every believer is to be a teacher (Heb.
    [Show full text]
  • Monkey Business
    ALREVIEW 57 struggles of the day rather than the nihilism which too many folks take wonder Rousseau wept—ony he was polar ice of night. postmodernity to mean. Black's still crying for himself. Foucault's mes­ hip, as it always has been for sage, by comparison, is dry-eyed. The problem here is not with Foucault bohemians—but it may be better now There is still hope that we can do bet­ but with us. The problem now is for radicals to fade to pink, even ter. whether there exists a sufficient will to against a background almost certainly think Foucault in this way, against the turning a greyer shade of blue. Little PETER BEILHARZ teaches in dominant current of fin-de-siecle sociology at La Trobe University. Monkey Business Darwin by Adrian Desmond and excerpt, the repetition of 'gutter', and James Moore (Penguin/Michael the salacious metaphors.) Jose Bor- Joseph). Reviewed by Darwin is an entertaining and (in the ghino. best sense) journalistic work which deliberately distances itself from the This massive 828-page block­ previous biographies that Desmond buster opens with a rhetorical and Moore see as "curiously blood­ rollercoaster. The preface less". By contrast, they try to "re-lo- smacks more of a Hollywood cate Darwin in his age" by writing a "defiantly social portrait", and they adventure movie (I was largely succeed. reminded of the first 15 minutes of Raiders of the Lost Ark) than The science in the book is fairly synop­ the normally staid and anaes­ tic—which is understandable for a thetised prose of 'straight' populist work; but too often Desmond science: and Moore assume a detailed knowledge of 19th Century British history.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth: That Darwin Worked on His Theory in Secret for Twenty Years
    MYTH11 THAT DARWIN WORKED ON HIS THEORY IN SECRET FOR TWENTY YEARS, HIS FEARS CAUSING HIM TO DELAY PUBLICATION Robert J. Richards There was no way in which Darwin was going to alienate important scientists by revealing his thinking on evolution—he did not do this for twenty years until he was forced into doing so. — Michael Ruse, Defi ning Darwin (2009) . what has become one of the major themes of this book: [is] Darwin’s motives for his long delay in publication. His fear of persecution and ridicule was based not only on the unpopularity of evolutionary theory, but on the fi ercer retribution meted out against proponents of materialism. — Howard E. Gruber, preface to Darwin on Man (1974) Two assumptions of long standing surround the history of Charles Darwin’s (1809–1882) On the Origin of Species: fi rst, that he worked on his theory for twenty years in secret and did so out of fear. But fear of what? A variety of fears have been attributed to him: fear of being charged with atheism, with materialism, or with bad science—of a charade of science that was embarrass- ingly speculative, comparable to that of his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802), or that of the French naturalist Jean- -1— Baptiste de Lamarck (1744–1829) (see Myth 10). Then there is 0— the second, associated assumption that these fears stayed his hand +1— 514-61509_ch01_1P.indd 88 06/10/15 12:51 am DARWIN WORKED ON HIS THEORY IN SECRET FOR TWENTY YEARS 89 in publishing his theory, delaying the appearance of his great book.
    [Show full text]