Reforzar La Lucha Antiimperialista

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

21st International Meeting of Communist and Workers’ Parties 18-20 October – Izmir – Turkey Motion “Strengthening anti-imperialist struggle” The workers and peoples are confronted with the intensification of the imperialist offensive that directly attacks labor, social and other human rights, assaults the democratic and sovereign rights of the peoples, deepens militarism, war and interference and promote reactionary and fascist forces. In this context, the Communist and Workers’ parties, participants of the 21st International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties, held in Izmir, Turkey, on 18, 19 and 20 October: - Express their solidarity with the struggle of workers and peoples and with the popular and anti-imperialist forces and movements that resist the attacks of imperialism. - Express their solidarity with the initiatives that strengthen the objective of confronting imperialism and of reinforcing the struggle for a World of progress and social justice, environmentally sustainable, of peace and cooperation, as are examples, among other, of the Anti-imperialist Solidarity Meeting, for Democracy and Against Neoliberalism to be held in Havana, Cuba, in the month of November, or of the initiative of the Peoples’ World Assembly to turn the last week of May 2020 into a world anti-imperialist week of struggle. Subscribing Parties: • Communist Party of Argentina • Communist Party of Australia • Workers Party of Bangladesh • Democratic Progressive Tribune – Bahrein • Workers Party of Belgium • Communist Party of Belgium • Communist Party of Britain • Communist Party of Brazil • Communists of Catalonia • AKEL – Cyprus • Communist Party of Cuba • Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia • Communist Party in Denmark • Communist Party of El Salvador • Communist Party of Finland • French Communist Party • German Communist Party • Hungarian Workers Party • Communist Party of India • Communist Party of India (Marxist) • Tudeh Party of Iran • Communist Party of Israel • Italian Communist Party • Communist Party (Italia) • Jordanian Communist Party • Lebanese Communist Party • Nepal Communist Party • Palestinian Peoples Party • Communist Party of Pakistan • Paraguayan Communist Party • Portuguese Communist Party • Communist Party of Russian Federation • Communist Party of Soviet Union • Syrian Communist Party (Unified) • Communist Party of Spain • Communist Party of the Peoples of Spain • South African Communist Party • Communist Party of Sri Lanka • Communist Party of Uruguay • Communist Part of Ukraine • Union of Communists of Ukraine • Communist Party of USA • Communist Party of Venezuela • Communist Party of Vietnam .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Pdf | 548.22 Kb
NEPAL’S NEW ALLIANCE: THE MAINSTREAM PARTIES AND THE MAOISTS Asia Report N°106 – 28 November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE PARTIES................................................................................................................ 3 A. OUTLOOK .............................................................................................................................3 B. IMPERATIVES ........................................................................................................................4 C. INTERNAL TENSIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ..............................................................................5 D. PREPARATION FOR TALKS .....................................................................................................7 III. THE MAOISTS .............................................................................................................. 8 A. OUTLOOK .............................................................................................................................8 B. IMPERATIVES ........................................................................................................................9 C. INTERNAL TENSIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ............................................................................10 D. PREPARATION FOR TALKS
[Show full text]
Que Termine Ya La Masacre Del Pueblo De Palestina
QUE TERMINE YA LA MASACRE DEL PUEBLO DE PALESTINA Comunicado común de Partidos Comunistas y Obreros Los partidos comunistas y obreros que firman este Comunicado Común condenan el asalto bárbaro y criminal del estado de Israel contra el pueblo de Palestina. Expresamos nuestra plena solidaridad con el pueblo de Palestina y llamamos a los trabajadores en todo el mundo a movilizarse para que se fortalezca la ola de condena contra Israel y a expresar de forma práctica la solidaridad con el pueblo de Palestina. Los EE.UU. tienen grandes responsabilidades para estos desarrollos sangrientos ya que apoyan de todo modo a Israel en la continuación de la opresión y la masacre del pueblo palestino. Además, la UE tiene responsabilidades porque mantiene una postura de “distancia igual” entre el agresor y la víctima y al mismo tiempo desarrolla la cooperación con Israel a nivel militar, económico y político. Los partidos comunistas y obreros que firman este comunicado exigen: La condena del crimen contra el pueblo palestino El cese inmediato de los asaltos aéreos continuos contra el pueblo de Palestina y la prevención de las operaciones terrestres. La retirada del ejército israelí de ocupación. La liberación de todos los presos políticos de las cárceles israelíes. El derribo del muro inaceptable de división y el levantamiento de toda forma de bloqueo de los palestinos, en la Ribera Occidental y en la Franja de Gaza. El cese de los asentamientos y la retirada de todos los colonos que se han asentado más allá de las fronteras de 1967. El derecho de retorno de todos los refugiados palestinos a sus hogares, en base a las decisiones pertinentes de la ONU.
[Show full text]
The Communist Party Sweden
INTERNATIONAL GUESTS GREETING MESSAGES 18 TH CONGRESS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY SWEDEN Guests and Greetings from Costa Rica, Cuba, Czech Republik, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Guatemala, Honduras, DPR Korea, Lao PDR, Norway, Palestine, Philippines, Poland, Schwitzerland, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syria, US, Venezuela, Vietnam and WFTU All international guests were welcome on stage at the first day of the congress. International guests and greeting messages The Communist Party, Sweden, has friends Cuba: Embassy of Cuba all over the world. It was clearly visible on Denmark : Danish Communist Party at the 18 th congress 5-7 th of January 2017 El Salvador : Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (FMLN) with many international guests present and France : Pole of Communist Revival in France, many greeting messages sent to the con - PRCF gress. DPR Korea: Embassy of DPR Korea 13 international delegations attended the congress in Laos : Embassy of Lao PDR Göteborg. They were representing organizations in Palestine : Popular Front for the Liberation of twelve countries in Europe, Middle East, Asia and Palestine (PFLP) South and Central America. Philippines : National Democratic Front (NDF) Among the guests were Communists, anti-imperi - Sri Lanka : People's Liberation Front (JVP) alists and other forces that play a progressive role in Syria: Syrian Communist Party (United) their countries. Like British Trade Unionists Against UK : Trade Unionists Against the EU the EU which for decades has worked for Britain to Venezuela: Embassy of Bolivarian republic of leave the EU and in the referendum in June last year Venezuelan was on the winning side. In addition to organizations that the guests represent, The following international guests were present in the Communist Party received greetings from seve - the congress premises in Göteborg: ral organizations from all over the world.
[Show full text]
From Cold War to Civil War: 75 Years of Russian-Syrian Relations — Aron Lund
7/2019 From Cold War to Civil War: 75 Years of Russian-Syrian Relations — Aron Lund PUBLISHED BY THE SWEDISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS | UI.SE Abstract The Russian-Syrian relationship turns 75 in 2019. The Soviet Union had already emerged as Syria’s main military backer in the 1950s, well before the Baath Party coup of 1963, and it maintained a close if sometimes tense partnership with President Hafez al-Assad (1970–2000). However, ties loosened fast once the Cold War ended. It was only when both Moscow and Damascus separately began to drift back into conflict with the United States in the mid-00s that the relationship was revived. Since the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011, Russia has stood by Bashar al-Assad’s embattled regime against a host of foreign and domestic enemies, most notably through its aerial intervention of 2015. Buoyed by Russian and Iranian support, the Syrian president and his supporters now control most of the population and all the major cities, although the government struggles to keep afloat economically. About one-third of the country remains under the control of Turkish-backed Sunni factions or US-backed Kurds, but deals imposed by external actors, chief among them Russia, prevent either side from moving against the other. Unless or until the foreign actors pull out, Syria is likely to remain as a half-active, half-frozen conflict, with Russia operating as the chief arbiter of its internal tensions – or trying to. This report is a companion piece to UI Paper 2/2019, Russia in the Middle East, which looks at Russia’s involvement with the Middle East more generally and discusses the regional impact of the Syria intervention.1 The present paper seeks to focus on the Russian-Syrian relationship itself through a largely chronological description of its evolution up to the present day, with additional thematically organised material on Russia’s current role in Syria.
[Show full text]
Read the Full PDF
en Books published to date in the continuing series o .:: -m -I J> SOVIET ADVANCES IN THE MIDDLE EAST, George Lenczowski, 1971. 176 C pages, $4.00 ;; Explores and analyzes recent Soviet policies in the Middle East in terms of their historical background, ideological foundations and pragmatic application in the 2 political, economic and military sectors. n PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND SOCIALISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST, Howard S. Ellis, m 1970. 123 pages, $3.00 en Summarizes recent economic developments in the Middle East. Discusses the 2- significance of Soviet economic relations with countries in the area and suggests new approaches for American economic assistance. -I :::I: TRADE PATTERNS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, Lee E. Preston in association with m Karim A. Nashashibi, 1970. 93 pages, $3.00 3: Analyzes trade flows within the Middle East and between that area and other areas of the world. Describes special trade relationships between individual -C Middle Eastern countries and certain others, such as Lebanon-France, U.S .S.R. C Egypt, and U.S.-Israel. r m THE DILEMMA OF ISRAEL, Harry B. Ellis, 1970. 107 pages, $3.00 m Traces the history of modern Israel. Analyzes Israel 's internal political, eco J> nomic, and social structure and its relationships with the Arabs, the United en Nations, and the United States. -I JERUSALEM: KEYSTONE OF AN ARAB-ISRAELI SETTLEMENT, Richard H. Pfaff, 1969. 54 pages, $2.00 Suggests and analyzes seven policy choices for the United States. Discusses the religious significance of Jerusalem to Christians, Jews, and Moslems, and points out the cultural gulf between the Arabs of the Old City and the Western r oriented Israelis of West Jerusalem.
[Show full text]
Federalism Is Debated in Nepal More As an ‘Ism’ Than a System
The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II Post Peace Agreement Constitution Making in Nepal Volume II The FEDERALISM Debate in Nepal Edited by Budhi Karki Rohan Edrisinha Published by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) 2014 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Support to Participatory Constitution Building in Nepal (SPCBN) UNDP is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. United Nations Development Programme UN House, Pulchowk, GPO Box: 107 Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: +977 1 5523200 Fax: +977 1 5523991, 5523986 ISBN : 978 9937 8942 1 0 © UNDP, Nepal 2014 Book Cover: The painting on the cover page art is taken from ‘A Federal Life’, a joint publication of UNDP/ SPCBN and Kathmandu University, School of Art. The publication was the culmination of an initiative in which 22 artists came together for a workshop on the concept of and debate on federalism in Nepal and then were invited to depict their perspective on the subject through art. The painting on the cover art titled ‘’Emblem” is created by Supriya Manandhar. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the book are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP/ SPCBN. PREFACE A new Constitution for a new Nepal drafted and adopted by an elected and inclusive Constituent Assembly (CA) is a key element of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of November 2006 that ended a decade long Maoist insurgency.
[Show full text]
Nepal's Constitution (Ii): the Expanding
NEPAL’S CONSTITUTION (II): THE EXPANDING POLITICAL MATRIX Asia Report N°234 – 27 August 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. THE REVOLUTIONARY SPLIT ................................................................................... 3 A. GROWING APART ......................................................................................................................... 5 B. THE END OF THE MAOIST ARMY .................................................................................................. 7 C. THE NEW MAOIST PARTY ............................................................................................................ 8 1. Short-term strategy ....................................................................................................................... 8 2. Organisation and strength .......................................................................................................... 10 3. The new party’s players ............................................................................................................. 11 D. REBUILDING THE ESTABLISHMENT PARTY ................................................................................. 12 1. Strategy and organisation ..........................................................................................................
[Show full text]
United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic
United Arab Republic 1 United Arab Republic ةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-MuttahidahUnited Arab Republic ← → 1958–1961 ← (1971) → ← → Flag Coat of arms Anthem Oh My Weapon[1] Capital Cairo Language(s) Arabic [2] Religion Secular (1958–1962) Islam (1962–1971) Government Confederation President - 1958–1970 Gamal Abdel Nasser United Arab Republic 2 Historical era Cold War - Established February 22, 1958 - Secession of Syria September 28, 1961 - Renamed to Egypt 1971 Area - 1961 1166049 km2 (450214 sq mi) Population - 1961 est. 32203000 Density 27.6 /km2 (71.5 /sq mi) Currency United Arab Republic pound Calling code +20 Al-Gumhuriyah al-Arabiyahةدحتملا ةيبرعلا ةيروهمجلا :The United Arab Republic (Arabic al-Muttahidah/Al-Jumhuriyah al-Arabiyah al-Muttahidah), often abbreviated as the U.A.R., was a sovereign union between Egypt and Syria. The union began in 1958 and existed until 1961, when Syria seceded from the union. Egypt continued to be known officially as the "United Arab Republic" until 1971. The President was Gamal Abdel Nasser. During most of its existence (1958–1961) it was a member of the United Arab States, a confederation with North Yemen. The UAR adopted a flag based on the Arab Liberation Flag of the Egyptian Revolution of 1952, but with two stars to represent the two parts. This continues to be the flag of Syria. In 1963, Iraq adopted a flag that was similar but with three stars, representing the hope that Iraq would join the UAR. The current flags of Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen are also based on Arab Liberation Flag of horizontal red, white, and black bands.
[Show full text]
Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections 2008 Elections Parliamentary of Chronicle Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections Volume 42
Couverture_Ang:Mise en page 1 22.04.09 17:27 Page1 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2008 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 42 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamen tary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the background and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distribution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU’s database on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 42 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2008 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2008 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 42 1 January - 31 December 2008 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2009 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22 919
[Show full text]
Constitutional Moments and the Paradox of Constitutionalism in Multinational Democracies (Spain, 2006-2013)
FIRST DRAFT-----PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE OR CITE (this is only for conference participants) May 3, 2013 DCC International Conference 4/22/13 Dr. Jaime Lluch, Visiting Post-Doctoral Fellow in Democracy, Citizenship, and Constitutionalism, Political Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, USA [email protected] Constitutional Moments and the Paradox of Constitutionalism in Multinational Democracies (Spain, 2006-2013) The Paradox of Constitutionalism Most formulations of the paradox of constitutionalism are based on the observation that at times there can be a collision between constituent power and constitutional form, or a clash between politics and law, or between democracy and constitutionalism. Such a collision can lead to a clash of legitimacies between an established constitutional form and the constituent power represented by the democratic will of a people in a well-defined territory. Moreover, modern constitutions often aim not only to establish a form of governmental authority, but also to “reconstitute the people in a particular way. The notion of a constitutional identity of a people, and particularly its relation to the constituent power possessed by the people, is perplexing” (Walker and Loughlin 2007: 1). There is the suggestion, in the first place, that to the degree that there are “natural” units of “peoples,” constitutional texts can reshape and mold these “natural” boundaries between “peoples.” Political identities can thus be “constitutionalized,” given that there is some space for malleability and fluidity, but, conversely, constitutional form itself is not unchallengeable (Walker and Loughlin 2007: 2). Therefore, “if the influence of constitutional form lies in its ability to refine the meaning and import of collective political identity, its authority must nevertheless in some measure depend upon its continuing capacity faithfully to reflect that collective political identity.
[Show full text]
Nepal: Identity Politics and Federalism
NEPAL: IDENTITY POLITICS AND FEDERALISM Asia Report N°199 – 13 January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. IDENTITY POLITICS IN NEPAL ................................................................................. 3 A. ETHNIC ACTIVISM: PAST AND PRESENT ....................................................................................... 3 1. Before 1990 .................................................................................................................................. 3 2. After 1990 .................................................................................................................................... 4 B. ETHNIC DEMANDS AND THE “PEOPLE’S WAR” ............................................................................. 5 C. FEDERALISM AFTER THE PEACE DEAL .......................................................................................... 7 III. THE POLITICS OF FEDERALISM .............................................................................. 9 A. THE MAOISTS .............................................................................................................................. 9 B. THE MAINSTREAM PARTIES ....................................................................................................... 10 1. The UML: if you can’t convince them,
[Show full text]
January 31, 1958 Report of the Hungarian Ambassador in Cairo on the Establishment of the United Arab Republic and the Syrian Public Opinion in 1958 (Exceprts)
Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified January 31, 1958 Report of the Hungarian Ambassador in Cairo on the establishment of the United Arab Republic and the Syrian public opinion in 1958 (exceprts) Citation: “Report of the Hungarian Ambassador in Cairo on the establishment of the United Arab Republic and the Syrian public opinion in 1958 (exceprts),” January 31, 1958, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, MOL-M-KS 288 f.32/1958. 8.ő.e. Translated by András Bocz. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/122511 Summary: This report by the Hungarian ambassador in Cairo states that the Syrian people are wary toward President Nasser’s creation of the United Arab Republic, fearing he will enforce a dictatorship, however the Syrian communist party is in full support of the union. Original Language: Hungarian Contents: English Translation Strictly confidential! Reactions to and the aftermath of the events The events took the Syrian public totally unprepared. In the first few days the crowd, heated by nationalism, was cheering the idea of the union enthusiastically. However, it lasted only for a few days. Many of the people began to look at the likely political events from the point of view of their own personal fate. I tried to meet as many people I could and listen to many different views during these days. Low- and middle-ranking foreign affairs officials were extremely embittered, saying that that they would be the first to be dismissed. For example, the deputy head of the protocol department said that he would resign if he were to be transferred to Cairo.
[Show full text]